User talk:Quadell/Archive 32

1348:) not allowed to use a non-free image if a free image could be created that could replace it (even if it would be very difficult to create such an image). The Wikimedia Foundation helpfully clarified: "That would include nearly all non-free portraits of notable living people." In the article on Mr. Gajdusek, any new photograph of him would illustrate the article adequately, so there's no need to use a non-free image. Because of this change, a significant fraction of non-free images on Knowledge (XXG)'s servers have had to be deleted. 31: 1115:

neck. Also the picture is a bit bleached giving the dog a rather insipid look. Possibly the dog in question is in fact a good one, but the picture is not. The picture should try and represent as good an example as possible, to give the public a better overall view and understanding about what the breed should represent. I think the one used already does this nicely. Perhaps you have another bitch photo you wish to put in there instead?

1937: 788:, not the "rio grande darter". Your script seems to be generating them in all-lowercase. I've fixed a few manually (e.g., the Rio Grande darter), both in the article itself, and in the title (where necessary), but it's hopeless to keep up with a bot. Could you tweak your script to not generate such articles in the first place? There's no point in blindly importing known-deficient data into Knowledge (XXG). Thanks, 809:

article, move it, fix up redirects, etc. -- especially if that latter task must be performed without bot assistance. So I was hoping that you could either do a quick pass through each batch of data yourself (not to catch all proper-name problems, just the most egregious ones), or post it to WP as a list/table (for a month, say), to allow other editors to clean it up, before you create the individual articles.

1106:

copyright requirements posted on Knowledge (XXG) are so dense that they are completely unintelligible - and I am a lawyer, used to deciphering unintelligible language. The self-appointed picture weeders would do everyone a favour by writing clear instructions, with a simple tick list which can be followed by those who want to contribute pictures. I am not about to waste more of my time.

1716: 1157:

continuing your work. I just want you to remember that when you have an criticism from users who clearly are so far gone they can't recognize the benefit of your work that I think you are doing a superb job and to never give up. I know there are many other editors who are extremely appreciative of your work. All the best and keep the articles coming!

1383:

That's because she was (temporarily) running two different tasks at once, both of which were approved at 6 edits per minute. (Consider: if I used two bot accounts instead of one for the two tasks, it wouldn't be a problem to run both at the same time at 6 edits per minute, so I reason that it isn't a

1118:

I am not getting embroiled in the AKC issue as it has no bearing on the Boerboel as yet, as 99% of Boerboel owners in America have decided not to register their dogs there. Knowledge (XXG) is not meant to be used as free advertising or promotion. If you wish to mention that there is some kind of very

489:

I wasn't aware of that. My bot uses the taxonomy at the IUCN redlist, and creates articles that seem to be missing. Inevitably, it creates some "duplicate articles", though I try to avoid these. If you can give me more information (what families, etc.) I can tag them as "merge" if the Polbot articles

245:

Most of what you do here concerns the deletion of pictures. Do you get a kick out of deleting pictures all day long? This is not the Britannica, you dork. Why must you be such a joykill, this is Knowledge (XXG). YOU DON'T WORK FOR WORLD BOOK. Plus, in the world of academia, Knowledge (XXG) is a joke;

2122:

Could you see the comment I made on my talk page and perhaps tweak the wording of PD-font? It's current wording is misleading. SVG versions of fonts are NOT INFRINGEMENTS... the only thing copyrightable in a vector font is the programming, and reproducing the programming in a different manner is not

1256:

The bird list at IUCN is complete, as is the amphibian list and certain groups of mammals (such as rodents and bats). Members of those Wikiprojects had asked (repeatedly, vociferously) that I make the pages for monotypic genera into redirects to the species pages. The plants are not at all complete,

1114:

Quadell I had to remove your picture of the Bitch, in my opinion the other picture is much nicer, not a personal issue, but the one you are using is not a very well put together Boerboel. The hind is far to weak, not enough second thigh or muscle in general going on there, same with the top line and

1105:

This was my first contribution to Knowledge (XXG), anxious as I am to improve its reliability and usefulness. I should have known better. I gave full details of where the picture came from, and I mentioned that I have the copyright owner's consent on file. That is as far as I can take it because the

1090:

When you uploaded this photo, you indicated that it is available under a non-commercial-use-only license. We can't use such images on Knowledge (XXG). If the copyright-holder is willing to allow anyone to use the image, even for commercial purposes, then we can use it. If so, I'll restore it. But if

1300:

was deleted. Now, of course, that leaves me with no idea what the image was; why it was considered "replaceable"; or on which articles it was used. Do you have access to any of these details, and/or can you tell me where I can gain access to them? I've contributed many images over the years, and am

1180:

You said that you would revert the mistakes considering several monotypic genera that were in the IUCN red list with only a species listed, but you didn't still make this. This error is considered serious, it is not as the one of the convention WP:PLANTS that doesn't have importance. Then as J.

1156:

Wow I'm amazed at the difficulty you've been facing!!!! I think the Bot is ingenius and if utilized correctly is of enormous benefit to the encyclopedia as it sets a foundation for other editors to try to expand. I really really!!! appreciate any work you do in this area and strongly support you in

812:

Arguably, however, this data would probably be better presented in tabular form in the first place. Statistically, the vast majority of the auto-extracted species are so obscure, that it's almost certain that their articles will never get edited, or probably even read. I think it would actually be

455:

I had an image of an infinity sign that I created that I want to be used here, I don't know why it was deleted, the rules and explanations are too complex, making them impossible to fathom. The system needs to be understandable if people are to make decisions on a license. I do want the image to be

2349:

Glad you are enjoying yourself. :) On a bit related topic, what do you think of NOGALLERY on the daily image deletion categories. It has been removed and added a few times from the template starters (currently nogallery is on). I prefer having the galleries when I work on those categories but that

798:

Unfortunately, there's no way for Polbot to know whether a word is a proper name, and should be capitalized, or is a regular word, and should be in lowercase. It's unfortunate, but there's no way around it -- these will have to be manually fixed. I do think, however, that having a nice stub with a

503:

The IUCN don't follow any particular taxonomy: they just use whatever names their contributers feel are appropriate at the time. So, using those names is likely going to get you into trouble. Similarly, using common names to create those articles instead is just as risky, since so many of them are

478:

Hi Quadell! I notice that you created a number of new viper articles last Sunday (29 July). However, very few of them seem to follow the taxonomy that's been applied to the main body of these articles. As a result, a number of them are attempts to describe snakes that we already have articles for.

1833:

for free content release of some of their publicity materials (which they have done before) but am getting inconsistent responses from them. I'm hoping to find the terms they have previously released materials under, and a point of contact from previous releases. Appreciate anything you can do to

759:

The images are definitely copyright violations. The uploader had previously uploaded other known copyright violations. But the user uploaded the images to the Commons, not to Knowledge (XXG), so there's really nothing we can do here (except remove the images from articles when we see them there.)

1351:

I don't doubt at all that your image uploads were all inline with policy at the time, but policy has gotten strict. By the way, I have personally written to the Nobel Foundation to ask if they could release their images under a free license, but they declined. If you know of a way to contact Mr.

218:

Hi, I see there was an issue about the Arthropods which caused your Polbot to stop running to this day. Until that category's kinks get worked out, can't Polbot work on the other categories (i.e. the fishes, plants, and the invertebrates) in the meantime? I liked how Polbot created articles so

808:

Right, the data source you use may have already smashed the case information irretrievably, and some human intelligence may be required to recover it. My point is, though, that fixing the data while it's still in list/table form takes just a fraction of the work needed to edit each individual

282:

No one is saying that Knowledge (XXG) should be cited as an academic reference. Nonetheless, it is a great place to go for generally-reliable information on a wide variety of subjects, and a useful starting-point for further research. I personally find it very helpful when completing

1405:

concerning a request for a {{Cincinnati-stub}} for our project that you may be interested in adding your vote or ideas at. Also, there are new tasks added to the Open tasks section of the project page that may be of interest. I look forward to working with you as the project grows!

1364:

Hello, regarding the photo of Dave Winfield at the Baseball Hall of Fame, I took it. I'm Mr. Winfield's personal assistant, and he wanted this photo on his Wiki page. I think I did the copyright tag correctly, but if not, please let me know how to do it. Thanks Hotcop2

1130:

I notice that Polbot does better on plant taxonomy than on animal taxa. In general the world of biology is very animal oriented, so it's nice to see something that is plant biased. You're really doing a great job adding useful species stubs to Knowledge (XXG), imo.

1762:

same reason they have been placing everywhere onto the article's talk. They failed to address all of the issues, but this is no longer clear 3RR vandalism. Do we bring this to ANI or simply perform another WP:AN3 case, even if we can't revert him again currently?

894:

I strongly suspect that all the photos he says he took himself are legit. I don't see any evidence he has been deceptive or tried to cover anything up -- he just doesn't understand the concept of derivative works. So I don't see any need to tag the photos of

2073:

You said you had to re-code Polbot to auto-generate plants. How far along are you and how soon will the recoding finish? I can't wait to see her start up again! :-) Besides, we're passed halfway through the month and we still have <46,000 articles to go.

1079:

Did you remove my insertion of a picture in the article Shtreimel? If you did, kindly put it back. I gave complete details of the origin of the picture, and I gave chapter and verse of the copyright holder and the permission I have from him to insert the

859:

You seem to have a much better handle on Knowledge (XXG)'s Image policies and guidelines than I do. But even I know that scanning or taking a picture of a copyrighted work doesn't transfer the copyright to the person doing the scanning or picture taking.

1648:

One man's "outlandish conspiracy-theory" is another man's "reasonable interpretation". Please don't insult someone else's POV. On the other hand, the article shouldn't go beyond sourcing, and should not leave out other sourced POVs. I'll look it over. –

2293: 736:

page (since removed). The pics claim PD, but they look like company promotional pics, which are generally copyrighted. I don't know the exact tags opr proceedures to question thes pics, and I was wondering if you could check them out for me. Thanks. -

1447:

I am a student studying at Wodonga TAFE and I gained permission from the department that runs the station to place the logo online. I had used the right licensing descriptors in uploading the picture and someone seemed to have removed it.

2063:

This is the same guy as above, and who was --170.133. I just got back home earlier tonight. How is Polbot doing and why has he stopped? There hasn't been another block on him, so when will he resume? I hope to see him work again soon. :)

338:

Thanks, ProveIt! Yeah, I would be all for categorizing based on scientific name only. . . but there are many others who would disagree (and some or experts in their field), so I don't know if that's possible. Keep up the good work! –

613:, etc, etc, etc, are ALL NON monotypic genera. I think that is better to set the Polbot to revert all those edits (considering those monotypics) and after that, we'll check each genus manually to see wether they are monotypic or not. 1601:

Polbot creates genus categories, but not family categories. Some users had talked with me before about this, and they decided it would be best to let humans make the family articles (since they may already exist at other names). –

321:

this morning, and as I expected it's not meshing exactly easily, but I think in the long run it's a good thing, these are issues we would have come up and have to be resolved sooner or later. See for example the discussion about

813:

more useful to generate, say, one article per genus, with sections for the individual species; then the particularly interesting ones can get their own articles if and when there's something substantial to say about them.

1188:

I believe that in general Polbot has been making a great contribution, mainly for bringing to Knowledge (XXG) this list of IUCN, helping in the urgent preservation of the species that are in serious extinction danger.

1192:

But unhappily the mistake was yours (Quadell) that concluded that when there would be only one species listed, the genus it would be monotypic, what is not true, there are certain genus with more than 100 species, like

229:

Thanks! Yes, I can run her for plants and other biota. Right now, I'm getting her to fix monotypic genera, but I should have her creating articles again soon. (It's been busy in Quadell-land lately.) All the best, –

868:

and give him some guidance. I imagine most, if not all, of the outdoor monument-type ones are probably OK, but I suspect most, if not all, of the passports are copyrighted by their respective governments. Thanks.

704: 696: 1486:

We may kill you along the way with the work we require you to do to deal with this, but we're going to make a taxonomist out of you yet. Just wait until we get to higher level taxa, or algae taxonomies.

372:

Blocked for 31 hours. Not sure how effective that will be, since he/she didn't make any contributions for 2 weeks previous to uploading and reinserting this copyvio. Thanks for keeping an eye on this. –

2326:

I just cleaned my watchlist and saw that almost all the images I tagged as replaceable were deleted by you. Made me feel quilty that I do the easy work (tagging), and you the harder work. (deleting) :)

202:. After his block, I'll try to explain more in-depth to Frikkers about what constitutes a consensus-building discussion. Sadly, I think the language barrier is part of what is worsening this problem. 539:

Greetings. The genera Biscutella and Wedelia only have one species (each) listed at IUCN, and only have one species (each) with articles on Knowledge (XXG). What other species are in these genera? –

1850:- she made the Guinness Book of World Records as "the most downloaded woman on the Internet", but we curiously did not have a picture of her. Now people can download her from Knowledge (XXG). :-) 1402: 456:

used. I hope that is clear. I also do not want to have to keep coming back and having it 'explained' as it still wont make perfect sense, it takes up time, and I want the image to be used.

1418: 898:

As for the passports, a year or two ago there was a big discussion about whether passport were copyrightable "creative content" or not. I don't remember what came of it though. I'll bet

323: 784:

Hi. You seem to be autogenerating a bunch of articles from the IUCN Red List. However, a number of the common names of the various species are properly written capitalized, e.g., the

2096:

now claims to be the copyright holder. This after you and others queried the previous claims of fair use. I'm always concerned about his/her contributions given the history shown on

1913:

Go ahead and delete it whenever you happen to be on Commons - I haven't heard back from her, but I can always re-upload the image if she has (another) change of heart later. Thanks!

1301:

not entirely sure which one this is... though it seems unlikely that I would have uploaded an image that wasn't in-line with the criteria (at least the criteria at the time). -

402::-) Yes, there's no copyright probem. Only "creative content" can be copyrighted, such as sentences. Data isn't subject to copyright. (There was a debate about this earlier on 1623:. The other user insists on putting an outlandish conspiracy theory (for which he has a footnote, of course) about Greer shooting Kennedy into the article. Can he be stopped? 1785: 552:

Yes, they only have one species (each) listed at IUCN, but there are much more species described (see refs), and articles in Knowledge (XXG) are not only on IUCN red list.

177:

Thanks a ton for the quick response. I wasn't completely certain, since I seemingly learn some new wrinkle about fair use every day, but I thought so. No harm done! --

879:

Gah - I started tagging 'em - there's tons of them! I'm going to hold off on the rest for now and watch this page - Quadell, if you think the rest should be tagged for

419:

Fair 'nuf. Just wanted to double check. I catch a wide net when I patrol new page, and I wanted to make sure you were small fry before I got you off the hook. —

565:. If a family contains only one genus, the article should still be at the genus name, as that is more likely to be commonly recognised." Please correct all those. 2131:

and IBM v Phoenix on the net generally for the legality of clean room reverse engineering, that is producing identical results using different programming code. -

2170: 799:

well-formed taxobox, conservation information, and reference, but with a capitalization error, is much better than not having the article in the first place. –

970: 973:), we need a place to keep track of his opinions, so he will be less inundated with inquiries and so we can use them as precedent. I'm thinking a subpage of 2351: 1213:

I've actually been working on the problem today. It's only been a few days since the problem was brought to my attention -- please have a little patience. –

2035:

I want to repost the NCPD image that got taken down earlier. It's a publicity photo they put out with the intent it should be published. What should I do?

1200:

I could make the correction, but I don't find correct to put a robot to make mistakes and to push POVs and later a human to correct everything manually!

834:. I rather doubt anyone would type this in. Particularly with the singular quotations. Or am I incorrect? I'm no expert on plants so I'm not sure. :) - 1578:

It looks like Polbot forgot to create this category somehow, but I'm not sure what its parent category should be. Would you mind taking a look at it?

920: 1017:

Be sure to inform him about this page. He might object to any paraphrase of his opinions. I don't know, but it's polite to notify him either way. –

589:

As for the second problem, that's interesting. Animals recommend having the article at the species. I can correct those for plants. All the best, –

1045: 992: 1065:

Good job. Thanks. I'm going to edit the pages where I've moved taxa already from common names to scientific names, if there are just a few.

1384:

problem to run both tasks from the same account.) She's done with one of the tasks, so she shouldn't run at more than 6 now. All the best, –

1322: 844:

I've been wondering that myself. I don't even know what that means. It should probably be moved to a better name, but I have no idea what. –

1327:

We have no replacement image there, and certainly there's no free image of him at the ceremony that I'm aware of, so why was this deleted? -

2308: 2002: 1815:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 158:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 2152:. Curious that two different people have brought this up regarding two different images in a single day. Can you please look at this? - 831: 2146: 1672: 2272:

Good block, beat me to it by a minute. Thanks for that, going through these conflicts with Polbot is going to take a few minutes.

700: 688: 1422: 1005: 194:

I just wanted to let you know that, after his fourth revert on the first of August, Frikkers has been blocked for 31 hours by

1741: 1702: 1441:

I am the last person to edit the Wodonga TAFE Radio article and I thought I would contribute some discussions regarding it.

1223: 611:

Blepharispermum, Brachylaena, Cheirolophus, Chevreulia, Chuquiraga, Critonia, Crossothamnus, Cuatrecasanthus, Cylindrocline

1887: 638:

Hm, yeah, that's disappointing. I'll revert all Polbot's edits that changed (supposedly monotypic) plant genera to rds. –

504:

ambiguous. I've already corrected the problems, but I'd rather you didn't use Polbot to create any more viper articles. --

2340:

Wow, thanks! My pleasure, really. I don't have cable, so this is what I do for mildly-entertaining, mindless fun. :-) –

1639: 582:

As for the first problem, Polbot doesn't have any way of knowing whether a genus is truly monotypic, or whether it just

155: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 113: 108: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 1808: 151: 1559: 1141:

Thanks so much! I need to finish up some things with animals, but I'll probably start back on the plants next week. –

406:

and the consensus agreed with me on this.) Thank for noticing, though. But no more puns for you -- you're grounded. –

561:

Furthermore, from WP:PLANTS: "Where a genus is monospecific (has only a single species), the article should be named

38: 1444:

You were the last person to remove entries to the Logo that was placed on wikipedia so it was best to choose you.

2149:, even though Howcheng ruled the image was pd-ineligible when he closed the ifd. Maybe we need a new tag, such as 1119:

minimally used development register for the breed at the AKC, you can do so under the AKC Knowledge (XXG) entry.

2202: 2039:

I don't know what NCPD stands for, but we generally cannot use non-free publicity photos on Knowledge (XXG). –

1829:

Brother, you know anyone with OTRS access that might be able to help me out with an issue? Trying to work with

1312: 1158: 479:

Are you aware of this? (PS -- You can reply here as I've temporarily added your talk page to my watch list.) --

317: 1235:

Yes, actually how can you tell whether a genus is monotypic in IUCN, does it say it is? It certainly should

770:

Thanks for your help. I'll try to add some tags to the pic's commons pages to question their status there. -

2260: 2235: 2224: 2193: 1917: 1906: 1894: 1854: 1838: 1619:

Don't know if this is your beat or not, but I am having a back-and-forth with another user on the entry for

1566: 1474: 887: 364: 263: 1669:

please send your real-name, your wikiname, your prefered login-name and the public part of your ssh-key to

1627: 1395: 1545: 1540:

Hi. Robert Carlson has replied to you on my talk page, regarding the origins of the Riverboarding images.

2253: 2075: 2065: 1281:

Great work! Continue so in your great goal! Everything for the correct information. Thank you very much!

220: 2257: 2232: 2221: 2190: 2010: 1914: 1903: 1891: 1890:? The article subject has had a change of heart about usage of the image, and I'd like to respect that. 1851: 1835: 1812: 1563: 1471: 884: 361: 260: 1297: 2113: 2055: 1862: 750: 2054:

Hi, I'm sorry but why did Polbot stop again? I hope to see 2,000,000 before the end of this month. --

1589: 2089: 753: 747: 1039: 986: 2220:

Hmmm - the Commons license drop down only has the CC 3.0 Attribution license, not the ShareAlike.

2093: 1758:

So once again, Frikkers has violated the 3RR on this article. Except this time, they parroted the

1455: 350: 2358: 2331: 2315: 2153: 2142: 2132: 1735: 1696: 1257:

and I shouldn't have run that process on the plants. I'm still in the process of undoing that. –

1081: 1009: 708: 1902:

Actually, hold off a bit - I'm talking with the subject, who is worried about a COI perception.

1419:

Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_August_11#Category:Physicians_from_Cincinnati

1562:

is building a backlog. It's easy because you don't have to remove the images from articles. :)

2128: 2097: 1451:

I have re-uploaded it this time with Logo licensing in the hope that no-one removes it again.

1135: 1033: 980: 861: 835: 785: 733: 274: 47: 17: 2167:

Given your extensive Knowledge (XXG) experience, I'd appreciate your input on the following:

1345: 838: 403: 2210: 1635: 1593: 1579: 1373:

It's currently running at 12 edits per minute, twice the advertised rate. Please adjust.

1341: 1275: 1207: 880: 256: 199: 2189:

Are we accepting version 3.0 CC licences? Got a question from a photographer I contacted.

2025: 1995: 1403:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/2007/August#.7B.7BCincinnati-stub.7D.7D

870: 246:

if you cite a wiki on a term paper, the instructor will laugh at you and give you an "F".

1558:

I know your normal beat is replaceable fair use images, but if you get bored with that,

969:

So now that we're finally getting official copyright advice from the WMF attorney (like

1971: 1959: 1847: 1683:

P.S: Please remember always to run only stable versions of your bot at the toolserver.

1521: 1488: 1426: 1407: 1296:

I've mostly been away from Knowledge (XXG) for a while, and I've returned to find that

1240: 1182: 1132: 1066: 951:

Hi there. I am on your side of the argument on which image should be used as a lead on

457: 1936: 1421:

that if implemented will make way for the deletion of all profession-based entires at

974: 2355: 2328: 2312: 2101: 1789: 1764: 1731: 1692: 1620: 1533: 1516: 302: 247: 203: 178: 159: 1239:

be tagged monotypic symple because there is only one species in the genus on IUCN.

2361: 2344: 2341: 2334: 2318: 2278: 2262: 2237: 2226: 2215: 2195: 2179: 2176: 2156: 2135: 2124: 2104: 2078: 2068: 2058: 2043: 2040: 2022: 1946: 1919: 1908: 1896: 1873: 1870: 1856: 1840: 1819: 1794: 1779: 1776: 1769: 1745: 1706: 1679: 1653: 1650: 1606: 1603: 1596: 1582: 1568: 1548: 1524: 1509: 1506: 1491: 1476: 1467: 1429: 1410: 1388: 1385: 1377: 1356: 1353: 1331: 1305: 1285: 1272: 1261: 1258: 1243: 1230: 1227: 1217: 1214: 1167: 1145: 1142: 1099: 1096: 1092: 1084: 1069: 1052: 1021: 1018: 1012: 999: 959: 956: 937: 927: 906: 903: 889: 873: 848: 845: 817: 803: 800: 792: 774: 764: 761: 741: 721: 718: 711: 671: 642: 639: 617: 593: 590: 569: 556: 543: 540: 533: 508: 505: 494: 491: 483: 480: 467: 464: 440: 437: 423: 410: 407: 396: 377: 374: 366: 357: 343: 340: 332: 328: 305: 287: 284: 277: 271: 265: 250: 234: 231: 223: 208: 181: 172: 169: 162: 1541: 2292: 2273: 2205: 2147:

Knowledge (XXG):Village_pump_(policy)#User_insists_that_logo_is_in_public_domain

1631: 1328: 1302: 1282: 1204: 934: 924: 771: 738: 668: 614: 566: 553: 530: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1502: 864:

doesn't seem to understand that, so I was hoping you could take a look at his

522: 420: 393: 389: 195: 1816: 1715: 1374: 899: 1676: 1671: 2352:

Category talk:Candidates for speedy deletion#NOGALLERY on image categories

1869:

are members, but they don't seem too forthcoming about listing members. –

1226:, which I just created based on a search Polbot was doing this morning. – 356:

Still having problems with the above user uploading copyrighted photos of

1691:...actually the bot has been alot more helpful than a problem...cheers, 952: 945: 814: 789: 529:, etc) are NON monotypic genera. Please stop the Polbot and check these. 490:

have any new information, or I can change them to redirects otherwise. –

1498: 1497:

Luckily for me, the IUCN only lists plants and animals! :-) I'll leave

526: 2150: 705:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Allegations of Chinese apartheid

2231:

Never mind, the ShareAlike is there now (or I didn't see it before).

697:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Allegations of French apartheid

1271:

All the plants falsely tagged as "monotypic" have now been fixed. –

955:. I am going to get permission fron the user to use it in wikipedia. 1091:

only non-commercial entities can use it, then we'll have to find a

392:

allows you to fish for data like that? (Ouch. That pun hurt!) —

1866: 1183:"Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information" 2175:

Thank you in advance for any thoughts you may have on the topic.

1830: 1352:

Gajdusek, I could try e-mailing him personally. All the best, –

1318: 703:, is currently being discussed on AfD. Comments can be left at 586:

monotypic. I've reverted those Polbot changes on those species.

326:. In any event your thoughts on the matter are welcome... -- 25: 2163:

Notification of discussion: Guideline/policy governing lists

1935: 1865:

claim to be, via a userbox. I suspect the contacts listed

1344:

has changed over time. We are now (according to our first

521:

Hi Quadell, sorry, but there are errors, the most genera (

52:

This archive page covers comments 1551-1600, from roughly

1401:

Thanks for joining the project! There is a discussion at

923:

for feedback to Polbot. Awaiting your response. Regards,

902:

would know -- you might try asking him. All the best, –

699:, you may be interested to know that a related article, 360:

under free license. You've warned this user previously.

1964:

For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,

1463: 865: 830:

Just wondering Polbot should be making articles like

563:

after the genus, with the species name as a redirect

2201:According to this tip to the Signpost, we now do: 2088:Hello. Image:Barry22.jpg has been added again to 1958:and therefore, I've officially declared today as 301:the one that needs to "stay cool"? My goodness... 2256:, if you'd like to support, I'd appreciate it! 1966:enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Quadell! 760:Thanks for noticing this and being diligent! – 1730:To Quadell for all his new birdies...cheers, 1675:. We plan to create your account soon then. -- 933:Thanks, we'll get back to you for help later. 2171:User:Sidatio/Conversations/On list guidelines 8: 2252:I volunteered to be a Commons Flickr review 921:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Lepidoptera 168:You're completely right. I replied there. – 977:makes sense. What do you think? Thanks! -- 732:A user has recently added some pics to the 1470:. You've already warned and blocked once. 1417:Another request. There is a discussion at 283:general-knowledge crosswords. ;-) Cheers, 2290: 2009:This little gift was kindly suggested by 2001:A record of your Day will always be kept 2100:. Could you look into it again, please? 883:, just say so and I'll take care of it. 695:Following your recent participation in 1713: 1588:Just noticed that the same applies to 1224:User:Polbot/taxa listing/non-monotypic 1095:image to use instead. All the best, – 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2021:Dude. I'm floored. Thanks so much! – 1173:But problems with plants aren't done! 241:Get a life outside of Knowledge (XXG) 7: 2309:Category:Replaceable fair use images 1425:. Your input would be appreciated. ( 270:You're doing a great job, Quadell. 156:Image:Nirvana_band_four_members.jpg 2141:Someone brought it up, AGAIN, see 1834:point me toward the right person. 1724:The Articles for Creation Barnstar 1030:Good point. I'll let him know! -- 24: 1315:, in which the caption had been: 717:I had already commented there. – 2291: 1714: 1670: 1560:Category:Rescaled fairuse images 826:Haplochromis sp. nov. 'Amboseli' 701:Allegations of Chinese apartheid 689:Allegations of Chinese apartheid 29: 1931: 1846:FYI, I was pretty happy to get 1423:Category:People from Cincinnati 463:I replied on your talk page. – 2084:Barry Henthorn image revisited 1888:Image:Meredith Jung-En Woo.JPG 1: 1505:to someone braver than me. – 780:Recent IUCN Red List articles 2204:. This is interesting news. 1754:Boerboel and Frikkers, again 1317:Daniel Carleton Gajdusek in 315:I created a bunch of Polbot 198:as a result of my report at 2362:22:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 2345:12:55, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 2335:18:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2319:18:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2279:17:29, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2263:05:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2238:23:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2227:14:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2216:02:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2196:02:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2180:01:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2157:00:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2136:22:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 2105:20:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 2079:22:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 2069:07:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2059:01:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 2044:12:19, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 2026:12:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1996:00:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1920:13:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1909:01:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 1897:01:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 1874:12:28, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1857:22:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1841:22:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1820:22:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1795:04:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1784:I have created an ANI case 1780:02:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1770:02:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1430:16:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 965:Attorney Copyright Opinions 257:Don't make personal attacks 2380: 1950:has been identified as an 1807:An editor has asked for a 1746:23:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1707:23:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1680:22:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1654:12:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1607:20:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 1597:09:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 1592:. Keep up the great work. 1583:09:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 1569:22:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 1549:18:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 1525:18:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 1510:17:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 1492:17:51, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 1477:17:36, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 1437:Wodonga TAFE Radio Article 1411:04:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 1389:10:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 1378:04:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 1357:21:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1332:21:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1311:Ah, that seems to be from 1306:21:41, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1286:20:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1276:20:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1262:18:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1244:18:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1231:17:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1218:17:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1208:17:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1168:14:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1146:12:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1136:03:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1100:22:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 1085:22:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 1070:19:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 1053:00:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1022:21:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 1013:18:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 1000:18:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 960:17:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 938:17:51, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 928:03:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 907:01:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 890:01:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 874:00:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 849:21:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 839:21:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 818:23:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 804:21:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 793:20:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 775:20:11, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 765:18:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 742:18:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 722:18:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 712:15:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 672:23:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 643:23:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 618:22:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 594:21:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 570:20:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 557:20:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 544:18:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 534:12:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 509:03:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 495:18:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 484:11:24, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 468:03:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 441:03:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 424:03:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 411:02:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 397:02:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 378:03:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 367:01:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 344:03:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 333:23:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 306:23:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 288:17:08, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 278:17:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 266:16:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 251:16:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 235:11:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 224:06:54, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 214:Polbot running again soon? 209:04:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 182:01:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 173:01:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 163:01:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 150:An editor has asked for a 2297: 1720: 1886:Could you please delete 1313:Daniel Carleton Gajdusek 1125: 517:Monotypic taxa on Plants 311:Polbot wanted categories 1659:I took a look. Thanks. 1342:non-free content policy 1323:Nobel Prize in Medicine 919:Hi Quadell, Please see 825: 2350:might just be me. See 1940: 1813:Image:Brian Jordan.JPG 1775:ANI can never hurt. – 1122:Kind regards Frikkers 388:Oy! Are you sure the 2301:The Original Barnstar 1939: 1172: 42:of past discussions. 1928:Happy Quadell's Day! 1927: 1615:Conspiracy-mongering 1590:Category:Hydrobiidae 1574:Category:Euconulidae 1464:adding copyvio image 1340:Greetings. Yes, our 915:Response to feedback 2143:Image:SNES logo.svg 436:Go to your room. – 297:"Personal attack"? 2123:infringement (See 1953:Awesome Wikipedian 1941: 1298:Image:Gajdusek.jpg 1292:Image:Gajdusek.jpg 474:New viper articles 2324: 2323: 2307:For clearing out 2214: 2129:Clean room design 2098:User talk:Schaury 2050:Polbot Inactivity 2019: 2018: 2014: 2006: 1751: 1750: 1663:Toolserveraccount 1644: 1630:comment added by 1546:Shawn in Montreal 1346:content-criterion 1126:Polbot's taxonomy 862:User talk:Edwardx 786:Rio Grande darter 751:Image:EOTSF35.jpg 734:F-35 Lightning II 728:Questionable pics 318:wanted categories 64: 63: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Quadell 2371: 2295: 2288: 2287: 2276: 2208: 2118: 2112: 2008: 2000: 1991: 1989: 1987: 1985: 1983: 1932: 1882:Favor on Commons 1792: 1767: 1718: 1711: 1710: 1674: 1643: 1624: 1554:Admin backlog... 1369:Polbot edit rate 1321:when he won the 1165: 1050: 1048: 1042: 1036: 997: 995: 989: 983: 746:THe images are: 451:My image deleted 206: 59: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2379: 2378: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2286: 2274: 2270: 2250: 2187: 2165: 2120: 2116: 2110: 2086: 2052: 2033: 1981: 1979: 1977: 1975: 1973: 1930: 1884: 1827: 1809:deletion review 1805: 1790: 1765: 1756: 1689: 1665: 1625: 1617: 1576: 1556: 1538: 1484: 1460: 1439: 1399: 1371: 1294: 1175: 1162:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 1159: 1154: 1128: 1112: 1077: 1063: 1046: 1040: 1034: 1032: 993: 987: 981: 979: 967: 949: 917: 857: 828: 782: 754:Image:EOTS2.jpg 748:Image:EOTS1.JPG 730: 693: 519: 476: 453: 386: 354: 313: 243: 216: 204: 192: 190:Boerboel, again 152:deletion review 148: 146:Deletion review 143: 58:August 16, 2007 57: 53: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2377: 2375: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2322: 2321: 2304: 2303: 2298: 2296: 2285: 2282: 2269: 2266: 2249: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2186: 2183: 2164: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2119: 2108: 2090:Barry Henthorn 2085: 2082: 2076:70.179.175.240 2066:70.179.175.240 2051: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2032: 2029: 2017: 2016: 2007: 1994: 1970: 1965: 1963: 1957: 1942: 1929: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1848:Cindy Margolis 1826: 1823: 1804: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1727: 1726: 1721: 1719: 1688: 1685: 1682: 1668: 1667:Hello Quadell, 1664: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1575: 1572: 1555: 1552: 1537: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1483: 1480: 1459: 1453: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1398: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1370: 1367: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1349: 1335: 1334: 1293: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1220: 1174: 1171: 1153: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1127: 1124: 1111: 1108: 1103: 1102: 1076: 1073: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1025: 1024: 1015: 966: 963: 948: 944:Lead image on 942: 941: 940: 916: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 896: 856: 853: 852: 851: 827: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 810: 781: 778: 768: 767: 729: 726: 725: 724: 692: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 587: 575: 574: 573: 572: 559: 547: 546: 518: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 498: 497: 475: 472: 471: 470: 452: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 429: 428: 427: 426: 414: 413: 385: 382: 381: 380: 353: 348: 347: 346: 312: 309: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 242: 239: 238: 237: 221:70.179.170.133 215: 212: 191: 188: 187: 186: 185: 184: 147: 144: 142: 141: 136: 131: 126: 121: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 81: 76: 71: 65: 62: 61: 54:August 3, 2007 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2376: 2363: 2360: 2357: 2353: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2343: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2333: 2330: 2320: 2317: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2305: 2302: 2299: 2294: 2289: 2283: 2281: 2280: 2277: 2268:CorenSeachBot 2267: 2265: 2264: 2261: 2259: 2258:Videmus Omnia 2255: 2247: 2239: 2236: 2234: 2233:Videmus Omnia 2230: 2229: 2228: 2225: 2223: 2222:Videmus Omnia 2219: 2218: 2217: 2212: 2207: 2203: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2192: 2191:Videmus Omnia 2184: 2182: 2181: 2178: 2173: 2172: 2168: 2162: 2158: 2155: 2151: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2115: 2109: 2107: 2106: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2083: 2081: 2080: 2077: 2071: 2070: 2067: 2061: 2060: 2057: 2049: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2030: 2028: 2027: 2024: 2015: 2012: 2011:Videmus Omnia 2004: 1998: 1997: 1993: 1992: 1967: 1961: 1960:Quadell's day 1955: 1954: 1949: 1948: 1943: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1921: 1918: 1916: 1915:Videmus Omnia 1912: 1911: 1910: 1907: 1905: 1904:Videmus Omnia 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1895: 1893: 1892:Videmus Omnia 1889: 1881: 1875: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1855: 1853: 1852:Videmus Omnia 1849: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1837: 1836:Videmus Omnia 1832: 1824: 1822: 1821: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1802: 1796: 1793: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1778: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1768: 1761: 1753: 1747: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1709: 1708: 1704: 1701: 1698: 1694: 1686: 1684: 1681: 1678: 1673: 1662: 1660: 1655: 1652: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1622: 1621:William Greer 1614: 1608: 1605: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1581: 1573: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1565: 1564:Videmus Omnia 1561: 1553: 1551: 1550: 1547: 1543: 1535: 1534:Riverboarding 1532: 1526: 1523: 1519: 1518: 1517:Gallus gallus 1513: 1512: 1511: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1481: 1479: 1478: 1475: 1473: 1472:Videmus Omnia 1469: 1465: 1457: 1454: 1452: 1449: 1445: 1442: 1436: 1431: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1412: 1409: 1404: 1397: 1396:WP:CINCINNATI 1394: 1390: 1387: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1376: 1368: 1366: 1358: 1355: 1350: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1333: 1330: 1326: 1324: 1320: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1299: 1291: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1274: 1263: 1260: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1245: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1201: 1198: 1196: 1190: 1186: 1184: 1178: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1163: 1151: 1147: 1144: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1123: 1120: 1116: 1109: 1107: 1101: 1098: 1094: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1074: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1061:Taxa listings 1060: 1054: 1051: 1049: 1043: 1037: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1007: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 998: 996: 990: 984: 976: 972: 964: 962: 961: 958: 954: 947: 943: 939: 936: 932: 931: 930: 929: 926: 922: 914: 908: 905: 901: 897: 893: 892: 891: 888: 886: 885:Videmus Omnia 882: 878: 877: 876: 875: 872: 867: 866:image uploads 863: 854: 850: 847: 843: 842: 841: 840: 837: 833: 819: 816: 811: 807: 806: 805: 802: 797: 796: 795: 794: 791: 787: 779: 777: 776: 773: 766: 763: 758: 757: 756: 755: 752: 749: 744: 743: 740: 735: 727: 723: 720: 716: 715: 714: 713: 710: 706: 702: 698: 690: 687: 673: 670: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 644: 641: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 619: 616: 612: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 595: 592: 588: 585: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 571: 568: 564: 560: 558: 555: 551: 550: 549: 548: 545: 542: 538: 537: 536: 535: 532: 528: 524: 516: 510: 507: 502: 501: 500: 499: 496: 493: 488: 487: 486: 485: 482: 473: 469: 466: 462: 461: 460: 459: 450: 442: 439: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 425: 422: 418: 417: 416: 415: 412: 409: 405: 401: 400: 399: 398: 395: 391: 383: 379: 376: 371: 370: 369: 368: 365: 363: 362:Videmus Omnia 359: 352: 349: 345: 342: 337: 336: 335: 334: 331: 330: 325: 320: 319: 310: 308: 307: 304: 300: 289: 286: 281: 280: 279: 276: 273: 269: 268: 267: 264: 262: 261:Videmus Omnia 258: 255: 254: 253: 252: 249: 240: 236: 233: 228: 227: 226: 225: 222: 213: 211: 210: 207: 201: 197: 189: 183: 180: 176: 175: 174: 171: 167: 166: 165: 164: 161: 157: 153: 145: 140: 137: 135: 132: 130: 127: 125: 122: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 66: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2325: 2300: 2271: 2251: 2188: 2174: 2169: 2166: 2125:Phoenix BIOS 2121: 2094:User:Schaury 2087: 2072: 2062: 2053: 2034: 2020: 1999: 1972: 1968: 1952: 1951: 1945: 1944: 1885: 1863:these people 1828: 1806: 1803:Brian Jordan 1759: 1757: 1738: 1723: 1699: 1690: 1666: 1658: 1618: 1577: 1557: 1539: 1515: 1485: 1468:Jewel Mische 1461: 1456:User:Stabora 1450: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1400: 1372: 1363: 1316: 1295: 1270: 1236: 1202: 1199: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1179: 1177:Hi Quadell, 1176: 1161: 1160: 1155: 1129: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1104: 1093:free content 1078: 1064: 1031: 978: 968: 950: 918: 858: 836:WarthogDemon 829: 783: 769: 745: 731: 694: 610: 583: 562: 520: 477: 454: 390:site license 387: 384:Fish species 358:Jewel Mische 355: 351:User:Stabora 327: 316: 314: 298: 296: 244: 217: 193: 149: 103: 43: 37: 2185:CC licences 2056:75.18.15.45 1626:—Preceding 1594:Valentinian 1580:Valentinian 1462:Once again 219:quickly. -- 36:This is an 2248:Canvassing 1542:Please see 1503:Firmicutes 895:monuments. 871:Seattlenow 855:Image help 667:Thank you. 523:Biscutella 196:User:jossi 104:Archive 32 1825:Need help 1522:KP Botany 1489:KP Botany 1427:Mind meal 1408:Mind meal 1241:KP Botany 1222:See also 1181:W. said: 1133:KP Botany 1075:Refractor 1067:KP Botany 1041:seriously 1006:like this 988:seriously 900:User:Lupo 458:AmyNelson 2356:Garion96 2329:Garion96 2313:Garion96 2102:Canuckle 1791:VanTucky 1766:VanTucky 1742:contribs 1732:Casliber 1703:contribs 1693:Casliber 1640:contribs 1628:unsigned 1544:Thanks, 1514:Oh, you 1482:Taxonomy 1203:Thanks. 1110:Boerboel 1080:picture. 953:Barefoot 946:Barefoot 329:Prove It 303:Nagaflas 248:Nagaflas 205:VanTucky 179:fuzzy510 160:fuzzy510 2342:Quadell 2177:Sidatio 2114:PD-font 2041:Quadell 2023:Quadell 1947:Quadell 1871:Quadell 1777:Quadell 1651:Quadell 1604:Quadell 1507:Quadell 1499:Archaea 1386:Quadell 1354:Quadell 1273:Quadell 1259:Quadell 1228:Quadell 1215:Quadell 1195:Wedelia 1152:The Bot 1143:Quadell 1097:Quadell 1019:Quadell 957:0reteki 904:Quadell 846:Quadell 801:Quadell 762:Quadell 719:Quadell 640:Quadell 591:Quadell 584:appears 541:Quadell 527:Wedelia 506:Jwinius 492:Quadell 481:Jwinius 465:Quadell 438:Quadell 408:Quadell 404:WP:AN/I 375:Quadell 341:Quadell 324:elepids 285:Jacklee 272:ElinorD 232:Quadell 170:Quadell 39:archive 2359:(talk) 2332:(talk) 2316:(talk) 2275:Keegan 1632:Barnej 1536:images 1329:Harmil 1303:Harmil 1283:Berton 1205:Berton 1082:Fkarno 1008:? :P - 935:AshLin 925:AshLin 881:WP:PUI 772:BillCJ 739:BillCJ 709:ChrisO 669:Berton 615:Berton 567:Berton 554:Berton 531:Berton 275:(talk) 200:WP:AN3 2206:nadav 1969:Love, 1861:Well 1760:exact 1687:Award 1466:] to 1458:again 1237:never 1047:folks 994:folks 707:. -- 421:Coren 394:Coren 16:< 2284:Star 2254:here 2211:talk 2154:Nard 2145:and 2133:Nard 2031:NCPD 2003:here 1867:here 1831:PETA 1817:Geni 1786:here 1736:talk 1697:talk 1677:DaB. 1636:talk 1501:and 1375:Alai 1319:1976 1010:Nard 975:WP:C 971:here 832:this 1811:of 1520:. 1197:! 1035:But 982:But 815:Hqb 790:Hqb 691:AfD 299:I'm 154:of 56:to 2354:. 2311:. 2127:, 2117:}} 2111:{{ 2092:. 2074:-- 2064:-- 1788:. 1744:) 1705:) 1642:) 1638:• 1413:) 1185:. 525:, 259:. 139:50 134:40 129:37 124:36 119:35 114:34 109:33 99:31 94:30 89:29 84:28 79:27 74:20 69:10 2213:) 2209:( 2013:. 2005:. 1990:l 1988:e 1986:i 1984:r 1982:d 1980:e 1978:a 1976:h 1974:P 1962:! 1956:, 1739:· 1734:( 1700:· 1695:( 1634:( 1432:) 1406:( 1325:. 1044:| 1038:| 991:| 985:| 60:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index