Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Ocyril

Source 📝

173:
then it's just personal POV and SYNTHESIS. And then removing stuff you personally don't like or have problems with. You act as if this "Constantine formalized or legalized the Christianity of the time" is some concocted view of some past Knowledge (XXG) editor...when it's not. Your position is what needs to be sourced and proven. Knowledge (XXG) does NOT care waht is "true", only if something is SOURCED. And the view that Constantine did in fact issue an "edict" in 313 A.D., etc etc, is the sourced and established view.
190:
you really are correct), but your personal view on the "edict" (and even discounting it as even being an "edict") are NOT what are to guide your editing decisions, in true NPOV and referenced manner. Constantine legalized "Christianity" at the time, by DE-CRIMINALIZING it, and where it was NOT an arrestable offense to be a "Christian". What exactly is the big problem?
148:). If there is currently some "questionable accuracy". it was because that source is a bit tricky to figure out. Besides, there is no point to create a straight duplicate of a Wikisource article in Knowledge (XXG) - meanwhile, a pointer to the Wikisource article would be better until a more structured biography can be developed, with various other 189:
So again, your constant removing and deleting of sentences you don't like or don't agree with is against WP policy if the sentences you are removing are established and sourced views and positions. You can have personal disagreements (and even be correct theoretically, though in this I do NOT think
172:
hello. I understand what you're saying in a sense, but the problem is that the current established and SOURCED view and position is that Constantine "legalized" the Christianity of the time. You can disagree with that view or conclusion all you want, but if you don't have sources for your own view,
185:
are indeed true. And the phrase "newly recognized catholic church" is NOT necessarily referring to the "Gallienus" part of it, but the Constantine aspect of it. So? What's the big problem? It was "newly recognized" around the time of Constantine. Who doesn't know that fact?
180:
After Emperor Gallienus and later Emperor Licinius and Emperor Constantine legalized and formalized the Christianity of the time in the Roman Empire, the newly recognized catholic Church sought to unify and clarify its
140:). The content as it was would likely be confusing to readers without some explanation (or at least linking) of the issues and background, presented in an encyclopedic structure (see 113:
I removed your proposed deletion tag, because this was a notable person. Inaccuracies in the article should be fixed though the normal editing process.
47: 52: 43: 26: 62: 56: 128:
The verbatim copy from Wikisource did not resemble a Knowledge (XXG) article, since it needed proper formatting (
33: 22: 69: 73: 195: 85: 77: 38: 97: 141: 107: 29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 84:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 191: 118: 133: 157: 129: 93: 149: 137: 114: 132:) and a single source presents article neutrality and sufficient sourcing issues ( 153: 88:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place 145: 199: 161: 122: 101: 81: 8: 68:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 92:before the question. Again, welcome! - 7: 34:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for 14: 53:How to create your first article 200:23:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 1: 162:01:12, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 123:23:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC) 215: 102:17:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 86:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 48:How to develop articles 152:included for support. 21:Hello, Ocyril, and 108:George of Laodicea 44:How to edit a page 27:your contributions 168:edits...and views 76:your messages on 206: 91: 78:discussion pages 214: 213: 209: 208: 207: 205: 204: 203: 170: 111: 89: 63:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 212: 210: 169: 166: 165: 164: 110: 105: 66: 65: 60: 57:Article Wizard 50: 41: 36: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 211: 202: 201: 197: 193: 187: 183: 182: 177: 174: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 126: 125: 124: 120: 116: 109: 106: 104: 103: 99: 95: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 64: 61: 58: 54: 51: 49: 45: 42: 40: 37: 35: 32: 31: 30: 28: 24: 19: 18: 192:Gabby Merger 188: 184: 179: 178: 175: 171: 112: 67: 59:if you wish) 20: 16: 15: 176:The words: 90:{{help me}} 80:using four 55:(using the 94:Phoenixrod 70:Wikipedian 181:theology. 142:WP:BETTER 72:! Please 39:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 146:MOS:BIO 134:WP:NPOV 115:Bearian 23:welcome 154:Dl2000 130:WP:MOS 82:tildes 150:WP:RS 196:talk 158:talk 138:WP:V 119:talk 98:talk 74:sign 46:and 198:) 160:) 144:, 136:, 121:) 100:) 194:( 156:( 117:( 96:(

Index

welcome
your contributions
The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Article Wizard
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign
discussion pages
tildes
Knowledge (XXG):Questions
Phoenixrod
talk
17:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
George of Laodicea
Bearian
talk
23:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
WP:MOS
WP:NPOV
WP:V
WP:BETTER
MOS:BIO
WP:RS
Dl2000
talk
01:12, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.