474:
505:. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge (XXG)’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Knowledge (XXG) administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
113:
171:
has been declined because the issue has not yet been adequately discussed on the article's talk page. I have pinged the other party in the discussion, so they will hopefully engage with the discussion there. If you are unable to come to an agreement after discussing, you can re-list the issue on the
438:
Hi friend. I just wanted to tell you not to bother trying to add the polygenic scores for IQ to the race an intelligence article, seriously. It is not about the reliability of the journals, and they know it. These polygenic scores are also discussed Bird (2021) in the
American Journal of Physical
333:
The consensus on the talkpage is to keep the current version until new details emerge in the future. NYT journalists do not have the same resources the FBI and Secret
Service have so the NYT investigation is no reason to not follow the consensus. They FBI/USSS figure it out and then we can make a
393:
No, this is a significant change, and against the consensus. A reliable source, the NYT published that the F.B.I. is investigating what exactly hit Trump (bullet or shrapnel or
Vanilla Ice), and now you changed it to say he got shot, which is what we say when he got hit by a bullet and not by
318:
Yes, that is the article I was referring to. The NYT is a reliable source, and the secret service hasn't released anything to the contrary. I also don't think my edit was "significant"; also, that warning message was already there when someone else (a user topic banned from this page btw for
267:
The F.B.I. is examining numerous metal fragments found near the stage at a campaign rally in Butler, Pa., to determine whether an assassin’s bullet — or potential debris — grazed former
President Donald J. Trump’s head, bloodying his ear, according to the F.B.I. and a federal law enforcement
451:
They will not listen to me because I am blocked, but if you could find an admin with some intellectual integrity that can block the ones who we can show intentionally lie about this, that would contribute a lot to bringing back
Knowledge (XXG).
439:
Anthropology, and in Nature, and
Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences and many more journals. You cannot add those to the article either. Look at the last time someone tried to add information on those polygenic scores here.
448:
In other words, those ignorant peasants who read the encyclopedia might interpret this data in a way we do not like, therefore they cannot be shown it. Intellectual dishonesty at its worst.
545:
348:
If the consensus is to keep to the current version, then we should revert back to the version it was on at the time the warning message was added i.e. before the word "at" was added...
245:
536:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics
319:"bludgeoning, NPOV, and disruptive editing" per admin decision) added it; and even if it was significant, I think it's clear that there's consensus on the talk page.
137:
379:
I have no objection to that change, I'm just asking for consistency. My change was also minor and keeping with consensus, including the RFC.
453:
129:
47:
229:
52:
43:
252:
301:
62:
168:
117:
26:
56:
440:
203:, please note that not being unavailable online is not a valid reason to reject a reliable source (as explained at
248:
412:
Well, I am not gonna editwar with you, someone else will, but it sucks that people don't respect the consensus.
208:
33:
22:
457:
445:“it would need to be presented in much more detail than the OP has done in order to avoid facile misreading.”
69:
303:, that is what they did inhouse. The Secret Service is in a far better position to investigate these things.
270:
73:
552:
394:
shrapnel based on
Malachy Brownes investigation and your lack of understanding of the consensus. Oh well.
153:
145:
541:
85:
141:
77:
38:
442:
They’ll just gang up to lie, say it is synthesis and shut you down. And here is the official reason:
417:
399:
370:
339:
308:
291:
277:
133:
97:
212:
204:
224:
144:
for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
185:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
486:
380:
349:
320:
195:
Reliable sources should not be rejected because they are unavailable online or behind a paywall
84:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
149:
563:
413:
395:
366:
335:
304:
287:
273:
93:
211:). It may also be useful to know that you can access this and many other sources through
177:
173:
218:
125:
473:
181:
548:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the
362:
Minor changes like me changing the order of 2 sentences and removing the word also
286:
The comment asked people not to change the lead, which is the consensus version.
501:
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as
334:
more definitive statement in the article sourced to their investigation report.
121:
559:
529:
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
88:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
271:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/25/us/politics/fbi-bullet-trump-rally.html
112:
567:
482:
post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people
461:
421:
403:
388:
374:
357:
343:
328:
312:
295:
281:
256:
234:
189:
157:
101:
81:
116:
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
246:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Requests for comment/Jagged 85/Cleanup
244:
Given some of your recent edits you might be interested in
490:. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and
128:. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
363:
200:
544:or you may learn more about this contentious topic
523:
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
140:. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
169:Talk:Crime in San Francisco#Per capita crime rates
124:, did not appear to be constructive and have been
516:, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
496:imply that there are any issues with your editing
138:contributing constructively to this encyclopedia
526:follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
508:Within contentious topics, editors should edit
300:If you are referring to the NYT investigation
136:which also provides further information about
132:. You can find information about these at our
8:
167:Hello. Your request for a third opinion for
480:You have recently edited a page related to
520:adhere to the purposes of Knowledge (XXG);
68:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
266:
92:before the question. Again, welcome!
7:
34:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
467:Introduction to contentious topics
120:, such as the edit(s) you made to
25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
472:
111:
53:How to create your first article
542:arbitration clerks' noticeboard
532:refrain from gaming the system.
365:are not against the consensus.
1:
199:Hello Oort1! With regard to
568:20:55, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
585:
235:12:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
462:22:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
422:22:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
404:22:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
389:22:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
375:22:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
358:22:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
344:22:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
329:22:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
313:22:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
296:22:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
282:22:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
257:16:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
207:; the relevant policy is
118:your recent contributions
86:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
540:you may ask them at the
484:, a topic designated as
384:
353:
324:
102:23:37, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
434:Polygenic scores for IQ
190:09:34, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
158:02:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
130:policies and guidelines
48:How to develop articles
249:William M. Connolley
176:page or use another
163:3O request declined
515:
511:
503:contentious topics
495:
178:dispute resolution
44:How to edit a page
27:your contributions
21:Hello, Oort1, and
513:
509:
493:
240:Jagged 85/Cleanup
76:your messages on
576:
557:
551:
476:
233:
227:
221:
115:
91:
78:discussion pages
584:
583:
579:
578:
577:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
555:
549:
477:
469:
436:
264:
242:
225:
219:
216:
209:WP:SOURCEACCESS
197:
165:
109:
89:
63:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
582:
580:
534:
533:
530:
527:
524:
521:
514:constructively
497:
478:
471:
470:
468:
465:
454:186.168.87.152
435:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
263:
260:
241:
238:
196:
193:
164:
161:
108:
105:
66:
65:
60:
57:Article Wizard
50:
41:
36:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
581:
570:
569:
565:
561:
554:
553:Ctopics/aware
547:
543:
539:
531:
528:
525:
522:
519:
518:
517:
506:
504:
499:
491:
489:
488:
483:
475:
466:
464:
463:
459:
455:
449:
446:
443:
441:
433:
423:
419:
415:
411:
405:
401:
397:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
364:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
332:
331:
330:
326:
322:
317:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
297:
293:
289:
284:
283:
279:
275:
272:
269:
261:
259:
258:
254:
250:
247:
239:
237:
236:
231:
228:
222:
214:
210:
206:
202:
194:
192:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
170:
162:
160:
159:
155:
151:
148:. Thank you.
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
106:
104:
103:
99:
95:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
64:
61:
58:
54:
51:
49:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
19:
18:
537:
535:
507:
502:
500:
485:
481:
479:
450:
447:
444:
437:
299:
285:
265:
243:
198:
166:
150:Fred Zepelin
146:my talk page
142:your sandbox
134:welcome page
110:
67:
59:if you wish)
20:
16:
15:
558:template.
487:contentious
122:Harlan Crow
90:{{help me}}
80:using four
55:(using the
538:procedures
414:Polygnotus
396:Polygnotus
367:Polygnotus
336:Polygnotus
305:Polygnotus
288:Polygnotus
274:Polygnotus
215:. Thanks,
213:WP:LIBRARY
205:WP:OFFLINE
180:method. —
94:Jokestress
70:Wikipedian
510:carefully
268:official.
220:Apaugasma
201:this edit
72:! Please
182:LauritzT
126:reverted
107:May 2023
39:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
23:welcome
82:tildes
560:Hipal
492:does
174:WP:3O
564:talk
546:here
512:and
458:talk
418:talk
400:talk
385:talk
371:talk
354:talk
340:talk
325:talk
309:talk
292:talk
278:talk
253:talk
226:talk
186:talk
154:talk
98:talk
74:sign
46:and
494:not
381:Hi!
350:Hi!
321:Hi!
262:NYT
566:)
556:}}
550:{{
498:.
460:)
420:)
402:)
387:)
373:)
356:)
342:)
327:)
311:)
294:)
280:)
255:)
217:☿
188:)
156:)
100:)
562:(
456:(
416:(
398:(
383:(
369:(
352:(
338:(
323:(
307:(
290:(
276:(
251:(
232:)
230:☉
223:(
184:(
152:(
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
