302:- As you know, I am new to wikipedia, and would need sometime to find credible evidence. But I gaurantee, that this is my account and not related to any other person. I am sure, while signingup on wikipedia, it asks for email id and verifies it. You can clearly see that my email id would be unique & has no relation what so ever with the other account. Also, just because I was supporting the page to stay, doesn't mean that I am related to other editors who are doing the same. Also the reason for my block says my behaviour is same as jacbo, which I don't find true. The behaviour is nowhere close to him, you can clearly check the deletion page. It also states, defending yourself against clamins, I agree to doing this, because I was not aware that on Knowledge (XXG), you cannot respond to claims made on you. Claims like COI. The reason I had to respond is because some of the editors were aggresively calling me COI, which after a point becomes to harsh. Hence you see the reaction to those claims. Also, I think I hardly made edits & replied to other editors (3 times i think), and you can see the behaviour of jacob towards it. Please take time to monitor all these aspects. I clearly do not wish to be blocked becuase some one feels I am not legit.
393:& has no relation what so ever with the other account. Also, just because I was supporting the page to stay, doesn't mean that I am related to other editors who are doing the same. Also the reason for my block says my behaviour is same as jacbo, which I don't find true. The behaviour is nowhere close to him, you can clearly check the deletion page. It also states, defending yourself against clamins, I agree to doing this, because I was not aware that on Knowledge (XXG), you cannot respond to claims made on you. Claims like COI. The reason I had to respond is because some of the editors were aggresively calling me COI, which after a point becomes to harsh. Hence you see the reaction to those claims. Also, I think I hardly made edits & replied to other editors (3 times i think), and you can see the behaviour of jacob towards it. Please take time to monitor all these aspects. I clearly do not wish to be blocked becuase some one feels I am not legit
307:
161:
23:
392:
As you know, I am new to wikipedia, and would need sometime to find credible evidence. But I gaurantee, that this is my account and not related to any other person. I am sure, while signingup on wikipedia, it asks for email id and verifies it. You can clearly see that my email id would be unique
460:
It's easy to use different email addresses for different accounts, so that means nothing. The technical evidence comes from your actual connection when you made your edits, so you still need to explain how it can appear that you were both editing from the same place at the same time.
479:- I see, if my reponses are looking to come on same time as his, then it is because he was repsonding 24x7. It will be matched irrespective of my time of replying. Also, I will try to find some technical evidence.
246:
Hi, I think I have been banned for wrong reason. I do not think I fall under sockpuppet category. Moreover, I have no relations with the user jacob, so I would like you to reconsider the ban on me. Thank you.
42:(COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Knowledge (XXG) articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
27:
111:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see
420:
452:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
347:
292:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
201:
112:
59:
articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
437:
277:
342:
196:
31:
258:
The technical evidence indicates otherwise, so you would need to explain how the two accounts appear to be operated by the same person.
118:
Please take a few moments to read and review
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to
119:
104:
84:
44:
49:
466:
361:
263:
215:
320:
174:
314:
168:
319:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
173:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
127:
123:
476:
462:
299:
259:
135:
419:
are operated by the same person, and that person used multiple accounts to attempt to feign consensus at
70:
480:
394:
325:
179:
146:
39:
416:
35:
30:
your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
131:
94:
93:
to the
Knowledge (XXG) article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see
446:
286:
145:
Hi, Thank you for letting me know about the details. I will go through the entire doc :)
424:
488:
470:
427:
402:
267:
154:
139:
22:
415:
The technical evidence here is overwhelming; this account and
52:
for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
305:
159:
434:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
274:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
454:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
294:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
375:
371:
365:
356:
352:
338:
334:
330:
229:
225:
219:
210:
206:
192:
188:
184:
313:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
167:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
66:on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the
421:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/PromptCloud
103:so that you do not violate Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
7:
79:when discussing affected articles,
14:
21:
62:instead, you are encouraged to
17:Managing a conflict of interest
45:conflict of interest guideline
1:
489:09:37, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
471:09:30, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
428:14:13, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
403:09:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
268:07:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
155:07:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
140:05:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
317:, who declined the request.
171:, who declined the request.
26:Hello, Raj Bipin Bhatt. We
504:
438:guide to appealing blocks
278:guide to appealing blocks
57:avoid editing or creating
484:
398:
150:
310:
164:
101:exercise great caution
32:you have written about
362:change block settings
309:
216:change block settings
163:
120:neutral point of view
50:FAQ for organizations
40:conflict of interest
477:Boing! said Zebedee
463:Boing! said Zebedee
300:Boing! said Zebedee
260:Boing! said Zebedee
417:User:Jacobkoshy333
311:
165:
38:, you may have a
495:
451:
445:
381:
379:
368:
350:
348:deleted contribs
308:
291:
285:
235:
233:
222:
204:
202:deleted contribs
162:
105:content policies
75:
69:
25:
503:
502:
498:
497:
496:
494:
493:
492:
481:Raj Bipin Bhatt
457:
449:
443:
442:, then use the
431:
406:
395:Raj Bipin Bhatt
369:
359:
345:
328:
326:Raj Bipin Bhatt
321:blocking policy
306:
297:
289:
283:
282:, then use the
271:
249:
223:
213:
199:
182:
180:Raj Bipin Bhatt
175:blocking policy
160:
147:Raj Bipin Bhatt
128:autobiographies
73:
67:
64:propose changes
34:in the article
19:
12:
11:
5:
501:
499:
474:
473:
432:
413:
409:Decline reason
390:
386:Request reason
383:
304:
272:
256:
252:Decline reason
244:
240:Request reason
237:
158:
144:
130:. Thank you.
109:
108:
98:
88:
83:your COI (see
77:
60:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
500:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
472:
468:
464:
459:
458:
456:
455:
448:
441:
439:
430:
429:
426:
422:
418:
412:
410:
405:
404:
400:
396:
389:
387:
382:
377:
373:
367:
363:
358:
354:
349:
344:
340:
339:global blocks
336:
335:active blocks
332:
327:
322:
318:
316:
315:administrator
303:
301:
296:
295:
288:
281:
279:
270:
269:
265:
261:
255:
253:
248:
243:
241:
236:
231:
227:
221:
217:
212:
208:
203:
198:
194:
193:global blocks
190:
189:active blocks
186:
181:
176:
172:
170:
169:administrator
157:
156:
152:
148:
142:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
116:
114:
106:
102:
99:
96:
92:
91:avoid linking
89:
86:
82:
78:
72:
65:
61:
58:
55:
54:
53:
51:
47:
46:
41:
37:
33:
29:
24:
16:
475:
453:
435:
433:
414:
408:
407:
391:
385:
384:
357:creation log
324:
312:
298:
293:
275:
273:
257:
251:
250:
245:
239:
238:
211:creation log
178:
166:
143:
132:Lemongirl942
117:
110:
100:
90:
80:
71:request edit
63:
56:
43:
20:
85:WP:DISCLOSE
36:PromptCloud
425:--jpgordon
353:filter log
207:filter log
76:template);
436:read the
372:checkuser
331:block log
276:read the
226:checkuser
185:block log
343:contribs
197:contribs
124:sourcing
81:disclose
447:unblock
366:unblock
287:unblock
220:unblock
113:WP:PAID
95:WP:SPAM
28:welcome
440:first
280:first
485:talk
467:talk
399:talk
264:talk
151:talk
136:talk
126:and
48:and
376:log
323:).
230:log
177:).
115:).
487:)
469:)
450:}}
444:{{
423:.
411::
401:)
388::
370:•
364:•
360:•
355:•
351:•
346:•
341:•
337:•
333:•
290:}}
284:{{
266:)
254::
242::
224:•
218:•
214:•
209:•
205:•
200:•
195:•
191:•
187:•
153:)
138:)
122:,
97:);
87:);
74:}}
68:{{
483:(
465:(
397:(
380:)
378:)
374:(
329:(
262:(
234:)
232:)
228:(
183:(
149:(
134:(
107:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
