User talk:Quadell/Archive 30

3208:, as is also well-known, at present almost anyone in Iran who has contacts with people outside Iran, is in real danger of being accused of being a spy or an agent of foreign powers. Given this fact, sending e-mails to Iran (enquiring about such details as seem to be required for photographs) almost never results in a response. People do not risk their livelihoods for providing such frivolous information as who took a particular potograph, let stand the fact that these photographs are those of Taqizadeh and Forough Farrokhzad. Given these verifiable facts, and given the fact that the photographs in question are by any standard public property, I hope and expect that Knowledge (XXG) can show some understanding. It is no good that my time on these pages be spent on writing such lengthy texts as this; I am here to make some useful contribution to learning (to the best of my ability), and not to write twenty messages to the likes of Abu Badalis who seem not to know what common sense is! (At times I have thought that Abu Badali might be some piece of badly-written software, impervious to reason.) 1256:, people find what what they are looking for and perhaps remember the proper name. I don't think it needs dumbing down and the emergent problems of naming to alleged commons names is fraught with complications, I know of two online databases that made up names to occupy a field with no research. So called scientific names must be reviewed and accepted, this authority easily overides the the sources of canonical names given here. Another editor disagrees with this view on frogs in Australia, but he said the ones on my side of the country were not important enough to warrant concern. Most large fluffy or scary mammals get a page name like tiger, but even that is fraught with problems. About 95% of species on the planet will not have a common name, we might as well be orderly about it. So I have gone ahead and moved it, mind how you go with the article creation drive and please consider looking into what some people reckon is beyond dispute. Give em a binomial and everybody finds it. Answers to questions you did not ask, but there you go. Regards 3212:

am absolutely puzzled that after several months this Abu Badali has again targeted the same photograph. It seems to me that he must be obsessed by this very photograph. Please kindly let him know that he should avoid crossing my path, or I will seriously consider to leave Knowledge (XXG) for good. Further, please let this be our last correspondence on this subject, as in all sincerity I am beginning to believe that I am wasting my time on these pages for matters of absolutely no relevance; I am very conscious of the fact that I am not going to live this life for a second time. I thank you in advance for the trouble. With kind regards,

1436:, had some links and text describing the image. Any chance you could copy that information to the talk page? For me personally for this image, I have enough information to recreate the image (I take it the link you gave me came from the description page). But for future replaceable fair-use images that you delete, could you take the time to copy pertinent descriptive information to the talk page? That is, information that'd help in recreating a free version would be useful to archive; otherwise it might be difficult to know just what was there to begin with. 1905:

obviously holds the copyright. So what good does it do to link to Amazon? The reason we need a source is so we can determine who the copyright holder is, and (in some cases) how it's used or distributed, but in major-label DVDs it's obvious. I don't think a "link source" is needed for DVD covers, CD covers, game covers, book covers, etc., when there is no question who holds the copyright. It seems pointless to find a web-sales site to link to, just to keep an image from being deleted. But that's just my opinion of the day. :-) All the best, –

3253:. Since Travis Randell is living and still plays hockey, someone could still photograph him, and that photo could be released under a free license. If you would like to obtain a free image of him, you have several options: you could take a photo of him yourself, you could find a photo of him taken by another person and ask them to release that photo under a free license, or you could write to Mr. Randell or his agent and ask them if they would provide an image licensed under the GFDL (or another free license). All the best, – 2856:(edit conflict) Every time I archive my talk pages, I say "archiving chit-chat" in the edit summary. It's nothing personal, I promise -- please don't take it that way. I like to only have the ten or twenty most recent comments on my talk page at any given time. Otherwise, it gets unwieldy. If you have something more to add, just say it. But I don't try to dictate what you can have on your talk page, and I'd appreciate it if you don't try to dictate what I can have on mine. – 3437:, that's a tricky situation. Many countries don't have that sort of a categorization, but some do. I'm not sure how to tell ahead of time when to use "birds of. . ." and when to use "fauna of. . .", so it currently just uses "fauna of". When Polbot is finished creating species articles, she could go back and look in all bird articles she wrote, substituting "fauna of" with "birds of" for countries that include it. I'll have to think some more about that. 31: 3856:. Anyhow, I'm scratching my head now over whether Knowledge (XXG) differentiates between a fair-use subject of a picture and a fair-use picture itself. It's the same question that arose in the earlier IFD but never got resolved since the image got axed. Anyhow, any input either here or on the discussion page would be appreciated -- I'm trying to figure the ins and outs of fair-use but am still muddled in a few spots. -- 1419:, actually does say seven days when the appropriate field, "old-image=yes", is used. I take it from your comments that the original tagger didn't use this field. But I find it odd that you deleted it anyway since you acknowledge yourself that images uploaded before July '06 are supposed to get seven days. Perhaps you only realized this after you deleted it. I'm just asking for a little more caution, that's all. 791: 2482:

doesn't really count as the creator--it's merely doing the technical work of creating the taxobox and holder page for you. These are important organisms to have articles about and identifying them with these bot created stubs is important work. I do want a scheme of all the bot created plant articles from the ICUN, though, as that will help us look at them.

574:. I usually edit and creat some albums-articles, the cover I always download them from website like: or others. I always uploaded as an album cover. Can you explain please, the how do I preceed to download and upload in Wiki in order to respect the copyrigts with the images cover, please? I though I was doing ok, but I still have to learn a lot. Thanks, -- 3035:

bot's contributions to Knowledge (XXG). You and Fred are both good editors, let's just reach some usable agreement. I would like to convince people that the bot's contributions are important to Knowledge (XXG), but can't if conversaions are abruptly cut. However, these conversations can be maintained on a different user subpage, if there are too many.

2516:

than a stub. I could rush the task, that would be unethical and yet they are an embarrassment. I am surprised this was not anticipated when you checked if this was okay, or that you weren't shown the template before?! The question is why, we are not a mirror site. I hope you don't mind me expressing an opinion on this, again. Regards,

2689:

chunks of it? The WP:BIRD project seems to want to go over Polbot bird articles and improve them, so such a list sorted into obvious groups might be a good idea. What do you think? You could have added a "created by Polbot" category (either on its own or in a template) when creating the talk pages, but that is probably too late now.

3699:

relevant family article, and if it didn't find them, not create the article. Second-best would be to go ahead and create the article but flag it as needing human attention. Either of these would be much better than what it's been doing. But these are just my opinions, and I don't know how feasible the suggestions are. —

842:

provokes a cascade of free pictures from other supermodels, do we feature them all? Use of this picture could come across as "wow, we have a really good free pic on this subject, let's put it in some other articles as well", rather than "let's find the right picture for each article". Incidentially, have a look at

592:, which is required for all non-free images.) You're correct that the image would be acceptable if it had this, so I restored the image and re-added it to the article. I added the correct copyright tag and a use rationale, so that the image will not be deleted again in the future. Check out what I added at 3851:

is a sort of precedent, I tagged a few other Transformers-related -boxart images for speedy deletion -- some of them lacked a fair-use rationale, source info, etc. In general, it simply seems that these toys can be illustrated with a picture of the toy rather than the boxart. I opened up a discussion

3583:

It's true that Polbot doesn't add species to genera she didn't create. That's because I wouldn't know where to add the information. (Some genus articles list species in the taxobox, some in the text, some just say "many", etc.) She'd probably end up listing the species incorrectly as often as she did

3020:

I'm sorry if my tone sounded curt, but if you've monitored this talk page, you know about the massive number of conversations involving PolBot here. If they were maintained on this page, it would be a useless page - nobodies going to read 50k of talk page before adding their own comment. It's just as

3010:

I don't mind if someone resurrects a thread and comments further. I encourage that. What I mind is when someone reverts me, re-adding eight threads at once, and not adding to the discussion on any of them. That's just rude. Some people leave comments on their talk pages for 2 weeks -- that's nice for

2824:

The posts were current, today, your blanking of the page does little to facilitate the dicussion. I assume that users will leave discussion relating to their actions on wikipedia talk pages. When they don't I wonder why. Why is it neccesssary to remove the "chit chat", as you somewhat flippantly term

1284:

This image is in no danger of copyright violation, it is low resolution, and yet impossible to find a "freeuse" version thus far (and I've been searching for one for almost a year -- these trophies are kept under lock and key in an office most of the year). I am asking that you assume good faith and

1280:

The image itself was of a trophy that is not at public disposal and is very hard to get an image of. I've gone to the extent of e-mailing the team which posted the image and the governing body which owns the trophy, the Ontario Hockey Association, but this is their off-season so I doubt I will get a

3538:

But if the artist only allows Knowledge (XXG) to use it, and doesn't allow anyone else to use it, then I'm afraid Knowledge (XXG) policy won't let us use the image. Since we're a "free" encyclopedia, we only use images anyone could use. If that's the case, then we can't use it no matter what options

3211:

For completeness, several months ago this Abu Badali marked the photograph of Taqizadeh for deletion. At the time I had some lengthy correspondence with him on this particular photograph. Then some moderator intervened and said that my Licensing was fine and the matter was resolved there and then. I

2515:

If I had my 'druthers' I would would have said this was not a good idea. I was still finding good sources for binomials when they were blued. It rather forces peoples hand to manually check what has been automatically produced from an unreliable source. DYK aside, they now exist as something less

2481:

Or if it doesn't, change the rules. Nothing polbot adds to Knowledge (XXG) detracts from the need to research, plant, and write more than the stub it created. In fact, it's barely more than a redlink, with taxoboxes. And, you still get the thrill of creating the new page for real, as the bot edit

2220:

Why did you remove the World Business Class picture for Northwest Airlines. As I stated before, the image cannot be replaced unless someone were to fly on World Business Class, take a picture, and replace it with that. I have been comprehensively editing that page for years now, and you seem to be

1007:

It looks like it. This was probably a case where Polbot tried to write the article, and Knowledge (XXG)'s servers went briefly "read-only" so the servers could synch up, and so the article never got written. But by the time Polbot tried to write the talk page, the server was back up. I think this'll

757:

Somewhat of a minor point, but I've also noticed that Polbot will speak in the present tense when creating pages for extinct species. Could be confusing--I had to go back to the source information to determine if it was just a local extinction and the species is still living in the distribution that

299:

Yep. You need to have WWW::Mechanize installed first. Perlwikipedia depends on several other packages, which have to be installed in order for Perlwikipedia to work. Are you on a UNIX box, I assume? Do you have administrator rights on the machine? If the answer to both questions is yes, then you can

2668:

If the image was being used to show what the actress looks like, then we can't use a non-free image (such as a TV screenshot) to depict her. This is because someone could still photograph her, and that photo could be released under a free license. That makes the image "replaceable", and a violation

2449:

Finally, and I realise that this is possibly very contrary to the spirit of Knowledge (XXG), but its sad to see all those redlinks vanish. It is rewarding to start new pages from scratch, research plan and write them. Running after a bot cleaning up hundreds of identical articles isn't as much fun.

2430:

Bird taxonomy is very fluid, and there isn't one authority we use. What I'm after is for the genus and species articles to match what the family pages are saying. If the family page says x y and z are in genus b, then the genus b page should say it too. Also, in cases where we have a single species

1604:

This image was originally released only under a "non-commercial-only" license. I'm afraid we cannot accept images unless they can be used by anyone, even commercially. I see that the image has now been reuploaded under the GFDL, which allows commercial reuse, so there is no further problem with the

1405:

Regarding your comment, "It's a creative argument, but it's clearly wrong," I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I don't think it was clearly wrong, nor do I think the argument that it wasn't "reasonable" to replace the image was clearly wrong; the two arguments were at odds, and I think there

1276:

Hello, I uploaded a non-free fairuse image of the Greater Mid-Ontario Hockey League's championship trophy. It was later tagged as a possible replaceable image. I chose to put on the "hold on" template and stated my case as to why it was not replaceable within the template, but the image was swept

546:

I can't find the Asteraceae articles you've added as you've added so many toads. Anyway, corrected a couple of common names, and changed some of the endemic to, but I'll leave that for a bot clean up at some time. I'd like to see some California natives added, as I know these better than the ones

3698:

In general, I think it would be great if, when Polbot finds a problem, it does nothing except maybe generate a notice that there's something a human can work on. This would go a long way toward dealing with taxonomic inconsistencies: it could check for the species names (English and Latin) in the

3203:

over there. Taqizadeh, having been the President of Iran's Senate (defunct since 1979), is one of them; Forough Farrokhzad is another (for her sexually explicit poetry; her brother was moreover assassinated by the agents of Iran's present regime in Germany in 1992). Given these facts, as much as I

3034:

We're also still discussing a number of issues raised in archived threads, here and at AN/I. It might be useful to have a separate page for the bot talk, but there weren't currently 50K, so let's keep the examples real. Quadell, you're doing a good job working with people, and I appreciate your

2988:

It is common Knowledge (XXG) practice to resurrect archived talk page threads if they are unfinished. The method varies from starting a new thread to linking to the old thread to copying it out verbatim. Phrases such as "is this what we've come to" don't actually help move the discussion forward.

1904:

This is a good example for me to mention a concern of mine about the use of the nsd tag -- something that's been bugging me for a while, but I'm not sure where to mention it. Is Amazon really the source? Amazon didn't create the image, and doesn't hold the copyright. They just host the image; MGM

1295:

I absolutely believe that you uploaded this image in good faith. However we still cannot use the image. The trophy still exists and could still be photographed. Perhaps it is behind glass, perhaps it during specific occasions, but it certainly exists, and I highly doubt that will be the last time

1199:

Hi Quadell, I noticed your download when I went to launch a draft. I should let you know that I moved the species to their ascribed names, the binomial one. I hope you think this was ok. Did you know there is a template for this, IUCN 2006, I was wondering if it could go into the routine. Cheers,

152:

I'm dying to see how the featured picture debate comes out - I never imagined the reactions that it would get. You'd think it was the first picture of a woman ever nominated. Anyway, she contacted me again providing more sources for her bio, so I'll likely be improving the article this weekend in

3187:

Dear Quadell, thank you for your kind message. To be brief: I do not know what the problem can be with the above two photographs that they have been marked for deletion. Concerning the photograph of Taqizadeh, the photograph is almost 50 years old so that for the past 20 years it has been public

2884:

decided was over. It would surely be advantageous, if you did not have to repeat answers you have now archived. The archive is not the first place that people come for current discussion, a new editor would not even notice it was there. Are their views and access invalid as well? I suppose the

2394:

for details.) I'm actually importing all species -- plants, birds, amphibians, mammals -- and I'm getting a lot of useful feedback from WikiProject members on how to improve things. Still, it's impossible to prevent all taxonomic peculiarities ahead of time. I figure an article on a species with

841:

was interesting! It's over now (I missed it), so I thought I'd put some thoughts here. First, it was predictable that people would misunderstand your motives for nominating the picture, and putting it and the related pics in lots of articles (OK, five) was, well, maybe not the best move. If this

3632:

Speaking of the IUCN, it lists countries where species occur as vagrants. I think that status needs to be noted in Knowledge (XXG) articles. Personally, I'd be happy with leaving those countries out, or putting them in with a notation such as "(as a vagrant)", or setting up something like "It

2955:

The thread Fred is referring to is one where I asked him how to use a certain template, and he answered. He also gave some other information that he called "answers to questions I did not ask". That's it. It was over. I had nothing more to say, and if he had, I'm sure he would have said it. Why

2734:

bot. Though the log will also include new articles created by other users, and existing pages tagged with the WikiProject's tag. There are limits though. Check out the notice at the bottom "Log truncated as it is too huge!". A clean list from Polbot's contributions (or Quadell) would be better.

2688:

Hi Quadell. In that AN thread, I mentioned that I had asked if you would be keeping details of the run dates and times of each function. Did you ever manage to do that? I also see you mention a big list of articles that Polbot has created. Do you think you could provide such a list, or at least

2632:

I see there's already Much Ado about this. But on what I hope is a lighter note: when you're planning a large batch of these, would you consider giving the stub-sorting project a "heads up" beforehand, so consideration can be given to avoiding the associated stub type suddenly becoming hugely

3649:

I didn't know about that thread. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! I see what you (and Sabine's Sunbird) mean now. I'm not sure the best way to include those. Would I look through "what links here" for the new genus, perhaps? Hm. And differing taxonomies are a problem, but I don't have a

1027:

was less enthusiastic than I had hoped for. It looks like it might just be us two for now. Maybe the best thing to do is to set up a separate project page, get the concept working, and then write the 380 or so pages as subpages, and I can work on one or two of them and get people interested in

2929:

Probably the speed of the archiving. I've been following this talk page for a while now, and I did notice that the archiving was (a) fast and (b) done with the edit summary "archiving chit chat". I know that the fast archiving is because the page often gets flooded with complaints about image

362:

The whole thing may take an hour to run. (The first two lines reinstall the latest version of CPAN, which is used to install packages. Then you re-install Mechanize, because doing so from the latest version of CPAN will make problems less likely to occur.) Hopefully that's all you'll need for

2879:

page. Your contention that this is yours is debatable. Your actions are having a wide ranging effect, I would opt for transparency if it were me. Your apology is not required by me, your manner indicates disdain for our community to me. I won't speculate as to your motives for obscuring the

1328:

Further, there was a dispute as to whether the image merited deletion. Specifically, someone had argued that the image was uncreative and therefore uncopyrightable. Though I don't really agree, isn't such a reasoned dispute better settled at IfD than through the speedy deletion process?

877:. Those are good examples of when a photograph can be encyclopedic. I don't happen to think that the Merkin ones are in any way encyclopedic, and that should be the primary criterion of a featured pic. I'm not going to do anything, but don't be too surprised if this issue reappears later. 3204:(or anybody else in my position for that matter) would wish, there is simply no way that I can get access to the details that I am asked about: I cannot write to a State Ministry in Iran and ask about the details concerning these photographs, such as who took these photographs, etc. 1324:

This image was tagged with the "replaceable fair use" template. I was in the middle of trying to create a replacement when you deleted the image, and I'm not sure the reference image I'm using is the same. Could you please restore the image so that I can create a faithful replica?

267:

perl upload.pl Can't locate WWW/Mechanize.pm in @INC (@INC contains: C:/Perl/lib C:/Perl/site/l ib .) at C:/Perl/site/lib/Perlwikipedia.pm line 4. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at C:/Perl/site/lib/Perlwikipedia.pm line 4. Compilation failed in require at upload.pl line 6. BEGIN

639:

How many times do i have to upload an image for you to delete it? More specifically JNA.jpg. I uploaded that image and edited the page, and you deleted it, why is that? Im getting seriously sick of your deleting of everything i upload, and there being no consistancy to it either.

2059:. And why? To make Knowledge (XXG) as comprehensive as possible. To quote a random Wikipedian, "I believe that through the dedicated efforts that I see everywhere through the Project pages, it will someday be relied on as a standard reference. To be part of this is fantastic." – 3584:

so correctly. Also, sometimes the article at the name of the genus isn't really about the genus at all (but redirects). I can't really tell when that is, so I think it's best to leave out the list of new species unless Polbot created the article and knows how it's set up.

1042:

Quadell, first of all, I would like to congratulate you on this amazing initiative of running Polbot on IUCN red lists. I would suggest, if possible, that was also made a categorization according to the Floras of each country where there is local endemism. Example:

1352:

I think that should give you all you need to create a faithful replica. As to your second point, the image clearly has enough creative content to qualify for copyright. It's a creative argument, but it's clearly wrong, so I saw no reason to transfer the case to

3600:

I think the problem Sabine's Sunbird means is the reverse. When Polbot creates a genus article, it (I heard she doesn't like being anthropomorphized) puts in species it created, but doesn't list species with existing articles. For instance, Polbot created

1368:, says 2 days. It looks like the image was given the wrong template -- images uploaded before July 13, 2006, are given 7 days, while images uploaded after this date are given 2 days, and this image was uploaded in February of 2006. You may want to speak to 3320:

Excuse me for barging in, but since the picture seems to be on a newspaper site, I wonder whether it was work for hire or a paper has bought any rights to it. In the U.S., I think that would create copyright problems—but I know nothing (zip, zero,

353:

perl -MCPAN -e 'install Bundle::CPAN' reload cpan perl -MCPAN -e 'install Bundle::LWP' perl -MCPAN -e 'install WWW::Mechanize' perl -MCPAN -e 'install HTML::Entities' perl -MCPAN -e 'install HTTP::Response' perl -MCPAN -e 'install URI::Escape'

1119: 1115: 2274:

For some reason, I think the "photos of adult entertainers" section would get more hits that the "photos of Libertarian commentators" section. Not that Libertarian commentators are bad looking folks, but the competition would be rough. :) –

1546:

Ooooh. That's very nice. I don't know that we have consensus on what to do with many of these, though. For albums in discographies, it's pretty clear that they need to be removed, but for lists of minor characters, I'm not sure at all. –

611:

Quadell, could you please semi-protect my user page? I give that URL out to a lot of the celebrities I contact (to show who I really am) and I don't want them to run across a vandalized version of it should I not be online. Thanks!

2930:

deletions, and that "chit chat" is the term Quadell uses when archiving, but I can also understand why someone new to the talk page would be a bit taken aback by this. Fast archiving is not opaque, but it can cut discussion short.

2294:

as an orphaned talk page. While that page was orphaned, it was an archived deletion debate of the page it was attached to; the result of the more primitive archiving process back in the days of "votes for deletion" (VfD). See

1332:

Lastly, the speedy deletion criteria and the template both say the uploader has seven days before the image gets deleted, but you deleted the image after just four days. In the future, could you please respect those limits?

3625:

article, since I happened to work on that species today, but all the new genera need to be checked for missing species. Fortunately, I think there are complete lists of species at the family articles that Polbot can work

1665:

You mean the one where I took out 13 non-free images? Yeah, I remember. Are you suggesting it was irresponsible for me to take out some and not others? The "you ought to have a word with him" comment wasn't very civil. –

1028:

working on the other ones. I'm also thinking that some way to sort the articles by nationality would be helpful, as the intricacies of sortkey stuff changes from country to country. Any ideas on how that could be done?

2533:

As Fred resurrected this thread, let's finish off the loose ends. How about a list of all the bird articles that Polbot has created? Sabine's Sunbird has asked for that above. Is that possible? Seems reasonable to me.

3524:

Is the artist willing to allow anyone to use it, and not just Knowledge (XXG)? And is he or she willing to allow modifications? If so, then great! It's a "free image", and we can use it with no problems. Just tag it

2825:

the concerns raised here. Archives are for old discussion, not todays. This does nothing for the transparency of the massive process you have undertaken, why have you undone my revert? What purpose can it serve?

524:

That's weird. I'm afraid I don't know anything about Vista. My guess is that the error is caused by Vista trying to make sure that scripts can't install programs, but I have no idea how to get around it. Sorry. –

1162:(not copyrighted), or else explicitly released under a free license (such as the GFDL). Since you didn't list the source of the image, I can't check, but nearly all images you find on webpages are "non-free". – 3011:

them, but if I did that I would currently have 187 comments (no exaggeration). Although few of them would be as pointless as this one, which seems focused on criticism of, of all things, my archiving habits. –

1047:

with Flora of Madagascar. I have been making this manually, because I consider very important to gather these information in relationship with the country from where these species are originated. Thank you.

1215:

Greetings. Is that a plant species? If so, I've changed Polbot to always put plant articles under the binomial name, rather than the common name. I didn't know there was an IUCN template! What's it called? –

960:

This is a photograph of a living person. Since the subject is still alive, someone could still photograph her and release that photo under a free license. That's why the photo is replaceable. All the best, –

308:

If you're on Windows (using ActivePerl), try using doublequotes instead of singlequotes. If you don't have administrator rights, you'll have to cajole an admin to install the package for you. All the best, –

2553:

One (or more) subpage(s) of WP:BIRD, or your own userpages, would be best. Also, can you have the bot add the authors to the genus pages you create? The infor is for the most part avaliable on Wikispecies.

2602:

where people have expressed that they are unsure about the legality of the bots current task I have temporarily blocked the bot. Incidentally, the edit rate is far higher than what it was approved for.

1252:), are very likely to have more than one name. The genera and the rest of the taxonomy moves down to a category of unsystemized and subjective decisions about which common name to choose, e.g. I moved 911:. I was planning on finishing it sometime over the next couple of days, but I'd welcome your feedback on what I've done so far, particularly on whether or not it's an essay the community could use. 838: 780: 654:, you are not the copyright holder. The image is a "derivative work" and, as such, the copyright belongs to the original copyright holder, and the image is not free. (For more information, see 3751:

I use a script to help me do this. I wouldn't feel comfortable having a bot do this unmonitored. Besides, I have to delete the images at the same time, and bots can't do that. Thanks though. –

1303:. There, a bunch of experts on our policy will decide whether my decision to delete the image was correct or not. But to be honest, the decision isn't likely to be overturned. I'm sorry. – 3346:? I notice many of the articles say something like "it is endemic to country X." Those seemed to be missing from the articles about Indonesian species I checked (most of which are visible 1277:

away with the rest of the images and my reasoning seemingly was ignored. I'm guessing I should have posted my reasoning on the talk page as well, but that seemed superfluous at the time.

907:

Sorry for bothering you so frequently lately - just FYI, I started an essay with my advice for obtaining free images from notable people based on my experiences so far - it's currently in

3554:

In some cases the bot does not seem to be adding species to genus articles if the species already existed as an article, rather it just adds the species that it has contributed (example

3848: 2658:

Her picture was a TV screenshot. This is allowed, isn't it? I've read your "Was the image "fair-use replaceable"" thing and I don't see why this TV screenshot has been deleted. --

2880:

discourse, I do consider such actions to be generally dictatorial in character. I, on the other hand, am not dictating anything. I am expressing my concern for the discourse which

1839:

Actually it's not fair use. I highly doubt Commons will ever find those pictures to be non-free and delete them (at least not mine...some of the other ones on there look iffy). -

3640:? If you want, I can summarize it here. Many of the problems Polbot has caused are things it can fix. And it will be great to have at least a stub on every bird species! — 758:

the page had noted. Is there a way to change the verb tense if Polbot notices the "status = EX" in the taxobox? "was a species of..." and "was native/endemic to..." Thanks! --

1230:

Glad to hear the plant articles are going to the right place. That policy has been well established, unfortunately for animal species there is only a vague guideline at the

547:

you're adding, so let me know when you get around to them, so I can watch the list. If you can give me some of the Asteraceae names, or even one, I can find the rest.

2800:

Hi Quadell. I undid the removal of the so-called "chit chat" on this page. I believe that it is relevant to the process you are undertaking. I hope you agree. Thanks,

2221:

the only person with a problem with it. Before I put it back however, I will see if I can manage to snag a photo as I am traveling on Northwest in a couple of days.--

1675:

Well what I meant was "maybe he had a reason to leave the rest of them in". Sometimes my wording doesn't match what I mean. I'm working on trying to write clearer :) -

1523: 2313:

Sure thing -- I restored it. I honestly don't remember why I deleted it, but I figure it must have seemed like a good idea at the time. (It was 2 years ago, which in

2781:

I'm afraid we cannot accept promotional photographs of living people, unless those images were explicitly released by the copyright-holder under a free license. See

1171:

First of all I wasn't the one who uploaded the image, I was just wondering why it was deleted. Second, couldn't you have just asked the uploader to add the source?

3188:

property. As for the photograph of Parviz Shapour and Forough Farrokhzad: it dates from 1951 (or 1950), so that it has been public property for the past 30 years!

1108: 589: 3140: 997:). By the way, great job with those pages! Our total article count jumped several thousand pages in the past few days. 15,000 down, millions of species to go! -- 3560:). Also when ammedning the genus articles it overwrites everything previously there, which is problematic as we have been adding stuff to the articles (example 2699:

I don't have a list of runtimes, but I do have a list of species. There are over 10,000, and the list is growing. (It contains all species, not just birds.) –

863:. In other words, in the Merkin case, the product is the picture itself, rather than the object in the picture. Do you see that this might make a difference? 846:- which photo would you use in that article? The one there or one of the Merkin ones? And I also wanted to reply to your comment about other featured images: 461:

I don't think it matters. It will install the packages to you default Perl library folder (probably C:\perl\lib\), no matter where you call the commands from.

1556:

One of the primary reasons for the template is to make other editors on the article aware of the criteria, and encourage them to do the cleanup themselves.

853: 2504: 924: 3577: 2563: 2777:

i don't quite understand the proper way to upload a promotional photograph, and i would appreciate any help you can provide in replacing this image.

2296: 3828:. The second time, it was deleted for being released only under a non-commercial license. (Knowledge (XXG) can only use images if they are free for 3347: 3766:

excuse me but I have permission from Bryten Goss's mother to use these pictures..I dont understand why they are geting deleted...kind of annoying!

3430:

would be in a ridiculous number of categories.) The "fauna of Solomon Islands" bit was a mistake -- I've changed it to add "the" in future entries.

818: 801: 3587:

As for overwriting changes, you're right, that shouldn't happen. I'm looking through the code now. I'll stop that from happening. All the best, –

2300: 1024: 2977:

Is this what we've come to - complaining about the method and/or rate at which long-established valuable contributors archive their talk pages?

1462:

I'll think about what you've said. At your request, I have copied information from the image description page to the talk page. All the best, –

970:

Thanks. I should have known that...but the picture was uploaded by me like long time ago, when my knowledge of fair use was very limited. Best.

318:

I'm on Vista. I have installed WWW::Mechanize . What other packages will I need to install, and what is the commands for cmd to install them?

3389: 3385: 1820:, which says the game ". . .originated in China several thousand years ago". That's probably where I got the factoid. Don't know if that's a 1854: 624:

Okay, I protected it. You have to be logged in, and have an account that has existed for several days, before you can edit your page now. –

3472: 2090: 859:. The key difference is that those pictures are advertising something that they want the viewer to go out and buy, as opposed to selling 3793:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 3637: 1901:(edit conflict) Yeah, just remove the tag. (Good catch -- it's easy to miss that someone added a source and didn't remove the nsd tag.) 1878:

Hmm, not to butt in but that seems like an incomplete source. I doubt Amazon holds the copyright to that. I would probably tag it with

2709: 1527: 236:

Got my script written, but I can't launch it :-(. I get the following message in my command prompt when I tried to launch the script.

2815:

I had already read your comments, and I archived them. They are still visible in the archive. Please don't reformat my talk page. –

3048:. If that page needs to be archived, I promise to call it "banter", "persiflage", or "jibber-jabber" - but never "chit-chat". ;) – 585: 345:

I'm not 100% sure, but I think the following packages ought to do it. Just run the following lines in order from the command line.

3342:

Hi, a few thoughts on Polbot's recent work. Would it be possible to have it automatically add the appropriate subcategories from

2450:

There will still be a lot to do, but the silly little thrill of creating a page will be gone. Not to mention it'll be the end of

1711: 1416: 1365: 1296:

this trophy is photographed. Because of this, the image still counts as replaceable, and our policies won't let us use the image.

1595: 2469:

Significant expansion of a small stub qualifies for DYK -- a significant human expansion of these stubs would qualify surely.

2956:

complain about using a light-hearted term, or archiving quickly? Isn't there enough negativity on Knowledge (XXG) already? –

2463: 2384: 2352:

I'm a little uneasy with your bot that is creating bird articles. What taxonomy is it using? It created a genus article for

808: 3671:

genera that haven't been created yet have a species list at the family article. For instance, if Polbot decides to create

2390:

I certainly understand. Polbot's getting all her information from the IUCN, which sometimes uses outdated taxonomies. (See

223:, it gets the next line from the text file. (It keeps the carriage return at the end of the line, too.) Hope this helps. – 3720: 3515: 3471:

Hi, I need some help in uploading images. I scanned a print and I got the autorization from the author to use it on wiki.

3109:. The message was polite, but he demonstrated that he doesn't feel comfortable in discussing the matter directly with me. 1490: 665: 482: 3694:

Another, maybe better possibility might be to search Knowledge (XXG) for articles containing "genus = <genus name: -->

3155:

I replied on your talk page, his talk page, the image talk page, the IFD entry. . . basically everywhere but here. :-) –

3143:, from the same user above, seems to suffer from the same problem as the one discussed. Would you take a look? Thanks. -- 659: 2473: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 113: 108: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 3786: 3265:

Take a photo of him myself to make it a free image? That photo WAS taken by me, I don't get how you makes it free. --

1376: 1300: 3591: 3572: 2724: 2584: 2558: 2499: 2486: 2476: 2458: 2425: 2379: 2375:? We're going to need to go through and check all the new articles to try and fit them in to our organisation scheme. 847: 3832:

to reuse, even commercially.) Now these problems have been fixed, so it shouldn't get deleted again. All the best, –

817:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at 3853: 1144: 3633:

occurs regularly in Grand Fenwick, Lower Slobbovia, and Ruritania. It has wandered to Upper Slobbovia and Zembla."

3106: 727: 655: 38: 856: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3343: 2291: 2056: 850: 813: 908: 3486: 2750: 2600: 2577: 2365: 2255: 2086: 1243:, they should be used for article titles, except for plant articles. Scientific names should be used otherwise. 1082: 3392:. I think most countries are somewhat subdivided, is it possible to improve the tightness of the categories? 3102: 3790: 3234: 3061: 3025: 2981: 2843: 2470: 2266: 2120: 1892: 1792:

page, so I figured instead of waiting for it to resolve itself, or deleting it, I’d go right to the source.

1772: 1749: 1560: 1538: 931: 915: 616: 165: 157:, which was about as far away from it as I could get. (But then I came off my break after getting pics from 3503: 2078: 1634:

Ooh, good point. Sorry, I'll make sure to fix that. (That should be the only error like that I've made.) –

1583: 3729: 3569: 3381: 2555: 2496: 2455: 2376: 1817: 1807: 491: 436: 399: 324: 277: 242: 191: 3273: 3021:

easy to restart a conversation with a specific concern - I still believe the complaint is a trivial one.

2885:

paranoid would look in the archive. I think this covers the other editors concern. Thanks for your time.

2782: 2082: 181:? I want the bot to write/append from a txt file instead of appending the same thing (which is currently 3663:

You know what the bot can do. "What links here" certainly might help, as both family and species pages

3231: 3058: 3022: 2978: 2840: 2263: 2117: 1934: 1889: 1858: 1557: 1535: 1248:

I emphasised the bit most people overlook. My opinion is that articles, such as those on frog sp. (like

928: 912: 737: 697: 682: 613: 596:, so that you can add similar information to any album covers you upload in the future. All the best, – 162: 3629:

Of course, there will be problems where the IUCN taxonomy differs from that already in Knowledge (XXG).

153:

thanks for the picture contrib. Yesterday, since I needed a break from porn, I expanded the article on

3654:

to be anthropomorphized -- she thinks it's a demeaning comparison -- but I do it just to annoy her. –

3495:

3: In the scroll down tag there is no choice for my case, or not? I wouldn't know which one to choose.

2259: 3857: 3614: 3427: 2909: 2908:

Fred, what about Quadell's archiving method is opaque? The link is right at the top of his page. --

2327: 2304: 2251: 2231:

Since it is possible to replace the non-free photo, we can't use it. I hope you get a great photo! –

2165: 1025:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Biography#Sortkey and birth/death categories standardization project

874: 717: 671: 485:

when I try to enter in the above into cmd.exe. Any ideas? You can delete the image after you see it.

3199:, as is well-known, almost 30 years ago a revolution took place in Iran, whereby some people became 1799:

AD. Do you have any basis or reference for this claim? I know Chinese culture hella old school, but

1587: 3602: 3444: 3399: 3293:

Then you can reupload the image, but be sure to state that you took the photo yourself, and use an

1693:

It's ok. I corrected myself on the talk page. I do agree, my original wording did sound dreadful. -

1591: 1531: 1486: 1239:

In cases where there is a formal common name (e.g. birds), or when common names are well-known and

843: 732: 722: 593: 570:

I've just realised that you deleted a image that I uploaded form the album-article Ice Pickin from

1347: 1172: 1149: 651: 3700: 3641: 3409: 3326: 3301: 2046: 1840: 1768: 1745: 1715: 1694: 1676: 1656: 1576: 998: 994: 759: 712: 575: 3434: 3419: 1948: 1380: 2421:

As for the foreign names problem, I think I'll be able to fix that. Thanks for the feedback! –

650:

Greetings! I hope you don't mind if I comment. Though you are the photographer of the image,

3794: 3678: 3511: 3287: 3266: 3224: 2607: 2440: 2409: 2357: 2262:

suddenly showed up. Maybe I should say "screw Knowledge (XXG)" and start my own website. :) -

2002:

Repeated IP sock edits out of 141.nnn.nnn.nnn. I have requested the page be semi-protected at

1974: 1918: 1869: 1516: 47: 17: 3250: 2670: 2633:

oversized? (Extra credit for same in the form of actual proposal for suitable new 'types.)

2492: 2372: 2003: 1795:

The current wording says pai kau is “thousands of years old,” which would put it at at least

1430: 1315: 3213: 3094: 3045: 2887: 2827: 2802: 2518: 1258: 1202: 1044: 693: 3825: 3691:, which is a subfamily, so that might require manual intervention to tell it where to look. 3294: 2731: 2491:

If you say so. But I agree that I would like a scheme of all bot created bird articles for

2404:

easier for a bot to do than a human. If you were to say that, for instance, all species in

2136: 1358: 1354: 1231: 941: 3170: 3145: 3130: 2990: 2931: 2736: 2690: 2535: 1118:

for deletion. As the page creator, you may wish to particpate in the deletion discussions

1029: 878: 864: 3621:), which was missing from the genus article. I've added the African Pygmy Falcon to the 1821: 3384:

and maybe you've changed that. For the Solomon Islands, though, the correct category is

3223:

Hey, why was my Travis Randell image deleted? I really want a image for the article. --

3245:

The image was deleted because it was not a free image. Knowledge (XXG) is a completely

3069: 3036: 2483: 2413: 2391: 2353: 2161: 1741: 1253: 571: 551: 154: 146: 2768: 1952: 3683: 3529: 3406: 2432: 2405: 2341:

Hi. Why did you remove the image of the Temple of Maitreya? Gantuya Eng, 26 July 2007

2314: 2222: 2113: 1938: 1621: 1286: 1159: 1125: 989: 890: 3450:, but it's actually easier for me to write it out longhand, so that's what I do. :-) 3183:

On two photographs: that of Taqizadeh and that of Parviz Shapour + Forough Farrokzad

1116:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Successful requests for permission

707:

I've also fixed the following from the last 50 edits - I suspect there will be more:

217:

open(MYINPUTFILE, "<special_message.txt"); $ text = $ text . <MYINPUTFILE: -->

3870: 3867: 3860: 3836: 3833: 3797: 3774: 3771: 3755: 3752: 3745: 3703: 3658: 3655: 3644: 3588: 3543: 3540: 3507: 3457: 3454: 3412: 3372: 3329: 3311: 3308: 3280: 3277: 3257: 3254: 3246: 3236: 3174: 3159: 3156: 3149: 3134: 3072: 3063: 3052: 3049: 3039: 3027: 3015: 3012: 2993: 2983: 2960: 2957: 2934: 2912: 2894: 2860: 2857: 2845: 2834: 2819: 2816: 2809: 2789: 2786: 2757: 2754: 2739: 2715: 2703: 2700: 2693: 2677: 2674: 2662: 2659: 2647: 2644: 2637: 2621: 2618: 2611: 2604: 2581: 2548: 2545: 2538: 2525: 2439:) a single page is created and the genus redirects to the species (as was done for 2422: 2330: 2321: 2318: 2307: 2279: 2276: 2268: 2235: 2232: 2225: 2201: 2198: 2168: 2143: 2140: 2122: 2103: 2100: 2063: 2060: 2049: 2032: 2019: 2016: 2009: 1990: 1987: 1981: 1968: 1959: 1956: 1941: 1921: 1915: 1909: 1906: 1894: 1882: 1872: 1866: 1843: 1828: 1825: 1810: 1775: 1762: 1759: 1752: 1727: 1724: 1718: 1697: 1688: 1685: 1679: 1670: 1667: 1659: 1638: 1635: 1628: 1609: 1606: 1562: 1551: 1548: 1540: 1501: 1498: 1480: 1466: 1463: 1449: 1387: 1384: 1340: 1307: 1304: 1289: 1265: 1220: 1217: 1209: 1184: 1181: 1175: 1166: 1163: 1152: 1132: 1101: 1098: 1091: 1071: 1062: 1059: 1052: 1032: 1012: 1009: 1001: 974: 965: 962: 954: 933: 917: 897: 881: 867: 825: 773: 770: 762: 751: 748: 701: 674: 644: 628: 625: 618: 600: 597: 578: 554: 529: 526: 507: 468: 465: 452: 424: 421: 415: 376: 373: 367: 364: 340: 313: 310: 293: 258: 227: 224: 207: 167: 2356:

with one species, but there should be three according to the taxonomy we use. The

3688: 3556: 3369: 2712: 2436: 2029: 2006: 1978: 1965: 1865:

given. Should I just remove the tag and carry on deleting other images? Thanks.

1645: 1625: 1158:

It's probably not a free image. To be considered "free", an image either has to

1068: 1049: 641: 300:

probably run the following line at the command prompt to install WWW::Mechanize.

158: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2371:

It isn't that I don't appreciate the effort but perhaps some consultation with

790: 550:

Overall the articles look great and it's an excellent contribution, thank you.

3815: 3610: 2190: 1477: 1446: 1337: 971: 951: 822: 560: 3453:

If anyone can think of any other possible improvement, please let me know. –

1888:. That's not a perfect tag for this situation but I don't know a better one. 213:

Greetings. If I understand you correctly, you want to do something like this:

3673: 3562: 2634: 2299:

for where this page is listed, now red-linked. This comes up as a result of

1624:, not Fauna of Ecuador, but Flora of Ecuador, please. By any means, thanks. 747:

I've fixed it now, but if the problem crops up again, please let me know. –

658:.) That said, if you feel that the use of the image is justified under our 3125:: Thanks for your other valuable voluntary interventions in my talk page! 1406:

would have been a benefit to further discussion or debate at IfD. Oh well.

873:

A better comparison might be the images used to illustrate the articles in

2720:

That will work where a WikiProject talk page has been added (in this case

785: 688:

You may want to have a look at how Polbot constructs some sentences - see

3423: 2247: 1375:

If you feel the image was deleted incorrectly, you can list the image at

1369: 2989:

Fred's point about archived discussion being less visible is well made.

2708:

I don't know if that can help but I have been using this log for plants

1789: 3274:

http://www.lportepilot.ca/newsnet/papers/pilot/HB%20Travis%20Moose.JPG

3168:

And I, for one, re-replied on my own talk page to avoid attention. --

2361: 2400:

If you'd like me to rearrange the structure of various taxa, that's

3057:

Yes, please let's not offend anyone by calling it "chit-chat" :) -

2872: 2454:

s for our project when we don't have any more articles to create.

584:

The image was deleted because it did not have a copyright tag. See

1476:

Okey doke. Thanks for your help and for lending an ear. Cheers,

1684:

I think I took your statement the wrong way. No problems then. –

1226:{{IUCN2006 |assessors= |year= |id= |title= |downloaded= }} 3230:

No offense, but did you see the notice at the top of this page?

839:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Michele Merkin 1.jpg

781:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Michele Merkin 1.jpg

3613:

with just that species. However, there's another species, the

3115:: The old conversation he mentions in his message can be found 2364:. It also has foreign names in bold in the first line (example 1788:

Hey, what’s up, fam. I see there’s currently a uglyin’ up the

1530:. I proposed it as a standard Knowledge (XXG) cleanup template 1348:

http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/16/11/8/1/pwsup1%5F11%2D03

1346:

I won't restore the image, but you can find that same image at

430:

Also, what should my directory be? (like c:\FOLDERDIRECTORY ).

2839:

Archiving of the talk page is a common and accepted practice.

1428:

I just have one last request: the description page for image,

25: 1803:, no records of pai kau stretch that far. Take it easy, folks 789: 3824:

Greetings. The first time, it was deleted for not having a

2772: 2416:, that wouldn't be too hard for me to do. Just let me know. 2028:

You are insanely speedy. Thanks for your prompt attention.

1816:

I don't know if it's true, bro, but it is mentioned in the

3721:

You seem to be removing deleted images from articles, ect.

2771:

and then removed the link to said image from the article

2368:) - only commonly used English names should be this way. 178: 52:

This archive page covers comments 1451-1500, from roughly

3638:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds#Polbot_and_the_aftermath

2395:

outdated taxonomic info is better than no article at all.

1796: 3249:

encyclopedia, and we can only use non-free images under

1383:

even with those you disagree with. It's a rare trait. –

3567: 3116: 3098: 2301:

this post at Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for deletion

1652: 1485:

PS. If you wanna take a gander at the new image, it's

689: 3499:

If you can send me in the right direction .... thanks

3479:

1: Is there a format for the description of the image?

2769:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Velmaslaundry170x170.jpg

1855:

Category:Images with unknown source as of 15 July 2007

1299:

If you still disagree, you can bring the issue up at

1285:

restore the image. I would be greatly appreciative.

3068:Oh, it's better than what I've called it at times. 2643:

Yes, that's a good idea. Thanks for the feedback! –

1964:

You guys are doing good. Thanks. It is appreciated.

2897:

This comment is current. 19:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

1364:As to your last point, the template that was used, 3475:But how do I set up the description and licence? 1109:Knowledge (XXG):Successful requests for permission 950:What's the reason that this image is replaceable? 3093:Hi, Quadell. Could you try to communication with 1714:? The page history contains offensive comments. - 268:failed--compilation aborted at upload.pl line 6. 3816:http://en.wikipedia.org/John_Robb_%28musician%29 2254:) and one from a prominent minister in England ( 1528:User:Quadell/Pages with too many non-free images 1524:Category:Articles with improper non-free content 923:OK, I actually pretty much finished it, it's at 3770:Please see the link at the top of this page. – 3418:Thanks for the feedback, all of you! I add the 3141:Image:Parviz-Shapour-and-Forough-Farrokhzad.jpg 2360:is a full species in its page but isn't on the 1744:, which I made and uploaded, and I will PD it. 1620:Hi Quadell, sorry, but there is errors like at 3681:. If it (I'm being polite) decides to create 2074:Quadell, you have a foot fetish.. I can tell. 769:Good point. That is confusing. I'll fix it. – 372:Sorry, use doublequotes in the lines above. – 2045:How do you autogenerate an article? And why? 8: 2617:Thanks for notifying me. I replied there. – 2297:Knowledge (XXG):Archived delete debates/2003 363:Perlwikipedia to run. Cross your fingers! – 3195:other facts have to be taken into account. 2730:), and where a log has been set up for the 2246:Got some photos from scientists (including 819:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates 222:Each time you refer to <MYINPUTFILE: --> 3636:Have you been following the discussion at 3388:, and there is in fact a tighter category 1379:. On a personal note, thank you for being 925:User:Videmus Omnia/Requesting free content 887:So when do we see it on the Main Page? -- 1429: 1314: 940: 3426:to a country. (Otherwise a species like 1973:Please note that Kay is back editing as 1853:Hi, I'm deleting images in the category 391:perl -MCPAN -e "install HTTP::Response" 304:perl -MCPAN -e 'install WWW::Mechanize' 2317:is before I was born.) All the best, – 2055:How? Perl, actually. The sourcecode is 1497:Superior to the original. Great job! – 1097:I just fixed that. :) Thanks though! – 1077:Pleas ecorrect it is Category:Fauna of 3473:Image:Mantova_Zacche_Porta_Cerese.jpg 2290:Hey Quadell. A while back you deleted 1526:, which I created as a substitute for 1493:). Comments and suggestions welcome. 588:for more info. (It also didn't have a 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3390:Category:Birds of the Solomon Islands 3386:Category:Fauna of the Solomon Islands 2544:Where would you like it? It's big. – 2303:. Can you restore the page? Thanks.-- 1857:, and I'm wondering what to do about 7: 3723:Why don't you get a bot to do that? 3667:link to the genus name. For birds, 586:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 1396:Thanks for the link. That'll help. 3687:, though, it will have to look at 3325:) about Canadian copyright law. — 2773:http://en.wikipedia.org/The_Velmas 2749:Notice: I've started this list at 2580:. I'll be adding to it as I go. – 2193:article is supposed to be about a 24: 3811:and its got copyright clearence! 3550:Polbot genus articles fix needed. 3539:you select. I hope this helps! – 3405:or one of the related templates? 1712:Image:Michael Jackson 1984(2).jpg 1415:The template you point to above, 670:and add a fair use rationale. -- 464:I'm going to bed now. G'night. – 3843:Image delete-ability appreciated 3803:why are you deleting my picture? 3650:solution for that. Also, Polbot 1417:Template:Di-replaceable fair use 29: 3847:Hiya. Using your nomination of 3440:Finally, I thought about using 3395:Finally, is it possible to use 1824:or not though. All the best, – 1575:Why did you delete the logo of 1377:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion Review 1301:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion Review 1145:Image:RadioDisneyIkea CMC 0.jpg 3214:--BF 00:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 2099:Thanks for letting me know. – 1148:I thought it was a free image. 1: 3677:, there's a complete list at 2116:article could use some work. 1489:(with an alternate rendering 183:Experimenting a little bit... 3807:I took the picture muyslef! 3191:Aside from the above facts, 1038:Floras by country categories 3482:2: I wanted to use the tag 3380:Actually, I just checked a 3307:, and it should be fine. – 2292:Talk:Easter Bradford/delete 2189:And for the last time, the 1142:Why was this image deleted? 743:Thanks for finding this. I 173:Since your on right now :-) 3887: 3785:An editor has asked for a 3535:and say who the artist is. 3492:but where should I put it? 3272:You took this photograph? 2216:World Business Class Photo 1805: 1180:The uploader was asked. – 814:Image:Michele Merkin 1.jpg 802:Featured picture candidate 728:Colostethus pseudopalmatus 3871:03:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 3861:13:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3837:15:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3798:05:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3775:15:37, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3756:00:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3746:00:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3704:03:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3659:01:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3645:01:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3592:00:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3578:23:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3544:20:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3458:20:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3422:only when the species is 3413:19:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3373:19:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3366:Category:Flora by country 3362:Category:Fauna by country 3358:Category:Biota by country 3344:Category:Biota by country 3330:03:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 3312:20:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3281:19:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3258:14:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3237:14:14, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3175:03:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3160:00:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3150:21:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 3135:21:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 3101:on my talk page about an 3073:22:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 3064:21:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 3053:21:53, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 3040:21:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 3028:21:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 3016:22:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2994:21:30, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2984:21:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2961:21:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2935:21:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2913:19:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2895:19:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2861:18:30, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2846:18:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2835:18:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2820:18:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2810:17:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2790:16:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2783:Knowledge (XXG):Copyright 2763:the velmas image deletion 2758:13:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 2740:15:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2716:13:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2704:13:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2694:13:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2684:Lists and details of runs 2678:11:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2671:non-free content criteria 2663:11:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2648:11:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2638:07:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2622:11:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2612:05:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2585:13:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 2564:01:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 2549:00:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 2539:21:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2526:12:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2505:05:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2487:05:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2477:05:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2464:03:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2426:03:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2385:02:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2331:03:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2322:03:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2308:02:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2280:03:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2269:01:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2236:02:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2226:00:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2202:23:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2169:23:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2144:23:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2135:Sorry, I can't help you. 2123:23:26, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2104:23:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2064:22:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2050:22:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2041:Re Polbot: Autogeneration 2033:12:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 2020:12:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 2010:12:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 1991:17:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 1982:17:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 1969:23:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1960:23:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1942:21:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1937:. Game without an end. -- 1922:20:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1914:Thanks, both of you. :-) 1910:20:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1895:20:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1873:20:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1861:. It seems that a source 1844:19:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1829:18:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1811:18:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1776:16:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1763:15:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1753:15:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1728:14:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1719:14:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1710:Incidentally, can you i8 1698:14:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1689:14:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1680:14:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1671:14:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1660:14:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1639:11:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1629:11:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1610:11:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1571:Tensoku Ryu Image deleted 1563:15:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1552:11:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1541:06:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1534:, we'll see how it goes. 1502:02:56, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 1481:02:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 1467:23:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1450:20:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1388:11:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1341:05:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1308:02:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1290:02:33, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1266:17:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1221:02:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1210:02:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1185:21:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1176:19:01, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1167:19:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1153:19:01, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1133:18:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1102:16:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1092:16:37, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1072:16:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1063:16:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1053:15:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1033:15:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1013:12:41, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1002:12:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 975:19:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 966:18:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 955:18:11, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 934:22:14, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 918:07:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 898:18:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 882:03:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 868:03:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 826:03:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 774:12:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 763:12:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 752:23:05, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 702:19:05, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 675:01:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 668:|Yugoslav People's Army}} 645:01:15, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 629:23:04, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 619:18:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 601:15:07, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 579:06:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 555:05:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 530:23:03, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 508:18:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 481:Okay, I tried, and I get 469:04:37, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 453:04:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 425:04:30, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 416:04:28, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 377:04:24, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 368:04:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 341:04:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 314:04:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 294:04:01, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 259:04:01, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 228:03:37, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 208:03:25, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 168:02:08, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3251:a strict set of criteria 2785:for more information. – 2751:User:Polbot/taxa listing 2578:User:Polbot/taxa listing 1114:Hi Quadell. I nominated 656:Commons:Derivative works 635:Again Deleting my images 3791:Image:AlexPorusCoin.JPG 3781:Image:AlexPorusCoin.JPG 3338:Polbot biology articles 2366:Prince Ruspoli's Turaco 2286:Deleted deletion debate 1835:Oscar photos on Commons 1605:image. All the best, – 1372:, who tagged the image. 1272:GMO Championship Trophy 660:non-free content policy 3866:I'll comment there. – 3107:nominated for deletion 2576:I started the list at 1849:Advice requested again 1651:I'm sure you remember 1245: 1058:Okay, I added this. – 794: 662:, you may tag it with 563:image in album article 1508:New template/category 1237: 793: 738:Colostethus sumtuosus 683:Colostethus thorntoni 266:C:\perlwikipedia: --> 42:of past discussions. 3615:African Pygmy Falcon 3428:African Pied Wagtail 3089:Intervention request 2252:Human Genome Project 1951:is quicker than his 1773:Talk to Andy Mabbett 1750:Talk to Andy Mabbett 1723:Sure thing. Done. – 1432:File:Calabi-Yau.jpeg 1317:File:Calabi-Yau.jpeg 1067:Thank you very much. 903:Looking for feedback 875:Category:Photographs 834:Featured pics debate 807:Your nomination for 718:Colostethus ramirezi 666:Non-free fair use in 594:Image:Ice Pickin.jpg 3607:Polihierax insignis 3603:White-rumped Falcon 3382:recent contribution 3295:image copyright tag 1986:Thanks, got him. – 1935:Image:SV_Dynamo.png 1818:first external link 844:Glamour photography 733:Colostethus ornatus 723:Colostethus pinguis 3849:Warpath-boxart.jpg 3695:" and "species =". 2725:WikiProject Plants 2673:. All the best, – 2628:Polbot Function #6 2471:Christopher Parham 1357:(or, more likely, 1081:United States!!!!! 1008:be an easy fix. – 983:Did Polbot hiccup? 943:File:RJGalindo.jpg 861:the picture itself 795: 713:Colostethus ramosi 218:; close(outfile); 3679:Ovenbird (family) 3520: 3506:comment added by 3201:persona non grata 2871:I don't consider 2609: 2599:Per this thread: 2441:Wedge-tailed Jery 2410:Procellariiformes 2358:Madagascar Hoopoe 2095: 2081:comment added by 1802: 1600: 1586:comment added by 1281:prompt response. 1241:reasonably unique 831: 830: 804:has been promoted 700: 64: 63: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Quadell 3878: 3852:on the deletion 3744: 3742: 3739: 3735: 3732: 3727: 3619:P. semitorquatus 3575: 3570:Sabine's Sunbird 3534: 3528: 3519: 3500: 3491: 3485: 3449: 3443: 3404: 3398: 3306: 3300: 3095:User:BehnamFarid 3046:User talk:Polbot 2893: 2833: 2808: 2767:hi, you deleted 2729: 2723: 2608: 2561: 2556:Sabine's Sunbird 2524: 2502: 2497:Sabine's Sunbird 2461: 2456:Sabine's Sunbird 2452:Did you know...? 2382: 2377:Sabine's Sunbird 2112:By the way, the 2094: 2075: 1887: 1881: 1800: 1740:Please undelete 1599: 1580: 1521: 1515: 1435: 1433: 1320: 1318: 1264: 1208: 1131: 1128: 1089: 1045:Dalbergia bojeri 1023:The response at 946: 944: 896: 893: 809:featured picture 786: 696: 669: 506: 504: 501: 497: 494: 489: 451: 449: 446: 442: 439: 434: 414: 412: 409: 405: 402: 397: 339: 337: 334: 330: 327: 322: 292: 290: 287: 283: 280: 275: 257: 255: 252: 248: 245: 240: 206: 204: 201: 197: 194: 189: 177:Can you look at 59: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3886: 3885: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3845: 3805: 3787:deletion review 3783: 3764: 3740: 3737: 3733: 3730: 3725: 3724: 3718: 3573: 3552: 3532: 3526: 3501: 3489: 3487:Non-free 2D art 3483: 3469: 3447: 3441: 3402: 3396: 3356:I believe that 3340: 3304: 3298: 3286:Yes, I did. -- 3221: 3185: 3091: 2891: 2886: 2831: 2826: 2806: 2801: 2798: 2765: 2727: 2721: 2686: 2656: 2654:Holly Hallstrom 2630: 2597: 2559: 2522: 2517: 2500: 2459: 2380: 2350: 2328:Fuhghettaboutit 2305:Fuhghettaboutit 2288: 2244: 2242:Interesting day 2218: 2139:and all. ;-) – 2076: 2072: 2043: 1932: 1885: 1879: 1851: 1837: 1822:reliable source 1786: 1742:Image:Names.jpg 1738: 1736:Image:Names.jpg 1649: 1618: 1581: 1573: 1519: 1513: 1510: 1431: 1322: 1316: 1274: 1262: 1257: 1227: 1206: 1201: 1197: 1140: 1126: 1123: 1112: 1086:♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ 1083: 1040: 1021: 985: 948: 942: 905: 891: 888: 836: 806: 784: 686: 663: 637: 609: 565: 544: 502: 499: 495: 492: 487: 486: 447: 444: 440: 437: 432: 431: 410: 407: 403: 400: 395: 394: 392: 385:So...(example): 355: 335: 332: 328: 325: 320: 319: 305: 288: 285: 281: 278: 273: 272: 269: 253: 250: 246: 243: 238: 237: 219: 202: 199: 195: 192: 187: 186: 175: 150: 143: 57: 53: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3884: 3882: 3874: 3873: 3844: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3820: 3814: 3810: 3804: 3801: 3782: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3763: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3717: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3696: 3692: 3634: 3630: 3627: 3609:) and created 3595: 3594: 3585: 3551: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3536: 3497: 3496: 3493: 3480: 3468: 3467:Help on images 3465: 3463: 3461: 3460: 3451: 3438: 3431: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3339: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3315: 3314: 3284: 3283: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3240: 3239: 3220: 3217: 3184: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3163: 3162: 3090: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3018: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2889: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2829: 2822: 2804: 2797: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2764: 2761: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2685: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2655: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2629: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2596: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2520: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2479: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2435:) in a genus ( 2418: 2417: 2414:Pelecaniformes 2397: 2396: 2354:Corythaixoides 2349: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2287: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2260:these pictures 2243: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2217: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2162:Foot fetishism 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2107: 2106: 2083:76.209.207.143 2071: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2042: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2023: 2022: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1902: 1898: 1897: 1850: 1847: 1836: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1737: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1648: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1617: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1572: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1509: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1445:Thanks again, 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1391: 1390: 1373: 1362: 1350: 1321: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1297: 1273: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1260: 1254:Litoria moorei 1236: 1235: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1204: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1136: 1111: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1075: 1074: 1065: 1039: 1036: 1020: 1017: 1016: 1015: 984: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 947: 938: 937: 936: 904: 901: 885: 884: 835: 832: 829: 828: 798: 796: 783: 778: 777: 776: 766: 765: 741: 740: 735: 730: 725: 720: 715: 709: 708: 685: 679: 678: 677: 636: 633: 632: 631: 608: 605: 604: 603: 572:Albert Collins 564: 558: 543: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 474: 473: 472: 471: 462: 456: 455: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 303: 302: 301: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 231: 230: 216: 215: 214: 174: 171: 155:Philip Serrell 149: 147:Michele Merkin 144: 142: 141: 136: 131: 126: 121: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 81: 76: 71: 65: 62: 61: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3883: 3872: 3869: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3859: 3855: 3850: 3842: 3838: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3826:copyright tag 3823: 3822: 3821: 3818: 3817: 3812: 3808: 3802: 3800: 3799: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3780: 3776: 3773: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3761: 3757: 3754: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3743: 3736: 3722: 3715: 3705: 3702: 3701:JerryFriedman 3697: 3693: 3690: 3686: 3685: 3684:Xiphorhynchus 3680: 3676: 3675: 3670: 3666: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3657: 3653: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3643: 3642:JerryFriedman 3639: 3635: 3631: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3593: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3576: 3571: 3568: 3565: 3564: 3559: 3558: 3549: 3545: 3542: 3537: 3531: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3494: 3488: 3481: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3474: 3466: 3464: 3459: 3456: 3452: 3446: 3439: 3436: 3432: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3411: 3408: 3401: 3393: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3374: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3349: 3345: 3337: 3331: 3328: 3327:JerryFriedman 3324: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3313: 3310: 3303: 3296: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3282: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3259: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3238: 3235: 3233: 3232:Videmus Omnia 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3219:Randell Image 3218: 3216: 3215: 3209: 3207: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3189: 3182: 3176: 3173: 3172: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3161: 3158: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3148: 3147: 3142: 3137: 3136: 3133: 3132: 3126: 3124: 3120: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3088: 3074: 3071: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3062: 3060: 3059:Videmus Omnia 3056: 3055: 3054: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3038: 3033: 3029: 3026: 3024: 3023:Videmus Omnia 3019: 3017: 3014: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2995: 2992: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2982: 2980: 2979:Videmus Omnia 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2962: 2959: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2936: 2933: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2914: 2911: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2896: 2892: 2883: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2862: 2859: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2847: 2844: 2842: 2841:Videmus Omnia 2838: 2837: 2836: 2832: 2823: 2821: 2818: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2807: 2795: 2791: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2775: 2774: 2770: 2762: 2760: 2759: 2756: 2752: 2741: 2738: 2733: 2726: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2714: 2710: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2692: 2683: 2679: 2676: 2672: 2669:of our first 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2661: 2653: 2649: 2646: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2636: 2627: 2623: 2620: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2610: 2606: 2601: 2594: 2586: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2565: 2562: 2557: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2547: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2537: 2527: 2523: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2506: 2503: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2485: 2480: 2478: 2475: 2472: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2462: 2457: 2453: 2443:for example). 2442: 2438: 2434: 2433:Chestnut Rail 2429: 2428: 2427: 2424: 2420: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2406:Phaethontidae 2403: 2399: 2398: 2393: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2383: 2378: 2374: 2369: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2347: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2332: 2329: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2320: 2316: 2315:Internet time 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2293: 2285: 2281: 2278: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2267: 2265: 2264:Videmus Omnia 2261: 2257: 2256:David Jackman 2253: 2249: 2241: 2237: 2234: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2224: 2215: 2203: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2170: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2145: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2124: 2121: 2119: 2118:Videmus Omnia 2115: 2114:Elmer Batters 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2105: 2102: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2069: 2065: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2048: 2047:Verne Equinox 2040: 2034: 2031: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2021: 2018: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2008: 2005: 1992: 1989: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1967: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1940: 1936: 1929: 1923: 1920: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1908: 1903: 1900: 1899: 1896: 1893: 1891: 1890:Videmus Omnia 1884: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1871: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1848: 1846: 1845: 1842: 1834: 1830: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1809: 1804: 1798: 1793: 1791: 1783: 1777: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1761: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1735: 1729: 1726: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1708: 1699: 1696: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1687: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1678: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1669: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1658: 1654: 1647: 1644: 1640: 1637: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1627: 1623: 1622:Draba obovata 1615: 1611: 1608: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1578: 1570: 1564: 1561: 1559: 1558:Videmus Omnia 1555: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1536:Videmus Omnia 1533: 1529: 1525: 1518: 1507: 1503: 1500: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1492: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1468: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1451: 1448: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1434: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1389: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1360: 1356: 1351: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1339: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1319: 1313: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1288: 1282: 1278: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1244: 1242: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1222: 1219: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1207: 1195:Geocrinia sp. 1194: 1186: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1165: 1161: 1160:public domain 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1151: 1146: 1137: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1129: 1121: 1117: 1110: 1107: 1103: 1100: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1087: 1080: 1073: 1070: 1066: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1051: 1046: 1037: 1035: 1034: 1031: 1026: 1018: 1014: 1011: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1000: 996: 992: 991: 990:Draba obovata 982: 976: 973: 969: 968: 967: 964: 959: 958: 957: 956: 953: 945: 939: 935: 932: 930: 929:Videmus Omnia 926: 922: 921: 920: 919: 916: 914: 913:Videmus Omnia 910: 902: 900: 899: 895: 894: 883: 880: 876: 872: 871: 870: 869: 866: 862: 858: 855: 852: 849: 845: 840: 833: 827: 824: 820: 816: 815: 810: 805: 803: 797: 792: 788: 787: 782: 779: 775: 772: 768: 767: 764: 761: 756: 755: 754: 753: 750: 746: 739: 736: 734: 731: 729: 726: 724: 721: 719: 716: 714: 711: 710: 706: 705: 704: 703: 699: 695: 691: 684: 680: 676: 673: 667: 661: 657: 653: 652:Image:JNA.JPG 649: 648: 647: 646: 643: 634: 630: 627: 623: 622: 621: 620: 617: 615: 614:Videmus Omnia 606: 602: 599: 595: 591: 590:use rationale 587: 583: 582: 581: 580: 577: 576:Neburzaragoza 573: 568: 562: 559: 557: 556: 553: 548: 542:Kissing frogs 541: 531: 528: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 509: 505: 498: 484: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 470: 467: 463: 460: 459: 458: 457: 454: 450: 443: 429: 428: 427: 426: 423: 418: 417: 413: 406: 384: 378: 375: 371: 370: 369: 366: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 344: 343: 342: 338: 331: 317: 316: 315: 312: 307: 306: 298: 297: 296: 295: 291: 284: 260: 256: 249: 235: 234: 233: 232: 229: 226: 221: 220: 212: 211: 210: 209: 205: 198: 184: 180: 172: 170: 169: 166: 164: 163:Videmus Omnia 160: 156: 148: 145: 140: 137: 135: 132: 130: 127: 125: 122: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 66: 58:July 28, 2007 54:July 21, 2007 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3846: 3829: 3819: 3813: 3809: 3806: 3795:CaveatLector 3784: 3765: 3728: 3719: 3682: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3651: 3622: 3618: 3606: 3561: 3555: 3553: 3498: 3470: 3462: 3394: 3379: 3341: 3322: 3288:Chris Bulgin 3285: 3267:Chris Bulgin 3264: 3247:free content 3225:Chris Bulgin 3222: 3210: 3205: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3190: 3186: 3169: 3144: 3138: 3129: 3127: 3122: 3121: 3112: 3111: 3097:? He left a 3092: 3044:I'd suggest 2881: 2876: 2799: 2776: 2766: 2748: 2687: 2657: 2631: 2598: 2532: 2495:to work on. 2451: 2448: 2401: 2370: 2351: 2289: 2245: 2219: 2194: 2073: 2044: 2001: 1975:Blockerpower 1933: 1862: 1852: 1838: 1808:Wiki Wikardo 1794: 1787: 1769:Andy Mabbett 1746:Andy Mabbett 1739: 1650: 1619: 1616:Brassicaceae 1574: 1511: 1484: 1475: 1336:Thank you, 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1249: 1240: 1238: 1198: 1141: 1124: 1113: 1085: 1084: 1078: 1076: 1041: 1022: 1019:Just us two? 988: 986: 949: 906: 889: 886: 860: 837: 812: 799: 744: 742: 690:this version 687: 638: 610: 569: 566: 549: 545: 490: 483:this message 435: 419: 398: 393: 323: 276: 270: 241: 190: 182: 176: 151: 103: 43: 37: 3762:Bryten Goss 3689:Woodcreeper 3557:Eunymphicus 3502:—Preceding 2437:Eulabeornis 2412:instead of 2077:—Preceding 2070:Foot fetish 1767:Thank you. 1646:Tina Turner 1582:—Preceding 1577:Tensoku Ryu 1512:Please see 1138:Lalaine pic 694:Tivedshambo 271:Any ideas? 185:). Thanks! 179:this pastey 159:Mimi Miyagi 36:This is an 3858:EEMeltonIV 3623:Polihierax 3611:Polihierax 3435:birds of X 3420:fauna of X 3171:Abu badali 3146:Abu badali 3139:The image 3131:Abu badali 2991:Carcharoth 2932:Carcharoth 2910:Iamunknown 2737:Carcharoth 2691:Carcharoth 2536:Carcharoth 2408:belong in 2191:broom rape 2166:Iamunknown 1953:spraypaint 1030:Carcharoth 909:my sandbox 879:Carcharoth 865:Carcharoth 672:Iamunknown 561:Ice Pickin 104:Archive 30 3674:Sclerurus 3563:Eupodotis 3407:Rigadoun 3364:, besides 3360:includes 3302:GFDL-self 3070:KP Botany 3037:KP Botany 2484:KP Botany 2326:Thanks!-- 2258:). Then, 2250:from the 2164:. ;) -- 1653:this edit 1588:Mrsteveee 552:KP Botany 3516:contribs 3504:unsigned 3206:Secondly 2595:Your bot 2248:Jim Kent 2223:Golich17 2091:contribs 2079:unsigned 2015:Done. – 1939:Polarlys 1859:this one 1758:Done. – 1596:contribs 1584:unsigned 1517:non-free 1370:User:CBM 1287:DMighton 1250:Geocrina 1127:Jreferee 892:Jreferee 854:featured 811:status, 681:Polbot: 3868:Quadell 3834:Quadell 3772:Quadell 3753:Quadell 3656:Quadell 3589:Quadell 3541:Quadell 3508:AnnaZac 3455:Quadell 3433:As for 3424:endemic 3309:Quadell 3278:Quadell 3255:Quadell 3197:Firstly 3157:Quadell 3099:message 3050:Quadell 3013:Quadell 2958:Quadell 2858:Quadell 2817:Quadell 2787:Quadell 2755:Quadell 2701:Quadell 2675:Quadell 2660:Lyverbe 2645:Quadell 2619:Quadell 2605:Viridae 2582:Quadell 2546:Quadell 2493:WP:BIRD 2423:Quadell 2373:WP:BIRD 2319:Quadell 2277:Quadell 2233:Quadell 2199:Quadell 2141:Quadell 2101:Quadell 2061:Quadell 2017:Quadell 2004:WP:RFPP 1988:Quadell 1957:Quadell 1916:ElinorD 1907:Quadell 1867:ElinorD 1826:Quadell 1790:pai gow 1784:Pai Gao 1760:Quadell 1725:Quadell 1686:Quadell 1668:Quadell 1636:Quadell 1607:Quadell 1549:Quadell 1499:Quadell 1464:Quadell 1385:Quadell 1305:Quadell 1218:Quadell 1182:Quadell 1173:Ospinad 1164:Quadell 1150:Ospinad 1099:Quadell 1060:Quadell 1010:Quadell 963:Quadell 771:Quadell 749:Quadell 626:Quadell 598:Quadell 527:Quadell 466:Quadell 422:Quadell 420:Yes. – 374:Quadell 365:Quadell 311:Quadell 225:Quadell 39:archive 3830:anyone 3665:should 3410:(talk) 3370:Berton 2875:to be 2796:revert 2732:WP:1.0 2713:Berton 2474:(talk) 2431:(like 2362:Hoopoe 2348:Polbot 2195:plant! 2137:WP:COI 2030:Wiggy! 2007:Wiggy! 1979:Wiggy! 1966:Wiggy! 1919:(talk) 1870:(talk) 1626:Berton 1359:WP:CSD 1355:WP:IFD 1232:WP:TOL 1069:Berton 1050:Berton 999:Rkitko 857:images 760:Rkitko 698:(talk) 642:Zlatko 161:- :) 3652:hates 3626:from. 3297:like 3123:p.s.2 3103:image 2888:Fred 2828:Fred 2803:Fred 2519:Fred 1801:AFAIK 1478:Lunch 1447:Lunch 1381:civil 1338:Lunch 1259:Fred 1203:Fred 1120:here. 972:Wooyi 952:Wooyi 851:other 848:these 823:MER-C 800:Your 745:think 607:Favor 16:< 3854:here 3669:most 3574:talk 3530:GFDL 3512:talk 3445:IUCN 3400:IUCN 3348:here 3323:rien 3117:here 3113:p.s. 2873:this 2753:. – 2635:Alai 2560:talk 2501:talk 2460:talk 2402:much 2392:here 2381:talk 2087:talk 2057:here 1955:. – 1930:K.K. 1841:Nard 1716:Nard 1695:Nard 1677:Nard 1657:Nard 1592:talk 1532:here 1522:and 1491:here 1487:here 1366:here 995:talk 987:See 692:. – 567:Hi, 3789:of 3741:mit 3738:her 3716:Bot 3350:.) 3193:two 3119:. 2882:you 2160:Or 1949:mop 1947:My 1883:bsr 1655:. - 1122:-- 1079:the 503:mit 500:her 448:mit 445:her 411:mit 408:her 336:mit 333:her 289:mit 286:her 254:mit 251:her 203:mit 200:her 56:to 3734:ki 3731:Wi 3566:. 3533:}} 3527:{{ 3518:) 3514:• 3490:}} 3484:{{ 3448:}} 3442:{{ 3403:}} 3397:{{ 3305:}} 3299:{{ 3276:– 3128:-- 3105:I 2877:my 2728:}} 2722:{{ 2711:. 2197:– 2093:) 2089:• 1977:. 1886:}} 1880:{{ 1863:is 1771:| 1748:| 1598:) 1594:• 1579:? 1520:}} 1514:{{ 1361:.) 927:. 821:. 664:{{ 496:ki 493:Wi 441:ki 438:Wi 404:ki 401:Wi 329:ki 326:Wi 282:ki 279:Wi 247:ki 244:Wi 196:ki 193:Wi 139:50 134:40 129:35 124:34 119:33 114:32 109:31 99:29 94:28 89:27 84:26 79:25 74:20 69:10 3726:~ 3617:( 3605:( 3510:( 3368:. 2890:☻ 2830:☻ 2805:☻ 2521:☻ 2085:( 1806:— 1797:7 1590:( 1261:☻ 1234:, 1205:☻ 993:( 488:~ 433:~ 396:~ 321:~ 274:~ 239:~ 188:~ 60:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index