191:
450:
251:
cultures, people who have no knowledge or understanding of that particular region, am I wrong? And that was on the Talk Page, which did not affect the contents of the main article. If I came to be seen as "rude" then I will try to sound less rude. I have also reflected on my actions for this, I consider myself more empathetic now and to be as neutral as possible in explaining perspectives.
261:. I made this account to revert disingenuous edits. As you can see, this account hasn't been used much, and it is because I am still inexperienced and content to see these edits being corrected by more capable editors, which was why I have held off from editing and have reflected upon my actions to not make those types of edit summaries with passive aggressiveness tones.
135:
256:
Was when I was fed up with content on
Knowledge with mass articles relavant to Asian history and studies that was biased and with clear intentions that have political agendas associated with pro-China tones, as if China was superior to all, the edit history of those affected articles were a mess, and
250:
was that every South East Asian country and culture is different. The
Balkans are in Europe, do I say that all of them are Catholic? The grouping of all of these countries together is a long and aged misunderstanding typically from people who have no knowledge of said countries and their respective
398:
to push my POV? I changed the transliteration to accommodate with WP's own usage. Seeing as others on your talk page have accused you of ethnic slurs and insults, it's quite ironic. What's more ironic is that you're accusing me of not understanding
English, yet your own contributions are full of
294:
is because the source given mentioned 600,000 VIETNAMESE troops prepared for a possible invasion by China, not 600,000 Chinese troops that actually fought in the war. The source also did not mention any tanks, so whoever originally added that citation, much like you, did not read the source.
414:
Accusing? It was a fact. You said countless articles when I had never said that. So I questioned your ability of
English reading. And yes, score more points for yourself, I am sure.you want.to let others know of your higher standards of
257:
it took months to a year for an admin to correct and protect it. You should have kept these in check. Every article that has any relevancy with China has been affected. I apologize if I use the term "Chinese shill" or "Wumao"
150:, so it may have been removed. Knowledge is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
495:
479:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
375:
when the source listed DID show it. This proves you are too hot headed and impatient and you resorted to insults and mockery. You also would latet delete the source after realizing your mistake in
290:
that the source cited did not mention the material you removed when it said it nearly verbatim? Also to clarify once more, the reason why I removed the "Vietnamese figure for
Chinese troops" in
423:
for consensus on the transliteration system used in article. I hope you explain your POV and why the article should have a different transliteration system than all the other related articles.
464:
26:
371:
Why did you edit yourself so many times? You kept on making errors and my post wasn't able to go through. First of all, you accused me of revising history in
25:
170:
Hsrd to argue with someone who is very wrong. Even your assessment on the map of the east asia cultural sphere was wrong and was corrected by CMD.
43:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from experienced editors like
518:
336:
You claim that countless articles have used the transliteration system you are proposing, but I cannot find these articles. For example,
379:
376:
372:
143:
514:
488:
195:
500:
438:
Yes, instead of clogging my talk page up from your impatient rants, let's take it to the talk page of the article.
317:
307:
262:
203:
171:
115:
73:
247:
199:
420:
399:
countless errors. It's ok to not be good at
English, it's another to insult another person for their own.
341:
476:
428:
404:
361:
296:
98:
280:
147:
57:
40:
458:
226:
218:
151:
114:
haha thanks girl. I can't believe no one has made this username, especially on wikipedia lol
507:
472:
487:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
424:
400:
357:
50:
316:
You are right, it is my mistake. I should have read it more clearly. Apologies for that.
386:
And now you are accusing me of creating articles just to push my POV? Did I also create
484:
522:
432:
408:
365:
325:
310:
270:
230:
190:
179:
165:
123:
109:
480:
353:
198:. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at
241:
222:
156:
139:
449:
395:
387:
345:
337:
491:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
134:
468:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
217:
is also unacceptable. Furthermore, your user name suggests that you at
213:. Do not cast slurs on the ethnicity of other editors, whatever it is.
356:, use a different transliteration system from the one you changed to.
391:
349:
206:. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Knowledge.
504:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
494:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
462:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
258:
68:
246:
I did not cast slurs on ethnicity. All I said and implied in
221:. If that is the case, then you will end up being blocked.
45:
475:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
291:
287:
254:
214:
210:
17:
Norewritingofhistory, you are invited to the
Teahouse!
93:
Hi there! I was just dropping in to tell you that I
142:. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
352:, all central subjects related to the article
8:
37:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge.
286:You mind explaining why you claimed in
7:
459:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
219:not here to contribute constructivly
443:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
332:What articles are you referring to?
14:
419:A discussion has been started on
448:
380:Special:PermanentLink/1065330107
377:Special:PermanentLink/1065334965
373:Special:PermanentLink/1065327939
189:
144:Talk:Mongol invasions of Vietnam
133:
24:
498:and submit your choices on the
271:17:55, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
231:07:35, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
1:
523:01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
477:Knowledge arbitration process
433:01:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
409:01:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
366:01:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
55:
326:01:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
311:23:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
541:
515:MediaWiki message delivery
79:16:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
63:We hope to see you there!
22:
512:to your user talk page.
321:
266:
180:19:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
175:
166:19:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
124:17:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
119:
110:17:54, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
248:Talk:Kingdom of Vietnam
200:Talk:Kingdom of Vietnam
342:Nong Zhigao rebellions
211:This is not acceptable
146:that didn't seem very
473:Arbitration Committee
456:Hello! Voting in the
318:Norewritingofhistory
263:Norewritingofhistory
204:blocked from editing
172:Norewritingofhistory
116:Norewritingofhistory
35:Norewritingofhistory
281:Sino-Vietnamese War
489:arbitration policy
421:Talk:Song–Viet war
288:this edit you made
196:disruptive editing
58:Visit the Teahouse
525:
194:Please stop your
161:
89:Love the username
86:
85:
80:
76:
72:on behalf of the
532:
513:
511:
452:
305:
302:
299:
279:Recent edits to
245:
193:
164:
159:
154:. Thank you. —
137:
107:
78:
71:
65:
60:
48:
39:Be our guest at
28:
21:
20:
540:
539:
535:
534:
533:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
505:
453:
445:
334:
303:
300:
297:
284:
239:
187:
162:
155:
131:
99:
97:your username.
91:
82:
81:
67:
61:
56:
44:
19:
12:
11:
5:
538:
536:
496:the candidates
465:eligible users
454:
447:
446:
444:
441:
440:
439:
417:
416:
384:
383:
333:
330:
329:
328:
283:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
252:
234:
233:
186:
183:
158:
130:
127:
90:
87:
84:
83:
74:Teahouse hosts
62:
38:
31:
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
537:
526:
524:
520:
516:
509:
503:
502:
497:
492:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
469:
467:
466:
461:
460:
451:
442:
437:
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
422:
413:
412:
411:
410:
406:
402:
397:
393:
389:
381:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:Song-Viet War
351:
347:
343:
339:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
314:
313:
312:
309:
306:
293:
289:
282:
278:
272:
268:
264:
260:
259:50 Cent Party
255:
253:
249:
243:
238:
237:
236:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
208:
207:
205:
202:, you may be
201:
197:
192:
184:
182:
181:
177:
173:
168:
167:
163:
153:
149:
145:
141:
136:
128:
126:
125:
121:
117:
112:
111:
108:
105:
104:
96:
88:
77:
75:
70:
66:Delivered by
59:
54:
52:
47:
42:
36:
30:
27:
23:
16:
499:
493:
470:
463:
457:
455:
418:
385:
335:
285:
188:
169:
152:my talk page
132:
113:
102:
101:
94:
92:
64:
41:the Teahouse
34:
32:
501:voting page
396:Nong Quanfu
388:Nong Zhigao
346:Nong Quanfu
338:Nong Zhigao
138:Hello, I'm
485:topic bans
425:Qiushufang
401:Qiushufang
358:Qiushufang
481:site bans
292:this edit
129:May 2021
508:NoACEMM
415:morals.
242:Mjroots
223:Mjroots
185:Warning
140:MarkH21
69:HostBot
394:, and
392:A Nong
350:A Nong
348:, and
298:Centre
304:Right
157:MarkH
148:civil
103:Helen
46:78.26
519:talk
471:The
429:talk
405:talk
362:talk
322:talk
301:Left
267:talk
227:talk
215:This
176:talk
120:talk
95:love
51:talk
100:🐍
53:).
33:Hi
521:)
510:}}
506:{{
483:,
431:)
407:)
390:,
364:)
344:,
340:,
324:)
269:)
229:)
178:)
160:21
122:)
106:🐍
517:(
427:(
403:(
382:.
360:(
320:(
308:✉
265:(
244::
240:@
225:(
174:(
118:(
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
