User talk:Rees11 - Knowledge (XXG)

724:

off in this case, and it's certainly been done before. But in a Times piece yesterday, the paper also made it clear that it had the help of Knowledge (XXG) staffers who suppressed the news popping up there too. Since Knowledge (XXG) is crowd-sourced and openly editable, the news did manage to arrive on the online encyclopedia several times, whereupon it was quickly erased and sometimes the offending page was frozen to prevent any further user-editing. Rohde's own Knowledge (XXG) entry was even edited by a colleague immediately after his kidnap to enhance the Islam-friendliness of Rohde's previous journalistic work. This information dance on Knowledge (XXG) all happened with the specific help of the site's founder, Jimmy Wales. But while commenting on the moral angle of the Knowledge (XXG) tampering, Wales noted: "We were really helped by the fact that it hadn’t appeared in a place we would regard as a reliable source...I would have had a really hard time with it if it had." And that's where this story gets interesting to people who believe in freedom of information: In essence The New York Times suppressed the info themselves, and by influencing other old media outlets, which then enabled the new media outlet of Knowledge (XXG) to feel okay about continuing the propagandizing. It's a journalistic moral ouroboros, for sure, and it raises a couple of questions. Did Knowledge (XXG) damage its reputation as a crowd-based and open-access information source? The answer is yes, a little (and it's not the first time Knowledge (XXG)'s admins have been caught manipulating entries). Knowledge (XXG) isn't a traditional media outlet, and therefore has no hard or soft journalistic moral code to abide by, which means it can be more flexible in its actions--and the fact a life was at stake here is a mitigating fact. But Wales' excuse still sounds particularly weak. As a result, the next questions about Knowledge (XXG) are: What other news pieces is it hiding? And will users trust in the site as a news source take a hit?

1239:... the thing is that bengt gustavson did invent the closed system drug transfer device, and this device did become phaseal. yet you and our other editor don't think that this is relevent, or you are thinking that this is a promotional statement. its not, and my problem is that there is nothing published out there in internet land. so here is the question: what do you think that i can say so that phaseal can be associated with a closed system drug transfer device? we tried linking it to the 20+ scientific studies backing phaseal, but this was taken down (my whole scientific studies relating to a closed system drug transfer device page was deleted). next i try and link phaseal as the name given to the original CSTD, and that is also deemed promotional... 2146:

sources listed. I'm just curious, do you consider academic sources and media newspaper and journal articles to be illegitimate? I added an extensive amount of information to the page for you to delete it within hours for an unfounded reason. In that amount of time, less than 5 hours, were you in fact able to go gain hard copies of all the books, as well as look up all my journal articles in order to show that it was unfounded? Or did you really just not like what you read and decide to remove it with absolutely no basis in reality by stating it was "unsupported information"?

2316:

your Wiki user page provides a quick link to a site that sells your music CD, promotes your wife’s business and gives a link to your Amazon wish to buy you and your family gifts speaks volumes and reveals the hypocrisy of your arguments. I have no desire to continue an exchange with you. However, if you continue to make unfounded charges against me, delete legitimate and properly cited material from pages I work on, I will have no choice but to respond in every single instance and to raise serious issues about your posting history and reporting patterns.

152: 1235:

know that no-one can 'own' a term here, but hey, i gotta do what my bosses tell me!!!! if you do a little research into this industry, you will find out that there are four or five competitors. the thing is that phaseal IS the only closed system drug transfer device, and that the competitors all use a filter system, and filter systems leak like, well, a filter. you can see this for yourself, and you can get an idea of what we are trying to do by watching this video on youtube

42:. I took several screen captures from my DVD. He's only on-screen for maybe 30 seconds in two separate clips in "Joey", although he also provides the fake call on the horserace, which is actually stock footage from Santa Anita. That brings up a funny sidebar - "Metropolis" is always assumed to be New York City, but the 1950s series was filmed in Hollywood, and presto! Metropolis = Los Angeles! Makes me wonder whether "Smallville" in that context was actually Fresno. 1817: 1729:. That is why I double checked and edited accordingly - I accept your comments about plurals, possessives et al; but grammar rules rarely, in my experience, unduly trouble the naming of bands ! Google searches brought up 88's far more than 88s too. I am not precious about this, or intend to re-edit the article, but just thought I would point out that I did not undertake the edit in a flippant manner. 2385: 1628: 613: 2103:? By the same argument, if you google just Labels (the generic category rather than the trademark), there are 107,000,000 results. Can you please further clarify your point above. I would really appreciate your help to better my user space pages before reposting and expanding pages that are already live to wikipedia. 1899:

on a controversial subject. I know we maybe don't quite see eye to eye on it, but that's what wiki's about I hope... and don't worry, I won't start creating articles about UFO theories, odd genealogies or anything I think we'll have to quarrel about too hard. Any advice and ideas always welcome. Kind Regards,

2099:

The generic term Dog Chow may have 8500 results, but this stub doesn’t use the generic term, it’s about a corporate trademark—i.e, it’s not about dog chow, it’s about Purina Dog Chow. If you google that, all the corresponding entries are strictly related to the Purina product line—they are not about

1898:

Hi Rees. Just thought I'd say a big thank you for your help tidying and keeping this page in policy check. I see you've been working hard on it and am most grateful for all the input and keeping me in line. I have only created 3 pages for Wiki and am trying hard to keep them within guidelines, albeit

1765:

Yes I have, and that's fine. I suspect, if anyone every reads the main article alone, that they may inadvertently try to edit the apostrophe in or out as preference suits. At least your considered and balanced note may stop a stupid edit war on the matter. As I have already stated, I intend to let

301:

Sorry and thank you for cleaning up the mess I made with the Drink entry ( -_-") Purely unintentionally and I do hope to not get "blacklisted" or negatively marked in any shape or form. I felt like contributing as of late something that WP seemed to lack in conjunction with my recent ventures in the

2311:

Rees11. First, thank you for apologizing for your unprovoked attack on me and for retracting the unsupported charges that you made against me. To be crystal clear, I have no COI. You can do all the reporting that you want. But when it comes back as unfounded and it will, I am going to post that

2145:

Rum towards the start of March, and recently saw that you removed all my additions on the basis of "unsupported by sources", though in fact my research was all done extensively over several months at the University of Washington libraries, and had sources, as well as newspaper articles from reliable

1948:

I have no idea, can't find any good sources, and know little about the subject. If you're talking about the table, it already called them "tablets," I just moved that from the rows up to the column header. The two of you seem to be the experts, and you seem to disagree, so I don't really know how to

1477:

before her death about Aldous and Huston Smith. I have had articles published about themes that include Huxley's writings and even gave a talk before the International Aldous Huxley Symposium held in LA in 2008, sponsored by the Centre for Aldous Huxley Studies at the University of Munster, Germany.

1234:

hey rees, i am one of the co-creators of the closed system drug transfer device page. 'safe handling' sit across from me in the same office. we have been given the task by our bosses to write this page. our brief was to for phaseal to 'own' the closed system drug transfer device term on wikipedia. i

723:

That raises a couple of very interesting questions. The New York Times worked very hard to keep facts about Rohde's kidnapping out of the media, with the intention of denying the Taliban the media coverage it desired and thus helping Rohde's chances of release or escape. The technique obviously paid

900:

I already did that but missed the part about it resolving to mail.seymourduncan.com. I don't think it's outing to track down an IP, which has no expectation of privacy. Thanks for pointing that out. I will note this on COIN, but since the editor hasn't been on in months, I don't think there is much

2351:

post. Someone who opens an account not more than two weeks ago, writes an article on an encyclopedia like it is one for Entertainment Weekly, then gets called on the promotional tone of the whole thing and ends up attacking a "senior experienced editor's" family. Speaks volumes of you as a person,

1472:

For instance, I added information about two audio CDs of lectures given by Aldous Huxley that are commercially available (through Amazon and other online and brick-and-mortar retailers), fully legally licensed from the Vedanta Society of Southern California where the lectures were given, and are a

23:

I redirected the Willard Kennedy page. Please see further comments there. This all touches a bit of a nerve (in a good way) as the "Superman" series was my favorite show when I was a kid, followed closely by "The Lone Ranger", so you can see that I was into good-guy heros as role models (excluding

2315:

As you must be aware by now from various logs, experienced senior editors have rejected your arguments regarding advertising. Your obsession about posting on these issues and reporting anyone who objects to various boards has been noted by other users. As others have pointed out, the fact that

2200:

We do not need to provide a source to prove that his appointment as successor was a surprise. It's common sense, and common knowledge. He was not well known and he didn't hold high office within Nazi Germany. It was well known throughout the Third Reich and abroad, that in case of Hitler's death,

1913:

Thanks for your kind message and encouragement. I could kinda see you had the common sense to see that I am trying to get fully edited, verified, noteable and (perhaps more importantly than I had realised) neutral articles. Thanks again for your assistance with this and help producing what I hope

1476:

I am somewhat of an expert on Huxley, given my own 40 year association with the Vedanta Society of Southern California and having worked closely with Christopher Isherwood, Huston Smith, and other friends and associates of Huxley. I personally conducted a video interview with Laura Huxley shortly

1388:

that I can find that expressly says a person cannot, or should not, be noted by the place of birth, especially when that has been a point of note in later years. In fact, in the article, the year of his US citizenship is cited to a source that does not at all say what year he became a citizen and

777:

and not being contentious. I actually think it's healthy to have COI editors giving a company's POV on talk pages as long as they don't try to own articles. I've said before that I think the most productive articles are the ones that have people with opposing POVs who can work with each other, as

169:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient

2015:

I just noticed your edits to Gallet & Co. Thanks for your help with further toning down the "ad copy" and correcting my silly typos. For a while there, I feared that my hard work of providing a useful encyclopedic reference for fellow enthusiasts would be lost. I realize now that my personal

681:

I am citing two examples of inconsistencies made by various Knowledge (XXG) “Administrators”.as to why the author of this article now prefers its deletion. Some Administrator’s views claim that they cannot count on Google search for examples to bring forth information to back up information in

1389:

actually contradicts other content in the article regarding when he came to live in the US. For Hope, that he was born in England is a salient point that is frequently made. I don't believe MOS says anywhere this is "forbidden", especially when the citations are in error and in my view, citing

688:

In concluding, I request that this article be deleted as to protect who the article was written about from any further manipulative commentary and negative innuendo by Knowledge (XXG) Administrators concerning the article’s content. Other articles about people written by this editor will also

2201:

Heinrich Himmler would have succeeded him as Führer since Himmler was already Reichsführer (a position that was second only to Adolf Hitler within Nazi Germany). So of course Dönitz' appointment was a surprise. A high school senior could even tell you that. However, I did add a reference.

1929:

I don't think that 'tablets' is correct. One is a cylinder, for instance, and are you sure that the group of texts is one tablet? I've been thinking about that for a while but haven't been sure how to put it. There seems to be no way to verify this, which of course is another problem.

346:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 719:

Last week, journalist David Rohde escaped after a seven-month kidnap by the Taliban. It's fabulous news, and it's been partly attributed to the fact that The New York Times suppressed it in the first place. But today we learn that Knowledge (XXG) did so too.

2031:

And thank you for your effort. What at first I feared would be another battle with a spammer has turned in to a valuable contribution from an expert in the field. By the way I'm more of a Hamilton fan myself but appreciate a good watch wherever it's made.

772:

The talk page looks like a mess (the ramblings you mentioned) but I don't think the article itself is in bad shape. I made one small change and brought up a couple of other issues on the talk page for discussion. I'm glad that Zulualpha is going through

2277:

You instincts are likely right, but I am pulling for a Pyrrhic victory. From your point of view, isn't it eerie the guys IMDB and wiki page are so alike? And now I see evidence of sockpuppetry...I just hate self-aggrandizement on this site. It makes me

1997:

I have been reviewing the help pages to understand the proper protocol for removing the associated tags that are still appearing at the top of this article, but am still unsure of how to accomplish this without doing something inappropriate.

1876:

No problem and thanks for pointing that out. I see that the article is very close to a B class so I am going to make a few improvements over the next couple days to bring the article up. Please let me know if you need anything else.

1746:

Thanks for the note. I'll admit I did assume you were clueless and I apologize for that. I'm not a fan of the "google test" but I am sensitive to the spelling preference of the subject. See my comments in the article discussion.

105:. Knowledge (XXG) gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge (XXG), the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an 113:

indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

752:

Call it peacock if you wish. However, the statement of the Sunday Times's lead financial journalist saying "I respect" means that he is "respected," and not just as a matter of semantics, thus it is not unsourced.

2500:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1445:

I am working on a Bio of a living person and Rees11 has deleted some content that may be in violation of wiki guidelines. I have made adjustments to the page and need to know if the changes are satisfactory.

1480:

You flagged the entries about the 2 CD as being spam - but, they are legitimate entries - just as if Harper (Huxley's book publisher) had spotted that one of the Huxley novels was not listed - and added it.

2456:

Hello again! I just thought I'd mention that Kharsag is now being nominated for deletion (and rescue). I would very much appreciate your thoughts and vote on the matter in it's discussion page. Thanks.

342:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

28:

episodes. Yikes! P.S. Your self-promotion of your web page did not escape my intention. Unless you're making money from it, I don't care. But someone else might. Just don't say nobody warned you. :)

2399:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 1214: 2411: 2059:) and would like to know how my entries can be better document and more acceptable. I am working on re-building all listings to my userspace page but, here is an example to get us started: 55:, in an addendum to the small paperback edition, not in the full-sized original edition. Kennedy told Grossman that Charlie Chaplin, of all people, was in the studio when he recorded his 1994:

article to better comply with Conflict of Interest (COI) and Neutral point of view (NPOV) guidelines. As you can see, I have also attempted to do my small part, and will continue do so.

2410:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

921:

I won't miss him. Sure he was a bit entertaining but he was only using Knowledge (XXG) to hype a book full of stupid nonsense and I have little tolerance for complete bollocks.

2084:. Note that although the Dog Chow article does not establish notability, there are over 8500 results from a Google Books search on "dog chow" but none for "Integra Labels". 1160:

I just edited this at the same time as you. You put what I wanted, but the words and figures in the source were a bit off, so I've changed them. I trust that's OK with you.

562:

Hi Rees11, in order to prevent stirring up unnecessary disputes due to my COI status, may I request your help to review the proposed redrafting of the article by BL here:

210:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2312:

fact on all of the pages in question and demonstrate your obsession with reporting anyone that disagrees with you. You have a long documented history of these reports.

703: 627: 173:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

59:

intros and other such stuff, and complimented him on his voice. Now, does that sound like a tall tale, or would it likely be true and be worth including in the article?

1534: 336: 1642: 1275:{{cite book|publisher=Simon and Schuster|title=Lost illusions: American cinema in the shadow of Watergate and ..., Volume 9|author=David A. Cook|page=325}} 685:

Second example is Knowledge (XXG)’s choosing to conceal important news worthy events from the public as cited below and on MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow’s Show”.

1390: 223: 1473:

very valuable resource for any Huxley scholar, student, or fan. They are the only CDs of Huxley's lectures that are available (other then bootlegs).

347: 219: 2244:

have not gone unnoticed. Mine, curiously, were just reverted. We've got one motivated publicist on our hands. Trigger happy indeed. Thanks again.

1722:

Regarding your recent edit here, I did check one of the more reliable reference sources when it comes to album titles, band names etc., that is

1018:

but that is not a general case; it is done under special circumstances as part of a cleanup. I suspect that you spotted the amendment made by

351: 260:. I wrote the section on TTS but silly me, never bothered to see if wp had an article on Linotypes! Some fascinating and amazing stuff there. 239: 137: 713: 589:

word! Thanks for correcting it - my excuse is that it was an incidental edit when I was checking a link from another article, and saw that!

2525: 1393:

as the justification for the change is not valid. For the record, however, I resent the comment you left on my talk page that claims I was

865: 2100:“dog chow”. How do you distinguish Purina’s page about their trademarked non-generic product, from this trademarked non-generic product 1602: 1578: 161: 331:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to

110: 1255: 704:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=new+york+time+wikipedia+rachael+maddow+David+Rohde+&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

170:

information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

2374: 729: 1830: 653: 518: 491: 1030:

but please note on the first one the sentence "Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with

204: 200: 126: 106: 84: 279: 83:

I thought it was really funny that he edited your comment. It was probably so offensive that it was found necessary to ignore the

1420:

I found that info in a contemporary article in The New York Times article on ProQuest. There appears to be some about that time

1364:

If it weren't so poorly written I might think I had somehow landed on the Weekly World News website instead of Knowledge (XXG).

2521: 426: 2080:

I doubt very much that there is any way to create articles for any of these products, because they do not appear to meet the

1823: 1816: 24:

the suicide part of the story, though). To give you an idea of my age, when I started watching "Superman", some of them were

1421: 151: 136:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at 716:

Knowledge (XXG) and 'The New York Times' Suppress Facts to Save Kidnapped Journo BY Kit EatonMon Jun 29, 2009 at 5:15 PM

2335: 1516: 332: 323: 194: 2392: 188: 121: 2168: 1469:

You have edited a number of entries I made, and I'm a little lost about how to properly deal with them. Please help me.

343: 2512:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1638: 623: 282:

doesn't appear accurate. Do you have some (reliable) source that shows that Atria's product wasn't derived from DSEE?

2517: 1779: 1736: 1204: 827:

Crikey, someone knows their whisky... Good spot with the awards though. The standard whisky has won awards though (

652:

Thank you for taking the time to drop me a note of encouragement on my talk page. Appreciate it! Have a great day!

1512: 1034: 1012: 859: 2052:

I added a few brand name stubs back in December and you edited or marked for deletion a number of entries.

1220:

I accept your point (see my latest - and last - comment on the matter on the Monty talk page). My apologies.

530:

has reverted a court evidence citation: first with out reason, then with "unsubstantiated claim" in the edit

2364: 2288: 2249: 1706: 1406: 1282:{{cite book|publisher=Univ of Wisconsin Press|title=The American Film Industry|author=Tino Balio|page=556}} 831:), is it appropriate to mention this? If so, is there a good way to say so without peacocking? Cheers, Luke 758: 2400: 2323: 2156: 1243: 657: 512: 414: 1775: 1732: 1251: 1052: 1002: 890: 714:

http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/kit-eaton/technomix/wikipedia-dabbles-dubious-morals-save-kidnapped-journo

594: 359: 2513: 853: 2462: 2006: 1919: 1904: 1801: 1597: 1573: 1451: 1200: 1184: 1165: 485: 2435:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 1247: 537: 473: 328: 227: 165:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2164: 585:

Isn't it ironic that I altered one spelling mistake, and then created another spelling mistake in the

506: 479: 2440: 2206: 2021: 1968: 1935: 1072: 978: 619: 458: 443: 17: 2489: 2480: 2297:

I can't help noticing that JAWW123 never actually answered the question as to whether he has a COI.

1493: 832: 536:. The document is directly referencing quotations from an email. Your opinion would be appreciated. 418: 2016:

enthusiasm with the subject had somewhat compromised my objectivity. Thanks again for everything...

1727: 1641:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 1508: 1497: 1429: 1139: 1116: 1083: 926: 836: 813: 805: 694: 665: 626:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 571: 422: 2509: 2493: 2327: 1236: 878: 2360: 2284: 2245: 2160: 2104: 2066: 1702: 1527: 1402: 1337: 1124: 1062: 964: 754: 548: 307: 287: 177: 102: 881:. However. If you have a look at the WHOIS, you will see why I think there is a clear breach of 871: 74:

You didn't say anything offensive. One editor is just sensitive to that word. It bugs him a bit,

1634: 1620: 2331: 1882: 1543: 886: 638: 590: 386: 355: 2505: 2497: 1589: 774: 708: 682:

articles in contrast to other Administrators who are pursuing Google search for information.

524: 497: 2458: 2421:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

2108: 2070: 2002: 1915: 1900: 1861: 1844: 1797: 1447: 1351: 1321: 1294: 1180: 1161: 447: 257: 2508:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2501: 2432: 2422: 2415: 2404: 2081: 1616: 1593: 1398: 882: 233: 2436: 2202: 2017: 1964: 1931: 1662: 1547: 1539: 1439: 791: 454: 1991: 885:. I'm not on here much anymore and didn't see the unsigned comment until the other day. 1425: 1132: 1079: 1019: 992: 957: 953: 922: 809: 690: 661: 567: 407: 242:. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. 133: 60: 43: 29: 2391:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

2217: 558:

Request for help to review the proposed re-draft of the article on New Creation Church

87:

to emend it. Have lots of fun and don't take things too seriously. See you around. :)

2425:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

2241: 1892: 1565: 1558: 1221: 544: 303: 283: 265: 1878: 956:

says mergefrom has been replaced by merged-from" - exactly where is that stated by

949: 634: 382: 1949:

move forward. I hope I've been some help but I'll probably have to move on soon.

216:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

2298: 2260: 2221: 2181: 2142: 2119: 2101: 2085: 2060: 2033: 1950: 1856: 1839: 1748: 1726:. All the album sleeves I looked at had the name as Rocket 88's, for example - 1716: 1564:

Hello Rees11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

1484:

Please let me know how my entries can be better documented and more acceptable.

1365: 1342: 1312: 1285: 1094: 902: 733: 243: 88: 38:

I take it you know him from his TV series in Detroit. All I know of him is from

2384: 2118:

Feel free to nominate Dog Chow for deletion if you feel it meets the criteria.

1627: 612: 377:

red link removal was a little bit too fast. It was a formerly-not-so-red link,

2001:

I would be most grateful if you can provide a little guidance in this matter.

1650: 1109: 804:

Nice work updating the article! I went ahead and moved it to its new name at

780: 563: 2319:

You will surely feel compelled to respond, my recommendation is to move on.

446:, I do appreciate it. You're right, it was my mistake. I have apologized to 166: 1568:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 828: 564:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:New_Creation_Church#Making_the_Article_Neutral

450: 2056: 1723: 261: 1588:

Wheat's notability is questionable. You may wish to pursue deletion via

2496:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2450: 2396: 2378: 1385: 1309:

See Icouce's post below yours on my talk and on ]. The mess isn't over.

850:

Hi there. I didn't know whether publishing the result of the WHOIS for

2180:

I'll take a look at it. Please discuss this on the article talk page.

1175:

Yes,I see what you mean about the quote. I've had a go at fixing it,

1648:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --

327:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 2529: 2466: 2444: 2368: 2339: 2306: 2292: 2268: 2253: 2229: 2210: 2189: 2172: 2127: 2112: 2093: 2074: 2025: 2010: 1972: 1958: 1939: 1923: 1914:

will be some excellent articles for Knowledge (XXG) and the world.

1908: 1886: 1865: 1848: 1805: 1783: 1756: 1740: 1710: 1667: 1606: 1582: 1551: 1520: 1501: 1455: 1433: 1410: 1373: 1358: 1328: 1301: 1259: 1224: 1208: 1188: 1169: 1143: 1102: 1087: 930: 910: 894: 840: 817: 794: 762: 741: 698: 669: 642: 633:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

598: 575: 552: 462: 430: 406:

No I am not a bot and sorry about that I did make a mistake on the

390: 363: 311: 291: 269: 246: 91: 63: 46: 32: 442:

Thanks for rubbing my nose in my mistaken reverts in your message

476:. Do you mind weighing in on a Casale Media dispute again? User 184: 117:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2412:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Bloomex (2nd nomination)

1685:

Sorry for your confusion. Will try to follow policy in future.

1237:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qm5Q1qN9L8o&feature=related

147:

Image source problem with Image:Zenith Space Commander 600.jpg

778:

opposed to articles where the editors have no POV at all. --

302:

field of bar tending.... Just wanted to give back a bit.....

2383: 2065:

I look foward to hearing from you and appreciate your help.

1833:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1815: 150: 1215:

Talk:Bernard Montgomery, 1st Viscount Montgomery of Alamein

988:, being placed on the talk page - they are not synonymous. 317:

Fair use rationale for File:Atari BattleZone Screenshot.png

51:

I found the quote I was referring to, from Gary Grossman's

709:

http://www.mediabistro.com/Arianna-Huffington-profile.html

381:

by the not-so-constructive editor. Not panned, just FYI.

1338:

Talk:Uppsala_Mafia#Reliable Sourcing and Verbatim Quotes

1697:

Rather, please make comments on relevant article pages.

1507:

I have addressed some of these concerns at JonMonday's

1394: 1176: 1093:

Sorry, I misunderstood the use of the term "obsolete."

1045: 1041: 1027: 1023: 945: 941: 566:

and provide your comments, if any? Thank you very much!

532: 378: 374: 211: 81: 80:

He considers those that use the word to be "Wii-tards."

78: 75: 2216:

Thank you for adding the source. You may want to read

1123:

seems to be cursor dependent, but I'll cheat and copy

207:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

628:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Susan Singleton

1829:

Message added 02:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC). You can

1694:

Please refrain from adding comment to my talk page.

1633:An article that you have been involved in editing, 974:the merge occurs, being placed on the article; and 618:An article that you have been involved in editing, 350:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 238:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1058:was correct. These two templates are unrelated to 2488:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 472:I noticed you were involved with a discussion on 187:. If you believe the media meets the criteria at 1643:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The Daddy 1990:Thanks for your help with the cleanup of the 1391:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style (biographies) 201:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags#Fair use 8: 1397:. I would appreciate a bit of assumption of 728:You can make article deletion requests at 538:Talk:Casale Media#court evidence reference 438:Responding to your message on my talk page 1822:Hello, Rees11. You have new messages at 1570:G4: Not identical to the deleted version. 1511:. You may want to add to the discussion. 138:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 1688:Honestly I don't understand the trouble. 829:http://www.welsh-whisky.co.uk/16878.html 321:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 183:tag can be used to release it under the 2431:This is an automatic notification by a 2055:I used other stubs as a framework (see 1149:Never mind, saw your edit. C'est la vie 97:License tagging for Image:Brugal pp.jpg 808:. Thanks again for your hard work, — 222:. If the image is copyrighted under a 730:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 2259:I fear it could be a losing battle. 324:File:Atari BattleZone Screenshot.png 205:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 162:Image:Zenith Space Commander 600.jpg 127:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 444:User talk:Wtmitchell#Silly edit war 199:or one of the other tags listed at 1230:Closed system drug transfer device 1199:Thanks for the good feedback here. 410:page thanks for pointing it out. 236:after 20:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 14: 2514:review the candidates' statements 607:AfD nomination of Susan Singleton 256:Thank you for adding the link to 1626: 1048:. Therefore, the initial use of 611: 189:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 122:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy 1680:This strikes me as odd comment. 1078:, and different rules apply. -- 132:This is an automated notice by 2520:. For the Election committee, 2490:Arbitration Committee election 2481:ArbCom elections are now open! 1824:Talk:USS Los Angeles (SSN-688) 1170:14:13, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 1144:00:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 1103:16:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 1088:15:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 931:11:19, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 911:22:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 895:21:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 352:Media copyright questions page 240:Media copyright questions page 1: 2530:13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 1887:16:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC) 1552:09:10, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 1521:06:35, 25 December 2009 (UTC) 1502:19:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 1456:22:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 1411:15:01, 14 November 2009 (UTC) 1395:"trying to start an edit war" 1040:.". Another example: compare 841:14:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 818:17:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 312:02:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 252:Your (minor) edit to teletype 64:03:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 47:03:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 33:02:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 2082:General notability guideline 1866:13:52, 23 January 2010 (UTC) 1849:02:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC) 1806:17:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC) 1784:17:27, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 1757:17:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 1741:14:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 1711:02:33, 11 January 2010 (UTC) 1434:19:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC) 1374:16:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC) 1359:23:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 1329:21:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 1302:20:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 1260:07:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC) 1225:23:30, 16 October 2009 (UTC) 364:01:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 348:criteria for speedy deletion 247:20:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 220:criteria for speedy deletion 92:05:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 2516:and submit your choices on 2405:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 2395:. The nominated article is 1668:19:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 1607:21:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC) 1583:21:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC) 1209:07:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 1189:09:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 660:) 07:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 140:. 19:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 2545: 2522:MediaWiki message delivery 2467:17:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2445:01:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 2401:Knowledge (XXG):Notability 2369:11:37, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 2356:be connected to Hollywood. 2340:03:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 2307:01:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 2293:15:36, 10 April 2010 (UTC) 2269:02:59, 10 April 2010 (UTC) 2254:01:38, 10 April 2010 (UTC) 2211:04:23, 09 April 2010 (UTC) 2190:22:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 2173:18:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 2094:22:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC) 2075:21:32, 29 March 2010 (UTC) 2011:21:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC) 1973:19:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 1963:Ok, thanks for your work. 1959:15:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 1940:15:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 1924:23:11, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 1909:22:10, 22 March 2010 (UTC) 1557:Speedy deletion declined: 795:00:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 391:05:53, 11 April 2009 (UTC) 292:16:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC) 232:the image will be deleted 77:and he thinks it annoying. 2418:with four tildes (~~~~). 2230:11:58, 9 April 2010 (UTC) 2141:I had edited the page on 2128:14:44, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 2113:14:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 2026:18:57, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 940:Re your two recent edits 763:20:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 670:07:54, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 643:19:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 599:14:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 576:10:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC) 335:and edit it to include a 333:the file description page 2302: 2264: 2225: 2185: 2123: 2089: 2037: 1954: 1752: 1369: 1098: 906: 742:11:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 737: 699:06:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 553:17:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 463:00:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 431:23:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 270:22:15, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 228:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use 1401:instead of accusation. 901:to be done about this. 468:Casale Media case again 297:Hurricane entry cleanup 155:Image Copyright problem 2476:Make a comeback mate! 2388: 2149:Thanks for your time! 1820: 1637:, has been listed for 622:, has been listed for 156: 111:image description page 2494:Arbitration Committee 2423:articles for deletion 2387: 1819: 689:hopefully be deleted. 159:Thanks for uploading 154: 101:Thanks for uploading 2414:. Please be sure to 2240:Hi. Your efforts on 1384:There is nothing in 846:Seymour Duncan - COI 748:Clive Fiske Harrison 195:non-free fair use in 191:, use a tag such as 18:Bill Kennedy (actor) 2498:arbitration process 1691:Thanks for comment. 1513:Steamroller Assault 1416:Schenley Industries 806:Imagination Station 275:Apollo, Atria, etcr 103:Image:Brugal pp.jpg 2510:arbitration policy 2416:sign your comments 2389: 1831:remove this notice 1821: 1125:Iberville Projects 676:DELETION REQUESTED 337:fair use rationale 218:, as described on 157: 2343: 2326:comment added by 2176: 2159:comment added by 1776:Derek R Bullamore 1733:Derek R Bullamore 1550: 1263: 1246:comment added by 474:Talk:Casale Media 434: 417:comment added by 2536: 2342: 2320: 2175: 2153: 1992:Gallet & Co. 1834: 1796:You're welcome! 1766:it lie. Regards, 1665: 1659: 1656: 1653: 1630: 1538: 1357: 1354: 1327: 1324: 1300: 1297: 1262: 1240: 1201:RevelationDirect 1141: 1137: 1077: 1071: 1067: 1061: 1057: 1051: 1039: 1033: 1017: 1011: 1007: 1001: 991:I am aware that 983: 977: 969: 963: 876: 875: 856: 789: 786: 783: 615: 535: 529: 528: 509: 502: 501: 482: 448:User:Binksternet 433: 411: 344:my contributions 258:Linotype machine 224:non-free license 198: 182: 176: 53:Serial to Cereal 2544: 2543: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2518:the voting page 2484: 2474: 2472:Make A ComeBack 2454: 2382: 2321: 2238: 2198: 2154: 2136: 2134:Havana Club Rum 2047: 2045:Help with Stubs 1985: 1896: 1874: 1864: 1847: 1835: 1828: 1813: 1794: 1720: 1675: 1663: 1657: 1654: 1651: 1631: 1624: 1605: 1581: 1562: 1531: 1464: 1443: 1440:Ralph Osterhout 1418: 1382: 1352: 1340: 1322: 1310: 1295: 1283: 1269: 1241: 1232: 1222:Stephen Kirrage 1218: 1197: 1156: 1146: 1133: 1131: 1113: 1075: 1069: 1065: 1059: 1055: 1049: 1037: 1035:afd-merged-from 1031: 1015: 1013:afd-merged-from 1009: 1005: 999: 981: 975: 967: 961: 938: 919: 857: 852: 851: 848: 825: 823:Penderyn Whisky 802: 787: 784: 781: 770: 750: 679: 650: 620:Susan Singleton 616: 609: 583: 560: 531: 510: 505: 504: 483: 478: 477: 470: 440: 412: 404: 371: 319: 299: 277: 254: 197:|article name}} 192: 180: 174: 149: 109:applied to the 99: 85:talk guidelines 72: 21: 12: 11: 5: 2542: 2540: 2487: 2483: 2478: 2473: 2470: 2453: 2448: 2381: 2377:nomination of 2372: 2358: 2357: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2272: 2271: 2237: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2197: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2135: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2097: 2096: 2046: 2043: 2042: 2041: 1987:Dear Rees11, 1984: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1943: 1942: 1895: 1890: 1873: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1860: 1843: 1827: 1814: 1812: 1809: 1793: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1760: 1759: 1719: 1714: 1699: 1698: 1695: 1692: 1689: 1686: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1674: 1671: 1625: 1623: 1619:nomination of 1614: 1612: 1610: 1609: 1601: 1577: 1572:Thank you. — 1561: 1555: 1530: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1463: 1460: 1442: 1437: 1417: 1414: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1280: 1279: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1265: 1231: 1228: 1217: 1212: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1159: 1155: 1154:American Samoa 1152: 1151: 1150: 1129: 1112: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1020:User:AnomieBOT 993:User:AnomieBOT 958:User:AnomieBOT 954:User:AnomieBOT 937: 934: 918: 917:Wayne Herschel 915: 914: 913: 854:98.173.201.186 847: 844: 824: 821: 801: 798: 769: 766: 749: 746: 745: 744: 678: 673: 649: 646: 610: 608: 605: 603: 582: 579: 559: 556: 469: 466: 439: 436: 408:Clint Catalyst 403: 402:Clint Catalyst 400: 398: 395: 370: 367: 318: 315: 298: 295: 276: 273: 253: 250: 148: 145: 143: 130: 129: 124: 98: 95: 71: 68: 67: 66: 49: 20: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2541: 2532: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2482: 2479: 2477: 2471: 2469: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2452: 2449: 2447: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2424: 2419: 2417: 2413: 2408: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2386: 2380: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2355: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2295: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2242:Shane Salerno 2235: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2150: 2147: 2144: 2139: 2138:Hi Reese11, 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2063: 2061: 2058: 2053: 2050: 2044: 2039: 2035: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2004: 1999: 1995: 1993: 1988: 1982: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1911: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1894: 1893:Kharsag Epics 1891: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1872:Okane article 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1858: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1832: 1825: 1818: 1810: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1791: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1728: 1725: 1718: 1715: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1703:Calamitybrook 1696: 1693: 1690: 1687: 1684: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1670: 1669: 1666: 1661: 1660: 1646: 1645:. Thank you. 1644: 1640: 1636: 1629: 1622: 1618: 1615: 1613: 1608: 1604: 1599: 1598:Malik Shabazz 1595: 1591: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1580: 1575: 1574:Malik Shabazz 1571: 1567: 1566:Natasha Wheat 1560: 1559:Natasha Wheat 1556: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1536: 1529: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1488: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1467: 1461: 1459: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1441: 1438: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1415: 1413: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1403:Wildhartlivie 1400: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1355: 1349: 1348: 1346: 1339: 1330: 1325: 1319: 1318: 1316: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1298: 1292: 1291: 1289: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1264: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1238: 1229: 1227: 1226: 1223: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1153: 1148: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1138: 1136: 1128: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1111: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1074: 1064: 1054: 1053:afd-mergefrom 1047: 1043: 1036: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1014: 1004: 1003:afd-mergefrom 997: 994: 989: 987: 980: 973: 966: 959: 955: 952:, you state " 951: 947: 943: 935: 933: 932: 928: 924: 916: 912: 908: 904: 899: 898: 897: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 877:would breach 873: 870: 867: 864: 861: 855: 845: 843: 842: 838: 834: 830: 822: 820: 819: 815: 811: 807: 799: 797: 796: 793: 792: 790: 776: 767: 765: 764: 760: 756: 755:Fiskeharrison 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 726: 725: 721: 717: 715: 711: 710: 706: 705: 701: 700: 696: 692: 686: 683: 677: 674: 672: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 647: 645: 644: 640: 636: 631: 630:. Thank you. 629: 625: 621: 614: 606: 604: 601: 600: 596: 592: 588: 581:RMS Lusitania 580: 578: 577: 573: 569: 565: 557: 555: 554: 550: 546: 541: 539: 534: 526: 523: 520: 517: 514: 508: 499: 496: 493: 490: 487: 481: 475: 467: 465: 464: 460: 456: 452: 449: 445: 437: 435: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 409: 401: 399: 396: 393: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 368: 366: 365: 361: 357: 354:. Thank you. 353: 349: 345: 340: 338: 334: 330: 326: 325: 316: 314: 313: 309: 305: 296: 294: 293: 289: 285: 281: 274: 272: 271: 267: 263: 259: 251: 249: 248: 245: 241: 237: 235: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 208: 206: 202: 196: 190: 186: 179: 171: 168: 164: 163: 153: 146: 144: 141: 139: 135: 128: 125: 123: 120: 119: 118: 115: 112: 108: 104: 96: 94: 93: 90: 86: 82: 79: 76: 69: 65: 62: 58: 54: 50: 48: 45: 41: 37: 36: 35: 34: 31: 27: 19: 16: 2485: 2475: 2455: 2429:Please note: 2428: 2427: 2420: 2409: 2390: 2359: 2353: 2348: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2296: 2283: 2239: 2199: 2151: 2148: 2140: 2137: 2098: 2064: 2054: 2051: 2048: 2014: 2000: 1996: 1989: 1986: 1912: 1897: 1875: 1855: 1838: 1836: 1795: 1731: 1721: 1700: 1649: 1647: 1632: 1611: 1569: 1563: 1542: 1532: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1444: 1419: 1383: 1344: 1343: 1335: 1314: 1313: 1287: 1286: 1281: 1274: 1267:Book sources 1248:Brendan tate 1233: 1219: 1198: 1157: 1134: 1130: 1120: 1114: 995: 990: 985: 971: 950:Help:Merging 939: 936:Help:Merging 920: 887:TorstenGuise 868: 862: 849: 826: 803: 779: 771: 751: 722: 718: 712: 707: 702: 687: 684: 680: 675: 651: 632: 617: 602: 591:PhantomSteve 586: 584: 561: 542: 521: 515: 494: 488: 471: 455:Boracay Bill 441: 405: 397: 394: 372: 341: 322: 320: 300: 278: 255: 231: 215: 209: 172: 160: 158: 142: 131: 116: 100: 73: 56: 52: 39: 25: 22: 2459:Paul Bedson 2322:—Preceding 2196:Karl Dönitz 2155:—Preceding 2143:Havana Club 2003:Galletgroup 1916:Paul Bedson 1901:Paul Bedson 1854:And again - 1798:Daniel Case 1717:Mitch Woods 1533:...sent to 1528:Peter Maple 1462:Please Help 1448:Robert94704 1242:—Preceding 1181:Moonraker12 1162:Moonraker12 1115:Mea Culpa, 1073:merged-from 984:is for use 979:merged-from 970:is for use 800:COSI Toledo 654:121.7.42.98 507:12.65.6.135 480:12.64.18.19 413:—Preceding 2506:topic bans 2437:Erwin85Bot 2361:Jim Steele 2352:dude. You 2285:Jim Steele 2246:Jim Steele 2049:Hi Rees11 2018:Time Maven 1965:Dougweller 1932:Dougweller 1792:Vivacoupon 1466:Hi Rees11 1399:good faith 1127:{{coord}}. 1110:Storyville 2502:site bans 1635:The Daddy 1621:The Daddy 1509:talk page 1494:JonMonday 1426:Shortride 1135:WurmWoode 1080:Redrose64 1063:mergefrom 998:replaces 996:sometimes 965:mergefrom 923:Simonm223 879:WP:OUTING 833:Luke.ab09 810:Kralizec! 691:Borismule 662:Tanlipkee 568:Tanlipkee 419:Jacob5539 356:Sasikiran 212:this link 178:GFDL-self 167:copyright 134:OrphanBot 107:image tag 70:offensive 61:Wahkeenah 44:Wahkeenah 30:Wahkeenah 26:first-run 2393:deletion 2336:contribs 2324:unsigned 2203:Veronica 2169:contribs 2157:unsigned 2152:Endoda 2057:Dog Chow 1811:Talkback 1724:Allmusic 1701:Thanks. 1639:deletion 1487:Thanks, 1424:as well. 1380:Bob Hope 1256:contribs 1244:unsigned 1121:get link 866:contribs 624:deletion 545:R.Vinson 519:contribs 492:contribs 427:contribs 415:unsigned 369:Red link 329:fair use 304:Catc1h22 284:Tedickey 234:48 hours 57:Superman 40:Superman 2451:Kharsag 2397:Bloomex 2379:Bloomex 2347:What a 2328:JAWW123 1879:Kumioko 1673:Indents 1544:REDVERS 1386:MOS:BIO 775:WP:COIN 768:Re: YTB 635:Smartse 543:Thanks 533:summary 383:Skarebo 379:damaged 230:) then 2492:. The 2299:Rees11 2261:Rees11 2222:Rees11 2182:Rees11 2161:Endoda 2120:Rees11 2105:Lbuser 2086:Rees11 2067:Lbuser 2034:Rees11 1983:Gallet 1951:Rees11 1749:Rees11 1366:Rees11 1117:Google 1095:Rees11 972:before 903:Rees11 883:WP:COI 734:Rees11 648:Thanks 244:STBotI 203:. See 89:Jecowa 2403:and " 2349:shady 1603:Stalk 1579:Stalk 1347:levse 1317:levse 1290:levse 1195:Guano 1158:Snap! 1119:maps 1044:with 1022:from 1008:with 986:after 872:WHOIS 525:WHOIS 498:WHOIS 453:. -- 226:(per 2526:talk 2463:talk 2441:talk 2407:"). 2365:talk 2354:must 2332:talk 2303:talk 2289:talk 2278:ill. 2265:talk 2250:talk 2236:page 2226:talk 2218:wp:v 2207:talk 2186:talk 2165:talk 2124:talk 2109:talk 2090:talk 2071:talk 2038:talk 2022:talk 2007:talk 1969:talk 1955:talk 1936:talk 1920:talk 1905:talk 1883:talk 1802:talk 1780:talk 1753:talk 1737:talk 1707:talk 1596:. — 1590:PROD 1517:talk 1498:talk 1490:Jon 1452:talk 1430:talk 1422:here 1407:talk 1370:talk 1353:Talk 1336:See 1323:Talk 1296:Talk 1252:talk 1205:talk 1185:talk 1177:thus 1166:talk 1099:talk 1084:talk 1068:and 1046:this 1042:this 1028:this 1024:this 946:here 944:and 942:here 927:talk 907:talk 891:talk 860:talk 837:talk 814:talk 759:talk 738:talk 695:talk 666:talk 658:talk 639:talk 595:talk 587:same 572:talk 549:talk 513:talk 486:talk 459:talk 451:here 423:talk 387:talk 375:this 373:Hi, 360:talk 308:talk 288:talk 280:This 266:talk 185:GFDL 2486:Hi, 2433:bot 2375:AfD 1862:004 1857:MBK 1845:004 1840:MBK 1617:AfD 1594:AfD 1592:or 1535:AfD 1026:to 948:to 262:Jeh 2528:) 2504:, 2465:) 2443:) 2367:) 2338:) 2334:• 2305:) 2291:) 2267:) 2252:) 2228:) 2220:. 2209:) 2188:) 2171:) 2167:• 2126:) 2111:) 2092:) 2073:) 2062:. 2024:) 2009:) 1971:) 1957:) 1938:) 1922:) 1907:) 1885:) 1877:-- 1804:) 1782:) 1755:) 1739:) 1709:) 1655:am 1652:At 1537:. 1519:) 1500:) 1458:) 1454:) 1432:) 1409:) 1372:) 1356:• 1350:• 1341:— 1326:• 1320:• 1311:— 1299:• 1293:• 1284:— 1258:) 1254:• 1207:) 1187:) 1179:. 1168:) 1101:) 1086:) 1076:}} 1070:{{ 1066:}} 1060:{{ 1056:}} 1050:{{ 1038:}} 1032:{{ 1016:}} 1010:{{ 1006:}} 1000:{{ 982:}} 976:{{ 968:}} 962:{{ 960:? 929:) 909:) 893:) 839:) 816:) 785:am 782:At 761:) 753:-- 740:) 732:. 697:) 668:) 641:) 597:) 574:) 551:) 540:. 461:) 429:) 425:• 389:) 362:) 339:. 310:) 290:) 268:) 214:. 193:{{ 181:}} 175:{{ 2524:( 2461:( 2439:( 2363:( 2330:( 2301:( 2287:( 2263:( 2248:( 2224:( 2205:( 2184:( 2163:( 2122:( 2107:( 2088:( 2069:( 2040:) 2036:( 2020:( 2005:( 1967:( 1953:( 1934:( 1918:( 1903:( 1881:( 1837:- 1826:. 1800:( 1778:( 1751:( 1735:( 1705:( 1664:頭 1658:a 1600:/ 1576:/ 1548:⇨ 1540:⇦ 1515:( 1496:( 1450:( 1446:( 1428:( 1405:( 1368:( 1345:R 1315:R 1288:R 1250:( 1203:( 1183:( 1164:( 1097:( 1082:( 925:( 905:( 889:( 874:) 869:· 863:· 858:( 835:( 812:( 788:a 757:( 736:( 693:( 664:( 656:( 637:( 593:( 570:( 547:( 527:) 522:· 516:· 511:( 503:/ 500:) 495:· 489:· 484:( 457:( 421:( 385:( 358:( 306:( 286:( 264:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index