User talk:NotAnotherAliGFan

2258:

movie/TV series brings up IMDb as the first link. If IMDb were even slightly unreliable, it could not survive this long. I tend to trust those who have proved themselves as the greatest in the internet business over... how shall I put it... you :-) By the way, I made my own contributions there several years ago; it took them several weeks to get approved and only about half of them went through, which clearly shows that IMDb's fact checking process is long and there is certain filtering. I think it's only respectable to have good faith in what they're doing.

1861:. It is of interest to the readers and therefore, entitled to stay. You don't even read the article, so what interest do you have in editing it apart from reverting my edits? I strongly suggest reading policy exceptions, and understand that instead of adding constructive contributions, you blindly enforce policies, sometimes making little to no sense, thus harming the overall quality of articles instead of improving them. I'll find more links when I have the time. 2139:"One of the questions that arise when discussing a SP episode from the first few seasons is "hey, how did Kenny die in this one?" and here is where the fans come to look for answers." That's a big assumption (a little bit of OR if you will). Nowhere is that suggested in the article, and I don't see how discussions amongst fans of this sort would affect Knowledge (XXG) policy. Reiterating the materials twice in the same article is redundant, what else would it be? 2117:, no pejorative was aimed at you)? One of the questions that arise when discussing a SP episode from the first few seasons is "hey, how did Kenny die in this one?" and here is where the fans come to look for answers. It's important to the reader - I shouldn't repeat myself but you're leaving me no choice as you seem utterly oblivious to a very large portion of my explanations. The article makes much more sense that way - surely you cannot enter 1089: 1792:...and again, you're getting me wrong. Nowhere have I stated to "diss" WP rules - on the contrary, I'm doing my best to obtain better understanding and eventually, comply. What I was saying is that I think we all should be constructive and see how we benefit the reader, which is the primary reason behind the rules in the first place. Blind obedience is never too good. The most correct way for me to edit is to "get into the reader's shoes." 3049: 1345: 1818:, not to mock or put down. Secondly, what is this new line of retort meant to mean, you've said something similar elsewhere, that you wish to provide something from the point of view of a fan. In which case, you might be better advised to use a fan site or wiki, Knowledge (XXG) is meant for everyone to use. I can only assume you're trying to find another way to sneak in trivia and not bother citing any relevance. 2700: 3117: 1410: 4268: 2871: 2083:, what makes the subject itself of greater interest to the fans (in other words, the actual readers of the article). Therefore, it's only natural to create a separate section. Moreover - I currently fail to remember the name of the template, but it reads something like "Please focus on discussing the article rather than merely reiterating the plot." To me, this means that 642:

your second point, yes, I actually would leave the "cultural reference" alone (voluntarily!) if they were properly cited. Problem is, few of them are out of the hundreds added. As for your assertation that "somebody higher-up decided to step in and stop him", I have as much right to use and edit wikipedia as you do, no amount of bullying will have me stop.

4128: 2106:. Secondly, stating the circumstances of his death is just reiterating the plot, twice in one article. That Kenny dies a lot, is trivia, mention that in the character article, which is linked to in the episode articles. Why do we need character articles or general articles if you're going to repeat all that information again in each episode article? 3626: 3570: 2651: 391: 1291:

head for obvious reasons - I'm only educating the reader by providing the translation, the reader will then make their own synthesis without having to read mine (I don't think insulting the reader's intelligence is a part of what Knowledge (XXG) is about, yet you seem to love doing it, which you proved on numerous occasions).

1610:

Don't you agree that all editors are entitled to the same rights? If Alastairward feels the compulsive need to scrub my addition until I prove it's valid, I can too claim that the addition is entitled to stay until proven unsuitable. In a nutshell, "innocent until proven guilty" should apply here - sadly, it doesn't.

2516:- nevertheless, it looks like you are hitting the point that South Park articles' verifiability is not on stake as so many others that bear much more encyclopedic importance. I'll try and look for outside sources, but again - I've only been stating facts that can be proven by simply watching the show, 3019:

It is not the job of the article to explain every reference or gag to viewers when they watch the episode. This is an encyclopedia, not a viewing guide or viewing companion, and it is not the role of a synopsis to mention such things, it's to summarize the plot. As such, that level of detail may fall

2257:

is the largest online search engine/advertising vehicle today. Their rankings are scrupulously checked by the best in the business; had anything slipped their attention, it would have been remedied within a very short period of time. I have been reaching the same results over the past few years: each

2066:

Again, you miserably fail to understand the idea behind the primary purpose of a SP article being presented here: for people who saw the episode, but want to obtain better understanding of its various nuances. It's highly unusual that the same character would die in every episode and come back in the

1624:

With all due respect, that analogy is more akin to "He Started It" than "Innocent until proven guilty". Whether another editor's conduct was acceptable or not is immaterial to the fact that your conduct was unacceptable. No one forced you to do anything; if you and another editor disagree, then go to

1271:

Yes, it's a language. And no, it's not the language of this, the English language Knowledge (XXG). Please provide an accurate translation if you wish to have what you wrote taken the way you want. And why did you link to that talk page? Please indicate what discussion there applies here. Suggesting a

3872:

I have had phish sign me up for junk mail, but that is the extend of the abuse. There is no junk mail coming from wikipedia. A lot of people use special email accounts only for wikipedia. If you notice almost all veteran editors have email. It is an incredibly effective tool. This is a public forum,

2087:

trivia, which are relevant to the episode, along with outstanding recurring gags/catchphrases, belong in the article - again, to make it interesting for the reader. You seem to have forgotten that Knowledge (XXG) is there for the reader, not for the editor. Policies are great, but merely adhering to

1518:

In reviewing your edits to the article, it is clear that you were edit-warring, and that the block is valid. It's clear that you disagree with the other editor, and you might have a point - but the place to assert that point is on the discussion page, and not by reverting the article repeatedly. You

1323:

You seem to be adding a lot of cites to articles, which is good. But then you seem to be adding a lot of uncited material and giving nonsense edit summaries, or none at all. Please discuss changes that are so clearly challenged on the talk pages for articles. An Admin has already asked you to do so.

3836:

Activate your email, not to necessarily talk to me, but to talk to everyone on wikipedia. Instead of speaking your mind here, when you get angry, you can do it off wiki, to people who are sympathetic, with no future repercussions. Remember that every edit can be used against you in the future. Edit

2209:

franchise, I wouldn't even dare question them (asking for tips doesn't mean they take anyone's information). As for Gawker - well, it might be somewhat arguable, but reliable nonetheless, as at least one other editor pointed out. As for IMDb (for some reason, you keep capitalizing the "b" - another

2023:

No incivility, I'm just asking for clarification. You entered information in the article without seeing any relevance for it, may I ask then why I shouldn't simply remove it? If you're making an uncited suggestion of a link between the two (whether you say so explicitly or not) then that would seem

1838:

You added a claim, backed up by a link that didn't work for me at least, that there was a Russian translation of the word Toad that came out as "жаба". I don't speak Russian, so I don't know how that is pronounced. But I'm not sure at all what relevance there is to the article. Is it a coincidence?

1609:

You couldn't be more wrong. This user seems to challenge as many of my edits as possible, forcing me to prove him that my cites are valid and my additions deserve to be on Knowledge (XXG). I'm not the one playing God and going around questioning anything that might not be to my own personal liking.

641:

That first bit isnt actually true, the Admin asked that I leave one specific reference alone, not that I should cease and desist all editing of so called "cultural references". In that case I disagree with their decision, but defer to an admin's right to ban or suspend an account. With reference to

465:

Perhaps when you leave replies on another person's talk page you could do so like this. Instead of hitting the "new section" option at the top of the page, simply edit the section you added first and mark each new comment with a number of colons (depending on how many new answers you've added) as I

450:

and make no outlandish claims you couldn't verify from watching the episode. You on the other hand made some claims that can only be verified by asking the show's writers. How it is that you link a rugby game in a British surrealist film with an ice hockey game in South Park is beyond me. If you're

4191:

Both of you, please stop. AliG, it is not appropriate to put your arguments to other editors in invisible text in the article. State your arguments on a Talk Page, and if necessary, solicit participation by other editors for a consensus discussion. And Alastair, I do not see any "threats" to other

3951:

Elementary, Dr. Watson: this falls under the same category, albeit indirectly. An attack can be carried in a number of ways; one of those ways is to harm Palestinian civilians by depriving them from any humanitarian aid in order to have a very convenient excuse to point at Israel as the aggressor.

2159:

Southparkstudios is a great source for cites, I added quite a few from that site myself. It's great because it's the creation of the show's creators and they add input to the FAQ regularly. I've not figured out the tags for videos yet, one or two misspellings made me think they were fan added. But

1960:

I didn't imply that anywhere, I just put related facts together ("looks like a toad" and "his name translates to toad in Russian") - the fact that it was so easy for you to make the connection doesn't mean I made it in any way. This only proves how obvious the connection is, I was only putting two

1290:

I'm not as dumb as you may think I am - of course I see a clear connection!!! But - in no way will I ever explicitly write it in a Knowledge (XXG) article, as it would truly be my own analysis and what not. When I saw Jabba and heard his name for the first time, the relation instantly popped in my

2958:

Can you name a few South Park articles with uncited cultural references that keep getting removed? I've cited the Jefferson's article using imdb (a reliable source), so if it gets removed again be sure to report it to an administrator. Whenever I have the time, I'd like to go through and cite the

1975:

Ok, good, now we're getting places. So you freely admit that you see no link between the two bits of information other than coincidence. Please tell me then, what is the relevance to this article. What do we learn from this fact that you've added. Perhaps you can add some evidence of consensus to

3339:

Because our reversions are a direct fulfillment of WP policy and proper writing standards. But in any event, when there is a conflict where interpretation of policy is being disputed, the proper thing is to discuss it, and you'll notice that as of this writing, the current version of the article

3292:

I note the concerns above about my editing history. This is unrelated to the 3RR blocking, if you feel I have tried to "own" an article or have violated your "rights", an edit war is not the right way to discuss this. Do so in the wikiquette page or alert an admin. But of course you have done so

3202:

This seems rather one sided, doesn't it? What about the other party (check Alastairward's edit history for Feb. 12)? Will I ever get the answer as for certain users owning Knowledge (XXG) articles? I thought it was forbidden as well... In any case, I apologize for violating 3RR again but I would

3003:

of a story's most salient points. It is not a blow-by-blow account, and does not need to highlight specific gags, one liners, or bits of continuity trivia. Whether it's mentioned on the FAQ page (though for some reason that was not the page I was directed to when I first tried that url) does not

2465:

As you will see from that policy page, the burden of evidence is expected to fall on the person introducing new material. Knowledge (XXG)'s community is becoming less tolerant of unverified assertions, as each one of these statistically adds extra risk to our credibility. It appears one of your

2366:

In answer to your query on my talk page, I only ever suggested that the FAQs on southparkstudios.com seem to be provided for by the show's writers. I thought at first that the tags might be useful, but then I saw a few spelling mistakes and wondered. Perhaps you might prove your assertation that

2217:

You act like the priest in the egg coloring episode (you should know which one, right?) - willing to kill the Pope and Jesus because they "got soft on you." Just acknowledge that your personal comprehension is for itself "original research" and try thinking how to actually benefit the community.

1212:

that "this is an interesting piece of information connected to the etymology of Jabba's name". This suggests strongly then that you are connecting the look of the character with the choice of name, that there is an intent, a pun here. Therefore, unless you can provide a cite that shows intent on

1752:

I do not "simply revert anything" - at times, I don't add edit summaries because I discuss it elsewhere. Notice though that I'm still fairly new to WP, and in my later edits there is much more summary given per edit. As I see it, the difference between me and you is that your primary concern is

4064:). So a simple definition for one word is not a sufficient cite unless the connection is there also. The cite you are providing is also to a Hebrew (I presume) page that can't be followed by those who don't read Hebrew, and, apparently, links to a dictionary definition of one of the words. 2474:

also. Although the community tends to look down on trivia section, the information you are introducing is not necessary looked down upon. Just needs to be introduced in another way. The specific point about how many times a character's homosexuality is hinted at ... it is a minor violation of

2232:

Please explain why google rank is a reason to include the information given in Knowledge (XXG), I don't see how that logic works. It just means as I understand it, that the site is linked to a lot. Are we to believe that a correct spelling of the acronym for the site is all that qualifies its

1941:

facts". How is this translation related to the article, other than through the rather tortured logic you provided? Did the writers of the film deliberately reference the Russian translation? (By the way, the link you gave didn't work, I would suggested the Babelfish translator if you must.)

1875:

I don't see how it falls under the article you suggested. Again, where is the link or relevance? Is it a mere conincidence (in which case it's a pretty slim bit of trivia) or an inspiration for the writers of the film? Why do you think it should be added? What does it bring to the article?

3989:

Thanks for the friendly reminder, though you should know your next revert will push you to 4, and with your block log it would be a decent block if you were to be reported. Thanks again though, but think about addressing this issues with your edit instead of trying to force them through.

968:. Please understand that I am not saying that either one of you is correct, and will not make the call as to say whether or not the citation is inappropriate or not. What I will say is that, instead of edit warring, both of you need to take your "discussion" (dispute) to the articles 2931:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.

1142:

means? However obvious you may think it is, you've still compare two sources and decided for yourself that one must reference the other. Find a cite that actually says that Lucas or anyone else wanted to reference the Russian for toad and the information is much more likely to stay.

1918:

This is exactly what I've done here. I've added the fact that Jabba's name translates to toad in Russian, next to the comparison of Jabba to a toad by Roger Ebert and the footnote to the respective cite. I'm putting this sentence back and I'll greatly appreciate you moving on.

1753:"would it comply with WP policies?" while mine is "would the reader find it interesting?" - I'm reminding you (again) that Knowledge (XXG) is out there for the reader. WP works for the reader, while the editor works for Knowledge (XXG) - ergo, the editor works for the reader. 2534:

The problem with the WP:NOTOR policy as you interpret it, is that you think it means you add anything that is stated on screen. That leads to plot repetition, unless you can state why it is important to see this information, in which case you draw near to OR or plain trivia.

2271:, given that they are one of the most successful blog networks and have a defined team of writers and editors, we can consider them reliable enough - again, nonsense would not have survived that long unless Gawker were a publicly self-proclaimed tabloid (which they are not). 608:

Sorry, that's not the way wikipedia works. As you can see from my edit history, I've been working on scrubbing original research from all the South Park episode guides. That's why I've come across your edits and removed them. Nothing personal, you've just crossed my path.

949:

and see I'm not the only person dismayed by his compulsive behavior. I firmly believe that a valid cite is entitled to stay, whether a particular editor likes it or not. I'll appreciate a detailed response from an administrator. I apologize if I caused any inconvenience.

1856:

It's not my problem you don't speak Russian - the pronunciation is indisputable. The relevance is that "incidentally, the Russian word for toad sounds exactly like Jabba's name" - apart from that, there was no suggestion made as for "source," if anything it falls under

1573:(conflict) User:NotAnotherAliGFan, it is not impressive that your only concern here seems to be to call out someone else's behaviour. An unblocking admin needs to see evidence that you intend to change, not that that someone else needs to change also. The other user, 3340:

still contains the material you favor. There's already been a Third Opinion on this on that article's Talk Page, but if you really want to argue your point of view about writing synopses, then please join that discussion to respond directly to our points. Thanks.

3532:

Threats? God forbid! I was only referring to your level of luck, as well as the indisputable fact that as soon as you've logged in today, you started by reverting my edits on pages that you previously didn't even know existed! Geez, and I'm being accused here...

3966:

That isnt a reprisal attack unless a source says it is. You cant just use your own thinking as justification for text in articles, doesnt work like that. if you want that section in the article bring a source that connects the topics, dont just use you own

1114:

Since this is the English language Knowledge (XXG), a cite for the translation would be nice. And why do you need a source to say he looks like a toad, when he's already described as being slug like? Is there a limit to the articles that I can edit now?

2762:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 3800:, in which you stated "Yes there was, our opinions are equal (none is superior over the other, right?) so it stays (with the added trivia tag)". The issue is not whether your opinions are "equal" or whether one is "superior" to another. The issue is 1130:

In line with the advice from the admin above, please state why you feel it is necessary to have the Russian translation of the English word "toad" on the Jabba the Hut article. At the moment, the material can be removed as mere speculation (see

588:

Simply this, I don't have time to edit everything on Knowledge (XXG)! Pointing out that I've not edited every article you think should concern me, does not prove you right. Besides which, other Knowledge (XXG) articles are not valid references.

2715:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the

849:

proved what was asserted was provided. The one that you provided simply stated that the assertion (regarding the Oceans 11 parody) was true and gave nothing to back up that suggestion. Since it's been made redundant, it can be safely removed.

2296:

And what of trademarks. Again I ask, what does that mean for article verifiability. There's a big step in logic saying that South Park is a trademark of Comedy Partners, to saying that an unsourced opinion on one of their other websites is

1275:

Saying that you've stated a reason for making an edit in the summary, then denying that was your intent won't work. Unfortunately you've left an indelible mark on Knowledge (XXG), I hope you don't mind me quoting it in future discussions!

2999:. Its removal was not "aggressive" nor without discussion. It had been removed countless times before when people kept trying to reinsert it, ever since the night that episode premiered. I will explain it one more time: A synopsis is a 2052:

I don't see how it merits it's own section in an article. If Kenny's death is a running gag, mention it on the character's page. As it is, the deaths are just another part of the plot and so as deserving of as much detail as the rest.

1161:

This is the english language wikipedia. I have no idea what "жаба" is supposed to spell and I make no apology for asking for some sort of explanation. Is there any link, even coincidental, between that word and the english word

2002:

a lot of connection between them, I have presented them together. The relevance is that these are facts concerning Jabba's name (again, I have only put them together, I did not state in the article that "one, therefore two."

1581:, but has nevertheless received a shorter block for repeated frivolous edit warring. The time delay in blocking each of you was because I was reviewing Alastair's contributions. It might benefit you during your block to read 2512:, as it's important to the episode and the characters. Stating events derived from watching the episodes do not need further sources, as the episodes themselves are more than plenty. I fail to understand the connection to 2441:

I would finally add, for the moment that is, that as someone adding material to Knowledge (XXG) that has been challenged, it is up to you to give adequate reason for it to stay. Give reasons, discuss, build consensus i.e.

2031:

of proof is on you, the editor adding the material, please can you provide a proper cite (the translation through Google doesn't seem to work) and some consensus for this addition. Otherwise, I see reason for removing it.

1495:

I am not the only person who broke this rule - check Alastairward's history please. Also, I'd appreciate if you (the admin that blocked me) contacted me first rather than just blocking one-sidedly. I await your response.

573:

Needless to say, what you put on my talk page is not a cite for either episode. A user edited site like TV.com is not definitive in any way shape or form. Get a cite from the producers, then you add that material again.

2236:

Why would you not dare question the Comedy Central sources? The South Park article merely mentions that CC distributes and airs South Park, not that they own it. Why do they need tips and contributors if they "own" the

1770:

If you simply wish to disseminate information to readers, there are any number of blogs, wikis, fan sites for you to do so. Knowledge (XXG) works along guidelines that suggest how information should best be presented.

261:

You just wrote to me about changing the Seth MacFarlane page??? What's warning level 2? Are you calling me a vandalist because... uhm... I figured that 1999-1973=26 and not 24? I'll appreciate your quick response.

4349:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2995:. It's not like I removed the continuity but left in the comment. I removed all of it. Your comment implies that one was left in and the other removed, which is obviously not the case, which you can see if you 739:

Might you then explain why you think your reference was valid before adding it again. The burden of proof is on you as the editor adding it. Also, please give an edit summary instead of simply reverting edits.

3869:

I have had email for four years. As long as I am careful with who I e-mail, it is not a problem. I have been phished several times, but again, as long as I don't respond, no one gets my email or IP address.

3690:"If you read Alastairward's Talk Page, you'll see that I already told him that there was an ongoing discussion, and speculated that he was not aware of this, which he confirmed on the article's Talk Page." 824:

The word "poor," as just used by yourself, constitutes the very essence of original research. This only proves your double-standards. My cite has every right to stay, regardless of your personal opinion.

2121:

of Kenny's deaths on the character's page! It's particular to each episode, it's an outstanding moment in each episode (again, read my previous answer) and therefore, it deserves a section of its own.

1670:. Some admin really needs to step in and resolve this, blocking both sides of a constant multiple-editor edit war does nothing more than piss us off, and the edits in question remain a very gray area. 2606:

The purpose of this tag is for people to notice it and contribute to the article - as a footnote it makes less sense. I'm not removing your tag, but merely adding another for the reason listed above.

677:"Hi. Continuity with regards to previous episodes is not what "Cultural references" means. In addition, as Alastair pointed out above, unsourced speculation cannot be added to article, as it violates 4290: 4102:

Yeah, if stating that stealing food and blankets from needy civilians is wrong constitutes a POV... we're in much larger trouble here. As I told Nableezy, you cannot undo history by sweeping traces.

2402:

Episode continuity is trivia, not a cultural reference. Character history available at character page. If you are stating something with the cited intent of the writers, it would seem to fall under

1205:

material. If you have information to add, then cite it. It seems that you have decided to add, on your own admission, uncited material, which makes it even more likely to be challenged and removed.

2180:

they have a system of verification in place, they don't tell us who or where they check their plot synopsis against or which ones have been checked and which haven't. It all seems too unreliable.

4282:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 4228:

to include this reference. Hence I have reverted your edit, since it seems that another editor feels it should not be included. On proving it's "not trivia", that, I'm afraid, is incorrect.

4147:

prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for

2214:

movie/series and see what comes up first (second in the worst case). Given that, I trust them when they claim that their information is sourced. In a nutshell: all three sources are good.

1235:, I don't have to cite a language, at which I'm still pretty fluent. As for synthesis - well, I'm making a suggestion in the edit summary, but not within the article itself. I'm putting " 3273:

Hi. I'm sorry to hear you were blocked, but once it expires, can you please share your thoughts on the Pandemic Talk Page? I solicited a Third Opinion, and continued a discussion on it

1640:

My conduct has always been to defend myself from stalkers that cling to any loose end of a WP rule to annul my contributions. Unfortunately, I can't say the same about the other party.

4289:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

921:: this applies even if you think or know you are correct. Edit warring helps nobody, and actually harms the page in question, and the encyclopedia. To contest this block please place 2830:

article out before telling other people that your new edits must stay pending your approval of change via the edit summary. You made a bold change, I reverted, now we can discuss.

1179:

Then look it up, it's easily verifiable - both the translation and the pronunciation. The link doesn't work because I've yet to find a way to incorporate the character "|" into the

2300:

In no way have you proved that any assertation on one of these websites that you used is verifiable. If we can't see where they get their information from, why should we trust it?

700:

Hi, the cite you added was for a blog of some sort, not really a reliable source. I don't know why I have to wait for an admin to suggest action before I edit the article either.

1738:

The difference between you and I seems to be that I do give edit summaries, discuss with reference to WP Policies and do not simply revert everything the other person edited in.

4232:

states clearly that the onus to justify inclusion of content is on the editor seeking to add it. So the ball is now in your court, and I invite you to discuss this matter on

3810:

opinions, not just one, determined that that information not remain in the article. Reverting against consensus is considered disruptive editing, so please do not revert it.

3779: 3646: 3586: 2671: 2289:

And what of Google rankings? So they're used to show how popular a site is, again what of it? How does that prove that something is reliable? There's a related policy here;

3876:

I removed your comments on my talk page, you are welcome to continue the discussion here, or start a new section there. I added the cookie to my awards page, thanks again.

2962:

Thank you, and please reply on my talk page. An administrator has warned both me and Alastairward to not talk to each other, so please don't get him involved in this. I'd

1523:), but you failed to participate in that discussion. It is unreasonable to tell others to discuss the matter while you revert away - that's not an acceptable way to edit. 806:

You chimed in on an unrelated note. The other user, Drewmartial, was adding uncited (and really poorly spelled) speculation to WP and reverting my attempts to remove it.

2624:, which explains why stub tags are placed where they are. If you simply add an extra tag like that, it will simply be removed, and cause more work for us stub-sorters. 451:

too lazy to find a cite, that's your problem not mine. I see your original research remains off the article page, I assume you have therefore accepted this judgement.

2766:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 2345:

is hinted at" - complete specualation on your part as to what constitutes a "hint" of homosexuality. And I would argue that this episode is a clear validation of his

809:

You're adding a poor cite, a blog of all things and demanding it be accepted as the be all and end all of cites. I'm perfectly entitled to remove it if I see fit.

3873:

and I have a lot of nasty editors here who would like nothing more than to ban me forever, so this is all I am going to say about this. Again, it is your funeral.

3157: 1450: 1065:

Ebert seemed to be referring (as did other users) to the credits and technical information. We're not discussing that, we're talking about cultural references.

2890: 1165:

BTW, the link in the reference just leads me to a blank translation page, which doesn't translate the word for me, I might suggest you try another translator.

663:

You know what I'm about to say don't you, your edit was speculation and was removed. Sorry, but you seem determined to go against the guidelines around here.

4004:

I'm trying to... but you reverted based on your own opinion that the subjects are unrelated. By the way, I've already filed the report while I warned you...

3266:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1767:

That's a big admission on your behalf and I think it's where the problem arises. Knowledge (XXG) doesn't just work for the reader, it works in a certain way.

1558:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1102: 3366:

Hi, you've added a sentence about modern hebrew slang, but the meaning or significance of the sentence is unclear. Can you elaborate or clarify please? --

1858: 4057:. It appears that this policy has been pointed out to you a number of times before, but you still aren't following what constitutes original synthesis. 3932:

You need to provide a source linking humanitarian aid to the reprisal attacks, the article is about something in specific. The article on the conflict is

627:

cultural references. As long as we cite them with a valid source, he can't touch them. Its about time somebody higher-up decided to step in and stop him.

2483:, which would cover this assertion. Though understandably you realise that counting is not really up there with, say, the kind of thing that goes on at 2067:

next one like nothing happened. It's that small part that recurs one time after another in numerous variations - just like the chalkboard/couch gags in

198: 4155:. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. 2177: 540:. The edits were, as I'm sure you realise, your own personal speculation. If you can add a cite sometime to back up your edits, it would be welcome. 90: 2827: 2804: 1251:" without advancing any opinion. (As Russian doesn't have a sound, the closest you get is .) Maybe we can stop this hair-splitting farce already? 3152: 1445: 338: 277: 497:

It isn't about proving you wrong - what you are typing is pure speculation - you have to prove yourself right before anything else is added. See

2833:

You might have noticed that I didn't say that what you added couldn't stay full stop, merely that you had added it to an inappropriate section.

1272:

link between the translation of one word in Russian and the character name requires a leap of logic, one that you have suggested but not cited.

4107:

By the way, what I was doing was merely reinserting the paragraph that stated documented facts, you are most welcome to check relevant diffs.

3251: 2789: 1839:

If so, what is the relevance to the article? Is it a source for the character's name, then if so cite, the translation alone would fall under

1690:

Glad to see you two in a dialog, as you both have Wiki's best interests at heart. I won't wade in, but did find a nice cite for Janbba's age.

1543: 1039:

Similarly so, Southparkstuff is not the website for the creators of South Park, admins or not it is still run by fans. Where are their cites?

993:

Since we're off our block, do you want to try that? I've tried discussing it in a civil manner with you already, would you try to care again?

85: 3829:

Thanks for the cookie. I would advise giving out barnstars in the future, they are more coveted, and appreciated, and they cost you nothing.

1054:

Please take Alastairward's advice and discuss your changes on the articles talk page. Failure to do so will result in another block. Thanks,

1008: 969: 4374: 1961:

facts that are closely related (even as a coincidence) without stating any of my understanding of the connection between those two facts.

221: 165: 4018:

You need to bring a source that connects them, and you should have provided a link to the noticeboard in the warning you put on my page.

3717: 3203:

really like some positive input from you regarding this matter, as I truly feel my rights as a WP editor are being constantly violated.

2024:

to go against WP:SYNTH. If you're suggesting it's a coincidence of some sort, it would seem to be a bit of trivia, that can be removed.

2944: 1631: 1529: 471: 4257: 3293:

before, and nothing was found to back your claims. Perhaps you might try discussing all this with the editors whose work you revert.

2210:

indication of how little you visit and know the actual site) - this is the largest movie/TV online database known today. Just Google

3407:

You linked a character with a WP topic and insist on it staying, despite not giving a reference or policy. Would you mind doing so?

2293:. Knowledge (XXG) is not run by weight of numbers, but by discussion. Google rankings are not related to reliability of information. 2170:

seem doubtful. The fact that ccinsider asks for tips from anyone made me suspicious, they both seemed to fall under the umbrella of

872:

comes into play. Can you tell us why gawker.com is a good reference? Or why we need it when a far better source has been presented?

717:

Hello again. Please don't take offence, I just didn't see the cite you gave as particularly reliable and as such, to be challenged.

3073: 2778: 1373: 395: 976:

and constructive manner that ensures the best for the article. If issues become worse, or talking with the other party fails, try

4050:. Do not add your edit back into the article until consensus has been reached there. It would also very much help if you would 907: 4196:. Please work through your conflicts in a civil manner, or take a step back and cool down before continuing editing. Thank you. 3641:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to 3634: 3578: 2666:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to 2659: 203: 4370: 3609:

for disruption. Please discuss having a consensus discussion on the Talk Page. Do not revert, and do not attack other editors.

3171: 2959:

uncited CR that are so constantly removed, so please point any out to me so I can dig up the cites and get them posted again.

2382:

Any further comment? I have raised this on the reliable sources board but you didn't seem to give much in the way of analysis.

1464: 1369: 533: 2733: 1586: 912: 70: 34: 4092: 3933: 3102: 2493: 2267:. They are all under the same umbrella, which makes them closely linked; therefore, if one is reliable, they all are. As for 1599: 1398: 4152: 4144: 3085: 2717: 2712: 1385: 469:

Now that we've got that out of the way, I found a very nice summing up of dealing with uncited claims and original research

108: 3401: 4275: 3668:

The Diff I provided just above pretty much shows what I'm talking about. Saying, "Get some glasses please" is not civil.

2886: 2773: 403: 321:

At twenty-four, MacFarlane was television's youngest executive producer when Family Guy first aired in January 31, 1999.

4361:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

4140: 3642: 3606: 3448:

You linked to nothing and suggested it might be common sense. Be specific, or else you're just going round in circles.

3130: 3065: 3056: 2988:

The rape comment seems pretty much out of the blue without pointing out the episode continuity from The China Probrem."

2723: 2667: 2509: 1956:

The translation is the name of the character, who serves as the article's subject... can't get more related than that.

1423: 1361: 1352: 323:

Albeit English isn't my first language (therefore, "vandalist"), my conclusion looks pretty logical. Don't you agree?

80: 4366: 4279: 4261: 4085: 1711:

Since I'm off my block first, but you can still edit your talk page, I thought I'd ask for your opinion on the below.

3124: 1417: 319:

Hopefully, I'll soon learn how to properly respond - until then, I'm posting here... in any case, the exact quote is

141: 2759: 37:

to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for contributing. Here are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement.

3129:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1724:

Hmm... if this is truly the case, why did you revert before obtaining consensus? Shoot first, ask questions later?

1422:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2183: 1202: 865: 123: 4224:

Having looked at previous discussions of this issue on the article's Talk page it appears that there is no clear

4088: 3097: 2971: 2574: 2488: 2350: 2330: 1699: 1675: 1594: 1393: 1095: 1088: 946: 657: 632: 3471: 2728:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a 1775:

is how we benefit users, by providing verification of what we say instead of assuming that something is obvious.

1582: 1293:

Suggesting a link between the translation of one word in Russian and the character name requires a leap of logic

236: 75: 3630: 1217:

now and that last edit (which is saved for posterity) proves it. More than a mere translation is now required.

1007:

In line with the dispute resolution suggestion above, would you care to discuss the reason behind the edit war

780: 226: 3721: 3605:

on the article's Talk Page. The comment you left was not needed, and continued personal attacks will lead to

4246: 3778:

Hello, NotAnotherAliGFan. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at

3683:

Yeah, I'm human after all and usually have little patience for mind games. Can't you read between the lines?

2513: 2484: 779:

I've answered on your talk page. Besides, I was referring to the person you had problems with in regards to

2057: 1847: 1715: 326: 289: 288:

Seth MacFarlane produced other cartoons, and said in interviews that FOX came to him when he was 24. Plus,

265: 188: 4174: 4163: 4108: 4005: 3953: 3891: 3787: 3764: 3697: 3574: 3556: 3534: 3522: 3499: 3475: 3453: 3431: 3412: 3386: 3318: 3298: 3204: 3135: 2940: 2853: 2812: 2655: 2607: 2540: 2521: 2451: 2426: 2411: 2387: 2372: 2305: 2272: 2245: 2219: 2191: 2144: 2122: 2089: 2037: 2004: 1981: 1962: 1947: 1920: 1881: 1862: 1823: 1793: 1783: 1754: 1743: 1725: 1667: 1641: 1611: 1497: 1428: 1329: 1302: 1281: 1252: 1222: 1184: 1170: 1148: 1120: 1070: 1044: 1016: 998: 951: 877: 855: 826: 814: 784: 769: 745: 722: 705: 668: 647: 614: 594: 579: 560: 556: 545: 510: 480: 456: 433: 407: 330: 269: 4362: 4225: 3802: 2729: 2290: 2264:

Comedy Central, South Park and all related titles, logos and characters are trademarks of Comedy Partners

231: 170: 4201: 4060:

Your addition appears to make a connection between a number of words (in what way is still unclear, see

3815: 3673: 3658: 3614: 3345: 3282: 3037: 3009: 1994:. This is the exact opposite of what I claim and keep proving to you: I, personally, made no suggestion 1201:

of proof is on you remember). Look at the link just above the edit summary box, it asks that we provide

686: 40: 4314:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 4159: 4148: 3783: 3760: 3594: 3552: 3518: 3495: 3449: 3408: 3294: 3021: 2849: 2808: 2704: 2554: 2536: 2447: 2422: 2407: 2383: 2368: 2301: 2241: 2187: 2140: 2033: 1977: 1943: 1877: 1819: 1779: 1739: 1574: 1325: 1277: 1218: 1166: 1144: 1116: 1066: 1040: 1012: 994: 942: 873: 851: 810: 765: 741: 718: 701: 664: 643: 610: 590: 575: 541: 476: 452: 429: 193: 65: 2919: 2878: 2864: 2504:

I've already changed "hinted at" to "called by another character" - this is pure fact stating. As for

4319: 2967: 1692: 1671: 628: 4338: 4329: 3032:

noteworthy. If you insist on this, then we can get a Third Opinion, or have a consensus discussion.

1897:

Compiling related facts and information from independent sources is part of writing an encyclopedia.

977: 965: 903: 869: 3863: 3751:

This one is pretty ridiculous, I have reverted edits you made to my userspace simply because it is

3317:

Why don't you (or the other editors) try discussing all this with me, whose work you're reverting?

1138:

Every piece of information has a right to stay, until read and verified. Don't you understand what

1055: 981: 930: 690: 672: 537: 4358: 4342: 4229: 3025: 2841: 2505: 2471: 2443: 2028: 1198: 918: 4241: 4023: 3995: 3980: 3941: 3736: 3371: 2630: 2594: 1232: 4173:

I still don't see any WP guideline that requires me to cite what's heard in the episode itself.

4054: 3972: 3693: 3510: 3427: 2837: 2517: 2403: 2103: 1991: 1840: 1214: 1139: 973: 894: 2904:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

4069: 2934: 1626: 1524: 4354: 4346: 2621: 498: 398:

or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to

113: 4300:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

4197: 3811: 3669: 3654: 3610: 3494:

OK, now you've deigned to quote a policy, be specific and say what part of it applies here.

3341: 3278: 3260: 3091: 3033: 3005: 2743: 2708: 2681: 2316: 1552: 682: 4357:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4350: 4311: 4301: 4294: 4283: 4237: 3936:. This article is about reprisal attacks by Hamas, not whatever you think Hamas did wrong. 3756: 3069: 2882: 2763: 2692: 2326: 2174:. If you trust it enough to use it when citing, you surely must be ok with telling us why. 2171: 1578: 1365: 764:

Of course, if you feel you must stoop to abuse, then why should anyone take you seriously.

118: 4315: 3601:

that there was an ongoing discussion, and speculated that he was not aware of this, which

3048: 2909: 2097: 1344: 255: 3968: 3081: 3077: 2476: 1381: 1377: 502: 348:

General content dispute and not vandalism. I moved the fact where the comment made sense

1036:

IMDB may have admins, but it in no way displays cites for the information they display.

444: 399: 3909: 3881: 3845: 3232: 2785: 2202: 2072: 1033:

Please explain why you believe that the websites you are using for cites are reliable.

623:

Don't worry - he's been warned by an administrator to knock off the moving/removing of

428:

are the one who has to verify it. Give me a cite for that information and it can stay.

4274:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

4127: 2881:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

2699: 1911:

Let the reader draw their own conclusions after seeing related facts in juxtaposition.

678: 506: 4304:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

4061: 4047: 4019: 3991: 3976: 3937: 3732: 3585:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please 3382: 3367: 2923:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 2625: 2589: 2564: 2342: 2080: 2076: 352:. I have deleted your vandalism warning too, since it was a content dispute. Cheers. 3952:

You know it very well, do you really think you can undo history by sweeping traces?

1213:

behalf of the writers, this is merely trivia and uncited at that. You're going into

3859:

Thanks for the advice, but I think the e-mail thing can be easily abused, can't it?

2068: 353: 293: 4378: 4323: 4251: 4205: 4182: 4167: 4116: 4096: 4074: 4027: 4013: 3999: 3984: 3961: 3945: 3913: 3899: 3885: 3849: 3819: 3791: 3768: 3740: 3725: 3705: 3677: 3662: 3618: 3560: 3542: 3526: 3503: 3483: 3457: 3439: 3416: 3394: 3375: 3349: 3326: 3302: 3286: 3241: 3212: 3107: 3041: 3013: 2975: 2948: 2857: 2816: 2793: 2748: 2686: 2636: 2615: 2600: 2544: 2529: 2498: 2455: 2430: 2415: 2391: 2376: 2355: 2335: 2309: 2280: 2249: 2227: 2195: 2148: 2130: 2041: 2012: 1985: 1970: 1951: 1928: 1885: 1870: 1827: 1801: 1787: 1762: 1747: 1733: 1704: 1679: 1649: 1635: 1619: 1604: 1533: 1505: 1403: 1333: 1310: 1285: 1260: 1226: 1192: 1174: 1152: 1124: 1074: 1060: 1048: 1020: 1002: 986: 959: 935: 881: 859: 834: 818: 792: 773: 749: 726: 709: 651: 636: 618: 598: 583: 568: 549: 517: 484: 460: 437: 414: 374: 342: 314: 281: 4135:

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at

1904:

Comparing and contrasting conflicting facts and opinion is not original research.

292:. No, I am not calling you a vandal. Just be careful when editing pages. Cheers. 3274: 2840:(no personal attacks on someone's perceived ethnic background) and remember the 2738: 2676: 4267: 2870: 1815: 4218: 3517:

I see you have now escalated to threats on my talk page now, care to explain?

2206: 3806:. The consensus discussion on that episode's Talk Page, which is composed of 448: 4233: 3905: 3877: 3841: 1301:

the character's name! Your feeble Socratic tactics are amusing to the most.

1958:

Did the writers of the film deliberately reference the Russian translation?

2240:

And none of this explains or demonstrates the reliability of these sites.

945:

sucking all the fun out of reading South Park articles on WP. Please read

3782:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

3360: 3625: 3569: 2650: 2487:. You really can't find an outside source that verifies this assertion? 390: 4345:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

4136: 3759:

to the 3RR rule, I can revert as many times as I like on my own pages.

2901:

which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

1814:

Now you've lost me. For a start, disseminate means to spread, as in to

3731:

The first sentence is as observed on screen, the rest needs citation.

2799:"Personal interpretations and biased presentation of sourced material" 1990:

Either your English needs serious improvement or you are straight out

2254: 2163: 3225:

What others did does not matter in unblock requests. This is about

2894: 2261:

Now for Comedy Central. Quoting from the South Park studios site,

4291:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Trapper Keeper (South Park)

1589:(along with the articles linked on the top-right template headed 4214: 2898: 2349:-homosexuality - he throws up after giving Cartman a hickey. -- 2088:

those policies without fully understanding them is plain wrong.

2769:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2570:

template - it has been re-sorted to a more specific stub type (

2205:'s main website. As the owners (at least at some point) of the 1197:

If it's easily verifiable, then provide the cite yourself (the

3591:"you're lucky this is the cyber world, you miserable stalker." 2481:

includes unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas

152: 52: 24: 4266: 4126: 3115: 3047: 2927:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

2869: 2754:

Image copyright problem with Image:Valcanite Anal Douche.JPG

1408: 1343: 1105:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1087: 1998:

as for connecting these two, but given the fact that there

3248:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1778:

It's something you'll have to address when editing here.

1540:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

3597:. If you read Alastairward's Talk Page, you'll see that 3268:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2588:(and in the right place, at the bottom of the article). 2186:

over "fact", which the above would, IMO take away from.

2167: 1560:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

783:

and the overall feeling these kinds of actions inflict.

4193: 3797: 3650: 3602: 3598: 3590: 3185: 3181: 3175: 3166: 3162: 3148: 3144: 3140: 2996: 2987: 2585: 2581: 2467: 2323: 1520: 1478: 1474: 1468: 1459: 1455: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1209: 349: 1233:

you don't have to cite what you see with your own eyes

3780:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

2268: 964:

Both you and User:Alastairward have been blocked for

681:. Please do not add such information to the article. 3837:

wisely. that is why you need email, to vent offline.

3123:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

3084:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may 1519:

even acknowledge that there was discussion ongoing (

1416:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

1384:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may 1094:Hello, NotAnotherAliGFan. You have new messages at 1937:Read what you copied from that article, "Compiling 3551:So, no explanation for the threats you have made? 290:the article says he was 24 when he begin producing 4337:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 4236:. I see from above that you are already aware of 3649:and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ( 2560:Please don't retag this article with the generic 3716:Isn't he a moron? Ruining South Park articles.-- 2674:and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. 1668:User_talk:Alastairward#Block_for_revert-warring 1666:If its any good, Alastairward was blocked too: 910:. It is essential that you are more careful to 4151:, even if they do not technically violate the 3593:is indeed a threat, and is indeed a breach of 2883:section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion 2788:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 917:with the user in question, rather than simply 4084:I've blocked you for 12h for edit warring at 3589:and keep this in mind while editing. Saying, 2920:the page that has been nominated for deletion 8: 4143:from editing Knowledge (XXG). Note that the 4055:Knowledge (XXG) policy on original synthesis 2341:It is your analysis that "Butters' possible 2182:The thing about wikipedia is that it offers 845:I removed your cite as a superior cite that 803:No, I don't understand your tone or intent. 2421:Ah, in other words what RedPen said above! 1890:Quoting the article (I assume) you've read: 2707:according to the reverts you have made on 406:for all of your information. Thank you. ≈ 2790:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 2703:You currently appear to be engaged in an 2991:Which is why I removed the rape comment 2805:Article Manipulation and Editing Control 799:Re: Abuse on my talk page and your edits 4310:This is an automatic notification by a 4046:Please respond to the questions on the 3314:I don't revert, I add and get reverted! 2586:replaced it with a more appropriate one 2160:for the moment I guess they're ok too. 166:Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question 4068:word, your edit doesn't make clear. -- 3311:This is the very essence of my claim: 972:where you can sort out the issue in a 941:As you can see, I'm sick and tired of 7: 3402:List of fictional South Park species 2779:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 2732:among editors. If necessary, pursue 2807:", I have no idea what that means. 424:If you add something to wikipedia, 76:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 1587:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution 760:Offensive comments on my talk page 133:Getting more Knowledge (XXG) rules 14: 4363:review the candidates' statements 3066:Knowledge (XXG)'s blocking policy 2582:remove the template, as you imply 1362:Knowledge (XXG)'s blocking policy 868:and in particular the content on 3890:My funeral? Please elaborate... 3832:The best advice I can give you: 3624: 3568: 3426:to the appropriate policy, stop 2774:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy 2698: 2649: 1181:{{cite web|url=URL|title=TITLE}} 908:About Last Night... (South Park) 532:I've reverted edits you made to 389: 3904:Not on wiki. Sorry. Good luck. 3747:Reverting edits to my userspace 3633:: Please see Knowledge (XXG)'s 3577:: Please see Knowledge (XXG)'s 3474:, is it or is it not a policy? 2784:This is an automated notice by 2760:Image:Valcanite Anal Douche.JPG 2658:: Please see Knowledge (XXG)'s 2362:Southparkstudios.com video tags 2109:How am I being not civil here ( 1370:Clubhouses (South Park episode) 534:Clubhouses (South Park episode) 4369:. For the Election committee, 4339:Arbitration Committee election 4330:ArbCom elections are now open! 4139:. If you continue, you may be 3934:2008-2009 Israel-Gaza conflict 2966:to see him get blocked again. 2367:they're added by the writers? 2102:OK, first of all, remember to 1625:the talk page and discuss it. 656: 619:07:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 599:17:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 584:15:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 569:12:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 550:18:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 4379:13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 3726:14:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 3619:00:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 3561:22:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 3543:22:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 3527:22:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 3504:00:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 3484:22:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 3458:22:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 3440:22:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 3417:22:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 3395:21:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 3376:21:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 3350:07:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 3327:13:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 3303:12:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 3287:23:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 3242:12:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 3213:08:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 3108:18:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 3074:discuss controversial changes 3060:from editing for a period of 3042:17:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 3014:01:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 2803:Just like the accusation of " 2637:22:58, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2616:22:51, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2601:22:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2545:13:35, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 2530:11:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 2499:10:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 2456:18:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 2431:18:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 2416:18:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 2377:18:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 2356:20:22, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 2336:18:21, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 2310:22:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2281:19:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2250:16:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2228:09:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2196:18:39, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 2149:22:29, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2131:19:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2098:08:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2079:or the newspaper headline in 2042:10:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 2013:23:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1986:23:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1971:22:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1952:22:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1929:19:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1886:16:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1871:10:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1828:23:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1802:10:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1788:10:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1763:10:30, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1748:22:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1734:09:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1705:23:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1680:03:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 1650:14:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1636:14:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1620:13:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1605:13:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1534:13:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1506:13:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1404:13:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1388:by adding the text {{unblock| 1374:discuss controversial changes 1356:from editing for a period of 1334:11:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1311:00:06, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 1286:23:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1261:23:22, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1227:23:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1193:23:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1175:23:03, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1153:21:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1125:20:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1075:10:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1061:23:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 1049:22:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 1021:15:46, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 1003:21:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 987:19:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 960:19:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 936:19:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 882:19:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 866:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 860:14:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 835:09:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 819:09:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 793:09:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 774:09:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 750:10:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 727:09:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 710:08:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 48: 20: 3072:. Please be more careful to 2976:02:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 2949:06:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 2858:21:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 2817:22:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 2794:07:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 2749:14:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2687:14:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2470:. You might want to consult 2392:12:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2322:In response to your comment 2111:miserably fail to understand 1372:. Please be more careful to 1231:It's a language - just like 691:00:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 673:19:18, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 652:13:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 637:01:53, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 375:21:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 343:20:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 315:20:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 282:20:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 91:How to write a great article 4365:and submit your choices on 4284:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 4280:Trapper Keeper (South Park) 4278:. The nominated article is 4262:Trapper Keeper (South Park) 4086:2009 Hamas reprisal attacks 4080:2009 Hamas reprisal attacks 3629:Regarding your comments on 3573:Regarding your comments on 3127:, who declined the request. 3080:rather than engaging in an 2654:Regarding your comments on 2518:putting them together is OK 2060:comment added by ] (] • ]) 1850:comment added by ] (] • ]) 1718:comment added by ] (] • ]) 1420:, who declined the request. 1380:rather than engaging in an 1096:MichaelQSchmidt's talk page 518:19:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 485:09:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 461:08:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 438:07:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 415:23:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC) 100:Getting your info out there 4394: 4371:MediaWiki message delivery 4252:13:45, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 4206:23:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 4192:editors, as you indicated 4183:10:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 4168:10:39, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 4117:00:09, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 4097:22:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4075:14:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 4028:23:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 4014:22:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 4000:22:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 3985:22:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 3975:together separate topics. 3962:22:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 3946:22:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 3914:01:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3900:12:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 3886:12:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 3850:13:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 3820:19:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 3792:11:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 3769:09:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 3706:09:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 3678:18:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 3663:01:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 2836:Two other points as ever, 39:Best of luck. Have fun! -- 4324:01:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 4297:with four tildes (~~~~). 3741:19:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 3252:guide to appealing blocks 2877:A tag has been placed on 1544:guide to appealing blocks 1011:? I await your response. 4178: 4112: 4009: 3957: 3895: 3701: 3631:Fantastic Easter Special 3538: 3479: 3435: 3390: 3322: 3208: 2997:look closely at the edit 2611: 2525: 2276: 2223: 2162:However, something like 2126: 2093: 2008: 1966: 1924: 1866: 1797: 1758: 1729: 1645: 1615: 1571:Blocking Admin's Comment 1501: 1306: 1256: 1188: 955: 830: 788: 781:Rainforest Schmainforest 658:Starvin' Marvin in Space 564: 509:for more information. ≈ 66:Knowledge (XXG) Tutorial 3688:Oh, and another thing: 3645:for disruption. Please 2848:material to wikipedia. 2670:for disruption. Please 2514:Denial of the Holodomor 2485:Denial of the Holodomor 2201:CCInsider is a part of 1816:disseminate information 1029:IMDB and Southparkstuff 447:cites an episode guide 222:Pages needing attention 4271: 4132: 3575:User talk:Alastairward 3383:the relevant talk page 3120: 3052: 2874: 2656:User:NotAnotherAliGFan 2555:Me, Myself & Irene 2479:, because that policy 2437:The burden of evidence 2176:IMDB as well, even if 2172:self published sources 1413: 1348: 1092: 919:revert them repeatedly 841:About last night, cite 4343:Arbitration Committee 4302:articles for deletion 4270: 4130: 3172:change block settings 3119: 3051: 2954:Just out of curiosity 2873: 2822:Bold, Revert, Discuss 2758:Thanks for uploading 2645:Your personal attacks 2508:- it falls under the 2047: 1465:change block settings 1412: 1347: 1243:in Russian" next to " 1091: 915:controversial changes 420:Verifying information 114:Neutral Point of View 4293:. Please be sure to 4089:William M. Connolley 3692:Yeah, he sure likes 3098:Deacon of Pndapetzim 2489:Deacon of Pndapetzim 2466:fights is involving 1595:Deacon of Pndapetzim 1394:Deacon of Pndapetzim 4347:arbitration process 3796:AliGFan, I noticed 3637:policy. Comment on 3635:no personal attacks 3581:policy. Comment on 3579:no personal attacks 3094:|Your reason here}} 3088:by adding the text 3064:in accordance with 2863:Speedy deletion of 2720:. If you continue, 2662:policy. Comment on 2660:no personal attacks 2620:Don't. Please read 2461:Re:The Ungroundable 2352:The Red Pen of Doom 2332:The Red Pen of Doom 1360:in accordance with 696:About Last Night... 538:Prehistoric Ice Man 204:Conflict resolution 4359:arbitration policy 4295:sign your comments 4272: 4240:- so "D", please. 4133: 3864:It is your funeral 3599:I already told him 3470:That is correct - 3121: 3078:dispute resolution 3068:for violating the 3053: 2891:fair use rationale 2885:, because it is a 2875: 2734:dispute resolution 2398:Episode continuity 1996:within the article 1577:, did not violate 1414: 1378:dispute resolution 1364:for violating the 1349: 1295:- the translation 1103:remove this notice 1093: 978:dispute resolution 394:Please do not add 86:Be bold in editing 71:How to edit a page 4175:NotAnotherAliGFan 4153:three-revert rule 4145:three-revert rule 4109:NotAnotherAliGFan 4006:NotAnotherAliGFan 3954:NotAnotherAliGFan 3892:NotAnotherAliGFan 3698:NotAnotherAliGFan 3535:NotAnotherAliGFan 3476:NotAnotherAliGFan 3432:NotAnotherAliGFan 3387:NotAnotherAliGFan 3381:I've answered on 3319:NotAnotherAliGFan 3240: 3205:NotAnotherAliGFan 3136:NotAnotherAliGFan 3105: 3086:contest the block 3070:three-revert rule 2879:Image:Crapton.jpg 2865:Image:Crapton.jpg 2718:three-revert rule 2713:three-revert rule 2633: 2608:NotAnotherAliGFan 2597: 2522:NotAnotherAliGFan 2496: 2273:NotAnotherAliGFan 2220:NotAnotherAliGFan 2178:(as of this week) 2123:NotAnotherAliGFan 2090:NotAnotherAliGFan 2062: 2005:NotAnotherAliGFan 1963:NotAnotherAliGFan 1921:NotAnotherAliGFan 1863:NotAnotherAliGFan 1852: 1794:NotAnotherAliGFan 1755:NotAnotherAliGFan 1726:NotAnotherAliGFan 1720: 1642:NotAnotherAliGFan 1634: 1612:NotAnotherAliGFan 1602: 1575:User:Alastairward 1532: 1498:NotAnotherAliGFan 1429:NotAnotherAliGFan 1401: 1386:contest the block 1366:three-revert rule 1303:NotAnotherAliGFan 1253:NotAnotherAliGFan 1185:NotAnotherAliGFan 952:NotAnotherAliGFan 827:NotAnotherAliGFan 785:NotAnotherAliGFan 561:NotAnotherAliGFan 513:The Haunted Angel 410:The Haunted Angel 396:original research 345: 331:NotAnotherAliGFan 329:comment added by 284: 270:NotAnotherAliGFan 268:comment added by 252: 251: 248: 247: 244: 243: 213:Getting technical 149: 148: 109:Cite your sources 47: 46: 31:NotAnotherAliGFan 4385: 4249: 4244: 4072: 3928:Reprisal Attacks 3825:solicited advice 3774:Disruptive edits 3628: 3572: 3265: 3259: 3239: 3237: 3230: 3191: 3189: 3178: 3160: 3158:deleted contribs 3118: 3101: 3095: 2935:Mister Senseless 2915: 2914: 2908: 2741: 2711:. Note that the 2709:The Ungroundable 2702: 2679: 2653: 2631: 2595: 2579: 2575:Comedy-film-stub 2573: 2569: 2563: 2492: 2353: 2333: 2317:The Ungroundable 2115:don't understand 2061: 2054: 1851: 1844: 1719: 1712: 1695: 1630: 1598: 1557: 1551: 1528: 1484: 1482: 1471: 1453: 1451:deleted contribs 1411: 1397: 1390:your reason here 1319:Uncited material 1133: 1132: 1106: 1058: 984: 933: 928: 925:your reason here 898:for a period of 514: 411: 402:. Please cite a 393: 371: 370: 367: 364: 361: 358: 324: 311: 310: 307: 304: 301: 298: 263: 153: 53: 49: 32: 25: 21: 4393: 4392: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4367:the voting page 4333: 4265: 4247: 4242: 4222: 4125: 4082: 4070: 4044: 3930: 3827: 3776: 3755:userspace. See 3749: 3714: 3515: 3472:WP:Common Sense 3405: 3364: 3271: 3263: 3257: 3256:, then use the 3245: 3233: 3231: 3216: 3179: 3169: 3155: 3138: 3131:blocking policy 3116: 3110: 3089: 2983: 2968:Another-anomaly 2956: 2912: 2906: 2905: 2893:uploaded after 2868: 2842:burden of proof 2824: 2801: 2756: 2739: 2696: 2677: 2647: 2577: 2571: 2567: 2561: 2558: 2463: 2439: 2400: 2364: 2351: 2331: 2320: 2157: 2055: 2050: 1845: 1836: 1713: 1693: 1687: 1672:Anthony cargile 1585:and especially 1583:WP:Edit warring 1563: 1555: 1549: 1548:, then use the 1537: 1509: 1472: 1462: 1448: 1431: 1424:blocking policy 1409: 1406: 1341: 1321: 1215:synth territory 1210:an edit summary 1112: 1107: 1100: 1085: 1056: 1031: 982: 931: 922: 890: 843: 801: 762: 698: 661: 629:Anthony cargile 530: 512: 443:The article on 422: 409: 404:reliable source 387: 368: 365: 362: 359: 356: 355: 308: 305: 302: 299: 296: 295: 259: 256:Seth MacFarlane 214: 199:Sign your posts 181: 158: 134: 101: 81:Manual of Style 58: 57:Getting Started 43: 30: 19: 12: 11: 5: 4391: 4389: 4336: 4332: 4327: 4264: 4260:nomination of 4255: 4221: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4186: 4185: 4124: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4104: 4103: 4081: 4078: 4043: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 3929: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3874: 3870: 3867: 3839: 3838: 3826: 3823: 3775: 3772: 3748: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3713: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3685: 3684: 3666: 3665: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3546: 3545: 3514: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3443: 3442: 3404: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3363: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3306: 3305: 3246: 3223: 3219:Decline reason 3200: 3196:Request reason 3193: 3114: 3054:You have been 3046: 3045: 3044: 2982: 2979: 2955: 2952: 2889:image with no 2867: 2861: 2844:on the editor 2823: 2820: 2800: 2797: 2782: 2781: 2776: 2755: 2752: 2695: 2690: 2646: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2557: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2462: 2459: 2438: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2399: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2363: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2325:, please read 2319: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2298: 2294: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2259: 2238: 2234: 2215: 2203:Comedy Central 2181: 2175: 2161: 2156: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2073:Stoopid Monkey 2049: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2025: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1907: 1900: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1835: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1776: 1768: 1710: 1708: 1707: 1686: 1683: 1665: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1538: 1516: 1512:Decline reason 1493: 1489:Request reason 1486: 1407: 1350:You have been 1342: 1340: 1337: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1206: 1163: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1111: 1108: 1099: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1030: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 991: 990: 989: 892:You have been 889: 886: 885: 884: 842: 839: 838: 837: 800: 797: 796: 795: 761: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 732: 731: 730: 729: 697: 694: 660: 655: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 555:I've answered 529: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 490: 489: 488: 487: 467: 421: 418: 386: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 258: 253: 250: 249: 246: 245: 242: 241: 240: 239: 234: 229: 224: 216: 215: 212: 209: 208: 207: 206: 201: 196: 191: 183: 182: 179: 176: 175: 174: 173: 168: 160: 159: 156: 150: 147: 146: 145: 144: 142:Policy Library 136: 135: 132: 129: 128: 127: 126: 121: 116: 111: 103: 102: 99: 96: 95: 94: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 60: 59: 56: 45: 44: 38: 28: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4390: 4381: 4380: 4376: 4372: 4368: 4364: 4360: 4356: 4352: 4348: 4344: 4340: 4331: 4328: 4326: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4303: 4298: 4296: 4292: 4287: 4285: 4281: 4277: 4269: 4263: 4259: 4256: 4254: 4253: 4250: 4245: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4227: 4220: 4216: 4213: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4184: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4165: 4161: 4156: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4129: 4122: 4118: 4114: 4110: 4106: 4105: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4087: 4079: 4077: 4076: 4073: 4067: 4063: 4058: 4056: 4053: 4049: 4041: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4011: 4007: 4003: 4002: 4001: 3997: 3993: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3982: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3959: 3955: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3927: 3915: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3868: 3865: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3847: 3843: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3830: 3824: 3822: 3821: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3804: 3799: 3794: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3781: 3773: 3771: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3718:68.79.120.124 3711: 3707: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3686: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3664: 3660: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3627: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3571: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3512: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3492: 3485: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3403: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3373: 3369: 3362: 3359: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3315: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3270: 3269: 3262: 3255: 3253: 3244: 3243: 3238: 3236: 3228: 3222: 3220: 3215: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3199: 3197: 3192: 3187: 3183: 3177: 3173: 3168: 3164: 3159: 3154: 3150: 3149:global blocks 3146: 3145:active blocks 3142: 3137: 3132: 3128: 3126: 3125:administrator 3113: 3109: 3104: 3099: 3093: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3058: 3050: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3004:change this. 3002: 3001:summarization 2998: 2994: 2990: 2989: 2980: 2978: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2960: 2953: 2951: 2950: 2946: 2945:Contributions 2942: 2938: 2936: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2921: 2911: 2902: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2872: 2866: 2862: 2860: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2834: 2831: 2829: 2821: 2819: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2798: 2796: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2780: 2777: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2767: 2765: 2764:copyright tag 2761: 2753: 2751: 2750: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2742: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2725: 2719: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2701: 2694: 2691: 2689: 2688: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2680: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2652: 2644: 2638: 2635: 2634: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2599: 2598: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2576: 2566: 2556: 2552: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2495: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2473: 2469: 2468:this addition 2460: 2458: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2361: 2357: 2354: 2348: 2344: 2343:homosexuality 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2334: 2328: 2324: 2318: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2292: 2288: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2265: 2260: 2256: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2216: 2213: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2184:verifiability 2179: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2107: 2105: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2086: 2082: 2081:American Dad! 2078: 2077:Robot Chicken 2075:'s antics in 2074: 2070: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2048:Kenny's Death 2043: 2039: 2035: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1959: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1940: 1936: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1906: 1905: 1901: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1849: 1842: 1834:Jabba The Hut 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1774: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1717: 1706: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1628: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1601: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1562: 1561: 1554: 1547: 1545: 1536: 1535: 1531: 1526: 1522: 1515: 1513: 1508: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1492: 1490: 1485: 1480: 1476: 1470: 1466: 1461: 1457: 1452: 1447: 1443: 1442:global blocks 1439: 1438:active blocks 1435: 1430: 1425: 1421: 1419: 1418:administrator 1405: 1400: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1346: 1339:November 2008 1338: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1318: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1294: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1274: 1270: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1247:looks like a 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1211: 1207: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1141: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1109: 1104: 1097: 1090: 1082: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1059: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1037: 1034: 1028: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 985: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 962: 961: 957: 953: 948: 944: 940: 939: 938: 937: 934: 926: 920: 916: 914: 909: 905: 901: 897: 896: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 867: 864: 863: 862: 861: 857: 853: 848: 840: 836: 832: 828: 823: 822: 821: 820: 816: 812: 807: 804: 798: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 777: 776: 775: 771: 767: 759: 751: 747: 743: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 728: 724: 720: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 707: 703: 695: 693: 692: 688: 684: 680: 679:Verifiability 675: 674: 670: 666: 659: 654: 653: 649: 645: 639: 638: 634: 630: 626: 621: 620: 616: 612: 600: 596: 592: 587: 586: 585: 581: 577: 572: 571: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 553: 552: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 527: 519: 516: 515: 508: 504: 500: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 486: 482: 478: 474: 473: 468: 464: 463: 462: 458: 454: 449: 446: 445:Stanley's Cup 442: 441: 440: 439: 435: 431: 427: 419: 417: 416: 413: 412: 405: 401: 400:Stanley's Cup 397: 392: 384: 376: 373: 372: 351: 347: 346: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 322: 318: 317: 316: 313: 312: 291: 287: 286: 285: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 257: 254: 238: 235: 233: 230: 228: 225: 223: 220: 219: 218: 217: 211: 210: 205: 202: 200: 197: 195: 192: 190: 187: 186: 185: 184: 180:Getting along 178: 177: 172: 169: 167: 164: 163: 162: 161: 155: 154: 151: 143: 140: 139: 138: 137: 131: 130: 125: 124:Verifiability 122: 120: 119:Point of View 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 106: 105: 104: 98: 97: 92: 89: 87: 84: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 62: 61: 55: 54: 51: 50: 42: 36: 27: 26: 23: 22: 16: 4334: 4308:Please note: 4307: 4306: 4299: 4288: 4273: 4223: 4160:Alastairward 4157: 4149:edit warring 4134: 4083: 4071:Escape Orbit 4065: 4059: 4051: 4045: 3931: 3858: 3840: 3831: 3828: 3807: 3801: 3795: 3784:Alastairward 3777: 3761:Alastairward 3752: 3750: 3715: 3712:Alastairward 3694:playing dumb 3689: 3667: 3638: 3603:he confirmed 3582: 3567: 3553:Alastairward 3519:Alastairward 3516: 3496:Alastairward 3450:Alastairward 3428:playing dumb 3423: 3422:I've linked 3409:Alastairward 3406: 3365: 3313: 3312: 3295:Alastairward 3272: 3267: 3249: 3247: 3234: 3226: 3224: 3218: 3217: 3201: 3195: 3194: 3167:creation log 3134: 3122: 3111: 3061: 3055: 3029: 3000: 2992: 2985: 2984: 2963: 2961: 2957: 2933: 2928: 2924: 2917: 2903: 2876: 2850:Alastairward 2845: 2835: 2832: 2825: 2809:Alastairward 2802: 2783: 2768: 2757: 2744: 2737: 2726:from editing 2721: 2697: 2682: 2675: 2663: 2648: 2629: 2593: 2580:). I didn't 2559: 2537:Alastairward 2480: 2464: 2448:Alastairward 2440: 2423:Alastairward 2408:Alastairward 2401: 2384:Alastairward 2369:Alastairward 2365: 2346: 2321: 2302:Alastairward 2291:WP:DEMOCRACY 2263: 2262: 2242:Alastairward 2211: 2188:Alastairward 2158: 2141:Alastairward 2118: 2114: 2110: 2084: 2069:The Simpsons 2051: 2034:Alastairward 1999: 1995: 1992:playing dumb 1978:Alastairward 1957: 1944:Alastairward 1938: 1910: 1909: 1903: 1902: 1896: 1895: 1878:Alastairward 1837: 1820:Alastairward 1780:Alastairward 1772: 1740:Alastairward 1709: 1700: 1698: 1691: 1664: 1627:UltraExactZZ 1590: 1570: 1559: 1541: 1539: 1525:UltraExactZZ 1517: 1511: 1510: 1494: 1488: 1487: 1460:creation log 1427: 1415: 1389: 1357: 1351: 1326:Alastairward 1322: 1297: 1296: 1292: 1278:Alastairward 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1219:Alastairward 1208:You said in 1180: 1167:Alastairward 1145:Alastairward 1117:Alastairward 1113: 1067:Alastairward 1041:Alastairward 1038: 1035: 1032: 1013:Alastairward 995:Alastairward 966:edit warring 924: 911: 904:edit warring 899: 893: 891: 874:Alastairward 852:Alastairward 846: 844: 811:Alastairward 808: 805: 802: 766:Alastairward 763: 742:Alastairward 719:Alastairward 702:Alastairward 699: 676: 665:Alastairward 662: 644:Alastairward 640: 624: 622: 611:Alastairward 607: 591:Alastairward 576:Alastairward 542:Alastairward 531: 511: 477:Alastairward 470: 453:Alastairward 430:Alastairward 425: 423: 408: 388: 354: 334: 320: 294: 273: 260: 237:Village pump 157:Getting Help 4198:Nightscream 3812:Nightscream 3670:Nightscream 3655:Nightscream 3611:Nightscream 3595:WP:Civility 3513:and threats 3342:Nightscream 3279:Nightscream 3034:Nightscream 3028:, as it is 3022:WP:Fancruft 3006:Nightscream 2918:the top of 2722:you may be 2056:—Preceding 1846:—Preceding 1714:—Preceding 1591:Negotiation 683:Nightscream 528:At it again 385:August 2008 325:—Preceding 264:—Preceding 227:Peer review 41:ElectricEye 4355:topic bans 4316:Erwin85Bot 4219:South Park 4158:Got cite? 3757:exceptions 3285:) Thanks. 3235:Sandstein 3163:filter log 2993:altogether 2510:exceptions 2207:South Park 2155:References 1456:filter log 1392:}} below. 1203:verifiable 923:{{unblock| 466:have done. 189:Wikiquette 4351:site bans 4234:Talk:Bono 4226:consensus 4062:talk page 4048:talk page 3803:Consensus 3798:this edit 3647:stay cool 3587:stay cool 3250:read the 3229:conduct. 3182:checkuser 3141:block log 3026:WP:Trivia 2786:OrphanBot 2730:consensus 2672:stay cool 2506:WP:TRIVIA 2472:WP:TRIVIA 2164:ccinsider 1542:read the 1475:checkuser 1434:block log 970:talk page 232:Utilities 171:Help Desk 4276:deletion 4042:Red hair 4020:Nableezy 3992:Nableezy 3977:Nableezy 3973:WP:SYNTH 3938:Nableezy 3733:Stijndon 3511:WP:CIVIL 3368:HighKing 3361:Red hair 3153:contribs 3082:edit war 3076:or seek 3062:72 hours 2981:Pandemic 2887:non-free 2838:be civil 2705:edit war 2626:Grutness 2590:Grutness 2444:prove it 2404:WP:SYNTH 2104:be civil 2058:unsigned 1848:unsigned 1841:WP:SYNTH 1716:unsigned 1694:Schmidt, 1632:Evidence 1530:Evidence 1446:contribs 1382:edit war 1376:or seek 1358:48 hours 1140:WP:SYNTH 1101:You can 1057:Tiptoety 983:Tiptoety 932:Tiptoety 900:24 hours 847:actually 350:see this 339:contribs 327:unsigned 278:contribs 266:unsigned 194:Civility 4243:Rodhull 4141:blocked 4137:Towelie 4131:Warning 4123:Towelie 3639:content 3583:content 3261:unblock 3176:unblock 3096:below. 3092:unblock 3057:blocked 2724:blocked 2664:content 2622:WP:STUB 2027:As the 1939:related 1553:unblock 1469:unblock 1353:blocked 1083:Message 929:below. 913:discuss 895:blocked 888:Blocked 870:sources 499:WP:CITE 35:welcome 17:Welcome 4341:. The 4248:andemu 4238:WP:BRD 4230:Policy 3643:blocks 3607:blocks 3020:under 2929:speedy 2910:hangon 2846:adding 2826:Check 2693:WP:3RR 2668:blocks 2327:WP:SYN 2269:Gawker 2255:Google 2168:gawker 2071:, the 2029:burden 1976:this. 1685:Issues 1579:WP:3RR 1239:means 1199:burden 29:Hello 4066:Which 3969:WP:OR 3424:twice 3254:first 2941:Speak 2895:May 4 2477:WP:OR 2329:. -- 2297:fact. 2237:show? 1546:first 1245:Jabba 1237:Jabba 1183:tag. 1162:toad? 1110:Jabba 974:civil 625:cited 503:WP:OR 4375:talk 4320:talk 4286:"). 4217:and 4215:Bono 4202:talk 4194:here 4179:talk 4164:talk 4113:talk 4093:talk 4052:read 4024:talk 4010:talk 3996:talk 3981:talk 3958:talk 3942:talk 3910:talk 3906:Ikip 3896:talk 3882:talk 3878:Ikip 3857:RE: 3846:talk 3842:Ikip 3816:talk 3808:many 3788:talk 3765:talk 3737:talk 3722:talk 3702:talk 3696:... 3674:talk 3659:talk 3651:Diff 3615:talk 3557:talk 3539:talk 3523:talk 3500:talk 3480:talk 3454:talk 3436:talk 3413:talk 3391:talk 3372:talk 3346:talk 3323:talk 3299:talk 3283:talk 3275:here 3227:your 3209:talk 3103:Talk 3038:talk 3024:and 3010:talk 2972:talk 2964:hate 2899:2006 2854:talk 2828:this 2813:talk 2740:Grsz 2678:Grsz 2632:wha? 2612:talk 2596:wha? 2584:- I 2565:stub 2553:Re: 2541:talk 2526:talk 2494:Talk 2452:talk 2427:talk 2412:talk 2388:talk 2373:talk 2306:talk 2277:talk 2246:talk 2233:use? 2224:talk 2192:talk 2145:talk 2127:talk 2094:talk 2085:some 2038:talk 2009:talk 1982:talk 1967:talk 1948:talk 1925:talk 1882:talk 1867:talk 1859:this 1824:talk 1798:talk 1784:talk 1773:That 1759:talk 1744:talk 1730:talk 1676:talk 1646:talk 1616:talk 1600:Talk 1521:here 1502:talk 1399:Talk 1330:talk 1307:talk 1282:talk 1257:talk 1249:toad 1241:toad 1223:talk 1189:talk 1171:talk 1149:talk 1121:talk 1071:talk 1045:talk 1017:talk 1009:here 999:talk 956:talk 947:this 902:for 878:talk 856:talk 831:talk 815:talk 789:talk 770:talk 746:talk 723:talk 706:talk 687:talk 669:talk 648:talk 633:talk 615:talk 595:talk 580:talk 565:talk 557:here 546:talk 536:and 507:WP:V 505:and 481:talk 472:here 457:talk 434:talk 335:talk 274:talk 4335:Hi, 4312:bot 4258:AfD 3971:to 3186:log 3133:). 3112:. 3030:not 2916:to 2736:. 2628:... 2592:... 2347:non 2212:any 2166:or 2119:all 1593:). 1479:log 1426:). 1368:at 943:him 906:on 426:you 4377:) 4353:, 4322:) 4204:) 4181:) 4166:) 4115:) 4095:) 4026:) 4012:) 3998:) 3983:) 3960:) 3944:) 3912:) 3898:) 3884:) 3848:) 3818:) 3790:) 3767:) 3753:my 3739:) 3724:) 3704:) 3676:) 3661:) 3653:) 3617:) 3559:) 3541:) 3525:) 3502:) 3482:) 3456:) 3438:) 3430:. 3415:) 3393:) 3385:. 3374:) 3348:) 3325:) 3301:) 3277:. 3264:}} 3258:{{ 3221:: 3211:) 3198:: 3180:• 3174:• 3170:• 3165:• 3161:• 3156:• 3151:• 3147:• 3143:• 3106:) 3090:{{ 3040:) 3012:) 2974:) 2947:) 2943:- 2913:}} 2907:{{ 2897:, 2856:) 2815:) 2792:. 2614:) 2578:}} 2572:{{ 2568:}} 2562:{{ 2543:) 2528:) 2520:. 2497:) 2454:) 2446:! 2429:) 2414:) 2406:. 2390:) 2375:) 2308:) 2279:) 2248:) 2226:) 2194:) 2147:) 2129:) 2096:) 2040:) 2011:) 2000:is 1984:) 1969:) 1950:) 1927:) 1884:) 1869:) 1843:. 1826:) 1800:) 1786:) 1761:) 1746:) 1732:) 1678:) 1648:) 1618:) 1603:) 1556:}} 1550:{{ 1514:: 1504:) 1491:: 1473:• 1467:• 1463:• 1458:• 1454:• 1449:• 1444:• 1440:• 1436:• 1402:) 1332:) 1309:) 1298:is 1284:) 1259:) 1225:) 1191:) 1173:) 1151:) 1123:) 1073:) 1047:) 1019:) 1001:) 980:. 958:) 927:}} 880:) 858:) 833:) 817:) 791:) 772:) 748:) 725:) 708:) 689:) 671:) 650:) 635:) 617:) 597:) 582:) 567:) 559:. 548:) 501:, 483:) 475:. 459:) 436:) 366:nd 360:ir 341:) 337:• 306:nd 300:ir 280:) 276:• 33:! 4373:( 4318:( 4200:( 4177:( 4162:( 4111:( 4091:( 4022:( 4008:( 3994:( 3979:( 3956:( 3940:( 3908:( 3894:( 3880:( 3866:. 3844:( 3814:( 3786:( 3763:( 3735:( 3720:( 3700:( 3672:( 3657:( 3613:( 3555:( 3537:( 3521:( 3498:( 3478:( 3452:( 3434:( 3411:( 3389:( 3370:( 3344:( 3321:( 3297:( 3281:( 3207:( 3190:) 3188:) 3184:( 3139:( 3100:( 3036:( 3008:( 2986:" 2970:( 2939:( 2937:™ 2925:] 2852:( 2811:( 2610:( 2539:( 2524:( 2491:( 2450:( 2425:( 2410:( 2386:( 2371:( 2304:( 2275:( 2244:( 2222:( 2190:( 2143:( 2125:( 2113:= 2092:( 2036:( 2007:( 1980:( 1965:( 1946:( 1923:( 1880:( 1865:( 1822:( 1796:( 1782:( 1757:( 1742:( 1728:( 1674:( 1644:( 1629:~ 1614:( 1597:( 1527:~ 1500:( 1483:) 1481:) 1477:( 1432:( 1396:( 1328:( 1305:( 1280:( 1255:( 1221:( 1187:( 1169:( 1147:( 1119:( 1098:. 1069:( 1043:( 1015:( 997:( 954:( 876:( 854:( 829:( 813:( 787:( 768:( 744:( 721:( 704:( 685:( 667:( 646:( 631:( 613:( 593:( 578:( 563:( 544:( 479:( 455:( 432:( 369:a 363:a 357:m 333:( 309:a 303:a 297:m 272:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index