846:
coincidences, including 36 common articles, common view on deletions, and some deleted material you had in common, which set off red flags for me, but he is comfortable that the style of you and BigzMMA is different enough to call this one giant coincidence and I will take his word for it. Sorry for the inconvenience. As you can imagine, sockpuppeting is a common problem from previously blocked editors, and the natural instinct is to block when we see this many coincidences. I'm not one to require all the bureaucracy when it comes to review, which is why I expedited this and just handled it myself by selecting someone I knew would do a fair job and not simply rubber stamp my previous actions, and didn't want to force you to go through the long winded formal process either. Hopefully, there are no hard feelings and while it was in error, I hope you understand how the error occurred. If you have any more questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page, and I will be happy to explain. Glad to have you here, sorry about the bumpy road.
907:
but after this we couldn't be any more different even if we tried. I forgive you for this error, but I do feel that everything went so rapid, the time from when suspicions were being made to deciding to block me was way too quick to process for a clear investigation (I only received the messages the day after I was blocked, any only used
Knowledge (XXG) just a day before the decision was made) as well as not informing me of a investigation taking place. So with this mind I hope that you as well as other users give it a bit longer to investigate as well as informing the user in question so they get their chance to defend themselves and state their case so a clearer decision can be made. Thank you as well for reinstating my sandbox, much appreciated!
1313:
I have always tried not to be like that, even when other users push my buttons a bit I have tried to show a reasonable, calm approach to any difficult situation. I don't understand how I should 'Tred carefully' when I haven't don't anything wrong recently, all I have done was just edit pages like anyone else here and like how I have been for months. I will continue to maintain my posture, read all the information carefully and speak up when necessary, but after last time, you can see why this does almost anger me. As long as I actually get the SPI link when the conversation begin then I will have no reason to show emotion on here. I am still awaiting for advice from Dennis Brown, so once I get his opinion then I will be ready to deal with the SPI.
534:, they easily over pass them in terms of gaining top tier status, Affliction had only two events and the promotion died out when the main event to the third event was affected with a positive drugs test, and if a promotion like that can pass for top tier, I reckon Asia;s biggest promotion can pass for it as well. I had mixed feeling with BAMMA, but I felt that their new TV deal on mainstream TV as well as the coverage they receive were strong enough factors to upgrade their position. Feel welcome to change BAMMA if necessary but I feel strong enough about ONE FC to keep them as top tier.
1283:
the fact that my IP address from my house wasn't blocked also then I would probably be still blocked now. I have proven to the admins that we are not the same, and I fail to see a clear enough link between us for another SPI to exist. I will be bringing up this message to the admin who unblocked me to see what I should expect to happen if you choose to reopen this. If you do reopen it, then I would very much appreciate some notification - as well as a link to the discussion so that I can state my case too.
123:
collapsible table - once he has five fights or so then this might be more appropriate I think; until then it's just taking up space whilst the sidebar does the same job. Ive also removed the note in the lead (but kept the reference further down) - again, it's a question of using the lead to tell people why he's most notable - and his martial artistry really pales into utter insignificance in comparison with his cricket career I think.
1437:
666:
244:
1456:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see
1005:
diehards or the wider community. If a page like that is to be kept, it should at least reflect on all the promotions that MMANOT have listed as notable, it should be updated by the event and should include notable things that has happened to each event, such as UFC 152's new main event due to UFC 151's cancellation.
1297:
If I recall correctly, you were unblocked not because it was proved you were not BigzMMA. Rather, you were unblocked because there was a lack of proof that you were BigzMMA. It is quite possible that, assuming the two of you are the same, additional evidence has come up (other than editing history)
420:
Certainly if I do submit it to AfD I will point out that the article is vastly improved and that the concerns raised in the first debate have been addressed. Thinking about it the only reactionary Speedy Delete was from me. Maybe we should just let sleeping dogs lie and if it comes up again then do
1312:
I not entirely sure what evidence there is for us to compared to, again I can say why some users may see us as the same because we have edited on the same/similar articles, but after that we aren't anything alike, as his approach seemed to be an aggressive, confrontational and even violent-like, and
1282:
I have already proven that I am not this user, there is just no way for us to be the same person. I have truly never heard of this user before I was blocked without any warning, or even a message to say that a SPI was going on with me as a suspect so that I could of stated my case, if it weren't for
906:
I am really graceful to Steven Zhang for his review as this has helped brought me back without any further complications. I do understand what you mean, I have looked over so many pages that BigzMMA since my block and can see something of a link between us in terms of interest and similar location,
649:
I have only just got all this, and I really am surprised that I had not been informed that any such discussions were happening. I am not BigzMMA, as I have never even heard of this user until right now. Looking over the discussions that were going on, apparently we have edited on the similar pages,
287:
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can
751:
I am not BigzMMA, I haven't even heard of this user up until half hour ago, and all I can see is that we have edited on similar pages, if there was any way I can convince you all that I am not the same user I would do so, but with the internet being the way it is I know that this is impossible, so
1410:
After taking two months off, I feel ready to contribute to
Knowledge (XXG) again and hopefully the hostility towards me has now died down enough for me to get assistance to finding an administrator to hear me out. I cannot edit on other users/admins pages so if someone can forward me a link to an
1019:
I would say that if the 2012 page is out of date it's because editors haven't bothered to update it, but the concept of the page is still sound. If you want to have an
Invicta events page, I believe my previous comments are still valid. That is, you don't need the results of every fight, you do
1004:
page, and to be honest I reckon it should be either deleted or it needs to be revamped in leaps and bounds, simply because it is out of date, it doesn't reflect on MMA events this year in general and it is so bland it doesn't offer any real detail that would be worth anyone reading, both for the
845:
has reviewed the block and has enough reasonable doubt that I have unblocked your account. He will add a rationale on my talk page later, I just wanted to get you unblocked now. Hopefully his assessment is correct and I will gladly defer to his decision in this matter. There were a few strong
808:
I created that article, not him! He must of created the original but poorly written one that I saw last year, and I decided that Iain
Martell was notable based on what I found on him over the last few months and decided to recreated it in my own better version, entirely from scratch and after my
188:
in MMA, and that was nearly two years ago, but partly because he has still contemplated competing in MMA again and the fact that it was a notable thing in his life, the information along with the fight record has remained. Despite the fact that
Hollioake did not fight for a major promotion like
122:
Hi. Thanks for your edits to this page. I've tweaked some of them a little bit - more or less on the grounds that a single fight doesn't exactly make him a martial artist just yet! He really is much more notable for his cricket career still. I've kept the infobox where it is but removed the
809:
version was deleted, I decided to keep my version on my sandbox to keep it updated on there until a time came when everyone can agree that he has become notable without having to write everything again. I am not using anything that this user used and I am definitely not this BigzMMA.
228:
The fight record should stay based on similar cases of cross-over athletes making some sort of mark in MMA. Not too sure about the side bar to be honest but I reckon that if he has another fight it should remain, but the fight record should stay in the same way as my examples have.
140:
Looking over it, I can agree with what your saying, except it might be worth having the MMA record up on the page, I've seen others pages of well known MMA fighters that made their names outside the sport that have only a small number of fights that has their fight records on here
999:
I feel that seen as the events are being covered by reliable sources and that because one single MMA event page isn't notable that an omnibus page would be ideal for
Invicta, it simply looked too scruffy on the Invicta main page to keep it on there. I had a look at the
979:
I have a few comments about the
Invicta events article. First, remember that the write-up you have for the first event was already deleted at an AfD discussion. Just listing the results does not show notability. I would suggest that putting a section on Invicta into
473:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge (XXG). For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on
284:. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
1363:
We are not the same user, I am tired of dealing with these accusations that somehow are being 'proven' true but I do still want to edit on
Knowledge (XXG), I will take a few months off here, then will attempt to regain my editing privileges back once I'm ready.
164:
Hmmm, OK - it fills the hole next to the sidebar so lets go with it for now - but if he never fights again we'll take it (and I guess the sidebar?) down in a few months or something (is a few months a reasonable time to wait for an mma fight - I have no idea)
823:
I have taken this to the
English Knowledge (XXG) Unblock Ticket Request System as I feel that any other future attempts to have my user page unblocked via my talk page would be denied in the same manner so I will await their decision from here on.
378:
The article is well referenced and I like the
History paragraph where you show the evolution. It should be a bit more clear that Dave O'Donnell was connected to Cage Rage and what exactly is the connection between Ultimate Challenge UK and UCMMA.
300:
212:
Oh. the information stays - as prose - for sure. Whether or not the side bar and fight record, which are clearly useful for more established fighters, should stay is more arguable. But there's plenty of time to wait and see about all that.
294:
to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with
412:
Notable Fighters - not so sure about that - you have a list but perhaps a paragraph with a few exceptional names that have fought in the event. Has it hosted events with Tier 1 fighters - people who have done well in lets say
1255:
as I find your editing patten striking similar. If you are then I wish to to give you one more chance to come clean and throw yourself at the mercy of the admins. If not it is my intention to re-open the SPI.
522:
I disagree with adding BAMMA and ONE FC to the top tier, One FC lacks sufficient longevity, and thus has failed to promote a sizable number of cards. As for BAMMA virtually all of there belts are vacant.--
1028:. Another problem with an Invicta events page is that, as the number of events increases, the page will become more unwieldy. I do agree with your moving the events out of the promotion's article page.
500:
1119:
197:
like Toney or Walker, the fact that his MMA experience was covered by sources like the BBC has meant that there is enough strong support to keep the information there for as long as the page exists.
609:
1111:
321:
I have no knowledge of the original article written, but I do believe that the article I written is very good, as it is backed up by good sources, it is well written and meets
620:
during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
382:
I would not use "as been slowly but progressively making steady moves to regain the same popularity" which sounds weak. How about "steadily approaching the popularity of"
1330:
1156:
801:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1219:
1166:
1077:
949:
1209:
1152:
1115:
939:
1205:
984:
would be a better idea. Put in some prose highlighting the significance of each event and don't feel compelled to put in the results of every fight.
1468:
895:
865:
650:
so I can see where this idea has come from, but I truely do not know of this person. What will it take to re-ensure you all that I am not this user?
639:
578:
233:
935:
706:
786:
474:
1268:
1215:
1162:
1073:
945:
466:
180:
Well, I would say leave it there permanently, a few months is kinda short notice when you think about it. Going back to one of my examples,
391:
No matter what happens - an AfD will be necessary. Right now you will constantly see reactionary Speedy Deletes based on the past Afd.
888:
858:
632:
571:
281:
1001:
981:
701:
26:
459:
1067:
51:
1212:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
1159:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
1070:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
942:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
253:
56:
1452:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a
1063:
1457:
336:
Fair enough, I've restored for now, I suggest you make it clear on the talk page how much you have done, perhaps with a
296:
277:
1385:
679:
325:. I hope that the speedly deletion goes away soon that it would be a massive shame for this good article to be deleted
66:
218:
170:
131:
105:
93:
1412:
673:
260:
60:
1020:
need more prose, and the significance of each event needs to be highlighted. Otherwise, I believe you run afoul of
1448:
1196:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
1143:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
1050:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
926:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
678:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
470:
455:
499:
Because you participated in a previous deletion discussion about this subject, I'm notifying you that I've opened
1272:
720:
482:
416:
Comparision to BAMMA - I don't think this is necessary per se but it was raised once so it might be raised again.
385:
finally some actual number with respect to viewers would be good to help establish Notability if you have them.
304:
37:
22:
531:
1025:
764:
617:
601:
550:
73:
530:) 23:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC) One FC is currently Asia's most watched upon MMA promotion, and if compared to
214:
166:
149:
are two that come to mind). For this reason I'm going to put it back on the page, but thanks for the input.
127:
101:
608:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
77:
883:
853:
627:
566:
89:
508:
290:
81:
388:
It is not clear to me what the ranking of UCMMA is in relationship to other European or UK promotions.
42:
1144:
527:
478:
1021:
458:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge (XXG) uses a set of
349:
269:
237:
492:
308:
1472:
1303:
1197:
1033:
989:
359:
Ok, thank you very much for replying back to me and restoring it, I will work on this right now.
276:, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a
33:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
1380:
1411:
admin off-wiki or bring an admin to my game to see this message so I can state my case through
1110:
i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a
88:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
1235:
1182:
1093:
965:
927:
877:
847:
842:
621:
560:
312:
1416:
1395:
1365:
1339:
1314:
1284:
1262:
1129:
1006:
908:
825:
810:
795:
772:
684:
651:
535:
504:
440:
426:
396:
360:
198:
150:
613:
605:
322:
273:
523:
146:
1453:
272:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
342:
115:
30:
1299:
1226:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1173:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1084:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1029:
985:
956:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
931:
1298:
that shows a link. Tred carefully is the only advice I can offer at this point. --
1267:
23:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC) Accusations and deletions are your only contributions?
1252:
1245:
1231:
1227:
1178:
1174:
1089:
1085:
961:
957:
47:
1390:
1334:
1257:
1125:
768:
436:
422:
392:
194:
181:
142:
1118:
for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get
763:
If you're not him, how come that you had the text of his deleted article at
1477:
1424:
1399:
1373:
1344:
1322:
1307:
1292:
1276:
1239:
1186:
1133:
1097:
1037:
1014:
993:
969:
916:
900:
870:
833:
818:
776:
659:
644:
583:
543:
512:
486:
444:
430:
400:
368:
354:
316:
222:
206:
174:
158:
135:
109:
252:
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
1201:
1055:
185:
1415:
to try to find a way to regain my full editing privileges. Thank you.
501:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Iain Martell (3rd nomination)
1051:
604:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
85:
610:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:Pound4Pound/sandbox
1383:
it list the criteria for getting your editing privileges back.
1148:
1059:
616:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
190:
1435:
664:
242:
465:
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from
783:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
803:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
405:
I looked at the old debate and there were three points.
1200:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1147:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1054:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages
930:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
734:
730:
724:
715:
711:
697:
693:
689:
337:
1467:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
1430:
Orphaned non-free image File:Sfl challengers logo.png
672:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
96:, or ask your question on this page and then place
559:Block was reversed after review by Steven Zhang -
1331:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/BigzMMA
1192:Disambiguation link notification for September 29
1139:Disambiguation link notification for September 22
450:License tagging for File:Sfl challengers logo.png
1046:Disambiguation link notification for September 6
250:
1463:Note that any non-free images not used in any
922:Disambiguation link notification for August 30
409:Sourcing - I think that is well taken care of.
274:section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1251:Is it still your contention that you are not
8:
590:The following discussion has been closed.
555:
299:. If the page is deleted, you can contact
72:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
475:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions
297:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
752:all I ask is for someone to believe me.
254:the guide to writing your first article
126:But good work - keep it up and so on.
100:before the question. Again, welcome!
477:. Thank you for your cooperation. --
435:Great - let me know if you need help.
7:
1379:That is a good idea, have a read of
307:the page or email a copy to you.
259:You may want to consider using the
38:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
876:I've also restored your sandbox.
303:to request that the administrator
25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
1002:2012 in mixed martial arts events
982:2012 in mixed martial arts events
57:How to create your first article
462:to indicate this information.
1413:Knowledge (XXG):Standard offer
1240:11:06, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
1187:15:46, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
1134:01:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
29:, especially what you did for
1:
1458:our policy for non-free media
1449:File:Sfl challengers logo.png
1345:08:29, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
1323:14:28, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
1308:14:15, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
1293:13:45, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
1277:02:39, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
1098:11:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
1038:18:37, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
1015:13:41, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
994:19:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
456:File:Sfl challengers logo.png
291:the page's talk page directly
1469:criteria for speedy deletion
263:to help you create articles.
1400:19:50, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
1374:19:08, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
970:12:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
917:22:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
901:23:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
871:23:02, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
834:11:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
819:11:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
777:13:41, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
676:, who declined the request.
660:12:38, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
645:01:45, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
584:23:02, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
544:11:23, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
301:one of these administrators
1493:
1478:17:20, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
1425:19:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
513:22:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
487:13:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
1436:
787:guide to appealing blocks
445:00:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
431:09:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
401:13:17, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
369:11:25, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
355:11:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
340:from the earlier version
268:A tag has been placed on
90:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
1420:
1369:
1329:No problem - please see
1318:
1288:
1010:
912:
829:
814:
765:User:Pound4Pound/sandbox
655:
618:User:Pound4Pound/sandbox
602:User:Pound4Pound/sandbox
593:Please do not modify it.
551:User:Pound4Pound/sandbox
539:
532:Affliction Entertainment
364:
317:21:48, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
223:15:21, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
207:15:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
202:
175:13:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
159:13:17, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
154:
136:12:54, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
110:12:50, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
21:Hello, Pound4Pound, and
52:How to develop articles
1441:
975:Invicta events article
669:
612:and please be sure to
265:
247:
1446:Thanks for uploading
1439:
721:change block settings
668:
454:Thanks for uploading
282:articles for deletion
246:
1228:opt-out instructions
1175:opt-out instructions
1145:Paul Kelly (fighter)
1120:more people involved
1086:opt-out instructions
958:opt-out instructions
460:image copyright tags
1210:fix with Dab solver
1157:fix with Dab solver
1068:fix with Dab solver
940:fix with Dab solver
421:an AfD. Your call.
1442:
1218:• Join us at the
1198:Super Fight League
1165:• Join us at the
1076:• Join us at the
948:• Join us at the
670:
614:sign your comments
549:MfD nomination of
248:
48:How to edit a page
27:your contributions
1454:claim of fair use
1223:
1170:
1081:
953:
928:Invicta FC events
899:
891:
886:
869:
861:
856:
843:User:Steven Zhang
840:
839:
643:
635:
630:
582:
574:
569:
215:Blue Square Thing
167:Blue Square Thing
128:Blue Square Thing
102:Blue Square Thing
80:your messages on
1484:
1444:
1438:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1342:
1337:
1265:
1260:
1213:
1206:check to confirm
1160:
1153:check to confirm
1071:
1064:check to confirm
943:
936:check to confirm
893:
889:
884:
863:
859:
854:
800:
794:
740:
738:
727:
709:
707:deleted contribs
667:
637:
633:
628:
595:
576:
572:
567:
556:
352:
345:
245:
118:- Martial Artist
99:
1492:
1491:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1433:
1432:
1408:
1406:Ready to return
1391:
1386:
1384:
1361:
1340:
1335:
1269:173.168.140.188
1263:
1258:
1249:
1220:DPL WikiProject
1194:
1167:DPL WikiProject
1141:
1105:
1078:DPL WikiProject
1048:
977:
950:DPL WikiProject
924:
806:
798:
792:
791:, then use the
780:
754:
728:
718:
704:
687:
680:blocking policy
665:
591:
554:
520:
497:
479:ImageTaggingBot
452:
376:
350:
343:
334:
278:deletion debate
266:
243:
241:
234:Speedy deletion
147:Herschel Walker
120:
97:
67:Manual of Style
19:
12:
11:
5:
1490:
1488:
1471:. Thank you. —
1431:
1428:
1407:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1360:
1359:Taking a break
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1248:
1243:
1193:
1190:
1140:
1137:
1104:
1101:
1047:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1026:WP:SPORTSEVENT
976:
973:
923:
920:
904:
903:
838:
837:
781:
761:
757:Decline reason
749:
745:Request reason
742:
663:
597:
596:
587:
586:
553:
547:
519:
518:MMA notability
516:
496:
490:
451:
448:
418:
417:
414:
410:
375:
372:
333:
330:
328:
261:Article Wizard
249:
240:
236:nomination of
231:
226:
225:
184:only had just
178:
177:
119:
116:Adam Hollioake
113:
70:
69:
64:
61:Article Wizard
54:
45:
40:
31:Adam Hollioake
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1489:
1480:
1479:
1476:
1475:
1470:
1466:
1461:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1450:
1443:
1429:
1427:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1394:
1389:
1382:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1358:
1346:
1343:
1338:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1261:
1254:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1224:
1221:
1217:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1191:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1138:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1108:
1102:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1079:
1075:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1045:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1003:
998:
997:
996:
995:
991:
987:
983:
974:
972:
971:
967:
963:
959:
954:
951:
947:
941:
937:
933:
932:Sarah Kaufman
929:
921:
919:
918:
914:
910:
902:
898:
897:
892:
887:
881:
880:
875:
874:
873:
872:
868:
867:
862:
857:
851:
850:
844:
836:
835:
831:
827:
821:
820:
816:
812:
805:
804:
797:
790:
788:
779:
778:
774:
770:
766:
760:
758:
753:
748:
746:
741:
736:
732:
726:
722:
717:
713:
708:
703:
699:
698:global blocks
695:
694:active blocks
691:
686:
681:
677:
675:
674:administrator
662:
661:
657:
653:
647:
646:
642:
641:
636:
631:
625:
624:
619:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
598:
594:
589:
588:
585:
581:
580:
575:
570:
564:
563:
558:
557:
552:
548:
546:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
517:
515:
514:
510:
506:
502:
494:
491:
489:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
463:
461:
457:
449:
447:
446:
442:
438:
433:
432:
428:
424:
415:
411:
408:
407:
406:
403:
402:
398:
394:
389:
386:
383:
380:
373:
371:
370:
366:
362:
357:
356:
353:
348:
346:
339:
331:
329:
326:
324:
319:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
293:
292:
285:
283:
280:, such as at
279:
275:
271:
270:Jake Bostwick
264:
262:
257:
255:
239:
238:Jake Bostwick
235:
232:
230:
224:
220:
216:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
187:
183:
176:
172:
168:
163:
162:
161:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
138:
137:
133:
129:
124:
117:
114:
112:
111:
107:
103:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
53:
49:
46:
44:
41:
39:
36:
35:
34:
32:
28:
24:
16:
1473:
1464:
1462:
1447:
1445:
1434:
1409:
1362:
1250:
1225:
1195:
1172:
1142:
1124:
1109:
1106:
1083:
1049:
978:
955:
925:
905:
894:
879:Dennis Brown
878:
864:
849:Dennis Brown
848:
841:
822:
807:
802:
784:
782:
762:
756:
755:
750:
744:
743:
716:creation log
683:
671:
648:
638:
623:Dennis Brown
622:
600:
592:
577:
562:Dennis Brown
561:
521:
498:
493:Iain Martell
464:
453:
434:
419:
404:
390:
387:
384:
381:
377:
358:
341:
335:
332:Iain Martell
327:
320:
289:
286:
267:
258:
251:
227:
179:
139:
125:
121:
94:my talk page
92:, ask me on
71:
63:if you wish)
20:
1417:Pound4Pound
1366:Pound4Pound
1315:Pound4Pound
1285:Pound4Pound
1116:Wikiproject
1112:Participant
1007:Pound4Pound
909:Pound4Pound
826:Pound4Pound
811:Pound4Pound
769:Max Semenik
685:Pound4Pound
652:Pound4Pound
536:Pound4Pound
505:Mark Arsten
469:, click on
437:Peter Rehse
423:Peter Rehse
393:Peter Rehse
361:Pound4Pound
351:talk to me?
288:also visit
199:Pound4Pound
195:Strikeforce
182:James Toney
151:Pound4Pound
143:James Toney
98:{{help me}}
84:using four
59:(using the
1230:. Thanks,
1177:. Thanks,
1088:. Thanks,
1022:WP:ROUTINE
960:. Thanks,
712:filter log
524:Phospheros
82:talk pages
74:Wikipedian
1214:Read the
1161:Read the
1072:Read the
944:Read the
785:read the
731:checkuser
690:block log
471:this link
467:this list
344:Jimfbleak
186:one fight
76:! Please
1474:innotata
1465:articles
1381:WP:OFFER
1300:TreyGeek
1030:Papaursa
986:Papaursa
896:Join WER
866:Join WER
702:contribs
640:Join WER
606:deletion
579:Join WER
43:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
1253:BigzMMA
1246:BigzMMA
1232:DPL bot
1202:Olympic
1179:DPL bot
1114:on the
1107:Hello,
1090:DPL bot
1056:Setanta
962:DPL bot
796:unblock
725:unblock
309:Bgwhite
23:welcome
1392:Mtking
1126:Kevlar
1103:WP:MMA
323:WP:GNG
305:userfy
86:tildes
1052:BAMMA
789:first
374:UCMMA
1421:talk
1370:talk
1341:king
1319:talk
1304:talk
1289:talk
1273:talk
1264:king
1236:talk
1183:talk
1130:talk
1094:talk
1058:and
1034:talk
1024:and
1011:talk
990:talk
966:talk
913:talk
830:talk
815:talk
773:talk
656:talk
540:talk
528:talk
509:talk
483:talk
441:talk
427:talk
413:UFC?
397:talk
365:talk
338:diff
313:talk
219:talk
203:talk
171:talk
155:talk
145:and
132:talk
106:talk
78:sign
50:and
1460:).
1216:FAQ
1163:FAQ
1149:WEC
1074:FAQ
1060:TDN
946:FAQ
735:log
682:).
495:Afd
193:or
191:UFC
1423:)
1372:)
1336:Mt
1333:.
1321:)
1306:)
1291:)
1275:)
1259:Mt
1238:)
1208:|
1185:)
1155:|
1132:)
1122:!
1096:)
1066:|
1036:)
1013:)
992:)
968:)
938:|
915:)
885:2¢
882:-
855:2¢
852:-
832:)
817:)
799:}}
793:{{
775:)
767:?
759::
747::
729:•
723:•
719:•
714:•
710:•
705:•
700:•
696:•
692:•
658:)
629:2¢
626:-
568:2¢
565:-
542:)
511:)
503:.
485:)
443:)
429:)
399:)
367:)
347:-
315:)
221:)
205:)
173:)
157:)
134:)
108:)
1440:⚠
1419:(
1396:✉
1387:✍
1368:(
1317:(
1302:(
1287:(
1271:(
1234:(
1222:.
1204:(
1181:(
1169:.
1151:(
1128:(
1092:(
1080:.
1062:(
1032:(
1009:(
988:(
964:(
952:.
934:(
911:(
890:©
860:©
828:(
813:(
771:(
739:)
737:)
733:(
688:(
654:(
634:©
573:©
538:(
526:(
507:(
481:(
439:(
425:(
395:(
363:(
311:(
256:.
217:(
201:(
169:(
153:(
141:(
130:(
104:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.