1148:
I first got introduced to Ayn Rand non-fiction about 1974, and ever since then I knew that genus-differentia definitions had to play a prominent role in the language. I may have had some notion of context at that time, because Ayn Rand made some remarks to the effect that context was all of your previous knowledge. But that was too vague. It was many years before I got the idea of a list of propositions. Aha!!! I just remembered that I came up with that idea during W3C emails -- probably would be about Nov 2002 and later. I developed the idea in the context of a "knowledge diary" -- write down all your knowledge everyday in a diary, and the context is all the things you wrote down before today. The W3C crowd didn't seem very impressed, but for me that was clear validation of the idea that context was a list of propositions. I invented the "knowledge diary" to have a simple explanation of context for W3C people -- that didn't work, but it worked for me. By the way, RDF & OWL still have only a very crude notion of context -- essentially that a particular file of RDF/OWL statements is a context. Even though that says to me, file = list of propositions = context, I don't remember anyone at W3C talking about lists of propositions.
1162:, and in the download file KEHOME/download/knowledge.zip -- contains 10+ years of thoughts, experiments, notes, other related theories, simple applications of mKE, etc. Usually, I put a date on every file, so you can tell what time period it came from. Sometimes, I left in a whole string of dates which corresponded to the times when I updated the file. There is one link from the main webpage, I think labeled "MKE applications", which goes to a second page, which has links to the more significant applications -- among all those things that I experimented with over the years.
400:
those examples "major features". They're too low level for that. The best term I can think of at the moment is "basic features". There are only 3 features worthy of being called "major features". A reasonable approach would be for the Lead to advertise a brief discussion of major features, followed by basic features. I have no problem discussing neutrality & notability. I suggest we tackle neutrality first, 'cause that should be the easiest. I'm emailing myself a copy of this. I will copy it onto
Rhmccullough talk page. Dick McCullough email:
1827:
806:
95:
1035:. By the way, the email group is "KR" instead of "MKR" because I started the group before I changed the name. For the earlier days of mKR, mKE, I just saved the more significant emails on my website & download. They're still there in the same place: KEHOME/kenews. By the way, I think the number of archived emails at Yahoo is close to 500.
399:
We're never going to connect by sticking to Wiki pages. What time zone are you in? I'm in
California (UTC - 8:00), and I'm having so much trouble sleeping, I can "meet" in the middle of my night if you just tell me when. I'll mention it now, so you can think about it. I made a serious booboo calling
1565:
Hi! I was wondering if you could give me a pointer or two for a computer program I'm toying with; if I have a set of relations (subject-predicate-object triples) and some information about the implications of those relations, is there a more efficient way of figuring out the implied relations other
1406:
It's kind of too bad userfying this wasn't done sooner- it could have saved all kinds of silliness and drama. Anyway, Knowledge (XXG) isn't going to change its sourcing standards, but if more sources emerge over time, this may become usable yet. I still heavily encourage you to start covering this
1365:
Let me explain this to you, Mr. McCullough. The MfD was closed, ultimately, with a Delete decision. That might be reviewed, possibly, but Friday moved the
Sources page to your user space. I will request a copy of the deleted article and it's Talk page, for my user space. It will be easier to improve
1147:
Opening a new section here, to keep the edits from getting out of hand. Grey Knight -- I was thinking languages very early, even wrote one memo at Bell Labs in 1970s. But at that time, I was thinking things like SNOBOL patterns for matching language -- completely different from mKR today. However,
1082:
is probably the closest to this for mKR, as even though it was written by you it was at least passed by the editor. If you can find some writeups by third parties saying something like "Hey, there's a language called mKR, it's good/bad/ugly" then you should get somewhere (note that the opinion they
1069:
Let me clarify what we're looking for. Most of what you list above would be helpful for expanding the article, but what's being looked for right now are a few "foundational" references that justify, not any given statement in the
Knowledge (XXG) article, but the existence of it in the encyclopaedia
930:
PS. I hope you don't get scared off or offended by this whole ugly AFD process. You seem like you have the expertise required to be a good contributor on various other articles here. Some of these ideas on verifiability and original research are here to protect
Knowledge (XXG) from advertisers and
68:
No such convention. In fact, it's rather irritating, when trying to follow a discussion, to have to pop back and forth across user pages.... most long-time users, as far as I've seen, reply in place. When one edits a page, it automatically is added to the
Watchlist, so one knows easily when there is
1369:
In other words, this isn't bad news. If we were unable to improve the article sufficiently by the time another AfD came, and one would, because some of these people are like bulldogs, they don't let go, usually, then it would have been deleted anyway, and the process of improving it would have been
1003:
late 2002, I started working with W3C crowd, soon changed to MKR, MKE to avoid confusion. There are 100s of emails at W3C in that era. Also, in that time frame, MKE was available from CNET download.com, plus some others which I don't recall -- I can root through my notes for stuff like that, but
1488:
The article, from one point of view, is coming along nicely. It is now a better introduction to MKR. However, it still has, of course, sourcing problems. I will recommend, I think, that you place a copy of this article on your web page. It will then be usable as a source for what the author of MKR
1020:
One completely different tack. Before I retired (Bell Labs 1960-1984, AT&T Network
Systems 1984-1989) I played around with hierarchies & language. I don't think the language was much like mKR at that time. What I did was more like playing with toys. I don't think there was anything very
1151:
Incidentally, RDF/OWL entity-characteristic-proposition hierarchies have very serious problems. First off, they don't even have entities. Their class is a little bit like an entity, but they confuse that class with the set of all classes. I told them that many times, but they never seem to get
907:
The AFD may be too close to call. There is one reasonable argument for deletion: the lack of significant coverage in third-party sources. This is our general standard for inclusion of topics. There are good reasons for this- it helps us ensure neutrality, among other things. But regardless of
1758:
on that basis. This seems like it might work, although I'm concerned that more complex relationships might get missed. I'll try to look at it formally and see what I can come up with. I already had an idea for improving the speed of lookups for "implied" relations by maintaining an index of
1582:, is there a better way than to brute-force produce a "complete" list of relations and then start hunting through it for the target?). This was bugging me a while ago, and I just went to look at it again. I recalled that you had done some work in this field, so thought I'd ask. Thanks! --
1502:
I encouraged you to edit the article at this point without regard to notability or verifiability, to simply make it the best article you could write if (1) you were still required to use
Neutral Point of View, but (2) you could use your own experience and knowledge as sources -- but not for
1443:
Friday and I disagreed about a great deal in the AfD, but he's right about this. Cover the topic on
Wikiversity. It's a better environment for the kind of thing you do, you'll be able to do more than could ever be done on Knowledge (XXG) (at least under present conditions, and probably
1498:
Theoretically, it shouldn't make any difference, but if the article, when it first goes back, is tight and fully referenced to independent sources, it will politically be more likely to be successful. Then more marginal sources can be used to flesh it out, appropriately handled.
1366:
the article in user space, because a user can revert changes in their user space, generally, without limit, allowing defense against any attempts to disrupt the editing. As long as the article is reasonably being prepared for return to article space, it can remain in user space.
1503:"opinions," unless, of course, they are stated as such. "In the opinion of R. H. McCullough, MKR is the greatest thing since sliced bread." You wouldn't say that, of course, unless somehow the relationship of MKR and bread were to become notable.... The more neutral the better.
1016:
In the early years, I traded a lot of emails with a couple of friends, discussing syntax & meaning & use of mKR. But I don't expect any of those to be archived anywhere. I probably talked about mKR in some other email groups, but again nothing pops into my head at the
1390:
Abd, I am happy with what you propose. I could recreate what I would like in the article very quickly. Then I would welcome any suggestions from you. I have one question for you, already. Should I include
Winograd & Iwanska in the history, or just forget about that?
916:
appropriate. They don't have the kind of "no original research" rule that Knowledge (XXG) has. Even if the article is kept at Knowledge (XXG), someone might radically shorten it to only what they consider verifiable information. At Wikiversity, this problem won't exist.
1370:
more difficult, with certain editors seeing and removing any source that they suspect, and they will apply rigorous standards not necessarily appropriate for the article. So it could be a constant battle. When we get the article ready to go back, we would probably go to
1683:
You can program all of that into the "meaning" of a relation, so that it uses all info. available at the time. If new info. becomces available, you can re-execute the same "meaning" after the fact. Anything after the fact will have some "brute force" flavor to it.
632:
I'd like to ask you another question - to get out in the open now - I have designed mKR so as to be able to say anything (which Ayn Rand would say) about concept formation, axiomatic concepts, etc. Do you think that's in the same category as "user-friendly"???
978:(not sure if the latter is applicable, but have a glance anyway). On another note, are there any sources from back when it was called KR/KE ? Searching for "KR language" is a bit unproductive since, as you probably know, that's a generic term. Any ideas? --
1121:
Later, I did put a few of the Yahoo emails in KEHOME/krnews, but clearly, Yahoo is the best place to look for the later emails. If you get to looking at any of the W3C emails, you can tell when I was active, because you'll see a sudden flurry of emails by me.
1794:
Yes, I'd like to know how things turn out. Re: more efficient Unicon programs. The mKE genealogy application has 3 relations whose meanings are implemented in Unicon instead of mKR. Look at KEHOME/src/birth.icn, KEHOME/src/child.icn, KEHOME/src/marry.icn.
912:. I don't know why I didn't think of this before. Wikiversity is a sister project to Knowledge (XXG), but instead of being an encyclopedia, it's a general-purpose educational resource. The scope is much wider than Knowledge (XXG). There, tutorials
1374:
and ask for the deletion decision to be reversed, based on the new article, and DRV will then decide what to do. Or we will simply recreate the article, and see if it gets AfD'd then, depends on how long we take. The latter can often be less fuss.
485:
Tags like 'user friendly' are considered peacock terms here on Knowledge (XXG), and can't really be placed on an article unless you have a reliable third party source stating so. Claiming that it's English like and hence user-friendly constitutes
821:
604:
I'm definitely striving to stay unbiased & objective. I just did not understand this whole approach to assessing "user-friendly". I asked several times what people meant about a user-friendly Citation. I just didn't get it then.
1317:
648:
My focus was on Rand a lot, because those very abstract topics are hard to discuss. But beyond Rand, the objective is really to say anything about anything - because mKR is a general purpose knowledge representation language.
1602:
mKR associates a "meaning" with every relation; this meaning is a "method" which you can program to do whatever is appropriate in your context. For your example: Bob rel Mother = Alice; Bob has gender = Male; Alice rel Son
1424:
I already did that -- several days ago. But I haven't done anything significant at Wikiversity, because I've been spending all my time here at Knowledge (XXG). I appreciate your attitude, and your advice. Thanks.
1664:, could a program (mKE or something else suitably programmed) process a large set of such relationships efficiently? Or is brute force "run through the list and keep adding anything new you find" the only way? --
1184:
A brief addendum, before I settled on context = list of propositions, I believe I was thinking context = ECP hierarchy, which is almost the same thing. I think I was using context = ECP hierarchy for many years.
931:
cranks. You sure don't seem to me like an advertiser or a crank; you seem like a guy with legitimate knowledge to contribute, who is doing a very good job of doing it neutrally. This is part of why I suggest
850:
It seems fairly likely that the article on mKR will be deleted, for want of sources. However there are other Wikis out there where this content would be more welcome. In particular, wikinfo.org specifically
722:
Yes, it definitely gets into AI area. Again, I say to myself "mKR is a general purpose knowledge representation language". Do you think that's another thing I'm not supposed to say -- like user-friendly?
1128:
is putting together a complete mKR Sources page, which may contain unreliable & self-referencing sources. I don't understand the politics or methodology here, but he seems to think it will help.
1234:
that says something to the effect of "I am User:Rhmccullough on the English Knowledge (XXG)." ? I don't think anyone really doubts it's you, but as you may have gathered we try to be thorough.
69:
a response there (at least that is the default Preference setting). Sometimes users will pop a note on the other user's talk that they have responded, which then generates the message notice. --
667:
You should answer on my talk page. That way, I can get back to you sooner. Anyway, from my limited programming experience, what you have outlined, borders on Artificial Intelligence. -
588:
Yes, when it becomes notable enough someone will add that point. I would also like to point out that since you created the language, adding terms like 'user-friendly' might show a
1328:
during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -
1238:
I guess if you want you could write it as "Dr McCullough has Knowledge (XXG) username = Rhmccullough;" (I've been reading some of your documentation as you can see!). --
1258:(This doesn't get any special privileges or anything — it might just come in handy if it turns out to matter whether you're the real deal at some point in the future) --
203:
I would suggest reading some of our notability and neutral point of view policies before going any further. Hopefully, we can work together to improve the article. -
824:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
1879:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
1495:
We will still need proof of notability from independent sources before the article, by then edited to meet verifiability standards, can go back into article space.
136:
I am well aware of that policy. What has irritated me is the "underconstruction" aspect. My edits were being deleted while I was in the middle of entering them.
429:: the examples section strays from the topic and does not belong on Knowledge (XXG). You will also need a citation if you are going to call it user-friendly. -
740:
That statement seems fine. However the mKR article seems to have too much of technical jargon. Please keep the average user in mind when writing the article.
1656:
do these things based on a description? And how is that coded behind the scenes? For instance, from the example above, if I can explain to a program that
1852:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
1070:
at all. In most cases, the "acid test" for this is an independent writeup of some kind by somebody not associated with the subject matter; for example,
291:
Your "Examples Cleanup" on 22:14 20 Jun completely destroyed the meaning of that section & needs "Undo" <<<<<<<<<<<
684:
1158:
I should have mentioned -- there is another source -- which will require some fortitude to go through. KEHOME/knowledge/rhm, which is available at
971:
346:
I could wait no longer for someone who has "retired" and may never make good on his offer to improve mKR article. I performed the "Undo" myself.
21:
The Afd debate ends only when a consensus is achieved (i.e when a majority is seen after a certain time period). You'll have to wait till then. -
1013:. I also own domains mKRmKE.net, mKRmKE.com -- but haven't used them much. All 3 domains are currently hosted at the same site - with GoDaddy.
1566:
than brute-force running over the list and adding in every new triple that can be found? Perhaps there is a simpler method at least for a
592:, and cause editors to claim you are being promotional about your language. You'd best try to be as unbiased and objective as possible. -
1848:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
1465:
it's going to die. But it might take quite a while.... Knowledge (XXG) has, effectively, for the moment, painted itself into a corner.--
1708:
In mKR, if you're that concerned about efficiency, then you implement the meaning in the Unicon language, instead of the mKR language.
1010:
Early last year, names changed to mKR, mKE. website changed to mKRmKE.org (although I have a backup site). email address changed to
1492:
The article on Knowledge (XXG) might be quite a bit more brief, with reference to what is on the MKR web site for more information.
487:
52:
Cheers mate. Were all here to help. By the way, I cleaned up your talk page a bit. Also, the general convention is to reply on the
1350:
1325:
1309:
1303:
546:
C++ is regarded as a middle-level language, as it comprises a combination of both high-level and low-level language features
1769:
1674:
1592:
1267:
1247:
1104:
987:
1482:
817:
1842:
1820:
1340:
1075:
441:
387:
215:
126:
304:
If you will just talk to me, I will explain the problem <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
1448:). As to Knowledge (XXG) and sources, the existing sources, all collected together in a coherent and clean article
1332:
1165:
I've finally run down. I'm online here a lot. But if you want to get in touch with me the surest method is email:
433:
379:
207:
174:
2. You never discussed your edits with me -- they completely contradict the editorial directions of my last editor.
118:
1155:
At the moment, I can't think of any other memorable events which would guide your search for historical records.
458:) 13:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC) To my naive way of thinking, it's obviously user-friendly because it's English-like.
908:
whether this article is kept in Knowledge (XXG), I wanted to encourage you to write about it at wikiversity.org
820:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
813:
688:
680:
574:
It's funny, because the whole time I was designing mKR, I told myself I was designing a user-friendly language.
419:
111:
107:
1521:
I will be happy to place a copy of this article on my web page. Should I mention Knowledge (XXG) in some form?
507:
1091:, but something more than a blog will be nice if you can get one. Let me know if you want more explanation (
397:
copy of email From: Rhmccullough To: Diligent Terrier Subject: working together on mKR (programming language)
1506:
Let me know when you think the article is ready for a first review, just on the question of how it reads. --
836:
1880:
1316:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
1004:
may not come up with much. Website in that time frame is probably rhm.cdepot.net and my email address was
745:
edit conflicts occur when someone edits and saves the page while you're still in the process of editing it.
1032:
yet evolved to today's form. There's a lot documentation of the changes in mKR & mKE after I started
1849:
1199:
Oops -- there's my engineering intuition fuzzing things up again. mKR says at view = v { ... }; v is the
102:. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Knowledge (XXG). However, please know that editors
1761:
1759:
relations by their predicates; I'll let you know how things turn out, if you're interested. Thanks! --
1666:
1584:
1329:
1259:
1239:
1096:
979:
430:
376:
204:
115:
110:. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the
1000:
Now for names: 1997 Icon Newsletter, I unfortunately said kr, ke. Probably changed to KR, KE very soon.
997:
Thanks for the Wiki stuff. I'll look at them. I do account & copy of mKR article at Wikiuniversity.
1627:
If the gender info. is only available after the Mother info., then you need to do something like this:
855:
original research. There might be some wikis specifically devoted to programming languages, also.
687:. This will help you get a better picture of Knowledge (XXG) policies, and will help you better the
171:
1. You ignored my "underconstruction" sign, deleting everything that I spent the morning working on.
1891:
1079:
1883:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
1838:
832:
1796:
1709:
1685:
1639:
1546:
1525:
1426:
1392:
1285:
1208:
1186:
1171:
1129:
1044:
1043:
Enough stream of consciousness. Can I tell you something more specific which would help you?
953:
869:
780:
724:
709:
650:
634:
606:
575:
561:
523:
471:
459:
451:
404:
347:
305:
244:
178:
151:
137:
35:
779:
Edit conflict - I gather there are no guarantees to prevent that. Thanks again. Good night.
168:
Now I am really unhappy with you, Diligent Terrier. A fine mess you made before you retire.
1415:
1357:
943:
921:
859:
560:
I understand now. So -- maybe some day someone (else) will write that mKR is user-friendly.
1834:
1652:
I understand that mKR can do this, but what I meant was, is there any part of mKE that can
1371:
1321:
1313:
589:
103:
450:
ok. Let's start with "user-friendly". What kind of Citation are you talking about here?
1606:
If the gender info. is available before the Mother info., you can do something like this:
1543:
I linked to the article, and put under the title "prepared for Knowledge (XXG), the 💕".
1540:
I hope this is okay. On my web page, I added a section entitled "Why did I invent mKR?"
1071:
1887:
1411:
different there, and your original research will be welcome rather than problematic.
1511:
1470:
1380:
1021:
significant. But I probably wrote a few quick & dirty memos for my office mates.
895:
827:
74:
822:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/MKR (programming language) (2nd nomination)
99:
1412:
1354:
1166:
1033:
1011:
1005:
940:
918:
856:
401:
1318:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Talk:MKR (programming language)/Sources
1088:
805:
536:
It was meant to highlight how to cite sources on a programming language.Yes, C
1734:
So you mean that "entailed" new relations should be added as we go along? So
1083:
express needn't be entirely positive; you only need to establish that someone
1087:, the Knowledge (XXG) article will be balanced and neutral anyway). I found
240:
Let's begin with the worst error: mKR:Major features: The brief examples ...
1524:
If a "first review" means "is it ready for you to read?", the answer is yes.
768:
748:
692:
668:
593:
549:
511:
491:
57:
22:
1895:
1833:
Hello, Rhmccullough. It has been over six months since you last edited the
1804:
1773:
1717:
1693:
1678:
1647:
1596:
1554:
1533:
1515:
1474:
1434:
1418:
1400:
1384:
1360:
1344:
1293:
1272:
1252:
1216:
1194:
1179:
1137:
1109:
1052:
992:
961:
946:
924:
899:
877:
862:
840:
788:
774:
754:
732:
717:
698:
674:
658:
642:
614:
599:
583:
569:
555:
531:
517:
497:
479:
445:
412:
391:
355:
313:
252:
219:
186:
159:
145:
130:
78:
63:
43:
28:
708:
Hello again. I was on your talk page, and there's an edit conflict there.
1507:
1466:
1376:
1227:
1125:
891:
70:
94:
506:
You're welcome to add it again if you can back it up with sources. See
975:
932:
114:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -
1886:
Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing.
935:- it'd be a shame to not have this information be freely available
541:
1633:
then if $ child has gender = Male; then $ p rel Son = $ child; fi;
1231:
1159:
1452:
survive another AfD, but let's see if we can do better than that.
150:
Can we talk about where we are in the "underconstruction" phase?
1662:(#1 hasChild #2) and (#2 hasGender Male) implies (#1 hasSon #2)
1349:
There's probably little need for that. I moved this stuff to
1324:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
952:
Thank you. And thanks for this Wiki info. I will pursue it.
177:
3. There are a couple of glaring errors in the edits you made.
1853:
1825:
804:
106:
and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on
1457:
Philosophically, though, I predict that if Knowledge (XXG)
243:
There are no examples at all because you deleted them all.
767:
No problem, Dr.McCullough. Good luck with the article. -
510:
for more information of citing these sort of sources. -
1854:
426:
1630:
every p isu person; { if child := ? rel Mother = $ p;
1282:
1152:
upset over all their ambiguities and contradictions.
1074:
is an article which would justify the article on the
887:
972:
Wikibooks:Wikibooks:Programming languages bookshelf
679:On another note, you should take some time off the
522:Thanks for the info. For now, I'll just delete it.
1230:earlier, do you want to stick up some file like
1024:Before about, say 1999, my action syntax had not
1312:, a page you created, has been nominated for
8:
1489:has said about the history and the program.
801:AfD nomination of MKR (programming language)
403:phone: 530-541-6220 x5205 (this week only)
548:. Statements like these do need sources. -
544:where there is a citation on the statement
1658:(#1 hasMother #2) implies (#2 hasChild #1)
1203:of the list of propositions, or v is the
1570:on the full set (for instance, if I say
1407:topic on Wikiversity- the standards are
427:your edits to mKR (programming language)
1326:Talk:MKR (programming language)/Sources
1310:Talk:MKR (programming language)/Sources
1304:Talk:MKR (programming language)/Sources
868:domain wikinfo.com is now up for sale.
970:You might also want to look at these:
466:) 13:53, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Compare to
7:
1483:User:Abd/MKR (programming language)
685:articles in your area of expertise
34:Thank you!!! I did not know that.
14:
1615:meaning = { $ 1 rel Mother = $ 2;
1461:change its sourcing standards --
1821:Draft:MKR (programming language)
1463:without abandoning verifiability
93:
1746:is added. And when I then add
1232:http://mkrmke.org/wikipedia.txt
1160:http://mKRmKE.org/knowledge/rhm
1093:notability has explanation = ?;
1351:User_talk:Rhmccullough/Sources
816:, an article you created, for
1:
1896:04:29, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
683:article, and edit some other
1750:, the system checks for any
1353:in case it's useful to you.
1226:Oh, further to a comment by
693:
1609:rel_Mother is relation with
1281:wikipedia.txt installed in
1078:programming language. The
1911:
814:MKR (programming language)
691:article in the long run -
420:mKR (programming language)
108:MKR (programming language)
1805:22:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
1774:09:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
1718:17:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
1694:16:54, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
1679:16:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
1648:16:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
1618:if $ 1 has gender = Male;
1597:11:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
1578:, and I issue a query of
1555:03:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
1534:01:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
1516:16:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
1475:23:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
1435:23:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
1419:23:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
1401:23:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
1385:21:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
1361:21:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
1345:21:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
1294:17:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
1273:13:52, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
1253:13:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
1217:14:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1195:14:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1180:14:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1138:04:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1110:15:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1053:13:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
993:13:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
976:esoteric programming wiki
962:04:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
947:04:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
925:03:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
900:01:32, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
878:09:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
863:21:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
841:11:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
830:of receiving this notice?
789:07:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
775:07:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
755:07:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
733:07:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
718:07:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
699:07:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
675:07:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
659:07:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
643:07:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
615:06:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
600:06:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
584:06:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
570:06:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
556:06:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
532:06:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
518:06:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
498:05:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
480:13:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
446:13:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
413:05:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
392:13:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
375:I have replied below. -
356:09:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
314:08:25, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
253:01:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
220:21:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
187:19:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
160:18:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
146:18:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
131:18:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
79:01:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
64:10:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
44:17:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
29:16:57, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
1800:
1713:
1689:
1643:
1550:
1529:
1430:
1396:
1289:
1212:
1190:
1175:
1133:
1048:
957:
873:
784:
728:
713:
654:
638:
610:
579:
565:
527:
508:C (programming language)
475:
463:
455:
408:
351:
309:
248:
182:
155:
141:
39:
17:Re: mKR & mKE status
1621:then $ 2 rel Son = $ 1;
1830:
1320:and please be sure to
1207:of the ECP hierarchy.
1080:Icon newsletter notice
809:
743:For your information,
1835:Articles for Creation
1829:
1740:(Bob hasMother Alice)
1572:(Bob hasMother Alice)
808:
1819:Your draft article,
1748:(Bob hasGender Male)
1744:(Alice hasChild Bob)
1576:(Bob hasGender Male)
590:Conflict of interest
540:pretty low end. See
1855:edit the submission
1841:page you started, "
104:do not own articles
56:users talk page. -
1831:
1322:sign your comments
1302:MfD nomination of
1283:http://mKRmKE.org/
810:
1752:(#1 hasChild Bob)
1343:
831:
812:I have nominated
488:original research
444:
390:
218:
129:
1902:
1875:
1874:
1869:
1868:
1863:
1862:
1857:
1828:
1772:
1767:
1757:
1754:and establishes
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1677:
1672:
1663:
1659:
1595:
1590:
1581:
1580:(Alice hasSon ?)
1577:
1573:
1339:
1337:
1270:
1265:
1250:
1245:
1237:
1107:
1102:
990:
985:
825:
771:
751:
695:
671:
596:
552:
514:
494:
440:
438:
386:
384:
214:
212:
125:
123:
97:
60:
25:
1910:
1909:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1872:
1871:
1866:
1865:
1860:
1859:
1858:and remove the
1826:
1824:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:(#1 hasSon Bob)
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1563:
1486:
1372:Deletion review
1333:
1307:
1268:
1263:
1260:
1248:
1243:
1240:
1235:
1224:
1222:ID verification
1182:
1145:
1105:
1100:
1097:
988:
983:
980:
848:
826:Do you want to
803:
769:
749:
669:
594:
550:
512:
492:
470:, for example.
434:
423:
415:
380:
208:
119:
100:Knowledge (XXG)
91:
58:
23:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1908:
1906:
1837:submission or
1823:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1762:
1742:, that's when
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1667:
1637:
1634:
1631:
1628:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1616:
1613:
1610:
1607:
1604:
1585:
1562:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1544:
1541:
1537:
1536:
1522:
1485:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1438:
1437:
1404:
1403:
1306:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1276:
1275:
1261:
1241:
1223:
1220:
1170:
1144:
1141:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1098:
1094:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1008:
1001:
998:
981:
965:
964:
929:
905:
904:
903:
902:
881:
880:
847:
844:
802:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
760:
759:
758:
757:
741:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
662:
661:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
572:
501:
500:
422:
418:Your edits to
416:
398:
396:
395:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
292:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
229:
228:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
175:
172:
163:
162:
148:
90:
87:
86:
85:
84:
83:
82:
81:
47:
46:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1907:
1898:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1884:
1882:
1877:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1822:
1818:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1775:
1771:
1766:
1737:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1676:
1671:
1655:
1654:automatically
1651:
1650:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1638:
1635:
1632:
1629:
1626:
1623:
1620:
1617:
1614:
1611:
1608:
1605:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1594:
1589:
1569:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1545:
1542:
1539:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1493:
1490:
1484:
1481:Your work on
1480:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1451:
1447:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1417:
1414:
1410:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1373:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1359:
1356:
1352:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1341:(and friends)
1338:
1336:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1305:
1301:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1284:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1274:
1271:
1266:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1251:
1246:
1233:
1229:
1221:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1167:
1163:
1161:
1156:
1153:
1149:
1142:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1111:
1108:
1103:
1092:
1090:
1086:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1034:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1012:
1009:
1006:
1002:
999:
996:
995:
994:
991:
986:
977:
973:
969:
968:
967:
966:
963:
959:
955:
951:
950:
949:
948:
945:
942:
938:
934:
927:
926:
923:
920:
915:
911:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
884:
883:
882:
879:
875:
871:
867:
866:
865:
864:
861:
858:
854:
845:
843:
842:
838:
834:
833:Killerofcruft
829:
823:
819:
815:
807:
800:
790:
786:
782:
778:
777:
776:
772:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
756:
752:
746:
742:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
730:
726:
720:
719:
715:
711:
700:
696:
690:
686:
682:
678:
677:
676:
672:
666:
665:
664:
663:
660:
656:
652:
647:
646:
645:
644:
640:
636:
616:
612:
608:
603:
602:
601:
597:
591:
587:
586:
585:
581:
577:
573:
571:
567:
563:
559:
558:
557:
553:
547:
543:
539:
535:
534:
533:
529:
525:
521:
520:
519:
515:
509:
505:
504:
503:
502:
499:
495:
489:
484:
483:
482:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
448:
447:
443:
442:(and friends)
439:
437:
432:
428:
421:
417:
414:
410:
406:
402:
394:
393:
389:
388:(and friends)
385:
383:
378:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
315:
311:
307:
293:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
254:
250:
246:
242:
241:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
221:
217:
216:(and friends)
213:
211:
206:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
195:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
169:
167:
166:
165:
164:
161:
157:
153:
149:
147:
143:
139:
135:
134:
133:
132:
128:
127:(and friends)
124:
122:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
88:
80:
76:
72:
67:
66:
65:
61:
55:
51:
50:
49:
48:
45:
41:
37:
33:
32:
31:
30:
26:
16:
1885:
1878:
1867:{{db-draft}}
1847:
1832:
1797:Rhmccullough
1763:tiny plastic
1735:
1710:Rhmccullough
1686:Rhmccullough
1668:tiny plastic
1653:
1640:Rhmccullough
1586:tiny plastic
1567:
1564:
1547:Rhmccullough
1526:Rhmccullough
1505:
1501:
1497:
1494:
1491:
1487:
1462:
1458:
1449:
1445:
1427:Rhmccullough
1408:
1405:
1393:Rhmccullough
1368:
1364:
1348:
1334:
1308:
1286:Rhmccullough
1262:tiny plastic
1242:tiny plastic
1225:
1209:Rhmccullough
1204:
1200:
1198:
1187:Rhmccullough
1183:
1172:Rhmccullough
1164:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1130:Rhmccullough
1124:
1120:
1099:tiny plastic
1084:
1045:Rhmccullough
1031:
982:tiny plastic
954:Rhmccullough
936:
928:
913:
909:
906:
890:not .com. --
870:Rhmccullough
852:
849:
811:
781:Rhmccullough
744:
725:Rhmccullough
721:
710:Rhmccullough
707:
651:Rhmccullough
635:Rhmccullough
631:
607:Rhmccullough
576:Rhmccullough
562:Rhmccullough
545:
537:
524:Rhmccullough
472:Rhmccullough
467:
460:Rhmccullough
452:Rhmccullough
449:
435:
424:
405:Rhmccullough
381:
374:
348:Rhmccullough
306:Rhmccullough
245:Rhmccullough
209:
179:Rhmccullough
152:Rhmccullough
138:Rhmccullough
120:
112:welcome page
92:
53:
36:Rhmccullough
20:
1765:Grey Knight
1670:Grey Knight
1588:Grey Knight
1264:Grey Knight
1244:Grey Knight
1101:Grey Knight
1085:took notice
984:Grey Knight
933:Wikiversity
888:wikinfo.org
846:Other wikis
98:Welcome to
1873:{{db-g13}}
1861:{{db-afc}}
1612:format = ,
1561:entailment
974:, and the
425:Regarding
1888:Legacypac
1881:this link
1850:mainspace
1660:and that
1143:Languages
937:somewhere
886:that was
89:June 2008
1330:Diligent
1314:deletion
1228:User:Abd
1126:User:Abd
1089:this one
853:welcomes
818:deletion
431:Diligent
377:Diligent
205:Diligent
116:Diligent
1876:code.
1459:doesn't
1335:Terrier
1017:moment.
828:opt out
436:Terrier
382:Terrier
210:Terrier
121:Terrier
1738:I add
1416:(talk)
1413:Friday
1358:(talk)
1355:Friday
944:(talk)
941:Friday
922:(talk)
919:Friday
860:(talk)
857:Friday
1870:, or
1839:Draft
1636:fi;};
1624:fi;};
1568:query
1450:might
1446:ever.
1095:) --
303:: -->
302:: -->
301:: -->
300:: -->
299:: -->
298:: -->
297:: -->
296:: -->
295:: -->
294:: -->
290:: -->
289:: -->
288:: -->
287:: -->
286:: -->
285:: -->
284:: -->
283:: -->
282:: -->
281:: -->
54:other
1892:talk
1845:".
1801:talk
1736:when
1714:talk
1690:talk
1644:talk
1603:= ?;
1574:and
1551:talk
1530:talk
1512:talk
1471:talk
1431:talk
1397:talk
1381:talk
1290:talk
1213:talk
1205:name
1201:name
1191:talk
1176:talk
1134:talk
1076:Ruby
1072:here
1049:talk
958:talk
910:also
896:talk
874:talk
837:talk
785:talk
770:Amog
750:Amog
729:talk
714:talk
694:Amog
670:Amog
655:talk
639:talk
611:talk
595:Amog
580:talk
566:talk
551:Amog
528:talk
513:Amog
493:Amog
476:talk
464:talk
456:talk
409:talk
352:talk
310:talk
249:talk
183:talk
156:talk
142:talk
75:talk
59:Amog
40:talk
24:Amog
1843:MKR
1508:Abd
1467:Abd
1409:way
1377:Abd
1236::-)
939:.
914:are
892:Abd
773:|
753:|
697:|
689:mKR
681:mKR
673:|
598:|
554:|
542:C++
516:|
496:|
468:XML
71:Abd
62:|
27:|
1894:)
1864:,
1803:)
1716:)
1692:)
1646:)
1553:)
1532:)
1514:)
1473:)
1433:)
1399:)
1383:)
1375:--
1292:)
1215:)
1193:)
1178:)
1168:.
1136:)
1051:)
960:)
898:)
876:)
839:)
787:)
747:-
731:)
716:)
657:)
641:)
613:)
582:)
568:)
538:is
530:)
490:-
478:)
411:)
354:)
312:)
251:)
185:)
158:)
144:)
77:)
42:)
1890:(
1799:(
1770:⊖
1712:(
1688:(
1675:⊖
1642:(
1593:⊖
1549:(
1528:(
1510:(
1469:(
1429:(
1395:(
1379:(
1288:(
1269:⊖
1249:⊖
1211:(
1189:(
1174:(
1132:(
1106:⊖
1047:(
1007:.
989:⊖
956:(
894:(
872:(
835:(
783:(
727:(
712:(
653:(
637:(
609:(
578:(
564:(
526:(
474:(
462:(
454:(
407:(
350:(
308:(
247:(
181:(
154:(
140:(
73:(
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
