798:
systematically and savagely deleting all mentions of Bracha
Ettinger, gestures accompanied by untrue statements which are purposely misleading other editors. You have also deleted mentions and books properly referenced. You seem to be driven by personal or political rage. You cannot delete properly referenced mentions. Concerning some of you particular untrue and misleading informations here are some examples: 1- Contrary to what you claim, Ettinger had a one-peron show at the Israel Museum in 1995. The exhibition was curated by the Israel Museum curator Meira Perry. It was accompanied by the catalogue "Bracha Lichtenberg Ettinger: Halala - Autistwork". Edited by Meira Perry-Lehmann and Michèle Guedj. ( ISBN 2-910845-06-0) with texts by Christine Buci-Glucksmann, Jean-François Lyotard, and Griselda Pollock. (English/ français/ Hebrew). The exhibition was inaugurated by Jean-Francois Lyotard, followed by a conference at the Van Leer Institute in Jerusalem. The whole event was documented and later on translated to Hebrew so that a big dossier was much later on printed in the Israeli main Art Journal "Studio" n. 99 in 1998. You pretend that the exhibition didn't take place. We have grounds to believe that you are trying to break Ettinger's reputation, because the event was important to the Israeli "left" with Prof. Adi Ofir heading the conference in Van Leer. 2- Contrary to what you claim, Bracha Ettinger had a one-person exhibition at the Brussel's Beaux-Arts in 2000, curated by Piet Coessens. This was included in a bigger operation alongside the exhibition Azetta (Accompanied by the book Azetta by Flammarion). The catalogue that accompanied the event is Bracha Lichtenberg Ettinger: Artworking 1985-1999. Edited by Piet Coessens. Ghent-Amsterdam: Ludion / Brussels: Palais des Beaux-Arts, 2000. (ISBN 90-5544-283-6). You untruely pretend that the exhibition didn't take place and is not referenced. 3- Ettinger's studios are in Paris and Tel Aviv. Like most EGS faculty she doesn't live in Switzerland. You wrongly pretend that she lives in Switzerland. 4- I have checked the books that have been recently deleted by you and by anonymous ip's that seem to be you, like
806:. You clearly seem to have an organized agenda to "purge" Knowledge from Ettinger, for personal or most probably political reasons. Please respect Knowledge rules. Misinformation and barbaric deletions are not acceptable. It is possible that Ettinger's page was started by somebody you do not trust, but this is not important. The page was later on taken by others and by serious contibuters like myself who work at a university library and am engaged in art, gender, psychoanalysis and feminist issues, and who is very serious and hard working. Ettinger is often visited online at our library and there is ample doctorat research on her work as is obvious from Google Books and Google Scholars. The same goes for another serious Israeli woman artist Michal Heiman. She is well known as a woman artist and as a "left" person, and some people seem to attack her for these reasons. The fact that Heiman's page was opened by the user you are attacking is irrelevant to her serious reputation.
612:
had in July 2007, which is around the time that the soane page was filled with any content) contains a phrasing much more similar, if not identical, to the one on soane. The process is usually the opposite, so if the text were copied from soane originally in 2003, the current version should have been further away from it, not closer to it. In fact, Paul himself wrote some of the phrasing currently used on the soane website. I don't think that the conclusion that the webmaster of that website copied text from
Knowledge should lead to the conclusion that Dr. Gordon Higgott is a fraud, as it's highly unlikely that he created the website or used any text from Knowledge in his books (at least without verifying it against independent sources first, and even in that case it's unlikely that he used Knowledge).
802:, and the all indeed contain chapters on Ettinger and contrary to what you claim the information on the books are correct. I work at a University library and I am checking it now. 5- Ettinger is one of the rare women artists written on regularly by Jean-Francois Lyotard. This is an important reference for feminists in art and in gender studies. You might prefer to include in the list of the artists Lyotard talked about only the men-geniuses, but you cannot misinform and distort history. See for example SUNY's book
744:
suggestion, though. WP thrives on consensus, and that is best done in the most central place for the given issue. For the issue of
Ettinger's notability, that would have been the talk page for her article, but it now appears to be at Modernist's "comment here" link. All the inadequately explained deletions scattered across lots of articles have been hurting the credibility of the position that you're supporting. You might benefit by seeking the advice of Modernist or other involved admins, and check out
597:) you'll see that the text at that point was simply copy and pasted from the Soane. The text, in some form or the other, is rather old. Then again, if this is indeed the case, then Dr Gordon Higgott should be denounced as a really big fraud, I believe, and not an authority at all on the subject (he wrote some books about Inigo Jones) as he claims. By past record, I think we should assume the opposite regarding WP and Copyright infringements.
410:. Making legal threats is grounds for immediate indefinite blocking. I have not done so, because I don't know if you have grounds for your claim, as I am not a lawyer, nor are the vast majority of people who will read your threat on the Village Pump. If you want something done by someone official with the Wikimedia Foundation, please contact
820:
I would have said that this is
Ettinger Herself defending herself, but I doubt if her English is that poor. Anyway, I will not comment on anonymous claims -- if someone wish to smear my name (and I am registered by my real name) -- by all means, that's part of the deal, but it isn't decent to do this
685:
No problem...I am as much as you seem to be, really worried about copyvios. I also don't like PD text simply lifted and made into an article. The articles I have worked on used PD sources a lot, but in my wording as much as possible, or the wording of other editors here. That article is overdue to be
611:
Even though it's not the most reliable of sources, according to the page exists only since 2006 and only has content on it from some time in 2007. If you read the diff you linked to, you can see that it has a lot of the same text but differently ordered while the current version (and the one that we
782:
Ettinger is mainly notable in the field of
Lacanian and post-Lacanian interpretation, which has its place, of course, but Ettinger is not a leading force there, and so should be alloted a secondary role as interpreter, when appropriate. E.g. when Judith Butler writes a book about Antigona, it's more
110:
I have quite a serious objection. About 200 words are copied (you might have missed the last paragraph, which is simply copy and pasted from the source). There are also other problems (one paragraph contains exactly the same content, copied from two sources, which makes this article look even worse.
575:
Hi, Ori: Having edited this article on several occasions since 2003, I have seen how the article has progressively been expanded and improved over time (if you look back to the very first edits, you will some bits that have been retained in the latest version; numerous other editors have then made
432:
Hi Ori. If my response to your post at the Pump seemed negative, it's only because I felt you should have addressed your concerns to the
Foundation and Brad Patrick (which you also appear to have done), not to a general forum. However, linkspam is one of my personal pet peeves, and after reviewing
342:
This way others will see what is going on and can discuss before deleting (or removing the copyvio template). You might also try mailing the organization from whom the material was copied (in this case, the aussie govt) and asking for permission or clarification of their policy. In the case of the
483:
I noticed that you tagged the Cesária Évora article for copywrite violation again. What is the problem? This article has been rewritten with information drawn from mutliple sources and been deeply reviewed through the articles of deletion process. Are we missing something or is this vandalism?
743:
Yes, that's what I wondered, too, Ori, and I'm just a casual editor who stumbled onto this. Now that I've followed the link that
Modernist provided, I see that a number of admins are giving this issue significant attention, so I'll drop my meager attention to this. Just thought I'd leave with a
457:
article as having copyright problems. I believe that this is not the case. See the version by user
Acmuller at 07:54 11 August 2003 and the slightly earlier anonymous version (also by AcMuller before he registered). He is the writer / copyright holder for that entry in the Buddhist Digital
797:
What's going on here with all these savage deletions of
Ettinger? You are misinforming and you violating basic rules. if you believe that some facts about articles are wrong give the references. The references you have given are all untrue. You have been violating Knowledge basic rules by
362:
Hi, note that the "Knowledge:Copyright_problems..." link is point B above. Regarding US government materials, aside from the fact that copying stuff usually leads to a low quality article, but perhaps there should be a proper template for (like the "1911" template) for that.
762:
Notable enough to have an article, yes, but not notable enough for the abundance of links. The question is of relative notability in her field. Most, if not all the references to her were added from
December 2007 to the beginning of February 2008 by a user with just an IP
376:, can you write some comments in the discussion page about your specific concerns so I can work to resolve rather than just leaving the page in a copyvio status. Also, whats the procedure for this? Is the page on a list somwhere waiting to be resolved? Thanks. -
100:
which is actually public domain. To be frank, I see very little which appears copied directly from the OU article. Unless you have a serious objection (or anything I missed), I'm going to lift the the copyvio message as the Jewish Encyclopedia is public domain.
521:
a copyvio problem. I'm not happy about being a dick, but when you see that a comment about the copyvio was posted in September and ignored, one must take more dramatic steps to get attention. And it seems that will have to be one in the near future too, here.
496:
I found your comments at discussion. I'm not sure that you are right but gave you the benefit of the doubt and did some more editing, which should remove all concern. In the future you might contact people rather than tag the article. Remember
771:
Many of the mentions seem fake or I was not able to corroborate them. The artist is claimed to have held a one-person exhibition in the Israel museum and one at the BOZAR, but no mention of this appears anywhere except in the artists own
253:
when you do so. It is a real pain to have to go through to those pages, find out where the copyright is, and try to clear that up. I've been trawling through your edit history, and I am unable to see which changes are the addition of the
659:
Then next time you bother to leave a massive copyvio tag in the articlespace, if the work is from the public domain (as it is) then simply add quotes and a ref....? I removed the text and the copyvio tag now, so that should solve the
437:
with the intention of vigorously defending it from further "Spam attacks". Please let me know if you're aware of this issue cropping up in other articles, or if you have any questions or comments. Good luck, and happy editing.
120:
Looking further into the matter, and examining the history of this article, I've decided to revert this and seek the opinion of others in this matter. The decision here should not be made by you in this matter, I believe.
824:
I also want to clarify that I do not have an agenda except improving articles and if this agenda is strengthened by removing links and mentions when inappropriate, that's what I'm going to do. 21:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
767:), which I am informed is no other than Nimrod Kamer, who was blocked here with several of his sock puppets. I cannot tell if this is indeed the case, but my suspicion was aroused by two facts:
190:. Can you please provide a reason/link for tagging this article as copyvio? And please don't sign you name on the main space, instead specify that you added a copyvio tag in the edit summary.
723:
Whats going on - if you google her she's notable, as both an artist and writer. Not a household name, or a frontburner persona - but seemingly she exists, why the deletions? What basis?
217:. I have removed the copyvio notice. In general, government works are not subject to copyright in the US, although there are of course exceptions. Thanks for your diligence, however.
699:
The original editor added the material back a few days ago, I reverted and he re-added it again. I attached the tag again as a matter of procedure. The matter is under debate at
264:
template and which are not. It would be very helpful if you would leave edit comments, and also if you would follow the instructions in the copyvio template (linked above).
96:
I took a look at the article and the OU article, and frankly although there is a lot if information that is similar, it seems that the current article borrows more from the
267:
Again, I want to thank you for your effort to clean up copyright problems (it's a pain in the ass), but I worry you might be a little too aggressive about this presently.
373:
312:
If you have just labeled this page as a possible copyright infringement, please add the following to the bottom of Knowledge:Copyright_problems/2006_July_17/Articles
137:
On 4-June, you started the nomination process for deleting this redirect, but you did not correctly follow all the steps. The RFD2 tag is supposed to be added to
538:
My advice is to ignore the anon user posting as "Mark." We're only encouraging him by engaging him, don't you think? I won't be responding to him again. |
775:
The articles quoted or referenced as written by her are systematically wrong -- either the year is wrong or the book is not the correct one, and so on.
458:
Dictionary (to which I have also contributed and know well) and so is entitled to use his own material. Please re-instate the article. Thanks. --
292:
If I understand this correctly, there are three things to doing this correctly: A. Add a clear note in the Edit summary. B. Add the right line to
69:
829:
Following a request from Ettinger: I urge anyone involved to judge mentions of her and her work by merit, not by Kamer or anything else. Thanks.
53:
29:
to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
807:
235:
Thanks. You're right here. Still, if the article is copied, this should be clearly indicated and not disguised as "reference".
700:
517:
There is no question about me being right or wrong -- it's a simple question of whether the text is copied or not and it is
145:. Please also see that page for instructions all how to complete a nomination. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. --
72:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
778:
Some of the facts are wrong (e.g., she's listed as a French artist, while actually being an Israeli based in Switzerland).
331:
38:
26:
576:
various additions, etc). IMHO the text on the Soane Museum page is a copy of text from Knowledge, not vice versa.
627:
214:
164:
58:
728:
811:
708:
298:
Sorry for being overly aggressive, the volume of copyvio's is rather staggering (and pissing one off too).
633:
I think that material is fine to use since it is from a U.S. Government source and in the public domain.--
141:
and not the article. I have completed the nomination and you may wish to participate in the discussion at
33:
415:
249:
You are incorrectly adding items to the copyright violations page. Furthermore, you are not leaving any
65:
753:
161:
734:
316:
73:
704:
459:
352:
276:
226:
48:
80:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
543:
508:
488:
97:
764:
581:
439:
411:
258:
830:
784:
749:
672:
646:
598:
556:
532:
523:
469:
407:
393:
364:
343:
previous example above (the us govt), looking through their site would have been helpful.
299:
236:
200:
187:
179:
122:
112:
102:
81:
730:
146:
433:
the link that concerns you, I also found it unacceptable. Therefore, I've watchlisted
593:
Hi Paul, if you go back in time, to the period before you even started editing this (
468:
Done. I apologise for the misunderstanding. This should be edited/re-written though.
423:
348:
286:
272:
222:
142:
138:
43:
645:
Fine to use. Not so fine to copy. Even less, to copy without attributing to source.
159:
Please read the process for listing an article for copyvio, before you do it again.
613:
539:
131:
392:
I've added some comments on the discussion page (I'm going to in a bit, I mean).
745:
724:
577:
568:
687:
661:
634:
434:
686:
made a lot more than it is, if I ever get the time. Anyway, best wishes!--
419:
191:
838:
815:
792:
757:
738:
712:
690:
680:
664:
654:
637:
616:
606:
585:
559:
547:
526:
511:
491:
472:
462:
442:
426:
396:
380:
367:
356:
302:
280:
239:
230:
203:
194:
149:
125:
115:
105:
84:
386:
377:
169:
454:
90:
498:
172:
821:
anonymously. I cannot thus relate to any of the arguments.
765:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/84.229.43.161
671:
You're right, sorry for being too hasty in slapping this.
594:
325:
321:
293:
295:. C. Add the url properly to the copyvio template.
374:Australian Commercial Television Code of Practice
372:Hi, I'd like to resolve the copyvio issues on
8:
414:, but see the email address at the top of
64:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
453:I see that you have recently flagged the
783:important than an article by Ettinger.
7:
555:I think you're right. My mistake...
76:, ask me on my talk page, or place
748:, if you haven't done so already.
727:says the opposite...comment here:
14:
199:Sorry. I've tried to fix that.
701:Talk:Grand Teton National Park
1:
473:16:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
463:02:33, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
443:19:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
427:20:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
34:The five pillars of Knowledge
617:13:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
607:15:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
54:How to write a great article
839:14:25, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
816:11:36, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
793:09:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
758:21:02, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
739:15:32, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
703:, if you wish to weigh in.
586:14:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
560:22:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
548:15:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
527:01:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
512:00:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
492:00:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
449:Asanga / Copyright problems
186:You adeed a copyvio tag to
854:
713:00:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
691:00:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
681:08:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
665:22:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
655:16:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
638:23:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
628:Grand Teton National Park
418:for how to contact him.
397:04:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
381:01:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
368:18:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
357:11:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
303:07:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
281:03:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
240:15:55, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
231:15:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
215:Talk:Ralph K. Winter, Jr.
204:03:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
195:23:03, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
150:13:51, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
834:
788:
676:
650:
602:
126:10:31, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
116:10:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
106:02:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
85:02:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
209:re:Ralph K. Winter, Jr.
25:Hello, Ori Redler, and
571:- Copyright violation?
416:User talk:BradPatrick
804:Gender after Lyotard
800:Laughing with Medusa
98:encyclopedia article
308:also, you need to:
74:Knowledge:Questions
39:How to edit a page
16:Nothing here yet.
546:
845:
542:
412:User:BradPatrick
355:
329:
279:
263:
257:
229:
79:
853:
852:
848:
847:
846:
844:
843:
842:
721:
719:Bracha Ettinger
631:
573:
536:
533:Talk:Serial Box
481:
451:
404:
347:
319:
271:
261:
255:
247:
221:
211:
188:Jasper, Alberta
184:
180:Jasper, Alberta
157:
135:
94:
77:
59:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
851:
849:
828:
780:
779:
776:
773:
720:
717:
716:
715:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
669:
668:
667:
630:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
572:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
535:
530:
516:
480:
477:
476:
475:
450:
447:
446:
445:
403:
400:
360:
359:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
246:
245:copyvio issues
243:
210:
207:
183:
177:
156:
153:
134:
129:
93:
88:
70:sign your name
62:
61:
56:
51:
46:
41:
36:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
850:
841:
840:
836:
832:
826:
822:
818:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
795:
794:
790:
786:
777:
774:
770:
769:
768:
766:
760:
759:
755:
751:
747:
741:
740:
736:
732:
729:
726:
718:
714:
710:
706:
705:CosmicPenguin
702:
698:
692:
689:
684:
683:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
663:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
636:
629:
626:
618:
615:
610:
609:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
583:
579:
570:
567:
561:
558:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
534:
531:
529:
528:
525:
520:
514:
513:
510:
505:
502:
500:
494:
493:
490:
485:
479:Cesária Évora
478:
474:
471:
467:
466:
465:
464:
461:
460:Stephen Hodge
456:
448:
444:
441:
436:
431:
430:
429:
428:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
402:Legal threats
401:
399:
398:
395:
390:
388:
383:
382:
379:
375:
370:
369:
366:
358:
354:
350:
346:
341:
335:
332:
327:
323:
318:
317:Scott Maccabe
315:
314:
313:
310:
309:
307:
306:
305:
304:
301:
296:
294:
290:
288:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
265:
260:
252:
251:edit comments
244:
242:
241:
238:
233:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
208:
206:
205:
202:
197:
196:
193:
189:
181:
178:
176:
174:
171:
167:
166:
163:
154:
152:
151:
148:
144:
140:
133:
130:
128:
127:
124:
118:
117:
114:
108:
107:
104:
99:
92:
89:
87:
86:
83:
75:
71:
67:
60:
57:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
32:
31:
30:
28:
23:
22:
17:
827:
823:
819:
808:87.69.90.201
803:
799:
796:
781:
761:
742:
722:
632:
574:
537:
518:
515:
509:Kevin Murray
506:
503:
495:
489:Kevin Murray
486:
482:
452:
440:Doc Tropics
405:
391:
384:
371:
361:
344:
334:
311:
297:
291:
284:
268:
266:
250:
248:
234:
218:
212:
198:
185:
160:
158:
136:
132:Rabah Zobeir
119:
109:
95:
63:
24:
20:
18:
15:
725:User:Cailil
569:Inigo Jones
406:Please see
213:Please see
182:copyvio tag
155:Pedro Lopez
831:Ori Redler
785:Ori Redler
750:Rich Janis
673:Ori Redler
647:Ori Redler
599:Ori Redler
557:Ori Redler
524:Ori Redler
470:Ori Redler
435:Serial Box
394:Ori Redler
365:Ori Redler
300:Ori Redler
237:Ori Redler
201:Ori Redler
165:Farmbrough
123:Ori Redler
113:Ori Redler
103:Bachrach44
82:Bachrach44
78:{{helpme}}
66:Wikipedian
44:Help pages
731:Modernist
540:Mr. Darcy
326:last edit
147:JLaTondre
68:! Please
660:issue.--
504:Thanks.
420:User:Zoe
408:WP:LEGAL
170:14 June
49:Tutorial
21:Welcome!
614:Yonatan
322:history
259:copyvio
175:(GMT).
27:welcome
772:pages.
578:Paul W
455:Asanga
424:(talk)
333:. ~~~~
168:16:27
143:WP:RFD
139:WP:RFD
688:MONGO
662:MONGO
635:MONGO
519:still
330:from
91:abaye
835:talk
812:talk
789:talk
754:talk
746:WP:N
735:talk
709:Talk
677:talk
651:talk
603:talk
595:here
582:talk
544:talk
499:DBAD
353:talk
345:...
277:talk
269:...
227:talk
219:...
173:2006
162:Rich
389:,
385:Hi
289:,
285:Hi
192:Qyd
837:)
814:)
791:)
756:)
737:)
711:)
679:)
653:)
605:)
584:)
507:--
501:.
487:--
438:--
387:E!
378:E!
349:aa
324:·
287:aa
273:aa
262:}}
256:{{
223:aa
101:--
833:(
810:(
787:(
763:(
752:(
733:(
707:(
675:(
649:(
601:(
580:(
422:|
351::
328:)
320:(
275::
225::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.