User talk:PsychopathicAssassin

2763:

53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --

733:. By simply reverting all my editing without even trying to understand them, you have reinstated even spelling and grammar errors. I also notice that you have not yet engaged on the talk page for the article. I have started a new discussion about the structure of the article there, so it would be good to get some consensus responding to what I see are the problems with the article. I would also ask you to please be more careful in your reverting and take the time to understand why edits are being made rather than simply making wholesale reverts. I also note you have added a tag calling the article a "good article" and instructing other editors not to change it in any way, but as far as I can see this article has not actually been nominated for 4168:. There's a new bonus prize of $ 200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! 4338: 4121: 5137: 4495: 3705: 3174: 1321: 2714: 2219: 1149: 950: 906: 4455: 2835:. In particular, your edits include a lot of emphasis on commercial success even in sentences where its entirely unrelated, and you often claim that commercial success led to something happening when the sources don't say that directly. In order to make sure Knowledge is as reliable as possible, we don't allow such non-neutral language in our articles. Please do not revert back to the version of the article you created, but 1934: 5072: 4658: 801: 197: 4371: 3268: 5102: 4859: 3606: 2320: 2185: 234: 4743: 3790: 2400: 2116: 1559: 1189: 993: 4940: 4229: 4020: 2567: 851: 426: 380: 22: 705:

are both credited as such, or where is a source saying the series is a "thriller"? You've also removed some details of plot arcs for a couple of seasons without giving reasons, and changed headings like "overview" to "episodes" when what follows is not an episode list. Please discuss your proposed changes on the article talk page (see

4442:

mature editor and trying to clear this obvious truth while so much Messi fans fight against it because they can't deal with reality (not that it matters what they edit lol, in reality Ronaldo is widely considered as one of the candidates to be the best of all time and everything else...well...is meaningless anyway).

704:

without really explaining why (the first time you said it was to avoid spoilers, and the last time to "add extra info" but you have in fact removed info). You have not given reasons or references for your changes - for example, why have you removed Adams and Macht from the list of producers when they

4914:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

3936:

professional" is wrong from a grammatical point of view, and changes like "first player" to "first ever player" are unnecessary as first is the same as first ever. Removing a link to one of the clubs in the hatnote, is questionable. Essentially, the only real change you made was indicating that they

3661:

2762:

which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the

2375:

263:

2886:

You're misinformed in the topic of what's the difference between "digital sales" and "platinum certifications". A single being certified 3x platinum doesn't mean it has sold 3 million copies. Since May 2013 RIAA certifications for digital singles include on-demand audio and/or video song streams in

1432:

Thanks for the rewording of what i type and not taking it off. Someone decided to take off what i wrote and said that it was irrelevant when WWE, Eonline, and TMZ all promoted them being there. Also Brittany Snow Of Pitch Perfect Was There. She Was Backstage with Lana and Pitch Perfect I think she

4131:

I see you've been asked before to use edit summaries, yet you still make tons of edits that don't include them at all, which can be particularly worrisome when making major changes to a page. Please remember to use these in the future as it helps people get a better sense of what you're trying to

3132:

It therefore is possible to sell 2 million and receive a 5x Platinum certification because RIAA counts stream equivalent units in is certifications when they count 1 million UNITS (whether sales, equivalent units, or a combination of the two) for a platinum certification. Before May 2013, streams

4441:

Messi fans (and above all - Black Kite) will now block anyone of the hundreds of millions over the world who would edit Cristiano ronaldo's page to the obvious statement that Ronaldo has a fact! considered widely as the greatest. i want to thank you personally for being an objective, honest, and

3071:

And how do you think they got that 5x platinum number? They just pulled it out of thin air? As you have just described, the streaming, individual units, and on demand streaming ALL COUNT toward a SALE. Saying it sold 5 million copies is absolutely correct, as the RIAA only certify it due to the

3087:

Pure sales (aka traditional sales) exclude streams, so Cornerstonepicker actually is right. When talking about sales, Knowledge and other publications are referring to this unless they specifically indicate that the figure is based on equivalent units, which is what streams are. Maybe this

3378:

When you update statistics please remember that you should also update the timestamps as of when the stats are correct. This is done by manually updating the date above or below the statistics table. By doing this we show when the stats were last updated and it prevents other editors from

4383:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

441:, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the 395:, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the 770:

If you could contribute to the discussion on the talk page for the article that would be good, because while you keep saying your edits are "correct" you have not explained why. The current structure of the article is not correct according to the Manual of Style - see

1097:

Please see the reliable sources, including newspaper article and police booking report on the article talk page. Besides promotional materials, do you have any third-party (not published by MGK) sources indicating that "Richard" is not part of his legal name?

2293:, please note that we already have a reference called "Xhaka fee" defined some place else, so you should not add a second source with ther same reference name, as it causes a major collision. I have therefore remove the Holding and Xhaka source you added. 4009:

I will continue, however I wish and deem fit, to provide my great edits to this website, Walter. Also, for further reference, you misspelt "ass" and "planning" in your diatribe against my edits. I've fixed it for you, though. I am such a nice person :)

5180:

You have been engaging in a long pattern of disruptive editing for years, including repeated edit warring, obnoxious insults, copyright violations, and use of unreliable sources. Despite several blocks and many warnings, your behavior has not changed.

3280:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

2902: 2968:

listings, it clearly states a single/album is certified platinum by shifting 3 million units. These can either be physical copies, digital downloads, and streaming. RIAA also state that 1500 streams = 1 album sold. Please stop changing my

4795:

I see you're in a slow edit war with multiple editors about the lead in the Drake article. The 4-paragraph version presented by the first editor and restored by others is preferred. Take your concerns to the talk page, if you want.

1128:, all alumni who meet Knowledge's notability criteria "are to be included on an alumni list, regardless of how much time they have spent on a school roll, from one day to several years, and whether or not they graduated." Thanks, -- 724:

Hi again. Thanks for your message on my talk page, but I'm a little concerned about your comment about "enforcing" your edits and instructing me not to revert any of your edits. That is simply not how wikipedia works - you do not

755:

My apologies, looking through the edits in a bit more detail, I can see that the "good article" tag was not added you but by another editor (and it is that editor's only contribution to wikipedia). I will therefore remove it.

3133:

weren't counted towards the certifications, so certifications before that point indicated a minimum sales figure, but even then it didn't always show the exact count as lots of sales come between levels of certifications.

3523:

and it is clear why that film is regarded as a success. Also, there is no causal connection between critical success and commercial success, so using phrasing such as "Despite its commcercial success..." you are

1519:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 4411: 3308: 1843:, please do not mark edits that introduce or remove content as minor. Only edits such as typographical corrections, reversion of obvious vandalism and minor formatting changes should be labeled minor. Thanks. 1433:

may have gone to the bathroom or she was sitting down or something when that picture was taken but she was there too. Lana tweeted the picture MTV,WWE, Perez Hilton Eonline etc all has that on their website

2910: 1639:

STOP changing the name. This has already been discussed on the talk page and a consensus has been reached to leave Richard in. If you continue to edit against consensus you may be blocked from editing.

4395:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3519:

Financial success isn't "obvious", it is subjective based on a whole variety of factors i.e. the budget, the ancillary revenue, the profit margins etc and therefore it needs to be qualified. Look at

3292:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3990:. While teams in England and Europe pipe the "FC" or "F.C." out of their names, most North American teams do not. It is part of their name. You don't even know how to ping editors correctly. 173: 1918:

thread concerning some of your work on Knowledge. If you want to participate in that discussion I have provided a link to it below. Thanks for all of your time and support for Knowledge!

2518:

myslf, You've been told directly above this about BRD and yet have apparently ignored it, Edit warring can and will see you blocked so I would strongly advise you discuss your additions,

3532:. Please stop reverting editors and start a discussion on the article talk pages if you disagree with the reasons for the revert. Alternatively you can join the existing discussion at 3982:

You can laugh your ass off and whatever the trailing Os are about, but stay away from articles that you're planning on making a mess of such as Hudson River Derby. I'll point you to

2601:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

4165: 4158: 4325:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting

4108:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting

3682: 2758: 1296:

has been formulated on the talk page of the article that determines "Richard" should be included in the article. If you remove it without formulating a new consensus on the

2804:, please refrain from adding additional info on the Drake article. You clearly seem to dislike the subject in question, so you're doing nothing but hurting the article. 4782: 4701: 3825: 3008:

platinum. You can't just misinform readers saying "it has sold 5 million copies". That isn't accurate. What you said is how RIAA makes a formula for equivalent units.

2158: 1938: 1125: 813: 2731: 2232: 1162: 967: 923: 3932:

Your seventeen recent changes to the New York City FC article, many of which were small are a problem. Changing wording from "is an American professional" to "is

3937:

bowed out in the conference semi-finals. I reverted because of that. Feel free to modify in smaller groups and try to improve your writing style in the process.

1437: 105: 104: 3072:

amount it sold, in album equivalent units. ALBUM EQUIVALENT UNITS means the SAME AS A PHYSICAL COPY OF THE ALBUM. That's how you get the "5 million copies".

3110:

A song that is streamed 300 million times equates to 3 million streaming equivalent units. None of those streams involved downloading/purchasing the track.

2334:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 4233: 4024: 3964: 2571: 430: 384: 124:. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Knowledge works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and 71: 3949:- LMAOOO, telling an esteemed English professor who graduated with full honors from Stanford is being told how to correct my English. Sure, dude. Okay. 2786:

that it seems a fan wrote the whole article. Please, also stick to source. Don't write a whole sentence accompanied by a source that doesn't say that.

4580: 3902: 3575: 3423: 2906: 2682: 2259: 2050: 2009: 1964: 1809: 1764: 1719: 1674: 1473: 670: 625: 580: 535: 490: 3529: 1869:, the other source doesn't mention IYRTITL, you mention record brokens but not provide a source, don't understand RIAA includes streaming + sales, 4873:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 3620:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 4994: 1877:

by saying "the articles showcase how drake's ruled hip hop in today's age, and how it makes him great." Please, use this talk page to discuss.

1208:

with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Knowledge's

863: 209: 4882: 4694: 4576: 3898: 3798: 3629: 3571: 3419: 2678: 2343: 2255: 2046: 2005: 1960: 1805: 1760: 1715: 1670: 1469: 666: 621: 576: 531: 486: 280: 4485:

I think we need some higher intervention on this edit warring. they (Black Kite, Flannery) cannot control this page and decides for anyone!

308: 4985:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

4425: 3613: 3322: 2768: 1544: 4700:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Knowledge's

1892:

The pictures you added to the article have been reported as copyvio, as you uploaded them as personal work, and those are from the media.

834:. This kind of personal attack is wholly unacceptable. I see you've been editing wikipedia for almost a year - you should know better. 5161: 4523: 3733: 3202: 1353: 312: 5083:. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. 4627: 2249: 4781:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge's

3824:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge's

2992:

You clearly don't understand Knowledge. Your edits aren't untouchable facts, actually is a consensus. And stop ignoring the facts:

2815:

No, this happens with every article in WP. You're just inflating the article with wrong data. You're ignoring again WP guidelines.

2157:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge's

1219:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge's

307:

and excessive details. In such cases of disputes, please discuss and try to reach a consensus with the other editors either at the

4192:

parameter for international stats, by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks,

2039:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2872:

has no precedent to alter the remainder of the article, often removing whole sections. Please see that this is followed through.

241: 201: 4421: 3533: 3318: 2764: 1540: 300: 181: 3895:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4874: 4146: 3979:, which clearly displays my edits on New York City FC were substantiated and provided great merit to the article in question. 3751: 3621: 3568:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3416:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3220: 3146: 2675:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2451: 2335: 2252:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2043:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2002:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1957:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1802:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1757:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1712:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1667:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1610: 1466:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1438:

http://perezhilton.com/fitperez/2014-08-18-anna-kendrick-and-friends-with-pitch-perfect-costar-wwe-lana-the-ravishing-russian

1371: 1044: 871: 663:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 618:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 573:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 528:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 483:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 272: 1238:

which you have made repeatedly despite numerous objections and reversions. Please discuss it on the talk page or take it to

3892: 5041: 4611: 4272: 4055: 805: 5150: 4990: 4956: 4890: 4775: 4771: 4747: 4690: 4666: 4404: 3818: 3814: 3794: 3759: 3637: 3301: 3228: 2463: 2419: 2351: 2196: 2151: 2147: 2120: 1622: 1578: 1379: 1213: 1193: 1056: 1012: 288: 4623: 2975: 2839:

feel free to discuss this on the article's talk page and attempt to come to a compromise on your proposed changes. The

1870: 1531:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

5091: 4894: 4416: 3729: 3641: 3313: 3232: 3198: 3013: 2820: 2791: 2467: 2355: 1897: 1882: 1626: 1536: 1349: 1060: 292: 4829: 4354: 3995: 3942: 3037: 4271:. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The 4709: 3860: 3841: 3501: 3487: 3466: 2651:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!

1570: 1121: 656: 521: 177: 4566: 4054:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The

5145: 5107: 5000: 4902: 4801: 4790: 4713: 4503: 3956: 3833: 3809:

with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek

3763: 3712: 3649: 3181: 2987: 2959: 2881: 2810: 2782:

Seriously the "Widespread commercial success" and "Rave reviews" need to stop in that article. It is so close to

2473: 2363: 2190: 2166: 1866: 1632: 1383: 1328: 1232: 1066: 881: 251: 74: 3113:

Combining 2 million downloads with 3 million streaming equivalent units totals up to 5 million equivalent units.

880:

Please STOP your disruptive change to the name - as has been explained repeatedly - you need to provide a more

4952: 4759: 4678: 3806: 3525: 2132: 2040: 1205: 867: 737:

status, and it is not your place to tell other editors they cannot make changes. I do not wish to engage in an

213: 135: 4712:, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in 3875:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3556:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3408:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2667:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2244:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1994:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1949:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1794:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1749:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1704:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1659:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1458:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

655:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

610:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

565:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

520:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

475:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

174:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive850#User:Vranak_adding_non-free_content_to_his_user_page

28:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to

4866: 4283: 4212: 4197: 4066: 2609: 1705: 340: 205: 3888: 5154: 5087: 5037: 4986: 4944: 4907: 4886: 4885:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

4870: 4516: 4350: 4006: 3991: 3946: 3938: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3654: 3633: 3632:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

3617: 3194: 3190: 3066: 3009: 2869: 2816: 2801: 2787: 2459: 2431: 2407: 2385: 2368: 2347: 2346:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

2331: 1893: 1878: 1618: 1590: 1566: 1444: 1413: 1345: 1337: 1052: 1024: 1000: 364: 351: 316: 284: 283:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

256: 245: 220: 56: 5121: 4682: 4392: 4288: 4071: 3856: 3837: 3690: 3671: 3557: 3541: 3512: 3497: 3483: 3462: 3342: 3289: 2653: 2614: 3686: 3667: 3537: 5010: 4924: 4825: 4797: 4732: 4570: 4553:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

4539: 4308: 4091: 3952: 3876: 3248: 2634: 839: 821: 480: 343:; you have already been warned about your editing, and if you continue to edit disruptively then you 85: 4469: 4467:

I really appreciate u edited Cristiano Ronaldo's page where it clearly needed (one of the best : -->

5187: 4963:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 4960: 4878: 4767: 4686: 4473: 4331: 4327: 4114: 4110: 3810: 3755: 3625: 3520: 3224: 2455: 2423: 2415: 2339: 2225: 2218: 2143: 2138: 2058: 1614: 1582: 1574: 1532: 1375: 1293: 1228: 1133: 1048: 1016: 1008: 730: 566: 446: 400: 276: 4562: 4619: 4512: 4508: 4208: 4193: 4140: 3987: 3140: 2965: 2926: 2742: 2720: 2713: 1271: 1253: 142: 117: 2426:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

2204: 2170: 1919: 1585:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

1434: 1019:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

5056: 4844: 4642: 4596: 4379: 4318: 4268: 4252: 4244: 4101: 4043: 4035: 3983: 3918: 3591: 3439: 3276: 3258: 2783: 2698: 2644: 2590: 2582: 2381: 2275: 2100: 2025: 1980: 1825: 1780: 1735: 1690: 1508: 1499: 1489: 1440: 1424: 1409: 1209: 780: 761: 746: 714: 686: 641: 596: 551: 506: 361: 348: 304: 217: 153: 2847:

on articles, which is likely to lead to a block if it continues. Thanks and happy editing. ~

5167: 5117: 5113: 5080: 5029: 4948: 4751: 4662: 4529: 4388: 4313: 4264: 4096: 3739: 3454: 3392: 3361: 3285: 3208: 3166: 2639: 2411: 2303: 1795: 1528: 1512: 1359: 1114: 611: 459: 413: 324: 4403:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4337: 4120: 3300:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1527:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1227:

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through

5136: 5005: 4982: 4920: 4817: 4728: 4719: 4681:

with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the

4494: 4237: 4028: 3855:

got off a block for edit warring to maintain your synthesis. Do not start this up again.

3704: 3565: 3244: 3173: 2943: 2668: 2575: 2208: 2174: 2068: 1923: 1848: 1840: 1750: 1660: 1459: 1320: 835: 817: 772: 615: 438: 392: 81: 45: 41: 33: 4348:

You don't seem to care though. I just saw an editor blocked for repeatedly ignoring this.

360:

Sigh, please also don't use IP addresses to try and get around this - we are not stupid.

4573:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 4454: 884:

than the police record for your version of his name. Facebook is not a reliable source.

5182: 5112:

the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at

5033: 4911: 4763: 4670: 4615: 4468:

the best). Please make sure no one changes it back, because there's no logical reason.

4400: 4293: 4076: 3775: 3658: 3453:

Please don't add your own personal interpretation of review aggregators, as you did in

3297: 2832: 2619: 2545: 2524: 2479: 2372: 2200: 2124: 2064: 1524: 1516: 1392: 1306: 1197: 1129: 1073:

Please stop reverting your non sourced change to his name. discuss it on the articles

701: 442: 396: 260: 5194: 5125: 5095: 5060: 5018: 4928: 4848: 4805: 4736: 4646: 4600: 4542: 4477: 4429: 4358: 4216: 4201: 4152: 3999: 3968: 3922: 3864: 3845: 3782: 3694: 3675: 3595: 3545: 3505: 3491: 3470: 3443: 3398: 3365: 3326: 3252: 3152: 3017: 2858: 2824: 2795: 2772: 2746: 2727: 2702: 2657: 2536: 2491: 2389: 2309: 2279: 2212: 2178: 2104: 2029: 1984: 1927: 1901: 1886: 1852: 1829: 1784: 1739: 1694: 1649: 1548: 1493: 1448: 1417: 1394: 1308: 1278: 1177: 1137: 1106: 1091: 982: 963: 938: 919: 894: 843: 825: 784: 765: 750: 718: 690: 645: 600: 555: 510: 465: 419: 367: 354: 328: 223: 185: 157: 89: 5076: 4587: