User talk:Nigelj/Archive 5

2499:

historicity of Jesus material, we have, unfortunately, had to recognize that even when the evidence is against people, they don't let up. That's why Bruce is blocked for a year now. Sometimes, like maybe with the HJ content, it looks like the best way to alleviate the problem is to create a page which prominently discusses the questions. In this case, so far as I can see, we don't yet have a page on the history of the global warming "argument." I think we have more or less done so over at the HJ content. Maybe the best way to resolve some of the problems here would be to start such a page. And, frankly, if I might be so blunt, it might help if some of the scientists were a bit more humble. I don't see clear evidence in the comment above, for instance, to support the statement that something is "clearly" the best, just an apparent declaration of fiat. As someone who is involved with a lot of topics around here, I know that in most places wikipedia effectively says we don't care if you are an "expert," we reproduce the sources. Preferably from the recognized reference books on the topics. I regret to say, unfortunately, that the editors who seem to understand that least well include several in the hard sciences who seem to be in some cases more devoted to the current academic opinions, some of which are changing as we speak, with even more devotion than some of our most fanatical religionists. Unfortunately.

276:(3) Bear in mind I intend to heavily change the layout of the page to included many other studies in the coming days.(naturally I'd like your feedback when I do) There are a few things wrong with the article, The IPCC findings should be on top, and the Yale paper should be elsewhere and should not include predictions by 2050. Again, the article is not named - life cycle emissions of nuclear power by 2050. It is titled - life cycle emissions by energy source. However I do think it would be good if we included some of this material. See below* 466:. The editor is likely a student, and, as seen on her (I assume that the editor is a she, judging by the user name) talk page, I gave her some advice about her planned overhaul of the Non-penetrative sex article and offered to help. But she has continued editing her sandbox seemingly without any regard to what I've stated. If her version mostly looks like the version she is working on, or doesn't but has a lot of the same type of formatting issues, when it is implemented into the 1862:'take-out' meme, designed to get the discussion quickly onto the 'hiatus', and then to prove that we don't need to do anything. 'Global warming' is the increase in total thermal energy in a global climate system, which leads to all kinds of things, one of which is a measurable rise in GMST. Writing an article about just one of the observable effects, while taken together all of them are capable of destroying human civilisation, seems negligent to me. -- 279:(4) Would you like me to insert the range of findings from wind power? As has been done for nuclear power in a very unbalanced manner? I have asked, why the over analysis of nuclear power and the attempts at making it look controversial? It is no more controversial than the range of CO2 emissions from wind power. With harmonization both are ~12 g/CO2. However how much CO2 wind actually saves in practice(tied to a grid with gas turbines) contentions.** 31: 2640: 2061: 1309: 1595: 3383: 3310: 3151: 1235: 804: 2391: 2315: 915: 308:

that a moderate level of wind penetration (12%) would result in efficiency penalties of 3% to 8%, depending on the type of conventional power plant considered. Gross and colleagues (2006) report similar results, with efficiency penalties ranging from nearly 0% to 7% for up to 20% wind penetration. Pehnt and colleagues (2008) conclude that

1061:), is that you did. (A) You added stuff; (B) I reverted; (C) You reverted my revert with no discussion. Edit summaries you might use in Step C do not excuse you from first seeking consensus on talk pages before you take step C. Moreover, there is a lower tolerance in the climate articles than usual due to the ruling by the Arbs in 397:

in the history and can be reinstated at any time. My feeling is to let Schrauwers go for it for a while longer - making constructive criticisms where necessary as they work - and see how it ends up. They're certainly putting a lot of work into it, which is only a good thing. And all the history is there for ever if we need it later. --

2468:

to try to change. Like the "anti-"global warming academic in Crichton's book, I live in a smallish apartment to minimize wasteful heating or cooling, don't own a car and prefer to actually walk or if possible take mass transit, and otherwise minimize my own environmental footprint, except for, obviously, computer network usage.

3225:. The problem you noted in 2010 still exists, and has gotten murkier, as inline citations are sporadically added (to a 200 page document, without page numbers), thus confusing whether what appears is one set of rules, an amalgam of all rules, etc. Any way to solicit an expert to have a look at this? Cheers, Le Prof. 2824:

Hi NAEG! Well, I took it that way (removing people they don't like from articles is an act of malice). If the statement was not, I apologize. I find the idea that editors publicly attribute motivations and malice to the other editors generally to be a bad idea. We should, in my opinion, discuss edits

2467:

about the point that the primary causative agent in the current warming is human action, primarily because of the number of potential variables we can't account for, that does not mean that I necessarily doubt its factuality of global warming or that it is, almost certainly, not in our best interests

741:

actions, which is proper here and not on the talk page. Will you answer or not? Your little notice is one thing, but I this is between you and me, I've been advised that such discussions are not for talk pages and are best discussed on your talk page. Your revert and lack of action on it is a problem

707:

Hey, a lack of discussion to prevent consensus (and its more than just myself) is not a valid form of debate. Its been weeks, there is no magic "consensus" to keep or delete, but if the editors will not engage I will remove it. Or I can take it to DRN, but silence on their part doesn't help. There is

307:

The thermal efficiency of fossil-based power plants is reduced when operated at fluctuating and suboptimal loads to supplement wind power, which may degrade, to a certain extent, the GHG benefits resulting from the addition of wind to the grid. A study conducted by Pehnt and colleagues (2008) reports

2869:

people may think removing the material of people they don't like from articles is a good thing and thus could be a compliment in certain circumstances. In this circumstance, however, Niglej clearly didn't think it was a good thing because he reverted the edit with an observation attributing the edit

2786:

To assert that another editor is removing "people they don't like" from articles is a personal attack. As a matter of fact, I quite like Klein as a writer. It is an easily checked matter of record that the ref I removed was an essay she wrote (as part of the roll-out of her recent book). Her opinion

950:

after being silent during initial interactions. But one thing is for sure: I will have my work cut out for me more than I already do if he continues editing Knowledge sexual topics. That type of editing is exactly why so many Knowledge sexual topics are in bad or mediocre shape. I understand that he

760:

first. I reverted your edit on one particular page because you have not received any consensus to make that edit on the talk page of that article. If you don't want to discuss your edit on the talk page of the relevant article that is not my problem. This is not "between you and me" at all, and I am

175:

trying to aggravate me. But throughout it all, I have kept open the possibility that the IP is not a troll or specifically MikeFromCanmore and that the IP truly does not know how Knowledge is supposed to work in a case such as this. I decided to not be mean or otherwise hostile to the IP in any way;

3058:

Agreed. My apologies for that. I normally use the Twinkle links, and on that occasion I expected to be presented with a textbox for my summary too, but my memory of that style of rollback link's behaviour was faulty. Therefore I immediately wrote my rationale onto the Talk page. In your experience,

1723:

Sphilbrick has expressed concern over the bold "anthropogenic climate change" appearing in the first sentence of the draft text in the grey box. I included it mainly due to a belief on my part that this was important to you. I no longer remember which of your comments made me think that, and of

396:

Schrauwers seems to be saying that they're not finished, and the point that all that scholarly background is a good thing seems valid. they did say that they agree with me, that the article needs all the up-to-date information too. As you say, nothing on Knowledge is ever 'lost' - it's always there

2457:

FWIW, if you read what I had said about pseudoscholarship like Michael Baigent, I agree with you about how we have to be based wherever possible on the best scientific or specialist academic sources. Unfortunately, like with the followers of Baigent and his speculations which run counter to pretty

1861:

Re #5: Oh no. We're back to GMST again. How did that happen? It's getting late here, and I have an early start tomorrow, so I don't have time to read the reams of new discussion at the moment. I don't agree that that is what this page is about, and actually consider that to be a divisive denialist

1553:

It is very clear that Throwable is considered to be a checked exception. For example the documentation of Throwable says "For the purposes of compile-time checking of exceptions, Throwable and any subclass of Throwable that is not also a subclass of either RuntimeException or Error are regarded as

1405:

without reading your comment, guilty as charged. I had opened the page, saw NAEG's comment, and, after a work distraction, composed a response, which I posted, then realized others, mainly you, had posted in between. I think we are largely saying the same thing, which is good, but just in case you

1339:

Hi, I asked that once. In my opinion, the only road to consensus either way is to complete the proposed FAQ. If we can't come close to completing the FAQ I'll probably switch to "delete" in the next AFD and cite that failure as persuading me there is no satisfactory replies to one or more of the

775:

And you continue to misinterpret. A lack of consensus building is not an indication of consensus and if there is no given reason for an image to remain then a contested image is best removed under the circumstances. It is not a problem with you at all, but instead how you try to be uninvolved when

381:

I have now gone through the history some what and I would like to let you know that I support your view that something has to be done to the article. Shrauvers has mass deleted content without discussion and omitting edit summaries. He has made the article a part of some anthropology ring and made

365:

article and among other things deleted valuable content that you entered. He has done this without discussion and explanation. I currently am in a content dispute with him, so I'd like to ask if could come and revert the unwarranted delete. Perhaps if you will, you can give input on the dispute in

294:

The deployment of nuclear power technologies that consume little to no uranium ore would reduce the chances of large uranium market ore grade decreases. Theoretical FBRs have been evaluated in the LCA literature. The limited literature that evaluates this potential future technology reports median

2483:

But this isn't about you. Or me. The best scientific and academic sources are clearly the ones summarised by the UN. I don't remember the UN spending 35 years saying over and over that tobacco wasn't that harmful (the first IPCC report was published in 1990). When editors are trying to define the

2246:

No, I'm half kidding: Those are all the things we say to the 'skeptics', it was fun to throw them at each other! I was a little vexed after putting in the effort to write that long post just to be told (what sounded like), "Refer to the archives - this always gets nowhere". Hopefully other people

1679:

The Solar Roadways AfD debate and talkpage is turning into an Edit War and an endless circular debate with DreamFocus. Can you recommend someone neutral/unbiased to arbitrate for us. He(she?) has decide that them and one other person (GreenC) constitute a "consensus" and keeps reverting my edits.

2484:

categorisation of science-based coverage, it is not helpful to have one editor writing long screeds on the topic of, "Well, science isn't all it's cracked up to be, you know: I once read a novel..." And what on earth has the historicity of Jesus got to do with it? No, please don't answer that. --

257:

You attached some citation needed tags in that article, I am puzzled, what specifically are you looking for? is it (1) Evidence that the Yale paper only looked at historical analyses from nuclear power plants? - Well that is evident in the Yale paper itself. They do no say anything about the CO2

2462:

and his fanatical support of the ahistoricity of Jesus, to the point of having received several topic bans or blocks, including the most recent one, for a lot of the non-experts in any field it is hard to (1) determine which are the best academic sources, and (2) whether in some cases, like the

588:

D'oh! Thank you. Sorry. I suspected that that was the kind of 'redundant' you might have meant, and I even went as far as to search the whole of the source-text of the article for "Boykoff", but because of the 'cite doi' format in ref 7, the author's name does not appear in the editable source!

3253:

I found your comment, but it was buried in the middle of a two year old discussion higher up the article talk page. I copied it down into the current discussion and I and others are now commenting on it there. I also added a belated 'welcome' template to your talk page, as it contains links to

2498:

Agreed. Just like the best academic sources are the ones which say Michael Baigent's and BruceGrubb's positions are on the hard fringe, if not beyond. And, like with some of the tobacco reports over time, there is a record of scientific reports themselves being skewed to one side. Over at the

229:

I understand what you mean. Given the large percentage of US editors, we can expect that a majority or at least a large majority is in favour of circumcision because they take it for the normal case. And at each and every RfC and similar process on the topic, we can expect them to be far more

1164:

I would think so but reading his talkpage history I'm not so sure since he's got quite some strong feelings about his edits and knowledge about the subjects he's editing. IMO he still has to accept that we go by reliable sources, not personal knowledge or opinion. I understand that it can be

3322:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1435:. Certainly complaints about NOTFORUM would pertain to some of the earlier remarks, but hopefully the exercise of complaint-collapse-selfrevert has established a prvention-producing precedence (PPP). My apologies if I overstepped, and by so doing plunked my pedal in poo (also PPP). 3395:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

687:

Nigel, thanks for welcoming me, and yes, please do give me advice on posting and such. I know absolutely nothing about Knowledge etiquette and suspect I need to start learning quickly. Also, I'm happy to provide comments on any energy related pages that you think might need

382:

the article focused on anthro. In doing this he has also deleted mention of sources that he does not like apparently (sources that are also anthropology). Still, some of the stuff he has added is probably valuable, and should be added after reverting to the early feb version.

2463:

scientific studies which indicated early on tobacco wasn't that harmful and/or beneficial in some way, whether what appears to be the "best" is in some way itself biased. That can and sometimes does create problems. And, FWIW, just to basically reassure you, although I have

108:

with this. And since I have the go-ahead from you to sometimes bother you with sexual topics or other topics that I may need assistance with on Knowledge, as I've done regarding other cases, I decided to drop in here on your talk page and give this matter a shot as well.

2117:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 2700:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 310:

the results of adding offshore wind power in Germany on the background power systems maintaining a level supply to the grid and providing enough reserve capacity amount to adding between 20 and 80 g CO2-eq/kWh to the life cycle GHG emissions profile of wind

3163:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1621:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

156:

It is hard to strike a balance between welcoming the newbies and putting up with endless . I know I had no idea what Knowledge was for and my first few edits as an IP were truly useless. Luckily someone was kind to me then, and I'm still here.

1958:

My trouble with the hatnote in NAEG V5 arises when you erase from your brain anything you know about the articles (like a newcomer to the page) and read the hatnote and first sentence all at once. Ver 5's hatnote reads like this to me....

1749:) as well though he hasn't had a chance to reply to my specific Q on that point yet (everyone's busy after all) and the thread is no so multi parted and long that he might not see it, (so I added a ping for him here to help move it along) 142:, Nigel. From here on out, I may ignore the IP if he keeps making the same arguments/proposals he's been making or if he makes any new proposals that we cannot take into consideration without violating a Knowledge guideline and/or policy. 2809:

Hardly. It might - maybe - indicate doubt about the other's good faith, but its hardly a personal attack. Unless of course you don't assume good faith yourself. That does open the door to your interpretation of this ambiguous example.

1971:

It sounds like "climate change" is discussed at the other page, but "climate change" is discussed at THIS page. A complete newcomer to these pages and topic would be assisted, I think, with a teensy bit more verbiage. At least, IMO.

989:

Thanks. And, yeah, I know. It's just that, like I've discussed with you before, we do need those who will be able to fill in for us when we leave; that's why one of the concerns with regard to Knowledge is replenishing our ranks.

3248:

is a webresource (as it has an URI) but it is not hyperlinked it is only used to transfer the file afd.html back and forth. So the sentence needs to be changed to (generally interlinked) Uni3993 (talk) 17:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

3040:

was an inappropriate use of the rollback tool, which is never to be used except in cases of edits obviously made in bad-faith. Reverts related to content disputes require manual edit summaries explaining your action. Thanks. –

1554:

checked exceptions.". In order to catch all checked exceptions, it is necessary to use Throwable, not Exception. Not only is this highly relevant to the topic of the page, but the current version is misleading and incorrect.

3016:

by you and other people, I'm afraid I can't, easily. I think that all of you need to stop hacking away at the article in this way, set it back to a stable version, and discuss the proposed edits before making them.

1625:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

1012:

Jeez, Nigel, I did not launch an edit war. (BRD is a great idea, but pertinent edit summaries usually work.) The first edit summary was based on "non-RS" and I pointed out that Moore is a Hoover Institute Fellow.

2965:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3423: 3350: 3191: 2261:

Ok thanks; I share the (frequent) experience of unsupported effort - recently I changed my perspective on why wikipedia's active editor numbers have been plummeting! Glad to see someone still holds out hope.

239:

PS: I just saw that the diff had no effect. He just removed my comment without so much as a response in the edit summary. Apparently a lot of editors will have to make a stink to make that POV template stick.

2292:

be described, required level of coverage by references, and partially about the way article's lead section should reflect the article content. If you could provide any input there, I'd really appreciate it!

2884:

I will take some time to consider that this was a mere mistake by Nigelj or oversensitivity on my part as I generally think Nigelj a very good editor. Perhaps that's why the edit summary was so jarring.

974:

I'll keep an eye out with you. No, we don't have any obligation to mentor every newcomer. Reverting and patiently pointing out relevant policies and guidelines is as good as we can do most of the time.

2787:

piece in the Nation is reliable for her opinion, per policy. That is why I removed the ref. Attacking the editor, as opposed to discussing the edit or adding better ref, is uncivil and inappropriate.

3407:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3334:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3175:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 630:

I am doing a manual for a Flight Simulator and I am doing a chapter on Air Navigation and would like to use the image - NDB transmitter at 49.205892,-2.219973. Callsign JW - Jersey West. 329.0 kHz.

2022:

Agree. Done. I'm not sure if the formatting there could be improved to make it clear that it's a threaded, multi-comment quote. Feel free there if you have any relevant formatting trick to hand. --

470:, I will revert. I don't like reverting people's hard work (unless the editor is very problematic), but I also don't like cleaning up after their messes, especially big messes. I and others have 3222: 1918:(e/c) Re #4: I'd be OK with it, but the middle section seems a bit wordy to me. I don't know what this longer version says that the shorter doesn't, that (in context) is important enough to 262:, only collating the findings of hundreds of papers that have already been published. Have you read the paper? There have yet to be any analyses of the CO2 emissions from Gen III reactors. 2865:

think taking material out of articles by people I don't like because I don't like them is a bad thing and malicious. So I assume when accused of it I am being accused of being malicious.

2659: 2071: 1366: 1513: 489:

I think what you've done is a great start, User K has been working hard on that sandbox page until a few hours ago. We'll just have to see what happens next. I'll keep an eye too. --

1272:

Hi, you wrote Red pen of Doom twice in your last post on Sheldrake talk. Did you mean to refer to two different editors, or was it just a slip and you only meant to write it once.

1509: 1165:

difficult at times to dismiss personal views and (perceived?) knowledge and replace them by or back them up with sources but that's not an excuse for anybody to ignore the rules.

1832:, and would welcome further pro/con criticism. I'm attempting to ping everyone who has taken time to speak up after past versions. If I overlooked anyone, please let me know. 171:

Yes, at first, I considered that the IP was trolling (and the IP did admittedly use humor, what I consider trolling-humor, in that initial post). I figured that the IP may be

959:

him instead of simply pointing him to guidelines and policies. But WP:Mentoring takes so much work, and, as you know, I'm barely enthusiastic about this site anymore at all.

1727:

Anyway, since this is one of the major sticking points on the current draft, how would you feel if we dropped ACC from the first sentence so that it becomes (more or less) "

1402: 2419: 2083: 2667: 3119:(quote: "I cannot tell if the vessel hull under heel really produces any significant turning moment, but the center of sail effort shift is really significant!") 2764:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Solution_stack#What_is_this_article.3F_Is_it_a_WP:LIST.3F_Who_decides_which_are_the_common.2C_named_stacks.2C_and_which_aren.27t.3F

1764:

Fine by me. I think you first used it, then I singled it out for bolding as it actually is a redirect to the GW page. I'm happy to drop it, and humbly suggest, "

889:? Whether you are or aren't, I'm pretty certain that the IP in question is the same person that some of us have encountered regarding urination matters, such as 104:, the IP will finally get the point. I don't know what else to state to the IP, but having a second voice of reason may help. Doesn't seem like I should bother 742:

which dispute resolution standards are typically followed. Since this concerns your behavior, I prefer it be here, unless you are particularly offended by it.

1464:

Ha ha! Except you removed your own comment from above the {cot}. I just restored it - never let it be said that anyone agreeing with me was 'rambling'! ;-) --

1618: 1317: 952: 3123:

I have worked a bit on the corresponding articles of the German wikipedia but am afraid that my English sailing vocabulary is not up to the task here.

1928:""Climate change" can also refer generally to either cooling or warming trends at any point in earth's history. Discussion of that general topic is at 3244:

I added my disscussion in the talk page but you're not even following. Web resources only has to have a URI it doesn't need to be interlinked example

1607: 1523: 1876:

No worries, it's true I added #5 (GMST) but I only did that in an attempt at neutral housekeeping. I'm advocating #4, where the first sentence is

1364:, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 2160:

article. It didn't belong there in the first place. I mean, to make such broad claims as were being made, one must have a lot of gall, I'd say!

2663: 1170: 1136: 603:

Heh. I've used doi as a parameter many times but I hadn't run across the cite doi option. I had to look at it twice to see what was going on.--

2825:

their form and their compliance with policy and guidelines. We should not be speculating on the imagined likes and dislikes of other editors.

1519: 1386: 1207: 861: 3437: 3364: 3282:. Please post a full detailed answer there and clarify that whether I should write on "Forced circumcision of children" under the existing 3205: 2990: 2007:

Suggest one of us move or copy the part between the breaks to the article talk page for posterity. If you agree, you want to or should I?

230:

motivated than the others to opine. I still think there is a lot that can be done, but passing this abomination as a GA was a big setback.

215:

Absolutely fine, Hans. I'm not sure that it is humanly possible to get anywhere with this, but I'm willing to help give it another try. --

3226: 2681: 2363: 2098: 1661: 1371: 329: 2521: 2418:

Since you've recently engaged in conversation with an IP, I'm providing an FYI that I have filed an SPI complaint. Please comment

2374: 1166: 1132: 652: 2870:

to my personal animus. That's why I assumed it was a personal attack. Again, if I have misunderstood this assertion I apologize.

1746: 1559: 1501: 1058: 435: 3433: 3360: 3201: 2986: 2714: 2672:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

2181: 2138: 2089:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

1108: 1516:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2689: 2106: 723:

Per the note at the top of this page, this is the wrong place to discuss this. Please use the relevant article talk page. --

3059:

though, are there many occasions when deleting an entire section, title and all, is constructive and done in good faith? --

269:

are under construction? You can find plenty of evidence that they are indeed being built(one goes online this year) on the

2597: 1196: 708:

nothing intrinsic for its inclusion, its just one of many pictures and the issues surrounding it have not been addressed.

1986:

OK. That's a good point - when you take the hatnote together with the opening sentence. You've convinced me. #4 it is. --

3416: 3343: 3184: 3100:

I would like to draw your attention to a few articles could need a clean-up to become more understandable and readable:

2607: 2345: 2302: 1824:

Thanks very much for investing energy and time contributing thoughts on efforts to draft a new first lead paragraph for

1360: 2977:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1847:

If you have time, what do you think of hatnote suggestion #4, which uses some of your ideas combined with other ideas.

428: 285:

Life cycle GHG emissions of wind-powered electricity generation published since 1980 range from 1.7 to 81 g CO2-eq/kWh

3428: 3355: 3196: 2982: 2804: 2515: 1042: 667:

That would be absolutely fine by me. I'm glad it may be of use. A small credit would be nice too. Which flight sim? --

3078: 2848: 2815: 2685: 2556: 2532: 2427: 2267: 2236: 2102: 2041: 2012: 1977: 1885: 1852: 1837: 1791: 1754: 1483: 1440: 1345: 1070: 890: 868: 568: 537: 84: 72: 67: 59: 38: 2697: 2114: 1611: 1555: 1382: 822: 2612:. It appears that the two editors are unlikely to reach a consensus as to which approach is more appropriate to 2693: 2110: 1277: 1192: 781: 747: 713: 474:

If I revert Katieskyv's version, I will properly incorporate a lot of her text into the article at some point.

3107:(could be improved with images from the article of the German wikipedia; also the text needs to be clarified) 1500:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3230: 2890: 2875: 2830: 2792: 2772: 2285: 1665: 529: 325: 2566:

Thanks, Guy. I think I'm done there. I'll leave him to others from now on, for my own safety and sanity. --

2378: 1427:

Nigelj and Gaba p (echoed at both your talk pages) I suppose I should have asked first but in light of the

648: 532:. Your input welcome but is not requested by me, nor is really needed insofar as I am qualified to judge. 299: 288: 282: 3050: 3006:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Occupy_Wall_Street#Huge_section_on_Police_infiltration_is_completely_gone.21

2677: 2247:

will now put in extra special effort to help us agree on some text! You never know! ;-) All good stuff. --

2094: 1191:, is wrong. Dry sex is a consequence of cleaning the vagina, NOT for the purpose of cleaning it. Regards, 270: 266: 259: 3404: 3331: 3172: 3074: 2844: 2811: 2718: 2552: 2528: 2504: 2473: 2423: 2263: 2232: 2217: 2142: 2037: 2008: 1973: 1881: 1848: 1833: 1787: 1750: 1479: 1436: 1341: 1256: 1066: 864: 533: 295:

life cycle GHG emissions similar to or lower than LWRs and purports to consume little or no uranium ore.

3113:(quote: "It should read as increasing, since water will add as a bottom weight there by increasing GM") 2119:

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

644: 3131: 2920: 2646:

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does

2617: 2593: 2589: 1740: 1412: 1375: 1325: 1052: 1030: 693: 640: 609: 577: 424: 420: 387: 371: 317: 241: 231: 206: 172: 2288:

that would really need input from more editors. It's about an ongoing disagreement on how should a

756:

I have no issue with you personally. If you have an issue with me personally, I suggest you look at

3293: 3283: 2978: 2710: 2204: 2134: 1829: 1273: 1131:

You're quite welcome. Hope the editor is following and reading the links I gave in my edit-summary.

1081: 812:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

777: 743: 709: 467: 463: 455: 1017:

I opened the discussion. Also, you are claiming that Liberty Fund is a right wing think tank, but

383: 367: 3104: 2886: 2871: 2843:

other's motivations involve "malice". Could be any number of emotional states, or none at all.

2826: 2788: 2768: 2673: 2289: 2165: 2090: 1735:

is the warming of the earth's blah-blah and related blah?" It would work for me, and hopefully

1681: 1478:

Thanks, I noticed that too and then the phone rang and I forgot. Guess I did find some doo doo.

1189:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Vaginal_lubrication&diff=532774377&oldid=532771859

321: 1660:

a Knowledge current climate change/global warming contributors discussion; of interest? (",)

1569:

This is not about me. Your comments on article content should be made on article talk pages. --

955:, but goodness. If I were as enthusiastic about Knowledge as I used to be, I'd probably try to 3391: 3318: 3279: 3159: 3141: 3043: 2954: 2945: 2676:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

2093:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

1640: 1539: 1097: 995: 964: 902: 846: 547:

Hi NAEG. Thanks and well done. I too have been worried about that editor's edits and style. --

508: 479: 181: 147: 114: 3400: 3327: 3259: 3168: 3064: 3022: 2974: 2958: 2934: 2759:

When you put your question in the edit-comment like that there is no direct way to answer.

2745: 2571: 2500: 2489: 2469: 2458:

much most of the academic consensus about the historical Jesus, and with other editors like

2442: 2403: 2341: 2327: 2298: 2252: 2213: 2205:

Talk:Solar_Roadways#Request_for_comment_because_of_deletion_of_referenced_criticism_sections

2124: 2027: 1991: 1949: 1899: 1867: 1805: 1777: 1685: 1574: 1469: 1455: 1292: 1215: 1151: 1116: 1025:

are two of the CEE authors (among many). I don't think they are part of the right wing.-- –

1018: 980: 956: 927: 766: 728: 672: 594: 552: 494: 443: 402: 346: 220: 162: 129: 47: 17: 3415:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3342:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3245: 3183:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2973:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1962:"This is about X. For this other thing see CLIMATE CHANGE. Global warming, also known as 1406:

were wondering if I had seen your comment, the answer is not when I posted, but now have.--

3127: 2916: 2733: 2624: 2601: 2582: 2525: 2459: 1736: 1407: 1321: 1062: 1048: 1026: 1022: 689: 604: 572: 2231:

Nigelj, we used to communicate really well. Did I irk you somehow, and not realize it?

2199:

Solar Roadways: Request for comment because of deletion of referenced criticism sections

3412: 3339: 3289: 3180: 3110: 2970: 2962: 2705: 2189: 2129: 2079: 1936: 1929: 1825: 1706: 1403:

Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

2639: 2060: 943: 3408: 3335: 3176: 2966: 2613: 2161: 2075: 1530:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1505: 757: 105: 3116: 1628: 1535: 1531: 1234: 1093: 991: 960: 898: 842: 832: 504: 475: 362: 177: 143: 110: 3382: 3309: 3150: 1210:

and commented there, so that other interested editors may join in if they wish. --

1255:

article, and for expanding the encyclopedia's coverage of Food and drink topics.

3441: 3368: 3297: 3275: 3263: 3255: 3234: 3209: 3135: 3082: 3068: 3060: 3052: 3026: 3018: 2994: 2938: 2930: 2923: 2894: 2879: 2852: 2834: 2819: 2796: 2776: 2749: 2741: 2722: 2627: 2616:. It would help, if other editors would look at both efforts and comment at the 2575: 2567: 2560: 2536: 2508: 2493: 2485: 2477: 2446: 2438: 2431: 2407: 2399: 2382: 2349: 2337: 2331: 2323: 2306: 2294: 2271: 2256: 2248: 2240: 2221: 2193: 2169: 2146: 2045: 2031: 2023: 2016: 1995: 1987: 1981: 1953: 1945: 1903: 1895: 1889: 1871: 1863: 1856: 1841: 1809: 1801: 1795: 1786:

Great, thanks. I'll give that a whirl tomorrow unless something else comes up.

1781: 1773: 1758: 1710: 1689: 1669: 1643: 1578: 1570: 1563: 1543: 1487: 1473: 1465: 1459: 1451: 1444: 1417: 1391: 1349: 1329: 1296: 1288: 1281: 1259: 1219: 1211: 1200: 1174: 1155: 1147: 1140: 1120: 1112: 1101: 1074: 1034: 999: 984: 976: 968: 931: 923: 906: 894: 872: 850: 785: 770: 762: 751: 732: 724: 717: 697: 676: 668: 656: 614: 598: 590: 582: 556: 548: 541: 512: 498: 490: 483: 447: 439: 419:

Have you been following the page? Thoughts, as to timeline and everything? -L001

406: 398: 391: 375: 350: 342: 244: 234: 224: 216: 209: 185: 166: 158: 151: 133: 125: 118: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2367: 3254:

several WP documents that you may find useful to familiarise yourself with. --

3073:

I've probably made the same mistake. Thanks to both of you for the reminder.

1602: 1586: 462:

Hey, Nigelj, what is your take on this? For what I mean, see what I stated at

737:

No one replied there about the content dispute in weeks. I am now discussing

3286:

article or not. Once I get a clear suggestion there, I may proceed further.

3005: 2737: 2185: 2157: 1724:

course I might have been off my rocker when I first formed that impression.

1702: 1251: 2437:

Thank you. Well done, I'll be interested to see how that pans out. ;-) --

878: 93: 3419:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3346:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3187:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

300:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00464.x/full

289:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00472.x/full

283:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00464.x/full

2763: 3280:

Talk:Circumcision#Where to write on "Forced circumcision of children"?

2398:. Thanks for the reminder. Sorry about the delay, I have been away. -- 1111:. I'm not sure if it's actually useful, but that's the way I think. -- 2861:

was being accused of an act of malice. But perhaps you are correct,

434:

You're right; it's time to act. I've invented a plan, and put it at

1701:

Thanks! Yes, I wish we could work at that level of scholarship. --

2961:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

2915:. Am currently thinking about how best to word my own support, . 2284:

Hello! There's a somewhat lengthy content-related discussion in

2184:

so the references don't confuse people putting in further edits.

3094: 1772:, is the warming..." but I'm not too attached to that either. -- 3422:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

3349:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

3190:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2650:

imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

25: 2666:, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is 2370: 2082:, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is 1894:

I like the addition of the word 'system'. Love it in fact. --

942:

I'm not sure what to do about this editor; see, for example,

1320:" regarding an issue in which you may have been involved. -- 802: 1287:

Oops, sorry. My mistake. Fixed. Thanks for the heads-up. --

472:

commented on such issues when dealing with student editors.

3223:

International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea

567:

Can you explain how footnote 7 differs from footnote 9 in

503:

Okay, Nigel. Thanks for the feedback and additional help.

3093:

Dear Nigelj, thanks for improving my edit to the article

809:

Hello, Nigelj. Please check your email; you've got mail!

3403:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3330:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3171:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3037: 3013: 2912: 1699: 1657: 1650: 1600:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

1504:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1450:

Not at all. Absolutely right. Good work. Thanks. :-) --

1432: 1428: 1188: 1092:, whether you comment there or here on your talk page? 1089: 947: 886: 814: 471: 436:

Talk:Counterculture of the 1960s#Pruning the chronology

202: 139: 101: 3270:

Asking for a more detailed answer on article talk page

2762:

I added a talk page section to address your concerns:

2736:

as I was reverting edits by a block evading ip. I see

2182:

Talk:Global warming controversy#HadCRUT close-in graph

1433:

our collective housekeeping comments so I deleted them

176:

I usually don't like being those things, which helps.

2322:. Thanks for the heads-up. Keep up the good work. -- 2212:

Thoughts? Please comment on the article talk page.

1606:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

414: 2366:based on new informations (January 2015) from NASA 2286:Talk:Linux distribution § Information on GNU/Linux 2156:Thanks for removing that biased nonsense from the 2127:is subject to a 1 revert per 24 hour restriction. 1925:the hatnote to the 'Global warming' article over. 1800:You're doing a great job over there. Well done. -- 1695:Thanks for the clarification on Talk:Deepak Chopra 633:I can credit you to the image if you want that... 2953:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 253:Life cycle CO2 emissions by energy source article 2280:A discussion on the Linux distribution talk page 2732:Apologies for missing your intervening edit on 1820:Thanks for comments and please keep them coming 885:Perhaps you are interested in taking a stab at 2688:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 2369:Thank you very much (in Commons ad Czech Wiki 2362:Hi, please, could you make a new svg chart of 2358:Could you prepare new chart of global warming? 2105:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 2600:. There are two parallel efforts, one in the 2209:You edited the article and/or the talk page. 1496:Disambiguation link notification for March 28 528:FYI I mentioned your name on a user talkpage 361:Hi, in my opinion an editor has hijacked the 8: 273:page, if that is what you find contentious. 3278:, you have posted an uncompleted answer in 2857:I may have been reaching. I "assume" that 1619:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Negligible 2633:Discretionary sanctions notification - CAM 2588:I invite you to look at the discussion at 1431:there was no purpose any more for some of 891:discussions about having a urination image 2658:The Arbitration Committee has authorised 2070:The Arbitration Committee has authorised 1232: 1935:"For changes in climate in general, see 2654:Please carefully read this information: 2067:Please carefully read this information: 1880:first sentence plus the word "system". 415:'60s Counterculture Timeline Notability 2664:Complementary and Alternative Medicine 96:article, a discussion on its talk page 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2590:Talk:Forces on sails#Expert attention 862:Talk:Global warming conspiracy theory 761:sorry that you wanted to say that. -- 100:Hey, Nigel. Maybe if you weigh in on 7: 3392:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 3319:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 3217:See this article of earlier interest 3160:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 2054:Discretionary sanctions notification 813: 2364:File:Global_Temperature_Anomaly.svg 1608:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 1084:moved to Casual sexual relationship 3376:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 3303:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 1015:As soon as another editor reverted 341:Wrong venue - use article talk. -- 24: 2979:review the candidates' statements 2522:History of climate change science 1617:The article will be discussed at 3381: 3308: 3149: 2740:has already corrected my error. 2638: 2596:, which I have just tied to the 2389: 2313: 2059: 1593: 1502:Global warming conspiracy theory 1401:If it looks like I responded at 1307: 1233: 1183:You misread what the source says 913: 29: 3426:and submit your choices on the 3353:and submit your choices on the 2662:to be used for pages regarding 2074:to be used for pages regarding 1314:Arbitration Enforcement Request 1206:Hi. I have copied this note to 1146:We get there in the end. :-) -- 265:Or is it (2) you don't believe 3136:15:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC) 2985:. For the Election committee, 2955:Arbitration Committee election 2946:ArbCom elections are now open! 2839:You're reaching when you just 2194:08:18, 24 September 2014 (UTC) 2170:01:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC) 1121:13:14, 23 September 2013 (UTC) 1102:06:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC) 1: 3442:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 3405:Knowledge arbitration process 3389:Hello, Nigelj. Voting in the 3332:Knowledge arbitration process 3316:Hello, Nigelj. Voting in the 3221:See the latest Talk entry at 3210:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 3173:Knowledge arbitration process 3157:Hello, Nigelj. Voting in the 3033:Your use of the rollback tool 3000:Changes to Occupy Wall Street 2995:12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2598:Knowledge:WikiProject Sailing 2551:N, fyi, see their talk page. 2447:19:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 2432:17:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 2272:16:33, 11 December 2014 (UTC) 2257:16:07, 11 December 2014 (UTC) 2241:15:58, 11 December 2014 (UTC) 2179:I put a <references /: --> 1488:18:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 1474:17:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 1460:17:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 1445:17:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 1361:Category:Slang terms for men‎ 1355:Category:Slang terms for men‎ 1330:10:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1297:20:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1282:20:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1260:11:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1075:19:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC) 1035:18:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC) 953:I should not bite the newbies 376:09:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 351:09:48, 13 February 2013 (UTC) 245:00:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC) 235:00:21, 13 February 2013 (UTC) 225:00:14, 13 February 2013 (UTC) 210:00:10, 13 February 2013 (UTC) 186:23:56, 12 February 2013 (UTC) 167:23:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC) 152:23:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC) 134:23:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC) 119:19:45, 12 February 2013 (UTC) 3369:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 3298:19:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 3235:16:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC) 3069:23:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC) 3053:21:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC) 2939:18:57, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 2924:18:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 2408:22:34, 23 January 2015 (UTC) 2383:10:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC) 2350:11:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2332:11:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2307:06:53, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2222:13:28, 6 November 2014 (UTC) 1830:just posted ver 5 of my idea 1418:16:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC) 1392:02:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC) 1249:Thanks for creating the new 1220:23:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC) 1201:22:44, 27 October 2013 (UTC) 818:at any time by removing the 3194:and submit your choices on 3008:16:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC) 2981:and submit your choices on 2180:just after your comment at 1350:15:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 1243:The Food and Drink Barnstar 1175:21:54, 8 October 2013 (UTC) 1156:21:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC) 1141:21:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC) 1000:07:02, 18 August 2013 (UTC) 985:06:57, 18 August 2013 (UTC) 969:04:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC) 932:22:08, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 907:19:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 366:the talk page also. thanks 3459: 3434:MediaWiki message delivery 3361:MediaWiki message delivery 3264:11:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC) 3202:MediaWiki message delivery 3192:the candidates' statements 3089:Articles on Ship Stability 3083:00:33, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 3027:16:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC) 2987:MediaWiki message delivery 2750:22:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC) 2628:17:55, 27 March 2015 (UTC) 2576:20:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 2561:19:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 2537:19:04, 16 March 2015 (UTC) 2509:17:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC) 2494:16:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC) 2478:15:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC) 1651:have been mentioned on ... 1644:06:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 1579:09:50, 16 April 2014 (UTC) 1564:02:02, 16 April 2014 (UTC) 1544:08:54, 28 March 2014 (UTC) 1429:IP's choice to self-revert 873:13:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC) 851:05:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC) 569:Global warming controversy 513:22:26, 31 March 2013 (UTC) 499:21:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC) 484:17:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC) 332:) 07:25, 13 February 2013‎ 2895:20:25, 20 June 2015 (UTC) 2880:20:21, 20 June 2015 (UTC) 2853:19:57, 20 June 2015 (UTC) 2835:19:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC) 2820:19:33, 20 June 2015 (UTC) 2797:19:04, 20 June 2015 (UTC) 2723:07:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC) 2147:13:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC) 2046:22:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 2032:21:10, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 2017:11:20, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 1996:07:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 1982:22:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 1966:is the blah blah blah..." 1954:21:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 1904:21:43, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 1890:21:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 1872:21:24, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 1857:19:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 1842:19:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 1810:08:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 1796:23:34, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 1782:23:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 1759:22:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 1372:Categories for discussion 1239: 786:21:59, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 771:21:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 752:18:35, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 733:18:06, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 718:17:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 557:21:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 542:21:28, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 448:01:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 429:23:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 407:14:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 392:11:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 3246:ftp://localhost/afd.html 2227:hopefully gentle inquiry 1711:19:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 1690:05:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 1670:00:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC) 1610:or whether it should be 1008:Global warming talk page 698:02:01, 3 July 2013 (UTC) 677:10:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC) 657:04:14, 7 June 2013 (UTC) 615:22:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 599:21:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 583:20:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 2777:15:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC) 2660:discretionary sanctions 2336:Thank you very much! — 2072:discretionary sanctions 1193:Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia 683:Thanks for the welcome! 521:your name was mentioned 454:User:Katieskyv and the 438:. What do you think? -- 267:Generation III reactors 260:Generation III reactors 2162:Tharthandorf Aquanashi 2123:Please also note that 1768:, also referred to as 1658:have been mentioned on 1556:Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 1312:There is currently an 1208:the relevant talk page 807: 271:Generation III reactor 3401:Arbitration Committee 3328:Arbitration Committee 3169:Arbitration Committee 3142:ArbCom Elections 2016 2959:Arbitration Committee 2929:Oops! Thanks Dave. -- 2911:You may wish to sign 2682:standards of behavior 2592:and elsewhere in the 2099:standards of behavior 951:is a newbie and that 946:at this time. And he 860:Thanks for archiving 806: 623:Request Authorization 42:of past discussions. 2690:editing restrictions 2678:purpose of Knowledge 2107:editing restrictions 2095:purpose of Knowledge 1532:opt-out instructions 1374:page. Thank you.. -- 1367:the category's entry 205:. Hope that was OK. 3284:Forced circumcision 2963:arbitration process 1514:fix with Dab solver 1226:A barnstar for you! 1127:Your thank-you note 1082:Casual relationship 464:User talk:Katieskyv 456:Non-penetrative sex 3417:arbitration policy 3344:arbitration policy 3185:arbitration policy 3144:: Voting now open! 3105:Metacentric height 2975:arbitration policy 2290:Linux distribution 2175:References in talk 1828:. Please note I 1549:Exception Handling 1522:• Join us at the 815:remove this notice 808: 776:you are involved. 636:Best Wishes FT56 357:Requesting opinion 2805:talk page stalker 2516:talk page stalker 1527: 1390: 1265: 1264: 1107:I made a comment 1088:Your thoughts on 1043:talk page stalker 948:finally responded 944:his contributions 660: 643:comment added by 334: 320:comment added by 90: 89: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3450: 3385: 3312: 3153: 3126:thanks again, -- 3075:NewsAndEventsGuy 3046: 2845:NewsAndEventsGuy 2812:NewsAndEventsGuy 2808: 2642: 2553:NewsAndEventsGuy 2529:NewsAndEventsGuy 2519: 2424:NewsAndEventsGuy 2397: 2393: 2392: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2264:NewsAndEventsGuy 2233:NewsAndEventsGuy 2125:Rupert Sheldrake 2063: 2038:NewsAndEventsGuy 2009:NewsAndEventsGuy 1974:NewsAndEventsGuy 1882:NewsAndEventsGuy 1849:NewsAndEventsGuy 1834:NewsAndEventsGuy 1788:NewsAndEventsGuy 1751:NewsAndEventsGuy 1731:, also known as 1642: 1638: 1633: 1597: 1596: 1517: 1510:check to confirm 1480:NewsAndEventsGuy 1437:NewsAndEventsGuy 1423:Hope you approve 1415: 1410: 1381: 1378: 1342:NewsAndEventsGuy 1311: 1310: 1257:Northamerica1000 1237: 1230: 1229: 1067:NewsAndEventsGuy 1046: 1019:Lawrence Summers 921: 917: 916: 865:NewsAndEventsGuy 839: 837: 831: 827: 821: 817: 805: 659: 637: 612: 607: 580: 575: 534:NewsAndEventsGuy 333: 314: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:User talk:Nigelj 3458: 3457: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3386: 3378: 3373: 3372: 3313: 3305: 3272: 3242: 3219: 3214: 3213: 3197:the voting page 3154: 3146: 3091: 3044: 3035: 3002: 2983:the voting page 2949: 2909: 2802: 2784: 2757: 2734:Transition town 2730: 2702: 2701: 2643: 2635: 2625:User:HopsonRoad 2619:Reorganization? 2606:and one in the 2586: 2583:Forces on sails 2549: 2513: 2460:User:BruceGrubb 2455: 2416: 2390: 2388: 2360: 2314: 2312: 2282: 2229: 2201: 2177: 2154: 2121: 2120: 2064: 2056: 1924: 1921: 1822: 1718: 1697: 1677: 1654: 1634: 1629: 1627: 1598: 1594: 1591: 1551: 1524:DPL WikiProject 1498: 1425: 1413: 1408: 1399: 1376: 1357: 1337: 1308: 1305: 1270: 1228: 1187:Hi, your edit, 1185: 1129: 1086: 1040: 1023:Joseph Stiglitz 1010: 940: 914: 912: 883: 858: 840: 835: 829: 825: 823:You've got mail 819: 811: 803: 800: 705: 703:For the article 685: 638: 625: 610: 605: 578: 573: 565: 523: 460: 417: 359: 315: 258:emissions from 255: 200: 173:MikeFromCanmore 98: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3456: 3454: 3424:the candidates 3387: 3380: 3379: 3377: 3374: 3351:the candidates 3314: 3307: 3306: 3304: 3301: 3271: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3241: 3238: 3218: 3215: 3155: 3148: 3147: 3145: 3139: 3121: 3120: 3114: 3111:Ship stability 3108: 3090: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3071: 3034: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3004:can you help? 3001: 2998: 2952: 2948: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2908: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2882: 2783: 2780: 2756: 2755:Solution Stack 2753: 2729: 2726: 2684:, or relevant 2644: 2637: 2636: 2634: 2631: 2585: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2548: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2454: 2453:Climate change 2451: 2450: 2449: 2422:, if you wish 2415: 2414:FYI SPI opened 2412: 2411: 2410: 2359: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2281: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2228: 2225: 2200: 2197: 2176: 2173: 2153: 2150: 2101:, or relevant 2080:fringe science 2065: 2058: 2057: 2055: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1964:CLIMATE CHANGE 1942: 1941: 1940: 1937:Climate change 1933: 1930:Climate change 1922: 1919: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1826:Global warming 1821: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1770:climate change 1766:Global warming 1733:climate change 1729:Global warming 1717: 1714: 1696: 1693: 1676: 1675:Solar Roadways 1673: 1653: 1647: 1592: 1590: 1585:Nomination of 1583: 1582: 1581: 1550: 1547: 1497: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1462: 1424: 1421: 1398: 1395: 1356: 1353: 1336: 1333: 1318:Barleybannocks 1304: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1274:Barleybannocks 1269: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1246: 1245: 1240: 1238: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1184: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1159: 1158: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1085: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 939: 936: 935: 934: 882: 876: 857: 854: 810: 801: 799: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 778:ChrisGualtieri 744:ChrisGualtieri 710:ChrisGualtieri 704: 701: 684: 681: 680: 679: 665: 624: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 589:Sorted now. -- 564: 561: 560: 559: 522: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 459: 452: 451: 450: 416: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 358: 355: 354: 353: 338: 337: 336: 335: 297: 296: 254: 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 237: 199: 196: 195: 194: 193: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 97: 91: 88: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3455: 3444: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3431: 3430: 3425: 3420: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3397: 3394: 3393: 3384: 3375: 3371: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3357: 3352: 3347: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3324: 3321: 3320: 3311: 3302: 3300: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3247: 3239: 3237: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3227:73.210.155.96 3224: 3216: 3212: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3198: 3193: 3188: 3186: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3165: 3162: 3161: 3152: 3143: 3140: 3138: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3124: 3118: 3115: 3112: 3109: 3106: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3098: 3096: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3051: 3048: 3047: 3039: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3015: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3007: 2999: 2997: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2947: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2906: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2887:Capitalismojo 2883: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2872:Capitalismojo 2868: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2827:Capitalismojo 2823: 2822: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2806: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2789:Capitalismojo 2781: 2779: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2769:Arbalest Mike 2766: 2765: 2760: 2754: 2752: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2727: 2725: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2707: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2656: 2655: 2651: 2649: 2641: 2632: 2630: 2629: 2626: 2623:. Sincerely, 2622: 2620: 2615: 2611: 2610: 2605: 2604: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2584: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2546: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2527: 2523: 2517: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2466: 2461: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2396: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2365: 2357: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2320: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2291: 2287: 2279: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2226: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2210: 2207: 2206: 2198: 2196: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2174: 2172: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2151: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2131: 2126: 2118: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2087: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2076:pseudoscience 2073: 2068: 2062: 2053: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2014: 2010: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1970: 1965: 1961: 1960: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1938: 1934: 1931: 1927: 1926: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1819: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1725: 1721: 1715: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1694: 1692: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1674: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1662:141.218.35.19 1659: 1652: 1648: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1639: 1637: 1632: 1623: 1620: 1615: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1604: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1548: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1528: 1525: 1521: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1506:Martin Durkin 1503: 1495: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1422: 1420: 1419: 1416: 1411: 1404: 1396: 1394: 1393: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1373: 1369: 1368: 1363: 1362: 1354: 1352: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1335:Nice idea but 1334: 1332: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1303:WP:ARE notice 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1267: 1261: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1244: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1182: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1083: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1050: 1044: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1007: 1001: 997: 993: 988: 987: 986: 982: 978: 973: 972: 971: 970: 966: 962: 958: 954: 949: 945: 938:User:DMan2013 937: 933: 929: 925: 920: 911: 910: 909: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 887:these matters 880: 877: 875: 874: 870: 866: 863: 855: 853: 852: 848: 844: 834: 824: 816: 797: 787: 783: 779: 774: 773: 772: 768: 764: 759: 755: 754: 753: 749: 745: 740: 736: 735: 734: 730: 726: 722: 721: 720: 719: 715: 711: 702: 700: 699: 695: 691: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 663: 662: 661: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 634: 631: 628: 622: 616: 613: 608: 602: 601: 600: 596: 592: 587: 586: 585: 584: 581: 576: 570: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 545: 544: 543: 539: 535: 531: 526: 520: 514: 510: 506: 502: 501: 500: 496: 492: 488: 487: 486: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 433: 432: 431: 430: 426: 422: 408: 404: 400: 395: 394: 393: 389: 385: 380: 379: 378: 377: 373: 369: 364: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 339: 331: 327: 323: 322:Boundarylayer 319: 312: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 293: 292: 291: 290: 286: 284: 280: 277: 274: 272: 268: 263: 261: 252: 246: 243: 238: 236: 233: 228: 227: 226: 222: 218: 214: 213: 212: 211: 208: 204: 197: 187: 183: 179: 174: 170: 169: 168: 164: 160: 155: 154: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 136: 135: 131: 127: 123: 122: 121: 120: 116: 112: 107: 103: 95: 92: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3427: 3421: 3398: 3390: 3388: 3354: 3348: 3325: 3317: 3315: 3288: 3273: 3243: 3220: 3195: 3189: 3166: 3158: 3156: 3125: 3122: 3117:Weather helm 3099: 3092: 3045:Juliancolton 3042: 3036: 3003: 2950: 2913:this comment 2910: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2840: 2785: 2767: 2761: 2758: 2731: 2704: 2703: 2657: 2653: 2652: 2647: 2645: 2618: 2608: 2603:main article 2602: 2587: 2550: 2464: 2456: 2417: 2394: 2361: 2318: 2283: 2230: 2211: 2208: 2202: 2178: 2155: 2128: 2122: 2088: 2069: 2066: 2006: 1963: 1877: 1823: 1769: 1765: 1743: 1732: 1728: 1726: 1722: 1719: 1698: 1678: 1655: 1635: 1630: 1624: 1616: 1601: 1599: 1589:for deletion 1552: 1529: 1499: 1426: 1400: 1365: 1359: 1358: 1338: 1313: 1306: 1271: 1250: 1242: 1186: 1130: 1087: 1055: 1014: 1011: 941: 918: 884: 859: 856:mucho gracia 841: 738: 706: 686: 639:— Preceding 635: 632: 629: 626: 566: 527: 524: 468:WP:MAINSPACE 461: 418: 363:gift economy 360: 316:— Preceding 309: 298: 287: 281: 278: 275: 264: 256: 201: 198:I quoted you 99: 78: 43: 37: 3429:voting page 3356:voting page 3014:these edits 2501:John Carter 2470:John Carter 2375:81.19.4.215 2214:Thewhitebox 1720:Hi Nigelj, 1409:S Philbrick 895:Human penis 645:Flightime56 138:Thanks for 36:This is an 3413:topic bans 3340:topic bans 3181:topic bans 3128:KaiKemmann 3012:After all 2971:topic bans 2917:dave souza 2728:My apology 2674:uninvolved 2091:uninvolved 1737:Sphilbrick 1603:Negligible 1587:Negligible 1534:. Thanks, 1379:HairedGirl 1322:Iantresman 1049:Srich32977 690:Bksovacool 627:Hi NigelJ 606:SPhilbrick 574:SPhilbrick 525:Hi Nigel, 421:Learner001 242:Hans Adler 232:Hans Adler 207:Hans Adler 3409:site bans 3336:site bans 3290:Abir Babu 3177:site bans 2967:site bans 2738:user:NebY 2706:Callanecc 2594:Talk page 2158:Virginity 2130:Callanecc 1518:Read the 1268:Sheldrake 1252:Food swap 1047:My view, 957:WP:Mentor 897:article. 838:template. 563:Reversion 85:Archive 6 79:Archive 5 73:Archive 4 68:Archive 3 60:Archive 1 2715:contribs 2686:policies 2526:WP:ARBCC 2346:contribs 2303:contribs 2139:contribs 2103:policies 1747:contribs 1387:contribs 1063:WP:ARBCC 1059:contribs 879:Oral sex 653:contribs 641:unsigned 330:contribs 318:unsigned 94:Prostate 2621:section 2609:sandbox 2152:Thanks! 2036:Thanks 1612:deleted 1536:DPL bot 1370:on the 1094:Flyer22 1027:S. Rich 992:Flyer22 961:Flyer22 899:Flyer22 893:in the 881:article 843:Flyer22 664:Hi FT56 505:Flyer22 476:Flyer22 458:article 384:Tpylkkö 368:Tpylkkö 178:Flyer22 144:Flyer22 111:Flyer22 39:archive 3276:Nigelj 3256:Nigelj 3061:Nigelj 3019:Nigelj 2957:. The 2931:Nigelj 2841:assume 2742:Vsmith 2698:blocks 2680:, our 2614:WP:MOS 2568:Nigelj 2486:Nigelj 2465:doubts 2439:Nigelj 2400:Nigelj 2371:Pavouk 2338:Dsimic 2324:Nigelj 2295:Dsimic 2249:Nigelj 2115:blocks 2097:, our 2024:Nigelj 1988:Nigelj 1946:Nigelj 1923:extend 1896:Nigelj 1864:Nigelj 1802:Nigelj 1774:Nigelj 1682:GornDD 1571:Nigelj 1466:Nigelj 1452:Nigelj 1414:(Talk) 1397:timing 1383:(talk) 1340:FAQs. 1289:Nigelj 1212:Nigelj 1148:Nigelj 1113:Nigelj 1021:& 977:Nigelj 924:Nigelj 763:Nigelj 758:WP:AGF 725:Nigelj 669:Nigelj 611:(Talk) 591:Nigelj 579:(Talk) 549:Nigelj 491:Nigelj 440:Nigelj 399:Nigelj 343:Nigelj 217:Nigelj 159:Nigelj 126:Nigelj 124::-) -- 106:WP:MED 2696:, or 2203:See: 2113:, or 1920:bloat 1716:Query 1377:Brown 1109:there 311:power 16:< 3438:talk 3399:The 3365:talk 3326:The 3294:talk 3274:Hi, 3260:talk 3231:talk 3206:talk 3167:The 3132:talk 3095:Jibe 3079:talk 3065:talk 3038:This 3023:talk 2991:talk 2935:talk 2921:talk 2891:talk 2876:talk 2867:Some 2849:talk 2831:talk 2816:talk 2793:talk 2773:talk 2746:talk 2719:logs 2711:talk 2694:bans 2668:here 2572:talk 2557:talk 2533:talk 2524:and 2520:See 2505:talk 2490:talk 2474:talk 2443:talk 2428:talk 2420:here 2404:talk 2395:Done 2379:talk 2373:) -- 2342:talk 2328:talk 2319:Done 2299:talk 2268:talk 2253:talk 2237:talk 2218:talk 2190:talk 2186:Dmcq 2166:talk 2143:logs 2135:talk 2111:bans 2084:here 2078:and 2042:talk 2028:talk 2013:talk 1992:talk 1978:talk 1950:talk 1900:talk 1886:talk 1878:your 1868:talk 1853:talk 1838:talk 1806:talk 1792:talk 1778:talk 1755:talk 1741:talk 1707:talk 1703:Ronz 1686:talk 1666:talk 1656:You 1649:You 1636:4444 1575:talk 1560:talk 1540:talk 1484:talk 1470:talk 1456:talk 1441:talk 1346:talk 1326:talk 1293:talk 1278:talk 1216:talk 1197:talk 1171:talk 1167:TMCk 1152:talk 1137:talk 1133:TMCk 1117:talk 1098:talk 1090:this 1071:talk 1053:talk 1031:talk 996:talk 981:talk 965:talk 928:talk 922:;-) 919:Done 903:talk 869:talk 847:talk 798:Mail 782:talk 767:talk 748:talk 739:your 729:talk 714:talk 694:talk 673:talk 649:talk 595:talk 553:talk 538:talk 530:here 509:talk 495:talk 480:talk 444:talk 425:talk 403:talk 388:talk 372:talk 347:talk 326:talk 221:talk 203:here 182:talk 163:talk 148:talk 140:this 130:talk 115:talk 102:this 3240:www 2951:Hi, 2907:Sig 2782:NPA 2648:not 1631:KDS 1520:FAQ 1385:• ( 1065:. 833:ygm 828:or 688:it. 571:?-- 3440:) 3432:. 3411:, 3367:) 3359:. 3338:, 3296:) 3262:) 3233:) 3208:) 3200:. 3179:, 3134:) 3097:. 3081:) 3067:) 3049:| 3025:) 3017:-- 2993:) 2969:, 2937:) 2919:, 2893:) 2878:) 2851:) 2833:) 2818:) 2795:) 2775:) 2748:) 2721:) 2717:• 2713:• 2692:, 2670:. 2574:) 2559:) 2547:IP 2535:) 2507:) 2492:) 2476:) 2445:) 2430:) 2406:) 2381:) 2348:) 2344:| 2330:) 2305:) 2301:| 2293:— 2270:) 2255:) 2239:) 2220:) 2192:) 2168:) 2145:) 2141:• 2137:• 2109:, 2086:. 2044:) 2030:) 2015:) 1994:) 1980:) 1952:) 1944:-- 1939:." 1932:." 1902:) 1888:) 1870:) 1855:) 1840:) 1808:) 1794:) 1780:) 1757:) 1709:) 1688:) 1668:) 1614:. 1577:) 1562:) 1542:) 1512:| 1486:) 1472:) 1458:) 1443:) 1348:) 1328:) 1295:) 1280:) 1218:) 1199:) 1173:) 1154:) 1139:) 1119:) 1100:) 1073:) 1033:) 998:) 983:) 975:-- 967:) 930:) 905:) 871:) 849:) 836:}} 830:{{ 826:}} 820:{{ 784:) 769:) 750:) 731:) 716:) 696:) 675:) 655:) 651:• 597:) 555:) 540:) 511:) 497:) 482:) 446:) 427:) 405:) 390:) 374:) 349:) 328:• 223:) 184:) 165:) 157:-- 150:) 132:) 117:) 64:← 3436:( 3363:( 3292:( 3258:( 3229:( 3204:( 3130:( 3077:( 3063:( 3021:( 2989:( 2933:( 2889:( 2874:( 2863:I 2859:I 2847:( 2829:( 2814:( 2807:) 2803:( 2791:( 2771:( 2744:( 2709:( 2570:( 2555:( 2531:( 2518:) 2514:( 2503:( 2488:( 2472:( 2441:( 2426:( 2402:( 2377:( 2340:( 2326:( 2297:( 2266:( 2251:( 2235:( 2216:( 2188:( 2164:( 2133:( 2040:( 2026:( 2011:( 1990:( 1976:( 1948:( 1898:( 1884:( 1866:( 1851:( 1836:( 1804:( 1790:( 1776:( 1753:( 1744:· 1739:( 1705:( 1684:( 1664:( 1573:( 1558:( 1538:( 1526:. 1508:( 1482:( 1468:( 1454:( 1439:( 1389:) 1344:( 1324:( 1316:" 1291:( 1276:( 1214:( 1195:( 1169:( 1150:( 1135:( 1115:( 1096:( 1069:( 1056:· 1051:( 1045:) 1041:( 1029:( 994:( 979:( 963:( 926:( 901:( 867:( 845:( 780:( 765:( 746:( 727:( 712:( 692:( 671:( 647:( 593:( 551:( 536:( 507:( 493:( 478:( 442:( 423:( 401:( 386:( 370:( 345:( 324:( 313:. 219:( 180:( 161:( 146:( 128:( 113:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index