User talk:Quadell/Archive 37

875:

itself, and (perhaps) the copyright held by the toy manufacturer. If you were to create a new photograph of the toy and license that photo under a free license, we would still have to claim "fair use" on the representation of the toy, but not on the photograph itself (which would be free). With the current photo, we unnecessarily have to use a non-free photo (rather than a free one) to represent a non-free underlying product. It has generally held on Knowledge (XXG) that we have to use free photos to represent these, even if an additional fair use claim has to be made on the representation of the underlying subject. (This hasn't been without controversy, but it's the way the community has pretty consistently interpreted

2897:

that the premise for including it, that it was the first porn movie released on bluray, may be inaccurate. I read in a few places that the first porn bluray movies were released in Japan.) Anyway, if you remove the block and someone puts the pic back in, I will not revert it. (I think that kind of counts as a consensus: I gave up) So, again, if you want to remove the block, I think it would be ok. Just a comment: I don't understand why no one cares about 12 year old kids accidently stumbling across that pic. I know that Knowledge (XXG) is not censored, but I think there should be

303:

of the overall new work, and (b) the logo's reproduction is an unintentional, circumstantial effect of the image (which was designed to portray the group, not Nike). What I've just described is the classic de minimis example. You can see how the same elements are in the dockwin image: the BBC logo is an circumstantial element of the image, which is designed to show the software. And the BBC logo is a small portion of the overall work. I hope this helps, –

31: 1215: 2343:

automatic fuction, BUT each page needs to be reviewed in detail before any automatic edit is saved. I have already posted problems related to the bot on its talk page such as adding the article name multiple times in a single FUR while ignoring the additional FUR's on that same page. Creating a duplicate FUR simply because the previous one was of a different format both being unacceptable edits.

1347:. The source of the image file and the web link authorizing use of the image elsewhere was also provided. In my understanding it is usable in Knowledge (XXG) within its policy standards. Such a speedy deletion was unwarranted and disheartening. Notably I am registered with the European Commission for downloading and using this image. -Faizul Latif Chowdhury, Brussels, 16 December 2007. 2653: 2074: 2744: 2414:

Is it really even practical to add blanket, automated rationales to images? If this made sense from a legality standpoint, wouldn't it be more practical to select from a FUR list when uploading, similar to the licensing list? Adding blanket FURs to images without a knowledge of each image and its use

2286:

Hi, I'm back. No, I didn't think to get bot approval for this task, and I should have. When I open an official bot request, hopefully tomorrow, I suppose all these concerns will come up there. To try to keep discussion in one place I'll lay out my reasoning there instead of responding to each concern

1541:

Thanks for the reply. I am still trying to get a handle on just how important the actual source of the image is. If a similar source and/or ovious link to the copywrite holder is all that is needed, then I will stop being so picky about the actual source. May I you your above statement as a general

1134:

I actually struggled to come up with a better heading. The problem is, that's the only thing Stoller's known for: making specious claims of trademark infringement. The "Vexation litigation" phrase is not subjective; that was a finding by the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

672:

Fair use of copyrighted material includes the use of protected materials for non-commercial educational purposes, such as teaching, scholarship, research, criticism, commentary, and news reporting. Unless otherwise noted, users who wish to download or print text and image files from this Web site for

2901:

kind of guideline for putting explicit content in pages that are not about subjects that may relate to explicit content. I know that may sound weird, but I know that Knowledge (XXG) already gets a lot of flack for letting anyone off the street edit it, and I don't thnk having that kind of content in

2787:

keeps putting back. Myself and at least two other people agree that this potentially scandalous image has no place in an article about an optical disc format and could potentially turn away casual users of Knowledge (XXG). I realize that Knowledge (XXG) is not censored, but I strongly feel that this

2540:

added rationales to logos, book covers, and album covers. It only added rationales where there was a single article the image was used in, and the bot had reason to believe that article was an article on the book, album, or organization represented by the image. There are a few stray cases where the

1803:

I frequently move images to Commons when they could conceivably be useful but aren't used here. Images that are the same on Commons can be speedily deleted here by any admin, so I don't see anything wrong with that. I wasn't using that move to justify closing it, as you put it -- I have no reason to

824:

Everyone? That is you and somebody else. I do not consider the discussion closed because you and the "everyone" did not adress my arguments. I will not upload the same image again in order not to get it deleted automatically again, but replace it with another image that adresses the reference in the

676:

1. The content may only be used for personal, educational, or noncommercial purposes; 2. Users must cite the author and source of the content as they would material from any printed work; 3. The citation must include all copyright information and other information associated with the content and

2524:

OK, that does make sense. I guess it would have to be a limited list of things it can add F-URs to. Radio/TV Logos, Movie logos, stuff like that. Historic images and images that require human input would be out.....but images that you can just slap an F-UR on (like a radio or TV logo) would be a

1804:

want to close it. There's no ulterior motive here. Would you like me to reopen the discussion on an image that no longer exists here? Would you like me to undelete it here, even though it exists on Commons, so that some other admin can speedily delete it? I'm not sure what you're asking for here. –

1467:

encyclopedia.) Because of this, we will only host images that uploaders submit if they are willing to license that images under a free license (which allows third parties to reproduce and modify the images, even for profit, without asking for permission first). If you decide that you are willing to

1188:

for nominating me, those who updated the RfA tally, and everyone for their support and many kind words. I will do my best to use the new tools carefully and responsibly (and since you are reading this, I haven't yet deleted your talk page by accident!). Please let me know if there is anything I can

783:

and consider it a violation of you admin powers. Without any warning you deleted the image, while the discussion was not closed. As I explained several times the image was relevant and there is a reference in the article to the image, in combination with the other images. By removing the image this

302:

The BBC logo is not a significant portion of the image, and is not and intentional portion of the image. Similarly, if you took a photo of a group of people, and one was wearing a Nike t-shirt with the swoop clearly visible, this would be de minimis because (a) the logo is not a significant portion

312:

It feels to me that the BBC logo etc. are being intentionally used in the image, having the effect of showing the type of content the application is designed to display, and its manner of displaying it. The very effect of the design of the software is to draw the eye to the feed-dependent content

170:

5 of his uploads for deletion, where I have been able to find copies on the web. However, I think that all of his images are probably copyvios, and he has uploaded them claiming PD-Self. The exif tags show that many different cameras were used, and the quality of the images vary from mediocre to

2896:

Hey Quadell, I just wanted to say thanks for your help in the whole Blu-ray edit war. I also want to apologize for starting an edit war in that article. I wasn't trying to do so, but I very strongly feel that that image is not relevant to the article and should be removed. (also, I just found out

2675:

please reply there: Your claim that " Each non-free image which is truly useful in the article needs to be mentioned in the text (not just the image's caption)" is new to me. I understand that just giving a title and artist name in a caption does not amount to discussion, but see no reason why a

2430:

It is not adding rationales. It is attempting to fix older rationales that were written before the article parameter was introduced (though the rationales still required an article to be named), or recent ones where people have (incorrectly) assumed that the automatically generated link is enough

2342:

Maybe not the best place for this, but due to the complex nature of fair use rationale and the multiple ways they have been done, it is impossible to create a bot that will run unattended without making for too many mistakes. The way the bot has been working, it looks like a great tool for a semi

727:

Thanks very much for the heads up - I could swear I read that somewhere once (that admins could check if articles were unwatched or not). It seems like a useful tool to have, but not one for everyone (I'm sure vandals would love to know what no one is watching). Perhaps I can suggest it... In any

874:

be deemed a derivative work (depending on the judge), and could be subject to the toy's copyright. But it would also create a new copyright -- that of the photograph itself. In the existing photograph, there are two copyrights to consider: the copyright held by the photographer on the photograph

2505:

FURs can be form letters, many can't be. For example, all the "historic images" need individual "purpose" bits added. Sometimes the surrounding data (article name, copyright holder, and some other things) can be added by automated methods, and some purposes are the same across a wide variety of

2489:

It bothers me that if Polbot even was adding rationales to a page, that you all would think it was wrong. Why would it be wrong? After vandalism, images that don't have an F-UR account for more warnings issued. If there was a bot that actually put F-URs on images, this would eliminate a big

1435:

Hi There, First of all this is not a complaint! I just uploaded the above mentioned file, which is a film poster. I really struggle figuring out how to upload a file without it being deleted straight away. There is no awailable option to choose when uploading a file like ours that reflects the

1564:

sort of link, so I usually link to the website. It's the same with CD covers: it doesn't matter whether we get the CD cover image from Amazon, MySpace, or a personal scan -- either way, the copyright-holder is the label. But, again, someone else might delete a CD cover with no explicit source

1436:

licence we hold. Its our poster. We hold the licence. But because it is promotional material we do support the distribution on the internet. And in this case we really want to have the official poster next to the article about the film. So I'm a bit confused what to do...any ideas? Thanks

1948:

Unless the policies have changed recently, simply being trademarked doesn't require a rationale. I notice someone has moved the image in question to Commons, which further indicates to me that trademark protection isn't sufficient to trigger non-freeness in the Knowledge (XXG) sense.

2415:

is not only a bad idea, but also opens a can of worms of many images being uploaded with these blanket FURs put on them, when they may very well be far from valid. Don't get me wrong, Quadell - I applaud your effort with your bot, but in this instance it may be ill-advised.

1307:

On another note, it might just be me, but is the title of the article somewhat misleading? At first look, I thought it was a biographical article, but upon reading it it's clear that it's an article about an event, not a person. The name also places undue emphasis on Davis.

2310:

Ditto. I don't know about running an unmonitored bot for adding whole rationales, but the article name additions were a great idea. Thanks for showing initiative in actually helping retain useful images. I doubt I'm the only one to find BC's above complaint kind of ironic.

1559:

Some people are more picky about sources than others. I tend to think that if it's a logo, and it's obvious what company is represented, then we know who owns the trademark. Any more sourcing is, in my opinion, icing on the cake. But some people think there should be

784:

make no sense anymore, while it is a relevant issue in relation to his arrest. I restored the image and would appreciate that you refrain from removing it again. You overstepped your athorities here and any further discussion should be handled by another admin. -

337:

Did you happen to read the talk page about the content or did you just delete? I forwarded the email from the artist himself who was also the author of the website in question with permission to use the content. I'll wait for you to undo what you did. Thank you.

1471:

One option you have is to upload a small, low-resolution version of the poster, and license only that small version under the GFDL. Other websites could copy that small image, but a larger, hi-resolution version would still be restricted. Would this work for

1517:

There is one problem that still remains, and that is the source of the image. The listed source does not seem to contain the exact image that was uploaded. It does have a flash version of the image. Any idea how to determine the true source of the image?

2043: 1168: 2386:

Does it make anyone else laugh that BetaCommand was the first to complain about Polbot? I would love to see where Polbot is "a huge mess and butchering rationales". Personally, I think Polbot is doing a great service, a service that will put the, as

1934:

It's probably not copyrighted, but it's certainly trademarked. Therefore it's still "non-free media" and, as I understand it, it still needs a non-free use rationale. The rationale doesn't say that it's copyrighted. I hope it's an improvement. :) –

2792:

an edit war starts (I'm still kind of new here), but I felt that it couldn't hurt to let someone know about it. I just removed the image from the page and I would like to request that Fairseeder be temporarily blocked if he keeps putting it back.

2490:

problem on Knowledge (XXG)....invalid F-URs or outright unrationaled images. You would think this would be something that would have already been done, but the fact that someone came up with this idea and it is getting slammed is kinda odd. -

2141:

Talking of rationales, your bot is adding them to image pages that already have rationales. Is it supposed to do that? Also would it be possible for the bot to remove invalid rationale notices placed by BetaCommandBot when adding a rationale?

2714:

You have to be an administrator to undelete the image. I am an administrator, but I've commented too much in this issue to close it as an "uninvolved admin". If you can find an uninvolved admin willing to close the case, that'd be great! –

352:

Greetings. Yes, I read the talk page, the article, and the page that the text was copied from. What do you mean by "I forwarded the e-mail"? Do you mean you forwarded it to me? I never got this e-mail. Do you mean you forwarded it to

2214:

I would also ask that you revert all the edits related to the unapproved task this bot has made (unless they have already been reverted). It's making a considerable mess and I would appreciate if your bot could rectify this mess.

677:

the URL for the Smithsonian Institution website; 4. None of the content may be altered or modified; 5. Users must comply with all other terms or restrictions which may be applicable to the individual file, image, or text."

803:, the discussion was closed, and everyone but you agreed that it should be deleted. Please do not reupload images that have been deleted according to the IFD process, as they can be speedily deleted by any admin according to 1046:

Thank you for the courtesy message. I think we've been through enough of these cycles/rituals of picture deletion so that I think everyone knows their part. If you think the pic is replaceable is fine with me. Thanks again.

2558:

Adding the article name multiple times in one rationale is not necessarily a bad thing. When the image has more than one FUR, or is used in more than one article, Polbot shouldn't be touching it. It should be putting it in

286:

Could you please explain how de minimis applies to this image? It seems to me that the use of BBC News' logo, logotype, headlines and abstracts are clearly legible and identifiable, and fulfil a major rôle in the image.

1717:

I'm positive that pic was deleted from the commons. Whoever did it said something along the lines of "copyvio. Obviously not Mcrazychick". Anyway it's back now - weird. The pic on en.wiki still needs deleting though --

1821:

removed it from the user's page and told her not to upload such images and/or to use userspace as a personal webpage, so she retired. Both images serve no purpose to wiki, both are, or should by now be orphaned. --

1672:

I'm not sure what you mean. It looks great now (except the "purpose" is worded badly, imho), so Polbot would ignore it entirely. Thanks! (Polbot's already getting thanks for the work, and she's only on the Cs.) –

2467:

It will also add the article name multiple times to the first FUR when a second FUR is also exists that does not have an article name as part of its entry (documented on Polbot's talk page). Another error in

595: 447: 963:

But in truth I had very little to do with it. The article was almost done when I got involved; I just tidied it up a bit. Still, I'm happy the next stage in the Solar Systme project is now in sight. :-)

1468:

license this poster under a free license, then we are quite willing to host it! But if you won't release it in this way, that's fine, that's your right -- but we won't be able to host it on our site.

919:

Hi Quadell. It looks like we both made a mistake on this image. The uploader originally puloaded his own image, and someone else came along and replaced it with a fair use image. Please undelete it.

2258:

justify the specific use of an image in the article that the image happens to be in (clearly a bad assumption for the image linked). I don't think this is a task a bot is smart enough to perform.

1630:

of the deletion, and removed the inlines of these images from the article. Here's hoping those working on that article can re-upload one or two of them, this time with the right Copyright info. —

614: 1845:

Well, you may be right. After several users voiced their opinion here, at the IFD, and on Commons, it's become clear to me that there's consensus to delete there as well. So I did. –

1623: 167: 2501:

There are many things that need to be done by humans, not bots. Bots can do some repair work, but writing explanations from scratch is not one of them, even if it is a form letter.

2879:

is really the pro for getting OTRS situations cleared up, and he's an admin on the Commons, so you might want to chat with him about it if you have questions. All the best, –

2354: 2320:

When I saw the bot running, I was glad to see someone was taking steps to fix easy problems like the article name backlinks. I'll contribute on the bot request page. — Carl

2541:

bot added a rationale that did not actually apply, but this was far less than 1% of the cases, and the rationale did always say something to the effect of "This rationale

2057:

For creating a bot (Polbot) that adds "correct" fair-use rationales to images and creating a bot that actually helps the user, I award you this barnstar. Good work! :) -

1777:

Uh, not quite, you yourself said "I have moved this to Commons...", so you moved it then used that to justify closing it here. I think you overstepped your bounds here.

1108: 2609: 2199:

I won't enter in the merit of the edits, but the bot is currently running a task for which it has never received approval. I have to ask you to stop. Happy editing,

2908:

I now that comment thing probably sounds weird, but I just really needed to put my concern out there... Anyway, thanks again for your help, I really appreciate it.

753:. I was pretty sure I had read about it somewhere, but I am not sure I would have ever found it on my own, so thanks to you and Elkman we both know about it now. 2814:

concerned that this is a non-free image used in an article where it's not relevant. I have nominated the image for deletion, and I'll keep an eye on the page. –

2676:

longer caption commenting on the work should not do so. Please clarify what you are saying, and produce policy references if you are indeed saying this. Thanks

708:

That may all be true, but Knowledge (XXG) declines to use images that are "non-commercial only", even though Knowledge (XXG) is a non-commercial enterprise. See

2732:

Could you undelete the local copy of this file? It is PD-US but not PD in Germany, and I want the local copy restored before commonsdelinker gets ahold of it. -

1300:

Thanks for requesting a glance-over for this article. While it shows some significant improvement, I believe that it has some statements which don't adhere to

1175: 2250:. The point of the rationale and the link to the article is not just to be Yet Another rule for the heck of it, but to ensure that the rationale given, well, 1362: 2254:

each specific use in each article. The effect of your bot, though, seems to be that it creates the sometimes erroneous claim that whichever rationale there

2126:

Thanks for adding a fair-use rationale for an image I missed. I didn't fully understand rationale templates when I started uploading them. Thanks again. :)

1088:

The image is for a $ 20,000 amp - thus unlikely to be available to just anyone to take a photo of. I have added even more fair use rational to the article.

1111:. As I don't know if you've gathered, somebody has been fighting for a change to the house style on how to notate multiple events on the same date. A 2549:

article. If this is not correct, please remove." So I see the "damage" (if you want to call it that) of adding an inapplicable rationale as minimal.

673:

such uses may do so without the Smithsonian Institution’s or FONZ's express permission, provided that they comply with the following conditions:

934:

Ack! I was hoodwinked! I restored the PD version of the image, along with the image description that related to it. Thanks for finding that. –

1304:. The most obvious ones include "curiously" and "it should be noted". Small statements like that reflect a media bias, and should be removed. 2525:

good place for this bot. I bet there are other areas where this bot would do some good work too...but now I understand what you all mean. -

1627: 1490:

Thanks for the input. I tried reasoning with the uploader on other issues, & he just won't go through OTRS to get "proof" of the claims!

1689: 1969:

I don't think we're treating logos consistently. I may be incorrect on what's the latest agreement. We need a good policy on the matter. –

1836: 1732: 2296:

I hope you get approval. It will be a welcome balance to all the fairly used images being deleted due to Betacommandbot's rampages. --

1017: 895: 2287:

here. (For now I'll just say I think Betacommand's characterization of Polbot's activity is incorrect.) 'Til tomorrow, all the best, –

1112: 1317: 510: 1528:

It could have been made by taking a screenshot. It's not all that important, though, since the source is obviously Pure Potential. –

1381:, which explains what can and cannot be used in detail. Don't be disheartened! Any image released under a free license (such as the 1358: 1141:

I'll remove his entry (which I believe was placed by Stoller himself) unless anyone can come up with a better categorization. --

175:

with this guy about it, but have received no response. He also seems to be agressively pushing these photos into articles, e.g.

2131: 1251: 1135:

He made his living, such as it was, by making false claims of trademark infringement, and accepting settlements as a nuisance.

539: 534: 473: 468: 543: 477: 245:. I left him a "final warning" on his talk page in case he returns and does this again. I'm going to list all his uploads on 2871:

Actually, I did delete the image. . . but I deleted it at Knowledge (XXG) (here), and the image also exists at the Commons (

1189:

do to be of assistance, and keep an eye out for a little green fish with a mop on the road to an even better encyclopedia.

2545:

covers use in the article on this book/album/organization. Any other use requires a different, separate rational(whatever)

185: 1228:

Could you please undelete the following images? We got an OTRS GFDL license for all images from Bloggingheads.tv (details

855:

My understanding is that a picture of a toy would be a derived work, and thus copyright of the original copyright holder.

171:

somewhat professional. This all suggests to me that the images were found on the web somewhere, but I can't prove it. I

161: 2696: 1893:. It's a very nice rationale, but I do note the image is not actually tagged as being fair use; rather, it is tagged as 1241: 1066:

It is my pleasure. I have taken many photos such as that one - I intend to add pics wherever possible when I have time.

663: 526: 460: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 113: 103: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 808: 2697:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_November_30#Image:Mart-Sander-and-Swing-Swind.jpg

2560: 2150: 1615: 1441: 709: 697: 1082: 237:

As you suspect, they're almost certainly all copyvios. An important thing to note, though, is that he hasn't edited

2872: 2127: 1619: 1337: 1294: 924: 780: 38: 2875:) Images at the Commons also show up here. Have you received OTRS confirmation yet? (Sometimes it takes a while.) 1514: 846: 215: 2431:(it's not). As far as I can tell, Polbot has never tried to write a rationale from scratch. That would be silly. 1354: 728:

case, I am a bit embarrassed - do you think I should strike that in my statement or just leave it? Thanks again,

1830: 1726: 423: 203: 2726: 1232:, Riana confirmed the license). When they're undeleted, I'll correctly tag them and move them out to Commons. 280: 1052: 1021: 638:

I think I see what you've done, you just did the whole page and removed the transclusion from the main page.

2837: 2826: 2510:

process human-generated lists and dump the human writing in the right place, but they can't do the writing.

1437: 1282: 1261: 971: 1350: 685: 191: 2143: 1897: 1890: 1875: 1654: 1408: 1071: 830: 789: 750: 504: 209: 2876: 2672: 2190: 1993: 1565:(erroneously, in my opinion), so just to be safe I usually link to an online source. Hope this helps, – 1405: 1279: 1258: 1246: 1048: 920: 639: 620: 267: 227: 2247: 1604: 500: 331: 197: 2568: 2515: 2450: 2436: 2362: 2175: 2024: 2005: 1871: 1662: 1640: 903: 581: 431: 1459:

of Knowledge (XXG)'s content and reproduce it elsewhere. (This is part of our mission to be a truly

2373: 2112: 1997: 1917:" approach, I'm not sure if you intended your bot to perform that sort of edit. Also, BTW, it used 1823: 1719: 1236: 1197: 988: 758: 733: 318: 292: 1914: 1420:

Boy, that's chewy. I commented there. I'll close it in a week if there's no further discussion. –

2757: 2733: 2704: 2546: 2263: 2229:

I've blocked the bot. Feel free to unblock as soon as the problem is resolved ;-) Happy editing,

1907: 1497: 1411: 966: 426:). You sucessfully spurred me into carrying out a long overdue rewrite, cheers! ;-) Best wishes, 2000:. It was started by Marmelad and I finnished it off. But Anyway, once agian thanks :) cheers. 2788:

picture has no place in that article. I don't know if it is standard policy to notify an admin

1813:

Oh, look what I started :-/ For what it's worth, I think the image needs deleting from en.wiki

2681: 2640: 2526: 2491: 2401: 2312: 2246:

I was just coming here to say that I noticed the bot making a clearly incorrect rationale for

2087: 2058: 1373:

I'm afraid that Knowledge (XXG) chooses not to accept non-commercial-only images. Our policy,

1313: 1075: 1067: 1016:

The Work Permit page exists, and there was a lot of useful material on the talk page. Thanks,

913: 826: 785: 172: 158: 47: 17: 2445:

Actually, I see it is trying to fill in templated rationales from scratch. That should stop.

1301: 2913: 2906:

relation to an explicit subject is going to help Knowledge (XXG)'s image in the wider world.

2864: 2848: 2800: 2420: 1953: 1925: 1818: 1791: 1756: 1693: 1386: 1093: 860: 530: 464: 379: 343: 263: 223: 1736: 1702:

Thanks for notifying me. I don't think a "no stubs" policy has much of a chance, though. –

1614:

Thankyou for sorting out the situation with those images expediently :-) I've notified the

1378: 1374: 876: 804: 800: 591: 246: 2784: 2564: 2511: 2446: 2432: 2358: 2171: 2020: 2001: 1658: 1631: 899: 693: 617:. If you are working from that list, would you mind marking them as fixed (via <s: --> 427: 2856:

I apologize. I saw the wrong date timestamp and thought you deleted my image. Sorry! --

2301: 2220: 2189:

your bot is making a huge mess and butchering rationales, its adding wrong rationales.

2108: 1214: 1193: 1146: 1120: 984: 807:. If you feel my deletion was against process, the proper channel is to bring it up at 754: 729: 1768:

Because it doesn't exist on the English Knowledge (XXG). It only exists on Commons. –

2700: 2327: 2259: 1989: 1491: 613:

I'm not sure where you are working from, put you've fixed several of the problems at

1167: 238: 2917: 2883: 2880: 2866: 2850: 2833: 2818: 2815: 2804: 2780: 2760: 2751: 2748: 2736: 2719: 2716: 2708: 2685: 2677: 2660: 2657: 2644: 2636: 2626: 2616: 2613: 2602: 2595: 2581: 2578: 2572: 2531: 2519: 2496: 2472: 2454: 2440: 2424: 2406: 2378: 2366: 2347: 2332: 2315: 2305: 2291: 2288: 2281: 2274: 2266: 2239: 2232: 2224: 2209: 2202: 2193: 2179: 2159: 2135: 2116: 2092: 2081: 2078: 2063: 2028: 2009: 1973: 1970: 1956: 1939: 1936: 1928: 1879: 1849: 1846: 1840: 1808: 1805: 1798: 1772: 1769: 1763: 1706: 1703: 1696: 1677: 1674: 1666: 1644: 1590: 1569: 1566: 1546: 1532: 1529: 1522: 1503: 1479: 1476: 1445: 1424: 1421: 1414: 1393: 1390: 1366: 1330: 1327: 1320: 1284: 1273: 1270: 1263: 1207: 1185: 1181: 1150: 1124: 1097: 1056: 1035: 1032: 1025: 992: 977: 953: 938: 935: 928: 907: 883: 880: 864: 834: 815: 812: 793: 768: 743: 716: 713: 701: 651: 648: 642: 633: 630: 623: 602: 599: 584: 569: 566: 514: 435: 412: 393: 390: 383: 360: 357: 346: 322: 307: 304: 296: 271: 253: 250: 231: 153: 150:

Quadell, I noticed a user with many copyright violations in their uploaded images,

680: 560: 494: 2506:

images. But many rationales need individual bits added. Bots can't do that. They

2170:

Well I didn't do a merger of the two explanations but I did expand the ending. --

1377:, states that such images should be deleted as soon as possible. Please note our 1138:

He's certainly not in the Internet or Software business as currently classified.

2909: 2857: 2841: 2796: 2416: 2042: 1950: 1922: 1780: 1745: 1229: 1089: 856: 629:

Oh yes. I always cross out the ones I've done (unless I forget and miss one). –

522: 456: 407: 375: 354: 339: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1455:, a free license, which means that any other third parties are allowed to copy 2469: 2344: 1587: 1543: 1519: 950: 689: 1343:

The image Guy Verhofstadt 2007.jpg was uploaded for insertion in the article

799:

It wasn't arbitrary, there was over a week of warning while it was listed at

2652: 2388: 2297: 2216: 2101: 2073: 1142: 1116: 580:

May I ask why you are deleting pages from the characters of Home and Away?.

2783:. The topic is a poster from a pornographic video released in Germany that 404:

A little strongly worded, but I'm very glad for the support. Much obliged.

2629:

looks good on you. See now though, I suck at the whole <div style/: -->

1410:. We respect Getty's copyfraud most of the time, why not this company's? - 2372:

Don't feel too bad about it, Quadell. We all make mistakes sometimes. :D

2323: 1513:

Thanks for taking the time to update the license and fair use statements

314: 288: 2391:

put it, "rampages" of BetaCommand Bot out of business, once and for all.

949:

Thank you for both your kind words and your lascivious speculation. :-)

2743: 1115:

is currently in progress - your contribution would be appreciated! --

1031:

Oops! You're right, I've restored it. Thanks for pointing that out. –

647:

Ah! Yeah, I probably forgot about striking off those. All the best, –

262:

Awesome, thanks for your help. Glad these are getting cleaned up. --

596:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Brad Armstrong (Home and Away)

448:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Brad Armstrong (Home and Away)

249:, and I suspect they'll all be deleted. Thanks for tracking this! – 1988:

Thanks for the kind words :), however I can't take all the credit.

1107:

Hello, I'm sending you this message since you were involved in the

2779:

I just wanted to let you know that an edit war may be brewing in

1690:

Knowledge (XXG):Village_pump_(proposals)#Too_many_redundant_stubs

2699:

Do you know how to reinstate the QE II image? Best regards, --

1452: 1382: 1311:

Hope that some of that helps. I'll cross post at the talk page.

1903:(since it is just a square with a line of text next to it) and 2840:, stating that I have permission to upload it as CC-3.0-BY. -- 2810:

Personally, I'm not worried about the explicit content. But I

2577:

The bot didn't change any images used in multiple articles. –

2019:

Thank you very much for the compliment, and have a great day!

25: 1278:

Thanks! I've Commons-ized them so you can re-delete them. :)

2355:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Polbot

811:, rather than simply reuploading the image. All the best, – 615:

2107:

Thanks for kind words, I've responded on the review page.

52:

This archive page covers comments 1801-1850, from roughly

1162: 1889:

I noticed Polbot recently added a fair-use rationale to

1451:

Yes, I can help. Knowledge (XXG) is licensed under the

1010: 556: 552: 548: 490: 486: 482: 405: 242: 176: 1011:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Work_permit

594:

for over 7 days, and the consensus was to delete. See

2836:, permission has been sent to the OTRS system about 1817:

the Commons. I'm not offended by such pictures, but

2610:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/Polbot 7

1742:

Why was the IFD discussion closed after a day only?

146:

User with many suspected copyvios. How to proceed?

241:in the last month, and hasn't uploaded any images 1921:in the edit summary which ended up as a redlink. 2353:FYI, to centralize, there's now a discussion at 779:I do not agree with your arbitrary deletion of 565:because of its listing on AfD, not its PROD. – 446:Hello, Quadell ... you deleted the articles in 2630:blah, blah, blah... But aren't you a computer 1389:licenses) can be used freely. All the best, – 1688:Hi Quadell. You might be interested in this: 8: 1586:Thanks again, and yes this does help a lot. 712:, linked from the top of this talk page. – 2612:. Let's take any new discussion there. – 2040: 983:and thanks for the kind words to me too! 2271:Should we rollback every FUR addition? 1103:Year page formatting of multiple events 186:Image:United Nations Headquarters .jpg 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2650:You bet your grant application I am! 1006:Hi, I think you accidentally deleted 879:in these instances.) All the best, – 7: 2777:Quadell, whichever you prefer ;-) ), 1657:- would Polbot swallow that OK now? 2608:Okay, I've opened a bot request at 2400:Ya just gotta laugh at that one. - 1431:TheBlackBalloon Official-Poster.jpg 896:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Miami 894:Thanks for your kind comment about 1404:We need a kind of final ruling on 178:. Can you advise how to proceed? 24: 1992:was creating a vector version of 2873:Commons:Image:Zac_Efron_2007.jpg 2742: 2651: 2561:User:Quadell/Report on backlinks 2072: 2041: 1252:Image:John Horgan Journalist.jpg 1213: 1166: 1109:August 2005 survey on year pages 710:User talk:Quadell/image deletion 499:has expired ... Happy Editing! — 29: 2858: 2842: 2527: 2492: 2402: 2151: 2088: 2059: 2034:Not a Square....Not a Circle... 1635: 1632: 1172: 1083:Image:RockfordFosgate_T15kW.jpg 809:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review 520:Yes, that's correct. I deleted 2781:Blu-ray Disc#Corporate Support 1338:Image:Guy Verhofstadt 2007.jpg 852:How is this image replacable? 781:Image:Salvatore_Lo_Piccolo.jpg 454:the AfD ... also, the PROD on 1: 2918:16:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2884:01:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2867:00:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2851:00:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2819:01:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2805:00:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2761:19:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2752:16:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2737:15:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2720:16:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2709:14:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2686:13:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2661:16:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2645:05:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2617:16:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2603:13:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2582:13:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2573:10:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2532:12:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2520:11:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2497:10:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2473:10:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2455:08:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2441:08:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2425:07:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2407:06:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2379:04:05, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2367:03:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2348:03:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2333:04:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2316:02:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2306:01:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2292:01:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2282:00:07, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2267:00:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 2240:23:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2225:23:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2210:23:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2194:23:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2180:19:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2160:19:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2144: 2136:18:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2117:17:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2093:19:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2082:19:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2064:16:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2029:15:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 2010:15:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 1974:13:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 1957:01:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 1940:13:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 1929:12:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 1880:22:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1850:03:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 1841:02:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 1809:01:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 1799:00:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 1773:00:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 1764:00:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 1737:22:03, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1707:18:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1697:17:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1678:16:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1667:16:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1645:03:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1591:03:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1570:03:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1547:03:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1533:02:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1523:02:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1515:Image:Pure Potential Logo.jpg 1509:Image:Pure Potential Logo.jpg 1504:20:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 1480:13:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 1446:12:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 1425:21:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 1415:02:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 1394:21:34, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 1367:21:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 1331:13:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 1321:05:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 1285:13:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 1274:13:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 1264:01:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 1242:Image:Francis Fukuyama BH.jpg 1208:21:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 1151:17:03, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 1125:15:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 1098:11:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 1076:16:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 1057:16:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 1036:13:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 1026:12:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 993:06:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 978:03:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 954:03:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 939:23:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 929:23:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 908:22:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 884:19:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 870:Yes and no. A photo of a toy 865:17:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 847:Image:Alphatrion-universe.jpg 835:12:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 816:12:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 794:12:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 769:13:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 744:04:51, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 717:04:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 702:04:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 664:Image:Cross_river_gorilla.jpg 652:22:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 643:22:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 634:22:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 624:21:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 603:15:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 585:15:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 570:14:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 515:14:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 436:01:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 413:03:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 394:22:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 384:22:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 361:05:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 347:04:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 323:00:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 308:00:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 297:00:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 272:21:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 254:19:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 232:19:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 216:Image:Mass Transit Reader.jpg 2374: 1212: 1192:Thanks again and take care, 1174:Thanks for your support, my 1165: 1156:Thanks for supporting my RFA 959:Thank you for the kind words 181:Example images (w/ camera): 2536:Just to be clear, this bot 389:Thanks! Glad to be here. – 2933: 1984:Allosaurus size comparison 1295:Robert Davis (New Orleans) 1178:passed 62/0/0 yesterday! 1160: 590:Sure. They were listed on 204:Image:Yankee Stadium11.jpg 2727:Image:SS-R.T.Heydrich.jpg 2047: 1326:Thanks for the review! – 749:Don't be chagrined about 422:thankyou from me too (re: 281:Image:Ide dockwin 000.gif 206:(Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL) 2838:Image:Zac Efron 2007.jpg 2827:Image:Zac Efron 2007.jpg 1915:wikt:belt and suspenders 1269:No problem, I got it. – 1061: 424:Duke of Lancaster (ship) 1891:Image:HR Block logo.png 1655:Image:AEL1964-Crest.svg 1379:non-free content policy 669:"Fair Use is Permitted 1994:Image:Alosizes(v2).png 1355:Faizul Latif Chowdhury 1247:Image:Joshua Cohen.jpg 751:Special:Unwatchedpages 192:Image:Hearst Tower.jpg 2695:Please revisit this: 2673:Talk:Western painting 2128:Man from the Ministry 2086:You're Welcome! :) - 2051:The Original Barnstar 1712: 1176:request for adminship 1081:Replaceable fair use 356:? Or what exactly? – 42:of past discussions. 1913:. While I like the " 1650:Double use of a logo 1237:Image:David Frum.jpg 1130:Vexatious litigation 210:Image:Municipal1.jpg 200:(Panasonic DMC-FZ30) 1870:You're welcome :)-- 1713:Mcrazychick's image 1486:Images (c) question 1400:Howard Frank Images 2877:User:Videmus Omnia 2769:Potential edit war 2634:?!? <grin/: --> 2248:Image:Abc_seal.gif 2149: 1605:Valérie Quennessen 1224:Undeletion request 1002:Erroneous Deletion 914:Image:PhilJoel.JPG 198:Image:MoMa NYC.jpg 2331: 2147: 2069: 2068: 1438:The Black Balloon 1369: 1353:comment added by 1345:Europe Book Prize 1221: 1220: 1204: 765: 740: 704: 688:comment added by 332:Glen S. Hopkinson 313:displayed in it. 64: 63: 58:December 21, 2007 54:December 10, 2007 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Quadell 2924: 2902:pages that have 2892:Blu-ray edit war 2862: 2846: 2773:Hey Quadell (or 2746: 2667:Question for you 2655: 2598: 2529: 2494: 2404: 2376: 2321: 2277: 2235: 2205: 2157: 2155: 2145: 2090: 2076: 2061: 2045: 2038: 2037: 1920: 1912: 1906: 1902: 1896: 1839: 1797: 1794: 1788: 1762: 1759: 1753: 1735: 1637: 1634: 1500: 1494: 1475:All the best, – 1387:Creative Commons 1348: 1217: 1202: 1180:I want to thank 1170: 1163: 1042:Robertwilson.gif 974: 969: 921:The Evil Spartan 763: 738: 683: 564: 546: 498: 480: 410: 165: 156: 59: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2932: 2931: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2894: 2830: 2785:User:Fairseeder 2771: 2730: 2693: 2669: 2624: 2596: 2592:Bot unblocked. 2275: 2233: 2203: 2187: 2168: 2156: 2153: 2124: 2105: 2036: 2017: 1986: 1918: 1910: 1904: 1900: 1894: 1887: 1885:Odd Polbot edit 1868: 1866:Metacomet Ridge 1829: 1824:Matthew Edwards 1792: 1781: 1778: 1757: 1746: 1743: 1725: 1720:Matthew Edwards 1715: 1692:Happy editing. 1686: 1652: 1609: 1511: 1498: 1492: 1488: 1433: 1402: 1385:or some of the 1341: 1316: 1298: 1226: 1201: 1173:<font=3: --> 1158: 1132: 1105: 1086: 1064: 1044: 1004: 972: 967: 961: 947: 917: 892: 850: 777: 762: 737: 725: 723:Re: Admin tools 678: 667: 611: 578: 537: 521: 471: 455: 444: 408: 402: 372: 335: 284: 243:in over a month 218:(Canon EOS 20D) 152: 151: 148: 143: 57: 53: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2930: 2928: 2907: 2893: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2829: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2794: 2778: 2770: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2729: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2692: 2689: 2668: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2623: 2620: 2606: 2605: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2522: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2370: 2369: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2318: 2308: 2269: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2212: 2186: 2183: 2167: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2152: 2123: 2120: 2104: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2067: 2066: 2054: 2053: 2048: 2046: 2035: 2032: 2016: 2013: 1985: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1943: 1942: 1886: 1883: 1867: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1714: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1685: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1651: 1648: 1608: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1536: 1535: 1510: 1507: 1487: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1473: 1469: 1432: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1401: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1340: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1312: 1297: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1255: 1254: 1249: 1244: 1239: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1211: 1198: 1171: 1157: 1154: 1131: 1128: 1104: 1101: 1085: 1079: 1063: 1062:You're Welcome 1060: 1043: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1014: 1013: 1003: 1000: 998: 996: 995: 960: 957: 946: 943: 942: 941: 916: 911: 891: 888: 887: 886: 849: 844: 842: 840: 839: 838: 837: 819: 818: 776: 773: 772: 771: 759: 734: 724: 721: 720: 719: 675: 666: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 610: 607: 606: 605: 577: 574: 573: 572: 443: 440: 439: 438: 401: 398: 397: 396: 374:Welcome back. 371: 368: 366: 364: 363: 334: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 283: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 257: 256: 220: 219: 213: 212:(KODAK CX7430) 207: 201: 195: 189: 147: 144: 142: 141: 136: 131: 126: 121: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 81: 76: 71: 65: 62: 61: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2929: 2920: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2905: 2900: 2891: 2885: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2865: 2863: 2861: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2849: 2847: 2845: 2839: 2835: 2828: 2825:Your edit to 2824: 2820: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2791: 2786: 2782: 2776: 2768: 2762: 2759: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2750: 2745: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2735: 2728: 2725: 2721: 2718: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2690: 2688: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2674: 2666: 2662: 2659: 2654: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2633: 2628: 2621: 2619: 2618: 2615: 2611: 2604: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2591: 2583: 2580: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2557: 2548: 2544: 2539: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2530: 2523: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2504: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2495: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2474: 2471: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2408: 2405: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2390: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2377: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2346: 2334: 2329: 2325: 2319: 2317: 2314: 2309: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2290: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2270: 2268: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2213: 2211: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2192: 2184: 2182: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2165: 2161: 2158: 2146: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2121: 2119: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2103: 2100: 2094: 2091: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2080: 2075: 2071: 2070: 2065: 2062: 2056: 2055: 2052: 2049: 2044: 2039: 2033: 2031: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2014: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1998:User:Dropzink 1995: 1991: 1990:User:Marmelad 1983: 1975: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1958: 1955: 1952: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1941: 1938: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1927: 1924: 1916: 1909: 1899: 1898:PD-ineligible 1892: 1884: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1865: 1851: 1848: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1835: 1832: 1828: 1825: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1807: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1795: 1789: 1787: 1785: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1760: 1754: 1752: 1750: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1731: 1728: 1724: 1721: 1708: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1695: 1691: 1683: 1679: 1676: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1649: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1612: 1606: 1603:Thankyou re: 1602: 1592: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1571: 1568: 1563: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1548: 1545: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1521: 1516: 1508: 1506: 1505: 1501: 1495: 1485: 1481: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1430: 1426: 1423: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1413: 1409: 1406: 1399: 1395: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1346: 1339: 1336: 1332: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1319: 1315: 1309: 1305: 1303: 1296: 1292: 1286: 1283: 1281: 1280:Videmus Omnia 1277: 1276: 1275: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1259:Videmus Omnia 1253: 1250: 1248: 1245: 1243: 1240: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1231: 1223: 1216: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1195: 1190: 1187: 1183: 1177: 1169: 1164: 1161: 1155: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1139: 1136: 1129: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1102: 1100: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1084: 1080: 1078: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1068:Paulba Legend 1059: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1041: 1037: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1018:67.168.65.207 1012: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1001: 999: 994: 990: 986: 982: 981: 980: 979: 976: 975: 970: 958: 956: 955: 952: 944: 940: 937: 933: 932: 931: 930: 926: 922: 915: 912: 910: 909: 905: 901: 897: 889: 885: 882: 878: 873: 869: 868: 867: 866: 862: 858: 853: 848: 845: 843: 836: 832: 828: 823: 822: 821: 820: 817: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 797: 796: 795: 791: 787: 782: 774: 770: 767: 766: 756: 752: 748: 747: 746: 745: 742: 741: 731: 722: 718: 715: 711: 707: 706: 705: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 682: 674: 670: 665: 661: 653: 650: 646: 645: 644: 641: 637: 636: 635: 632: 628: 627: 626: 625: 622: 616: 608: 604: 601: 597: 593: 589: 588: 587: 586: 583: 576:Home and Away 575: 571: 568: 562: 558: 554: 550: 545: 541: 536: 532: 528: 524: 519: 518: 517: 516: 512: 509: 506: 502: 496: 492: 488: 484: 479: 475: 470: 466: 462: 458: 453: 449: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 416: 415: 414: 411: 406: 399: 395: 392: 388: 387: 386: 385: 381: 377: 369: 367: 362: 359: 355: 351: 350: 349: 348: 345: 341: 333: 330: 324: 320: 316: 311: 310: 309: 306: 301: 300: 299: 298: 294: 290: 282: 279: 273: 269: 265: 261: 260: 259: 258: 255: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 235: 234: 233: 229: 225: 217: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 188:(SONY DSC-V3) 187: 184: 183: 182: 179: 177: 174: 173:tried to talk 169: 163: 160: 155: 145: 140: 137: 135: 132: 130: 127: 125: 122: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 66: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2903: 2898: 2895: 2860:Dan Leveille 2859: 2844:Dan Leveille 2843: 2831: 2811: 2789: 2774: 2772: 2731: 2694: 2670: 2631: 2625: 2607: 2594: 2593: 2542: 2537: 2528:NeutralHomer 2507: 2502: 2493:NeutralHomer 2468:programming. 2413: 2403:NeutralHomer 2371: 2341: 2273: 2272: 2255: 2252:rationalizes 2251: 2231: 2230: 2201: 2200: 2188: 2169: 2125: 2106: 2089:NeutralHomer 2060:NeutralHomer 2050: 2018: 1987: 1888: 1869: 1833: 1826: 1814: 1783: 1782: 1748: 1747: 1729: 1722: 1716: 1687: 1653: 1620:article talk 1613: 1610: 1561: 1512: 1489: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1434: 1403: 1344: 1342: 1310: 1306: 1299: 1256: 1227: 1196: 1191: 1179: 1159: 1140: 1137: 1133: 1106: 1087: 1065: 1045: 1015: 1005: 997: 965: 962: 948: 918: 893: 871: 854: 851: 841: 827:Mafia Expert 786:Mafia Expert 778: 757: 732: 726: 679: 671: 668: 662:Deletion of 612: 579: 507: 501:72.75.72.199 451: 450:but did not 445: 419: 403: 373: 370:Welcome back 365: 336: 285: 221: 180: 149: 108: 43: 37: 2691:Mart Sander 2547:$ inarticle 2166:Taqi al-Din 1694:Valentinian 1684:Post on WPP 1542:guideline? 1465:open source 1407:. See also 1349:—Preceding 684:—Preceding 640:John Reaves 621:John Reaves 618:</s: --> 523:Jazz Curtis 457:Jazz Curtis 264:ChrisRuvolo 224:ChrisRuvolo 194:(NIKON D80) 36:This is an 2565:Carcharoth 2512:Carcharoth 2447:Carcharoth 2433:Carcharoth 2359:Ricky81682 2172:BoogaLouie 2154:projectors 2077:Thanks! – 2021:J. Spencer 2015:Allosaurus 2002:Steveoc 86 1872:Pgagnon999 1659:Carcharoth 1113:discussion 900:NancyHeise 775:Lo Piccolo 428:Snowy 1973 344:Talk to me 222:Thanks. -- 166:. I have 109:Archive 37 2632:scientist 2622:Hi There! 2109:Jimfbleak 2102:Blackbird 1919:& 1908:Trademark 1611:Quadell, 1375:WP:CSD#I3 1200:<: --> 1194:Ruhrfisch 985:Jimfbleak 945:Thank you 805:WP:CSD#G4 761:<: --> 755:Ruhrfisch 736:<: --> 730:Ruhrfisch 681:See here. 400:Thank you 2795:Thanks, 2747:Done. – 2701:Ssilvers 2260:Dmcdevit 1837:Contribs 1733:Contribs 1616:uploader 1493:SkierRMH 1363:contribs 1351:unsigned 1257:Thanks! 825:text. - 698:contribs 686:unsigned 609:Copyvios 582:Screechy 511:contribs 442:Cleanups 2881:Quadell 2834:Quadell 2816:Quadell 2749:Quadell 2717:Quadell 2678:Johnbod 2658:Quadell 2637:DO11.10 2614:Quadell 2597:Snowolf 2579:Quadell 2289:Quadell 2276:Snowolf 2234:Snowolf 2204:Snowolf 2122:Thanks. 2079:Quadell 1971:Quadell 1937:Quadell 1847:Quadell 1806:Quadell 1770:Quadell 1704:Quadell 1675:Quadell 1633:digital 1567:Quadell 1530:Quadell 1477:Quadell 1422:Quadell 1391:Quadell 1328:Quadell 1302:WP:NPOV 1271:Quadell 1186:Dincher 1182:Snowolf 1033:Quadell 968:Serendi 936:Quadell 898:'s FA. 881:Quadell 813:Quadell 714:Quadell 649:Quadell 631:Quadell 619:there? 600:Quadell 567:Quadell 540:protect 535:history 474:protect 469:history 391:Quadell 358:Quadell 305:Quadell 251:Quadell 154:Jbloun1 39:archive 2910:Thingg 2797:Thingg 2790:before 2417:JPG-GR 1951:Anomie 1923:Anomie 1628:WP:PUI 1607:images 1090:Fosnez 951:Jayjg 890:Thanks 877:WP:NFC 857:Taemyr 801:WP:IFD 592:WP:AFD 544:delete 478:delete 418:And a 409:Durova 376:Wiggy! 340:Carter 247:WP:PUI 168:listed 2756:Ta! - 2470:Dbiel 2375:Maser 2357:. -- 2345:Dbiel 1819:Jimbo 1786:levse 1751:levse 1624:WP:CP 1588:Dbiel 1544:Dbiel 1520:Dbiel 1199:: --> 1049:Dr.K. 872:might 760:: --> 735:: --> 690:Mikco 561:views 553:watch 549:links 495:views 487:watch 483:links 452:Close 16:< 2914:talk 2899:some 2801:talk 2775:your 2758:Nard 2734:Nard 2705:talk 2682:talk 2641:talk 2569:talk 2543:only 2538:only 2516:talk 2503:Some 2451:talk 2437:talk 2421:talk 2389:TJRC 2363:talk 2328:talk 2302:talk 2298:TJRC 2256:does 2221:talk 2217:Nick 2185:Stop 2176:talk 2132:talk 2113:talk 2025:talk 2006:talk 1876:talk 1831:talk 1793:Talk 1758:Talk 1727:talk 1663:talk 1641:talk 1626:and 1562:some 1499:talk 1472:you? 1463:and 1461:free 1453:GFDL 1442:talk 1412:Nard 1383:GFDL 1359:talk 1314:Jame 1230:here 1184:and 1147:talk 1143:TJRC 1121:talk 1117:Smjg 1094:talk 1072:talk 1053:talk 1022:talk 989:talk 925:talk 904:talk 861:talk 831:talk 790:talk 694:talk 598:. – 557:logs 531:talk 527:edit 505:talk 491:logs 465:talk 461:edit 432:talk 380:talk 319:talk 293:talk 239:much 2832:Hi 2671:at 2508:can 2324:CBM 1996:by 1815:and 1636:eon 1457:all 1293:Re: 973:ous 420:big 315:EdC 289:EdC 56:to 2916:) 2904:no 2812:am 2803:) 2707:) 2684:) 2656:– 2643:) 2635:-- 2627:It 2571:) 2563:. 2518:) 2453:) 2439:) 2423:) 2365:) 2326:· 2313:╦╩ 2311:ˉˉ 2304:) 2223:) 2178:) 2134:) 2115:) 2027:) 2008:) 1911:}} 1905:{{ 1901:}} 1895:{{ 1878:) 1796:• 1790:• 1779:— 1761:• 1755:• 1744:— 1665:) 1643:@ 1639:• 1622:, 1618:, 1502:) 1444:) 1365:) 1361:• 1149:) 1123:) 1096:) 1074:) 1055:) 1024:) 991:) 927:) 906:) 863:) 833:) 792:) 700:) 696:• 559:| 555:| 551:| 547:| 542:| 538:| 533:| 529:| 513:) 493:| 489:| 485:| 481:| 476:| 472:| 467:| 463:| 434:) 382:) 342:| 321:) 295:) 270:) 230:) 139:50 134:42 129:41 124:40 119:39 114:38 104:36 99:35 94:34 89:33 84:32 79:30 74:20 69:10 2912:( 2799:( 2703:( 2680:( 2639:( 2567:( 2514:( 2449:( 2435:( 2419:( 2361:( 2330:) 2322:( 2300:( 2264:t 2262:· 2219:( 2191:β 2174:( 2148:│ 2130:( 2111:( 2023:( 2004:( 1954:⚔ 1926:⚔ 1874:( 1834:| 1827:| 1784:R 1749:R 1730:| 1723:| 1661:( 1496:( 1440:( 1357:( 1318:§ 1203:° 1145:( 1119:( 1092:( 1070:( 1051:( 1020:( 987:( 923:( 902:( 859:( 829:( 788:( 764:° 739:° 692:( 563:) 525:( 508:· 503:( 497:) 459:( 430:( 378:( 317:( 291:( 268:t 266:( 228:t 226:( 164:) 162:c 159:t 157:( 60:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index