User talk:Periglio - Knowledge (XXG)

2256:

remaining usable information during the pending Village Pump RfC for the immediate bot removal of all remaining Persondata templates. Would you be willing to revisit your original decision and discuss an alternative plan for the continued manual transfer of accurate and usable elements of Persondata to Wikidata during an extended period of deprecation, say, 6 to 12 months? If you are receptive to such a discussion, I have some proposed details of such a plan to share. Thank you for your consideration.

2230: 2208: 2557: 2482: 2409: 2336: 1491: 1416: 1062: 1708: 1641: 1566: 1345: 1279: 1216: 971: 905: 840: 779: 718: 661: 604: 542: 437: 376: 315: 254: 185: 2079:

Hello! I apologize for it taking a year for me to get back to you. Currently the Charles Bucke page tends to get its date and other things constantly altered by bots. It may have been the current accepted format at one point, but been changed by someone's script running through the site. I'll give it

1943:

It should be possible to build such lists from Infoboxes (or Wikidata, but that's less useful for checking content on this site). Bear in mind that your lists won't help us with cases where the persondata is different to that visible in the article. Also, please redirect the talk page of that page to

1969:

From my own experience, Persondata is the best source for a database of notable people despite its many faults. There are too many variations within infoboxes and the date templates making the process much more complicated. I agree that Wikidata is the way to go, but I have not seen any explanations

1832:

Greetings fellow disambiguator! Remember back in February when we made history by clearing the board for the first time ever, for the monthly disambiguation contest? Let's do it again in May! I personally will be aiming to lead the board next month, but for anyone who thinks they can put in a better

2255:

Hi, Periglio. I am aware you were part of the group of 6 or 7 editors who made the judgment that there was no further practical means for transferring usable and accurate information from the English Knowledge (XXG)'s Persondata templates. I also know that you expressed some trepidation about

1794:

Knowledge (XXG) is benefiting from my esoteric project as I am taking the trouble to fix the thousands of inconsistencies that my software has highlighted. However, as I am only personally interested in actual dates, I can not be bothered to argue about the use of c. or circa! I have left the

1981:

I used the data for my own personal, and admittedly trivia project. The point I want to make is that Knowledge (XXG) has an easy accessible database of over 1 million people. It is data available for serious research projects. Why delete it? Wikidata worries me as it is detached from the main

2421:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2494:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1833:

effort, I will give a $ 10 Amazon gift card to any editor who scores more disambiguation points in May. Also, I will be setting up a one-day contest later in the month, and will try to set up more prizes and other ways to make this a fun and productive month. Cheers!

2128: 2348:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

2522: 2449: 2376: 2291:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1782:

states that c. is preferred over circa, this only applies to the visual content on Knowledge (XXG). The Persondata template provides meta data for automated bots and the consensus is that a specific key word ie

501:

Please note that I have reverted your change to the article about Kiviaq, as "Kiviaq" is his legal name. He won a lawsuit to have it be his legal name, in fact. It is his Euro-style name which is the alternate.

1809:

Thanks for your comment and my sincere apologies. If this is the case, I will be using circa rather than c. in the Persondata dates from now on and have restored your edit to the article in question,

2506:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2433:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2360:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2024:

Hello. Thank you for calling my attention regarding this matter. I'm not familiar with Talk pages yet. Is this where I could defend keeping the article, or should I do it in the article's Talk page?

1138:

Thanks for reply me, I see my edit and Yes, That was my mistake and now both article & your talk edits are reverted, Actually i don't know how i was make a mistake, So Sorry for my warning. :-

124: 120: 1916:

Wow, you are the first anybody that I know who uses persondata. I've got a RFC written up, but haven't submitted it yet. I've asked a couple of people to look at it. It is located

2573: 521:

Good point, i had not realized that the date stamps were shown by the viewer and not the poster. We will just include the birth year which is completely sufficient. --

2567:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the 1091: 1515: 134: 1920:. Any comments or changes you see that needs to be made are very welcome. I'm not the real smart one when it comes to get info out of Knowledge (XXG), 1086: 1041:

regarding categorization by birth year. Where the year of birth or death is approximate, categories by year should be used with the best approximation.

58: 2578: 1892:

Ah I see, I have removed a few misplaced disambig templates as part of my Persondata fixing. I suppose it all helps towards the overall goal

130: 2147: 2101: 2001: 1440: 2536: 2463: 2390: 2316: 1810: 2243: 2221: 1960: 1153: 112: 2189: 43: 2532: 2459: 2386: 2312: 1172:

I got a couple of comments about my Judi Dench edit, so please refer to the comment (and ongoing discussion?) on my talk page.

1131: 2515: 2442: 2369: 48: 1854:

If you are still watching, I have no idea how I have been labelled as a disambiguator. I'm up for any editing sprees though.

127:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean.." article titles. 22: 507: 2563: 2548: 2303:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2150:

would be at a lower, less precise level. Let it be known that you've done something special and deserve this barnstar!

2527: 2454: 2381: 2308: 2236: 2229: 2214: 2207: 2197: 2568: 52: 221:= http://books.google.com/books?id=_q03AAAAMAAJ&pg=PA127&dq=Charles+Blagden+pere&as_brr=1}}</ref: --> 111:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

522: 29: 1925: 1818: 503: 2503: 2430: 2357: 1795:

article with the c. in the template but as it shows up as an error someone else may come along and change it!

65: 2048: 1956: 1732: