User talk:Quality check - Knowledge (XXG)

736:, and give my suggestion to creator of page by pasting tags. so that any other editor may also note it and improve it. Once anyone has improved that article, anyone can delete the appropriate tags. But i cannot wait to return next day, that the article gets modified or not; You cannot predict as some articles gets modified within seconds and some gets edited rarely. Check the preview of your article before Saving it to wikipedia, when you create a new article or otherwise. But you could not say that i have wrongly used any of tags (except tooshort). Also i'm getting mature with each edit. I'll be more careful in future regarding this. You are free to do anything. 1382:

incorrectly and frustrating people your reaction should not go from 'no, I'm not' to 'yes I am but i'll get better' to 'alright, i'm not better at the moment, but I will be'. If you refuse to acknowledge that there is a problem with your driving and drive incorrectly that much of the time then you should have your damn car taken away until you know the theory behind using it. Letting you keep it and drive around 'so you can get better' fails when you're getting better at such a slow pace that you

975:

frankly, downright annoying, especially on very young articles which were very obviously work in progress or development. I apologise if my earlier comments may have seemed harsh, but I see a number of other experienced and respected editors making very similar comments. I am sure that your enthusiasm and attention to detail can have a very useful part to play in Knowledge (XXG), but your effort really does need channelling in a different way and rather less contentious way.

168: 93: 828:. Ok, Each one is here on wikipedia to do whatever one likes, with an aim to contribute something. Some one is adding new pages, some may be modifying existing pages, some may be patroling these activities. You could not direct/advise others, who is doing his bit of work as per his/her interest to do something else. If you are so much concerned, You are welcome to add references to all pages to which i add unreferenced tag. I don't mind at all.Quality check 458: 2376: 2031: 4199: 3299: 3130: 3074: 2982: 4257: 4090: 3789: 3189: 4000: 3700: 1825: 1539: 1343:. The issue isn't that you are not getting better but more that you are getting better so slowly that you are still doing more harm than good and yet refuse to drop the stick. It is the same as driving; if someone is an appalling driver they should learn the theory before jumping into a car. If they jump into a car and end up running over five people then a plaintive 'but it is alright! There are some I 26: 3512: 2126: 2893: 2753: 2450: 2325: 1891: 1709: 1414: 705:

long enough that you should have some element of clue, but that seems sorely lacking. Please take some time over your edits, allow users have a chance to correct themselves and consider whether tagging articles with enough tags to double the article length is really helping the Wiki, especially when some of your 'concerns' could be fixed by you yourself in a matter of

4216:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3316:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3149:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3093:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3001:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1653: 4150: 2941: 1351:

to an article, one that is most of the time improper, that does not fix that error when fixing said error would take ten seconds of your time. I am sick and tired of being accused of bias for taking any action not laced in chocolates and rainbows, but I'll be nice. Show me one piece of evidence that I am biased and I will drop the case.

1098:

put that page into specialized category of articles with same deficiency. And editors, which have special interest/liking in adding cat/ref can work on them in their free time, without first finding uncat/unref pages. Adding a tag is just a first step in improving the page. Quality check 06:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

1800:

While not a firm requirement, I would appreciate it if you would request that some other editors review the article for appropriateness before moving it to "article space". Failure to ensure that it is written in encyclopedic style may result in another administrator deleting it again, so it'd likely

1428:

from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under

1347:

run over, and I'll run over less people next time!' isn't going to work. Bad example you're using, by the way; this isn't about one person turning an article into a good article. If the requirements for a good article were that it be too lines long and referenced then it would be easy, easy work, yet

1274:

So, please, as requested, tag appropriately, only. That's when tags are useful. But if you can't tag appropriately and some other editor has to follow you around to remove your inappropriate tags, or do the work of tagging db because you haven't bothered, it's using up other editor's time, and it's

974:

Just to add a pint of elucidation here, it was I who reverted the blanking of the talk page so that other editors would have a complete view of the concerns and issues that have been raised by numerous editors, myself included, over your particular style of tagging which I found to be unhelpful, and,

2783:

from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included

1763:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note

1350:

for. I am not pushing for 'big contributions'; do you really think referencing a two-line article, or learning how to use tags properly is 'big'? I am not against minor contributions; hells, I used to consider myself a wikignome. The problem is this; a wikignome fixes a minor error. You make an edit

1097:

becuase they instantly alert other editors about deficiency in that page. Otherwise all editors have to scan full page to find shortcomings in that page. No backlog is created, otherwise if they are not pointed out by anybody, the article may remain without ref/cat. Also, adding a tag automatically

953:

I know, KP Botany's comment was meant to be a sort of 'chin up, lad, you're doing better' comment, not further criticism. Blanking talkpages does not end a debate; in fact, it goes against the ethos of wikipedia by hiding information and giving only a partial view of any given situation. If you have

704:

I'm going to give you a sort of all-encompassing warning. You've been repeatedly warned for improper CSD tagging, improper PRODS and useless drive-by tagging of articles. You blanking the talkpage messages is indicative you have read them, so I'll just say it: please cut it out. You have been around

611:

You might want to try cleaning up some of the articles you tag yourself. At the end of the day you tagging them is not improving the article per se, it is simply bringing it to the attention of others who have to improve it. If you tried wikifying it/referencing it/expanding it yourself it would cut

2602:

Actually, in terms of our copyright policies, your further revisions don't quite address the problem. You can only use previously published text if it can be proven to be free for reuse or if you clearly mark brief excerpts with quotation marks or block quotation. I'll fix this one with the correct

1247:

The list or article is not even readable. It's just a paste from somewhere else and will be deleted in minutes. A "news release" is not a single bad sentence in a completely unreadable article. If the article cannot be repaired tag it for speedy deletion, don't waste time with a tag that implies

1327:

that after ppl. pointed my tag errors, my edits are more careful now. As my edit errors are getting lowered each day. You have to be somewhat patient, as no one can be perfectionist in one day. If my errors are getting multiplied each day after you pointed it out, then you should have the right to

1074:

The tags are in use for informing editors when there is a deficiency in the article that needs to be corrected. You waste other editors time by adding articles to a massive backlog when in many cases you could have solved the issue yourself in the time it took to add the tag. The tags are there to

2048:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient

1014:

Sorry,i could not understand how your time gets wasted? If you see any unref. or uncat tag, and know about proper category/reference; plz add that and that's all. I add these tags if im not sure about cat/ref and instead request other users to do it by adding tags. Quality check 12:48, 4 January

899:

So, you have put a couple of good and useful tags on articles. But you've been wrong far more often than you've been right, so, please, read the tags, read the articles, read the article histories, tag at the appropriate time (not 10 minutes after the article was started, while it is still being

504:

Might I suggest before plastering a new site with banners that you wait just a little to how it develops. The article was only 16 minutes old before you added your templates.A significant mountain in Snowdonia is likely to be notable and if references are required (but you will see many mountain

1381:

Actually KP Botany's estimates of your edits say that around 95% of your contributions are incorrect. If we're using your example, then; parking incorrectly is frustrating to other drivers, against the rules in some areas and generally annoying. When confronted with the fact that you are parking

1109:

the correct tag on an article alerts the editors to shortcomings. If you, for example, put that the lead section is too short, and they click on the link and find out the lead section is part of a long article, and you've mistakenly put the tag on an article with only one sentence, they'll just

246:

template. I surely believe the article needs improvement i.e the list is incomplete. However, I must ask in what sense does it need cleanup? I don't see the article to be unwikified or having spellings or grammar mistakes. I could be wrong. If you saw other error/s, and tagged it wrongly, kindly

1018:

His time is wasted because rather than having 1) user sees uncat/unref page 2) user refs/categorises page it turns into 1) user sees uncat/unref page 2) user tags page as such and 3) page gets shoved in an absolutely massive backlog that someone else then clears at a later date. How can you not

769:

After Ironholds, after many more, really. Sorry, you're putting unreferenced tags on referenced articles, non-notability tags on articles that assert their notability. I've just spent half an hour cleaning up your garbage. You're tagging articles while people are writing them and have clearly

550:

Of course I can delete these tags. I have been a Wikipedian for over 4 years with nearly 5000 edits and having created over 150 pages. I prefer to be neither thanked for my contributions nor patronised by an editor who chooses not to answer a valid point that new articles need to be allowed a

805:

I have re-checked my today's edits. Plz don't mind, but you seem to be allergic to tags. You just reverted my edits, most of the tags on these articles were applicable. Many of the articles were improved, after addition of different tags by me. Try looking at some other angle. Quality check

644:

Again, by its nature as a stub, it will probably have only one sentence and one source. Find longer articles with short leads and work on the leads yourself rather than tagging articles that are already supplied with information that they are short and need work, ie, they're stubs.

864:

who, aged 16, comforted a polar bear without being torn apart (blatant inaccuracy) the polar bear was then treated by EMT's (blatant inaccuracy) and the child was offered a $ 1000 scholarship to any college in the area. A simple google search would have shown the article to be

1071:. But in my opinion, other user's can productively use their time by looking at tags (instant attention to deficiency in page) and then adding ref/cat. Otherwise other editors, have to scan full page to find shortcomings in that page. Quality check 13:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 809:

Heres an angle you might like to look at things from; rather than adding an "unreferenced" tag to an article and other bits of makework, why not add referencing? A two-line article doesn't require more than 1 reference most times, and I'm assuming you have access to google.

1270:

So, look and think, and tag appropriately. You sound like you want to contribute, and tagging can be a useful contribution, particularly when you categorize along the way. And, frankly, I don't search for categories, but most of the time you can guess an easy category.

1023:. If it is unreferenced, google search the building name and find references to add to the article. I discussed this with you before; if the article is, say, two lines long, finding references for it does not take much time. Tagging the article and then waiting for someone 2536:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.

869:

but your action? Tagging it as 'unreferenced'. You're completely missing problems right under your nose and doing makework that simply isn't neccessary. Tagging deletable articles with 'needs to be referenced' isn't helpful to anything but your edit count; in the words of

1977:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.

1366:

You quoted a very good example, but all my errors are minor, that they cannot damage a page. In context of your example, my errors are similar to like driving car at slow speed, not parking at proper place, or talking to fellow pessengers while driving etc. You are just

332:

Hi, I see you have proposed the deletion of several articles on towns and villages in Kerala. Could you please explain your reasoning? Unfortunately, the PROD reason is blank on each of them, so I'm not sure what your thoughts on these particular articles are. Thanks.

544:

Hi, Pasting these notices will give someone (including creator) a chance to improve that page. You can also delete these notices, if these are unnecessary or after modifying that page. Thanks for your contributions to wikipedia. Quality check 17:08, 13 December 2008

954:

problems with your talkpage being too long I suggest you instead archive it; if you don't know how, you can give me a poke and I'll show you. Also, could you please sign your comments by typing ~~~~? I'm not quite sure what you mean by 'wikipedia foe', and actually

2825:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Knowledge (XXG) guidelines.

1470:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Knowledge (XXG) guidelines.

4281:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

4114:

3815:

2868:- why is the distinction necessary on a navigation template if the distinction does not exist in the article titles? I have trimmed the template by removing the piped parts of the links but left in the words "(Deemed University)", which has the same effect. 1339:@Actually I dont believe that is so. As mentioned after you had been warned by five editors for varying errors and still failed to see there was a problem. Eventually you admitted there was and said you would get better, I left it and you then get warned 917:

What both of you are doing now is, to justify yourself. You just want to prove that you are on right side, and i'm on wrong side. That's why you restored my talk page, which was blanked by me. To just show that i was erred earlier, is not a good spirit.

2151:

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

2144:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our 1512:

She is the wife of a notable person, and the mother of another. that does not make her notable. I seem indeed to have neglected to save it after typing the speedy delete. I will do so now. Feel free to place a hangon and another admin will decide.

3215:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2264: 2237: 2213: 924:

In future, whenever i'll come across any of the pages, which need some improvement. Then i'll definately offer my assistance either by adding the content to that page or i'll add tags which will be applicable (that is improving the page too).

2103:

Hi. Schools aren't inherently notable and the articles were merely short "boilerplate" copies of one another. I can put them back, but I can't guarantee they'll stay up without expansion and verifiable notability. I'll only need a moment.

3569:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

1765: 2468:

infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of

1909:

4284:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has

400:

located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!

835:

you put the tags on is that you put the tags on while authors were clearly still writing the article, like the author who put up the Netherlands article who clearly posted in his edit summary that he was preparing the space for the

3607:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

2637:, user talk page, or contributions page; this allows other editors easy access to your talk page and contributions log. The lack of such a link is widely viewed as obstructive." There are instructions there for repairing this. -- 1628:

Thanx for your edits. At that time i tagged your article, as i thought that these village stub articles created by you are very similar (almost an exact copy) to each other. And are just one liner mostly. You can say that

2593:. Presuming this to be the source, you must properly attribute it as well as enclose in quotation marks text you have copied. All previously published content is presumed to be copyrighted unless it is verifiably not. -- 348:

Hi, Thanks for your concerns about articles on towns and villages in Kerala. Request you to expand these articles, which are created by you with suitable information, as these articles contain almost no conetnt. Plz see

895:

Also, you don't need to put uncategorized on stubs, because the stub IS a category. These are just a few of the many instances in which you have inappropriately added tags, that simply made unnecessary work for other

1723:, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read 1113:

You also put uncat tags on articles that are categorized. Again, since the category is sitting there at the bottom of the page, screaming "category," but you say it's uncategorized you may be perceived as a vandal,

4043: 3743: 4118:

3819:

3219:

900:

written, and while the editor has clearly indicated it's in process), and tag articles with appropriate tags (not unreferenced on totally deletable bs, not too short and uncategorized on articles labeled as stub).

4111: 3259:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1240:

Notice, you provided useful information by categorizing it as an airport stub. Of course, you also tagged it as unreferenced within an hour of it being created, but that's just annoying, not necessarily wrong.

3212: 998:

Instead of tagging articles as uncategorized and unreferenced, could you please spend time adding relevant categories and references to articles instead. It's a much more productive use of your and our time.

2308:

saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Knowledge (XXG). Happy editing!

931:

on wikipedia (there are only few instances of mistakes also along with process of learning) and i don't need certification/rating from anyone about my work. Only some wikipedia foe can nominate me for a

4027:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3727:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 843:

of your tags. Your tags just got in the way of editing. And, no, I'm not allergic to tags. I left the handful that were useful, such as the article that clearly needed deleted as soon as possible.

2914: 2401:

by copying text into Knowledge (XXG) from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to

846:

However, you appear to only have an accuracy rating of about 5% with tagging, meaning you're creating more work than you are doing. I will ask that you be blocked if this pattern continues. --

1386:

frustrate other drivers for a long period of time. Thanks for dodging my comment about my alleged 'bias', by the way; nice to know people have no problem throwing that word around willy-nilly.

2920:

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

263:

for deletion. Can you please explain why the article needs to be deleted? Dr. Anup Ghoshal is an eminent playback singer from India. You are welcome to expand the article and make it better.

4013: 3713: 2815:

the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on

509:

is always a good starting point. A more constructive approach might be research the article and add content or just hold back for a while. Removing the banners would also be a good start.

3812: 1371:. And if i am admitting my minor mistakes, you are treating me like an errorenous editor. I have done good editing on wikipedia and most of my edits are positive contributions. Check all 206:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 131:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1857:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1571:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 58:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 4169: 3042: 236: 791:

No, you don't add tags only when you're sure about it, or if you do, you need to spend more time making sure, because I just removed dozens that were incorrectly added by you. --

3040:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 2682: 1853:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1567:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

202:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

127:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

54:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2344:, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of 2268: 1212: 2685:, and more than 49 edits). This has been done because the page is a blatant advert that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article (see 2206:

a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

2052:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

743:

warnings you dont seem to have slowed down. As noted below, many edit summaries include things like WORKING ON THE ARTICLE PLEASE DO NOT DELETE yet you still tag-and-bag.

1049:

would have found his personal home page at the university, the pages he maintains at institutes he lectures at and a list of his publications as the first four results.

360:

Um, no, I didn't create these articles. I'm just asking you why you want to delete them. They look fine to me as stubs waiting expansion. CSD A3 does not apply to them.

4277: 2006: 3524:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. 569:

on wikipedia. If i feel some page need improvement, i always give my suggestion by pasting these tags. If you are experimenting with your article, please prefer using

635:

Actually too short is about the lead of longer articles, not about one sentence articles. By putting it in that you will categorize it and make the category huge.

195:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

120:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1846:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1560:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

47:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1842:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1556:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 191:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 116:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 43:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 3536: 892:. It's for the introductory sections of articles, only. And, if you had read the tag, instead of just exploding it all over the place you would have seen that. 2906:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the 1020: 437:

yes, I know it seems strange at first, but the logic is, where could we make the cut-off? there is verifiable third party informtion about any inhabited place.

3597: 2191:. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our 934:. I suggest that you should close this debate (which you should have done it earlier) by blanking my talk page. As i told you earlier that i'll be careful now. 3843: 4266: 4101: 3801: 3439: 3201: 2493: 2337: 2227: 1934: 757:

Plz don't prove yourself right by quoting others. I can myself read it.I already told you that i'll be careful now.Quality check 11:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

920:

THE BETTER IS that you should start a debate on not-using any of the tags on wikipedia at all or favour to reserve it for administrators/seasoned user only

2489: 2484:

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge (XXG) to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you

2279: 1930: 1925:

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge (XXG) to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you

978:

As things stand I too would be inclined to give a third warning but I will hold back. It is a new year and perhaps things will now change for the better.

2253:

If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org

2183:, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from 2065: 1079:

to clear up the mess a dog has made in the park; a lot of effort on someone elses part for a problem I could have corrected with minimal effort myself.

612:

out the middle man (and also be a lot more satisfying to the user than drive-by tagging, trust me on this'n). The backlogs in those sort of areas are

420:

Hi, I would suggest that you stop prodding Indian villages. Inhabited settlements are, by long standing convention, notable and none will be deleted.

4228: 3617: 3328: 3161: 3105: 3013: 2780: 2742: 2439: 2061: 2011:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1880: 1862: 1576: 1425: 350: 211: 136: 67: 3851: 471: 1332:

pressing for is to make big contributions, but i say that each contribution count, however small it may be. As one editor can not turn a page into

289:

guidelines, as the references are pointing only to a single source. Add multiple & reliable references, which are reliable and do not point to

1304:

to reach and modify that page, if i hadn't made an edit there. So my each contribution resulted in improving the page. You can check all my edits.

1265:

you categorized it. However, the article wasn't unreferenced! And you should have easily seen that there was a reference in the very first line.

3527:

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

1160: 2603:

application of quotation marks, but please remember this rule in the future so that you don't inadvertently violate the copyright policy again.

1118:

you've wasted the time you spent tagging, plus the person who is actually working on the article now has to waste their own time removing your

3625: 3047: 2426: 2081: 3435: 773:

Also, check the edit histories. If it has just been created a few minutes ago, someone may still be working on it. Stop. Breath. Read. --

4160: 4142: 4065: 3912: 3765: 3639: 3284: 3924: 3389:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge (XXG)'s 2497: 2294: 1938: 2220:

and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name,

1804:

If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask. I apologize for the amount of time it took me to respond to your request. :)

3551:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 2702: 1969: 1854: 1568: 1372: 1324: 928: 55: 3482: 3425: 1254:

Users are not allowed to advertise on Knowledge (XXG). A speedy tag is appropriate, but no editing will improve an advertisement that

2049:

information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

1067:??? These are just a request to the other user, to add proper ref/cat if you are not sure about them. And your reply does not answer, 2953: 2903: 1839: 1553: 1300:,because i got many warnings. but that news tag was applicable there. About point 3 and 4, i want to say that it was impossible for 1110:

think you're a vandal. Which is what a lot of people may think when someone comes by and puts a totally incorrect tag on an article.

577:. Because its not possible for me to know exaclty, when any editor will modify that page. Quality check 18:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC) 4096: 4080: 3847: 3470: 3413: 3141: 1368: 2945: 2188: 888:

Yes, it's like tagging stubs, "too short." First, that's what a stub tag means, that the article is too short. Second, that tags

1046: 397: 3601: 3593: 2830: 2397: 1475: 4061: 3761: 3280: 2732: 1688: 4036: 3736: 2793: 2176: 2002: 1438: 788:

Hi, i add tags only when i am sure about it. May be some1 had improved that article and forget to delete the appropriate tag.

3354: 3346: 2670: 2659: 1963: 1898: 1884: 4212:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3966: 3873: 3398: 3312:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3145:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3089:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2997:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2414: 183:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 108:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3920: 1133:

of yours are wrong, it is not useful. And, it is not the first step in improving anything--it's just a waste of time. --

4217: 4213: 3621: 3579: 3317: 3150: 3094: 3002: 1847: 1561: 196: 121: 48: 3858: 3666: 4270: 4105: 3805: 3478: 3421: 3271:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3205: 2907: 2392: 2383: 2357: 2290: 2196: 4048: 3748: 3276: 3196: 3180: 1794: 394:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 2762: 1834:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1673: 1548:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 566: 35:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3393:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

3586: 2899: 2884: 1681: 903:

But, yes, you've got some right, and done a bit of good work. Focus on that, and do more of that. That's all. --

588:

Hi, there's no need to add a qualifier at the end of a title if there's no other articles with the same name; see

2925: 1998: 324:

Please add some online and reliable references from multiple sources.Quality check 08:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

3394: 2586:

This doesn't seem to be supported by the cited source, as I don't find the text string RDB anywhere. However, I

2402: 2352:

such as sentences or images. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators

1769: 1728: 1544: 3633: 2718: 2706: 2161: 2137: 2119: 2030: 1076: 4024: 3724: 1075:

highlight areas that editors can be improved, but the way you use them is silly. It is like me calling in the

1019:

understand how categories and references work? If it is an article about a building in Brisbane, stick it in

179: 3962: 3869: 3085: 2963: 2850: 2788:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 1633:. But now, i understand that in long run these are really very useful for improving the scope of wikipedia. 1433:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 365: 338: 310: 203: 128: 3520: 3429: 3382: 2789: 2630: 2465: 2341: 2333: 2192: 2145: 1906: 1677: 1434: 387: 4127: 3954: 3865: 3825: 3796: 3780: 1602:

after yourself once artibarily tagging such articles for deletion earlier. Keep up the good work . I have

638:

Notice the article says on it that it is a "stub," that's what is used to identify one sentence articles.

3308: 3272: 2501: 1942: 383: 31: 3662: 3559: 3036: 2873: 2109: 1614: 1211:

Hello, Quality check. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at

733: 486: 464: 457: 425: 4164: 3532: 2799:

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding

2705:

to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at

2195:. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be 2069: 2044:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1676:. More importantly, do not insert copyrighted material into Knowledge (XXG). For more information, see 1444:

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding

866: 4208: 2993: 2305: 2273: 2247: 2217: 242:

Hello and thankyou for taking a look at the above mentioned article. You tagged that article with the

167: 104: 92: 4292: 3412:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3357:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs citations from 3021: 2949: 2921: 1830: 4007: 3707: 3552: 3248: 3239: 680:). Give him a day, then tag it if you need to. Adding a category to that one was easy, though. -- 4184: 3629: 2726: 2714: 2710: 2638: 2613: 2594: 2528: 2430: 2361: 2310: 2157: 2133: 1391: 1356: 1286: 1220: 1196: 1138: 1084: 1054: 1032: 963: 908: 879: 861: 851: 815: 796: 778: 748: 722: 685: 667: 653: 621: 597: 528:

within minutes of its construction. In my view this is not acceptable Wikipedian behaviour at all.

4020: 3720: 3268: 3252: 188: 113: 40: 3654: 3227: 2957: 2846: 2817: 2648: 2542: 1983: 1775: 1462: 361: 334: 306: 2591: 286: 2612:

Thank you for fixing your signature, which does make it much easier to communicate with you. --

2507:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1948:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1734:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1296:

As given by you above, point 1 is a good contribution. In point 2, I was more careful in using

677: 4123: 3981: 3939: 3897: 3821: 3681: 3497: 3455: 3113: 3055: 2141: 2089: 2016: 406: 226: 151: 4032: 3732: 3264: 3256: 2842: 2838: 2634: 2289:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow

1843: 1724: 1557: 1487: 1483: 192: 117: 44: 4055: 3755: 2869: 2492:. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see 2420: 2105: 1933:. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see 1607: 983: 556: 533: 514: 479: 421: 270: 4138: 4035:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4028: 3735:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3728: 3390: 3267:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3260: 2834: 2785: 2686: 2674: 2666: 2461: 2410: 2075: 1902: 1720: 1479: 1430: 1320: 1297: 714: 695:

Hi, Thanks for your suggestions. I'll be more careful in future. Plz read my comment below.

4288: 4236: 3336: 3169: 3017: 2804: 2694: 2512: 2375: 2153: 2040: 1953: 1870: 1739: 1584: 1449: 1234:

Use edit summaries, also, please, if you really want to help, as you keep saying you are.

1181: 506: 75: 3839:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

3368: 3362: 3358: 3313: 3146: 3090: 2998: 1835: 1549: 1336:, it require the collaboration of many editors. Quality check 10:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 1333: 589: 184: 109: 36: 3614:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

3432:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 1719:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 4262: 4247: 4174: 2722: 2678: 2522: 2457: 2443: 1809: 1387: 1352: 1329: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1301: 1282: 1216: 1192: 1134: 1080: 1050: 1028: 1004: 959: 904: 875: 847: 825: 811: 792: 774: 744: 718: 681: 663: 649: 617: 593: 3378: 3374: 2460:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

2406: 2184: 1901:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

4308: 3446:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3222: 2829:

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

2776: 2746: 2538: 2526:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 1979: 1967:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 1755: 1753:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 1520: 1497: 1474:

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

1421: 1407: 444: 217: 142: 2300:

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at

3977: 3973: 3935: 3931: 3893: 3889: 3677: 3673: 3493: 3489: 3451: 3447: 3109: 2917:

until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

2845:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 2085: 2012: 1490:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 402: 260: 252: 222: 147: 3999: 3699: 2761:

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the

1824: 1538: 25: 2058:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

3958: 3572: 3548: 2560: 2552: 2180: 2125: 1639: 1173: 1045:. You tagged it as unreferenced and left it for someone else to clean up when a 1042: 979: 552: 529: 510: 266: 3600:

justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See

2892: 2752: 2629:

Your note at my talk page suggests that you need to repair your signature. See

2449: 2324: 1890: 1708: 1413: 4232: 3332: 3165: 1866: 1580: 1177: 871: 71: 2258: 860:

I'd also like to point an interesting one out; an article about a man called

4296: 4240: 4188: 4131: 4069: 3985: 3943: 3901: 3829: 3769: 3685: 3643: 3501: 3474: 3459: 3402: 3340: 3288: 3233: 3173: 3117: 3061: 3025: 2969: 2929: 2877: 2854: 2792:. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the 2736: 2651: 2641: 2616: 2597: 2546: 2433: 2364: 2329: 2313: 2165: 2113: 2093: 2045: 2020: 1987: 1874: 1813: 1805: 1779: 1695: 1622: 1588: 1524: 1501: 1437:. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the 1395: 1376: 1360: 1290: 1224: 1200: 1185: 1142: 1088: 1058: 1036: 1008: 1000: 987: 967: 912: 883: 855: 819: 800: 782: 752: 726: 689: 671: 657: 625: 601: 560: 537: 518: 494: 448: 429: 410: 369: 342: 314: 274: 230: 155: 79: 3546:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

874:

you are 'washing the trains the same day the graffiti artists bomb them'.

1749: 1716: 1702: 1515: 1492: 1460:

the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on

1215:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

525: 439: 302: 4149: 4039:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3739:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2940: 4112:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Gurudwara Shri Jyoti Saroop Sahib

4017:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3880: 3717:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3255:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2956:

and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —

2564: 1599: 641:

As to only one source, did you want me to put a source for every word?

396: 3213:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls in Punjab

3123:

Orphaned non-free image File:Central University of Punjab (emblem).gif

1672:

Please don't remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did at

2212:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the

1646: 4167:. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at 551:

reasonable period of grace before being assigned improvement tags.

4170:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 18 § Tobha

3417: 2709:. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see 2234:

If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted

391: 4052:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3953:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3911:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3752:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3658: 3653:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3469:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2915:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Jarnail Singh (journalist)

386:

and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should

4042:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

3742:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

1375:

uptil now and tell me when i run over others??? Quality check

4011:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

3916: 2633:: "Signatures must include at least one internal link to your 1105:

tag on an article, you simple confuse or irritate an editor.

770:

stated that is what they are doing in their edit summaries.

2669:

to inform you that the page you created on December 27 2007,

2405:. Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our 293:

of Anup Ghoshal. Quality check 08:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

290: 4197: 3813:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Trilok Singh Chitarkar

3510: 3297: 3128: 3072: 2980: 2821: