Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Pauken

Source 📝

226: 305: 356: 77: 151: 118: 262:
I assumed that the copyright information I provided when uploading to Wiki was appropriate. I wonder if you can provide a simpler method of my having the image re-instated than my having to decipher the rather legalistic avenues of approach evident in the post. If the image on the Orchestra's website
258:
I received no message to say this talk had been updated; that is why I did not reply about the removal of the photo. I am the webmaster for Preston Symphony Orchestra and was provided the image by a player whose family took the photograph with the express purpose of having it placed on their website.
331:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
413:
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to
143:
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to
188:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
368:, which you've attributed to Melbourne City Opera. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. 335:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
328: 263:
contained a Creative Commons attribution, would that have obviated your deletion of the image? I'm not a very experienced Wiki contributor and wish to comply - I just need a little help here.
451:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is
27:
Unfortunatley, much of it is copied directly from the company's website which, under Knowledge (XXG) guidelines, is not allowed. Please the following which may be found on each edit page:
272: 267:
Assuming the Preston Symphony Orchestra and copryight owner wish to license the image under a creative-commons license, you or a member of the orchestra should read
89:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 380: 101: 441: 178: 317: 268: 460: 198: 85: 371:
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
468: 206: 395:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 213: 125:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 245: 445: 437: 182: 174: 210: 92:
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
168: 464: 423: 202: 162: 33:"Please do not copy and paste from copyrighted websites – only public domain resources can be copied without permission." 321: 403: 430: 39:
Therefore, I have removed a variety of things from the article, but you are welcome to come back and re-work it in
312: 296: 452: 364: 284: 133: 376: 249: 97: 48: 17: 396: 126: 57:
As Webmaster of the MCO website I can honestly say "they were my words"! See discussion on MCO page
341: 276: 280: 232: 72:
File permission problem with File:Preston Symphony Orchestra performing Verdi's Requiem.jpg
44: 457:
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
195:
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
337: 472: 225: 416: 392: 260: 58: 444:
justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See
181:
justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See
390:
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
111:
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
288: 216: 24:
I believe that you are the original editor who created this article.
477: 345: 66: 52: 329:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Preston Symphony Orchestra
220: 86:
File:Preston Symphony Orchestra performing Verdi's Requiem.jpg
354: 75: 409:
to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
139:
to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
316:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
310:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
237: 190: 448:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
185:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
275:, explicitly granting the license, by email, to the 467:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 244:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their 205:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 235:has been answered. If you need more help, you can 351:File permission problem with File:LuciaMCOth.jpg 461:section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion 422:If you believe the media meets the criteria at 161:If you believe the media meets the criteria at 201:. You may wish to read the Knowledge (XXG)'s 8: 438:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags#Fair use 175:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags#Fair use 236: 463:. You may wish to read Knowledge (XXG)'s 318:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 379:or another acceptable free license (see 100:or another acceptable free license (see 385:at the site of the original publication 375:make a note permitting reuse under the 106:at the site of the original publication 96:make a note permitting reuse under the 7: 446:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags 436:or one of the other tags listed at 183:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags 173:or one of the other tags listed at 14: 327:The article will be discussed at 424:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 303: 224: 163:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 149: 116: 469:Media copyright questions page 346:00:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC) 207:Media copyright questions page 1: 399:. If you take this step, add 129:. If you take this step, add 199:criteria for speedy deletion 67:06:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC) 53:17:46, 18 October 2009 (UTC) 248:, or consider visiting the 71: 493: 478:12:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC) 313:Preston Symphony Orchestra 297:Preston Symphony Orchestra 217:07:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC) 289:04:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 150: 117: 320:or whether it should be 62: 453:a list of your uploads 359: 273:declaration of consent 80: 362:Thanks for uploading 358: 83:Thanks for uploading 79: 426:, use a tag such as 239:ask another question 169:non-free fair use in 165:, use a tag such as 18:Melbourne City Opera 365:File:LuciaMCOth.jpg 459:, as described in 404:permission pending 360: 197:, as described on 81: 431:non-free fair use 256: 255: 241:on your talk page 41:in your own words 484: 475: 465:image use policy 435: 429: 408: 402: 357: 307: 306: 243: 228: 221: 203:image use policy 172: 156: 154: 153: 152: 138: 132: 123: 121: 120: 119: 78: 492: 491: 487: 486: 485: 483: 482: 481: 473: 471:. Thank you. -- 433: 427: 406: 400: 355: 353: 308: 304: 301: 191:your upload log 171:|article name}} 166: 148: 146: 136: 130: 115: 113: 76: 74: 22: 12: 11: 5: 490: 488: 411: 410: 388: 352: 349: 302: 300: 295:Nomination of 293: 292: 291: 254: 253: 246:user talk page 229: 147:permissions-en 141: 140: 114:permissions-en 109: 73: 70: 37: 36: 35: 34: 21: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 489: 480: 479: 476: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 449: 447: 443: 439: 432: 425: 420: 418: 417: 405: 398: 394: 393: 389: 386: 382: 378: 374: 373: 372: 369: 367: 366: 350: 348: 347: 343: 339: 333: 330: 325: 323: 319: 315: 314: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 265: 264: 261: 251: 247: 242: 240: 234: 230: 227: 223: 222: 219: 218: 215: 212: 209:. Thank you. 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 186: 184: 180: 176: 170: 164: 159: 157: 155:wikimedia.org 135: 128: 124: 122:wikimedia.org 110: 107: 103: 99: 95: 94: 93: 90: 88: 87: 69: 68: 64: 60: 55: 54: 50: 46: 42: 32: 31: 30: 29: 28: 25: 19: 16: 456: 450: 440:, and add a 421: 415: 412: 391: 384: 370: 363: 361: 334: 326: 311: 309: 299:for deletion 271:then send a 257: 238: 233:help request 194: 187: 177:, and add a 160: 145: 142: 134:OTRS pending 112: 105: 91: 84: 82: 56: 40: 38: 26: 23: 281:Crisco 1492 45:Viva-Verdi 442:rationale 381:this list 277:OTRS team 269:this page 211:Fut.Perf. 179:rationale 102:this list 377:CC-BY-SA 338:Boneymau 250:Teahouse 98:CC-BY-SA 474:Minorax 322:deleted 20:article 59:Pauken 231:This 397:here 387:; or 342:talk 285:talk 279:. — 127:here 108:; or 63:talk 49:talk 419:. 158:. 455:. 434:}} 428:{{ 407:}} 401:{{ 383:) 344:) 324:. 287:) 193:. 167:{{ 137:}} 131:{{ 104:) 65:) 51:) 43:. 340:( 283:( 252:. 214:☼ 61:( 47:(

Index

Melbourne City Opera
Viva-Verdi
talk
17:46, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Pauken
talk
06:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Preston Symphony Orchestra performing Verdi's Requiem.jpg
CC-BY-SA
this list
here
OTRS pending
Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content
non-free fair use in
Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags#Fair use
rationale
Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags
your upload log
criteria for speedy deletion
image use policy
Media copyright questions page
Fut.Perf.

07:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
check-mark
help request
ask another question on your talk page
user talk page
Teahouse

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.