397:
birthday as March, 1914. Unfortunately, I can't find a reference to the exact date, except for a date that she had a birthday party (which may or may not be on the day). I'll be adding the month and day at some point. Her age at disappearance is wrong as well, she was 25, though her disappearance bulletin lists it as 26, which was her age at the time of the bulletin. I suspect Collin's article gets her age wrong in a lot of the article because he worked backward on wrong assumptions.
438:
646:
573:
362:
Thanks; I did not know that, about the name she used as a writer. What's your source - I am looking for another source for the article - I think it'd be an interesting DYK, but all I have is
Collins's article and the NPR stuff that is closely related to it. A DYK would need at least another source, I
182:
How about you go through the edits and figure out which edits were good and bad? For example, what do you think their rationale was for making the caption in the image clearer by stating that
Brittany is kissing Abby on the cheek instead of just saying who is on the left and who's on the right, which
159:
Hi there. While I agree that the article needs merge/cleanup, what you did there was a wholesale revert to that banned editor's revision. Please, by all means, figure out the good from the bad and improve the article, but do not just simply re-instate a banned editor's changes. You have no idea as to
396:
Hi, you actually beat me to setting up a page for her, I'd been planning to ever since reading the article you linked. I suspect we'd been thinking along the same lines. :) I have a copy of her biography called, "Barbara, the
Unconscious Autobiography of a Child Genius," which has a reference to her
199:
I reviewed all of the edits, and added back all the ones that were appropriate. Since I didn't see any that were inappropriate, I added them all back in (and added one other automatic edit). Let me be clear -- *I* added the information back in. It's is my edit, not some other editor's. I don't know
211:
And can I be honest? I grow weary of this cliquish, overly dramatic "no idea as to the rationale behind their edits nor of the likely implications off-wiki". If you want to make a case, then point me to the public discussion where I can make an informed judgment. If there is no public discussion,
658:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
205:
Please specify *exactly* which information you don't think is appropriate for the article, and I'll consider doing some further editing. Otherwise, I will improve the article by putting the information back in. Please do not undo my (and I emphasize MY) edits again without a good
239:
a "take my word for it" situation, and I can't say more than that much as I hate leaving it like that. Still, if you wish to claim those edits as yours and are willing to stand over them regardless, then that's fine by me. The banned editor has already ended up in plenty of
273:
There is no reasonably conceivable way that
Nairebis's edit that you reverted could hurt anyone. Are you saying now then that we are allowed to revert your last edit to that article as long as the person who does it is willing to "stand over them" (whatever that means)?
118:
I figured that was probably the case. :) I'm kind of glad you wacked that link. I've let it sit there because it's not really a commercial link, and it was somewhat an analysis of the story, but really it wasn't a very high quality, academic analysis.
585:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
528:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
686:
613:
200:
or care where the edits came from -- and I shouldn't have to care. If I have to care where good information comes from, then something is seriously wrong with something behind the scenes at
Knowledge.
670:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
597:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
409:
Makes a more interesting DYK than most DYK's, in my mind, and I added you as co-author on the nom. Thanks for the fixes and additions. Read the araticle talk page for an interesting factoid.
217:
As I said before, I'm sure there's some good reason for all this. But this secretive "just take my word for it" stuff just doesn't impress me and damages the reputation of
Knowledge.
469:, who by age fourteen had published two novels to critical acclaim, left her apartment the night of December 7, 1939, at age twenty-five, and was never seen again?
244:
trouble as a result of editing
Knowledge and is actually still doing so (reading this, Mr. Morrow?). All I can do is try to limit his hurting of others -
183:
could be confusing unless you say from which directing you're facing? What implications could there possibly be "off-wiki" for making such an edit?
65:
25:
to
Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
700:
627:
553:
696:
623:
549:
487:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
49:
679:
606:
34:
22:
540:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
691:
618:
545:
488:
474:
444:
54:
329:
72:
using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
465:
456:
356:
497:
437:
279:
188:
29:
235:
Since much of this stuff actually involves the privacy of other people, including off-wiki, then yes, it
667:
594:
449:
414:
383:
368:
142:
108:
61:
541:
325:
73:
484:
289:"There is no reasonably conceivable way that Nairebis's edit that you reverted could hurt anyone"
44:
212:
then there is no policy. If it's something in real life, then it should be handled in real life.
84:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
406:
Anyway, I will probably be adding new info here and there. I'm still reading the biography. :)
654:
581:
563:
517:
508:
275:
184:
85:
663:
590:
537:
521:
410:
379:
364:
138:
137:
The editor left links to his blog all over ACC articles. Check my history, you will see...--
104:
678:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
605:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
536:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
478:
675:
602:
533:
525:
69:
671:
598:
529:
340:
218:
120:
89:
77:
39:
645:
572:
292:
245:
161:
471:
You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page
241:
160:
the rationale behind their edits nor of the likely implications off-wiki -
682:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
609:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
704:
631:
557:
418:
387:
372:
348:
333:
307:
283:
260:
226:
192:
176:
146:
128:
112:
93:
501:
524:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
685:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
612:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
432:
461:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was
291:- you don't know that. Seriously. And yes, pretty much -
666:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
593:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
516:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
103:That was a friendly fire casualty :-). Thanks.--
8:
378:Oh, duh, just the Columbia page, I guess.
60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
453:was updated with a fact from the article
363:think. A birth date would be nice too.
7:
655:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
582:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
639:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
14:
542:review the candidates' statements
644:
571:
436:
689:and submit your choices on the
652:Hello, Nairebis. Voting in the
579:Hello, Nairebis. Voting in the
429:DYK for Barbara Newhall Follett
548:. For the Election committee,
518:Arbitration Committee election
509:ArbCom elections are now open!
504:) 12:04, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
1:
668:Knowledge arbitration process
632:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
595:Knowledge arbitration process
558:13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
147:18:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
129:18:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
113:17:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
30:The five pillars of Knowledge
705:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
50:How to write a great article
616:and submit your choices on
544:and submit your choices on
419:03:36, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
388:18:51, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
373:18:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
324:What country is she from?
722:
697:MediaWiki message delivery
624:MediaWiki message delivery
614:the candidates' statements
550:MediaWiki message delivery
177:21:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
94:16:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
349:15:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
334:23:20, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
308:03:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
284:03:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
261:04:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
227:04:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
193:01:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
344:
222:
124:
489:Did you know? talk page
466:Barbara Newhall Follett
457:Barbara Newhall Follett
357:Barbara Newhall Follett
664:Arbitration Committee
591:Arbitration Committee
564:ArbCom Elections 2016
522:Arbitration Committee
21:Hello, Nairebis, and
526:arbitration process
339:The United States.
74:Knowledge:Questions
680:arbitration policy
607:arbitration policy
566:: Voting now open!
538:arbitration policy
35:How to edit a page
495:
494:
482:
713:
648:
575:
472:
440:
433:
305:
302:
300:
258:
255:
253:
174:
171:
169:
83:
721:
720:
716:
715:
714:
712:
711:
710:
709:
708:
649:
641:
636:
635:
619:the voting page
576:
568:
546:the voting page
512:
498:The DYK project
431:
360:
322:
298:
296:
293:
251:
249:
246:
167:
165:
162:
157:
101:
99:re:rescue party
81:
55:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
719:
717:
687:the candidates
650:
643:
642:
640:
637:
577:
570:
569:
567:
561:
515:
511:
506:
493:
492:
483:and add it to
445:8 January 2011
441:
430:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
401:
400:
399:
398:
391:
390:
359:
353:
352:
351:
326:Postcard Cathy
321:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
266:
265:
264:
263:
230:
229:
214:
213:
208:
207:
202:
201:
196:
195:
156:
155:*that* article
153:
152:
151:
150:
149:
132:
131:
100:
97:
66:sign your name
58:
57:
52:
47:
42:
37:
32:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
718:
707:
706:
702:
698:
694:
693:
688:
683:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
660:
657:
656:
647:
638:
634:
633:
629:
625:
621:
620:
615:
610:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
587:
584:
583:
574:
565:
562:
560:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
510:
507:
505:
503:
499:
490:
486:
480:
476:
470:
468:
467:
460:
459:
458:
452:
451:
450:Did you know?
446:
442:
439:
435:
434:
428:
420:
416:
412:
408:
407:
405:
404:
403:
402:
395:
394:
393:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:
375:
374:
370:
366:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
337:
336:
335:
331:
327:
319:
309:
306:
304:
290:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
262:
259:
257:
243:
238:
234:
233:
232:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
215:
210:
209:
204:
203:
198:
197:
194:
190:
186:
181:
180:
179:
178:
175:
173:
154:
148:
144:
140:
136:
135:
134:
133:
130:
126:
122:
117:
116:
115:
114:
110:
106:
98:
96:
95:
92:
91:
87:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
33:
31:
28:
27:
26:
24:
19:
18:
690:
684:
661:
653:
651:
617:
611:
588:
580:
578:
513:
496:
464:
462:
455:
454:
448:
361:
323:
294:
288:
276:For An Angel
247:
236:
185:For An Angel
163:
158:
102:
88:
78:my talk page
76:, ask me on
59:
20:
16:
15:
692:voting page
479:quick check
411:Herostratus
380:Herostratus
365:Herostratus
139:Legionarius
105:Legionarius
80:, or place
676:topic bans
603:topic bans
534:topic bans
475:here's how
320:Lynn Adams
82:{{helpme}}
70:talk pages
62:Wikipedian
40:Help pages
672:site bans
599:site bans
530:site bans
463:... that
64:! Please
502:nominate
485:DYKSTATS
341:Nairebis
219:Nairebis
121:Nairebis
45:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
206:reason.
23:welcome
520:. The
701:talk
662:The
628:talk
589:The
554:talk
415:talk
384:talk
369:talk
345:talk
330:talk
280:talk
223:talk
189:talk
143:talk
125:talk
109:talk
514:Hi,
443:On
355:re
90:(t)
86:Zoz
68:on
703:)
695:.
674:,
630:)
622:.
601:,
556:)
532:,
477:,
447:,
417:)
386:)
371:)
347:)
332:)
299:is
282:)
252:is
242:RL
237:is
225:)
191:)
168:is
145:)
127:)
111:)
699:(
626:(
552:(
500:(
491:.
481:)
473:(
413:(
382:(
367:(
343:(
328:(
303:n
301:o
297:l
295:A
278:(
256:n
254:o
250:l
248:A
221:(
187:(
172:n
170:o
166:l
164:A
141:(
123:(
107:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.