User talk:Prosfilaes - Knowledge (XXG)

3111: 5028:. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the 4397:, for me very interesting when i read it for the first time 4 years ago, being speedy deleted. The reason was "not relevant because I can't find any thesis or many articles about this report on the internet" (so articles are relevant only if you find thesis about it? why not adding a button "you've reached the end of the article, do you think this was relevant to you?" and let readers decide?). I guess they didn't quite like the conclusion from that economist and the wanted it out of view. 3468:

concern and ignored the obnoxiousness. And you reverted, providing no explanation. Please engage in discussion instead of edit warring, which is when you just revert (fight), and do not communicate (cooperate) so as to try to reach consensus. If you're going to defend having information in two articles on territories, and in one article on states, then do it by discussing the merits thereof, or by reverting and discussing the merits thereof, but not by just reverting.--

2666: 2864: 2562: 1519: 159: 4115: 2134: 4047: 2071: 1655: 5169: 5081: 4939: 4851: 4763: 4651: 4578: 4505: 4440: 1803: 1008: 3634:

concern and ignored the obnoxiousness. And you reverted, providing no explanation. Please engage in discussion. If you're going to defend having information in two articles on territories, and in one article on states, then do it by discussing the merits thereof, or by reverting and discussing the merits thereof, but not by just reverting. Can you address my concerns with your edit? --

4381:

another way for skeptics to insult Esperanto." and "Too argumentative in a section about criticism, it's a bit ironic... Is it better to criticise without arguments?". If there's a criticism section I believe, in order to be serious and objective, that there should be both points of view (separated or every critic followed with an objective countercritic as I think I did for example).

2981: 2907:

says nothing about not asking about Commons images and the given description of "A place for help with image copyrights, tagging, STBotI, non-free content, and related questions." seems to fit just fine. Whilst Commons may be the best place to answer some questions, it should be perfectly possible to answer those about US copyright (in particular) at MCQ. Since a given question is a

5045:

wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like

1572: 916: 843: 3680: 3998: 3425: 5255: 300: 2600:(which I support), you refer to the redirects at issue as "cross-wiki redirects". They're not. All of the redirects are within Knowledge (XXG). They don't for example, redirect to another language's wikipedia or to a non-Knowledge (XXG) project like Wiktionary. I think the term you were looking for was "cross-namespace redirects". 3654:

matter what words I use to do so? I ask because knowing if it's a) or b), then I can perhaps come to see a good reason for your use of those terms. Please don't reply if you're not willing to answer a) / b). If you're not willing to discuss your edit, no matter what words I use to do so, then I don't want to ask any more. --

5044:

The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your

3711:

Hi, Prosfilaes. Elvey and I are going back and forth on the talk page of this article, still. I'm growing weary, but he's still trying to remove the sourced material both you and I have restored, in favor of his unrelated material about states' works. Would you be willing to join the discussion? I

2938:

An image that's not in the public domain in the US needs to be deleted from Commons. I think you would be quite annoyed if discussions started up on Commons about Knowledge (XXG) articles that were copyvios that never got fed back to Knowledge (XXG). If a picture is on Commons, the discussions on its

1481:

Also it just needs to give an overview. This is what ethnologue says, there is already discussion about the number of speakers in the section. In the summery it seems not useful to me to have big debates about numbers, and personally i find the etnhologue number more trustworthy than any other source

403:

and borderline personal attacks. I interpret the consensus on AfD as being that Bagh (word) was crap; unlike that, Bagh (garden) might have some encyclopedic potential. Instead of more accusations about the supposed "will of the community" (coming from someone who stomped off a few months ago because

61:

Hi there! Thanks for your note. I'm happy to change the license to whatever is necessary. The work is entirely my own, and I'd like it to stay on Knowledge (XXG). On my website (www.radicalcartography.net), all my maps are by default CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 .. but I'm happy to give special permissions as

4388:

Well, that said, as i posted on fb too, I do not understand why there is not a criticism section for the main articles about English, Spanish, French, etc., big ethnic languages that are playing a role they weren't born for... a role as international (or interpeoples/interethnic) communication tool.

4384:

The French article about Esperanto does not show any criticism section but they do have a separated article only about it (with counterarguments to see both views and let the reader know and maybe even choose). The Spanish and English wikipedias show that section in the main article about esperanto,

2906:

I'm afraid I find you comment that my suggestion was "inappropriate" rather impolite. There are good reasons why one might want to come to MCQ (where I am a sometime answerer). Most notably, we cannot expect contributors to use Commons, they may only be on Knowledge (XXG); second, the header of MCQ

471:

Airplanes are not like your car, they don't just rot away and eventually fall out of the sky when they reach some magic age. We maintain them, upgrade them, and replace parts as they age. Besides that, we don't measure their ages in years, but in pressurization cycles. A heavily-used aircraft wears

3458:

I see you reverted me and I'm upset by your edit summary, "revert to longer, more descriptive text," which is not a substantive explanation, IMO. What's the logic behind insisting on having the same detailed (that is, "longer, more descriptive") information in two articles on territories, and in

2519:

which has been there since January and has presumably been seen by every editor watching that page. Whilst I don't share the sentiments expressed, I do recognize it as humour which is only mildly disparaging of some citizens of the USA. I have in the past seen far, far worse comments on talk pages

1422:

Hi Prosfilaes -- sorry about failure to provide an edit summary. That book and its author got pages made and references batched all over the place in two waves, basically by two usernames -- as one editor comented, it looked pretty self-serving. I was taking Grigsby out of a list that consisted of

2686:

will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!

1477:

Ethnologue is a good source according to my viewpoint on language subject, also if you want to change that, just change that, right now you are also destroying many new links I and also other persons made. So instead of just wiping everything i would prefer it if you talked to me or talked on the

1193:

Your understanding of art is fundamentally scewed. Any art which abuses a child (A child cannot have the emotional maturity to allow herself to be photographed nude, never mind the sexual understanding) is not art. Its sexual abuse. This is what is at stake here. Nobody is waging some war against

633:

Thank you for catching that. The article did read 'Saudia' in the past, and now only uses 'Saudi Arabian Airlines' instead of 'Saudia' in 2-3 places. This can be changed using a find and replace. If you prefer not to make the edits yourself or are unable to do so, I will do it within the next few

3653:

Wow. You to describe the above comment of 18:10, 19 August 2013! a)Is it your contention that it's the words I just used when I tried to ask about your edit that are "Bitching and Harassing?" b)Is it your contention that the fact that I just did so here, inherently "Bitching and Harassing" no

467:

I wasn't trying to editorialize or present a half-truth; Most of the aircraft in our fleet are 25+ years old. We inspect them on a mandated schedule and get fined or penalized when we don't -- Just look at the recent American Airlines incident for a good example of this. AA got busted skating on

4380:

Undid revision 698119454 by 62.37.217.199 (talk); You said the reason was "too argumentative in a section about criticism". Here's what two Esperanto learners from Duolingo commented on my fb post about this: "I like your version a LOT better. The version on the page now seems irrational, just

3728:

I tried to add something -- which I thought was useful -- to the "Eskimo Words for Snow" article. Between Maunus and now you -- I GIVE UP. Fine. Please consider that you've merely REMOVED content, possibly useful to those looking up this entry -- you've NOT contributed, edited, cited, added, or

3633:

where it belongs, adding the edit summary, "Info in the main article. (See previous edit.) Refine wording and rm. redundancy.)". In response to the wholesale revert and obnoxious comment "unsourced and completely wrong; there is no constitutional issue, it's purely statutory" I addressed the

3467:

3501:

Ok, there was a series of reverts that you participated in merely to the extent that you made one revert which I guess makes sense if you hadn't seen the bigger picture. I won't call it edit warring if you prefer. Now that I've tried to provide some context, and struck the 'warring', can you

3435:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. Please join us to help form a

4590:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4663:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

818:

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Knowledge (XXG) DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the

2826:

Why did you delete my edits, stating my source was "unreliable." My source is well documented and comes with a very reliable bibliography filled with primary sources, including Jefferson's memoirs, correspondence, and a ton of other sources both contemporary and secondary.

4188: 791:

What do you think remain in the language proposal policy - community draft for its approval? remember, it does not matter our personal views as much, but the best arguments do. we can't afford to spend years bickering over minor details. please reply in the talk page.

2336:. Frankly, your page doesn't sell itself well, given that it looks only like a collection of links. There are several other sites that have produced PG books that aren't linked, and I think that the article would be better served by a narrow collection of links.-- 128:

If you looked at what was on the talk page you'd have seen that the flickr user is saying he took the photo in Feb 2007 at the Werder spring festival - a festival which doesn't take place until April, and Madonna wasn't on tour in 2007. In any case we have a

2228:

why we were reverting their edits and the content had been in place for years AFAICT. It's no surprise no one else was there to revert instead of you, if reverting what is pretty obviously vandalism in the form of censorship ends up with you being blocked.

4737:, it now displays the physical track names in the Line parameter. Nowadays if the service and line names match, the line parameter is blanked in order to reduce redundancy. Note that it just took a while for me to get around to editing Boston templates. 5262: 4517:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

4452:

4258:

page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia.

4013:, so it has been removed. Knowledge (XXG) needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 5055:

page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.

5038: 3975:

I don't care what any WikiProject says if it involves posting knowingly false material. That template says "Incidents resulting in at least 50 deaths shown in italics"; so long as it says that, it's a lie for those incidents not to be in

1194:

free speech here - we are defending the rights of the vulnerable, who are and have been exploited when they are incapable of understanding or making their own minds up on these difficult issues. I have responded on the image talk page.

1733:

Hello, the reason I changed the maximum estimate to "1000" is that is the highest figure I saw sourced elsewhere in the article. The claim as it stands now doesn't appear to have any citation whatsoever. It has to be backed up by a

2088:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the

1672:

3814: 3807: 1754:

You have't answered this query, but you're still reverting out cite tags from the article. Facts must be verified, especially hard figures like you are presenting. Without a valid reference, they can be challenged and deleted.

4253:

and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on

2493: 1773:

The infobox is a summary of information in the article. You don't put citations in the infobox for the sake of clarity. I don't see if you insist on all the citations being duplicated in the introduction, why you can't copy them

698:. It is quite usual in Knowledge (XXG) to mark as links years, countries etc. When I see in Knowledge (XXG) a year number without link, I always think that it is a little flaw and often add the link. Why don't you like this? -- 1397: 1400:

to a discussion that you participated in, I thought I should let you know. Apologies, as that page is very long. You can find the relevant discussion by searching on that page for discussion around the phrase "WP:DELETE".

3903:: if 'crew' is seen as 'the group', 'it' would be correct. However, 'crew' can also designate the people in the group, in which case 'they' is better. So, your edit makes sense, but the summary was (in my opinion) flawed. 1985:

Although the United States notably applies the rule that all images before 1923 are public domain, they apply the life + 70 years rule in addition to it. On the other hand, if it's less than 70 years in the template, the

5032:

and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made,

1920: 219:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on

2209:

The problem being that there are so many more people willing to block someone then to actually mediate; how much more effective it could have been to post to the talk page about the issues instead of wildly swinging a

745:

has been nominated for deletion. I have noticed you working to help other D&D deity articles get kept, in the past. If there is anything you can do to improve this article so that it may be kept, please do so. :)

3162: 1586: 858: 559:? I hope this revision of the text is somewhat responsive to the core of critical comments you've tried to express? Perhaps you'll be able to see that I've at least tried to figure out what caused you to reference 5214: 5126: 5034: 4982: 4894: 4806: 4691: 4618: 4545: 4480: 3194:

regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is

535:

or by phone: 08-94889353, please notify me about what he says because I'm interested the article should remain accessible(maybe you know how to host it on a different address and correct the link to it). Thank You

3104: 4337:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3100: 180:

in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

3712:

don't know if he's unreachable or if it's just that I'm failing to reach him. I'm hoping someone else knowledgeable trying to explain from a different angle would help. He's clearly not getting it from me.

931: 4242:

have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about

472:

out much faster than one that sits around idle. I guess I could provide some maintenance logs or something as a source, but I'm not sure I would be allowed to do that, and I don't want to risk my job.

5198:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5110:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4966:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4878:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4790:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4675:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4602:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4529:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4464:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3169: 3483:

Excuse me, edit warring? I've edited that article once this year, and gripping about my edit summary is pretty outrageous when the edit I reverted said "Correction", when in fact it was a revert.--

475:

I guess I'm unsure what you want me to do. I'm new to this whole wiki thing, I'm a pilot, and I just want to help people understand what happened without being biased or sensationalistic about it.

226:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 563:. You may notice that I've added to the categories and to the stub-tags; and maybe we can hope that these additions will attract the attention of editors willing to help improve this article.-- 4220:

is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west.

5183: 5095: 4952: 4864: 4776: 3845: 2489: 3623:

What's the logic behind insisting on having the same detailed (that is, "longer, more descriptive") information in two articles on territories, and in only one article at all on states?

3919:, which often is considered to be an error. "crew" is a singular noun (the plural is "crews"), thus requires a singular pronoun ("it" - as "he" and "she" shouldn't fit). But well... - 1101:

to deal with parts of my fellow editor's complaints. I don't know what I'm supposed to do when the fellow editor prefers to blindly revert every one of my changes without discussion.

982:: this applies even if you think or know you are correct. Edit warring helps nobody, and actually harms the page in question, and the encyclopedia. To contest this block please place 2597: 3760:;-(. OTOH: it WOULD be particularly more useful if people -- such as maybe yourself -- focused on POSITIVE contributions. Fix stuff. Make it better. Vs. being righteous Wiki-cops. 716:

As for me, it is quite normal to create the same links in DIFFERENT SECTIONS of the same article. Maybe, a reader reads only one section and does not notice links in other sections.

4030:

You mean a personal attack like the last post on my talk page? You repeatedly changed a page so it contained lies. Repeatedly. I'm not sure how I was supposed to be nicer to you.--

1455: 5275:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

4302:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

3849: 367:

rv. You must not put the existence of something to vote and then so blatantly change the nature of the entry on which people had been voting!!!! Please have respect for others!!!!

1372: 518: 5041:. This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress. 4059: 3825:) that 900 + 56 + 9 = 1,000 when the original and correct number is 965. I am considering this vandalism. Please let us let the issue drop here. Thanks and Happy New Year.-- 3741:

Think, please, about this: you, and Maunus, deleted a LOT of info. Probably almost all of which was relevant and accurate, and which was NOT from ME -- y'all just dove into

1822:

No evidence that this fairly recent chess variant is notable. Only one short mention in a newspaper article, no evidence of any awards or other things that may help to meet

820: 4006: 392:

I note nothing in his responses that pertains to content, and it starts out by saying that changing the article content lacks respect for others, a clear violation of

5052: 268: 3630: 3615: 3464: 3452: 1543:

Someone is after arcane US copyright info. I have asked for the hard data, and would appreciate you providing a view point when the data is provided. Thanks. :-)

4297: 3629:

info on the states ( with the edit summary, " CA, FL incl. Page moved"), and that was reverted. I removed redundant info - redundant because it is on the page

3463:

info on the states ( with the edit summary, " CA, FL incl. Page moved"), and that was reverted. I removed redundant info - redundant because it is on the page

5270: 3737:

DS - I quote, from your own talk page (slight paraphrase): "those who don't like unnecessary drama, shouldn't go around creating unnecessary drama". Heh. : -->

3549: 3756:

Seems like more than a few people on y'all's pages have similar observations.) Now, back up, to what you deleted: that's subtraction from WP -- not addition.

2635:

Your contribution history at Wikisource reveals you to be an infrequent contributor there, so I am informing you here that you have received a request there.

1156:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

3394: 1947: 213: 3759:

Knowledge (XXG) isn't particularly useful if self-appointed pedants go on delete-patrol for everything that's inadequately (or 'incorrectly') sourced : -->

4734: 3432: 3216: 3196: 3191: 2810: 2719: 500:

I've just started a new section on the 2008 Hurricane Season talk page to clarify why I made the change I did. Please have a look when you get a chance.

192: 4235:

as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part.

1882: 1238:, and helped to overturn the initial deletion. I just wanted to let you know that today, the article was successfully turned into a Good Article. :) 3621:

I see you reverted me and I'm upset by your edit summary, "revert to longer, more descriptive text," which is not a substantive explanation, IMO.

5029: 2520:

that have survived and which have not produced any comment. I suspect that you may be being a little over zealous to the extent that it feels like

2387:, I do note that consistency across the number articles should be maintained. Accordingly, this is an issue probably best opened for discussion at 1638:

I don't care about Mike Patton or Wolfmother. Don't post to my talk page to discuss what goes in an article; that goes in the article talk space.--

3874:, but so far I'm not finding one that matches the conditions you originally described. Can you help me figure out how this file should be tagged? 2568: 2561: 1048: 36: 3384: 4393:. Do you think the Spanish Knowledge (XXG) editors would accept that section for every article about those three languages? One year ago i saw 2648: 2303:

Hi there -- saw you removed the link to FreeLiterature.org, reason being EL's to linklists aren't the policy. In this case: FreeLiterature.org

2190: 1214: 1141: 618:

If you're unable to do so, I'll undertake the move myself within a week or so. If you have any concerns, please leave a note on my talk page.

238: 234: 177: 3390: 2881: 2575: 2540:

It is an edit that, as you admit, is hostile to people of a certain nationality. It contributes nothing to the creation of an encyclopedia.--

1536: 330:

I have explained it several times; this is Bagh (garden), not Bagh (word). What bagh means in Turkish might not be completely out of line on

3380: 2388: 5237: 5149: 5005: 4916: 4828: 4726: 4705: 4632: 4362: 1924: 608: 3576: 2256: 376:

this isn't Bagh (word), which was going to get deleted, and this isn't a dictionary. None of this entomological trivia has any place here

122: 4289: 2284: 2199: 2123: 1260:

Would you be able to comment on the talkpage why ACE should be kept in the seasonal predictors part of the article please - Many thanks

479: 5025: 3780: 3589: 4263: 2911:, I would therefore ask that you only direct users to Commons where strictly necessary and do so in a more polite manner. Thank you. 2252: 1886: 603:

For consistency's sake, it's preferable to use the name of the airline at the time of the accident. For example, accidents involving

3821:

entry) that 1,600 + 81 + 11 = 1,700 as opposed to the correct math which says 1,600 + 81 + 11 = 1,692. You are also saying (for the

3099:(DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are 2968: 2053: 2016:

I've replaced the "Do not move to commons" templates with those that will actually display the year when it becomes public domain. "

2005: 1928: 1501: 1195: 1126: 587: 5266: 4293: 3792:

Has all life on Earth descended from a single bacterium that mutated to make the final optimization in the universal genetic code?

3032: 2162: 2094: 1678: 446:

Hi, I've never done a 2nd nomination before so not sure about the procedure. I did list on AfD but it disappeared. Will try again.

1116:. They will help you to cope with conflict without getting involved in edit-wars, which are disruptive and counterproductive. — 3593: 2367: 1989: 1043: 4051: 5233: 5145: 5001: 4912: 4824: 4701: 4628: 4358: 4093:

Have not introduced any falsehoods. You have however accused me three times falsely of something. I'm getting an administrator.

2927: 2892: 2870: 2863: 2636: 385:

You are acting against the will of the community. If you have a point, lay it out in the talk page and let the community decide

5207: 5119: 4975: 4887: 4799: 4684: 4611: 4538: 4473: 3387:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3044: 3000: 2787: 2673: 2655: 2102: 973: 662:

page and subarticles as well. Can you take a look and see if you think it complies with WP policies? The image is located at:

2776: 1354: 1329: 1235: 712:

Thank you for the reply. I have somewhat other thought about links, but I don't insist. I'd like to note only the following:

3579:

regarding including navigation boxes for adaptations of and related subjects to an authors works on the author's bio page.--

3048: 2178: 2106: 1874: 1814: 1792: 1674: 1669: 597:. The name of the airline at the time of the accident (1980) was, in fact, Saudia (1972-1996) — not Saudi Arabian Airlines. 205: 2804: 51: 1878: 1578: 1564: 173: 4144: 3776: 3684: 3557: 3061: 461: 212:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

4349:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3054: 2251:

Instead of repeatedly reverting, you could have asked for help from the WikiProjects under whose aegis the page falls,

2141: 2112: 1696: 1582: 1021: 927: 854: 719:

Explain me, please, by what a rule should we decide which years should be marked as links and which ones should not. --

130: 5219: 5131: 4987: 4899: 4811: 4696: 4623: 4550: 4485: 4354: 3818: 896:) that the (2008) is not necessary in the name above the infobox. So please do not revert the change anymore, thanks. 724: 703: 186: 168: 97: 32: 2996: 2311:

producing e-text for PG, and looking for people to help out with that. If you want, you can contact Michael (Hart) -

1015: 103:

You removed the PROD on the grounds that lack of neutrality is not a reason to delete. I disagree on this point as

3822: 3363:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3110: 2888: 1302: 1020:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

158: 107:

is a strict policy. And, in any case, this was just one of several stated reasons to delete. Please reconsider.

47: 3548:

I've started an RfC concerning what should Knowledge (XXG)'s policy be on the use of non-free Bible translations:

1447: 870: 281: 4064:

Any further attacks on me will get you reported to Knowledge (XXG) authorities, either ANI or an administrator.

3040: 3012: 2988: 2959:

Yea, that was more of a reply to Supportstrom, but what did you mean "please don't make such changes as minor"?

2090: 2085: 2076: 4148: 1717: 1062: 440: 112: 5195: 5107: 4963: 4875: 4787: 4672: 4599: 4526: 4461: 3871: 3865: 315:. I know you were strongly supportive of deleting the page, but misrepresenting the consensus is unhelpful. 3553: 2992: 2482: 939: 901: 483: 427: 4390: 3764: 3215:

Since some approve of the graph, others don't, and I'm to close to it, I've asked for an assessment at the

2355: 1497: 1489: 799: 24: 5250:

File:1907, Vladimir Becic, Akt djevojke kod stola, ulje, Moderna galerija Zagreb.jpg listed for discussion

3797: 3585: 2363: 2322: 1549: 1525: 1518: 1451: 1384: 720: 699: 677: 529: 508: 28: 4350: 3036: 3004: 2271: 2098: 1890: 1682: 1368: 1338: 1309: 5280: 2963: 2769: 2279: 2194: 2118: 2048: 2000: 1932: 1485:

So please talk instead of undoing everything I and other people made to improve the Esperanto article.

1482:

i have seen. A research by one german student seems to be less trusty then this authoraty on language.

1199: 1178: 1122: 968: 4010: 2598:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 March 13#Pedophilia and child sexual abuse in fiction

1855: 1660: 560: 3749:

mode (deleting not just my para, but a bunch of other ones from other contributors, too. Emphasis on "

3685:

Talk:Jones Law (Philippines)#Topical importance re nature of and terminology describing the PhilAm War

3674:

Talk:Jones Law (Philippines)#Topical importance re nature of and terminology describing the PhilAm War

1493: 4745: 4307: 4255: 3691: 3572: 3068: 2832: 2359: 2318: 1952: 1627: 1406: 1265: 1168:|Yes, I should have used the talk page more and I will discuss the problematic edits in the future.}} 863: 600:

The commenter on the talk page who suggested that the page be moved was mistaken in suggesting this.

541: 276: 5177: 5089: 4946: 4858: 4770: 4659: 4586: 4513: 4495: 4448: 4430: 4326: 4317: 3597: 2154: 1113: 964: 4400: 4014: 3920: 3848:

regarding an image I wanted to upload. You concluded it would be safe this year, and so I uploaded

3349: 2923: 1866: 1843: 1702: 1585:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 1443: 1428: 991: 930:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 857:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 108: 86: 71: 5191: 5103: 5024:

Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined

4959: 4871: 4783: 4668: 4595: 4522: 4457: 4346: 4330: 2712: 2524:. Can I ask that you revisit that edit with slightly more rose-tinted spectacles on ? Many thanks 979: 923: 4730: 4404: 4274: 4189:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Robert Young (longevity claims researcher) (2nd nomination)

3924: 3906: 3882: 3856: 2694: 2501: 2037: 2026:

Finally, when a work is already PD in the source country with 70+ applied, might I suggest using

1463: 1348: 1323: 1292: 1284: 935: 897: 850: 793: 604: 451: 311:

and discussing at the talk page. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been

272: 271:, as I've found evidence that Gallaher has been a finalist in several other awards including the 144: 3007:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

955: 1618:

is not notable enough to report in either article, nor is David Brin's opinion about the movie

1371:

or otherwise been involved with tropical cyclone articles, please nominate and review pages at

659: 5064: 4559: 3830: 3793: 3580: 3410: 2234: 1851: 1756: 1739: 1597: 1544: 1377: 893: 769: 673: 639: 623: 612: 583: 504: 308: 5203: 5115: 4971: 4883: 4795: 4680: 4607: 4534: 4469: 4342: 4334: 3601: 2723: 2278:

vandalism". Edits with which you disagree, even if they are disruptive, are not vandalism. —

2260: 1966:

No problem about undoing my edit about Colin... but he is back. NHC site is having issues...

104: 5276: 5226: 5138: 4994: 4906: 4818: 4389:

There's a lot writen about inequalities in so many fields caused by this role playing, even

4140: 3948: 3772: 3441: 2960: 2665: 2644: 2583: 2398: 2184: 2043: 1995: 1174: 1165: 1150: 1117: 568: 320: 5206:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5199: 5118:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5111: 5046: 4974:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4967: 4886:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4879: 4798:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4791: 4683:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4676: 4610:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4603: 4537:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4530: 4472:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4465: 4345:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4338: 2708: 2704: 2333: 2166: 1832: 1560: 419: 400: 393: 4739: 4725:, the Line parameter is still being used, albeit with the notable track names. Currently, 4415: 4303: 4243: 4239: 4232: 4228: 4221: 4217: 4213: 4076: 4031: 3977: 3688: 3659: 3639: 3577:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Novels#Derivative works and cultural references templates

3529: 3507: 3484: 3473: 3224: 3065: 2940: 2843: 2828: 2616: 2541: 2465: 2457: 2442: 2432: 2417: 2337: 2211: 2133: 1971: 1775: 1639: 1623: 1402: 1261: 1026: 777: 537: 405: 248: 4250: 3096: 2174: 2170: 2150: 1735: 1690: 1686: 1279:

Hi. I've started a discussion regarding the Novyy God paragraph that you re-instated in

1213:

For your interest. I've read some Chinese materials for Hmong, and adds some comments in

214:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

172:. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of 4231:

we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around

4114: 3550:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Non-free content/Archive 60#RfC: Use of non-free Bible translations

3190:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

4195: 4174: 4128: 4094: 4066: 4021: 4002: 3966: 3717: 3345: 3200: 2919: 2605: 2029: 1916: 1898: 1831:

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

1665: 1424: 312: 303:

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Knowledge (XXG), as you did to

82: 67: 62:

needed. I would like there to be a attribution and a link to the map's original page (

3459:

only one article at all on states? (Consider the respective populations.) I added a

2070: 1823: 1654: 1234:

Hi there. :) I noticed that you had participated in the deletion review of the module

4270: 4058:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please 3939:

Sorry, I didn't know where the template was located... Also, my edit didn't violated

3878: 3401:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3364: 2497: 1459: 1343: 1318: 1288: 1280: 1243: 880: 828: 751: 447: 343: 335: 304: 292: 260: 140: 5263:

File:1907, Vladimir Becic, Akt djevojke kod stola, ulje, Moderna galerija Zagreb.jpg

2492:. It was kept, but I have renominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at 1802: 404:

his copyvios were getting deleted), I'd like to see some reason to keep that text.--

5060: 4555: 3826: 3406: 3402: 3376: 3372: 3103:, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to 2800: 2528: 2351:

It's about free literature - we don't sell - narrow views do enerve me - later :)

2230: 1810: 1796: 1593: 1218: 635: 619: 556: 63: 5168: 5080: 5039:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP)

4938: 4850: 4762: 4650: 4577: 4504: 4439: 4224:

are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures.

4046: 17: 5037:. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name 4246:

from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same.

4075:

When I tell you you're adding falsehoods to an article, comment on the content.--

137:

taken by that flickr user and that the rights are owned by the Associated Press.

4385:

and they also have separated articles for further (almost repeated) criticism.

4212:

This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named

4132: 3944: 3768: 3437: 2393: 2315: 2314:, who personally helped setting up this site. Thanks for reconsidering... Marc ( 2312: 2264: 2225: 1611: 564: 533: 423: 339: 316: 4262:

This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in

1571: 915: 842: 666: 5048:

frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.

4394: 4162: 3655: 3635: 3525: 3503: 3469: 3220: 2761: 2521: 2516: 2494:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The Very Secret Diaries (2nd nomination)

2461: 2428: 2413: 2384: 1967: 1615: 773: 242: 1861:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1398:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The Shells (folk band) (2nd nomination)

892:

If you read the talk page, we've reached an agreement (and it's backed up by

694:

Explain me, please, why did you delete wiki-links added by me in the article

4191: 4170: 3815:

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities

3808:

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities

3723: 3713: 3368: 3022:; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. 2601: 2412:

How can you say I censored this article? I did not delete the picture... --

1919:

has been nominated for deletion again, as part of a series of AFDs based on

1894: 1094: 742: 695: 772:

you'll see that a similar label was there for 2 days with no obejections.--

3062:

Talk:Jones Law (Philippines)#Another revert, and a warning re edit warring

2101:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

1685:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

16:

Yes I, Mark L. Knowles, took this picture of deadheads at Red Rocks here:

3035:

to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents

2966: 2158: 2081: 1587:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Acetylseryltyrosylseryliso...serine

1239: 859:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Michael Q. Schmidt (2nd nomination)

824: 747: 591: 5283: 5254: 5241: 5210:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5153: 5122:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5068: 5035:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe

5009: 4978:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4920: 4890:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4832: 4802:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4748: 4709: 4687:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4636: 4614:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4563: 4541:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4476:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4423: 4408: 4366: 4311: 4278: 4199: 4178: 4169:

See edit comment re: "plane". This has nothing to do with Americanisms.

4152: 4097: 4084: 4069: 4039: 4024: 3997: 3985: 3969: 3952: 3928: 3909: 3886: 3834: 3801: 3701: 3663: 3643: 3606: 3561: 3533: 3511: 3492: 3477: 3445: 3414: 3353: 3228: 3205: 3078: 2970: 2948: 2932: 2896: 2877: 2851: 2836: 2624: 2609: 2586: 2549: 2534: 2505: 2469: 2450: 2436: 2421: 2402: 2371: 2345: 2326: 2288: 2238: 2219: 2203: 2127: 2058: 2010: 1975: 1956: 1936: 1902: 1783: 1768: 1723: 1647: 1631: 1601: 1554: 1532: 1505: 1467: 1432: 1410: 1386: 1356: 1331: 1296: 1269: 1247: 1224: 1203: 1182: 1131: 996: 943: 905: 875: 832: 803: 781: 755: 728: 707: 681: 643: 627: 572: 545: 512: 487: 455: 431: 413: 324: 299: 286: 254: 148: 116: 90: 75: 40: 5187:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5099:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4956:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4868:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4780:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4333:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

3916: 3868:

to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.

3020:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made

1416: 655: 227: 3424: 2307:

links to other sites providing free e-books, but the main occupation

525: 338:. If you'll note the AfD, there was a movement to continue to delete 3724:

OK, I'm done battling (noun deleted) / WP-otaku -- you win, kthxbye.

1396:

Hi. I'm not sure if we have ever met, but as I've just referred at

3095:. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in 2023:

In addition, I've found a middle ground for the PD-old-70 template.

1592:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

932:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Kamau Kambon (2nd nomination)

611:. Could you please move the article back to its former location at 3524:

No, meaningful communication is too much to ask for, it seems. --

3431:

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the

3109: 2700:

Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?)

3862:, but I just noticed a very important warning in that template: " 351:

I furthermore take offense to the fact that the edit summaries go

5223:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 5135:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4991:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4903:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4815:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3149:: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August 1112:

There are many suggestions for dealing with editing disputes at

1098: 594: 331: 230: 5213:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

5181:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

5125:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

5093:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

5059:

Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.

4981:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

4893:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

4805:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

4690:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

4617:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

4544:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

4479:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2653: 4950:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

4862:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

3031:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

2093:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 1927:, as you participated in the previous AFD for Quinton Hoover. 1677:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 654:

Hello Prosfilaes, I noticed that you removed the image on the

3733:

Basically, you cut off the article's nose to spite your face.

1622:. This is not censorship or POV pushing, it's common sense. ( 307:, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the 5253: 3423: 2979: 2884:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2862: 2664: 2578:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2560: 2441:

Issues about the article belong on article talk, not here.--

2132: 1801: 1539:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1517: 1006: 914: 841: 208:, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. 157: 3047:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary 2582:

If you choose to respond, please do so over there or here.

199:

without deleting the original replaceable fair use template

4249:

Since other contributors to the article are insisting for

4205:

Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)

4284:

File:Andre Lambert Footjob 1917.jpg listed for discussion

3163:

Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard

2169:. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek 1946:

Hi, you may be interested in the Lovecraft discussion at

1456:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of former Jews

1337:

I have removed the section 2009 section per consensus in

1138:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

4774:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

4019:

Your edit summary is a personal attack and uncalled for.

3420:

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

2729: 1373:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment

1158:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

607:

during its early years use its name at that time, e.g.,

5194: