1088:
the
Participant list is to function as a resource for other editors wishing to get in contact with wine project members for comments or question on Knowledge (XXG)'s wine article. The goal of this process is to try and maintain the Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wine/Participants as current and up to date as possible with active and contributing members. Please note that this is not intended to be a negative reflection on your Knowledge (XXG) or wine related contribution and it is well known that sometimes outside life can take editors away from Knowledge (XXG) for some time. You will always be welcomed to rejoined the Wine Project should you feel that the time is right. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk or on the Wine Project talk page. Best wishes.
1393:, which advocates that Oxford was the son of Queen Elizabeth, that he later had an affair with her years later and conceived the Earl of Southampton, to whom he then wrote the sonnets that ostensibly suggest a homosexual relationship, is currently the hottest Oxfordian theory and is gaining more and more support. (Of course all that has to be decoded using the right key.) How do you write about that with a straight face? Just stating its ridiculousness is branded as "insulting" by true believers, as I'm sure you've learned by now. In any case, we honestly tried to present the topic as neutrally as possible, and if you find any transgressions don't hesitate to bring them up or change them. We've both been a lot looser about it than we've been made out to be.
1444:
researchers rarely bring this stuff up. The Prince Tudor theory is in the similar vein. sure, it makes for a great movie, but I rarely see it used as any kind of major evidence. Here is the Oxford section that reflects the main arguments, and also reflects the kind of evidence that is most often quoted in RS material like
Atlantic Monthly, Harpers, NY Times, etc, as well as Anderson, the most recent published Oxfordian:(Also note how much shorter this is than the present version. All that code and Prince Tudor detail belongs in the Oxfordian Theory article, as the editors note clearly says, not the general SAQ article. That is why the charge at ArbCom that the material has been formulated to make the case look ridiculous and unsupported.)
1502:. To quote Parity policy: "For example, the Apollo moon landing hoax accusations article may include material from reliable websites, movies, television specials, and books that are not peer reviewed. By parity of sources critiques of that material can likewise be gleaned from reliable websites and books that are not peer reviewed." (This would include the Kathman/Ross/Reedy blog material that is not peer reviewed, but is used in the article.)
1240:
total of eight months. I pointed to my newness when I divulged personal information on Paul's talkpage the first two days I was an editor and knew nothing at all about
Knowledge (XXG) (I thought it was kind of a newsgroup). To compare my ignorance at two days with hers at eight months was what I found "more than a bit ludicrous", especially since she's been directed many times to the proper policy and guideline pages.
1976:"Had the truth been anything like the story that Mr. Ogburn has sketched, the greatest problem would be to unravel the conspiracy of silence that thus far kept it from coming out. It would have to be taken for granted that Jonson and other literary men, along with Shakespeare's fellow actors and editors, and all who were aware of the glamorous mystery, had to be bribed or browbeaten into covering it up.
955:
828:
1411:
Smatprt and Nina think that the Prince Tudor theory is nonsense (I'm not sure - would like to check this) and would not want to be associated with it. And the whole history section seems to focus on the silliest aspects, almost as a source of amusement. I think part of the problem is that the
Oxfordian arguments presented on the page come not from Oxfordians, but through
709:
605:
469:
332:
1763:
personal bible, which
Oxfordians believe correspond to quotations in Shakespeare's plays. Confronting the issue of Oxford's death in 1604, Oxfordian researchers cite examples they say imply the writer known as "Shakespeare" or "Shake-speare" died before 1609, and point to 1604 as the year regular publication of "new" or "augmented" Shakespeare plays stopped.
1487:
personal bible, which
Oxfordians believe correspond to quotations in Shakespeare's plays. Confronting the issue of Oxford's death in 1604, Oxfordian researchers cite examples they say imply the writer known as "Shakespeare" or "Shake-speare" died before 1609, and point to 1604 as the year regular publication of "new" or "augmented" Shakespeare plays stopped.
2010:
Constitutional rights and deficit reduction bills and employment bills whose main purpose is to actually cut taxes. Ogburn's would be named the No
Conspiracy Needed Act, and it would redefine the word to exempt any gigantic secretive government scheme that required no records to be kept with everything communicated orally.
1759:
England|Queen
Elizabeth I]] and the [[Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton|Earl of Southampton]], his knowledge of Court life, his extensive education, his academic and cultural achievements, and his wide-ranging travels through France and Italy to what would later become the locations of many of Shakespeare's plays.
1748:
approach to new information or neglected information. For some reason, I have been accused of violations about the
Knowledge (XXG) policies, by an opposing thinker, and may not be able to contribute any further. So here you go. It is straight-forward, simple, and non ideological. with best wishes, --Zweigenbaum
1244:
to explain). I know it might seem disingenuous to those on the other side of this dispute, but the only agenda I'm pushing here is adherence to
Knowledge (XXG) policies, just as my advocacy for Shakespeare is based more on adherence to scholarly standards than championing one person over another as the -: -->
1541:
Hi Smatprt, thanks for your various comments above. To be honest, I am not that fascinated by the subject and I dont have much time to get in touch ex-wiki by email. Besides, there is a danger this could be seen by some as an attempt to circuit your ban (by feeding info to me which I would then feed
1486:
The case for Oxford's authorship is also based on perceived similarities between Oxford's biography and events in Shakespeare's plays, sonnets and longer poems; parallels of language, idiom, and thought between Oxford's personal letters and the Shakespearean canon; and underlined passages in Oxford's
1415:
stratfordians - you/Nishi interpreting Shapiro/Wadsworth. It would be fairer if Oxfordian editors were to write most of that section, and cite their own sources (which of course you regard as not reliable). If the whole subject is as completely ridiculous as you claim, why do intelligent people like
1410:
Well, yes, I know, but there is an impression that some parts of the page are written in such a way as to make the anti-strat position look as ridiculous as possible. One example is the way the Oxford section of the page runs smoothly into the Prince Tudor theory. Now I would assume that people like
1958:
Have you even read Ogburn? See page 239, for just one small example: "What seems to me self-evident is this: that either the manuscripts were deliberately destroyed to remove incriminating evidence or they were deliberately concealed. evidently with consummate thoroughness. All things considered, it
1762:
The case for Oxford's authorship is also based on perceived similarities between Oxford's biography and events in Shakespeare's plays, sonnets and longer poems; parallels of language, idiom, and thought between Oxford' personal letters and the Shakespearean canon; and underlined passages in Oxford's
1963:
article: "The alternative to the untenable orthodox view is that the manuscripts were a 'hot' property and not to be shown, even to a printer. Presumably this was because of the light they would throw on the authorship ... Could they be disposed of so that they would not be found until the existing
1827:
Note that I do truly appreciate your contributions on the article (although based on your comments to others I doubt whether you believe that), so the above is only intended as the gentlest possible advice on how to make those contributions as helpful, constructive, and effective as possible. There
1819:
think it comes across as non-NPOV or sneering (or whatever the issue may be); and it is ok to state this opinion and see if others agree. But you're now well past that point and the constant repetition of it is 1) not helping, 2) very unlikely to achieve what you want it to achieve, 3) comes across
1243:
Anyhow, this stuff gets all tangled up and people talk about things that are completely missed by the other party, which is then used to argue that they're deliberately being deceptive. I don't think that is the case with you, because you're not pushing an agenda (which I why I took the time to try
2009:
That you take those statements at face value demonstrates that Ogburn would have been an excellent U.S. congressman. They routinely introduce bills with deceptive names that state the very opposite of their content, such as bills with ostensibly anti-terrorist names that actually reduce individual
1277:
No problem, P. I think it had something to do with Paul stashing an identity in his archive. How that is "outing" I don't know, and don't really care at this point, as it appears that my first impression that Knowledge (XXG) was a newsgroup seems to have been more correct than I suspected! Cheers!
1087:
This is a friendly note to let you know that you have been moved to the Inactive members page of the Wine Project. Users are moved to this page when two months have passed without any Knowledge (XXG) activity or 3 months have passed without any contribution to a wine related article. The intent of
1069:
Apologies to everyone for this notification being sent out so late, events in real life prevented me from distributing it at the time, and the Wine Project's had a bit of a lull during the Northern Hemsiphere summer. But as the nights draw in, activity should pick up again, and hopefully the next
1973:
However, he is being more than disingenuous here, and in fact Ogburn claims conspiracies existed at every level, from the street to the highest levels of government, while simultaneously denying that there were none. That he does not come right out and use the word is beside the point. See Gwynne
1835:
guideline is, I believe, a truly helpful tool in so many ways. If you feel that the article is “wrong” and that you're not being heard by the other editors, please do try to ascribe it to a genuine and honest difference of opinion, rather than malice and entrenched bias, and I think you will find
1758:
Oxfordians point to the acclaim of Oxford's contemporaries regarding his talent as a poet and a playwright, his reputation as a hidden poet, and his personal connections to London theatre and the contemporary playwrights of Shakespeare's day. They also note his relationships with[[Elizabeth I of
1443:
I do believe that much of this section has been inserted to make the case look weak. The code/cypher stuff is rarely if ever mentioned as a major argument of the Oxfordian side. Of course, there are extremeists on every issue and some of them see hidden coeds everywhere, but the major writers and
206:
Hi, Poujeaux. I just wanted to make sure you didn't read my replies in a 'biting your head off' manner. That was most definetly not intended. In any case, I think your change is still there. I am in no hurry changing it back, as none of the other editors seem to care strongly enough to comment or
1782:
Thanks, I did see it. It looks fine to me but the problem is, they will never accept a complete re-write, especially coming from you. Your approach is wrong - you should be trying to make minor tweaks to the existing text to improve the article. Sorry to see you banned but you were asing for it.
1239:
I'm confused about your reference here: "Last point - OK for the May incident but what about the July one?" And on the outing thing, I wasn't referring to her attempt to get Nishidani to divulge his identity, just the excuse as a new editor ignorant of policies after being here since May 2010, a
156:
Poujeaux, I got around to looking at P's CV, and I think I see the confusion is coming from. There is indeed an unpublished paper entitled "Naturalism Defeated" (the pdf link we've got), but there's also a much earlier paper entitled, iirc, "An Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism" that was
1747:
Dear Sir, I don't know if you have read this, in the squabbling about whether it or any change is appropriate at the SAQ website page. I am sending it in case you have not. I found that the editors read only as much as they can tolerate and then start attacking. This is an unhealthy defensive
252:
are in my view both valid, but pretty necessary. However altough this has something to do with p(No God) it has nothing to do with the validity of the "747 gambit" Even if you agree with the conclusion that p(No God) is very high, I genunely can't see how you, or Dawkins, or anyone else, can
1994:
He discusses the issue on p 182-3: "The case for Oxford does not assume a conspiracy". "No conspiracy would be required under an autocratic government with the means of enforcing its will in such a matter". Your last examples just prove my point - the word is generally used as an attempt to
1474:
Oxfordians point to the acclaim of Oxford's contemporaries regarding his talent as a poet and a playwright, his reputation as a concealed poet, and his personal connections to London theatre and the contemporary playwrights of Shakespeare's day. They also note his long-term relationships with
1836:
your participation both a lot less frustrating and your ability to interact with other editors without constant conflict much improved. It is worthwhile to remind oneself periodically that in most questions it is possible for other people to be both unbiased and objective, and
1139:
Ha ha! No, actually Nishidani did the first draft almost single-handedly, but it was built on the previous version, which about nine million SPA editors drove by and shat on. My philosophy is that nothing can refute a fringe theory better than a bald description of it.
1262:
Hi Tom, sorry if that wasnt clear - the reference was to the fact that someone had claimed you had outed someone in July, when you had been editing for a few months. Of course I'm not familiar with the history so I don't know if it is true, misleading or whatever.
265:
To be honest I havent read the book yet (have you?) so no I can't help you. It is not very clear on the page. Saying that natural selection can easily produce complicated things is fine and true, but doesnt disprove the existence of god as far as I can see.
2041:
It is at the bottom of a long post which I needed to make due to a direct request from Johnuniq (evidence of my desire to not be perceived as ignoring an admin). Anyway, the bottom line is that Nishidani's source (which he termed "pellucid") reads:
1213:
1209:
1808:
I'm going to go ahead and assume that you have the best of intentions, but your constant harping about how “sneering” and non-NPOV the article is, is not constructive. For example, what in the world kind of good did you imagine that
1824:. If Nikkimaria's (truly excellent) copy-edits have addressed your concerns then so much the better, and repeating the “sneering” and other pejorative descriptions serve no other purpose than undermining your own credibility.
1969:"... this is not a conspiracy theory when you have a centralized, authoritarian government, as you had in Elizabethan England, you don’t need a conspiracy; you have an imperative from on high and everybody is obedient to it."
1483:, his knowledge of Court life, his extensive education, his academic and cultural achievements, and his wide-ranging travels through France and Italy to what would later become the locations of many of Shakespeare's plays.
1491:
Note that the references are all varying degrees of RS - Encyclopedia Brittanica, US News, Academic Strittmatter (although we all realize that he and Tom don't get on), Fowler - they conform under various policies including
1857:
On the contrary Xover, my criticisms of the NPOV and sneering tone of the article have been very constructive and have led to a considerable improvement to the article and reduction in its bias. And these arguments clearly
1959:
seems to me hardly credible that Shakespeare's manuscripts, many if not all unduplicated by the printer, could have disappeared by accident down to the very last scrap." And in the appendix he quotes himself from a 1972
2126:
2116:
1641:
1205:
157:
published in what I believe is a now-defunct philosophical journal entitled "Logos". I haven't a clue whether Logos was peer-reviewed or not, but I have to think the OUP-published Warrant & Proper Function was.
1820:
as both unconstructive and confrontational. You have by and large failed to convince the other editors of the article on this point, so the best thing you can do is accept that we do not agree on this point and to
1470:
The most popular present-day candidate is Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. After being proposed in the 1920's, Oxford rapidly overtook Bacon to become within two decades the most popular alternative candidate.
2166:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
117:
HI Poujeaux, I nabbed this nifty info box from the Digimon wikiproject, we could turn it into a good tool. Right now it has digimon stuff on it, but that can give us ideas, and help us out. Heres the template:
2034:
Dear Poujeaux, I formally proposed a compromise to resolve the issue. It is based on a new definition which Nishidani dug up today from a source by Paul Prescott. May I please ask that you take a look at it
1754:
The leading present-day candidate is Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. After being proposed in the 1920's, Oxford rapidly overtook Bacon to become within two decades the most popular alternative candidate.
1124:
I'm sure some do! But I think to be fair the article should present the theories in their less nutty form. And well done on the article - I gather it is mostly you, which seems to be the main complaint.
1542:
into SAQ). As I said recently in the talk page, I am trying to keep an open mind about whether the anti-strat case is as weak as it appears in the article, or whether the article is biased. Which
1245:
True Author<- (trumpet flourish), which is a crusade I didn't really want to join, although it seems I was drafted into the army a long time ago when I took my first class on historiography.
2417:
Stritmatter, Roger A.,"The Marginalia of Edward de Vere's Geneva Bible: Providential Discovery, Literary Reasoning, and Historical Consequence", University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 2001.
1936:
Although the article has improved, there are still some examples of this sneering, biased tone in the article, and I will continue point these out to you and the other editors of the page.
1652:
230:
Yeah, I suppose so. Dawkins took off his kid's gloves at a mature age. After many years of patience, he has most definetly earned that right. Not that he needs my approval. Happy editing!
1607:
Gosh - you have changed the article a lot in repsonse to my rather quick comments. Well the structure looks a lot better to me now, with the history section as a separate main article.
1389:
It is very difficult to determine what is "negative" or "insulting" when the topic itself is patently ridiculous and has drawn so many obviously unbalanced advocates. For instance, the
1307:
Since this had to do with the ArbCom case, I believe I am not violating my topic ban by chiming in here. If anyone feels that this is a vio, please have an ArbCom clerk remove this:
1107:
Are you sure you want to cut that? I know some Oxfordians who firmly believe in communication with the dead and they might be offended that you called it "silly"! Cheers Poujeaux!
1648:
An arbitration case regarding the Shakespeare authorship question has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
406:
394:
1828:
has been far far too much conflict here, so anything we can all do to reduce that now and in the future is probably the best possible for both the article and all involved.
1168:
and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
963:
860:
631:
495:
358:
735:
307:
1621:
So far, the suggestions have been specific enough to fix. See if the new form of the history and climate model sections is more up to the standards you had in mind.
2054:
b) "anti-Stratfordians-a collective term for those who believe that someone other than the man from Stratford wrote the plays and poems commonly attributed to him".
375:
300:
1964:
authorities had passed from the scene? If my theory holds, that is what was done, with consummate skill." What exactly would you call such an arrangement?
134:
thanks for dropping me a line about it. If something like that happens again to any atheism related pages, just put a link to it and a little info on the
1480:
643:
New look for Wine Project Page; Wine Article assessment; Operation Stub-killer; New Template for Australian Wineries; New wine stub categories proposed.
192:
I also wanted to welcome you (a bit belatedly) to Knowledge (XXG), and I hope you enjoy it here with the rest of us in our own little corner of Bedlam.
70:
2046:
a) "Anti-Stratfordian' is the collective name for the belief that someone other than the man from Stratford wrote the plays commonly attributed to him"
1590:
I think I was able to address your concerns, which helped minimize historic content and information duplication significantly. See what you think.
30:
to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
1060:
936:
808:
689:
585:
449:
2399:
Ward 1928, pp. 274–275; Smith, Irwin M. (1964), Shakespeare's Blackfriars Playhouse: its history and its design, New York University Press
2191:
1687:
1440:
Again - if this "comment to smatprt" involves the ArbCom case, then I think I can respond here. If not, please have a clerk remove this.
747:
New Grape Infobox; Standard Grape article format; Wine photos; New wine stub categories created; Wine related deletion notices; and more
293:
2216:
1172:
1165:
207:
revert themselves. Once the current debate cools down, there will probably be a chance to discuss it with the others. Best wishes,
54:
2187:
1679:
1672:
1656:
1059:
If you have any Knowledge (XXG) wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of
935:
If you have any Knowledge (XXG) wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of
807:
If you have any Knowledge (XXG) wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of
688:
If you have any Knowledge (XXG) wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of
584:
If you have any Knowledge (XXG) wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of
448:
If you have any Knowledge (XXG) wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of
120:]. If you could tell as many people as possible, that would be great. Perhaps we could replace the existing one at some point.
1522:
I was hoping you might contact me by email. I wanted to give you some references and answer your questions for myself. I'm at
39:
27:
1178:
73:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
2094:
1704:
1212:. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page,
2319:"The Marginalia of Edward de Vere's Geneva Bible: Providential Discovery, Literary Reasoning, and Historical Consequence"
1050:
836:
787:
717:
613:
477:
340:
285:
2074:
1583:
1092:
92:
2336:
2225:
2178:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
59:
2183:
219:
Hi Ethics, no problems mate. I think it unlikely that the debate will cool down - it's always going to be a hot topic!
2248:
1073:
The next few weeks are the perfect time to take photos of grapes in the Northern Hemisphere - get your cameras out!
2355:
1032:
34:
1880:
Removed paragraph about "Shakespeare, Oxford, and Bacon spoke to Percy Allen from the spirit world in 1947..."
1190:
387:
1975:
66:
1466:
Editors note:This is a SUMMARY: detailed additions should be placed in the long article on 'Oxfordian theory'
2318:
1567:
It depends on your interest - Diana Price, regarding the anti-view; Anderson for the best Oxfordian summary.
653:
2062:
1476:
249:
2408:
Akrigg, G.P.V. (1968), Shakespeare and the Earl of Southampton, Harvard University Press, pp. 31–32, 39
2179:
74:
2426:
1995:
disparage and ridicule an alternative viewpoint. This is all very familiar ground from other conflicts.
1770:
1740:
1500:
as long as its clear that this is what advocates say they believe - not what mainstream critics believe
49:
2036:
1815:
would do? It is ok to hold the opinion that a certain specific sentence is phrased in such a way that
1342:
In Edit Summary, Reedy threatened another editor with "embarrassment" if his true identity were known.
245:
2244:
2135:
1626:
1595:
168:
158:
2155:
2146:
2058:
Thank you for your previous comments, and thank you (in advance) for following up on this request.
1678:
NinaGreen is topic-banned indefinitely from editing any article relating (broadly construed) to the
2101:
2015:
1982:
1708:
1683:
1666:
1398:
1390:
1283:
1250:
1186:
1145:
1112:
417:
231:
208:
2175:
2159:
1924:"Copious archival research had failed to turn up the expected confirmation..." and "myriad clues"
1495:
2262:
1185:
Thanks, and if you are aware of any other parties who might be usefully added, please note them.
2129:
to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --
81:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
2213:
1698:
1572:
1529:
1507:
1368:
1208:. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page,
193:
2171:
2163:
1015:
Why port is poison and a special night in Chinon - this issue features your stand-in editor,
2070:
1915:"His dredging machinery failed to retrieve the concealed manuscripts." now changed to "any".
1766:
1736:
1460:
1095:
1074:
1016:
954:
827:
167:
Thanks for your comment, and for your support on the AfD page. I don't see it as partial.
143:
121:
104:
89:
2174:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2167:
1832:
1164:
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at
2368:
2275:
2130:
1845:
1622:
1591:
929:
on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include
912:
801:
on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include
779:
682:
on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include
578:
on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include
549:
442:
on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include
182:
You said: "Looks like another example of wikipedia being too US-centred (note spelling!)"
537:
383:
2097:
2011:
1978:
1662:
1394:
1279:
1246:
1141:
1108:
1028:
767:
668:
560:
314:
253:
formalise the "747 gambit" in a way that makes logical sense. Can you help me in this?
1996:
1937:
1784:
1716:
1608:
1547:
1417:
1264:
1220:
1126:
908:
896:
267:
44:
1694:
1568:
1525:
1503:
1364:
1214:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Workshop
1210:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence
564:
428:
2066:
1523:
1089:
348:
254:
86:
82:
2321:(PhD diss., University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 2001). Partial reprint at
1841:
1731:
Suggested Oxford Summary being proposed and opposed at the SAQ article website
783:
664:
529:
892:
725:
485:
1968:
708:
604:
468:
331:
1642:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question
847:
621:
2038:
and chime in on the NOR as to whether you think it is equitable or not.
1707:). Thus, Smatprt remains topic-banned from editing articles relating to
405:
No current updates. Feel free to list your sub-project and an update on
244:
Hi, Poujeaux. I agree that the problem of evil is a very real one. The
2162:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
2050:
and I therefore proposed that the SAQ switch to this close paraphrase:
974:
378:
aims to develop POV and Notability guidelines for wine related articles
2195:
2140:
2105:
2078:
2019:
2004:
1986:
1945:
1862:
convinced other editors - see the latest set of edits from Nikkimaria.
1849:
1792:
1774:
1744:
1725:
1630:
1616:
1599:
1576:
1555:
1533:
1511:
1425:
1402:
1372:
1287:
1272:
1254:
1229:
1194:
1149:
1134:
1116:
1097:
1077:
1053:
page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include
317:
270:
257:
234:
211:
196:
171:
161:
146:
124:
107:
2427:
http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/unbound/flashbks/shakes/beth.htm
2303:
2282:
Shakespeare and his Rivals: A Casebook on the Authorship Controversy.
1967:
Ogburn claimed in an interview that everybody knew of the deception:
1693:
The Arbitration Committee endorses the community sanction imposed on
1316:
Reedy making an implied threat to embarrass and out a fellow editor.
1166:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests#Shakespeare authorship question
2245:"Hunting for good Will: Will the real Shakespeare please stand up?"
1204:
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located
142:. I'm trying to utilize that stupid thing. anyways, thanks again.
533:
1891:
Biased section titles (one said evidence, the other arguments)
1173:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration
707:
603:
467:
330:
294:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Wine#Vintage_Infos_.28part_II.29
1675:) is banned from Knowledge (XXG) for a period of one year;
1711:, broadly construed, for one year from November 3, 2010.
407:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wine/Newsletter/Sub-projects
2121:
1925:
1905:
1894:
1892:
1881:
1811:
1343:
1317:
185:
But don't you know--the US and the UK are two cultures
1310:
The most recent outing issues involved these actions:
911:
and splinter articles plus update on last WID article
370:
Wine Project Article Assessment guide kicks into gear
872:
New wine product members, Wine GAs and DYKs and more
103:
I saw your edits, great job! Keep up the good work.
2119:) in which you were involved has been modified by
376:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not a wine guide
301:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not a wine guide
2308:Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Peter E. Randall, 1986.
2377:Rivals: A Casebook on the Authorship Controversy.
2154:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
2093:I've made a request that the topic ban be lifted
1070:Newsletter will arrive a little more quickly....
1546:book should I read? Mark Anderson? Diana Price?
306:Please add your comments/input to the talk page
279:New Wine Discussion (by Agne)Â : Input Requested
1974:Evans and Harry Levin's commentary on Ogburn:
1045:This newsletter is sent to those listed under
925:This newsletter is sent to those listed under
797:This newsletter is sent to those listed under
678:This newsletter is sent to those listed under
574:This newsletter is sent to those listed under
438:This newsletter is sent to those listed under
8:
1655:are enacted for all articles related to the
891:This issue's feature is one of our resident
308:Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_is_not_a_wine_guide
1061:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wine/Newsletter
996:New wine members, maps wanted, fame at last
937:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wine/Newsletter
809:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wine/Newsletter
690:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wine/Newsletter
586:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wine/Newsletter
532:with tips on removal. Project drive to get
450:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wine/Newsletter
1057:next to your name on the Participant list.
933:next to your name on the Participant list.
805:next to your name on the Participant list.
686:next to your name on the Participant list.
582:next to your name on the Participant list.
446:next to your name on the Participant list.
65:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
2305:Shakespeare Revealed in Oxford's Letters.
1812:responding to sneering with more sneering
706:
602:
466:
329:
2373:; McMichael, George and Edgar M. Glenn.
2280:; McMichael, George and Edgar M. Glenn.
1219:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
2200:
959:
832:
2364:
2353:
2337:"Edward de Vere, 17th earl of Oxford"
2271:
2270:Italic or bold markup not allowed in:
2260:
2096:. I hope I can count on your support.
1904:Overstated case, anti-strats "all"...
1200:Shakespeare authorship question opened
795:
676:
572:
436:
138:list on the atheism wikiproject under
2226:"Edward de Vere, 17th earl of Oxford"
7:
2125:which changed the wording of the
2212:. London: Harper Perennial. p. 86.
1688:Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford
1455:Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford
77:, ask me on my talk page, or place
35:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
1416:Jacobi and Rylance believe in it?
1363:I hope that clarifies it for you.
507:Updates on Wine article assessment
292:There is an ongoing discussion at
14:
2180:review the candidates' statements
2030:Proposed Resolution to my SAQ NOR
1179:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration guide
2243:Satchell, Michael (2000-07-24).
2127:discretionary sanctions section
2086:Request that topic ban be lifted
1653:Standard discretionary sanctions
1006:Updates on Operation Stub Killer
953:
882:Updates on Operation Stub Killer
826:
782:plus update on last WID article
757:Updates on Operation Stub Killer
667:plus update on last WID article
563:plus update on last WID article
286:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Wine
2341:Britannica Concise Encyclopedia
2230:Britannica Concise Encyclopedia
2117:Shakespeare authorship question
1715:For the Arbitration Committee,
1680:Shakespeare authorship question
1657:Shakespeare authorship question
2186:. For the Election committee,
2156:Arbitration Committee election
2147:ArbCom elections are now open!
1:
2196:16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1946:17:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
1850:15:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
1793:12:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
1775:04:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
1745:04:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
1726:20:55, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
1631:18:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
1617:15:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
1600:15:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
1577:04:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
1078:15:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
1041:
921:
519:Notability of Masters of Wine
271:18:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
258:20:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
235:11:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
212:13:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
2284:Odyssey Press, 1962. p. 159.
2141:19:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
2106:18:12, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
1584:Numerical weather prediction
1556:13:09, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
1534:18:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
1512:19:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
1426:18:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
1403:15:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
1373:18:45, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
1288:12:41, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
1273:18:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
1255:20:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
1230:15:13, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
1195:23:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
318:19:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
197:18:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
172:17:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
55:How to write a great article
2182:and submit your choices on
1150:17:41, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
1135:17:00, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
1117:16:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
1098:00:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
162:05:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
152:Plantinga & publication
147:08:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
125:08:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
2446:
2323:The Shakespeare Fellowship
2188:MediaWiki message delivery
2020:13:17, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
2005:09:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
1987:12:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
1458:
733:
629:
493:
356:
108:05:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
2079:04:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
189:by a common language. :)
75:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
2000:
1941:
1871:Here are a few examples:
1788:
1612:
1551:
1421:
1268:
1130:
786:and comments on the new
140:your immediate attention
2379:Odyssey Press, 1962. p.
2363:line feed character in
2302:Fowler, William Plumer.
1385:Your comment to Smatprt
1160:Request for Arbitration
1033:Châteauneuf-du-Pape AOC
964:Wine Project Newsletter
946:Wine Project Newsletter
819:Wine Project Newsletter
700:Wine Project Newsletter
654:Christopher Tanner, CCC
596:Wine Project Newsletter
460:Wine Project Newsletter
323:Wine Project Newsletter
2429:, accessed 2/18/2011.
1927:changed by Nikkimaria.
1025:Wine Improvement Drive
905:Wine Improvement Drive
776:Wine Improvement Drive
712:
661:Wine Improvement Drive
608:
557:Wine Improvement Drive
472:
425:Wine Improvement Drive
335:
85:13:11, 4 August 2006 (
2317:Stritmatter, Roger A.
2208:Bryson, Bill (2008).
2160:Arbitration Committee
1083:Wine Project activity
766:This issue's feature
711:
652:This issue's feature
607:
471:
334:
26:Hello, Poujeaux, and
2241:; name="usnews": -->
2111:Clarification motion
548:This week's feature
393:Wine related AfD on
250:Free Process Defence
2375:Shakespeare and his
2223:; name="brit": -->
2164:arbitration process
1954:No conspiracy? Huh?
1709:William Shakespeare
1684:William Shakespeare
1481:Earl of Southampton
1391:Prince Tudor theory
528:- Ongoing need for
418:User:Charleenmerced
313:Thanks! Regards --
113:atheism wikiproject
2176:arbitration policy
1055:Decline newsletter
931:Decline newsletter
803:Decline newsletter
788:B Article Adoption
713:
684:Decline newsletter
609:
580:Decline newsletter
473:
444:Decline newsletter
416:This week feature
395:Goosecross Cellars
336:
40:How to edit a page
2356:cite encyclopedia
2082:
2065:comment added by
1801:Sneering and such
1724:
1477:Queen Elizabeth I
1228:
1067:
1066:
1040:
1039:
987:In this edition:
981:
980:
943:
942:
920:
919:
854:
853:
816:
815:
697:
696:
593:
592:
526:Wine Sub-projects
457:
456:
403:Wine Sub-projects
388:Judgment of Paris
296:that has become
2437:
2430:
2424:
2418:
2415:
2409:
2406:
2400:
2397:
2391:
2388:
2382:
2372:
2367:at position 21 (
2366:
2361:
2359:
2351:
2349:
2348:
2334:name="brit": -->
2332:
2326:
2315:
2309:
2300:
2294:
2291:
2285:
2279:
2273:
2268:
2266:
2258:
2256:
2255:
2240:
2238:
2237:
2222:
2205:
2138:
2133:
2124:
2081:
2059:
1814:
1723:
1721:
1461:Oxfordian theory
1227:
1225:
1103:The spirit world
1042:
993:News & Notes
983:
982:
957:
950:
949:
922:
869:News & Notes
856:
855:
830:
823:
822:
744:News & Notes
704:
703:
640:News & Notes
600:
599:
504:News & Notes
464:
463:
367:News & Notes
327:
326:
246:Freewill Defence
202:The God Delusion
80:
2445:
2444:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2436:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2425:
2421:
2416:
2412:
2407:
2403:
2398:
2394:
2390:Wadsworth, 121.
2389:
2385:
2362:
2352:
2346:
2344:
2335:
2333:
2329:
2316:
2312:
2301:
2297:
2293:Wadsworth, 121.
2292:
2288:
2269:
2259:
2253:
2251:
2242:
2235:
2233:
2224:
2219:
2207:
2206:
2202:
2184:the voting page
2150:
2136:
2131:
2120:
2113:
2088:
2060:
2032:
1956:
1810:
1803:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1733:
1717:
1646:
1588:
1520:
1463:
1457:
1387:
1237:
1221:
1202:
1162:
1105:
1085:
968:
948:
913:Sauvignon blanc
861:In this edition
841:
821:
780:Sauvignon blanc
736:In this edition
722:
702:
632:In this edition
618:
598:
550:User:mroconnell
496:In this edition
482:
462:
359:In this edition
345:
325:
281:
204:
180:
169:Gabrielthursday
159:Gabrielthursday
154:
132:
115:
101:
78:
60:Manual of Style
19:
12:
11:
5:
2443:
2441:
2432:
2431:
2419:
2410:
2401:
2392:
2383:
2327:
2310:
2295:
2286:
2217:
2199:
2153:
2149:
2144:
2112:
2109:
2087:
2084:
2056:
2055:
2048:
2047:
2031:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
1955:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1802:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1751:
1732:
1729:
1713:
1712:
1691:
1676:
1660:
1645:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1587:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1563:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1459:Main article:
1456:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1441:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1308:
1297:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1236:
1233:
1201:
1198:
1187:LessHeard vanU
1183:
1182:
1176:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1104:
1101:
1084:
1081:
1065:
1064:
1058:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1029:Cabernet Franc
1021:
1020:
1009:
1008:
999:
998:
988:
979:
978:
969:
960:
958:
947:
944:
941:
940:
934:
918:
917:
916:
915:
901:
900:
885:
884:
875:
874:
864:
852:
851:
842:
833:
831:
820:
817:
814:
813:
806:
793:
792:
791:
790:
772:
771:
768:Steve Moulding
760:
759:
750:
749:
739:
731:
730:
729:
723:
714:
701:
698:
695:
694:
687:
674:
673:
672:
671:
669:Languedoc wine
657:
656:
646:
645:
635:
627:
626:
625:
619:
610:
597:
594:
591:
590:
583:
570:
569:
568:
567:
561:Languedoc wine
553:
552:
542:
541:
536:article up to
522:
521:
499:
491:
490:
489:
483:
474:
461:
458:
455:
454:
447:
434:
433:
432:
431:
421:
420:
410:
409:
399:
398:
384:Requested Move
362:
354:
353:
352:
346:
337:
324:
321:
315:Steve.Moulding
304:
303:
280:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
232:EthicsGradient
223:
222:
221:
220:
209:EthicsGradient
203:
200:
179:
176:
175:
174:
153:
150:
131:
128:
114:
111:
100:
97:
71:sign your name
63:
62:
57:
52:
47:
42:
37:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2442:
2428:
2423:
2420:
2414:
2411:
2405:
2402:
2396:
2393:
2387:
2384:
2380:
2376:
2370:
2357:
2342:
2338:
2331:
2328:
2324:
2320:
2314:
2311:
2307:
2306:
2299:
2296:
2290:
2287:
2283:
2277:
2264:
2250:
2246:
2231:
2227:
2220:
2218:9780007197903
2215:
2211:
2204:
2201:
2198:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2148:
2145:
2143:
2142:
2139:
2134:
2128:
2123:
2118:
2110:
2108:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2090:Hi Poujeaux,
2085:
2083:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2039:
2037:
2029:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1977:
1971:
1970:
1965:
1962:
1953:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1926:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1906:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1895:
1893:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1882:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1861:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1834:
1829:
1825:
1823:
1818:
1813:
1806:
1805:Hi Poujeaux.
1800:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1752:
1749:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1730:
1728:
1727:
1722:
1720:
1710:
1706:
1703:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1674:
1671:
1668:
1664:
1661:
1658:
1654:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1643:
1640:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1585:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1524:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1484:
1482:
1478:
1472:
1468:
1467:
1462:
1454:
1442:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1414:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1384:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1344:
1341:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1241:
1234:
1232:
1231:
1226:
1224:
1217:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1199:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1180:
1177:
1174:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1167:
1159:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1102:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1093:
1091:
1082:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1071:
1062:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1011:
1010:
1007:
1004:
1001:
1000:
997:
994:
991:
990:
989:
985:
984:
976:
972:
967:
965:
956:
952:
951:
945:
938:
932:
928:
924:
923:
914:
910:
909:Bordeaux wine
906:
903:
902:
898:
894:
890:
887:
886:
883:
880:
877:
876:
873:
870:
867:
866:
865:
862:
858:
857:
849:
845:
840:
838:
829:
825:
824:
818:
812:
810:
804:
800:
794:
789:
785:
781:
777:
774:
773:
769:
765:
762:
761:
758:
755:
752:
751:
748:
745:
742:
741:
740:
737:
732:
727:
721:
719:
710:
705:
699:
693:
691:
685:
681:
675:
670:
666:
662:
659:
658:
655:
651:
648:
647:
644:
641:
638:
637:
636:
633:
628:
623:
617:
615:
606:
601:
595:
589:
587:
581:
577:
571:
566:
562:
558:
555:
554:
551:
547:
544:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
524:
523:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
502:
501:
500:
497:
492:
487:
481:
479:
470:
465:
459:
453:
451:
445:
441:
435:
430:
426:
423:
422:
419:
415:
412:
411:
408:
404:
401:
400:
397:
396:
390:
389:
385:
382:Wine related
379:
377:
371:
368:
365:
364:
363:
360:
355:
350:
344:
342:
333:
328:
322:
320:
319:
316:
311:
309:
302:
299:
298:
297:
295:
290:
288:
287:
278:
272:
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
256:
251:
247:
236:
233:
229:
228:
227:
226:
225:
224:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
210:
201:
199:
198:
195:
190:
188:
183:
178:Just for fun!
177:
173:
170:
166:
165:
164:
163:
160:
151:
149:
148:
145:
141:
137:
130:ipu is saved!
129:
127:
126:
123:
119:
112:
110:
109:
106:
98:
96:
94:
91:
88:
84:
76:
72:
68:
61:
58:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
33:
32:
31:
29:
24:
23:
16:
2422:
2413:
2404:
2395:
2386:
2378:
2374:
2345:. Retrieved
2340:
2330:
2322:
2313:
2304:
2298:
2289:
2281:
2252:. Retrieved
2234:. Retrieved
2229:
2209:
2203:
2151:
2114:
2092:
2089:
2061:— Preceding
2057:
2049:
2040:
2033:
1972:
1966:
1960:
1957:
1859:
1840:disagree. --
1837:
1830:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1807:
1804:
1765:
1750:
1734:
1718:
1714:
1701:
1669:
1647:
1589:
1562:
1543:
1521:
1499:
1485:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1464:
1412:
1388:
1339:
1313:
1296:
1242:
1238:
1222:
1218:
1203:
1184:
1163:
1106:
1086:
1072:
1068:
1054:
1051:Wine Project
1047:Participants
1046:
1031:, currently
1024:
1012:
1005:
1003:Sub Projects
1002:
995:
992:
986:
970:
961:
930:
927:Participants
926:
904:
897:The Bethling
888:
881:
879:Sub Projects
878:
871:
868:
859:
843:
837:Wine Project
834:
802:
799:Participants
798:
796:
775:
763:
756:
754:Sub Projects
753:
746:
743:
734:
718:Wine Project
715:
683:
680:Participants
679:
677:
660:
649:
642:
639:
630:
620:Issue III -
614:Wine Project
611:
579:
576:Participants
575:
573:
556:
545:
525:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
494:
478:Wine Project
475:
443:
440:Participants
439:
437:
424:
413:
402:
392:
381:
373:
369:
366:
357:
341:Wine Project
338:
312:
305:
291:
284:
282:
243:
205:
194:Justin Eiler
191:
186:
184:
181:
155:
139:
135:
133:
116:
102:
99:Atheism page
64:
25:
21:
20:
2272:|publisher=
2210:Shakespeare
2132:S Philbrick
1767:Zweigenbaum
1737:Zweigenbaum
1075:FlagSteward
1017:FlagSteward
839:Newsletter!
724:Issue IV -
720:Newsletter!
616:Newsletter!
530:Wine labels
511:Wine Portal
484:Issue II -
480:Newsletter!
349:February 18
343:Newsletter!
144:Somerset219
122:Somerset219
105:Somerset219
2347:2007-08-31
2254:2007-08-31
2236:2007-08-31
2172:topic bans
1623:Thegreatdr
1592:Thegreatdr
1314:12/27/2010
1013:Wiki-Winos
893:winemakers
889:Wiki-Winos
784:Pinot gris
764:Wiki-Winos
665:Pinot Gris
650:Wiki-Winos
546:Wiki-Winos
414:Wiki-Winos
374:New Essay
347:Issue I -
79:{{helpme}}
67:Wikipedian
45:Help pages
2263:cite news
2249:U.S. News
2168:site bans
2115:A case (
2098:NinaGreen
2012:Tom Reedy
1979:Tom Reedy
1822:let it go
1663:NinaGreen
1496:WP:Fringe
1395:Tom Reedy
1340:1/10/2011
1280:Tom Reedy
1247:Tom Reedy
1142:Tom Reedy
1109:Tom Reedy
726:April 1st
565:Carmenère
515:Barnstars
486:March 4th
429:Carmenère
187:separated
69:! Please
2075:contribs
2063:unsigned
1997:Poujeaux
1961:Harper's
1938:Poujeaux
1831:PS. The
1785:Poujeaux
1705:contribs
1673:contribs
1609:Poujeaux
1548:Poujeaux
1479:and the
1418:Poujeaux
1265:Poujeaux
1127:Poujeaux
971:Issue VI
848:April 15
622:March 18
289:member:
268:Poujeaux
248:and the
50:Tutorial
22:Welcome!
2365:|title=
1695:Smatprt
1569:Smatprt
1526:Smatprt
1518:Contact
1504:Smatprt
1494:], and
1365:Smatprt
1049:on the
977:, 2007
975:May 6th
850:, 2007
844:Issue V
728:, 2007
624:, 2007
488:, 2007
386:on the
351:, 2007
28:welcome
17:Welcome
2343:. 2007
2232:. 2007
2158:. The
2137:(Talk)
2122:motion
2067:Rogala
1833:WP:AGF
1644:closed
1027:- was
517:; and
255:NBeale
83:ais523
1842:Xover
1838:still
1686:, or
283:Dear
136:to do
2381:159.
2369:help
2276:help
2214:ISBN
2192:talk
2102:talk
2071:talk
2035:here
2016:talk
2001:talk
1983:talk
1942:talk
1860:have
1846:talk
1789:talk
1771:talk
1741:talk
1699:talk
1667:talk
1627:talk
1613:talk
1596:talk
1573:talk
1552:talk
1530:talk
1508:talk
1422:talk
1399:talk
1369:talk
1284:talk
1269:talk
1251:talk
1235:Huh?
1206:here
1191:talk
1146:talk
1131:talk
1113:talk
1090:Agne
962:The
835:The
716:The
612:The
534:Wine
476:The
339:The
2152:Hi,
1817:you
1719:AGK
1586:FAC
1544:one
1413:two
1223:AGK
2360::
2358:}}
2354:{{
2339:.
2267::
2265:}}
2261:{{
2247:.
2228:.
2194:)
2170:,
2104:)
2077:)
2073:•
2018:)
2003:)
1985:)
1944:)
1848:)
1791:)
1773:)
1743:)
1735:--
1682:,
1629:)
1615:)
1598:)
1575:)
1554:)
1532:)
1510:)
1498:,
1424:)
1401:)
1371:)
1286:)
1271:)
1253:)
1216:.
1193:)
1148:)
1133:)
1115:)
1063:.
973:-
939:.
907:-
895:-
863::
846:-
811:.
778:-
738::
692:.
663:-
634::
588:.
559:-
538:GA
513:,
509:;
498::
452:.
427:-
391:;
380:;
372:;
361::
310:.
95:)
2371:)
2350:.
2325:.
2278:)
2274:(
2257:.
2239:.
2221:.
2190:(
2100:(
2069:(
2014:(
1999:(
1981:(
1940:(
1844:(
1787:(
1769:(
1739:(
1702:·
1697:(
1690:;
1670:·
1665:(
1659:;
1625:(
1611:(
1594:(
1571:(
1550:(
1528:(
1506:(
1420:(
1397:(
1367:(
1282:(
1267:(
1249:(
1189:(
1181:.
1175:;
1144:(
1129:(
1111:(
1094:/
1019:.
966:!
899:.
770:.
540:.
93:C
90:T
87:U
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.