Knowledge

User talk:Ojeda jp

Source 📝

225: 286: 125: 380:, the noticeboard for Philippines-related topics, about a proposed blackout of the English Knowledge in the Philippines in order to protest the passage of RA 10175, similar to the blackout against SOPA and PIPA held earlier this year. I feel that your input on the subject will definitely help in the discussion. 96:, all added material in Knowledge should be verifiable. No source was given from a make-believe "Laguna West Metro." Only NEDA can make nationwide declarations about metropolitan areas unless a provincial government issues such (but it won't be at par with a NEDA-declared metro area anyway). Don't resort to 71:
Also, unless you can prove why you had to revert my edits without sufficient reason, you may be flagged and reported to an administrator for proper intervention. All my edits to the article had corresponding edit summaries. The least you could do is start a section in the Talk page explaining why you
315:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
154:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
433:
experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a
387:, and I hope your input will help the Filipino Knowledge community determine which is the best course of action against this law. Similarly, we hope to get as much input from as many Wikipedians as possible. 33:
for associated styles}. Flagging my edits as vandalism is unfounded, I have only been removing content that do not follow Knowledge policies, most notably
429:
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most
422:
is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group
450: 438: 384: 264: 373: 446: 276: 376:, which was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012. Currently, there is a discussion on the 340: 179: 48:. Before you moved it to "Calamba City", there has already been a consensus as to the article's title as evidenced by a 344: 248: 183: 232: 418:
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the
419: 372:
As a Filipino Wikipedian, I hope you are aware of the passage of Republic Act No. 10175, also known as the
336: 244: 175: 214: 328: 167: 38: 268: 56:
the article as well, as everyone is entitled to edit any article in this encyclopedia. Cheers.
352: 297: 191: 136: 109: 77: 61: 30: 377: 312: 254: 151: 34: 400: 303: 293: 210: 142: 132: 22: 324: 163: 101: 332: 308: 272: 237: 206: 171: 147: 97: 53: 45: 348: 187: 105: 104:
too, as I am bound to find out what other accounts you're using eventually anyway.
93: 73: 57: 26: 29:
when previous discussions have already been done as to the city article name (see
323:
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
320:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 162:
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
159:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 89: 247:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 205:
Hello Ojeda jp. Please see a discussion of your edits that has been opened
100:
as you weaken your argument plus you can get banned as well. Don't use
454: 405: 356: 280: 218: 195: 113: 81: 65: 335:
for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant
174:
for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant
49: 385:
Knowledge talk:Tambayan Philippines#The Cybercrime Prevention Act
311:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 150:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 284: 223: 123: 236:
temporarily from editing for massive and ethnically-based
201:
Complaint about your edits at the edit warring noticeboard
207:
WP:AN3#User:Ojeda jp reported by User:Xeltran (Result: )
437:
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at
240: 445:
and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying.
302:
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
141:
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
383:
Please feel free to participate in the discussion at
343:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 182:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 243:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 44:Kindly check the Move log of the article, as seen 327:to work toward making a version that represents 209:. You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, 166:to work toward making a version that represents 434:dynamic, supportive environment for your work. 318:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 157:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 8: 296:shows that you are currently engaged in an 135:shows that you are currently engaged in an 362:Proposed blackout in protest of RA 10175 251:by adding below this notice the text 7: 420:current system we introduced in 2011 14: 374:Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 307:—especially if you violate the 292:Your recent editing history at 146:—especially if you violate the 131:Your recent editing history at 21:Explain why the sudden move of 1: 455:04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC) 411:New deal for page patrollers 406:09:52, 3 October 2012 (UTC) 470: 447:MediaWiki message delivery 263:, but you should read the 357:06:11, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 265:guide to appealing blocks 245:make useful contributions 281:13:53, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 219:13:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 196:12:41, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 114:12:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 82:11:58, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 66:11:49, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 72:need to undo my edits. 289: 228: 128: 288: 259:Your reason here ~~~~ 227: 127: 304:blocked from editing 143:blocked from editing 392:maraming salamat po 331:among editors. See 170:among editors. See 441:New Page Reviewers 426:has been created. 341:dispute resolution 290: 229: 180:dispute resolution 129: 424:New Page Reviewer 309:three-revert rule 249:appeal this block 148:three-revert rule 461: 287: 262: 238:personal attacks 226: 126: 98:personal attacks 469: 468: 464: 463: 462: 460: 459: 458: 413: 366:Dear Ojeda jp, 364: 345:page protection 294:Calamba, Laguna 285: 283: 252: 224: 203: 184:page protection 133:Calamba, Laguna 124: 122: 52:. Please avoid 23:Calamba, Laguna 19: 17:Calamba, Laguna 12: 11: 5: 467: 465: 412: 409: 397:Kind regards, 390:Thank you and 363: 360: 230:You have been 222: 202: 199: 121: 118: 117: 116: 85: 84: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 466: 457: 456: 452: 448: 444: 443: 442: 435: 432: 427: 425: 421: 416: 415:Hi Ojeda jp, 410: 408: 407: 404: 403: 398: 395: 393: 388: 386: 381: 379: 375: 370: 367: 361: 359: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 321: 319: 314: 310: 306: 305: 299: 295: 282: 278: 275: 274: 270: 266: 260: 256: 250: 246: 242: 239: 235: 234: 221: 220: 216: 212: 208: 200: 198: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 160: 158: 153: 149: 145: 144: 138: 134: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 86: 83: 79: 75: 70: 69: 68: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 42: 40: 36: 32: 28: 24: 16: 440: 439: 436: 430: 428: 423: 417: 414: 401: 399: 396: 391: 389: 382: 371: 368: 365: 322: 317: 301: 291: 271: 258: 231: 204: 161: 156: 140: 130: 50:move request 43: 39:WP:NOTTRAVEL 27:Calamba City 20: 369:Greetings! 337:noticeboard 176:noticeboard 402:Sky Harbor 211:EdJohnston 31:WP:MOSPHIL 329:consensus 325:talk page 168:consensus 164:talk page 120:July 2012 35:WP:NOTDIR 378:Tambayan 339:or seek 316:warring— 298:edit war 273:BWilkins 267:first. ( 257:|reason= 178:or seek 155:warring— 137:edit war 431:current 349:Xeltran 313:reverts 255:unblock 233:blocked 188:Xeltran 152:reverts 106:Xeltran 88:As per 74:Xeltran 58:Xeltran 54:owning 102:socks 94:WP:RS 451:talk 353:talk 241:here 215:talk 192:talk 110:talk 92:and 90:WP:V 78:talk 62:talk 46:here 37:and 347:. 333:BRD 186:. 172:BRD 25:to 453:) 394:! 355:) 300:. 279:) 277:←✎ 269:✉→ 261:}} 253:{{ 217:) 194:) 139:. 112:) 80:) 64:) 41:. 449:( 351:( 213:( 190:( 108:( 76:( 60:(

Index

Calamba, Laguna
Calamba City
WP:MOSPHIL
WP:NOTDIR
WP:NOTTRAVEL
here
move request
owning
Xeltran
talk
11:49, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Xeltran
talk
11:58, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
WP:V
WP:RS
personal attacks
socks
Xeltran
talk
12:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Calamba, Laguna
edit war
blocked from editing
three-revert rule
reverts
talk page
consensus
BRD
noticeboard

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑