Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:RVictoria

Source 📝

23: 49:
content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about
27: 99: 75: 46: 39: 71: 31: 114: 51: 64:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
107: 103: 30:
your contributions to Knowledge (XXG), but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
98:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
113:
For information on how to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) when you have a conflict of interest, please see
124: 50:
that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by
85: 57:
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
118: 35: 84:
to the Knowledge (XXG) article or website of your organization in other articles (see
94:
so that you do not accidentally breach Knowledge (XXG)'s content policies.
22: 129: 78:, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors. 45:
All editors are required to comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s
62:
Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating
70:. Everyone is welcome to provide information about 115:our frequently asked questions for organizations 54:and writing with as little bias as possible. 8: 68:Be cautious about deletion discussions 7: 42:or close connection to the subject. 14: 21: 1: 104:verifiability of information 130:18:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 145: 92:Exercise great caution 32:you have written about 100:neutral point of view 47:neutral point of view 26:Hello, RVictoria. We 86:Knowledge (XXG):Spam 76:deletion discussions 40:conflict of interest 17:Conflict of interest 72:independent sources 38:, you may have a 136: 127: 121: 52:reliable sources 25: 144: 143: 139: 138: 137: 135: 134: 133: 125: 119: 117:. Thank you. -- 108:autobiographies 36:Parentline Plus 34:in the article 19: 12: 11: 5: 142: 140: 96: 95: 89: 79: 65: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 141: 132: 131: 128: 122: 116: 111: 109: 105: 101: 93: 90: 87: 83: 82:Avoid linking 80: 77: 73: 69: 66: 63: 60: 59: 58: 55: 53: 48: 43: 41: 37: 33: 29: 24: 16: 112: 97: 91: 81: 67: 61: 56: 44: 20: 120:Orange Mike 28:welcome 106:, and 126:Talk 74:in 123:| 110:. 102:, 88:).

Index

Information icon
welcome
you have written about
Parentline Plus
conflict of interest
neutral point of view
reliable sources
independent sources
deletion discussions
Knowledge (XXG):Spam
neutral point of view
verifiability of information
autobiographies
our frequently asked questions for organizations
Orange Mike
Talk
18:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.