779:
conditioning. And, have you ever walked into a room in your house in the middle of winter, where the room had been un-occupied (with its lights off) for at least several hours? Unless the heating vents are opened wide (heating the room disproportionally from the rest of the house), the room is probably several degrees colder than other rooms that you've been occupying (with their lights on). After being in the room (with the lights on) for an hour or so, the room won't be nearly as cold. My point was that if the whole house is lighted with CFL lights, then NONE of the rooms will be heated up as much by the lights as they would have been with incandescent lights, so the furnace will have to work more to heat the house to the same temperature. As you pointed out, minor differences such as the location of the thermostat may make significant differences, but my point still stands: If the furnace has to make up the difference between the heat output of incandescent lights vs. CFL lights, the whole house is affected, not just occupied rooms. Normally one would think the thermostat would be in a typically occupied room, and since that room is now lighted with CFL bulbs, the furnace is now pumping out more heat to the WHOLE house to make up for the difference, and even unoccupied rooms are now being heated more, which would waste far more energy than the incandescent lights would have "wasted" in the first place. Of course this condition only exists during the portion of the year when the home's thermostat is set to 'heat', the reverse condition exists when the home's air condition is in service (and the CFL bulbs come out shining as real energy-saving heros during that period). One would hope that CFL-related energy savings during the summer exceed CFL-related energy losses during the winter, or else we're really doing ourselves & the environment a disservice by using CFL at all.
775:
bulbs are "eco friendly", making us all feel better about it at the same time. But they mention nothing about the fact that these bulbs will save NO energy AT ALL; none, nada; if they're used, for example, inside the heated living quarters of the
Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station or any other buildings that are constantly heated anyway. ALL of the "wasted" energy of a conventional bulb serves to reduce the heating requirements of the building's furnace, and energy efficient bulbs merely make the furnace run more to make up the difference. An energy efficient bulb in that environment will cost its user more than the equivalent incandescent bulbs over the same period of time, and will save no energy at all. The only difference would be due to the bulb (obviously) using electricity, while the furnace uses another form of fuel, and the relative cost differences for the same amount of energy between the two energy sources.
103:
in the 16th century the term "public" education came into use in a similar fashion to the word "public house" (pub), i.e. a house that was open to the public. Prior to the 16th century education of other than the nobility was only available to a very few people through the religious orders. In the 16th century, as a result of the reformation and the rise of
Protestantism, the idea that an educated populace might be desirable began to take hold, and grammar schools--public-schools--became established in order that the children of the growing middle class might receive as good an education as had previously only been available to the people in the very top stratum of society. Public schools were established throughout England, even in small towns, for example the
640:, by putting them in double square brackets; open those related articles too and get more background (you can't cite a wikipedia article, but you can see what citations have been used in the other article and lift them into ours). Maybe lift some stuff out of the existing lede for your section, and finally summarise what you end up with where this used to be mentioned at the top. You don't have to do this in one edit, take it in steps and save each bit with a suitable edit summary, keeping the article readable while you do so. And enjoy! Welcome to wikipedia, to being a wikipedian, and to encyclopedia building. Do ask if you want any more pointers. Oh, alternatively, you could just delete that little section and work on something else, that's up to you. --
1674:: "It's reasonable to assume that changes in the sun's energy output would cause the climate to change, since the sun is the fundamental source of energy that drives our climate system. Indeed, studies show that solar variability has played a role in past climate changes. For example, a decrease in solar activity is thought to have triggered the Little Ice Age between approximately 1650 and 1850, when Greenland was largely cut off by ice from 1410 to the 1720s and glaciers advanced in the Alps. But several lines of evidence show that current global warming cannot be explained by changes in energy from the sun.")
616:, summarise the main points in the article. Therefore having a short section on MIME/internet media type in the article, and a brief mention in the lede is exactly what we should have. The trouble is, someone else added it only to the lede in the past, and now we have a summary there that is longer than the section you created. One option is to swap the text by copy and paste, and maybe tidy it up a bit. The brief mention should use the new terminology (internet media type), while the longer section could mention both this and the older name
1792:
them, and use them when they do formal writing. I'm a little saddened, if what you did represents any kind of official policy, that
Knowledge is going to be working against us on that front. I understand that the words I changed are acceptable in everyday speech, but I'm chagrined that you would revert my changes, as if there were something wrong with what I did. This contributes to students' getting the impression that correct grammar doesn't really matter, "See? Knowledge said you were *wrong* and removed your silly edits." --
2047:
be stronger saying something more like "If you do not want your writing to be altered, hacked about, deleted and copied mercilessly, then do not submit it here." But, I don't think I can comply with your request as you state it. What I can do is, if you tell me where you are planning to put it, I can watchlist whatever page or pages you choose, and give you every support as you try to reinstate it, and help you properly to source it, and to build it in relevantly.
620:, for example. The trouble for me is that I can't think of anything else to say on the subject, so that section may always be a bit thin. Perhaps a bit of research in the RFC or elsewhere on the web may show up alternative, old, deprecated or related MIME, errr, internet media types to mention in the section, or something else related, that is noteworthy and interesting to add. The point to remember is that everything we add to an article must be
31:
1891:
180:
with each method that counts. Back to PUT and POST, the only essential difference is that PUT should be idempotent while POST is not. However, not all updates are idempotent. If you use PUT for such situation, a user would wrongly assume that repeated PUTs would give them the same result but in fact it is not. In situation like this, POST should be used because it conveys the correct semantics.
1767:' and removed the rest so that it wasn't a potentially confusing mixture. I suppose you could argue that the others are only examples and not strictly covered by WP:SELF, but the best place to do that would be on the article talk page rather than here, so that other editors can comment too. Please feel free to copy this thread there if you like, to start the discussion if you want to pursue it. --
1522:. I didn't know that was going on, so thanks for the heads-up. I don't have a strong opinion on the median questions, and, at the moment, I don't feel that I have any insights or perspectives to offer that may help settle, clarify or defuse the disagreements. I'll keep following the debate and thinking about it; if I think of anything that may help, I'll drop it in. --
1656:
that is the only kind that is occurring. If we limit the article to anthropogenic, we leave open the possibility that there is also non-anthropogenic (natural) CC or GW. Since NASA and NOAA and the IPCC, et al, don't believe there is any significant natural warming now, we don't want to open that possibility.
2088:
Also there's the efficiency of senior editors knowing how to quickly fork a page or relocate content, vs. the junior editors who might not even know what other options exist. Can't a page could be somehow forked then have overlapping content redacted. That still gives the "deleting" editor power to
948:
and felt obliged to comment. It is quite obvious that there is indeed a class of adjectives which are capitalised as though they were proper nouns: "English" is an excellent example. I would suggest that both "Web service" and "rich
Internet application" are correctly capitalised (although the latter
770:
regarding how energy efficient bulbs may not save nearly as much energy as we're made to believe. I thought my addition, though not explicitly cited, went along well with the previous citation. For those not familiar with the concept (and since most people would not bother to look up the citation's
2113:
People stop contributing to
Knowledge because of aggressive deletes. A Sr. volunteer who understands everything might think that's acceptable, but then I hear the Knowledge founders worrying about participation rates, etc. Without compromising the quality standards, there's got to be more that can
2046:
I understand your pain - I have had large amounts of my own text radically altered and outright deleted over the years. Under the edit box it currently says, "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here." I'm sure in the past that used to
2040:
was cited as the {main} article on the topic. That article might benefit from more prose - it is heavily tagged as needing review, and is largely in tabular form. I have been upset in the past, however, when an editor I've never heard from suddenly turns up on an article that I watchlist and dumps a
2030:
That was not the primary reason I deleted it, however. That reason was that it was largely irrelevant in the article where it was placed. If I put it somewhere else, I would have to go and find reliably sourced reasons why as to it is relevant there. That is not the way I normally write article text
1655:
Hi. Thank you for your reasoned response to my sincere but perhaps overly forceful question on the talk page. I really don't want to clutter that page so I'll clutter yours.Ā :-) If I understand you correctly, you believe attaching the word "anthropogenic" to present-day CC or GW is redundant because
1269:
page. I still have major issues with that page: 1) needs better discussion of the DANGERS of undampened (and otherwise unlimited) positive feedback in dynamic systems, 2) the preamble should begin w/a clear assertion: "Positive feedback IS -----"... Anyway, we'll come back to that... On one issue,
1199:
of yours today, which was surely for the best. I would say that whenever you have to decide whether to say 'Arthur' or 'Mr Rubin' - scratch the whole sentence and talk about the article text, the source text, and not much else. (I believe it's actually 'Dr'). You never know how specific diffs may be
1101:
The
Education and skills Act 2008 raises the leaving age to 17 in 2013, and 18 by 2015. There are alternatives to school, but dropping out is not one of them. that seems to me to make it "compulsory". I did try to revert your edit and refer to the act in the note, but my work firewall is blocking
323:
Thank you, I see your point. I'll go away and research how best to transfer text to wiki. Ref one of your points, the general flow does not go with the main article, could you suggest where the edit might be placed on Wiki. I'm the author of the document, there is no copyright concern. I realise the
102:
You undid my addition with the comment "No, that's just unnecessary confusion. What you refer to is called "home education" in UK. " Perhaps I didn't make my point clearly, but I was referring to the historical derivation of the term "public" school in the UK. While what you write may be true today,
1983:
On a larger issue, I'm less likely to edit wikipedia these days due to the aggressive deleting of a few individuals. I've tried to follow guidelines better, and my stuff isn't normally deleted, but still there's the doubt in my mind "how much time am I wasting?" I also have a friend who's stopped
1720:
with all the influences that affect it. This view takes account of the massive time-delays involved and emphasises that even if we removed all the man-made components from BozMo's big sum today, the climate would continue to warm before cooling again. Because of positive feedbacks like water vapour
1295:
years ago now. In those days TTL logic chips (74xx) were the latest thing and C-MOS (40xx) wasn't available yet! Lecturers were very keen to draw the inner circuits of these early chips and make sure we were in no doubt (they have common-base transistors with multiple emitters!!!) When I first left
1278:
circuit, which would better show the positive-feedback
Schmitt effect. But NOW I see it!!!!! It is there.... For all these years, my eyes have seen an OR symbol, and substituted a static, logical representation for it in my mind, forgetting that there is a very live analog and non-linear electrical
774:
My concern & frustration is that packaging on virtually every CFL or LED bulb claims that they will save the consumer some specific dollar amount on their utility bills over the life of the bulb (neglecting differences in killowatt-hour billing rates). And of course the packaging says that the
179:
Methods by themselves are not idempotent. It is very common for people to use GET to do all sorts of non-safe things. By declaring a method as idempotent, you basically telling your users that calling the method repeatedly would give them the same result. So, what counts is the semantics implied
1715:
the other day in a different discussion: The net effect we are seeing is the tiny result left from a massive addition/subtraction sum. Some of the huge components in that sum are natural, and others are anthropogenic. The result is for warming, and wouldn't be (at the moment) if it weren't for the
491:
are very well done, improve readability, and strike a good balance of neutrality on what is apparently an emotionally charged topic for some people. Thanks for the time and effort you put into improving the article. In particular, I think the phrase "...one supporter of the incandescent light bulb
2080:
But where you say " I have had large amounts of my own text radically altered and outright deleted over the years...", that's not entirely applicable here. That content had lived in that article for some time, and been happily edited and added to by multiple users. I liked it so much that I was
1979:
My proof? It existed for quite a long time without causing problems. Many others added to it, including myself. I was useful, I discovered the deletion today when I wanted to review the info and went looking for it. It wasn't clearly wrong or profane. The only "violation" was your (seasoned)
778:
Of course most homes do not run their furnaces year-round, so the real savings is somewhere between "zero" and the stated savings on the CFL/LED bulb packaging, and of course dependent on the portion of the year that the home runs its furnace and the portion of the year that the home runs its air
611:
Now the edit. I'm going to link a few policy and guideline documents while I talk about it, as you might want to read these as you get more involved in editing - there's hundreds of them, but there's only a few that really matter day-to-day. The lede or lead of an article (the bit above the first
2084:
You mention "I'm not sure that it is my problem ...", I'm suggested that for long established and thriving content, maybe that statement isn't entirely true. Maybe it is still true in the "letter of the law", the official policy, but I think it's too easy to just delete things that others found
1987:
I understand the need to delete things sometimes. And people should learn the guidelines. And I'm sure being a volunteer editor that deletes things opens you up to rants, which I'm not trying to do here. And in a case like this, where content was generally accepted and expanded for quite some
1791:
page, which was based on the concept that the "singular they" is acceptable
English usage. In teaching writing, I try to impress upon my students that we have singular and plural pronouns for a reason. I like to see that even if the rules are broken often in colloquial speech, my students know
1240:
the real justification. Can you believe this? As I predicted, he claims there is a dispute; when asked what the dispute is about, he says there is unsourced content; when the sources are shown to him in the article, he says that's not the real reason for his dispute. How long is this nonsense
635:
So, I see these were your first few edits. You're on safe ground here - you're not trying to re-write the outcome of the second world war, for example - so I suggest that rather than I rush in and alter what you've done, I'll leave you to it. Have a read around the subject, make sure you're not
209:
to redefine what HTTP methods are for. In a RESTful interface, all PUT actions must be idempotent and POSTs are not. People have been defining GET and POST to do whatever they like in web applications and RPC web services for years, and the point of REST is that we look up how the existing HTTP
607:
First I moved your comment to the bottom - you can add new topics to the bottom of any talk page using the 'New section' link to the top right of the page. Then I signed it for you - you can sign and date your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking the 'signature and
660:
Would appreciate your help regarding this: "The ozone layer experiences the highest level of depletion on record as a result of cold temperatures in the
Northern Hemisphere last winter." which currently appears in the "in the news section" of the main page and strikes me as misleading.
1972:
I can see where the discussion of other formats was getting a bit long and a bit off topic, but it WAS useful information. But it could have been moved to another page, perhaps the comparison of data serialization formations, or split off into a page like "other json-like formats".
159:
Hi Mabdul, I too am a bit busy with 'real life' at the moment. I also had never heard of tkWWW until just now, but it does sound like it has a place in history. I've added it to my watchlist and will read up and try to help there starting next week. Thanks for the heads-up.
1455:
Can you explain what you mean by "simple, bald statement" about his eye color? Surely a source that indicates they used genetic analysis to figure out his eye color is more useful than that
Discovery reference with no real explanation of how they came to that conclusion?
356:
I'm sorry that you see this as an "opinionated swipe", but I'm not willing to butt heads with you over this issue. However, the blog post I quoted as source is an overview of some of the most influential web developers' negative reactions to the logo. Amongst them the
2092:
There's probably some way to amend policies or whatever, some committee.... ultimately senior editors should still be able to trim articles, it's the /dev/null of content then was around for a while and had multiple contributors that I think needs some "adjustment".
1519:
699:
Would you like me to send you a copy of the Spalding Guardian article that quotes Jones, that you removed from the CRU controversy page AWB? I have a local copy (which I had misfiled) on my desktop now. I just double-checked, and our quote is accurate.
2020:
says, "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." Therefore if I did so, policy says that I would become responsible for the accuracy, relevance and verifiability of every word of it. Part of my edit comment said, "no
2081:
motivated to add one additional subsection. At some point I'm suggesting that the burden ought to shift a bit. I'm not sure it should be a "rule", but I think the burden should shift as content becomes more and more established and contributed to.
1296:
college and worked in the industry, one product I bench-tested and calibrated all day was an alarm system with normal discreet transistors doing all the logic. In more recent years, I have baffled younger colleagues in software development by using
1515:
2152:
that discuss the idea that Windows .ini files, PHP array initializers etc might be (or were in the past) considered as universal data interchange formats, then I'll happily support you putting a summary into an appropriate article somewhere.
1222:. What do you make of this bizarre behavior? He insists that the maintenance tags should be added for no reason. How does one confront this kind of disruptive behavior? Is there something a bit "off" about this person or is it just me?
782:
I'm sorry if you thought my contribution was confusing; I thought it was pretty clear. Is there another wording of the same idea that you'd like to replace it with? I don't think the existing article adequately addresses this issue.
1270:
I just wanted to say thanks, and I stand corrected. I have been working around digital electronics for ~30 years, and only with this discussion have I finally understood how a latch works. I couldn't understand why you were showing a
771:
article), I was trying to make it clear why energy efficient bulbs may not actually save ANY energy in colder climates, and in fact may actually waste energy (perhaps depending on thermostat placement, as you pointed out).
1760:
Yes, there were a couple of self-refs that I felt really had to go - "consider the Knowledge page for this article..." and "(this Knowledge article is full of hyperlinks)". While I was at it, I introduced the recommended
1748:(as I read it) is designed to prevent people reading an article on an other website to feel lost (broken links, "this website", ...). I don't think using our domain as a little self promotion for the project hurtsĀ :). --
1662:: "During the past 50 years, the sum of solar and volcanic forcings would likely have produced cooling. Observed patterns of warming and their changes are simulated only by models that include anthropogenic forcings.")
107:
in Stratford-upon-Avon where Shakespeare received his superb education, one so good that even today people argue that his plays must have been written by someone else because he wasn't one of the "University Wits".
2109:
I suppose an editor could argue that they shouldn't be encumbered with such things, that it's the content that matters, etc etc. I would take some exception to that, or at least in terms of "move" vs. "delete".
443:
It doesn't really matter unless we get the IP saying, "I agree with Winkmann99" and Winkmann99 saying, "I agree with the IP". Without that, it's just one comment that somebody made - it doesn't really matter who.
632:. That's not so true of the summary in the lede - somewhere in the docs (can't find it now) it says that as long as the text in the section is well referenced and cited, there is no need to cite the summary too.
1859:
Awww, if I'd known you were all coming round, I'd have got some beer and crisps ready. No, I think I'll leave it alone now - it all makes little sense to the casual reader, but I think that's how it should be.
726:, all I did was find a BLP sentence sourced to a broken web-link. If you have a better source, offer it up for general discussion on the article talk page and let's see what the consensus is there. --
1692:
P.S. William's insertion of the graph supplied the timeline I was clamoring for, so my question about the word "anthropogenic" is more for my own understanding than to modify or improve the article.
1180:
in Mr. Rubin's "dispute". Please feel free to comment or make suggestions for moving forward. I will not be able to address statement 1 until sometime later tomorrow ("Global warming conspiracy").
546:
Hi Perhelion! I hadn't thought about that file for years! It was one of my first attempts at making hand-crafted SVGs. I just uploaded a new copy there to make the circle of life more completeĀ :-) --
2103:
May I ask, do you even notice when you're deleting the work of a half dozen or more people that other Knowledge users have found acceptable for months and months? Does that even enter into it?
214:
as defined. If the developer feels free to decide whether a PUT or a POST is going to be idempotent or not, s/he is not designing a RESTful interface (which is what the article is about). --
1836:
Use of the indicative rather than subjunctive mood in "as if there was something wrong" is the grammatical error, if we're going to be pedantic.Ā :-) I don't really care for that singular
1236:
To make matters worse, Arthur Rubin has moved the goal posts yet again, claiming that the justification for adding the maintenance tags he gave to JakeInJoisey at 22:50, 19 July is now
2031:- start with the text and look for sources as to why and where it might be useful. I normally start with reliable sources and summarise and combine them into well-sourced article text.
1668:
kind of change going on right now, and to specify that it is human-induced suggests a contrast to natural CC, which the experts say isn't happening now even though it has in the past.
1976:
When somebody is about to wholesale delete the work of many other people, I think the burden falls on the deleter to look for a new home for it, rather than just removing it.
636:
depending on unverifiable stuff from blogs, see what you can find, and see if you can make a nice little section out of what you started. Wikilink any terms you use, like
809:, but there's certainly no need to repeat it, let alone expand on it there, IMHO. In general terms, if you want to discuss edits to an article, it's best to do it on the
468:
Hello, I like your cut of your jibĀ !!. I have tried to raise a smile or three with a new related section on the Talk? (novelists corner, weepy show revisited) page.
266:
I tried to contribute an article only to discover you reverted my contribution. Could you explain your reason for doing this as I'm sure this issue can be resolved.
1034:
531:
talk? If yes, your are right (the PNG is better), but where is your SVG, you have not uploaded any file here? You know now, how you can upload files? Greetings --
2106:
Has there ever been any discussion about deleting that type of content? (vs. the "normal" deletes of spam or quickly removing 1 individual's off topic rants?)
1219:
1177:
723:
119:
1387:
354:... at "the distain of many standard evangelists", which is sourced to a personal blog that does not even mention "the distain of any standard evangelists")
2041:
couple of kilobytes of strange text into the middle of its flow, claiming they were told to do so by some merge or deletion discussion going on elsewhere.
813:
talk page so that other editors see the discussion and can join in. If you want to pursue this further, I suggest you start by copy and pasting it all to
1805:
814:
1555:
569:
I modified this page because I couldn't find the MIME type of JSON text. However now I see it's called Internet media type. Should my edit be removed?
1565:
1360:
1352:
104:
1804:
If you want a deep and meaningful discussion with me personally about this, I'm afraid you have the wrong person. Maybe some of the contributors to
1551:
744:
I posted a proposal to restore this at Talk, and thought I should also notify you, as that page has gotten pretty busy. See what you think. Thanks,
111:
This is explained in detail in the Oxford English Dictionary: "Public education, education at school as opposed to being privately 'educated' ..."
1436:
1398:
196:
1716:
human-contributed bits. There's yet another way of looking at this, that I haven't used here yet, which is to say that the current climate is
1561:
806:
767:
488:
1649:
1195:
Well done. I have to go out and do some RL stuff now, but I will look up those refs soon and comment specifically. Congratulations also on
1038:
334:
1808:
would be more interested. If however, you want to discuss the best wording of that precise passage, I think that starting a new thread at
722:
is quite clear, "Other reliable sources include magazines, journals, and mainstream newspapers." There is a section about this quote on
1335:
Not only are there plenty of people who understand this, but it's good that the minority see that there are plenty of us! Well found. --
1015:
901:
2099:
I'd like to ask you: If I loosely define "long lived and thriving content" as large parts of an article that have been around for : -->
1077:
Precisely. Those pictures are there, by consensus, to illustrate the article. As you have been told before, Knowledge is not censored.
2016:
Gosh, that was nearly a year ago. I'm not sure that it is my problem to find a new home for your material and paste it there. In fact
1929:
1368:
918:
866:
376:
If you want to discuss an article, please use the article talk page so that other editors may join in. This isn't about me. Or you. --
2136:
1496:
285:
1558:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
1011:
1004:
595:
2025:
discusses as alternatives to JSON". Therefore I don't believe that the material is reliably sourced in its year-old form.
1291:
I had totally forgotten this discussion! Glad it helped. I did electronics at university in the early 70s - that's nearly
1107:
473:
238:
916:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Large_Cities_Climate_Leadership_Group&diff=432283159&oldid=432278426
2100:
6 months, and have had at least 3 contributors (new content, not just edits), then how often is such content removed?
2037:
1012:
Talk:Climate_change_mitigation#Add_Climate_of_Denial:_Can_science_and_the_truth_withstand_the_merchants_of_poison.3F
1612:
1325:
1067:
528:
86:
81:
76:
64:
59:
38:
1721:
in the big sum, this could be quite marked and lengthy. Blah, blah. Don't start me offĀ :-) Thanks for the chat. --
1711:
found RS cites to back it up! (Thanks for thatĀ :-) It's not a hugely important viewpoint in my mind. BozMo wrote
1504:
2077:
I suspected the formal policy had something to that approximate affect. I'm not saying you violated a policy.
1103:
802:
192:
1042:
338:
301:. Since this isn't about me, and others have previously reverted your edit, I'll copy this discussion over to
1019:
905:
469:
429:
I didn't think of that. But if if you look as Winkmann99 contribs it doesn't really fit that user's pattern.
1472:
870:
1372:
1266:
922:
888:
681:
666:
188:
2132:
2001:
1430:
1392:
1364:
1321:
1078:
1063:
976:
954:
791:
434:
405:
358:
2124:
1500:
583:
575:
330:
281:
277:
273:
184:
1659:
1611:
Hi Nigelj! Just wanted to check if you had any comment on the revisions I proposed to the draft at
1246:
1227:
1185:
587:
536:
497:
302:
1793:
863:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:OhanaUnited&diff=421531280&oldid=421528249
1901:
1849:
1697:
1683:
1461:
591:
570:
366:
855:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Granitethighs&diff=prev&oldid=421531277
1797:
1623:
1581:
1543:
1283:
1146:
885:
881:
749:
708:
703:
This assumes I can figure out how to put a web page copy as an email attachmentĀ ;-] ... Best,
677:
662:
246:
1141:"s.... especially since I put in a couple of them (to replace something worse, ims.) Cheers,
1102:
my save of the page. Perhaps you would care to reverse your edit in the light of the above?
874:
2158:
2128:
2064:
2017:
1997:
1945:
1890:
1865:
1817:
1772:
1726:
1638:
1596:
1527:
1480:
1415:
1340:
1305:
1205:
1161:
1122:
1086:
992:
971:
950:
847:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Zodon&diff=429845197&oldid=429841834
822:
787:
731:
645:
551:
512:
449:
430:
420:
401:
381:
310:
219:
165:
149:
127:
47:
17:
1320:
Hi, You were faster than me... I clicked post and got an edit conflict response. Thanks
1988:
time, shouldn't that burden of finding a new home fall to the person doing the deleting?
1279:
circuit underneath.... Thanks for helping me correct this false-view I was carryingĀ :) --
1745:
1738:
1242:
1223:
1181:
629:
613:
532:
493:
2089:
remove things, but with just a bit more effort to them to find someplace else for it.
1520:
Knowledge talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/13 November 2011/Usage share of operating systems
1897:
1845:
1809:
1693:
1679:
1572:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1457:
1274:
circuit, which CLEARLY shows negative feedback, when you should really be showing an
897:
362:
2036:
Looking at the original article around the time of that edit of mine, it seems that
324:
text needs proof reading, which presents as poor punctuation and will work on this.
2149:
2022:
1924:
1619:
1577:
1573:
1297:
1280:
1142:
1029:
Per your edits of Climate change policy of the United States ... any Talk comments?
745:
704:
625:
242:
145:
1968:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=JSON&diff=418834420&oldid=418815901
1516:
Knowledge:Mediation Cabal/Cases/13 November 2011/Usage share of operating systems
2162:
2154:
2140:
2068:
2060:
2005:
1949:
1941:
1934:
1905:
1869:
1861:
1853:
1821:
1813:
1776:
1768:
1763:
1754:
1730:
1722:
1701:
1687:
1642:
1634:
1627:
1600:
1592:
1585:
1547:
1531:
1523:
1508:
1484:
1476:
1465:
1441:
1419:
1411:
1403:
1376:
1344:
1336:
1329:
1309:
1301:
1285:
1250:
1231:
1209:
1201:
1189:
1165:
1157:
1150:
1126:
1118:
1111:
1090:
1082:
1071:
1046:
1023:
996:
988:
981:
957:
926:
909:
891:
826:
818:
795:
753:
735:
727:
719:
712:
685:
670:
649:
641:
621:
599:
555:
547:
540:
516:
508:
501:
477:
453:
445:
438:
424:
416:
409:
385:
377:
370:
342:
314:
306:
289:
250:
223:
215:
169:
161:
154:
131:
123:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1963:
I see from you profile that you're a very experienced editor, way more than I.
1300:
to simplify the logic in complex if-statements. Thanks, Bill, and good luck. --
608:
timestamp' button just above the edit window (it looks like a pencil and an f).
1919:
361:(WaSP) -- and if those guys don't count as "standard evangelists", who do? --
1856:
Whoops--edit conflict there, it's gone, like this will be in a few minutes.
1633:
Hi again. I've added some thoughts there. Sorry I'm not being more help. --
1788:
1749:
1613:
Talk:Document Object Model#Explaining what the DOM is without being vague
1176:
Per your encouragement, I've started the first subsection addressing the
227:
P.S. I'm copying this to the article talk so that others may comment too.
144:
Hi, can you help me and take a short look at tkWWW article? Either I or
1033:
Per your edits of Climate change policy of the United States ... any
612:
subtitle, appearing above the contents listing) should, according to
122:, and replied there, so that others may also comment if they wish. --
1428:
Surely. Go see the SPI page again; now s/he's back at it as an IP. ā
1363:
regarding image. The image adds to the article, for some too much (
1062:
is not vandalism: I removed all real vulva images from the article.
837:
Anything to stop User:Arthur Rubin from deleting other's User Talk?
1956:
Nigel, please find a new home for content you deleted in March 2011
833:
Anything to stop User:Arthur Rubin from deleting other's User Talk?
1671:
1059:
1052:
138:
2096:
I did see your offer to me, and I'll likely take you up on that.
1475:
so that other editors there may have a say if they so choose. --
637:
1497:
Talk:Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Consensus_on_median_in_summary
841:(wp:Arthur Rubin) continues to hide other's Talk, this time on
1707:
Hi, yes, I think you have got exactly the point I was making.
1218:
he has added the maintenance tags back into the article twice
25:
297:
Hi Chris. After a bit of research, it appears that you mean
492:
is..." flows much better than my earlier attempted edit. --
805:. We could possibly summarise that treatment somewhere in
257:
1980:
opinion that it was off topic for that particular page.
1117:
OK, thanks for that. Re-inserted, with ref this time. --
801:
I think what you're trying to say is well summarised at
507:
Thank you so much. My very best wishes to you tooĀ :-) --
1967:
1712:
1546:, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page
1196:
968:
945:
915:
862:
854:
846:
397:
298:
2085:
useful. (which isn't the only criteria for WP, sure)
1840:
myself, but the feminists don't let us use the neuter
415:
Hmmm. I wonder if Winkmann99 just forgot to log in? --
1514:
Hmmm. I've just read through about 100K of debate at
718:
Hi. This isn't about me or convincing me personally.
305:
and reply there so that other editors can join in. --
1200:
used in the future... I learned that in the past. --
1828:That was a simple typo, Dave--s/he missed the "n":
628:reliable source, and referenced to that source per
483:
Nice job on "Phase-out of incandescent light bulbs"
949:is usually presented in title case in the wild).
951:Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work)
1035:Talk:Climate change policy of the United States
1787:A comment on your reversion of my edit to the
1265:Hi Nigel, I finally studied your reply on the
120:Talk:American and British English differences
8:
1918:I understand your concernĀ :-) No worries! --
803:Compact fluorescent lamp#Heating and cooling
527:Hey Nigelj, are you the IP from (2007) the
815:Talk:Phase-out of incandescent light bulbs
766:Just noticed that you reverted my edit of
2117:I do appreciate your discussion of this.
1361:Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change
1353:Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change
762:Question about your revert of my addition
578:comment added 16:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC).
239:Portal talk:Renewable energy#Task forceĀ ?
1966:I'm referring to the "bold deletion" on
95:American and British English differences
1678:There, I said it twice. Did I get it?
148:is not familiar with the wp rules. THX
1896:Thanks, Nigel; here's looking at you!
118:OK. I've copied your comment above to
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
807:Phase-out of incandescent light bulbs
768:Phase-out of incandescent light bulbs
489:Phase-out of incandescent light bulbs
7:
1650:Scientific opinion on climate change
24:
1615:? Thanks again for the feedback.
210:methods are defined and use them
1889:
1538:Disambiguation link notification
849:) ... on March 30th 2011 it was
205:Yes, that's the point of REST -
29:
2148:As I said, if you can find any
1991:Would you please address this?
1359:Thank you for your comments on
1351:Thank you for your comments on
1214:Thanks. Arthur Rubin has just
1137:Thanks for catching all those "
1010:Thank you for your comments on
1003:Thank you for your comments on
1800:) 20:52 29 January 2012 (UTC)
1560:For more information, see the
1442:22:10, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
1420:18:04, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
1404:16:08, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
1005:Talk:Climate_change_mitigation
1:
2163:11:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
2141:00:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
2069:18:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
2006:21:25, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
1643:17:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
1628:13:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
1377:19:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
517:22:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
502:21:23, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
487:I think your recent edits to
251:19:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
224:15:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
170:12:51, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
155:19:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
1950:21:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
1935:20:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
1906:00:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
1870:23:46, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
1854:23:39, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
1822:21:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
1806:this two-year-old discussion
1777:13:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
1755:11:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
1601:17:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
1586:11:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
1532:21:55, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
1509:18:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
1485:22:00, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
1466:21:22, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
1367:) ... further discusssion?
478:21:35, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
464:Radio - the American version
454:19:46, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
439:19:37, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
425:19:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
410:18:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
386:18:55, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
371:18:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
343:15:00, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
315:10:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
290:10:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
132:18:35, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
2038:Lightweight markup language
1783:Singular they and Knowledge
1731:15:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1702:11:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1688:11:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1664:You're saying there's only
1345:21:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
1330:21:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
967:I think you forgot to sign
624:verifiable to at least one
396:Did you notice this? An IP
233:Renewable energy task force
2179:
1812:would be more fruitful. --
987:Oops. Thanks. Fixed it. --
832:
650:18:08, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
600:16:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
556:22:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
541:19:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
199:) 00:53, 26 November 2010
1310:10:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
1286:01:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
1251:08:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
1232:08:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
1210:14:01, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
1190:13:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
1166:14:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
1151:19:33, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
1127:15:39, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
1112:14:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
1091:15:45, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
1072:12:38, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
1047:05:15, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
1024:07:41, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
997:21:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
982:18:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
914:If of interest, more ...
686:19:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
671:19:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
1591:Thanks Mr Bot. Fixed. --
1495:Could use your input on
958:10:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
927:04:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
910:20:54, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
892:19:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
875:16:50, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
827:21:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
796:21:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
754:04:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
692:Jones death threat quote
562:My edit of the JSON page
523:File:Diamond-caution.svg
398:impersonating Winkmann99
851:User talk:Granitethighs
736:22:29, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
713:20:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
1984:editing all together.
1564:or drop a line at the
1267:Talk:Positive feedback
724:the relevant talk page
676:Ignor me. Fixed now.--
258:http://www.zimbio.com/
1713:something much better
1365:Climate change denial
859:User talk:OhanaUnited
359:Web Standards Project
42:of past discussions.
2052:Thanks for your note
1607:Response at Talk:DOM
1574:opt-out instructions
349:rm opinionated swipe
175:RESTful web services
1940:Cool. ThanksĀ :-) --
1737:Self references on
1556:fix with Dab solver
1355:regarding image ...
1241:going to continue?
1104:Martin of Sheffield
937:"Proper adjectives"
529:Diamond-caution.svg
303:Talk:Geoengineering
1718:out of equilibrium
1658:(From p. 5 of the
1261:I stand corrected.
1133:Merchants of Doubt
1097:School leaving age
470:Francis E Williams
2144:
2127:comment added by
1911:
1910:
1744:Hi! Technically,
1675:
1663:
1569:
1544:Positive feedback
1473:article talk page
1444:
1406:
1386:Nigeljā FYI, see
1316:You beat me to it
1172:Comment requested
839:User:Arthur Rubin
603:
586:comment added by
333:comment added by
293:
276:comment added by
228:
201:
187:comment added by
105:King's New School
92:
91:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2170:
2150:reliable sources
2143:
2121:
1932:
1927:
1922:
1893:
1886:
1885:
1766:
1752:
1669:
1657:
1559:
1552:check to confirm
1471:Answered on the
1440:
1433:
1431:Scheinwerfermann
1410:D'oh! Thanks. --
1402:
1395:
1393:Scheinwerfermann
1322:NewsAndEventsGuy
1178:second statement
1064:ColderPalace1925
1058:My last edit to
979:
974:
602:
580:
579:
345:
292:
270:
226:
200:
181:
73:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
18:User talk:Nigelj
2178:
2177:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2122:
1958:
1930:
1925:
1920:
1916:
1884:
1882:A beer for you!
1785:
1762:
1750:
1742:
1653:
1609:
1566:DPL WikiProject
1540:
1501:Daniel.Cardenas
1493:
1453:
1439:
1429:
1401:
1391:
1384:
1357:
1318:
1263:
1174:
1135:
1099:
1056:
1031:
1008:
977:
972:
965:
939:
843:User Talk:Zodon
835:
798:
764:
694:
658:
581:
573:
564:
525:
485:
466:
400:at Talk:Vulva.
394:
351:
328:
271:
269:Regards Chris
261:
235:
189:124.178.228.149
182:
177:
142:
97:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2176:
2174:
2166:
2165:
2072:
2071:
2058:
2054:
2053:
2049:
2048:
2043:
2042:
2033:
2032:
2027:
2026:
2013:
2012:
1957:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1915:
1912:
1909:
1908:
1894:
1883:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1784:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1741:
1739:World Wide Web
1735:
1734:
1733:
1652:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1608:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1539:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1492:
1491:Please comment
1489:
1488:
1487:
1452:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1435:
1423:
1422:
1397:
1383:
1380:
1356:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1317:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1262:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1173:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1134:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1079:WP:NOTCENSORED
1055:
1050:
1039:99.181.140.243
1030:
1027:
1007:
1001:
1000:
999:
964:
961:
944:I came across
938:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
834:
831:
830:
829:
785:
763:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
739:
738:
693:
690:
689:
688:
657:
654:
653:
652:
633:
609:
563:
560:
559:
558:
524:
521:
520:
519:
484:
481:
465:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
393:
390:
389:
388:
350:
347:
335:86.132.223.135
318:
317:
260:
254:
234:
231:
230:
229:
176:
173:
141:
136:
135:
134:
96:
93:
90:
89:
84:
79:
74:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2175:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2151:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2118:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2104:
2101:
2097:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2075:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2059:
2056:
2055:
2051:
2050:
2045:
2044:
2039:
2035:
2034:
2029:
2028:
2024:
2019:
2015:
2014:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1994:Thanks, Mark
1992:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1974:
1970:
1969:
1964:
1961:
1960:Hello Nigel,
1955:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1933:
1928:
1923:
1913:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1892:
1888:
1887:
1881:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1858:
1857:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1844:anymore.Ā :-(
1843:
1839:
1835:
1834:teaching. . .
1833:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1810:Talk:Internet
1807:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1799:
1795:
1790:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1765:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1753:
1747:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1719:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1690:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1676:
1673:
1667:
1661:
1651:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1616:
1614:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1570:
1567:
1563:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1450:
1443:
1438:
1432:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1405:
1400:
1394:
1389:
1381:
1379:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1298:Karnaugh maps
1294:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1277:
1273:
1268:
1260:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1239:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1220:for no reason
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1028:
1026:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1016:99.190.81.239
1013:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
985:
984:
983:
980:
975:
973:Pass a Method
970:
962:
960:
959:
956:
952:
947:
942:
936:
928:
924:
920:
917:
913:
912:
911:
907:
903:
902:99.109.124.16
899:
895:
894:
893:
890:
887:
883:
879:
878:
877:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
840:
828:
824:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
799:
797:
793:
789:
784:
780:
776:
772:
769:
761:
755:
751:
747:
743:
742:
741:
740:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
716:
715:
714:
710:
706:
701:
697:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
674:
673:
672:
668:
664:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
634:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
610:
606:
605:
604:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
577:
572:
567:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
544:
543:
542:
538:
534:
530:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
505:
504:
503:
499:
495:
490:
482:
480:
479:
475:
471:
463:
455:
451:
447:
442:
441:
440:
436:
432:
428:
427:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
374:
373:
372:
368:
364:
360:
355:
348:
346:
344:
340:
336:
332:
325:
321:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
295:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
267:
264:
259:
255:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
232:
225:
221:
217:
213:
208:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
174:
172:
171:
167:
163:
157:
156:
153:
152:
147:
140:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
115:
112:
109:
106:
100:
99:Dear Nigelj,
94:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
72:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2123:ā Preceding
2119:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2105:
2102:
2098:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2076:
2073:
1996:
1993:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1975:
1971:
1965:
1962:
1959:
1917:
1914:Masturbation
1841:
1837:
1831:
1829:
1786:
1743:
1717:
1708:
1691:
1677:
1665:
1654:
1617:
1610:
1571:
1541:
1494:
1454:
1385:
1369:97.87.29.188
1358:
1319:
1292:
1275:
1271:
1264:
1237:
1215:
1175:
1143:Pete Tillman
1138:
1136:
1100:
1057:
1037:comments?
1032:
1009:
966:
943:
940:
919:99.181.140.6
900:Mr. Rubin.
886:Arthur Rubin
867:99.190.85.26
858:
850:
842:
838:
836:
810:
781:
777:
773:
765:
746:Pete Tillman
705:Pete Tillman
702:
698:
695:
678:IanOfNorwich
663:IanOfNorwich
659:
617:
582:āĀ Preceding
568:
566:Dear Nigelj
565:
526:
486:
467:
395:
392:impersonator
353:
352:
326:
322:
319:
272:ā Preceding
268:
265:
263:Dear Nigelj
262:
236:
211:
206:
183:āĀ Preceding
178:
158:
150:
146:User:Pmedema
143:
113:
110:
101:
98:
70:
43:
37:
2129:Ttennebkram
1998:Ttennebkram
1764:example.org
1548:Equilibrium
1281:Bill Huston
1156:No prob. --
896:Please see
880:Please see
788:Phonetagger
574:āPreceding
431:Slightsmile
402:Slightsmile
329:āPreceding
237:Please see
36:This is an
2074:Hi Nigel,
1842:he/him/his
1838:they/their
1576:. Thanks,
1276:electrical
882:WP:CANVASS
696:Hi Nigel:
320:Hi Nigelj
278:Lickandqui
256:Copy from
2114:be done.
2018:WP:BURDEN
1243:Viriditas
1224:Viriditas
1197:this edit
1182:Viriditas
946:this diff
811:article's
656:Main Page
533:Perhelion
494:AdamRoach
299:this edit
114:jdoniach
87:ArchiveĀ 6
82:ArchiveĀ 5
77:ArchiveĀ 4
71:ArchiveĀ 3
65:ArchiveĀ 2
60:ArchiveĀ 1
2137:contribs
2125:unsigned
1898:Yopienso
1846:Yopienso
1789:Internet
1694:Yopienso
1680:Yopienso
1458:Hergilfs
1382:Picker78
1216:admitted
596:contribs
588:Hfmanson
584:unsigned
363:Takimata
331:unsigned
286:contribs
274:unsigned
197:contribs
185:unsigned
2011:Hi Mark
1794:Capouch
1746:WP:SELF
1620:Qwerty0
1578:DPL bot
1542:Hi. In
1272:digital
630:WP:CITE
614:WP:LEDE
576:undated
327:Chris
243:Johnfos
39:archive
2155:Nigelj
2120:Mark
2061:Nigelj
1942:Nigelj
1926:hockey
1862:Nigelj
1814:Nigelj
1769:Nigelj
1723:Nigelj
1660:report
1635:Nigelj
1593:Nigelj
1524:Nigelj
1477:Nigelj
1412:Nigelj
1337:Nigelj
1302:Nigelj
1202:Nigelj
1158:Nigelj
1119:Nigelj
1083:Nigelj
989:Nigelj
898:WP:TPG
889:(talk)
857:) and
819:Nigelj
728:Nigelj
642:Nigelj
548:Nigelj
509:Nigelj
446:Nigelj
417:Nigelj
378:Nigelj
307:Nigelj
216:Nigelj
162:Nigelj
151:mabdul
124:Nigelj
2057:Nigel
2023:WP:RS
1293:forty
1139:Argue
1060:Vulva
1053:Vulva
884:. ā
626:WP:RS
139:tkWWW
16:<
2159:talk
2133:talk
2065:talk
2002:talk
1946:talk
1921:Addi
1902:talk
1866:talk
1850:talk
1818:talk
1798:talk
1773:talk
1727:talk
1698:talk
1684:talk
1672:NASA
1639:talk
1624:talk
1597:talk
1582:talk
1528:talk
1518:and
1505:talk
1481:talk
1462:talk
1451:Otzi
1416:talk
1388:here
1373:talk
1341:talk
1326:talk
1306:talk
1247:talk
1228:talk
1206:talk
1186:talk
1162:talk
1147:talk
1123:talk
1108:talk
1087:talk
1081:. --
1068:talk
1043:talk
1020:talk
1014:.
993:talk
978:talk
969:here
963:Sign
955:talk
941:Hi,
923:talk
906:talk
871:talk
823:talk
817:. --
792:talk
750:talk
732:talk
720:WP:V
709:talk
682:talk
667:talk
646:talk
638:MIME
622:WP:V
618:MIME
592:talk
571:talk
552:talk
537:talk
513:talk
498:talk
474:talk
450:talk
435:talk
421:talk
406:talk
382:talk
367:talk
339:talk
311:talk
282:talk
247:talk
241:...
220:talk
212:only
193:talk
166:talk
128:talk
1751:Luk
1709:And
1666:one
1562:FAQ
1390:. ā
1238:not
865:)
207:not
2161:)
2153:--
2139:)
2135:ā¢
2067:)
2004:)
1948:)
1931:10
1904:)
1868:)
1860:--
1852:)
1820:)
1775:)
1729:)
1700:)
1686:)
1641:)
1626:)
1618:--
1599:)
1584:)
1554:|
1530:)
1507:)
1499:.
1483:)
1464:)
1418:)
1375:)
1343:)
1328:)
1308:)
1249:)
1230:)
1208:)
1188:)
1164:)
1149:)
1125:)
1110:)
1089:)
1070:)
1045:)
1022:)
995:)
953:-
925:)
908:)
873:)
825:)
794:)
786:--
752:)
734:)
711:)
684:)
669:)
661:--
648:)
598:)
594:ā¢
554:)
539:)
515:)
500:)
476:)
452:)
444:--
437:)
423:)
408:)
384:)
369:)
341:)
313:)
288:)
284:ā¢
249:)
222:)
195:ā¢
168:)
160:--
130:)
2157:(
2131:(
2063:(
2000:(
1944:(
1900:(
1864:(
1848:(
1832:n
1830:I
1816:(
1796:(
1771:(
1761:'
1725:(
1696:(
1682:(
1670:(
1637:(
1622:(
1595:(
1580:(
1568:.
1550:(
1526:(
1503:(
1479:(
1460:(
1437:C
1434:Ā·
1414:(
1399:C
1396:Ā·
1371:(
1339:(
1324:(
1304:(
1245:(
1226:(
1204:(
1184:(
1160:(
1145:(
1121:(
1106:(
1085:(
1066:(
1041:(
1018:(
991:(
921:(
904:(
869:(
861:(
853:(
845:(
821:(
790:(
748:(
730:(
707:(
680:(
665:(
644:(
590:(
550:(
535:(
511:(
496:(
472:(
448:(
433:(
419:(
404:(
380:(
365:(
337:(
309:(
280:(
245:(
218:(
191:(
164:(
126:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.