598:"the only thing I done is tell the user that attacks are completely unacceptable and will not be tolerated". Did you send this in a message then? Because you never explained anything to him. That is indeed what I'm saying, as the talk page could be an effective medium to sort the issue out, which they did, in fact, do. They sorted it out themselves, before you gave your warning. And no, I don't need any policy info. I know the basics of what i'm doing, I don't attack people personally anyways.
566:
less pertinent. The users involved resolved the issue, so why does it matter? Yes, I believe talk pages are less unacceptable, especially when the issue had already been resolved and no harm was done. And aside from giving your one warning statement about blocking, you said little else that mattered. In fact, you specifically did NOT say what you stated you said. "user that attacks are completely unacceptable and will not be tolerated" was no where in your statement.
347:
190:
279:
836:
146:
521:
So you promote learning by banning? I'm not saying he deserves a get out of jail free card. I'm saying that a personal attack - on a talk page, not a userpage or article - Doesn't merit a one warning way of going about it. Three strikes - you're out. I've attempted to post this at least three times
477:
No, I am not. The user was obviously distressed; can you not understand that? I'd promote a three strikes-you're out method, which would be more effective. And though
Knowledge's interface now allows users to dive in and begin editing, I think a better strategy would be to slowly acclimate users to
918:
If you can prove that those two members are notable, or their notability is proven in the AFD, I will greatly improve the articles. If they aren't notable, I would rather they get deleted now, rather than you, me, or another editor spend hours revamping the article, and have it get deleted shortly
630:
What do you mean issue? By issue, I meant the dispute between the two users, did you not investigate it before jumping in, or even read past the title of the personal attack? After the attack, the user who was attacked replied, and the issue (dispute between the two users) was settled. Either way,
492:
Being distressed only explains the behavior, but doesn't excuse it. Most of the time it's 5-strikes and your out, but personal attacks are much more serious. And the user doesn't get a "get out of jail free card" just because he/she is new. The user needs to learn that that kind of behavior is not
565:
What is banning then? I assume blocking is where a user is permanently cut off from wikipedia, which I think is extreme to say the least. The difference to me is that a talk page is not really an encyclopedial reference or article; it is a place for people to talk, so I think personal attacks are
972:
Correct, but you can still source info from a full band article. The more info you can find about them, the better the article is, and (most of the time) the better chances it has to stay. If FFDP ever releases a documentary DVD, you could probably get a bunch of info from that. I'm working to
569:
Banning is preventing a user from editing specific articles. And blocking isn't always permenant, they can range from 3 hour blocks to a year long block. I never said that the sentance was in a warning. If you got a warning for something, like say vandalism you would know that vandalism isn't
536:
I know you've said that, and what's the difference between talk pages and other things? Should talk page attacks be less unacceptable than user page attacks. Banning is different than blocking, and the only thing I done is tell the user that attacks are completely unacceptable and will not be
448:
So you are saying it's "okay" to insult other users and threaten to delete their user page? Does that make sense to you? And what else would we do if the user keeps attacking? Give them a complementery shirt and ask them to leave? You may want to rethink that, and read some polices would help
601:
It was just a demonstration. I've already said it, but warnings are basically that sentance about unacceptable stuff in a better format. And how does someone settle the issue of the user stinking out? And what do issues have to do with personal attacks? How do you settle a personal
634:
I did read the whole thing. The user was mad at
Closedmouth for deleting his/her user page. The user then stated that he/she did not have good intentions from what the user said. And how can you tell it was settled. The attacking user never responded. Anyway, this is probaly over
663:
I just assume it was settled because the user's page was fixed; however, it seems someone else has deleted it again. Your actions may have been correct in this situation, time will only tell. However, I still think that personal attacks should be less royally disputed.
570:
acceptable, right? And what your saying is that attack on a user page and attacking on a user talk page with the exact same thing, the talk page would get a lesser warning, right? Would you like me to bring up polices, I've been here long enough to know what is what.
167:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
720:
On my opinion I would say that PA are more important that vandalism, having been attacked 120 different times. Vandalism is most likely some kids having annoying fun, but
Personal attacks are deliberate attempts to harass and sometimes threaten other
478:
Knowledge's standards and policies as they come in. You can't expect everyone to read every policy while they edit. Plus, this is a nine-year old kid. I don't think he deserves special treatment, but I think immaturity should be factored in.
132:
Where did you see the War is the Answer cover that has "Walk Away" on it? You didn't post references, so I have no clue it it's true or not. If you don't know how to add them, just post the links on my talk page and I'll do it for you.
903:
has an article about one song and only 2 members. That is because that one song was their only song to reach notability. The two members that have articles have them because they have done notable work with other (notable) bands
850:
887:
I could get a wealth of info about them, but if they don't get AFDed now, another member might AFD them later, after the articles have been greatly expanded. You might want to look at
429:
Quite unfair. I think users deserve more than one warning, and other steps should be taken besides threats of blocking accounts. By blocking users, you make wikipedia even
315:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
853:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
1006:
Refs aren't that hard, just the formatting might be confusing. For web stuff you can do something like this (click "edit" to see the code). and that would output
360:
182:
Unless you have the answer to my question, it's irrelevant. Aren't you a bot anyways? It's your job to add signatures when I don't, so don't worry.
706:
Sorry, I meant responded to. I think they're not as important as vandalism, and I think they should receive a slightly more lenient approach.
946:
Solo projects, if they are a columnist in a magazine, if they are featured in a magazine, book written on or about them. That sort of stuff.
749:
I can understand that, but a personal attack after your userpage has been deleted for no given reason seems to be a bit less dangerous.
323:
31:
209:
164:
824:
304:
53:
48:
802:
795:
287:
846:
58:
842:
828:
278:
85:
1040:
995:
978:
961:
934:
900:
871:
849:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
38:
27:
331:
65:
736:
693:
650:
617:
585:
552:
508:
464:
410:
381:
353:
346:
291:
154:
69:
814:
261:
150:
93:
81:
73:
1032:
987:
953:
926:
863:
750:
707:
665:
523:
479:
434:
213:
43:
34:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
80:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
974:
913:
909:
173:
1025:. I forgot the exact format for CD and DVD citings, but I'm sure they aren't much different.
327:
196:
118:
899:
for future reference). Not all members of bands and songs rise to notability, for example
892:
729:
686:
643:
610:
578:
545:
501:
457:
403:
374:
309:
253:
809:
image. In general, we don't allow pictures of living people that are non-free. Cheers. --
290:. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge takes
1066:
1022:
896:
810:
806:
257:
236:
98:
113:
I was just wondering why you got deleted the picture for "Hard To See" that I put up.
888:
905:
222:
Where can I find an MP3 of the song "Salvation (Live}" by Five Finger Death Punch?
169:
189:
161:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
114:
835:
722:
679:
636:
603:
571:
538:
494:
450:
396:
367:
1070:
1062:
1046:
1001:
967:
940:
877:
818:
758:
744:
715:
701:
673:
658:
625:
593:
560:
531:
516:
487:
472:
442:
418:
389:
335:
265:
243:
229:
177:
134:
122:
103:
145:
163:
1061:
Where did you hear the "Succubus" is a B-Side from "Way of the Fist"?
294:
very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the
856:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
158:
77:
322:
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
302:
of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a
184:
363:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
345:
277:
274:
File copyright problem with File:Five Finger Death Punch.jpg
433:
verifiable, and get rid of the one thing we need, editors.
252:
Limewire.com is good but this is beyond the intent of the
153:
and
Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
1083:
1008:
851:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jeremy
Spencer (drummer)
149:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
316:
201:
208:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their
88:, or ask your question on this page and then place
199:has been answered. If you need more help, you can
1021:There are other fields that you can fill in, see
352:Hello, Morbus Rising. You have new messages at
919:thereafter by somebody who puts it up for AFD.
8:
200:
64:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1075:
895:for notability of musicians (and even
92:before the question. Again, welcome!
326:. Thanks again for your cooperation.
7:
977:members' articles, now that I have
845:, an article that you created, for
14:
834:
803:File:Five Finger Death Punch.jpg
796:File:Five Finger Death Punch.jpg
288:File:Five Finger Death Punch.jpg
188:
162:
144:
678:Ummm... how are they disputed?
631:let's just agree to disagree.
324:media copyright questions page
1:
39:The five pillars of Knowledge
54:How to write a great article
30:to Knowledge! Thank you for
1071:00:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
1047:02:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
1002:14:54, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
968:22:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
941:10:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
878:18:14, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
819:07:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
759:21:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
745:19:05, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
716:18:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
702:18:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
674:18:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
659:17:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
626:17:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
594:17:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
561:16:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
532:16:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
517:16:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
488:16:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
473:15:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
443:15:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
419:16:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
390:15:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
336:08:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
212:, or consider visiting the
1111:
178:03:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
26:Hello, Morbus Rising, and
123:05:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
843:Jeremy Spencer (drummer)
829:Jeremy Spencer (drummer)
754:
711:
669:
286:Thank you for uploading
266:19:52, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
244:19:48, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
104:06:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
979:(Set This) World Ablaze
901:All That Remains (band)
395:I have responded again.
354:Weirdo 789's talk page
350:
310:image description page
283:
282:File Copyright problem
825:Articles for deletion
349:
281:
203:ask another question
17:Welcome to Knowledge
739:Wribbit!(Sign here)
696:Wribbit!(Sign here)
653:Wribbit!(Sign here)
620:Wribbit!(Sign here)
588:Wribbit!(Sign here)
555:Wribbit!(Sign here)
511:Wribbit!(Sign here)
467:Wribbit!(Sign here)
425:Moving conversation
413:Wribbit!(Sign here)
384:Wribbit!(Sign here)
82:Knowledge:Questions
361:remove this notice
351:
284:
49:How to edit a page
32:your contributions
975:Killswitch Engage
914:The Acacia Strain
910:Killswitch Engage
841:I have nominated
805:as a replaceable
743:
700:
657:
624:
592:
559:
515:
471:
417:
388:
242:
220:
219:
205:on your talk page
140:Your recent edits
72:your messages on
1102:
1095:
1094:
1092:
1090:
1080:
1045:
1036:
1029:
1019:
1017:
1015:
1000:
991:
984:
966:
957:
950:
939:
930:
923:
876:
867:
860:
838:
741:
734:
728:
725:
698:
691:
685:
682:
655:
648:
642:
639:
622:
615:
609:
606:
590:
583:
577:
574:
557:
550:
544:
541:
513:
506:
500:
497:
469:
462:
456:
453:
415:
408:
402:
399:
386:
379:
373:
370:
364:
241:
239:
233:
227:
207:
192:
185:
166:
148:
91:
74:discussion pages
1110:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1088:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1059:
1043:
1037:
1030:
1026:
1013:
1011:
1007:
998:
992:
985:
981:
964:
958:
951:
947:
937:
931:
924:
920:
885:
874:
868:
861:
857:
839:
832:
799:
737:
730:
723:
694:
687:
680:
651:
644:
637:
618:
611:
604:
586:
579:
572:
553:
546:
539:
509:
502:
495:
465:
458:
451:
427:
411:
404:
397:
382:
375:
368:
365:
358:
343:
276:
237:
231:
228:
157:by typing four
155:sign your posts
142:
130:
111:
102:
89:
59:Manual of Style
19:
12:
11:
5:
1108:
1106:
1097:
1096:
1074:
1058:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1039:
1020:
994:
960:
933:
917:
884:
881:
870:
833:
831:
827:nomination of
822:
798:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
426:
423:
422:
421:
357:
344:
342:
339:
275:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
247:
246:
218:
217:
210:user talk page
193:
141:
138:
129:
126:
110:
107:
96:
62:
61:
56:
51:
46:
41:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1107:
1085:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1056:
1048:
1044:
1042:
1035:
1034:
1028:
1024:
1010:
1005:
1004:
1003:
999:
997:
990:
989:
983:
980:
976:
971:
970:
969:
965:
963:
956:
955:
949:
945:
944:
943:
942:
938:
936:
929:
928:
922:
915:
911:
907:
902:
898:
894:
890:
882:
880:
879:
875:
873:
866:
865:
859:
854:
852:
848:
844:
837:
830:
826:
823:
821:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
797:
794:
760:
756:
752:
751:Morbus Rising
748:
747:
746:
742:
740:
735:
733:
726:
719:
718:
717:
713:
709:
708:Morbus Rising
705:
704:
703:
699:
697:
692:
690:
683:
677:
676:
675:
671:
667:
666:Morbus Rising
662:
661:
660:
656:
654:
649:
647:
640:
633:
632:
629:
628:
627:
623:
621:
616:
614:
607:
600:
599:
597:
596:
595:
591:
589:
584:
582:
575:
568:
567:
564:
563:
562:
558:
556:
551:
549:
542:
535:
534:
533:
529:
525:
524:Morbus Rising
520:
519:
518:
514:
512:
507:
505:
498:
491:
490:
489:
485:
481:
480:Morbus Rising
476:
475:
474:
470:
468:
463:
461:
454:
447:
446:
445:
444:
440:
436:
435:Morbus Rising
432:
424:
420:
416:
414:
409:
407:
400:
394:
393:
392:
391:
387:
385:
380:
378:
371:
362:
355:
348:
340:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
320:
318:
313:
311:
307:
306:
305:copyright tag
301:
297:
293:
289:
280:
273:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
250:
249:
248:
245:
240:
235:
234:
225:
224:
223:
215:
211:
206:
204:
198:
194:
191:
187:
186:
183:
180:
179:
175:
171:
165:
160:
156:
152:
147:
139:
137:
136:
127:
125:
124:
120:
116:
108:
106:
105:
100:
95:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
60:
57:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
36:
35:
33:
29:
24:
23:
16:
1087:. Retrieved
1084:"Google.com"
1078:
1060:
1038:
1031:
1027:
1012:. Retrieved
1009:"Google.com"
993:
986:
982:
973:improve the
959:
952:
948:
932:
925:
921:
906:Shadows Fall
886:
883:FFDP members
869:
862:
858:
855:
840:
801:I've tagged
800:
738:
731:
695:
688:
652:
645:
619:
612:
587:
580:
554:
547:
527:
510:
503:
483:
466:
459:
438:
430:
428:
412:
405:
383:
376:
366:
321:
314:
303:
299:
295:
285:
230:
221:
202:
197:help request
181:
143:
131:
112:
86:my talk page
84:, ask me on
63:
25:
21:
20:
493:acceptable.
328:Closedmouth
226:Try Google.
128:FFDP Tracks
109:Hard To See
76:using four
537:tolerated.
254:{{helpme}}
151:talk pages
90:{{helpme}}
66:Wikipedian
1089:15 August
1014:15 August
811:MZMcBride
732:Aww nuts!
689:Aww nuts!
646:Aww nuts!
613:Aww nuts!
581:Aww nuts!
548:Aww nuts!
522:already.
504:Aww nuts!
460:Aww nuts!
406:Aww nuts!
377:Aww nuts!
317:this link
292:copyright
258:My76Strat
68:! Please
1057:Succubus
893:WP:MUSIC
847:deletion
807:fair use
359:You can
341:Talkback
298:and the
214:Teahouse
44:Tutorial
22:Welcome!
1023:WP:CITE
897:WP:SONG
635:anyway.
602:attack?
308:to the
296:license
170:SineBot
28:welcome
1041:Willed
996:Willed
962:Willed
935:Willed
889:WP:BIO
872:Willed
721:users.
300:source
159:tildes
115:apks94
78:tildes
724:Abce2
681:Abce2
638:Abce2
605:Abce2
573:Abce2
540:Abce2
496:Abce2
452:Abce2
398:Abce2
369:Abce2
256:tag.
232:Chzz
195:This
99:βǃʘʘɱ
1091:2009
1067:talk
1063:Epeu
1033:Weak
1016:2009
988:Weak
954:Weak
927:Weak
891:and
864:Weak
815:talk
755:talk
712:talk
670:talk
528:talk
484:talk
449:too.
439:talk
431:less
332:talk
262:talk
174:talk
135:Epeu
119:talk
70:sign
916:).
94:Lәo
1069:)
912:,
908:,
817:)
757:)
714:)
672:)
530:)
486:)
441:)
334:)
319:.
312:.
264:)
238:►
176:)
168:--
121:)
1093:.
1065:(
1018:.
904:(
813:(
753:(
727:|
710:(
684:|
668:(
641:|
608:|
576:|
543:|
526:(
499:|
482:(
455:|
437:(
401:|
372:|
356:.
330:(
260:(
216:.
172:(
133:~
117:(
101:)
97:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
