868:
make a plant article with the sparse info provided. Itseems to be the case that some folks think Google hits make for a de facto keep but Ive googled kaulim and uyot getting a hundred results per page and scrolled through many such pages (as others probably have) to conclude these are a certain 'delete'. My point is I dont think its practical to invest any more time and effort on these things. If the delete is successful, great, if not I say remove the plant project tags and forget about them, no sense in pouring more time/effort/conversation into these dead-ends when editors could be focusing on valid material (like articles needing taxoboxes).
1959:
31:
465:
you click on a redirect, there should be a little blue link at the top of the page that says "Redirected from ...". If you click on the redirect name, it should send you directly to the redirect page, where you can edit it and create the stub you wished to creat. Alternatively, you could type the following into your browser window to get to the redirect page to edit it: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Roystonea_altissima&redirect=no
481:
Palm", I would create one at "Puerto Rico royal palm". I believe Wiki software will transfer all searchers for capitalized versions and route them through the lowercase redirect, but not the other way around. In other words, if you create the capitalized redirect and someone searches for a lowercase version of the common name, it won't redirect them. Searches are quasi-case sensitive. At least that's been my experience with them.
328:? I really like the work they do on urban sprawl. I have a bunch of friends who are urban planners so I talk to them a lot and that led me to start editing wikipedia articles on the topic. I grew up in Topeka, Kansas which was really messed up by a completely lack of urban planning. I'd enjoy collaborating on an article so let me know if something jumps out at you that could use editing. Look forward to working together!
1831:
1677:
1616:
1553:
1484:
1423:
1367:
1305:
1249:
1141:
1079:
1018:
954:
886:) and it appears as if, at least from their comment on Kaulim's deletion discussion, that the user has changed his/her opinion. I think the closing admin might decide to delete - the keep comments didn't address the concern. Regardless, I think you're right that these have taken up too much time on our end and if they're not deleted we can abandon them. Cheers,
594:
template. Say, for example, a species is located at its common name on
Knowledge (XXG) and the gallery with the photos on Commons is at the binomial, you would input {{Commons|Article title on Commons}}. Likewise if no gallery article exists but the photos are in a category, you can link to that by inputing {{Commons|Category:Title of category}}. Cheers, --
351:
1219:
sorting the palm stub category, which has become large and so I proposed three subcategories to help balance the load. Since the palms constitute one of the largest angiosperm families, and the subfamily and tribe information for such large families is useful, I decided I'd add it to the pages as long as I was sorting all the stubs anyway.
1751:
Yes I'm local. I got that
Burnett book you used and several others at Haslan's Book Store in St. Pete. One of the biggest used book stores in the southeast (or at least they claim something along those lines). In case you were serious, I hardly think being a g-g-g-...-son of someone creates a COI.
798:
Thanks! "OK well contrary to what I said above I think it is
Acoelorrhaphe (with the additional h). The other genera with the same greek root Rhapidophyllum and Rhapis have the h after r so I'd bet thats what the author intended" - that's the same conclusion I came to too, and is the spelling used by
593:
template on the page in the appropriate spot (usually near the references or external links). {{Commons}} automatically links to the page at
Wikimedia Commons with the same name as the article, but in cases where you want to link to a page with a different name, then you would use a piped link in the
764:
could be given a taxobox with the parameter filled in for which classification is being used. But I think that's been tried before and has often failed to persuade people that it might be necessary to include that information, especially since taxonomy is so often intermingled (as it is now, most of
759:
may not need a taxobox. Most of the "this name has been rarely recognized" articles don't have taxoboxes. I have been mulling around in my mind, though, discussing with the taxobox template people, about including another parameter. Underneath "scientific classification", there could be another line
464:
Hi there! I'm never sure why species redirect to the genus article, but it could happen for a lot of good reasons. Generally, though, every taxa is notable and should have its own article. The redirects, I assume, are temporary or the result of multiple page moves, etc. Don't worry about that. When
867:
which you started have some people suggesting they be kept. I will add commentary there if you think it will help the process but the bottom line in my mind is that you and myself and other plant editors have looked at these and made an effort to do something with them and we have decided we cant
203:
Gosh, that was a while ago. That section is highly technical and needs sourcing big-time, and it also sounded like it had been written by a Del Monte employee. I was hoping it would achieve some balance either through substantiating the claims with neutral sources or cleaning up the language to it
484:
Redirects of the species name to the genus page if the individual species article doesn't exist is a little controversial. It sometimes gives the appearance that an article already exists and discourages some from creating the page. Red links, however, encourage people to edit. That's my opinion,
480:
symbol. Click that once and it should show the following in the edit screen: #REDIRECT ] - Insert the binomial in between the brackets and save the page; that's your redirect! May I suggest using lowercase letters, though, in your redirects? So instead of creating a redirect at "Peurto Rico Royal
365:
This user has vandalized this article numerous times over the course of the past week. In many cases, no warning was placed on the user's talk page. At this point, the user needs a block for excessive vandalism. Please place a level four warning on his talk page, and report his vandalism to an
1919:
that is accessible from the commons link I added. That is kind of the preferred way of doing it, since galleries are kind of regarded as unencyclopaedic on
Knowledge (XXG). Anyway, no big deal. Reminds me, maybe I should take some pix of the roebelenii that are growing outside here... Cheers and
1218:
on the genus page. That information isn't as relevant for the species as for the genera, so I'm not pautting it on those pages. If you create a new genus stub or article, then please do include the subfamily and tribe. I don't expect to maintain that information; I am adding it because I am
443:
page, I added brackets around a couple of the species, hoping to turn them into red links so I could write stubs for the species. Doing so turned them into blue links which redirect to the genus page. How is this mended? Also, with so many of these articles they have a common name and the
448:
but when you search
Knowledge (XXG) for Senegal Date Palm it doesn't go right to the page (and isnt even first on the list of hits). Similarly, when the consensus is to list the species on the genus page, it seems redirects should be made for each species to the genus page. An example is
722:. Most hybrids will also fit into that category since they're typically cultivars, too. There still doesn't seem to be a good way to deal with natural hybrids that aren't cultivated, taxobox-wise. -- Most of those you listed can be reassessed to the cultivar infobox parameter. I agree
650:
Ok I went through the 'needing taxoboxes' list and there have been some hangers-on over there which haven't gotten sorted out yet. Some of them are hybrids and I thought I came across a 'needing hybrid taxoboxes' list a while back. Im not sure about the status of that list but
323:
Good to hear from you! That's cool you're interested in planning too. I am a computer scientist by trade, but I have gotten very interested in urban planning lately. I think of urban planning a bit like usability for society :-) Have you checked out the work of
787:
Hi
Mmcknight - yes, it probably should be, but has been held up by the discrepancy in the spelling of the name. I'll look further into it, to see if I can find out which spelling is correct. It won't be easy with both spellings having authoritative backings. -
220:
I noticed your question on
Newyorkbrad's talkpage. I've moved the page to the correct name and corrected the spelling in all the articles that link to it. Its probably worth keeping the old page name as a redirect as it is clearly a common mispelling.
771:
should probably be given a taxobox. For ordo and familia parameters, "unplaced" can be used. Thanks again for your work on that. I'll go through and take care of the cocktail onion article and PROD those two unknown articles. Cheers,
453:
where the species are listed but searching for them by name does not bring up the page. I hope Ive been clear, let me know what you think. I can ask the same stuff at the Plant
Project page if an obvious answer isnt
627:
Hi
Mmcknight4 - nice work on starting a number of articles on palms; couple of points, it isn't worth linking numbers, and also, please remember to use spellings relevant to the origin of the species (e.g., for
178:
in Commons. You may find this in my gallery in my userpage. Feel free to use the images, but also feedback if there is a way these images can be identified up to any taxonomic level possible. Thank you...--
848:. Happy day! More are always rolling in through new plant contributions. Since you were so good at it before, would you like to give me a hand sorting them out and reducing those categories to nil? Cheers,
858:
Following your suggestion I added delete tags to Kaulim and Uyot and whomever reviewed them decided they were worth keeping. It was probably my fault for being vague about the reason but even now, the
560:
I occasionally find plant or animal groups which have several pictures in commons but not on the page. How do you label a page with the "Wikimedia Commons has media related to 'subject'" tag?
444:
binomial. To ensure ease of use and consistency on the site it seems we should have re-directs made for the common name to the species page. How do you do that? For example I made a stub for
1214:
I'm going through all the genus articles for palms and adding the subfamily and tribe. Subtribes don't seem worth including (except maybe for Areceae). In any case, I am putting this ranks
765:
our taxoboxes jumble Cronquist higher taxonomy and APG lower taxonomy - I personally don't care for the higher clades of APG but think their lower taxonomy work is invaluable. I digress...).
414:
752:
requires a cultivar infobox and not the taxobox it has now. But I have no idea where to get the information necessary to fill out the cultivar infobox, or if it even exists.
355:
358:
useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
1937:
Leave them, its fine, not a worry. Be nice to expand the article so they could be included in text tho, the inflorescences are pretty nice pix and informative too.
476:". Click on the red link that says "You can create this page" which will take you to an edit screen. On the edit bar above the edit window, there should be a
1800:
is only definite for 1922 and earlier. Bridge construction hadn't even begun at that point. As old as those pictures look, they may still be copyrighted.
86:
908:
410:
1858:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1704:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1643:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1580:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1511:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1450:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1394:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1332:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1276:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1168:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1106:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1045:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
91:
860:
829:
125:
417:
to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
864:
833:
994:
that's already there is of a yellow-flowered form of the species, which is fairly atypical for this species (which usually has red flowers).
1224:
I may also cleanup / expand a few pages eventually, bu my biggest focus right now is helping with the Latin verb cleanup on Wikationary. --
679:
articles dont give you anything to go on so I would vote to delete them or remove the PlantProject tag and release them from our purview.
613:
could never become more than a stub. I'm going to merge its sections to the relative articles and make it a disambiguation page, I think.
490:
845:
719:
1805:
1787:
1769:
1742:
258:
can then become a disambiguation page that links to both that article and an article on the bromeliad genera. Perhaps under the title
472:. It's rather easy. Do a search for the term "Puerto Rico Royal Palm". The search result will say "No page with that title exists.
145:! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the
575:
101:
and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
841:
500:
1915:
Didn't mean to offend you by removing your gallery off the P. roebelinii page. What I did before that was create a gallery on
718:
Good work! There is indeed a "needs-cultivar-infobox=yes" parameter that I created not long ago that places those articles in
130:
110:
82:
1801:
1783:
1765:
1738:
468:
You've got it exactly right. You always want to create as many (reasonable) redirects as possible to the species page per
425:
748:. If so, it would need a cultivar box, but I think you're right that it's more a food wikiproject thing. Coincidentally,
120:
135:
1966:
1859:
1705:
1699:
1644:
1581:
1512:
1451:
1395:
1333:
1277:
1169:
1107:
1046:
38:
283:
If that works for you I'll move the page and write the disambiguation page, you can create the bromeliad article.
187:
370:
150:
105:
687:
is more like a food article than a plant article and, again, I think it just isnt enough to do anything with.
546:. I split off the species that had information on that page. Easy way to create a few more species articles! --
486:
354:
Hello. I'm in agreement with the recent revert you made . You may already know about them, but you might find
142:
730:
need to be deleted. They're too vague and we can't discover which species they refer to. Shall we PROD them?
362:. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.
563:
469:
89:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
1830:
1676:
1615:
1552:
1483:
1422:
1366:
1304:
1248:
1229:
1204:
1140:
1078:
1017:
383:
339:
406:
1846:
1692:
1658:
1631:
1594:
1568:
1499:
1465:
1438:
1382:
1320:
1264:
1183:
1156:
1094:
1033:
708:
is one of the "this name has been rarely recognized by taxonomists" articles which is hard to classify.
115:
883:
799:
the two sources I trust the most (USDA GRIN and Kew); I'll move it to that. Seems to be specified by
503:
and include the redirects in that category so someone could browse by common name or scientific name (
1975:
873:
633:
571:
367:
47:
17:
496:
380:
Your change to Parkia made the image to big. I take it that this was an accident and not vandalism.
359:
1898:
1409:
1121:
290:
269:
228:
1532:
999:
943:
887:
882:
Yeah, I saw the prod tags and subsequent removal. I did leave a note on that editor's talk page (
849:
773:
656:
595:
547:
511:
504:
1942:
1925:
1225:
1200:
422:
259:
205:
183:
146:
1757:
1654:
1591:
1461:
1179:
1060:
968:
818:
723:
672:
587:
170:
Hello! Just letting you know that I have uploaded several images of different varieties of
154:
491:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Plants#Redlinks for list of species in a new genus article
1715:
1638:
869:
822:
727:
709:
692:
676:
652:
567:
524:
455:
392:
329:
1797:
1761:
760:
that let's the reader know which classification is being used in the box. In that case,
1894:
1873:
1575:
1405:
1343:
1117:
735:
688:
285:
264:
223:
95:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type
1946:
1929:
1902:
1877:
1809:
1791:
1773:
1746:
1727:
1662:
1598:
1538:
1469:
1413:
1352:
1290:
1233:
1208:
1187:
1131:
1064:
1003:
946:
890:
877:
852:
811:
792:
776:
712:
695:
691:
doesnt have a taxobox, maybe pearl onion can remain a plant article but without a box.
640:
617:
598:
550:
527:
514:
458:
429:
395:
386:
332:
313:
296:
275:
234:
208:
191:
157:
1524:
995:
310:
251:
214:
1938:
1921:
1853:
1779:
1163:
1101:
1040:
664:
418:
179:
1974:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1753:
1327:
1056:
744:
739:
731:
684:
680:
668:
614:
510:
Let me know if any of that wasn't clear or if you need any help at all. Cheers,
175:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
928:
as an expression of my gratitude. Feel free to help yourself to some chocolate
1506:
1445:
1389:
1287:
1271:
929:
767:
761:
756:
749:
705:
701:
485:
though, and there's some disagreement. We've chatted about this before in the
343:
171:
164:
1869:
973:
953:
925:
828:
Hi there! I finally decided to take those two pesky articles to AfD debate:
542:
450:
440:
197:
1837:
1683:
1622:
1373:
1311:
1255:
1147:
1085:
1024:
808:
789:
637:
350:
1796:
Wow, look at that! You're good. Actually, Gandy lived until 1946 and
1559:
1490:
1429:
1737:!! Heh heh, looks like we have a book or two in common. Nice job.
660:
610:
1916:
499:
had so I stole it ;-) If you'd like, you could create a category at
439:
Hey I wanted to get your opinion on a couple things. First, on the
255:
247:
240:
982:
would be ideal if you can find one, as it is the type species of
738:
is more suitable for the Food and Drink WikiProject. I wonder if
1889:
1841:
1752:
Otherwise I wouldn't be allowed to edit distant relatives like
1687:
1626:
1563:
1494:
1433:
1377:
1315:
1259:
1151:
1089:
1028:
800:
391:
I think I fixed it after I noticed it. Thanks for the heads up.
937:
I am humbled by the trust placed in me to use the tools wisely.
1953:
25:
807:(here in ῤαφίς, "needle") should be transcribed as an 'h'. -
325:
1764:
but I'm not sure there's much more content to be found.
971:
article as the species in the photo is now classified as
1734:
683:
lists 2 species which this common name might apply to,
405:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
356:
Knowledge (XXG):Template messages/User talk namespace
1760:. I have faraway dreams of that one day becoming a
704:an editor wrote that the taxon is unclassified and
846:Category:Plant articles needing a cultivar infobox
720:Category:Plant articles needing a cultivar infobox
1782:? I never found one for the article I started.
495:Oh, one more thing. I really liked the idea that
636:spellings, such as metre and colour) - thanks,
1778:I don't suppose you've ever seen a picture of
986:.) However, it would be a good image for the
411:Knowledge (XXG):Images and media for deletion
8:
861:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Kaulim
830:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Kaulim
540:You're welcome! Oh, and I fixed the page at
489:archives. Actually, it was just last month:
246:OK, I suggest moving the present content of
153:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
69:I realize that it's a little late, but ...
1825:
1671:
1610:
1547:
1478:
1417:
1361:
1299:
1243:
1135:
1073:
1012:
902:
865:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Uyot
834:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Uyot
141:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1850:was updated with a fact from the article
1696:was updated with a fact from the article
1635:was updated with a fact from the article
1572:was updated with a fact from the article
1503:was updated with a fact from the article
1442:was updated with a fact from the article
1386:was updated with a fact from the article
1324:was updated with a fact from the article
1268:was updated with a fact from the article
1160:was updated with a fact from the article
1098:was updated with a fact from the article
1037:was updated with a fact from the article
842:Category:Plant articles needing taxoboxes
501:Category:Roystonea species by common name
401:Image:Mmcknight4.JPG listed for deletion
337:
1972:Do not edit the contents of this page.
583:Excellent question. You can place the
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
967:I removed the image you added to the
742:might be a cultivar of the suggested
734:should become a disambiguation page.
609:Sorry for undoing your wikilink, but
7:
632:, native to India and Pakistan, use
106:The Five Pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
907:Thank you for participating in my
85:to Knowledge (XXG). Thank you for
24:
899:Thank you for your vote on my RfA
1957:
1829:
1756:. Feel free to take a crack at
1675:
1614:
1551:
1482:
1421:
1365:
1303:
1247:
1139:
1077:
1016:
952:
349:
204:doesn't sound so pro-Del Monte.
29:
641:10:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
618:08:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
578:) 02:05, August 30, 2007 (UTC)
1:
1004:19:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
947:21:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
891:15:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
878:00:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
853:03:50, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
297:04:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
276:04:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
1199:Answered on my talk page. --
812:10:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
793:16:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
777:17:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
713:21:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
696:21:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
235:02:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
209:18:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
192:03:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
158:04:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
126:How to write a great article
599:02:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
551:01:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
528:01:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
515:00:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
470:the flora naming convention
459:23:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
366:administrator. Thanks. ---
92:New contributors' help page
2008:
1947:06:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
1930:06:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
1903:15:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
1878:12:35, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
1810:21:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
1792:20:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
1774:19:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
1747:19:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
1728:15:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
1700:William Whitaker (pioneer)
1663:03:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
1414:11:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
1353:13:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
1291:18:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
1234:19:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1209:18:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1188:15:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
1132:01:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
1065:09:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
333:00:19, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
314:20:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
1920:greets from New Zealand.
1599:19:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
1539:23:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
1470:03:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
924:Please accept a slice of
671:could be reassessed. The
1802:William I of Schenectady
1784:William I of Schenectady
1766:William I of Schenectady
1739:William I of Schenectady
990:article as the image of
803:Art. 60, that the Greek
700:And on the talk page of
474:You can create this page
430:00:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
396:22:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
387:22:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
149:, add a question to the
1860:Did you know? talk page
1714:Interesting article! --
1706:Did you know? talk page
1645:Did you know? talk page
1582:Did you know? talk page
1513:Did you know? talk page
1452:Did you know? talk page
1396:Did you know? talk page
1334:Did you know? talk page
1278:Did you know? talk page
1170:Did you know? talk page
1108:Did you know? talk page
1047:Did you know? talk page
371:15:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
1893:which is a dab page.
1735:my idea for an article
1544:DYK for Polyandrococos
1970:of past discussions.
409:, has been listed at
42:of past discussions.
634:Commonwealth English
407:Image:Mmcknight4.JPG
79:Mmcknight4/Archive 1
18:User talk:Mmcknight4
1070:DYK congratulations
992:Seemannia sylvatica
840:news! I found more
884:User:Until(1 == 2)
657:Angel wing begonia
630:Phoenix sylvestris
505:Category:Roystonea
131:Naming conventions
111:How to edit a page
87:your contributions
1995:
1994:
1982:
1981:
1976:current talk page
1917:Wikimedia Commons
1866:
1865:
1712:
1711:
1651:
1650:
1588:
1587:
1536:
1519:
1518:
1458:
1457:
1402:
1401:
1340:
1339:
1284:
1283:
1176:
1175:
1128:
1114:
1113:
1053:
1052:
1009:DYK: Actinorhytis
980:Gloxinia perennis
960:
959:
579:
566:comment added by
446:Phoenix reclinata
428:
413:. Please see the
326:www.sightline.org
309:Fixed, I think –
260:Navia (bromeliad)
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1999:
1991:
1984:
1983:
1961:
1960:
1954:
1911:P roebelinii pix
1887:Done except for
1833:
1826:
1758:Hamilton Disston
1725:
1720:
1679:
1672:
1618:
1611:
1555:
1548:
1537:
1530:
1527:
1486:
1479:
1425:
1418:
1369:
1362:
1350:
1307:
1300:
1251:
1244:
1143:
1136:
1126:
1081:
1074:
1020:
1013:
978:. (An image of
969:Gloxinia (genus)
956:
903:
592:
586:
561:
421:
353:
342:'s vandalism to
295:
274:
233:
121:Picture tutorial
116:Editing tutorial
99:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2007:
2006:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1987:
1958:
1913:
1885:
1824:
1733:Hey, you stole
1721:
1716:
1670:
1639:Plectocomiopsis
1609:
1607:Plectocomiopsis
1546:
1525:
1522:
1477:
1360:
1344:
1298:
1242:
1197:
1125:
1072:
1011:
965:
915:with a vote of
901:
826:
785:
653:Amandine potato
648:
625:
607:
590:
584:
437:
403:
384:Oysterguitarist
378:
347:
340:199.216.163.206
321:
307:
284:
263:
244:
222:
218:
201:
168:
136:Manual of Style
97:
75:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2005:
2003:
1993:
1992:
1980:
1979:
1962:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1912:
1909:
1907:
1884:
1881:
1864:
1863:
1834:
1823:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1710:
1709:
1680:
1669:
1666:
1649:
1648:
1619:
1608:
1602:
1586:
1585:
1576:Polyandrococos
1556:
1545:
1542:
1517:
1516:
1487:
1476:
1473:
1456:
1455:
1426:
1400:
1399:
1370:
1359:
1356:
1338:
1337:
1308:
1297:
1294:
1282:
1281:
1252:
1241:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1221:
1220:
1196:
1191:
1174:
1173:
1144:
1122:
1112:
1111:
1082:
1071:
1068:
1051:
1050:
1021:
1010:
1007:
964:
961:
958:
957:
950:
900:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
825:
816:
815:
814:
805:spiritus asper
784:
781:
780:
779:
753:
736:Cocktail onion
689:Cocktail onion
647:
644:
624:
621:
606:
603:
602:
601:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
533:
532:
531:
530:
518:
517:
508:
493:
482:
466:
436:
433:
402:
399:
377:
374:
346:
336:
320:
317:
306:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
243:
238:
217:
212:
200:
195:
167:
161:
139:
138:
133:
128:
123:
118:
113:
108:
74:
71:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2004:
1990:
1986:
1985:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1968:
1963:
1956:
1955:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1918:
1910:
1908:
1905:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1891:
1882:
1880:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1861:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1849:
1848:
1847:Did you know?
1843:
1839:
1835:
1832:
1828:
1827:
1821:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1798:public domain
1795:
1794:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1726:
1724:
1719:
1707:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1695:
1694:
1693:Did you know?
1689:
1685:
1681:
1678:
1674:
1673:
1667:
1665:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1646:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1634:
1633:
1632:Did you know?
1628:
1624:
1620:
1617:
1613:
1612:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1600:
1597:
1596:
1593:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1571:
1570:
1569:Did you know?
1565:
1561:
1557:
1554:
1550:
1549:
1543:
1541:
1540:
1534:
1529:
1528:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1502:
1501:
1500:Did you know?
1496:
1492:
1488:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1474:
1472:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1453:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1441:
1440:
1439:Did you know?
1435:
1431:
1427:
1424:
1420:
1419:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1397:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1385:
1384:
1383:Did you know?
1379:
1375:
1371:
1368:
1364:
1363:
1357:
1355:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1348:
1335:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1323:
1322:
1321:Did you know?
1317:
1313:
1309:
1306:
1302:
1301:
1295:
1293:
1292:
1289:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1267:
1266:
1265:Did you know?
1261:
1257:
1253:
1250:
1246:
1245:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1222:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1171:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1159:
1158:
1157:Did you know?
1153:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1138:
1137:
1134:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1119:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1097:
1096:
1095:Did you know?
1091:
1087:
1083:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1069:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1036:
1035:
1034:Did you know?
1030:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1015:
1014:
1008:
1006:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
985:
981:
977:
975:
970:
962:
955:
951:
949:
948:
945:
940:
938:
935:
933:
931:
927:
922:
920:
918:
914:
910:
905:
904:
898:
892:
889:
885:
881:
880:
879:
875:
871:
866:
862:
857:
856:
855:
854:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
824:
820:
817:
813:
810:
806:
802:
797:
796:
795:
794:
791:
783:Paurotis palm
782:
778:
775:
770:
769:
763:
758:
754:
751:
747:
746:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
716:
715:
714:
711:
707:
703:
698:
697:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
645:
643:
642:
639:
635:
631:
622:
620:
619:
616:
612:
605:Inflorescence
604:
600:
597:
589:
582:
581:
580:
577:
573:
569:
565:
552:
549:
545:
544:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
529:
526:
522:
521:
520:
519:
516:
513:
509:
506:
502:
498:
494:
492:
488:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:
461:
460:
457:
452:
447:
442:
434:
432:
431:
427:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
400:
398:
397:
394:
389:
388:
385:
381:
375:
373:
372:
369:
363:
361:
357:
352:
345:
341:
335:
334:
331:
327:
318:
316:
315:
312:
304:
298:
294:
293:
289:
288:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
273:
272:
268:
267:
261:
257:
253:
252:Navia (Spain)
249:
242:
239:
237:
236:
232:
231:
227:
226:
216:
215:Bromelioideae
213:
211:
210:
207:
199:
196:
194:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
166:
162:
160:
159:
156:
152:
148:
144:
137:
134:
132:
129:
127:
124:
122:
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
107:
104:
103:
102:
100:
94:
93:
88:
84:
80:
72:
70:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1988:
1971:
1965:
1914:
1906:
1888:
1886:
1867:
1854:Ptychococcus
1852:
1851:
1845:
1780:George Gandy
1722:
1717:
1713:
1698:
1697:
1691:
1652:
1637:
1636:
1630:
1604:
1595:
1589:
1574:
1573:
1567:
1523:
1520:
1505:
1504:
1498:
1459:
1444:
1443:
1437:
1403:
1388:
1387:
1381:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1326:
1325:
1319:
1285:
1270:
1269:
1263:
1226:EncycloPetey
1215:
1201:EncycloPetey
1198:
1193:
1178:--Well done
1177:
1164:Dictyosperma
1162:
1161:
1155:
1120:
1115:
1102:Dictyocaryum
1100:
1099:
1093:
1054:
1041:Actinorhytis
1039:
1038:
1032:
991:
987:
983:
979:
972:
966:
941:
939:
936:
934:
923:
921:
916:
912:
906:
837:
827:
804:
786:
766:
743:
699:
667:, and maybe
665:Olallieberry
649:
629:
626:
623:Palm species
608:
559:
541:
477:
473:
445:
438:
419:User:Gay Cdn
404:
390:
382:
379:
364:
348:
322:
308:
305:Re: Benidorm
291:
286:
270:
265:
262:or similar?
245:
229:
224:
219:
202:
169:
151:village pump
140:
96:
90:
78:
76:
68:
60:
43:
37:
1964:This is an
1754:Bing Crosby
1655:Daniel Case
1592:Bencherlite
1462:Daniel Case
1328:Hydriastele
1194:Gonophyllum
1180:Victuallers
1116:Well done!
745:Allium cepa
740:pearl onion
732:Rest-harrow
685:Pearl onion
681:Rest-harrow
669:Mission fig
562:—Preceding
523:Manythanks.
376:Parkia Edit
176:Philippines
155:Newyorkbrad
36:This is an
1507:Myrialepis
1475:Myrialepis
1446:Lytocaryum
1390:Korthalsia
1358:Korthalsia
1272:Eugeissona
1240:Eugeissona
930:zabaglione
870:Mmcknight4
836:. Oh, and
768:Haptanthus
762:Huerteales
757:Huerteales
750:tree onion
710:Mmcknight4
706:Haptanthus
702:Huerteales
693:Mmcknight4
568:Mmcknight4
525:Mmcknight4
497:WP:BANKSIA
456:Mmcknight4
454:available.
415:discussion
393:Mmcknight4
344:Louis Riel
330:Midwestmax
172:bromeliads
165:Bromeliads
163:images of
147:help pages
143:Wikipedian
98:{{helpme}}
1989:Archive 1
1895:Guettarda
1406:BorgQueen
1347:Wizardman
1124:<: -->
1118:Ruhrfisch
988:Seemannia
976:sylvatica
974:Seemannia
926:panettone
543:Boswellia
487:WT:PLANTS
451:Boswellia
441:Roystonea
198:Pineapple
180:Ate Pinay
174:from the
61:Archive 1
1838:16 April
1684:15 April
1623:10 April
1526:howcheng
1374:30 March
1312:28 March
1256:25 March
1148:19 March
1086:19 March
1025:14 March
996:MrDarwin
984:Gloxinia
963:Gloxinia
942:Cheers,
932:as well.
911:, which
755:I think
576:contribs
564:unsigned
319:Planning
206:Chubbles
1967:archive
1939:Kahuroa
1922:Kahuroa
1560:9 April
1491:3 April
1430:3 April
588:Commons
435:2 cents
426:(Contr)
368:Charles
360:sandbox
83:welcome
77:Hello,
73:Welcome
39:archive
1057:PFHLai
944:Rkitko
917:41/0/1
913:passed
888:Rkitko
850:Rkitko
819:Kaulim
774:Rkitko
724:Kaulim
673:Kaulim
661:Aprium
646:txbxes
615:Aelwyn
611:rachis
596:Rkitko
548:Rkitko
512:Rkitko
423:(talk)
292:scribe
271:scribe
230:scribe
81:, and
1883:Moves
1762:WP:FA
1723:broil
1718:Royal
1288:Bobet
1123:: -->
256:Navia
248:Navia
241:Navia
188:email
16:<
1943:talk
1926:talk
1899:talk
1890:Nypa
1874:talk
1870:Cirt
1842:2008
1806:talk
1788:talk
1770:talk
1743:talk
1688:2008
1659:talk
1627:2008
1564:2008
1533:chat
1495:2008
1466:talk
1434:2008
1410:talk
1378:2008
1316:2008
1260:2008
1230:talk
1205:talk
1184:talk
1152:2008
1090:2008
1061:talk
1029:2008
1000:talk
874:talk
863:and
844:and
838:good
832:and
823:Uyot
821:and
801:ICBN
728:Uyot
726:and
677:Uyot
675:and
572:talk
338:Re:
184:talk
1836:On
1822:DYK
1682:On
1668:DYK
1621:On
1605:And
1558:On
1489:On
1428:On
1372:On
1310:On
1296:DYK
1254:On
1216:ony
1146:On
1084:On
1023:On
909:RfA
809:MPF
790:MPF
638:MPF
311:Qxz
287:WjB
266:WjB
250:to
225:WjB
1945:)
1928:)
1901:)
1876:)
1868:--
1862:.
1844:,
1840:,
1808:)
1790:)
1772:)
1745:)
1708:.
1690:,
1686:,
1661:)
1653:--
1647:.
1629:,
1625:,
1590:--
1584:.
1566:,
1562:,
1521:--
1515:.
1497:,
1493:,
1468:)
1460:--
1454:.
1436:,
1432:,
1412:)
1404:--
1398:.
1380:,
1376:,
1342:--
1336:.
1318:,
1314:,
1286:--
1280:.
1262:,
1258:,
1232:)
1207:)
1186:)
1172:.
1154:,
1150:,
1110:.
1092:,
1088:,
1063:)
1055:--
1049:.
1031:,
1027:,
1002:)
919:.
876:)
663:,
659:,
655:,
591:}}
585:{{
574:•
507:).
478:#R
254:.
190:)
1978:.
1941:(
1924:(
1897:(
1872:(
1804:(
1786:(
1768:(
1741:(
1657:(
1535:}
1531:{
1464:(
1408:(
1228:(
1203:(
1182:(
1127:°
1059:(
998:(
872:(
570:(
186:•
182:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.