User talk:Popish Plot - Knowledge (XXG)

1080:

other articles you're engaging. Any time you see an editor cite or link to a policy or guideline, please take the time to read those pages thoroughly and give some thought as to their applicability to specific editing issues and interactions. If you dive into complex discussion threads before you can refer to their history, you're not likely to get much reaction from other editors, and other editors won't feel that it's appropriate for them to repeat themselves when a newcomer arrives and has not gotten up to speed on difficult threads. Good luck. It will be worth the effort.

1881:

you see a bad law, break it" although it's not saying the rules are bad, just that in some cases within certain contexts they may not apply. I see it says there is no common sense. I think being polite is common sense but no that's not a rule anyway so ignore all rules wouldn't apply. I do think if I break a rule, please tell me what one, Knowledge (XXG) is good in that it's relatively easy to get links to specific edits and comments.

1779:

libertarian or conservative. I think you may have seen some of that play out at Griffin. Also, just wanted to mention that the sum of an editor's edits doesn't tell you how that editor accumulated their edit count. I saw where Guy asked you if you checked his contribution history. Best way to see what an editor actually contributed in the way of writing prose, and/or creating articles is to go to their user page, and click on

332: 1862:

committee deserve our utmost respect, regardless of the outcome. It is always better to try to work things out and reach a compromise before initiating an ARBCOM but there are occasions when advocacies are pushing a POV so hard they end up being noncompliant with NPOV, therefore violative of BLP policy. Repeated policy violations and over-the-edge behavioral problems are when ARBCOM becomes the only road to resolve.

1518: 2088: 1299:. This is considered an important guideline in Knowledge (XXG). Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! 1197: 251:

warnings (e.g. about Administrative Noticeboards' discussions). That is to say, if you bring a complaint to the noticeboards you are required to alert the involved editor. Other than that it is best to stay off the personal talk pages of those who have stated that an editor's comments are not welcome at their personal pages. As a new editor I thought you should be alerted to this.

1471:

self-sufficient, intelligent people who have grown weary of the ignorance, and have the common sense to know better. Overly zealous political advocates who push their POV on others will wither away, especially those who think they have all the answers and want to impose their beliefs on others while telling them how to live. It's a form of censorship and an enemy to freedom.

1380: 133: 1925: 856:

totalitarianism. Griffin presented his views on the U.S. money system in his 1993 movie and 1994 book on the Federal Reserve System, The Creature from Jekyll Island. The book was a business-topic bestseller. The book also influenced Ron Paul when he wrote a chapter on money and the Federal Reserve in his New York Times bestseller, The Revolution: A Manifesto.

284: 719:

article pass GA criteria by watering down critical responses to his nonsense. Along the way Atsme has proposed a variety of unreliable sources and in several cases has entirely misrepresented what other sources say (e.g. a book by Kissinger called New World Order presented as if it were an endorsement of the

1674:

Oh ok. I think I know what you mean. First thing I learned in wikipedia is if it's in here, it needs a reliable source. Also is it notable? If it's notable, how much weight to give it? How is all this decided if people disagree? Talk it out on the talk page, stay on topic, and try to get a consensus.

1655:

This is the time I'm going to try to help you: Half a dozen experienced editors have advised you that your interactions are not constructive. You should review all your talk page interactions and consider the advice of other editors. This has nothing to do with the issues in any discussion. It has

1622:

Popish, you give editors the same impression on other articles. Nobody else is going to do the work it will take for you to get up to speed on WP. It's great to bring enthusiasm and to want to contribute, but several editors have asked you to review policies, refrain from personal remarks, and read

1229:

Hello, Popish. Atsme has archived my reply to your recent post on her talk page, so I'll paste it here: If you have indeed located "plenty of reliable sources" for comments (pro or con) about the book, then you may propose them and the associated article text on the article talk page. Before you do

795:

Ironic. But I do appreciate the response from Guy. Ok. So atsme wants to make the book about cancer and the book about Jekyl Island as "legitimate scholarship" and they are not? What's up with the current first sentence of the article: "G. Edward Griffin (born November 7, 1931) is an American author,

1746:

Whoa. Ok. This is why I thought you were mad. You do see why if I ask you what the problem is, and you don't say what it is, it's hard to assume good faith? I don't want to disrupt. Ok no more questions. But please see where I found a new source that's related to this Elizabeth Warren topic. I think

1490:

I don't pretend to know all about anything. So I got attracted to Knowledge (XXG) in the first place since it was a collection of knowledge. And they do have the transparent editing system. Is it perfect no but neither is encyclopedia Britannica or something like that. I looked at your essay and was

1152:

Popish, in response to your request that I state all of the issues and WP policies to which I referred you on the Griffin talk page: I don't think that it's likely that I or any other editor will invest the time and effort to bring you up to speed on this. I would like to see you participate and I

1079:

Popish, the fact that various editors have come here, to your talk page, demonstrates our interest in helping you to acclimate yourself to Knowledge (XXG). You're going to have a much quicker and more productive learning curve if you take time to review all the talk page archives on Griffin and any

885:

Edward Flaherty, an academic economist writing for Political Research Associates, characterized Griffin's description of the secret meeting on Jekyll Island as "conspiratorial", "amateurish", and "suspect". Griffin responded that "until specifics are brought to my attention, I stand on everything I

1880:

Thank you, very informative. I didn't know what it meant by "assume good faith is not a suicide pact". Clicked on that and found it was a paraphrase of "ignore all rules". Didn't know what that meant either but I saw on the page there is an explanation. I think it might be similar to the saying "if

1713:

and you immediately returned to the talk page in question and posted yet more derailment. You repeatedly ask the same questions that have already been clearly answered for you by other editors. Experienced editors have explained things to you personally, and provided links that detail the relevant

288:

I just dropped by to say "hi" and maybe welcome you to WP, but I see others have beat me to it. I read your response to me at Griffin, but thought it best to respond to you there just in case you issued a wiki-wide myTPBan (for which there is no such thing). Even if there was, it wouldn't include

1991:

No I have used Knowledge (XXG) for years though and used to lurk. Then I made this official name recently I believe in march 2015. I did have some views about a couple Knowledge (XXG) articles that were controversial, but all I did was go read Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines. I like to use

1107:

Thanks. I did review that talk page and it was a lot of arguing over nothing. So I wanted to just ask you what the problem was and you were non responsive at first which made it hard to assume good faith but then you finally did answer. Truth is I have been lurking wiki for years and just recently

1033:

Not a suicide pact ok but just good advice. If wrong, in what way? Being wrong is not the same as having an agenda. And if entirely sincere, that is opposite of having an agenda right? You had said "Atsme will, of course, reject my reading of her agenda." There is a lot of rude, unecessary insults

718:

as a work of legitimate scholarship, rather than what it actually is, a barely-coherent conspiracist ramble in support of the "hard money" fringe; to represent his self-published books and videos as works of critical scholarship, rather than what they are, conspiracist maunderings; and to make the

677:

No, it's not the reslt of knowledge, it's a result of studiously ignoring those who have sought to explain the problem to you. You've proposed conspiracy crank sites as sources. YOu simply don't understand what a reliable source is, you are weighin them by how well they support your agenda, not by

2015:

I removed your comment on Eric's talk page, and I apologize if that annoys you (it is sort of out-of-order to do so). The problem is, Eric is under a Sword of Damocles regarding gender-related stuff like this, and no matter how he answers you, there are people who would use it as a pretext to go

602:

among editors who don't have a medical or scientific background is that PubMed is a 'source' or publisher; it is not. PubMed is just a really big index (sort of like a library catalog) that collects citation information for a vast amount of science- and medicine-related content from thousands of

1778:

The biggest problem I see with what you're doing is questioning the liberal perspective on the TP of a BLP of an idolized Democrat who believes she has Native American ancestry. Harmless. You would probably get an even worse reception if you tried to add something positive showing support of a

1718:

questions again. As I said earlier, it's insulting to the community of editors as a whole. At this point you are giving quite a few editors the impression you are only here to disrupt the 'pedia and waste our time. Once you've been warned multiple times about disruption, but refuse to change, it

1579:

are making it clear you are not paying attention to the discussion, or simply trolling. The effect is the same. Others are working on improving the article while you keep trying to derail. To badger other editors then suggest they are "mad" and should take a break is a violation of wikiquette. I

488:

Hopefully that's lifted soon but till then I suppose there is no problem with just bringing a source to the talk page to discuss whether it is reliable or not. Some of that discussion I see is about some other sources that people say are no good but what I'm wondering if wikipedia should make it

503:

Actually, we have RS-N (Reliable Sources Noticeboard) for such discussions. I hope you don't mind, but I'm going to add a section to your TP which I hope you'll find helpful. You are asking many of the same questions I've asked in the past, and what many editors still ask and don't understand

250:

FYI: Ordinarily, if an editor states or asks specifically that an editor not comment on his personal talk page, as Arthur Rubin has on his, you should not then continue to post on his or her talk page. It is considered uncivil. There is an exception to this for posting required notifications or

1975:

Popish Plot, I am awed by the panache and speed with which you have figured out the ropes of edition Knowledge (XXG). It almost feels as though you already knew how to do this well from a prior experience with Knowledge (XXG). Did you use to edit under a different name? Or take some sort of

828:

Read these. The first says it is a wild conspiracy theory but the second doesn't. But this is also a discussion of a proposed edit atsme made in a sandbox. Atsme still has this in the draft: However, Sean Easter of Media Matters For America wrote a review that was critical of Beck's interview,

1861:

The hardest part of all is when advocacies get involved to sway consensus, the latter of which happens but is rather difficult to prove and usually ends up at ARBCOM. In closing, ARBCOM is a long and arduous process, and there are no guarantees. Editors who have volunteered to serve on that

1495:

I have been surfing around wikipedia clicking on links that spread out from where this whole controversy started. Lot of interesting debates and arguments going and I bet it won't end here. I think you're right that eventually overzealous folks will wither away. How could conflict of interest

1813:

That's a lot of info, thanks. I can see where something politically related will have a lot of anger involved whether liberals or conservatives. I think Corbie was just having a bad day. It happens. I think Guy wanted me to see he has been here for a long time. I think it's still possible he

855:

Specifico thanks! So maybe the article should be unlocked for just a second to take that out? What about these other sources for the jekyl Island part of the article: "He has opposed the Federal Reserve since the 1960s, saying it constitutes a banking cartel and an instrument of war and

1470:

Maintaining flexibility and an open mind is equally important to achieving success and maintaining it. In fact, it's a key ingredient. Politically based attacks can be overwhelming, especially when you don't care about politics, but I think the former is changing world-wide thanks to

938:

Of course Ron Paul isn't a reliable source for what constitutes a neutral view of economics. And Amazon categorises homeopathy and other quackery under health books: being classified as a business book doesn't make it a business book, still less a reliable or factual book. This is just

1814:

misinterpreted the suicide pact thing though. And assumed bad faith on me by mistake. And specifico assumed bad faith by mistake here but then realized he was wrong so just told me to look at my hsitory. Hard to do if no one tells me what I did wrong so what should I be searching for?

1954:. I still believe in it. My cat was truly a red-headed tempered feline. I took ten days strong antibiotic for a ferocious bite on my hand. My vet called me once to get Fearless out of the cage because she was lashing out at all of them. lol. I wish you happy editing. ツ 893:

19.Jump up ^ "Best-selling business books, April 14". Rocky Mountain News. 2007-04-14. Archived from the original on 2008-09-27. Retrieved 2008-02-29. "10. The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve: G. Edward Griffin. American Media. $ 24.50.

384:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 723:

which Griffin advocates. Atsme is a lovely person and up to now I think a very good editor, but she has acknowledged that she tends to settle on an angle and write from that perspective, and in this case the angle is simply wrong, and she can't seem to let go of it.

1465:

I think you can probably relate to what I'm about to say even if it's irrelevant but maybe not. I think it's sad when an individual thinks they have all the answers, and that their POV is the right one and everyone else is wrong. It's arrogance.

1496:

eventually be solved as a problem? I don't know. That wifone person who ran a school in India got trusted with years of good edits and being polite. What did him in was not lack of reliable sources, it's that he went too far being rude to people.

923:

Is Ron Paul a reliable source? I do think he lies a lot but that is my political opinion. Is it correct to have Griffen's rebuttal to those who said it was it was bad? Also, should this entire discussion be moved to the griffen article talk page?

469:

You will also notice a lock on the article page - top right corner. It means you cannot edit the actual article without first getting consensus on the TP, then requesting the edit be made by an admin or editor who has the tools to do so.

1409: 742:

Moreover, Popish, it is never OK to impugn the motives of other editors. Sooner or later, those who engage in personal attacks on WP end up with sanctions. Even if you see others misbehaving in that way, it is not OK to follow suit.

1415: 1153:

would like the group to have the benefit of any informed views or suggestions you may wish to offer there, however I think it is up to you to invest the time and energy to contribute constructively there. I hope you'll do so.

1675:

I get all this. If you look at my talk history I'm sure you will see me missing this in February and March but I think as of recently it's ok? Right now it would help if you could be more specific about what I'm doing wrong.

1714:

policies. Which you apparently don't bother to read. People have spent their valuable time helping you when that time could have been spent improving the 'pedia. They do all this for you and then you come back and ask the

975:

I will clarify: Atsme will, of course, reject my reading of her agenda. It is, nonetheless, my understanding of what she is trying to do, and I have given extended reasons why this is the impression she gives. If it is

889:

Here, the 2 source is the usa daily one that should be taken out but that was just to say it was a bestseller. Other sources also say that.: 18.Jump up ^ "Bestselling business books". Calgary Herald. 2006-07-04. p.

147:, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the 1422:

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

836:

is not RS as to the statement in the lede and that source should be deleted. If you have some knowledge of USA Daily that you believe proves otherwise, please share it on the article talk page. Thanks.

1828:

It is always wise to self-analyze and make sure your actions are on the correct side of PAGs. Seek a third opinion. We can certainly have different interpretations but when it comes to BLP policy,

1641:

I did read the history of the issue and I don't think asking questions is against policies? I don't think the issue has been previously worked out, or why is it a dispute and doesn't have consensus?

1604:

Why do you think that is trolling, or off topic, or a disruptive edit? I haven't edited the article and have just posted on talk page and on this specific topic, and it doesn't have consensus yet.

561:, specifically the NOTES section at the bottom of the article. I tend to think the latter is often overlooked, even by a few of our veteran editors, perhaps by design, but it is always best to 1787:. Click on Edit Count. At that page you will see graphs, and a detailed summary of what kinds of articles, edits, etc. For example, you get the following page after clicking on Edit Count: 198:. If you do that, other users will almost never hold the "struck" comment against you, and the conversation will remain intelligible. Arthur was probably confused because nat all the comments 998:

I think you should assume good faith unless you have specific proof of an agenda here. How can the article be improved? Specifico just showed me it has a non reliable source in it right now.

1709:

No, it's not OK. It's not OK at all. You have already been provided with specifics, and you have just ignored them. Multiple editors have cautioned you about this just in the past few days.

1352:

Well you'd think a Borg would not be so verbose but I remember the borg queen had a lot to say and not to mention 7 of 9 although at that point she was embracing her humanity a lot more! :)

1267:

I'm not sure what Guy meant I looked thru the talk history and saw talk of different forbes articles. Anyway, this is 2015, you'd think we'd be past the old saying a blog is no good excuse.

342: 139:. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at 1048:

Being wrong is allowed. Being wrong, admitting you were wrong, and then coming back and reasserting your wrongness, repeatedly and determinedly, is more of a problem. You might want to

1384: 136: 1623:

the history of discussions and the various views and concerns that have previously been worked through on the pages you want to edit. There's no way around it, really.

350: 1320:

Thanks for the good tip, I see why that is important. I have been trying to make a comment on the talk page to say what the dit was but that is not as clear is it?

642:. (Of course, a source can be reliable for a particular claim and yet still be omitted from an article for reasons of (ir)relevance, undue weight, or to avoid 1790:

You can click on Articles created to find out how many articles that editor created, etc. You can find out more detailed information clicking on the articles

630:. This board cannot provide a blanket approval that a source is reliable for all purposes. Some of the most important guidelines for evaluating the use of 796:

lecturer, and filmmaker. He is the author of The Creature from Jekyll Island (1994), which promotes conspiracy theories about the Federal Reserve System.

1783:

in the left margin. At the top of the page you will see (talk | block log | uploads | logs | filter log). At the bottom of the page you will see

1719:

doesn't matter what your intent is. And if you respond to this with "what's disruption?" someone is going to block you, sooner rather than later. -

943:, basically, and it's done because the vast majority of reliable independent sources completely ignore Griffin, because he is so obviously a crank. 55: 1840: 1468:“A solid answer to everything is not necessary. Blurry concepts influence one to focus, but postulated clarity influences arrogance.” ~Criss Jami 79: 86: 346: 365: 1526: 1492: 714:

as something other than what it is - a book promoting the worst fraud ever perpetrated on American cancer victims; to represent his book

1414: 1408: 821: 1340: 1305: 720: 39: 1534: 373: 183: 144: 825: 1230:

so, please check whatever you find against proposals, e.g. the Forbes blog piece, that have already been proposed and rejected.

69: 619:

A second common misconception is that a source can be declared "reliable", and that declaration is a fixed, absolute judgement.

405: 356:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

557:, is the result of knowledge I acquired after quizzing admins, reading questions and results at RSN, and thoroughly reviewing 74: 603:

different journals. of this material is of high quality, some...not so much. For instance, the first "PubMed" link above (

1854:

can also be in violation of BLP policy or the results can be unclear or nonspecific enough that it requires a decision from

466: 2016:

after him. It's not really fair to say things on his page that he can get in trouble for answering. Hope you understand. --

581:. New editors eventually come to realize that 3RR, ARB DS, and BLP violations are at the top of the list of priorities. 369: 381: 202:

were added by your logged-in username; another good reason to always log in if you can remember. Thanks, and welcome!

1530: 377: 361: 60: 46: 651: 1785:

Subpages User rights Edit count Edit summary search Articles created Global contributions / log SUL / accounts

1960: 1108:

decided to make a username and edit so I am aware of the rules. One of them being that you should be civil.

256: 163:

The truth is I deleted one of my own comments on that talk page which was out of line and that I regretted!

1392: 93: 1951: 155: 118: 1851: 1391:

and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to

1388: 105: 2050: 2021: 1981: 1522: 1174:

It's ok I figured it out, angry pov pushers, not wanting to discuss because they knew they were wrong.

980:

her intention, then she is doing something very badly wrong, because that's exactly how it looks to me.

409: 97: 357: 179: 886:

have written. ... There is nothing about my work that merits being classified as a conspiracy theory."

386:

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

42:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: 207: 50: 1334:

Indeed, just something to indicate what the edit is about. No need to be as verbose as I am though.

148: 1664: 1631: 1238: 1161: 1088: 845: 751: 647: 584:

Another excellent explanation in less complex terms that helped me grasp the proper application of

401: 222:

Yes one thing I keep forgetting is four tildes to put my name down. I see why that is a key thing.

1855: 1734: 1595: 1552: 822:

http://mediamatters.org/research/2011/03/26/who-is-g-edward-griffin-becks-expert-on-the-fed/177986

1955: 1720: 1581: 1538: 1015:

is not a suicide pact. And actually I believe that Atsme is entirely sincere - just badly wrong.

696:

I do think once someone resorts to insults, they have been proven wrong. What is atsme's agenda?

419:

sounds like basically, don't mess around, don't go editing without reliable sources. Understood.

252: 639: 2223: 1832:

One of the policies I find rather confusing and possibly even at the root of many a dispute is

1656:

to do with your approach, style, and efforts to collaborate as a productive contributor here.

1525:

for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article;

1493:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_Interest_ducks

489:

clearer on what makes a source reliable. I think a lot of times it's too confusing on purpose.

104:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 1794:. There's lots to learn by navigating the left margin and bottom margin of a page. Have fun!!! 1431: 1292: 1122:

Guy, wrong in what way? I'm trying to steer you away from generalities and towards specifics.

826:

http://web.archive.org/web/20071016170111/http://www.usadaily.com//article.cfm?articleID=63368

565:. I also believe it is very important for new editors to acquire a thorough understanding of 391: 360:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

152: 140: 115: 114:

to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —

570: 2189: 2060: 2046: 2032: 2017: 1993: 1977: 1899: 1882: 1815: 1748: 1676: 1642: 1605: 1562: 1497: 1444: 1353: 1335: 1321: 1300: 1268: 1175: 1123: 1109: 1035: 999: 925: 697: 523: 490: 452: 420: 308: 266: 223: 164: 17: 1920: 1833: 1012: 940: 589: 578: 566: 562: 2205: 2169: 1992:

common sense though, and check those reliable sources. I think that is the best approach.

1936: 1871: 1803: 1480: 1258: 1214: 777: 667: 513: 479: 442: 298: 203: 1850:

anymore. Also keep in mind that there are instances, although rare, when the results of

585: 2242: 1657: 1624: 1231: 1154: 1081: 838: 744: 396: 2246: 2025: 1406:

With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (

574: 558: 331: 196:

Sorry, I've reconsidered the above comment and no longer stand behind it. Edited ~~~~~

89:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge (XXG). 1060: 1054: 1023: 1017: 988: 982: 951: 945: 732: 726: 686: 680: 1924: 1788: 1427: 829:

stating "Griffin has an extensive history of promoting wild conspiracy theories.""

65: 2140:

What's especially nice about the digitized version is that it doesn't need water,

2087: 1517: 646:

conclusions not actually supported. The greater context of the article matters.)

1837: 1467: 1196: 2201: 2188:

yeah wiki is no good but I checked in today just to say merry xmas to you. :)

2165: 1929: 1895: 1864: 1796: 1473: 1251: 1207: 770: 660: 604: 506: 472: 435: 291: 2238: 2068: 2054: 2040: 2001: 1985: 1965: 1940: 1907: 1890: 1875: 1823: 1807: 1756: 1737: 1684: 1669: 1650: 1636: 1613: 1598: 1570: 1555: 1505: 1484: 1452: 1435: 1361: 1347: 1329: 1312: 1276: 1262: 1243: 1218: 1183: 1166: 1131: 1117: 1093: 1065: 1043: 1028: 1007: 993: 956: 933: 850: 781: 756: 737: 705: 691: 671: 531: 517: 498: 483: 460: 446: 428: 413: 316: 302: 274: 260: 231: 211: 172: 158: 121: 25: 1529:. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting 1379: 132: 186:. That policy says that, in your situation, it's best to put <s: --> 2179: 569:

which also relies on strict adherence to the 3 core content policies,

2222: 1203:

Imagine this little kitten purring beside you. Happy thoughts!

151:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —

178:

That's totally fine; we appreciate your reconsideration. The above

1400: 607:) is just a pointer to a catalog entry for a 2003 paper by Fukuda 101: 38:

Hello, Popish Plot, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for

1846:

The problem I see with it is the fact that common sense isn't so

289:

me though, would it? New editors are such fun. Happy editing!

768:

Really, SPECIFICO? And pray tell, what did Guy just do to me?

1443:

Oh man thanks Sinebot why do I keep forgetting that!!! Sorry!

349:, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is 182:

was not very useful, then: Arthur shuold have pointed you to

1747:

it helps support your view. Please see it on the talk page.

1533:

and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See

1195: 1859: 1577: 1049: 593: 555: 280:

My, my Popish - you certainly are off to a good start.

199: 110: 1034:

going. Let's go back to just discussing the article.

622:

Reliability depends both on the source itself and on

1839:a widely accepted standard that all editors should 1249:What "blog post" in Forbes, and who rejected it? 184:Knowledge (XXG):Talk page guidelines#Own comments 1858:, the latter of which is evidenced at Griffin. 1291:I have noticed that you often edit without an 1052:, I am not exactly inexperienced in disputes. 433:Callan has also placed the article under PP. 372:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 597: 8: 265:Please don't post on my user talk page. :) 194:around whatever you'd like to add, such as 325:Discretionary sanctions notification - CAM 1395:. There are two ways to do this. Either: 550:A few administrator interpretations of RS 341:The Arbitration Committee has authorised 2086: 2079:I was wondering what you've been up to!! 613:Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin 588:was provided to me earlier this year at 2156:...and a prosperous New Year!! 🍸🎁 🎉 2154:Wishing you a joyous holiday season... 1403:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or 338:Please carefully read this information: 710:To represent G. Edward Griffin's book 467:Knowledge (XXG):Protection_policy#full 347:Complementary and Alternative Medicine 1521:Please stop using talk pages such as 595:(my bold and underline for emphasis) 281: 7: 2199:I'm honored, and very appreciative. 2031:ummmmm yikes. Rethink that please. 1976:how-to-edit Knowledge (XXG) course? 1580:strongly suggest you stop this. - 1537:for more information. Thank you. - 1527:not for use as a forum or chat room 61:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 1830:strict adherence is a requirement. 188:around the comments you'd like to 14: 1576:You're still doing it. Your edits 721:New World Order conspiracy theory 2059:Ummmm reread your post. Or not. 1923: 1516: 1491:surprised to see so much anger. 1418:) located above the edit window. 1413: 1407: 1378: 1297:always fill in the summary field 330: 282: 131: 75:How to create your first article 1726: 1724: 1711:I warned you three times today, 1587: 1585: 1544: 1542: 716:The Creature From Jekyll Island 554:What I posted on Griffin Talk, 345:to be used for pages regarding 56:Contributing to Knowledge (XXG) 2127:I decorated a special kind of 654:) 00:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 390:Referring specifically to the 85:You may also want to take the 1: 2247:16:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC) 2206:20:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC) 2170:20:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC) 2078: 1937: 1872: 1804: 1481: 1259: 1215: 778: 668: 514: 480: 443: 299: 232:13:51, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 212:11:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 108:, ask me on my talk page, or 2136:in the spirit of the season. 1933: 1868: 1800: 1477: 1255: 1211: 820:This has two sources. This: 774: 664: 510: 476: 439: 295: 275:16:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC) 261:16:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC) 173:20:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC) 159:02:07, 29 January 2015 (UTC) 122:02:07, 29 January 2015 (UTC) 26:22:43, 26 January 2015 (UTC) 2069:17:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC) 2055:17:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC) 2041:17:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC) 2026:15:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC) 2008:Comment on Eric's talk page 1950:Hi, I have answered now at 1898:What does "PAGs" refer to? 1836:. The policy claims it is 2262: 1941:20:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC) 1908:20:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC) 1891:17:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC) 1876:17:02, 15 April 2015 (UTC) 1824:14:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC) 1808:04:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC) 1757:23:22, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1738:23:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1685:22:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1670:22:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1651:22:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1637:22:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1614:19:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1599:19:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1571:19:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1556:19:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1506:12:38, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1485:05:37, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 1453:19:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC) 1436:19:58, 31 March 2015 (UTC) 1387:. When you add content to 1385:welcome to Knowledge (XXG) 1362:17:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC) 1348:17:48, 30 March 2015 (UTC) 1330:17:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC) 1313:16:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC) 1277:13:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC) 1263:07:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC) 1244:21:43, 27 March 2015 (UTC) 1219:03:43, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1184:01:28, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 1167:20:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 1132:03:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1118:03:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1094:23:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 1066:22:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 1044:18:51, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 1029:18:28, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 1008:17:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 994:16:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 957:22:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 934:16:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 851:15:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 782:14:17, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 757:13:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 738:08:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 706:01:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 692:00:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 672:17:29, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 592:by admin TenOfAllTrades. 532:01:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC) 518:16:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 499:14:46, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 484:21:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC) 461:19:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC) 447:17:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC) 429:02:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC) 414:00:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC) 362:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 317:02:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC) 307:pleased to meet you Atsme 303:22:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC) 137:Welcome to Knowledge (XXG) 80:Simplified Manual of Style 2216: 2085: 2007: 2002:12:58, 15 June 2015 (UTC) 1986:12:08, 14 June 2015 (UTC) 1295:. Please do your best to 832:That second citation, to 600:A common misunderstanding 192:, and then put <u: --> 106:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 87:Knowledge (XXG) Adventure 2193: 2143:and it won't catch fire. 2094:(Spirobranchus gigantic) 2064: 2036: 1997: 1903: 1886: 1819: 1752: 1680: 1646: 1609: 1566: 1501: 1448: 1357: 1325: 1272: 1179: 1127: 1113: 1039: 1003: 929: 701: 611:published originally in 527: 494: 456: 424: 312: 270: 227: 190:strike out of the record 168: 21: 1966:16:12, 1 May 2015 (UTC) 343:discretionary sanctions 70:How to develop articles 2229: 2225:File:Xmas Ornament.jpg 2097: 1952:talk:Tortoiseshell cat 1200: 656: 2228: 2092:Christmas tree worm, 2090: 1523:Talk:Elizabeth Warren 1199: 366:standards of behavior 2045:What do you mean? -- 712:World Without Cancer 374:editing restrictions 246:Note to a new editor 2104:Time To Spread Some 590:Knowledge (XXG):RSN 92:Please remember to 2230: 2218:Season's Greetings 2172: 2157: 2146: 2098: 2096: 1971:A remarkable debut 1781:user contributions 1531:our reference desk 1201: 66:How to edit a page 40:your contributions 2234:To You and Yours! 2185: 2184: 2181: 2177:Pure pun-ishment. 2163: 2153: 2125: 2091: 1374:Your recent edits 1344: 1309: 1192:A kitten for you! 1064: 1027: 992: 955: 736: 690: 658:Hope this helps. 392:G. Edward Griffin 141:Talk:Circumcision 96:your messages on 2253: 2226: 2204: 2175: 2168: 2134: 2131: 2119: 2114: 2109: 2083: 2082: 1938: 1935: 1932: 1927: 1873: 1870: 1867: 1845: 1805: 1802: 1799: 1792:page information 1732: 1730: 1728: 1662: 1629: 1593: 1591: 1589: 1550: 1548: 1546: 1520: 1482: 1479: 1476: 1469: 1417: 1411: 1382: 1342: 1307: 1260: 1257: 1254: 1236: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1159: 1086: 1058: 1021: 986: 949: 843: 779: 776: 773: 749: 730: 684: 678:actual quality. 669: 666: 663: 638:can be found in 632:specific sources 515: 512: 509: 481: 478: 475: 444: 441: 438: 334: 300: 297: 294: 287: 286: 285: 143:, is considered 135: 113: 2261: 2260: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2224: 2221: 2200: 2164: 2132: 2129: 2117: 2112: 2107: 2081: 2010: 1973: 1948: 1928: 1863: 1795: 1721: 1658: 1625: 1582: 1539: 1514: 1472: 1463: 1461:Just saying.... 1393:sign your posts 1376: 1287: 1250: 1232: 1227: 1206: 1194: 1155: 1150: 1082: 839: 769: 745: 659: 636:specific claims 552: 505: 471: 434: 388: 387: 335: 327: 290: 283: 248: 129: 109: 100:by typing four 51:Getting started 36: 12: 11: 5: 2259: 2257: 2237: 2220: 2215: 2213: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2183: 2182: 2173: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2155: 2150: 2149: 2141: 2138: 2122: 2121: 2100: 2099: 2080: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2009: 2006: 2005: 2004: 1972: 1969: 1947: 1944: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1617: 1616: 1574: 1573: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1462: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1420: 1419: 1404: 1375: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1290: 1286: 1285:Edit summaries 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1226: 1225:RS for Griffin 1223: 1221: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 891: 887: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 648:TenOfAllTrades 626:how it is used 616: 551: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 368:, or relevant 336: 329: 328: 326: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 247: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 128: 125: 83: 82: 77: 72: 63: 58: 53: 35: 32: 30: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2258: 2249: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2235: 2227: 2219: 2214: 2207: 2203: 2198: 2197: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2186: 2180: 2178: 2174: 2171: 2167: 2162: 2161: 2152: 2151: 2148: 2145: 2142: 2137: 2135: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2115: 2110: 2105: 2102: 2101: 2095: 2089: 2084: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2013: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1970: 1968: 1967: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1958: 1957:Fylbecatulous 1953: 1945: 1943: 1942: 1939: 1931: 1926: 1922: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1874: 1866: 1860: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1844: 1842: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1806: 1798: 1793: 1789: 1786: 1782: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1736: 1733: 1731: 1717: 1712: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1668: 1667: 1663: 1661: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1635: 1634: 1630: 1628: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1597: 1594: 1592: 1578: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1554: 1551: 1549: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1519: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1494: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1483: 1475: 1460: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1426:Thank you. -- 1424: 1416: 1410: 1405: 1402: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1381: 1373: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1339: 1338: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1311: 1310: 1304: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1284: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1235: 1224: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1209: 1204: 1198: 1191: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1158: 1147: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1085: 1067: 1062: 1057: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1019: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 996: 995: 990: 985: 984: 979: 974: 958: 953: 948: 947: 942: 937: 936: 935: 931: 927: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 892: 888: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 854: 853: 852: 849: 848: 844: 842: 835: 831: 830: 827: 823: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 780: 772: 758: 755: 754: 750: 748: 741: 740: 739: 734: 729: 728: 722: 717: 713: 709: 708: 707: 703: 699: 695: 694: 693: 688: 683: 682: 676: 675: 674: 673: 670: 662: 655: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 628: 627: 621: 620: 614: 610: 606: 601: 596: 594: 591: 587: 582: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 549: 533: 529: 525: 521: 520: 519: 516: 508: 502: 501: 500: 496: 492: 487: 486: 485: 482: 474: 468: 464: 463: 462: 458: 454: 450: 449: 448: 445: 437: 432: 431: 430: 426: 422: 418: 417: 416: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 398: 393: 385: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 354: 352: 348: 344: 339: 333: 324: 318: 314: 310: 306: 305: 304: 301: 293: 279: 278: 277: 276: 272: 268: 263: 262: 258: 254: 253:Capitalismojo 245: 233: 229: 225: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 191: 185: 181: 177: 176: 175: 174: 170: 166: 161: 160: 157: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 126: 124: 123: 120: 117: 112: 107: 103: 99: 95: 90: 88: 81: 78: 76: 73: 71: 67: 64: 62: 59: 57: 54: 52: 48: 45: 44: 43: 41: 33: 31: 28: 27: 23: 19: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2217: 2212: 2176: 2147: 2144: 2139: 2128: 2126: 2116: 2111: 2106: 2103: 2093: 2014: 2011: 1974: 1961: 1956: 1949: 1918: 1852:WP:CONSENSUS 1847: 1838: 1829: 1791: 1784: 1780: 1777: 1722: 1715: 1710: 1665: 1659: 1632: 1626: 1583: 1575: 1540: 1515: 1464: 1425: 1421: 1377: 1341: 1336: 1306: 1301: 1296: 1293:edit summary 1289:Popish Plot, 1288: 1239: 1233: 1228: 1205: 1202: 1162: 1156: 1151: 1089: 1083: 1078: 1053: 1016: 981: 977: 944: 846: 840: 833: 807: 767: 752: 746: 725: 715: 711: 679: 657: 643: 635: 631: 625: 624: 623: 618: 617: 612: 608: 599: 598: 583: 553: 451:what's that? 395: 389: 355: 340: 337: 264: 249: 195: 193:…</u: --> 189: 187:…</s: --> 162: 153:Arthur Rubin 149:welcome page 145:bad practice 130: 127:January 2015 116:Arthur Rubin 91: 84: 47:Introduction 37: 29: 15: 2190:Popish Plot 2061:Popish Plot 2047:Floquenbeam 2033:Popish Plot 2018:Floquenbeam 1994:Popish Plot 1978:E.M.Gregory 1946:"Tortitude" 1900:Popish Plot 1883:Popish Plot 1816:Popish Plot 1749:Popish Plot 1677:Popish Plot 1643:Popish Plot 1606:Popish Plot 1563:Popish Plot 1498:Popish Plot 1445:Popish Plot 1354:Popish Plot 1322:Popish Plot 1269:Popish Plot 1176:Popish Plot 1124:Popish Plot 1110:Popish Plot 1036:Popish Plot 1000:Popish Plot 926:Popish Plot 698:Popish Plot 634:to support 524:Popish Plot 491:Popish Plot 453:Popish Plot 421:Popish Plot 309:Popish Plot 267:Popish Plot 224:Popish Plot 200:you removed 180:WP:Template 165:Popish Plot 18:Popish Plot 2239:FWiW Bzuk 1512:April 2015 1389:talk pages 1383:Hello and 1050:start here 824:and this: 567:BLP policy 358:uninvolved 204:FourViolas 111:click here 98:talk pages 2130:Christmas 1660:SPECIFICO 1627:SPECIFICO 1561:Ok sorry. 1399:Add four 1234:SPECIFICO 1157:SPECIFICO 1084:SPECIFICO 841:SPECIFICO 834:USA Daily 747:SPECIFICO 397:Callanecc 394:article. 1841:normally 644:implying 640:WP:MEDRS 605:this one 504:today. 406:contribs 370:policies 34:Welcome! 2118:Cheer!! 2113:Holiday 2012:Hi PP, 1843:follow. 1428:SineBot 1148:Griffin 571:WP:NPOV 522:Thanks! 1921:WP:PAG 1856:ARBCOM 1848:common 1834:WP:IAR 1401:tildes 1013:WP:AGF 941:WP:SYN 609:et al. 579:WP:NOR 563:WP:AGF 382:blocks 364:, our 156:(talk) 119:(talk) 102:tildes 16:Hello 2202:Atsme 2166:Atsme 2108:Happy 1930:Atsme 1896:Atsme 1865:Atsme 1797:Atsme 1474:Atsme 1252:Atsme 1208:Atsme 1061:Help! 1024:Help! 989:Help! 952:Help! 771:Atsme 733:Help! 687:Help! 661:Atsme 586:WP:RS 507:Atsme 473:Atsme 436:Atsme 380:, or 292:Atsme 2243:talk 2194:talk 2133:tree 2065:talk 2051:talk 2037:talk 2022:talk 1998:talk 1982:talk 1962:talk 1919:See 1904:talk 1887:talk 1820:talk 1753:talk 1716:same 1681:talk 1666:talk 1647:talk 1633:talk 1610:talk 1567:talk 1535:here 1502:talk 1449:talk 1432:talk 1358:talk 1326:talk 1273:talk 1240:talk 1180:talk 1163:talk 1128:talk 1114:talk 1090:talk 1040:talk 1004:talk 930:talk 894:..." 847:talk 753:talk 702:talk 652:talk 577:and 575:WP:V 559:WP:V 528:talk 495:talk 465:See 457:talk 425:talk 410:logs 402:talk 378:bans 351:here 313:talk 271:talk 257:talk 228:talk 208:talk 169:talk 94:sign 68:and 49:and 22:talk 1412:or 1337:220 1302:220 1055:Guy 1018:Guy 983:Guy 978:not 946:Guy 890:F5. 727:Guy 681:Guy 2245:) 2196:) 2067:) 2053:) 2039:) 2024:) 2000:) 1984:) 1906:) 1889:) 1822:) 1755:) 1727:ie 1725:rb 1723:Co 1683:) 1649:) 1612:) 1588:ie 1586:rb 1584:Co 1569:) 1545:ie 1543:rb 1541:Co 1504:) 1451:) 1434:) 1360:) 1343:of 1328:) 1308:of 1275:) 1182:) 1130:) 1116:) 1042:) 1006:) 932:) 808:" 704:) 573:, 530:) 497:) 459:) 427:) 412:) 408:• 404:• 376:, 353:. 315:) 273:) 259:) 230:) 210:) 171:) 24:) 2241:( 2192:( 2063:( 2049:( 2035:( 2020:( 1996:( 1980:( 1934:☯ 1902:( 1885:( 1869:☯ 1818:( 1801:☯ 1751:( 1735:☼ 1729:V 1679:( 1645:( 1608:( 1596:☼ 1590:V 1565:( 1553:☼ 1547:V 1500:( 1478:☯ 1447:( 1430:( 1356:( 1324:( 1271:( 1256:☯ 1212:☯ 1178:( 1126:( 1112:( 1063:) 1059:( 1038:( 1026:) 1022:( 1002:( 991:) 987:( 954:) 950:( 928:( 775:☯ 735:) 731:( 700:( 689:) 685:( 665:☯ 650:( 615:. 526:( 511:☯ 493:( 477:☯ 455:( 440:☯ 423:( 400:( 311:( 296:☯ 269:( 255:( 226:( 206:( 167:( 20:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index