820:, given your above statement on the deletion page about how you "love dearly" the founder of this website which you want deleted from Knowledge (XXG), you have been following him on Twitter for many years, and have gone to the Tech Report BBQ's. You admit you are on the website's user forum and are linking to new posts on it, which strongly suggests you are more involved with that website than you implied in the deletion proposal where you described it as just "a random tech site". Do you say that you just came across this Knowledge (XXG) entry, and are not involved in the website as a user?
611:
135:
506:
1032:
944:
434:
564:, the simple fact that I was able to add necessary information to support the statement in lede in less than 5 minutes proves the fact that what I said about you in my edit summary is true - you are not interested in improving the article to make it a usable, unbiased source of information, you are only interested in an attempts at removing as much criticism about the game as possible. Your
860:(including attracting an attention of other users, one of whom has actually provided a dozen of useful sources giving this article enough notability to survive any AfD nominations). In any case I would appreciate if you would discuss the relevant article on the article's discussion place and not here.
842:
There is no "conflict of interest" as my ONLY interest is making
Knowledge (XXG) a useful, reliable (as much as possible), non-promotional (in terms of financial gain for the subject of the articles) source of information. Nothing else. Instead of trying to accuse me, an editor who has made edits to
851:
and I will have to report you if you will continue doing this), I would HIGHLY and politely suggest you get back to improving the article in the ways I suggested in my reply on the article deletion discussion page. Unless, of course, you do not care about making
Knowledge (XXG) and this article in
901:
Now you have reverted again, saying: "I am sorry, but WP:RS still applies and forums are not a reliable source of information even when mentioned by
Secondary Source, especially since author of New Yorker article makes false claim about forum users being "expert" without even mentioning in which
368:
which I have reversed - there was a perfect reason why I did so. ALL of them link to articles to PERSONAL BLOGS, written by a person with SAME EXACT NAME, which is a perfectly clear example of someone trying to promote his/her personal blog, in particular all the articles written by him/her.
912:
Especially as you explicitly make the statement that The New Yorker's made a "false claim"? Even the irrelevant basis by which you justify your interpretation is mistaken, as you incorrectly say that The New Yorker never said which field of expertise, when my comment on the change quoted it
446:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
543:. Omgftwbbqsomethingrandom's edit summary was "Removing edit from an irrational fan of this game who is clearly not here to make Knowledge (XXG) useful but to only portray the game in "less negative" way." isn't suitable or friendly, but it isn't "absolutely unacceptable" either.
584:
guidelines/policies - you are free to do that, but I highly doubt that they will work for you. In any case, if you wish to discuss the article and related edits - do so on its talk page, and if you have issues with my edits in particular - you are free to open a discussion at
341:
Also, the websites you cite as breaking user generated content rules do not break these rules and don't seem to be personal blogs. Again, I've managed to find a better source for the content you've removed with a quick Google. You could do that too.
884:) The cite was not of a forum post, it was of The New Yorker, renown and independent publication, using the forums as a source, expressly noting its hardware expertise. The New Yorker is neither questionable nor self-published.
894:
First you revert that, at best mistakenly, as being a cite of a forum post, which violates WP:SPS. This, simply and factually, was inaccurate. It was not, it was a cite of the New Yorker as the citation plainly shows.
843:
many other articles independent of TechReport article and who has nominated other articles for deletion as well as voted for keeping or deleting many other articles at AfD, of some nonsense (you are trying to do now
1075:
987:
474:
572:, when you unreasonably reverted my edit and added inappropriate tag even AFTER I provided enough sources in an appropriate section. You are free to deny this as much as you want, it won't change my conclusion or
369:
Knowledge (XXG) has perfectly clear guideline which explains this behavior as well as how it should be dealt with, I suggest clicking on it and reading it before you continue typing more nonsense on my talk page:
908:
I will not engage in a revert war, but can you explain to me how you are not substituting your opinion of the primary source material (which in this case is the techreport forums) instead of The New Yorker's?
1059:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
971:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
458:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
905:
WP:RS plainly says: "This means that we publish the opinions only of reliable authors, and not the opinions of
Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves."
1045:
957:
624:
762:
produces a LUA error. This sounds odd to me as I hadn't encountered this before. Would you able to provide a screenshot of the error so I can take a look? Regards.
877:
22:
651:
218:
650:
217:
675:
242:
43:
373:. As for "finding better sources" - this is not my obligation, but you are free to do so, as long as they're not just another promotional attempt.
67:
856:
to just "make the icky bad man go away and stop touching the (nearly useless to general user) article", unlike myself, judging by the FACT that
75:
411:
I have no idea what exactly you wanted to say with this comment. Racism is racism, and it's bad regardless of which race/ethnicity is involved.
397:
349:
1098:
1009:
488:
920:
792:. I did not know when it would be fixed so I changed it to different method not dependent on templates. It appears to be fixed now.
172:
Hi, I didn't want to clutter Oshwah's talk page, so I'm posting here that I upped the archival cutoff to one year (365 days) on
57:
1094:
1005:
484:
1068:
980:
467:
62:
510:
861:
793:
590:
412:
374:
194:
1080:
992:
479:
756:
525:
353:
176:. Hope you don't mind, but if you want to - it's ok if you change the setting to your preferred choice. Thanks!
48:
34:
401:
324:
1056:
968:
817:
455:
316:
888:
On the proposed deletion page you put out the call for people to supply useful sources towards notability.
924:
916:
345:
86:
825:
338:
If you don't like a reference, take 30 seconds to find a better one rather than removing useful content.
98:
913:
specifically "hardware" (and the article's context clearly and unambiguously means computer hardware).
173:
78:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge (XXG). You can visit the
667:
234:
79:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
559:
550:
538:
521:
116:
102:
38:
1039:
951:
671:
442:
238:
891:
That's exactly what I did: The New Yorker once noted the community/site as being hardware experts.
723:
320:
290:
183:
1052:
964:
451:
769:
148:
852:
particular a useful source of information for general user, and you ONLY came here as a part of
97:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
837:
821:
365:
1064:
976:
463:
370:
1087:
999:
26:
1102:
1067:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1060:
1013:
979:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
972:
928:
869:
829:
801:
775:
727:
699:
674:
because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion
636:
598:
586:
581:
577:
552:
529:
492:
466:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
459:
420:
405:
382:
357:
328:
294:
266:
241:
because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion
202:
187:
159:
120:
813:
713:
631:
544:
280:
112:
90:
846:
617:
610:
134:
719:
286:
177:
789:
783:
763:
705:
272:
854:
vote brigading initiated by former editor of the site being discussed in the article
53:
1031:
943:
688:
505:
433:
255:
21:
Hello, Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom, and welcome to
Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
514:
749:
317:
https://www.polygon.com/2018/7/23/17602586/ninja-death-hoax-instagram-ligma
678:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please
315:
Hey man i found a better source bout ligma, hope you bring back the edit.
245:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please
1071:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
983:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
788:
the template was broken, you can see the info about it on the bottom of
576:. If you want to keep trying to achieve your agenda by playing with the
470:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1049:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
961:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
902:
field they are "experts" or how the author came to this conclusion"
94:
1084:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
996:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
812:
I am concerned that you proposed the deletion of the article on
694:
261:
1074:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
986:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
473:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1043:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
858:
I have done MORE to improving this article than you ever did
627:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
609:
616:
Hello, Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom. You have new messages at
111:, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
853:
513:
when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
396:
Yes, cause racism against "white people" does not exist.
955:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
1055:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
967:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
679:
573:
569:
565:
454:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
246:
107:
702:. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
623:
Message added 06:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC). You can
269:. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
589:, you are not welcomed here with your nonsense.
440:Hello, Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom. Voting in the
231:Question regarding "Trivia" section/information
519:That edit summary was absolutely unacceptable
392:This user ardently opposes all forms of RACISM
8:
106:
1026:
938:
914:
898:I note this mistake, and revert it back.
343:
718:(ban all bots) on your user talk page.
364:If you are talking about edits done by
285:(ban all bots) on your user talk page.
663:
230:
748:Hey there, in your latest summary on
7:
1040:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
952:2019 Arbitration Committee elections
443:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
147:Wished me a happy birthday! Thanks!
141:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
1057:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1023:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
969:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
456:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
49:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
935:ArbCom 2019 election voter message
427:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
74:You may also want to complete the
14:
1030:
942:
649:
504:
432:
216:
133:
63:How to create your first article
1078:and submit your choices on the
990:and submit your choices on the
664:Article names and WP:COMMONNAME
477:and submit your choices on the
82:to ask questions or seek help.
44:Contributing to Knowledge (XXG)
662:! You created a thread called
229:! You created a thread called
108:ask for help on your talk page
1:
1103:00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
1014:00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
802:06:54, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
776:06:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
728:19:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
642:Your thread has been archived
637:06:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
599:22:20, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
553:22:05, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
530:20:54, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
493:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
421:00:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
406:23:59, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
209:Your thread has been archived
876:Undid revision 907023705 by
692:, notification delivery by
383:20:08, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
358:14:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
329:10:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
259:, notification delivery by
193:No, I don't mind it at all.
25:, especially your edits to
1123:
1095:MediaWiki message delivery
1006:MediaWiki message delivery
647:
485:MediaWiki message delivery
214:
121:05:14, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
68:Simplified Manual of Style
929:12:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
870:21:25, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
830:08:55, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
574:conclusion of other users
295:19:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
203:05:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
188:04:08, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
132:
99:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
76:Knowledge (XXG) Adventure
1092:to your user talk page.
1004:to your user talk page.
878:Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom
865:
862:Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom
797:
794:Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom
668:Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse
660:Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom
594:
591:Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom
568:also proves that, so is
416:
413:Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom
378:
375:Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom
235:Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse
227:Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom
198:
195:Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom
160:05:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
58:How to develop articles
689:Lowercase sigmabot III
614:
535:Let's not exaggerate,
256:Lowercase sigmabot III
1053:Arbitration Committee
1037:Hello! Voting in the
965:Arbitration Committee
949:Hello! Voting in the
613:
452:Arbitration Committee
174:Talk:Windows Defender
680:create a new thread
509:Please remember to
247:create a new thread
126:A barnstar for you!
85:Please remember to
1069:arbitration policy
981:arbitration policy
752:, you stated that
710:(ban this bot) or
700:automated accounts
670:, but it has been
625:remove this notice
615:
468:arbitration policy
277:(ban this bot) or
267:automated accounts
237:, but it has been
54:How to edit a page
23:your contributions
1110:
1109:
1105:
1020:
1019:
931:
919:comment added by
816:when you have an
741:
740:
736:
730:
708:|deny=Muninnbot}}
511:assume good faith
360:
348:comment added by
308:
307:
303:
297:
275:|deny=Muninnbot}}
165:
164:
89:your messages on
27:AT&T Mobility
1114:
1093:
1091:
1034:
1027:
1003:
946:
939:
849:is talking about
841:
787:
772:
766:
761:
757:official website
755:
735:
717:
709:
697:
691:
685:
653:
646:
645:
628:
563:
547:
542:
508:
436:
334:Removing content
311:Ligma Death Hoax
302:
284:
276:
264:
258:
252:
220:
213:
212:
168:Windows Defender
157:
137:
130:
129:
110:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1085:
1025:
997:
937:
886:
835:
814:The Tech Report
810:
808:The Tech Report
790:discussion page
781:
770:
764:
759:
753:
746:
737:
711:
703:
693:
687:
644:
629:
622:
607:
560:Openlydialectic
557:
545:
539:Openlydialectic
536:
522:Openlydialectic
502:
497:
496:
437:
429:
398:205.175.107.198
394:
350:213.205.194.175
336:
313:
304:
278:
270:
260:
254:
211:
186:
170:
149:
128:
93:by typing four
72:
39:Getting started
19:
12:
11:
5:
1120:
1118:
1108:
1107:
1076:the candidates
1046:eligible users
1035:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1017:
988:the candidates
958:eligible users
947:
936:
933:
885:
874:
873:
872:
818:"apparent COI"
809:
806:
805:
804:
745:
742:
739:
738:
733:
656:
654:
643:
640:
621:
608:
606:
603:
602:
601:
555:
501:
498:
475:the candidates
438:
431:
430:
428:
425:
424:
423:
393:
390:
388:
386:
385:
335:
332:
321:WikiCoolPerson
312:
309:
306:
305:
300:
223:
221:
210:
207:
206:
205:
182:
169:
166:
163:
162:
144:
143:
138:
127:
124:
71:
70:
65:
60:
51:
46:
41:
31:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1119:
1106:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1089:
1083:
1082:
1077:
1072:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1048:
1047:
1042:
1041:
1036:
1033:
1029:
1028:
1022:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1001:
995:
994:
989:
984:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
960:
959:
954:
953:
948:
945:
941:
940:
934:
932:
930:
926:
922:
918:
910:
906:
903:
899:
896:
892:
889:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
850:
848:
845:exactly what
839:
834:
833:
832:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
785:
780:
779:
778:
777:
773:
767:
758:
751:
743:
734:
731:
729:
725:
721:
715:
707:
701:
696:
690:
683:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
655:
652:
648:
641:
639:
638:
635:
634:
626:
619:
612:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
561:
556:
554:
551:
548:
540:
534:
533:
532:
531:
527:
523:
520:
516:
512:
507:
500:November 2018
499:
495:
494:
490:
486:
482:
481:
476:
471:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
448:
445:
444:
435:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
391:
389:
384:
380:
376:
372:
367:
363:
362:
361:
359:
355:
351:
347:
339:
333:
331:
330:
326:
322:
318:
310:
301:
298:
296:
292:
288:
282:
274:
268:
263:
257:
250:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
222:
219:
215:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
191:
190:
189:
185:
181:
180:
175:
167:
161:
158:
156:
153:
146:
145:
142:
139:
136:
131:
125:
123:
122:
118:
114:
109:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
83:
81:
77:
69:
66:
64:
61:
59:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
36:
33:
32:
30:
28:
24:
16:
1079:
1073:
1050:
1044:
1038:
991:
985:
962:
956:
950:
915:— Preceding
911:
907:
904:
900:
897:
893:
890:
887:
881:
857:
844:
838:Concentrate2
822:Concentrate2
811:
747:
732:
686:Archival by
684:
659:
657:
632:
630:
518:
503:
478:
472:
449:
441:
439:
395:
387:
344:— Preceding
340:
337:
314:
299:
253:Archival by
251:
226:
224:
178:
171:
155:
151:
140:
103:my talk page
101:, ask me on
84:
73:
35:Introduction
20:
1081:voting page
993:voting page
921:100.6.9.235
480:voting page
366:this editor
1065:topic bans
977:topic bans
633:CASSIOPEIA
566:other edit
546:soetermans
515:Fallout 76
464:topic bans
113:Huggums537
91:talk pages
1061:site bans
973:site bans
750:The Verge
744:The Verge
720:Muninnbot
695:Muninnbot
460:site bans
287:Muninnbot
262:Muninnbot
179:byteflush
917:unsigned
784:Lordtobi
765:Lordtobi
672:archived
605:Talkback
570:this one
346:unsigned
239:archived
80:Teahouse
17:Welcome!
1088:NoACEMM
1000:NoACEMM
698:, both
371:WP:SPAM
265:, both
714:nobots
587:WP:ANI
582:WP:CIV
578:WP:AGF
281:nobots
150:Horses
95:tildes
847:WP:PA
618:WP:TH
319:Tnx!
105:, or
1099:talk
1051:The
1010:talk
963:The
925:talk
882:talk
866:talk
826:talk
798:talk
724:talk
706:bots
676:here
595:talk
580:and
526:talk
489:talk
450:The
417:talk
402:talk
379:talk
354:talk
325:talk
291:talk
273:bots
243:here
199:talk
184:Talk
154:Nice
117:talk
87:sign
56:and
37:and
666:at
658:Hi
233:at
225:Hi
152:ARE
1101:)
1090:}}
1086:{{
1063:,
1012:)
1002:}}
998:{{
975:,
927:)
868:)
828:)
800:)
774:)
760:}}
754:{{
726:)
716:}}
712:{{
704:{{
682:.
597:)
549:.
528:)
517:.
491:)
483:.
462:,
419:)
404:)
381:)
356:)
327:)
293:)
283:}}
279:{{
271:{{
249:.
201:)
119:)
1097:(
1008:(
923:(
880:(
864:(
840::
836:@
824:(
796:(
786::
782:@
771:✉
768:(
722:(
620:.
593:(
562::
558:@
541::
537:@
524:(
487:(
415:(
400:(
377:(
352:(
323:(
289:(
197:(
115:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
