User talk:Nillurcheier

605:

everybody starting with the Catholic Church try to inflate their numbers as much as possible. For a time, the Catholic Church insisted that every Catholic-baptized Spaniard was a Catholic ---meaning almost all of us back then, even if you were a publicly known Atheist. Not baptizing your children in Francoist Spain was a bad idea (they wouldn't shoot you for that after 1945 or so but you should expect trouble for you and especially the kid ---the "fe de bautismo" or baptismal registry was an often required document and not having it meant all kinds of more-or-less subtle but very real troubles.) Even for some time after the dictator died and the laws changed it was seriously frown upon. So almost all of us born before 1980 or so were counted as Catholics. Actually it's still difficult to formally apostatize nowadays in order to "be erased" of their registries ---they just add a handwritten note in your baptismal register saying that you have apostatized with no further consequences, in case you take all the time needed to go through the process.

623:

Nonbelievers are just not baptizing their children anymore. Only in the last years the Spanish Catholic Church has started to admit that they may not be so many "zillions" after all... because you only need to visit Spain staying with average Spaniards for a couple weeks to realize that's totally unreal, not to mention if you're a Spaniard living here. Over 50% of priests should have retired long ago, but the poor old guys are still working because all the Spanish seminaries together aren't able to consecrate 200 new priests a year ---it's not a job that young people want even with our high unemployment and all. We're talking about a country that in past times had over 100,000 priests with much less population ---now they're slightly above 15,000 and shrinking fast out of biological reasons. Even the officially religious ceremonies like baptisms or marriages and the First Communion, or traditional festivities like the Semana Santa and similar, are just socially-recognized parties or kind-of-cathartic experiences for most people.

461:

something like "well... my family used to be Catholic, I was baptized in the Catholic Church, got the First Communion, maybe I was married in a Catholic Church, I sort of believe in 'something' more or less along Christian lines, so I guess I'm Catholic." In reality, a majority of modern Spaniards are basically secular and they don't believe in most tenets of Catholicism, they don't follow their teachings, they behave like us "fully secular" Spaniards and they rarely attend Mass (as you can see in question 56a), often just to go with the family to baptisms, first communions, marriages and funerals and that's all. There's even a joke about kids "taking their First and Last Communion," meaning people do it for the family party and the presents and such things, not out of religious faith, and they won't attend Mass again.

704:, when in Government, does nothing about abortion or any other liberal laws introduced when the left is governing, and sometimes they even take them further to show how modern and socially-conscious they are. This "religious right" is currently not represented in any Spanish party with a seat in Parliament (or even the possibility to get one), and hasn't been for around 2 decades. Even highly conservative, admittedly rightist and Catholic people who attend Mass every Sunday vote Popular Party ---which barely touches a comma of the progressive social laws introduced by the left and even approve new ones (like the post-coital pill, or extensions of divorce rights) because that's what "we the people" seem to want, no matter what some people say. 713:

sector... they had possibilities. For a while, it sounded like they could do something with the most rightist and Conservative disenchanted Popular Party's voters. Well, their best result was 250,000 votes (1.57%) in the 2014 European Election, far, far away from a seat in the European Parliament. More recently, they're getting 50,000-60,000 votes in the latest general elections, far less than the single-issue anti-bullfighting, animal-rights party PACMA (and no seats anywhere, of course.) There are 4-5 times more Spaniards voting to ban bullfighting than voting to ban abortion. Who could have thought that 30 years ago...?

650:

were quite a few instances of enlightened liberalism and even violent anti-clericalism in the History of Spain), and when that yoke was gone, we as a society went ahead full-steam. Going from being "the spiritual reserve of the West" to becoming the third country in the world fully legalizing gay marriage with barely a protest, a median age for first (obviously unmarried) sex at 15 y.o. (13 or 14 not being unusual at all) with pretty much the acceptance of your family, and generally being a bunch of irreligious or softly-religious "hardcore social liberals" is quite a change, huh...?

451:. Unfortunately they don't break down minoritary religions and all of them are included in the "others" category, but if you check question 56 in page 30, you'll see that the entire "others" category (including Protestantism but also Islam, New-Age movements, etc) sums up only 2.2% of the population. This is coherent with the general trends of all previous C.I.S. studies and studies from private agencies (like Pew and Gallup) that I've seen too. So I'd say that a number around 2-2.5% for all the "others" together is quite realistic. 645:) and if you asked me, I wouldn't be able to name any of their school mates, friends and acquaintances in their age range who could be (more or less) described as a "true Catholic." Some of them still attend Mass with their families on Sundays, but it's pretty obvious most of them will stop doing it as soon as they get a bit older. I guess that, as an irreligious person, I could say I'm perfectly OK with what for me is a "triumph of reason", but I'll also admit that as I told you before, the change has been 485:, but I wouldn't say they're a majority. As an example, not far from where I live there is a Gypsy-majority neighborhood with over 7,000 residents, I've seen their church, and it's a really little place where you and I'd be pressed hard to pack 100 people inside. Most of those I know are as secularized as us non-Gypsy Spaniards. Jehova's Witnesses (are they Protestants...?) experienced a boost after the end of Francoism, but they've been pretty much stagnated in the last decades and they're 402:. I'm a Spaniard living in Spain and I don't have anything against Protestants (pretty much agnostic, myself) but trust me, there's absolutely no way over 2.5% of the population is Protestant even accounting for immigration and the Jehova's Witnesses (if they're protestants...) Protestant sites tend to inflate the numbers by obvious reasons but it's simply not realistic. That's why I've added a "better source needed" tag (as in an independent source...) Best regards, -- 680:

Catholic Church to show who is more "sociologically relevant" to make the politicians think about them... but the most "sociologically relevant religion" in Spain is a "silent majority" of vague "believers-in-something-or-nothing-at-all" who just live our lives without caring about those fights at all. Are you going to baptize your new baby? Cool, invite me to the party! Aren't you? Cool, let's throw that party to welcome the little one anyway!

1769:, first I prefer a more polite style of conversation, we are not debating the most important conflict of the world and are not in an edit war. Be so kind and link the appropriate Knowledge guideline that has a rule for this issue. Be also so kind and explain, why many last names in English Knowledge are spelled according to German rules (Göring, Schröder etc.). Next, please explain why there are dozens of "Straße" in the English Knowledge like 439:¡Hola, Ulrich! :) Unfortunately I can't, and I have tried hard to in the past because I'm quite interested in the history and sociology of religion. Here in Spain, there is no obligation or motivation to declare your religion in any official document or anything like that (actually it isn't asked anywhere), so we don't have "official data." However, the best available info about the religious composition of Spanish society is provided by the 4339: 3924: 3533: 3287: 490:

Protestants", but I still don't see it. Nowadays there isn't religious persecution in Spain at all (well, maybe except for Racists against Muslims...) and if 2.5% of the general population including immigrants were Protestants, I think they would be far more visible than they are. They're practically "invisible." If I'm able to find better info, I'll sure add it to the article and tell you here. :)

943: 3708: 2643: 3472:) 17:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC) I understand that you do not like the data but some people agree that it helps and there is no definite way to please both party's and I'm not allowed to pick sides so unless you come up with some evidence that the charts are useless they have to remain there. thanks for calmly explaining your side of the story. hope that this issue gets resolved. 3433: 3242: 2994: 162: 4130: 4571:. This is the legal term used to describe them. Unlike places like California, they are countries, not states or subdivisions of a larger country. Yes, not sovereign countries, but still countries in their own right. “Countries within a country” is the term commonly used to describe their status. Thought I would clear that up for you. Thanks. 3048:, yes i know this is against the general policy for talk pages. However I gave a clear and more than valid reason to deviate here from common policy. It is not a "legitimate comment" to use humiliating Nazi terms for people who suffered death by Nazi murderers. Thence my edit was explained, reasonable and should be acceptable by everybody. 3464:, thanks for asking. I am absolutely neutral regarding religious data. What I dislike is pseudodata, ie estimations for and projections into the far future. They are crystal balls and lack any reliability. Quite often they are made by POV-people who want to push their religions perspective. Looking curiously forward to your stance. BR 537:, thanks for your long and detailed explanation. I follow the CIS data series and rate it the best available source. In addition, there is the PEW, which reports 1% Protestants and 2% Orthodox Christians. As you already supposed, the major difficulty might be the immigrants, who are not fully represented in the CIS-surveys. The page 3111:, I don't worry much about your revert. However, the article's name is "Glossary of Nazi Germany". Hence entries should be restricted to words, which had a specific meaning in the 3rd Reich. U-Boot has been used before and after these 12 years and Nazis did not add a special connotation. Kurz gesagt, kein Nazi-Jargon. Best Ulrich -- 3155:) rather than the loaded and redundant term 'Hitlerism', with a slightly clearer form. I am not remotely interested in false claims about some alleged political agenda. However, further claims that I have intended anything 'sneaky' will be reported as a personal attack. (I have also once again removed excessive citations per 587:

the non-FEREDE churches. But as said, their numbers are notoriously suspicious and they don't provide any public source to support them. And I tend to think that those little and scarce non-FEREDE churches (it's difficult to find one) can't possibly sum up 800,000 Protestants plus their self-reported 400,000.

3088:

Grüß Gott Ulrich -- So I reverted your deletion of U-Boot, under the auspices of its routine appearance in WW2 literature and the fact that many novice readers rarely engage with WW1 content by comparison. Falls Sie stimmen noch nicht zu, können wir weiter diskutieren....besser hier als dort weil die

2046:

ok, now I understand your comment. Well, "try to move the party further towards right positions" does not mean, it is now "far right". And for sure that does not qualify for the info box. What I ment was, you could add a paragraph that several sources share the opinion that the party is moving to the

1078:

was reverted, under the justification that there is "no connection." I am writing to explain my reasoning for providing the link. A significant portion of the Environmental racism in Europe article is devoted to specific environmental policies and laws within the European union, and the often-complex

333:

quite often outdated. E.g. the religious composition for Germany in the Factbook says 34% Catholic and 34% protestants. Well this is a figure that was true in 1995. today it's 29% and 28%. I hope, we can agree on the preference or primary sources such as censuses or surveys (e.g. by PEW). BR Ulrich --

998:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

2726:

Hi. Peter was indeed a Jew, but it's inaccurate to say he was a "converet" in any way. Obviously he did not convert to Judaism. And it would be an anachronism to claim he converted to Christianity, since Judaism and Christianity hadn't yet split into two different religions. I don't think you could

1912:

On the irreligion in finland page you undid an edit by ip93.106.184.30, however that was undone by user Kornagad - a for years dormant user until recently. You warned user Kornagad related to edits on the catholic church in finland page. Fyi. This once dormant user has been active in recent days on

1828:

On 1st Feb you deleted two recent inserts to the History section to the Dowsing page with the description "not helpful". Can you say how you reached this conclusion? Both inserts were completely referenced and both were previously missing from that section. One documented the first water dowse, the

1319:

Hello there Nillurcheier! I saw your edit on the Fowid chart and wanted to discuss. I think that two sources on the same pie chart is confusing. Also, the data from Fowid itself is also based on Remid so this makes it even more confusing. A better way to have many sources would be to use tables the

622:

Rarely anyone formally apostatize because it's too much time and effort for such a little "victory", so the Catholic Church can still say they're "zillions" (after all, the C.I.S., even being a Government entity, just does sociological studies; as I told you, there's no "official religion record.")

586:

doesn't provide a breakdown either, and there are super-tiny groups which are not members of FEREDE. FEREDE says they serve around 400,000 Spanish protestants (150,000 of them Gypsies), not specifying if native or naturalized, and that "there must be" around 1,200,000 Protestants in Spain including

3026:

To be honest, I don't care that much. However, it would be nice if you acknowledged that your edit is against policy, rather than just doing it by stealth. Maybe you could edit it but leave a note explaining what you have done and why. You do need to acknowledge policy rather than just edit as you

1459:

revealed in another article based on recently revealed documents, that Brandt, after the outbreak of the Yom Kippur War, by not allowing United States Air Force transport planes, rushing in the urgently needed military supplies for Israel, to fly over Germany or to land at U.S. airbases in Germany

544:

Looking at the list, I see (thousands): 750 Rumanos, 142 Bulgaros, 91 Ucranianos, 68 Russians which might sum up to 1.1 mio from eastern Europe, being 80-90% Orthodox, which explains the 2% pretty well. There are also 283 Britanicos (50%prot),131 Alemanes (30%prot), 73 Brasil (25%prot), 43 Nigeria

470:

strong in Spain in recent decades, shockingly fast for such a deep phenomenon, transforming this old "bulkwark of Catholicism" into just another highly secularized modern Western European country. So I'd say the number of "real" Catholics is very inflated too because of these "I guess I'm Catholic

332:

thanks for your question. In general CIA World Factbook is an acceptable source. However they don't do original research but collect carefully data from all over the world. Hence, if we have and know primary sources, they should always be preferred. Some data is on date, religious data however are

2452:

under the notation that this was not discussed in the talk page. Please note that this __was__ discussed, as I said in the edit description. Since the content is very malignant and hurts the subject, I have reversed your change. Please write back on the talk page mentioned originally why you feel

649:

shockingly fast and deep that it's somehow scary ---don't ask me why, I guess I should be happy because "my team is winning big time", but I find something uncanny in such a transformation of an entire society, so quick. Possibly the Francoism keep a much older trend artificially repressed (there

2226:

Hi Ulrich - on the Bangladesh page talk I suggested several weeks ago an update of the total fertility rate in the Demographic section. The published figures are outdated and should be replaced by 2016 World Bank data. This is important because Bangladesh has now reduced its TFR to replacement

712:

and this one was not just a fringe far-right thing: they got some decent financing and they had a couple Catholic leaders behind (including a bishop), some backing from the "alt-right" (and far-right...), their leading candidate was a former well-known leader of the Popular Party's most rightist

460:

There are 2 important caveats to consider here. First, the C.I.S. only asks Spaniards (native or naturalized), so non-naturalized residents are not included in their studies. Second, the number of Catholics (67.8%) are mostly "self-identified Catholics", "identity Catholics" or the like, meaning

604:

I would say that "all religions lie" here, because there are perks for the "biggest religions", like easier access to subsidies for their activities and chartered schools, salaries for (your) religion teachers in public schools and things like that. In general terms, "the larger the better", so

1668:

is even more emblematic of their unreliability; the recent change replaced Eurobarometer 2012 data which shew Lutherans at 64% with more recent data which show Lutherans at 79%, a drastic change that is not worthy of representation since it is just a pointer to an equally drastic difference in

1287:

The long term discussions as evidenced in the talk page archives that I have been a part of for 12 years was that a section dedicated to conspiracy theories was not to be added to the 9/11 attacks article. Maybe you need to get more familiar with what those discussion were so you know what the

4509:

or gave birth to other children. If you would like to add the information to the article that you've been attempting to add (but keeps getting reverted), you need to do so by adding referenced material to the body of the article with reliable sources. Let me know if you need help doing so. --

1079:

relationship between environmental policies and how certain groups of people experience environmental issues in Europe. I would like to respectfully ask you to please re-review the article I have linked to, and to please re-consider what I feel was a constructive, specific, and relevant edit.

679:

Protestant. The Muslims also play the game. I personally know not a few people from Muslim countries who don't step into a mosque and who love Spanish wine and ham as much as me, and they've told me that the Islamic Community regards them as Muslims. It's like a race among all of them and the

465:

the number of civil (non-religious) marriages overpassed the number of religious marriages, following a 20-year-old trend, and they are on the rise (not to mention the huge number of couples just living together.) Quite a few people are no longer baptizing their children either, not even as a

1854:

thanks for this hint. I tried to revert the last edit (changing the word dowsing), but Nottnott was faster so I got confused. However I do not clearly understand, why some cited and reasonable formulated paragraphs were deleted. I reverted my deletion and am looking forward to a constructive

489:

according to their own recent data. And... that's pretty much all among native and naturalized Spaniards. Protestants, Muslims and other "others" are mostly non-naturalized immigrants/residents. I guess it could be said "OK, maybe including all those people they sum up a bit above 1 million

563:

too, but still I wouldn't expect a huge increase of the number. Around 1% Protestants in the total population sounds like a quite reasonable number to me too, quite dispersed in small churches (usually divided by country of origin) which are only present in cities or (very) large

3629:), and I fully agree with you as they are pseudodata projections based on their 2010 estimates (based on small sample surveys and now outdated for 12 years), and as such they are being contradicted by more recent accurate surveys and official censuses. They are also against the 779:

Not really . In an informal conversation you may use these terms, but officially the FRG persists as a nation since 1949 whereas the GDR ceased to exist in 1990 when their states (Länder) decided to join the FRG (according to the rules described in the Grundgesetz). BR Ulrich

1404:

asked the German Social Democrat Willy Brandt for advice and action during his visit to Israel in June 1973. It should have helped to set the peace process in motion. But Willy Brandt, the argument says, dismally failed to help. For Brandt, Israel was a disturbing factor.

875:

from wreacking havoc in articles about religion demographics by changing recent reliable data with Pew-Templeton's and other Christian agencies's data to inflate the number of Christians. Recently, many people have raised concerns about the reliability of data contained in

2579:: "After an initial mention, a person should generally be referred to by surname only... this includes academic or professional prefixes like "Dr."". In other words, the initial mention of a subject should include "Dr.", and then surname only. As my mention of Höppner in 640:

I'm not saying that there are zero "true Catholics" in Spain nowadays, sure there are quite a few, but as I told you I doubt they're even 25%, much less among the younger generations. I have 2 daughters (a young teenager and an almost-teenager... terrifying, yesss!!!

471:

but..." answers. This is especially true among the younger generations, at least those who don't directly declare themselves irreligious or Atheists. Analyzing the C.I.S. studies, I'd say that around 25% of Spaniards or even less are "sort-of-true" Catholics nowadays.

581:

I wouldn't even dare to talk about prevailing denominations; I don't think there's enough "critical mass" for that. Possibly Pentecostal/Evangelical denominations and that Gypsy Church are more extended, but "prevailing" would be too much of a word in my opinion.

1892:

I left the message below on the talk page of JimRenge. Related to this. You undid a change by user Korangad who undid a change by user JimRenge who corrected a change by IP93.106.184.30. See recent history on Islam by country. So thanks for making WIKI better.

2601:. There you can read the sentence: "Academic and professional titles (such as "Dr." or "Professor"), including honorary ones, should be used in a Knowledge article only when the subject is widely known by a pseudonym or stage name containing such a title". -- 671:? OK, count 607,500 Orthodox Christians more! (Even if the only church that the 607,500th visited in the last decade was the Cathedral of Burgos, just out of historical interest.) Pretty much the same with Protestants: it feels like they are counting every 1913:

wiki pages : religion in finland, irreligion in finland, indians in finland, islam in finland, catholic church in Finland. On the same pages IP93.106.184.30 was active, so the edit warring might be more elaborate than it appears at first glance. Regards

3190:

I am not involved in any JW issues. However there are permanent ugly attempts to call the NSDAP far-left (e.g. socialist only) instead of far-right. I assumed, your change was part of these attacks. If not, the issue seems to be settled for me.

1157:

twice, and both times you have reverted my changes, deeming them vandalism. However, all I was doing was fixing a few grammatical errors (a comma splice and the incorrect capitalization of "Within"). Why do you feel these edits are improper?

2075:

Whatever we write must be sourced by reliable sources. All current sources say they are trying to harvest voters at the far right wing and raise the question how far would they go for that. Sources saying "CSU IS far right" are lacking.

1740:

Unless you want to brought up on the noticeboards for admninistrator sanctioning, I would suggest that you do not replace English-langauge spelling with German-language spelling again. This is English-language Knowledge, and the "ß" is

1387:

according to this analysis, based on hitherto unpublished and now released documents in the United States, Germany and Israel, in the summer of 1973 wanted peace with Egypt and hand back virtually all of the territories conquered on the

4664:. An anon IP changed the 3rd most populous to some odd 16th most populous. I had no idea whether it was vandalism or not but the sentence was correct prior to their edit. I fixed it and you reverted me? I assume a mistake on your part? 4046:

apologies for the delay , I was wondering if I could pay you something around 100€ to scan those books and make them pdf and send them to me since i havent been able to find many of them, I'll pay you first if there's any trust issues

2472:

Hello. you must check the stats again. hinduism and chinese religions at the "pie chart" and the "paragraph" is upside-down! you have to look at it again and change it. i already changed the right thing but it has been removed

1869:

Thanks, I get confused by wikipedia still. I successfully reverted your last edit. Maybe best to look through to see what's there now if you still want to change it, but I think there was some vandalism that Nottnott fixed/

480:

As for Protestants: native non-Gypsy Spanish Protestants are exceedingly rare ---I think I've met 4 or 5 in my entire life. A number of Gypsies (who have been perfectly Spanish for centuries) are followers of the so-called

1684:

So you should remove poor-sourced surveys like the Ipsos Global Trends one? A difference in the phrasing of the question can change the the results. Please explain why do you think that these sources are unrealiable. Both

4315:

Exactly and not something like "what then was West Germany". It always was the FRG, just the common name in the US (and elsewhere) changed after the reunification, which was de jure an accession of hte former GDR-Länder.

3849:

geschrieben. Der Begriff "drittes Reich" fand erst in Nazi Propaganda weite Verbreitung (ein historiografischer Versuch deren Diktatur als Nachfolgerstaat zu legitimieren) und ich stufe ihn daher als historisch belastet

4566:

I just wanted to clarify that it’s not the case that “the Scot’s use the term country differently from the rest of the world”. Scotland, along with England, Wales and, even controversial, Northern Ireland, are indeed

2574:

Okay, those two policies you've linked to specifically deal with things like "Her Majesty" and "His Holiness". Doesn't mention "Dr." once. However, I appreciate you linking to that page, because on the same page is

1440:

correctly warned Brandt in summer 1973: “It is five minutes before twelve. The Arabs are preparing for a total war ... They are ready to destroy Israel, and they have the means to do so" Tito told the Chancellor.

3771: 3256:, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the 3004:, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the 2838:, I'm confused as to the reversion of my edits, could you please elaborate? If one source is more recent than the other, are ranges supposed to be provided even if said sources are older? An example would be the 4384: 3969: 3576: 3330: 2249:

Moreover less than 1000 Chinese people live there. They cannot be considered part of the population. Most are expats. The Chinese that lived there shifted to India, mostly to Kolkata and other major cities.

4368:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3953:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3560:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3314:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2253:

We could have taken the people originating from India as ethnically Indian if their origin was ambiguous. But it isn't. Most came from the neighbouring West Bengal, Tripura, Assam; states of India.

1105:, sorry for that, I did not intent to revert your edit. it was a kind of collateral demage of the other reverts. Regarding your "Environmental racism" activities I have neutral position. BR Ulrich -- 4593: 1514:

but I think that the article needs also survey data. Other countries' article that have religious institution data as first source, like the Sweden's one, are implemented with additional surveys.--

3803:

If you will need to cite it, hereinabove is the outcome of the RSN discussion + deprecation RfC about Gordon-Conwell's WRD/WCD/WCE+ARDA & Pew-Templeton's GRF, closed by Firefangledfeathers.--

3248:. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at 2327:

There is no "Muenchner Rundschau". Maybe, you are refering to the "Rundschau" the daily news channel of Bavarian TV. Anyhow, it's up to you to provide and add the source for your claim, not me.--

3000:. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered 2144:

The placebo effect is not a thing. There is no convincing evidence that it is anything other than a collection of biases and confounders (e.g. regression to the mean, recall bias and so on).

2107: 1664:

about the unreliability of those small surveys. If we keep adding such kind of survey data the articles will soon turn into unreadable lists of decontextualised useless data. The case of

3495:

as a clear and strong support of my claim. It says: "Knowledge does not predict the future." Sure, there are exceptions, but speculations about adherents in 2050 are extremely daubtful.

1669:

methodology between the two poor-quality small surveys. In my opinion, we should establish a policy to prevent that any of those poor-quality data are inserted into Knowledge articles.--

880:", in the talk page, but Jobas has removed the tag again. It has become impossible to make new edits to articles about religion demographics as he appears to patrol daily most of them.-- 4090:

because of a page clearly cited in the article that states he is. If you believe it is an "unsourced fake," then please rectify this from the article instead of reverting my changes.

583: 4353: 3938: 3671:

Thanks and 100% support from my side. This data is unreliable and outdated. If we made it to add GRF to this list, it would be a great improvement for the data qulaity in this field.

3546: 3300: 2396:

since you deleted many sources, I had to revert to the last verison containing these sources. You may start to readd other sources, but don`t delete well sourced data in the list. --

1408:

Firstly, because he had no great interest in close contacts with Israel. This corresponded (and corresponds in the opinion of the authors until today) to the majority opinion of the

667:

Protestants and the Orthodox tend to do something very much like the Catholic Church: counting every "theoretical" follower as one of them. Do we have 750,000 Romanians in Spain and

3845:

angeschaut hast. Ich bin der Meinung, dass die Begriffe "Nazi Germany" und "Third Reich" nicht miteinander gleichzusetzen sind. Ich habe zu diesem Thema ein paar Absätze auf meiner

1694: 1261:

Sorry for having been rude in my wording, however there was a reoccuring change of the word "god" without any explanation. I am glad that the issue has been solved, BR Ulrich --

559:

You're very welcome, Ulrich. :) As you can see, this is certainly an interest of me! :) I guess we could add the corresponding percentages of other Latin American immigrants in

313:

is not poor source. B) It is very on date indeed. If you want to argue with the sourch coming from World Factbook I perphere also argue about other sourches indeed. Thanks, --

3763: 3257: 3245: 3005: 2997: 1220:

Oh dear! It seems a chrome extension of mine has led to more changes in the article than I intended. I'm very sorry about this, and I apologize for any misunderstandings.

1380:

The authors say that Egypt and Syria, almost exactly forty years ago, had almost extinguished Israel's existence by their surprise attack on the highest Jewish holiday.

4597: 914: 425:, I agree with you that the numbers seem to be quite high. Could you provide more realistic data with a reliable source? ?que dice la pagina espa~nola? saludos Ulrich -- 1448:, the Chancellor made a crass mistake: he depreciated Jerusalem's unalloyed initiative, leaving it to the routine of professional diplomats. More importantly, unlike 545:(35%prot), summing up to approx. 220.000 foreign protestants. Adding another 200.000 (?) "native" Spanish Protestants, 1% is a rather plausible result. BR Ulrich -- 1805:, on the order of "There is a discussion at XXXX which you may be interested in..." By laying out your opinion about the discussion in the pointer you placed at 3876: 3444:. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 2654:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to 700:

The smarter politicians noticed it long ago and the not-so-smart ones are getting it too: our (small) "religious right" has been fuming for years because the

1829:

other presented scholarship about the source of the term "dowsing", where previously the page said "unknown origin". Would you consider undoing this change?

1693:

are very reliable sources coming from excellent research centers, the results have been perfectly weighted. The results of both of them are published in the

1342:

You are weclome to shorten the contribition. Here it is in Wiki Format. The matter is a serious one indeed, and it deserves a mention in the Brandt article

447:, which elaborates monthly statistics about a number of issues through (voluntary) polls, including religion, since 1979. Last published one was done on 4161:" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( 3067: 3032: 3013: 2090:

But, there are sources detailing how their leader loved that his age number of people were deported, what makes them far-right then, actual genocide?

1041: 444: 2352: 4031:

obviously, they are in German only. In addition, I have a personal collection inherited from my grandfather, who was a personal friend of Niekisch.

1958: 823:, seriously? Could we agree on a formulation like "Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany)"? Otherwise we have to stick to the official names -- 708:

party promising a return to more conservative values has miserably failed since the first democratic elections in 1977. The last one trying it was

4445: 3125:

Fair enough, I reverted myself. Ich werde mich nicht überrascht sein, wenn andere Wiki-editors "U-Boot" wieder zum Artikel anfügen. Mal sehen. --

957:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 4025: 2196: 1697:'s website, largest German infrastructure institute for the social sciences and one of the most important social science institutes of Europe.-- 2948: 2697: 1606: 1595: 1584: 1573: 1562: 1551: 1540: 3159:.) If you wish to discuss the merits of the edit (without alleging nonsense about 'sneaky changes') please do so at the article's Talk page.-- 466:

social/family thing. Civil "coming of age parties" instead of First Communions, if still minoritary, are on the rise. Secularization has been

2534:

Could you kindly point out the policy where it states "Dr." is not to be used in front of a doctor's name? I searched and could not find it.

1690: 1037: 966: 138: 131: 1628: 1617: 173:

without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge with an accurate

4407: 3992: 3599: 3352: 3063: 3028: 3009: 2688:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

919: 910: 353:

Claiming sourced statements are "wrong claims" just isn't enough. I've reinstated the statements which are backed up by a reliable source (

57: 2170:

why did you take out palestine completely and keep the rest of the edits? that is wholly inappropriate to just keep out one other state?

1933: 3398: 2615:

just read the section that I just pointed out to you, which says that "Dr." can be used in the initial mention, and omitted thereafter.

2091: 2062: 2033: 2004: 277:, I double-checked and sourced all my changes carefully. All of them are well sourced. If you know other data, feel free to add them. -- 2195:. The edit you undid is part of a long-term pattern of vandalism, inserting false data into a variety of article. There is a thread at 309:. I dont't agree with you that your argument about undoing the eding is purley just "poor, outdated and indirect source". Because A) 4158: 1720: 22: 2944: 2111: 3879:

and explain why you consider the long names of the party to be "core information" to the article about the ideology? Thank you. —

2227:

level - a significant demographic event. I have seen no response to this request. How can I get this done? Thanks. Ed Fendley

4439: 4010: 1962: 1452:, he had included the great powers. Peace Chancellor Brandt did not prevent the Middle East war in 1973. He could have done it. 1444:

Summing up their assessment, the analysis comes to the conclusion that beyond the question of guilt for not having prevented the

881: 3645:. I think that at this point it would be a good idea to ask the addition of the Global Religious Futures project to the list of 2505: 4568: 4403: 3988: 3686: 3595: 3441: 3348: 448: 4515: 3253: 3001: 2246:

India and China are countries with more than 1 billion people. Those countries cannot be considered as ethnically singular.

1075: 1034:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 958: 177:. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the 3822:

Hello By referring to World meter, you can see the population of Asian countries. The statistics I wrote were correct😐😐😐

3877:

Talk:Nazism § "National Socialist German Workers' Party" as an article title term and inclusion of the party name in German

2792:? Back on 9 June, an editor posted a complete copy of the article onto the talk page. I don't think it is useful there. -- 4154: 1472:

regime, saved the State of Israel in its finest hour, by granting the United States airlift of supplies to Israel via the

1136: 1087: 709: 47: 251: 4377: 3962: 3907: 3646: 3569: 3323: 2693: 2659: 974: 52: 4506: 4389: 3974: 3581: 3335: 1175: 978: 3440:. Knowledge is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a 3764:

Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 395#Association of Religion Data Archives and World Religion Database

2032:

You just claimed that the ref doesn't say they are far-right, yet you produced two refs here that seem to say that.

4220: 2493: 2424:

Very simple: add quality sources, don't delete already existing ones unless you have a strong argument to do so. --

1433:, had, since 1966, reoriented his party from the right to the left, but maintained its Israeli-critical attitude. 1366: 482: 26: 4061:

Dear Arsenius, it is not a matter of trust, rather a matter of time. Did you already search at booklooker or zvab

1997:

Instead of continually deleting my comments can you answer? Why does it seem like you got the ref yourself here?

462: 258:(not the percentages) you made. If I looked wrong myself, then please let me know as well, of course. :-) Bests - 4511: 4305: 3752: 3726: 3658: 2797: 2759: 2703: 1497: 986: 486: 2880:

but it provides no references, date, etc. So how would 30% be better and more accurate than 24.4% or 18%. Also,

2501: 1980:

I truly feel that we should have it as a headline. By the way do you know how to make a world map on Knowledge.

1959:

http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/asylstreit-csu-will-die-union-weiter-nach-rechts-ruecken-15653313.html

1774: 1718:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Islam_by_country&type=revision&diff=817841331&oldid=817839954

230:

last week. Since you reverted it, what does "are all actually probably" mean? It doesn't make any sense to me. -

4463: 4200:

Sorry that was my mistake, I misread the sentence and was mislead by the article title. Thanks for the revert.

4186: 3148: 3082: 2868:

I'd also like to mention some numbers in the article are outright wrong on all sources. Cameroon on the WFB is

2310: 1747:

a feature of the English language. If you want to use that, I would suggest you go and edit German Knowledge.

1477: 1242: 1201: 1132: 1100: 1083: 198: 182: 95: 80: 1777:

and many more. Finally let's continue this discussion on the article's talk page. I will copy it. BR Ulrich --

1354: 4026:

https://www.zvab.com/servlet/SearchResults?kn=Ernst%20niekisch&sts=t&cm_sp=SearchF-_-topnav-_-Results

2095: 2066: 2037: 2008: 1026:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

701: 560: 4669: 4142: 3903: 3509:

I understand but you cant delete all the data as you did before. just delete the ones that are outstanding.

3445: 2290: 2260: 1814: 1752: 1724: 1607: