100:
194:
Greetings - I wish to move the page you created on
Criticism of Science out of the Anti-Intellectual class, or at least discuss it. One of the points made in the talk section is the comparison of science to divination. Is it your purpose to make this type of judgement about science? If not, wouldn't
210:
That particular quote was from an article I didn't place there. It was there when I stumbled upon "criticisms of science" when it was still only a brief section of the science article. I read the paper it sourced, and I wouldn't say the author was making much of a judgment either, it was merely a
150:
and his ideas with the political philosophy of anarchism. Feyerabend was not an anarchist, and his philosophy of science did not advance anarchist political philosophy (he advocated democratic control of science). He used "anarchism" as part of the name of his epistemology as an intentionally
211:
comparison. I don't think there was any intention of having the comparison reflect negatively on science in that we should toss it out because its 'just divination', but that it is one form of divining knowledge among many, therefore we should keep our minds open.(
247:
The link "Blinded By
Science, How 'Balanced' Coverage Lets the Scientific Fringe Hijack Reality" does not work properly. I was going to change it but was afraid I'd mess it up. Discovery Magazine have a reproduction of the article. I found it through a
230:
I just recently reviewed
Criticism of Science and it appears improved. I think this is an important page and like your idea of expanding it with a history of science. If you like leave a message for me on my talk page or I can give you my email address
175:, I wanted to see what your thoughts are and if they have changes since your last post on this issue considering both pages have undergone revisions since you voiced your opinions. Please check it out and post any changes
114:
117:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
32:
88:
63:
131:
51:
176:
165:
110:
41:
28:
70:
212:
113:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
78:
59:
257:
236:
200:
106:
92:
58:. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our
23:
55:
184:
152:
74:
253:
232:
196:
147:
126:
171:
The discussion of the merge for this article has restarted again after a posting on the
180:
261:
240:
220:
204:
188:
159:
136:
82:
99:
121:
45:
and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content.
146:
Greetings, PoS. I am afraid I have had to revert your edits associating
172:
120:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
151:
provocative analogy, not meant to be taken at face value. Best,
50:
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our
27:, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our
115:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Criticisms of
Science
195:it be better to edit this out of the article.
69:If you have any questions, please contact an
8:
17:Speedy deletion of "Downward causality"
31:. In particular, it meets one or more
7:
109:, an article that you created, for
64:guide to writing your first article
14:
98:
1:
241:20:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
160:16:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
35:; the relevant criterion is:
33:criteria for speedy deletion
262:00:17, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
277:
83:05:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
73:for assistance. Thank you
221:04:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
166:Talk:Criticism of science
137:02:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
216:
205:20:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
189:02:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
142:Feyerabend and anarchism
60:introduction to editing
107:Criticisms of Science
93:Criticisms of Science
89:Articles for deletion
56:inclusion guidelines
21:A page you created,
54:and any applicable
24:Downward causality
105:I have nominated
268:
213:ProductofSociety
157:
156:
134:
129:
124:
102:
52:content policies
276:
275:
271:
270:
269:
267:
266:
265:
169:
154:
153:
148:Paul Feyerabend
144:
132:
127:
122:
103:
96:
42:Patent nonsense
29:deletion policy
19:
12:
11:
5:
274:
272:
250:
249:
244:
243:
227:
226:
225:
224:
168:
163:
143:
140:
97:
95:
91:nomination of
86:
48:
47:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
273:
264:
263:
259:
255:
246:
245:
242:
238:
234:
229:
228:
222:
218:
214:
209:
208:
206:
202:
198:
193:
192:
191:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
167:
164:
162:
161:
158:
149:
141:
139:
138:
135:
130:
125:
118:
116:
112:
108:
101:
94:
90:
87:
85:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:administrator
67:
65:
61:
57:
53:
46:
44:
43:
38:
37:
36:
34:
30:
26:
25:
16:
251:
207:TDurden1937
170:
145:
119:
104:
75:Loren.wilton
68:
49:
40:
39:
22:
20:
254:TDurden1937
233:TDurden1937
197:TDurden1937
231:somehow.--
179:. Thanks.
181:Tiggerjay
177:over here
155:Skomorokh
173:helpdesk
111:deletion
248:Google.
258:talk
237:talk
217:talk
201:talk
185:talk
79:talk
62:and
123:EMS
260:)
252:--
239:)
219:)
203:)
187:)
81:)
66:.
256:(
235:(
223:)
215:(
199:(
183:(
133:4
128:2
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
