User talk:RexxS/Archive 15 - Knowledge (XXG)

464:

between 150% and 450% more soluble in blood and fast tissues than helium. So if we arrive a medium-deep deco stop on a helium-rich mixture, we will be almost at a critical level of saturation for helium, and it takes something in the order of minutes to unload the controlling tissue sufficiently to ascend as far as the next stop. However, after the gas switch, the helium is coming out of the slower tissues into the faster tissues, while nitrogen is loading the blood and then the fast tissues in the time it takes blood to move from the lungs to the ear (in particular). The amount of nitrogen able to be dissolved into the tissue will be greater than the amount of helium able to be dissolved by a factor of possibly as much as 4. The point where the ICD occurs in this scenario seems to occur when the total inert gas load exceeds a critical value - and it does. I mean that if a tissue can dissolve x amount of helium in the absence of other gases, it can only dissolve less than x in the presence of other inert gases; they interact and many of our theoretical models don't take this into account properly. Stephen Burton's calculation is indeed simplified, but as long as the time taken to saturate the blood with the nitrogen in the lungs is rather less than the time it takes for slower tissues surrounding the ear to lose helium into it, the total gas loading to the ear will increase in the way he states.

1322:

allow you to try on masks until you find one that you're comfortable with. The trick is to move the strap out of the way and place the mask on your face covering your eyes and nose, then breathe in through your nose and hold the breath for a few seconds - if the mask seals properly then it will stay on your face without your hand or the strap to hold it there. You should buy a mask with toughened or tempered glass - in case it ever gets hit and breaks, you don't want slivers of glass going into your eye - but all modern masks have that kind of safety glass in them. Price can be anything from $ 30 up, but there's little to be gained from paying lots. The exception is for old folks like me who need some magnification to see instruments properly, and I pay a bit more for having magnifying lenses in place of plain glass. Here's a

2200:, remember? I eventually gave way and decided it wasn't worth the argument about you forcing your personal preferences onto the article's dates. But when you try to change the guidelines to legitimise your way of doing things at the expense of common sense, I'm going to speak up. Your interactions with John - an editor I respect - have followed the pattern you have displayed every time I've seen you interact with others. Surely you can find it in yourself to debate issues without personalising them? For what it's worth, I'd be happy to discuss your disagreements with my take on tables, as long as we don't have a re-run of the hyphen/sorting debacle, where I have to guess at what your point is. -- 2104:, and I'd be happy to do anything I can to help out. A quick glance shows the article is interesting and well-structured with a decent number of references, so you're well on the way. I'll do a copyedit when I can make some time in the next few days, and also do reference and accessibility check for you. I can see immediately that the two lead images have alt text, but none of the others do. You could improve the accessibility if you can add brief alt text (which would fit in with, but not duplicate the caption) for the others. It's not compulsory for FA, but is worth doing anyway. Cheers, -- 2074:, which I hoped one day to get to featured status. I also mentioned my trepidation of the process and you very kindly offered to have a look over the article, to give it a copyedit. Ok.. well, it has only taken me 6 months to get round to actually fiddling with the damn thing, but I'm much happier with how it looks. I was wondering if you might give look over it as and when you have the opportunity and give me any suggestions? I am hoping to find someone else to do a copyedit too along with a peer review before I approach FAC, I want to have all my bases covered! Thanks in advance 328:, as they all lack scope markup for column and row headers, and few of the editors working on football articles seem to have a grasp of why we do that. I'd recommend stepping away from that mess and working with WFC to get one list through FLC. I'd be happy to help with that, if you wanted. That would give you some leverage to show what is accepted as best practice, and you'd be able to revisit the debate later, in a stronger position to persuade others to sacrifice some of their visual aesthetics for an increase in accessibility for the disadvantaged. Cheers, -- 436:

different time constant for ingassing vs outgassing or for the different gases, which, though quite plausible, is not mentioned in the text as far as I can see, so would constitute OR, synthesis or speculation. The example appears to be assuming instantaneous equilibration for a start, and secondly, the calculated values are both saturation values at that pressure, and therefore unlikely to cause bubble formation. Thirdly, they appear to be amounts, not partial pressures/tensions. Unless I am seriously misanderstanding the logic, there isnt any. Cheers,

1187:

presidency. That's an unfortunate consequence of the way that browsers are free to interpret multiple row spans. Madison's presidency occupies 5 rows in the table and it's really not practical to attempt to force heights onto the rows, so it's difficult to improve on what you see now, particularly when different browsers and screen sizes come into consideration. I'm going to mock up those two presidencies in my sandbox and play around to see if I can better results without risking edit conflicts in your sandbox.

1806: 31: 1293: 1713:(red). There are hybrid forms such as a chorale sung in interaction with a recitative. Compared to the German version, I inserted the column "Gospel", everything in that column (with the one exception of the chorale in the opening chorus) is on Gospel text. - Next year I will probably add on individual movements, as for Messiah, - but for this year, I will have to translate an Easter cantata to German ;) -- 1105: 2032: 651: 1371: 240:'s work and knowledge of the art. It seems to me that my original CSD F4 request was pertinent in needing a source, and now it has one that anyone can see and understand is PD. I see that this is why there is a 7-day time before deletion, but I hope that you understand my desire for sources for the common folk. Thanks for your assistance in this matter.-- 1663:

like † can be used to give the information to blind visitors, but the structure looks so complex that I wouldn't know how to advise you in this case. If you can explain some of the above to me, I'd be happy to see what can be done to make sure that our visually impaired readers don't get left out. Cheers, --

2119:(it does come under my job description!) but for some reason image alts just didn't click. There's a few sentences/topics in there that I'm not 100% certain should be and it may be that a different organisational structure would be better, so if you've got any suggestions please do shout. Thanks again! 1956:

Sorry to bother you, but I'm really hesitant as to whether to attend tomorrow as it's quite unclear exactly what is happening and when and who should be involved in what. I can't attend in the evening in any case - what time would you expect "ordinary" wikipedians to turn up - is it 12 noon or 1pm?

1613:

That's a beautiful article. I hope you don't mind, I've tweaked the table very slightly (nothing much that is visible) but it should improve the accessibility a little, and I've taken the opportunity to replace old-fashioned cell attributes for centring with the more modern css styling, as that's one

1305:

nearby, in which I like to dive a bit. What brand/kind of diving mask would you recommend? I am probably not going snorkeling (I'm too phobic for that breathing stick and am terrified of breathing in water) and this is purely recreational. My chances of getting attacked by sharks are as close to zero

817:

template to update it to our current standards, and I'm wary about alienating the regulars at FAC because of perceptions of "accessibility hurdles" that take time to adjust to - you know that better than I do! It is worth regularly reminding folks, though, that the visually-impaired in particular can

642:

Hehe - I already have the T-shirt for the idea, but it's well worthwhile pursuing. The concept of spreading existing A-class expertise to multiple other wikiprojects makes eminent sense, and ought to help fill that gap between GA and FA while hopefully reducing the load on FA reviewers by having much

493:

Is there anything else you can spot that is missing from the article, or anything that needs more explanation? I never know just how much explanation is necessary, and it is less work to underdo it and wait for someone to ask for more. Some nice photos would be great, but I don't have any. However if

347:

first place because one such article was failing FAC (on MOS:FLAG violation, not more general accessibility issues). I can't think of anything list-y that would help, all-time roster lists etc already use wikitables with scope markup for rows and columns, and have done for some time. Thanks again for

875:

Malleus, I look forward immensely to meeting you again soon. If I could somehow arrange to meet up with Bishonen, Giano and Geogre, that would the gig of a lifetime. Back to reality, see if you can persuade Parrot to make a meeting – we're plotting to arrange a wikimeet somewhere in the Nottingham –

787:

Hi RexxS. In my "spare time" I'm going through FACs trying to ensure that any ACCESS and technical issues that are commonplace at FLC are noted. I was wondering what you felt about the "track listing" table in the subject article? I'm not asking you to comment on the FAC unless you're happy to do

760:

Hi Dana, thanks for the reminder, and sorry I've been on wikibreak for the last few weeks. I'm really pleased with how you and TRM have worked together to improve the accessibility of the article, and I'm sure that visually-impaired visitors will have a much better experience there as a result. I've

463:

Taking the last two together points to a fast-tissue hit. The differential diffusion rates of He and N2 can't explain this. However, blood actually does equilibrate almost instantaneously (within seconds) when passing through the lungs, and that's why I quoted the solubilities: nitrogen is somewhere

1628:

Thank you! I first looked for your changes the wrong place, St. Matthew Passion, then found them in Messiah, sorry for the confusion. If you have time, I would appreciate a look at the other also. (Needless to say, there's also Messiah structure, Part I and Part III. I don't have time right now but

1388:

Hello RexxS. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Knowledge (XXG), in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The

1343:

Thanks! After I dropped this note here, I remembered that I have a Facebook friend, and he said the exact same thing (about straps and breath and whatnot). I was going to buy something online, but now I see I should get something at a real-life store where I can try them. Feel free to come by; it's

1253:

Ok - I finally managed to re-construct the two presidencies so that Clinton spans as far as the end of the 6th term (1808 election). Of course, Madison's presidency now takes up rather more height (with 3 VPs during his second term), but that's what we'd expect. Nevertheless, I suspect that when TK

235:

The information on the specific image does help, yes. But, I completely understand the justification of PD of photos taken of 2d art. I also understand that it defers to the copyright of the original image. I just stick with the idea that I am an average person and if I cannot easily see the proof

149:

Thanks Peter for that. My French is far more conversational than technical, but it certainly seems to me that you've made a good job of the translations from the source. I've tweaked the text to try to turn fragments into sentences, and to explain the GERS acronym, but otherwise I'm sure it's fine.

2118:

I know, I know. I feel gutted to have missed them, however having recently bought a house to do up, most of my weekends are full. I will make sure I wander over to Manchester or Liverpool as soon as I can. I'll get the alt text done for the images today, I'm normally pretty good with accessibility

1459:

To further explain, because I probably wasn't clear: I have seen CFD's on user categories before, where once it was voted to be deleted, users were forced, on threat of blocking, to remove the redlinked category from their user page as well. In other words, if it gets CFD'd, I can't go back to the

1268:

I think that change looks better, but is less accurate -- the first vacancy was at the end of Madison's first term. I'm going to keep it, for now, though, and I did the same for Calhoun's vice-presidency, which also spanned two presidencies. Thanks again, it was driving me crazy trying to figure

1059:

No, it won't affect the accessibility for screen readers, etc. in the slightest. They would never see those colours anyway, and all of the information in the table is available in text or by accessible symbols. What PresN has done is to disguise the row headers to look like normal data cells, in a

400:

Hi TRM, to be honest, that's such an overwhelmingly common use of the endash (or any sort of dash) in tables, both inside and outside of Knowledge (XXG), that I'd have very little doubt that visitors would understand the meaning. The key is probably "icing on the cake" in that respect. Whenever we

1662:

Just imagine for a moment that you are blind, but have a device that can read web pages to you. If that device read the introduction and then the table to you, would you be able to tell which parts are Gospel, which Recitative, and so on? Normally, either the text of the table or some sort of key

832:

Hi RexxS, no worries, hope you're well. Thanks for taking the time out to check the table, I'm doing what I can at FLC (we seem quite good at most access issues there now!) and suddenly noted the plethora of FACs that pass with tables, lists etc that all need work in that area. Also, thanks for

578:

Hi Peter, sorry I've not replied sooner, but I've been taking a three week wiki-break as I was feeling rather jaded with the place, and I've found that a short break helps to revive my enthusiasm. I've done a little clean-up at Don Shirley and commented on the talk page. In brief, I think that an

1321:

As diving masks all perform the same function, I really have no preference for brand. All you need is one that seals well enough not to leak (which forces you to keep on clearing the water out). If you go to a reputable dive shop and tell them what you want to do, any decent member of staff will

1186:

Hi, Coemgenus, I hope you don't mind, but as it's easier to show than to explain, I've made the change to make George Clinton span another row. You'll see that because of the number of rowspans in the following presidency, it gets 'compressed' so that it hardly appears to overlap into Madison's

489:

Doolette and Mitchell make much more sense. A model doesn't have to be true, but it should be plausible and give plausible results. If it is just a curve fit or a kludge it is fine to say so, but not good to pretend it is something else. Anyway, I have put in a bit from D&M, and the Burton

435:

I have a problem with using this part of the reference as I don't follow the argument. That means I can't paraphrase an explanation. I don't see the relevance of the differences in solubility in different tissue types. the only way I could see this working is if the same physical tissue has a

1474:

Well, I seem to spend enough of my time defending little personal things that are important to me that I reckon I'm up for defending the odd category. In any case, there's no point in being half-hearted about it – I want to see all Wikipedians in that category and a good fight would be great

323:

Sorry for the delay, that's a huge discussion. I've skimmed over it, but I wouldn't know where to start in making an input. There are so many confused ideas there that I suspect it will take a very long time before any consensus could be reached. None of the templates I've looked at meet the

579:

argument could be made for the notability either way, and more sources are really needed. The purpose of the tag is to attract other editors, so if nobody else shows up to add to the discussion, I'd recommend removing it after a while, but you should use your own judgement on that. Cheers --

1768:

Thanks! For looking harder, for the offer (but the pieces are composed as a sequence, don't need to be sortable) and most of all for the line "I'll just remind folks that ArbCom fiat does not make policy, the community does." Happy Easter (see my user for more, the Passion is now hidden),

448:

Well, as Gene once said to me, we don't understand the actual mechanism of any type of DCS, we just know that it's something to do with bubbles. Explanations are all speculation, it's just that the commoner types have had more speculation about them. Here's what I think we know about ICD:

2015:

Thanks, Si, and I hope your alcohol allowance is raised again soon. We had to look up what the word "undisputed" means, and it turns out you're right. The meeting place was a huge success, by the way, and we had a part of the pub to ourselves. Looking forward to seeing you soon. Cheers,

1009:

Brilliant. See you at the board meeting. Anyone is welcome at our meetings. Also you offered help with MonmouthpediA .... we can use all the help we can muster. This is going to be an amazingly important project.... but we have set high targets and help is important now - I'll email.

307:

and partly on accessibility grounds. I wonder if you might possibly find time to have a look at the discussion, and if there's anything you could add or clarify on questions of accessibility, your input would be appreciated. I'm afraid the discussion does ramble on a bit..... cheers,

2180:

What are you doing, RexxS? You suddenly appear out of nowhere, and your comments are at least in part off-topic. Why are you getting involved? Is it not possible to agree to disagree? I disagree with a number of your table preferences, but I have not bothered you about that, have I?

1238:

Thanks, Rexx, that's exactly what I wanted to do. I didn't know about that scope business before, but it seems to be what I was missing. I appreciate the help! I'll let you know when I'm getting near to submitting it for FL, after those other changes you mentioned. Thanks again,

1060:

similar way to what "plainrowheaders" does, but resetting the background colour as well. It's a lot of effort for a merely decorative visual effect, but that doesn't matter much if it means we get accessible tables without alienating those who set such great store in appearances.

2250:

and saw your 2010 interaction with Gimmetoo. So he has been doing this for years, then. It's hard for me to understand why someone would get such a majorly disruptive bee in their bonnet over such an apparently minor thing. Thank you for the nice comment above also. Take care,

1749:

Ok - I've looked harder. I'm obviously not 100% right now as I missed the text description explaining the S A T B. I think I can relate each use of colour to a piece of text, so it passes the accessibility test of not conveying information solely by colour. The same applies to

1063:

More importantly, I should say that for a screen reader, the best row header would of course be the title of the novel, as the year doesn't uniquely identify which row the reader is on - and that's the whole point of bothering to mark up row headers. Oh well, hope that helps,

1527:

Bish and Giano aren't universally appreciated, as you obviously know, but they are by most editors who don't keep their heads down the toilets of AN/I and its ilk. As for categories though, I've always thought them to be almost Stone Age and have never bothered with them.

742: 172:

Public Domain or not, I requested CSD F4 because there is no source. Who took the photo of the art, or who made the art, etc, etc. I guess I need some more understanding about why it is required to have source on some images, but not on others. Thanks for your time. --

2334:

table as best as I can, and I've tried to do it in steps with edit summaries that you can follow. Do you want to try the other tables yourself (and I'll check them afterwards for you), or would you like me to do them as well for you (won't be until tomorrow)? Cheers,

1170:. The problem is in the Vice President column. A few rows from the top, you'll see George Clinton. I wanted to extend his cell down into the next row, but adding to the "rowspan" parameter doesn't do anything. I'd be grateful for any tips you might have. Thanks, 1223:

Please revert any or all of those that you don't want - or if you leave them, I donate those edits into the public domain, so you don't need to attribute me when updating the main article. I'll report back if I make any progress with those rowspans. Cheers,

425:: "But there's another mechanism at work that confounds that simple explanation. The solubility of nitrogen is 150% that of helium in water and 450% that of helium in lipids. This means that despite the different diffusion rates, an isobaric He -: --> 1935:

I've made a few comments, Peter, and I'm sorry to be so negative, but that article is a real disaster and the thing it desperately needs is sources. I'm very happy though that you want to clean it up, so please don't let me put you off. Cheers,

197:

that the artwork is over 100 years old or sufficient enough to be PD? It is not uncommon for art to be recreated years, decades or centuries of iconic persons after they have passed. I just don't feel comfortable with out a source. Sorry. --

855:

I really enjoyed talking with you today, and all the others whose Knowledge (XXG) names I will inevitably forget, so apologies to them, but my memory for names is frankly crap. I was made to feel really welcome, something I didn't expect.

382: 1701:"The choirs are abbreviated Ch I and Ch II, individual voice parts as S (soprano), A (alto), T (tenor) and B (bass). Both choirs are four-part, SATB." This precedes the line on the soliloquents. The soliloquents are within the 923:

I hope you had a really great time, James. Do upload them to Commons if you're happy to release them under CC 3.0. There are other editors who will identify species, so don't worry about that, and you can always drop a note at

1041: 401:

want to make sure that the meaning is understood, a good recommendation is to put the key before the main table, but this isn't one of those cases where I think it would make much difference. I'll drop a note into the FLC. --

1044:. The user has included the row scopes but he has used colour to obscure the shading of the column that occurs when they are used. Was wondering if this ok and if it has any effect on the accessibility of the table, cheers. 137:, using Google translate, my own vestigial understanding of French, and a lot of intuition/background knowledge/guesswork. I would appreciate if you would take a look and make sure I haven't made any obvious errors. Cheers, 1389:

survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

426:

N2 switch can temporarily increase the *total* inert gas load beyond the critical level and produce bubbles. You have to remember in mixed-gas diving that it's the total gas load that counts. There's a worked example at

342:

Thanks for taking the trouble to look at it at all. Thing is, the specific focus of the problem was on the template(s) used in the current squad section of football club articles: the template became problematic in the

2218:

And as long as we don't have you calling my statements "patently untrue", when they were correct? Ok, RexxS, I invite you to discuss on my talk page about whatever. Given the comment below, I won't reply here further.

540:

Hey Yaris - good to see you again yesterday and sorry I didn't find more time to chat. I had a look at that tool and it certainly seems useful for examining IP contributions, so I'll get a copy for future use. Thanks

2283: 1754:, and you can see how many extra columns there are in that list to convey the other information. If you are interested in making your tables sortable, I'll have a look at what would be sensible for that as well. -- 1300:

RexxS, thank you for your help; it's greatly appreciated. Now, I have another question for you, well outside of the scope of Malleus's talk page. You're a scuba diver, and I have a swimming pool, not to mention a

470:

Nevertheless, I do accept that the mechanism I'm describing is not well described in the good quality sources. The best is by David Doolette and Simon Mitchell. I see that the full text is now available at

246: 218: 204: 179: 1689:

Let's see what I can do this late (my end of the world), can continue tomorrow. Thanks for noticing that I failed to switch the NBA-BWV in Part II, the German has it the other way round, but I consulted

896:

Hey Rexx Just finished a week of diving in Zanzibar and got some great pictures. Are these sorts of images needed on Knowledge (XXG) do you know? I am not sure the official names of everything I say. --

1651:

and I was able to set the appropriate column scope for each part. However, I simply don't understand the colours as I can't fit them to a textual description. Part of the problem is things like this:

241: 199: 174: 685: 374:

has noted that if this "key" doesn't appear until the end of the table, it's not actually very useful. My gut instinct is that we'd need some kind of alt text with the en-dashes, or a key

872:

I can confirm to any talk-page watchers that Malleus is even more entertaining in real life than on wiki, as well as being simultaneously jovial and thoughtful – a rare combination indeed.

979:

No. Just a couple of cold, murky quarries that we use for training. All the real diving takes place at the coast. Coincidentally, Coventry is generally reckoned to be the place in the UK

467:

I assume it's the same sort of effect that we observe when first giving 100% O2 to a casualty with joint pains; it's often reported that the symptoms transiently worsen before improving.

370:

Hey RexxS, many of the discog tables have a "key" at the end which simply explains what an en-dash means (usually that a release wasn't made in a particular territory or didn't chart).

565:. I dont think notability has been established, but another user does. Also there is a provocative quote from the only secondary source and I am unsure of how to deal with it. Cheers, 2316:

ready for the weekend launch! I've just had a quick look at the article and the FLC - I'll spend some time tomorrow on anything that can improve the accessibility for you. Cheers, --

1254:

adds the events to each presidency they will 'fatten up' anyway so that Madison won't look so different. Anyway, feel free to use it or not, depending on which you prefer. Cheers, --

1135: 804: 1818:

Thank you for looking in detail at the aspects of complicated tables, improving their accessability and clarity, and for wise words concerning the spirit within the project, --

600: 475:

so it's probably worth reading that in full, as you may find it matches my commentary sufficiently well for you to be able to write something for the article. Cheers, --

734: 2100:

Hey WTT, good to hear from you again; you've missed some great meetups, but I guess you've been busy. Anyway, I'm really pleased that you're getting stuck into

1405:

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated

490:

advice, as that is claimed to be effective in practice, but I am not going to try to explain how he gets it as it looks to me like he has left something out.

236:

that it is PD (ie knowing for sure that the original artwork is in fact out of copyright), I feel that others may not be able to either. I applaud your and

1891: 833:

revisiting the Michigan FLC, once we got past that tricky coding thing, it all went swimmingly! Cheers for now (and expect more pleas in due course!!)

114:

article... Could you please expand some on the Marine Nationale 90 tables to replace the "citation needed" tag. I don't speak French and noticed you do.

929: 803:

Hi TRM. Sorry I've been away from editing for a short while. You're absolutely right to raise those concerns, and I've left a couple of comments at the

788:

so, but I see a number of albums at FAC and wanted to get some good advice on how their templates align with ACCESS. Hope you're well, all the best,

1133:, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 1329:

I envy your location, having dived the Gulf just once, so I'll send my regards to you from the chilly West Midlands, 5 °C (41 °F) today. Cheers, --

643:

better prepared articles nominated. I'm on a busy schedule of wiki-meets (as you can see below). Maybe I should make a userbox something like this:

1506: 1163: 1129: 452:

The symptoms of ICD when switching from a helium-rich, nitrogen-lean mix to a helium-lean, nitrogen-rich mix during a deco stop are well reported.

2312:

Hi Matthew, there's no problem asking me here. I'm sorry I've not responded sooner, but I've spent the last two days in Monmouth working to get

1659:

as I don't understand the (B), (A), etc. Are they baritone, alto, etc? or a key to something else? How do they relate to "Chorale S" or "Rec A"?

1916: 1140: 270: 1406: 1475:

publicity. If we could just tell Bish and Giano how much they are appreciated, it might just be enough to coax them back. I live in hope. --

656:

This user believes that meeting other editors in the flesh makes it far less likely that they will be treated like a pile of dogshit online.

1345: 1307: 925: 1591: 704: 1511:

I was right about CFD, you appear to have been right about publicity (now up to 10 people). Prognosticators without equal, we are. --

2358:

I gave the other tables a shot, I hope I've done it correctly. If you could please check it over, I'm afraid I've missed something.

1502: 1922:

Hi RexxS, I would appreciate your input on some changes I am considering for the format and possibly name of this article. Cheers,

1705:, they do not need to be distinguished. Different colours were used by the German author for the comments of individual singers on 2156:, which is fully protected. A quick check of sources shows no problems, but I'll do a more thorough check before you go to FAC. -- 1996:

I am sorry to have missed the bash, but I'll drink to your good health and longevity when I am allowed to drink again. I've seen

1344:

about three, four hours to the Gulf. Our pool is at 76 °F (24 °C) today; I think the Gulf is already warmer than that... Thanks,

1162:

I had a question about formatting a table, and you were recommended as someone with expertise in that area. I'm trying to work

287: 277: 1654:"Soliloquents are Judas (B), Peter (B), two witnesses (A T), two high priests (B), two maids (S), Pilate (B), his wife (S)." 379: 1394: 1837: 1648: 1587: 1498: 966: 909: 1437:

I was slightly afraid of this when I linked to it. I fear that by bluelinking that category, you will soon bring the

1037: 431:- not a great source (!) but there's little doubt that the effect is observed regularly. Delete me when finished :) " 297: 1190:

If you're going for FL, then the table needs row & column headers marked up and scoped for accessibility (as in

2391: 2135: 2090: 1691: 1532: 1520: 860: 838: 793: 390: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 38: 2145: 1114: 1349: 1311: 970: 913: 1167: 700: 608: 2051: 2269: 1899: 1859: 1845: 1823: 1774: 1740: 1718: 1638: 1603: 1416: 422: 134: 111: 2070:

Hey RexxS. If you cast you mind back a few months to a dingy pub in Liverpool, I mentioned an article on

939:

at the recent Coventry meetup and I'm looking forward to meeting you in Coventry at the end of August! --

562: 520: 2387: 2279: 2153: 2120: 2075: 1926: 1751: 1731:, translated from the same editor, with background colours, that one is sortable. - Would you follow me 1728: 1630: 1529: 1516: 1465: 1449: 1015: 857: 834: 789: 750: 569: 498: 440: 386: 141: 115: 2349:

Excellent, thanks for breaking that down! It makes a whole lot of sense when you do it step by step.

123: 2368: 2301: 2247: 1274: 1244: 1175: 2290: 2224: 2186: 1727:

The cantata is in my Spielwiese (meadow to play on - equivalent to sandbox). I realized there is

1695: 1148: 811: 743:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured list candidates/List of National Historic Landmarks in Michigan/archive1

691: 604: 530: 353: 313: 1805: 523:. It's a new tool for finding out stuff about IP addresses in ranges, from the maker of STiki. 293:

family (or possibly something similar to the less widely used flag-compliant version example at

876:

Sheffield – Leeds triangle in the near future if that's any more convenient for him. Cheers, --

2149: 1895: 1855: 1841: 1819: 1770: 1736: 1714: 1709:(two colours, recitatives and arias), comments in free chorus on text by Picander (blue), and 1634: 1599: 1563: 1411: 869:

It was a real pleasure chatting with you (and Iridescent – two of my five heroes in one day!).

745:

have been addressed. Would you mind returning to see if you have further comments? Thank you,

633: 621: 428: 1441:

down upon it. When it was redlinked, it wasn't really a category, and no one could complain.

1191: 325: 2293:

issues, per The Rambling Man's suggestion. I've tried to fix it up best I could by reading

2047: 2005: 1923: 1512: 1461: 1445: 1085: 1049: 1011: 962: 905: 746: 715: 566: 495: 437: 138: 1438: 781: 684:

Good to met you - twice! - this weekend. I've only now made the connection between you and

348:

having a look: wish I'd asked you sooner, before it got so confusing and confused. cheers,

2340: 2321: 2205: 2161: 2109: 2021: 1981: 1941: 1883: 1873: 1759: 1668: 1619: 1595: 1545: 1480: 1334: 1292: 1259: 1229: 1069: 988: 944: 881: 823: 766: 723: 667: 584: 546: 480: 406: 333: 237: 226: 155: 119: 47: 17: 1997: 2256: 2197: 1302: 1270: 1240: 1171: 371: 118:

should be a good one. (If you like it, I'll request an English translation). Thanks --

2313: 2220: 2182: 1973: 1962: 1144: 1028:

is going to be very exciting. Get involved (cos your mum is going to read about it).

1025: 1003: 526: 349: 309: 718:? or the next Coventry? I'll make sure I get to buy you a pint as well ;) Cheers, -- 2043: 1559: 1104: 936: 629: 472: 2144:

I see that Demiurge is going to do a copyedit for you; that's good. I've modified

2031: 818:

benefit from incorporating accessibility best practice. Keep up the great work! --

1614:

more job that won't need to be done at some point in the future. Best regards, --

1558:! Red Cat to Blue Cat! I'm gonna drop the hammer down! Watch out for smokeys! -- 2395: 2373: 2344: 2325: 2306: 2260: 2228: 2209: 2190: 2165: 2139: 2113: 2094: 2055: 2025: 2009: 2001: 1985: 1966: 1945: 1929: 1903: 1877: 1863: 1849: 1827: 1778: 1763: 1744: 1722: 1672: 1642: 1623: 1607: 1567: 1549: 1535: 1484: 1469: 1453: 1422: 1353: 1338: 1326:

offering prescriptions should you need them (it's in GBP because I'm in the UK).

1315: 1263: 1248: 1233: 1179: 1152: 1117: 1089: 1081: 1073: 1053: 1045: 1019: 992: 974: 954: 948: 917: 897: 885: 863: 842: 827: 797: 770: 754: 727: 708: 671: 637: 612: 588: 572: 550: 534: 501: 484: 443: 410: 394: 357: 337: 317: 254: 230: 212: 187: 159: 144: 127: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1194:), so I've done that for you, in case you were not familiar with the technique. 494:

there is any reasonable graphic that would help I can have a go at it. Cheers,

2336: 2317: 2201: 2157: 2105: 2017: 1977: 1937: 1869: 1755: 1664: 1615: 1541: 1476: 1330: 1255: 1225: 1166:

up to FL, but my chart/table skills are limited. The draft is in my sandbox,

1065: 984: 940: 877: 819: 762: 719: 663: 580: 542: 476: 402: 329: 222: 151: 1594:

me to you as the best in tables. It will be on the Main page soon. - I wrote

2252: 2000:- "undisputed", it says on the wall. Is that a first for Knowledge (XXG)? - 1629:

could probably handle those following the example.) I wrote He was despised

1306:

as one can get. I need something that seals well and is affordable. Thanks!

650: 599:

Evening! Pleasure to see you again today, here's the link if you need it -

1216:

markup President's name as row header, add scope and remove excess bolding

2101: 2071: 2064: 1958: 1555: 304: 1554:

When I saw this section header, I thought y'all had got yourselves some

1197:

Here are the the diffs of my edits so you can see what I did each time:

2294: 1370: 1887: 455:

It's often manifested in the inner ear - vertigo, nausea, vomiting.

2030: 1291: 777: 269:

Hello, and sorry to bother you. There's an ongoing discussion at

2278:

Sorry about the abrupt contact, but your name was brought up by

1732: 271:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Football#Watford current squad

25: 1323: 106:

French Navy - Marine Nationale 90 (MN90) decompression tables

1369: 1130:

Category:Wikipedians who wish Bish and Giano would come back

1124:

Category:Wikipedians who wish Bish and Giano would come back

1103: 649: 429:

http://www.scubaengineer.com/isobaric_counter_diffusion.htm

385:. As ever, your input is much appreciated and respected. 2046:) is arguably the most disputed result in boxing history. 953:

Great should be fun. Any good diving around your area? --

2297:, but I can't actually check to see if my fixes worked. 265:

Discussion of football squad templates, re accessibility

1698:(who is blind), both responded on my talk (link above). 1586:

Did you know that I translated the structure of Bach's

1400:

Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

1215: 1208: 1201: 2042:

The irony, of course, is that that particular fight (

1111:

HI, Rexx; all done except for the thanks. Take care.

807:. Unfortunately it will require modifications to the 714:We'll meet up again soon; I'm sure of that - maybe 601:

User:SalopianJames/Sandbox/Central A-class proposal

1080:Ok, thanks for your input Rexx, much appreciated. 688:. Had I realised, I would have bought you a pint! 273:about the replacement of the existing widely used 219:User talk:ТимофейЛееСуда#File:William Congreve.png 2289:I was wondering if you could check this page for 761:added a note of my support to the FLC. Cheers, -- 618:What? Meeting in real-life to embiggen the wiki? 1202:George Clinton spanned into Madison's presidency 741:Hi RexxS - I think that all of your comments at 628:You might be interested in this idea by Maunus. 519:I thought you might be interested to know about 473:http://jap.physiology.org/content/94/6/2145.long 378:each table. It's with particular regard to the 1974:User talk:Deb#First Monmouth Meetup on Saturday 1886:and my Bach cantata mentioning an approach for 1444:And yes, I wish Geogre would come back too. -- 1036:Hi Rexx, got a quick question about rowscopes. 735:List of National Historic Landmarks in Michigan 2148:to improve its accessibility, and I've asked 930:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Tree of Life 805:WP:Featured article candidates/Faryl/archive1 133:RexxS, I have used the reference to write up 8: 1957:And how does the "meet-up" part of it work? 283:family of templates by the wikitable-like 110:RexxS, If you get a few minutes for the 1868:That is good news indeed. Thank you. -- 1164:List of Presidents of the United States 926:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Fishes 2152:to help sort out the related issue at 1917:List of diving hazards and precautions 1647:I've straightened out the colspans in 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7: 1840:is now in decent black and white. -- 2367:Thank you so much for doing this. ~ 1694:about this, about the colours also 1497:. OK, me wait, see what happen. -- 561:Hi RexxS, Could you take a look at 1489:T-RexxS no Bishzilla, but T-RexxS 24: 1854:First miracle, top of my talk, -- 1296:This may already be too advanced. 557:Notability of Don Shirley (diver) 1804: 1365: 29: 1540:Hehe. 15 now. Can't grumble. -- 380:Eric B. & Rakim discography 1209:column scope to column headers 1: 1890:are featured together on the 1024:But anyone reading this..... 886:19:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 864:20:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 843:19:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 828:19:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 798:17:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 771:19:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 755:18:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 728:19:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 709:13:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 672:17:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 638:04:36, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 613:20:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC) 589:17:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 573:07:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 551:17:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 2386:RexxS, as ever, my thanks. 2284:featured list candidate page 1649:St Matthew Passion structure 535:21:24, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 502:20:09, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 485:18:09, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 444:08:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 411:21:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 395:19:08, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 358:22:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 338:03:35, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 318:16:29, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 255:03:43, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 231:03:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 213:02:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 188:02:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 160:23:35, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 145:08:24, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 135:a section on the MN90 tables 128:16:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 2146:Template:Infobox UK feature 2035:Black Sheep is watching you 1882:Continued: on this day his 1303:more exciting body of water 1269:out how to make it work. -- 1038:Nebula Award for Best Novel 2416: 2196:We had this discussion on 2114:23:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC) 2095:11:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC) 2056:14:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC) 2026:00:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC) 2010:21:18, 28 April 2012 (UTC) 1986:16:35, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 1967:13:59, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 1946:15:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC) 1930:10:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC) 1904:12:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 1878:15:41, 16 April 2012 (UTC) 1864:13:49, 15 April 2012 (UTC) 1850:22:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC) 1118:12:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 1090:11:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 1074:23:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 1054:22:43, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 993:18:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 975:04:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 421:Hi RexxS, Your comment in 168::File:William Congreve.png 2332:De-orbited space stations 2044:Holyfield–Lewis March '99 1828:11:32, 9 April 2012 (UTC) 1803: 1779:23:49, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 1764:19:28, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 1745:15:38, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 1723:22:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 1673:21:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 1643:21:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 1624:20:48, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 1608:07:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 1568:18:30, 8 April 2012 (UTC) 1550:18:13, 8 April 2012 (UTC) 1536:23:01, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 1521:21:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 1507:23:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 1485:22:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 1470:22:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 1454:22:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 1423:23:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 1362:Dispute resolution survey 1354:23:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC) 1339:23:14, 3 April 2012 (UTC) 1316:20:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC) 1264:17:50, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 1249:16:32, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 1234:16:09, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 1180:11:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 1153:14:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 1141:Categories for discussion 1020:10:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 949:17:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 918:10:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 521:Knowledge (XXG):WikiAudit 417:Isobaric counterdiffusion 303:), partly to comply with 2396:19:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 2374:18:56, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 2345:18:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 2326:23:02, 16 May 2012 (UTC) 2307:01:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 892:Pictures of aquatic life 2261:11:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 2229:22:05, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 2210:18:40, 6 May 2012 (UTC) 2191:06:01, 6 May 2012 (UTC) 2166:16:29, 4 May 2012 (UTC) 2140:07:28, 1 May 2012 (UTC) 935:By the way, I spoke to 2330:Update: I've done the 2270:List of space stations 2036: 1499:Floquenstein's monster 1374: 1297: 1108: 654: 622:User talk:Alarbus#Idea 423:Decompression (diving) 288:Football squad player2 112:Decompression (diving) 2280:User:The Rambling Man 2154:Template:Location map 2034: 1812:passionate dedication 1752:List of Bach cantatas 1493:anyway. Hell hounds 1379:Dispute Resolution – 1373: 1295: 1107: 653: 278:Football squad player 42:of past discussions. 1136:the category's entry 1040:is currently at FLC 686:hlist implementation 2300:Thanks in advance ~ 2248:Talk:Ursula Andress 1433:Red cat to blue cat 1324:typical online shop 716:m:Meetup/Monmouth/1 563:Don Shirley (diver) 458:Its onset is quick. 2037: 1588:St Matthew Passion 1375: 1298: 1109: 983:from any coast. -- 655: 298:Boca Juniors squad 2246:Wow, I just read 1924:Peter (Southwood) 1833: 1832: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1143:page. Thank you. 1100:A kitten for you! 932:to let them know. 567:Peter (Southwood) 496:Peter (Southwood) 438:Peter (Southwood) 193:Also, how do you 139:Peter (Southwood) 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2407: 2388:The Rambling Man 2371: 2304: 2133: 2129: 2128: 2088: 2084: 2083: 1952:Monmouth meet-up 1808: 1801: 1800: 1707:text by Picander 1703:Gospel narration 1692:Michael Bednarek 1631:missing a friend 1421: 1419: 1414: 1404: 1366: 1218: 1211: 1204: 959: 902: 835:The Rambling Man 816: 810: 790:The Rambling Man 707: 698: 694: 387:The Rambling Man 324:requirements of 302: 296: 292: 286: 282: 276: 250: 217:I've replied at 208: 183: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2415: 2414: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2369: 2302: 2282:on this list's 2273: 2178: 2131: 2122: 2121: 2086: 2077: 2076: 2068: 1994: 1954: 1920: 1884:Easter egg tree 1799: 1596:He was despised 1592:friend referred 1584: 1435: 1417: 1412: 1410: 1397:to participate. 1384: 1364: 1290: 1214: 1207: 1200: 1160: 1126: 1102: 1034: 1007: 955: 898: 894: 853: 814: 808: 785: 739: 696: 690: 689: 682: 657: 597: 559: 514: 419: 368: 300: 294: 290: 284: 280: 274: 267: 248: 206: 181: 170: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 18:User talk:RexxS 12: 11: 5: 2413: 2411: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2370:Matthewrbowker 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2328: 2303:Matthewrbowker 2272: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2240: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2198:Ursula Andress 2177: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2067: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2029: 2028: 1993: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1953: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1919: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1831: 1830: 1815: 1814: 1809: 1798: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1699: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1660: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1583: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1460:way it was. -- 1439:hounds of hell 1434: 1431: 1428: 1427: 1402: 1399: 1386: 1377: 1363: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1346:207.157.121.92 1327: 1308:207.157.121.92 1289: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1212: 1205: 1195: 1188: 1159: 1156: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1101: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1061: 1033: 1030: 1006: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 933: 893: 890: 889: 888: 873: 870: 852: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 784: 775: 774: 773: 738: 732: 731: 730: 681: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 662:Any takers? -- 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 626: 625: 624: 596: 593: 592: 591: 558: 555: 554: 553: 513: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 491: 468: 465: 461: 460: 459: 456: 453: 418: 415: 414: 413: 372:User:Goodraise 367: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 266: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 169: 166: 165: 164: 163: 162: 116:This reference 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2412: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2375: 2372: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2333: 2329: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2314:Monmouthpedia 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2305: 2298: 2296: 2292: 2287: 2285: 2281: 2276: 2275:Hi, RexxS! 2271: 2268: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2249: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2175: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2137: 2130: 2127: 2126: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2085: 2082: 2081: 2073: 2066: 2063: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2033: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1927: 1925: 1918: 1915: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1838:Passion table 1835: 1834: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1813: 1810: 1807: 1802: 1796: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1729:one more list 1726: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1697: 1693: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1661: 1658: 1653: 1652: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1598:last year, -- 1597: 1593: 1589: 1581: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1442: 1440: 1432: 1426: 1424: 1420: 1415: 1408: 1407:research page 1401: 1398: 1396: 1393:Please click 1390: 1385: 1383: 1382: 1381:Survey Invite 1372: 1368: 1367: 1361: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1325: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1304: 1294: 1287: 1276: 1272: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1222: 1217: 1213: 1210: 1206: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1196: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1157: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1132: 1131: 1123: 1121: 1119: 1116: 1112: 1106: 1099: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1031: 1029: 1027: 1026:Monmouthpedia 1022: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1005: 1004:MonmouthpediA 1002: 994: 990: 986: 982: 978: 977: 976: 972: 968: 964: 960: 958: 952: 951: 950: 946: 942: 938: 934: 931: 927: 922: 921: 920: 919: 915: 911: 907: 903: 901: 891: 887: 883: 879: 874: 871: 868: 867: 866: 865: 862: 859: 850: 844: 840: 836: 831: 830: 829: 825: 821: 813: 806: 802: 801: 800: 799: 795: 791: 783: 779: 776: 772: 768: 764: 759: 758: 757: 756: 752: 748: 744: 736: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 712: 711: 710: 706: 702: 697:Pigsonthewing 693: 687: 679: 673: 669: 665: 661: 660: 659: 658: 652: 641: 640: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 620: 619: 617: 616: 615: 614: 610: 606: 605:SalopianJames 602: 594: 590: 586: 582: 577: 576: 575: 574: 570: 568: 564: 556: 552: 548: 544: 539: 538: 537: 536: 532: 528: 524: 522: 517: 511: 503: 499: 497: 492: 488: 487: 486: 482: 478: 474: 469: 466: 462: 457: 454: 451: 450: 447: 446: 445: 441: 439: 434: 433: 432: 430: 424: 416: 412: 408: 404: 399: 398: 397: 396: 392: 388: 384: 381: 377: 373: 365: 359: 355: 351: 346: 341: 340: 339: 335: 331: 327: 322: 321: 320: 319: 315: 311: 306: 299: 289: 279: 272: 264: 256: 252: 251: 245: 244: 239: 234: 233: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 215: 214: 210: 209: 203: 202: 196: 192: 191: 190: 189: 185: 184: 178: 177: 167: 161: 157: 153: 148: 147: 146: 142: 140: 136: 132: 131: 130: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2331: 2299: 2288: 2277: 2274: 2239: 2179: 2150:Plastikspork 2124: 2123: 2079: 2078: 2069: 1995: 1955: 1921: 1896:Gerda Arendt 1856:Gerda Arendt 1842:Gerda Arendt 1820:Gerda Arendt 1811: 1771:Gerda Arendt 1737:Gerda Arendt 1715:Gerda Arendt 1710: 1706: 1702: 1635:Gerda Arendt 1600:Gerda Arendt 1585: 1494: 1490: 1443: 1436: 1403: 1392: 1391: 1387: 1380: 1378: 1376: 1299: 1161: 1158:Chart advice 1134: 1128: 1127: 1113: 1110: 1035: 1023: 1008: 980: 956: 899: 895: 854: 786: 740: 705:Andy's edits 701:Talk to Andy 692:Andy Mabbett 683: 598: 560: 525: 518: 515: 420: 375: 369: 344: 268: 247: 242: 221:. Cheers, -- 205: 200: 194: 180: 175: 171: 109: 78: 43: 37: 2048:Black Sheep 1972:Replied at 1894:, enjoy! -- 1590:from de. A 1513:Floquenbeam 1462:Floquenbeam 1446:Floquenbeam 1288:Some advice 1012:Victuallers 851:Just a note 747:Dana boomer 36:This is an 1998:this photo 1032:row scopes 516:Hi RexxS, 366:Discog key 238:Nikkimaria 150:Cheers, -- 120:Gene Hobbs 98:Archive 20 90:Archive 17 85:Archive 16 79:Archive 15 73:Archive 14 68:Archive 13 60:Archive 10 2291:WP:ACCESS 1892:Main page 1556:CB radios 1271:Coemgenus 1241:Coemgenus 1172:Coemgenus 957:Doc James 900:Doc James 812:tracklist 512:WikiAudit 2221:Gimmetoo 2183:Gimmetoo 2102:Doom Bar 2072:Doom Bar 2065:Doom Bar 1797:Precious 1711:chorales 1696:Graham87 1533:Fatuorum 1145:Pichpich 981:furthest 967:contribs 910:contribs 861:Fatuorum 595:WikiMeet 527:Yaris678 350:Struway2 310:Struway2 305:MOS:FLAG 2295:MOS:DTT 1582:Passion 1530:Malleus 1192:WP:DTAB 1139:on the 937:Sharkli 858:Malleus 630:Alarbus 326:WP:DTAB 249:ЛееСуда 243:Тимофей 207:ЛееСуда 201:Тимофей 182:ЛееСуда 176:Тимофей 39:archive 2002:Sitush 1560:Dianna 1413:Steven 1082:NapHit 1046:NapHit 782:WP:FAC 376:before 2337:RexxS 2318:RexxS 2202:RexxS 2176:Query 2158:RexxS 2106:RexxS 2018:RexxS 1978:RexxS 1938:RexxS 1888:peace 1870:RexxS 1756:RexxS 1665:RexxS 1616:RexxS 1542:RexxS 1477:RexxS 1418:Zhang 1331:RexxS 1256:RexxS 1226:RexxS 1066:RexxS 985:RexxS 971:email 941:RexxS 914:email 878:RexxS 820:RexxS 778:Faryl 763:RexxS 720:RexxS 680:hlist 664:RexxS 581:RexxS 543:RexxS 477:RexxS 403:RexxS 330:RexxS 223:RexxS 152:RexxS 16:< 2392:talk 2341:talk 2322:talk 2257:talk 2253:John 2225:talk 2206:talk 2187:talk 2162:talk 2136:talk 2125:Worm 2110:talk 2091:talk 2080:Worm 2052:talk 2022:talk 2006:talk 1992:60th 1982:talk 1976:. -- 1963:talk 1942:talk 1900:talk 1874:talk 1860:talk 1846:talk 1836:The 1824:talk 1775:talk 1760:talk 1741:talk 1735:? -- 1733:here 1719:talk 1669:talk 1639:talk 1633:. -- 1620:talk 1604:talk 1564:talk 1546:talk 1517:talk 1503:talk 1491:good 1481:talk 1466:talk 1450:talk 1395:HERE 1350:talk 1335:talk 1312:talk 1275:talk 1260:talk 1245:talk 1230:talk 1176:talk 1168:here 1149:talk 1115:Buck 1086:talk 1070:talk 1050:talk 1042:here 1016:talk 989:talk 963:talk 945:talk 906:talk 882:talk 839:talk 824:talk 794:talk 767:talk 751:talk 724:talk 668:talk 634:talk 609:talk 585:talk 547:talk 531:talk 481:talk 407:talk 391:talk 354:talk 345:very 334:talk 314:talk 227:talk 195:know 156:talk 124:talk 1959:Deb 1495:bad 928:or 780:at 737:FLC 699:); 383:FLC 253:. 211:. 186:. 2394:) 2343:) 2335:-- 2324:) 2286:. 2259:) 2251:-- 2227:) 2208:) 2189:) 2164:) 2138:) 2112:) 2093:) 2054:) 2024:) 2016:-- 2008:) 1984:) 1965:) 1944:) 1936:-- 1928:: 1902:) 1876:) 1862:) 1848:) 1826:) 1777:) 1769:-- 1762:) 1743:) 1721:) 1671:) 1641:) 1622:) 1606:) 1566:) 1548:) 1519:) 1505:) 1483:) 1468:) 1452:) 1409:. 1352:) 1337:) 1314:) 1262:) 1247:) 1232:) 1224:-- 1182:. 1178:) 1151:) 1088:) 1072:) 1064:-- 1052:) 1018:) 991:) 973:) 969:· 965:· 947:) 916:) 912:· 908:· 884:) 841:) 826:) 815:}} 809:{{ 796:) 769:) 753:) 726:) 703:; 670:) 636:) 611:) 603:. 587:) 571:: 549:) 541:-- 533:) 500:: 483:) 442:: 409:) 393:) 356:) 336:) 316:) 301:}} 295:{{ 291:}} 285:{{ 281:}} 275:{{ 229:) 158:) 143:: 126:) 94:→ 64:← 2390:( 2339:( 2320:( 2255:( 2223:( 2204:( 2185:( 2160:( 2134:( 2132:· 2108:( 2089:( 2087:· 2050:( 2020:( 2004:( 1980:( 1961:( 1940:( 1898:( 1872:( 1858:( 1844:( 1822:( 1773:( 1758:( 1739:( 1717:( 1667:( 1637:( 1618:( 1602:( 1562:( 1544:( 1515:( 1501:( 1479:( 1464:( 1448:( 1348:( 1333:( 1310:( 1277:) 1273:( 1258:( 1243:( 1228:( 1174:( 1147:( 1084:( 1068:( 1048:( 1014:( 987:( 961:( 943:( 904:( 880:( 837:( 822:( 792:( 765:( 749:( 722:( 695:( 666:( 632:( 607:( 583:( 545:( 529:( 479:( 405:( 389:( 352:( 332:( 312:( 225:( 154:( 122:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index