User talk:RichMac - Knowledge

1455:. Basically, some archives try to give the impression that public domain images in their collection require fees, and aren't upfront about public domain images that anyone can use. If you get a photo from VPL, it comes with conditions and possibly a fee (depending on usage). That's not copyright law, though, it's contract. They own the actual physical photograph or negative that's being reproduced, but the image itself is public domain (if older than 1949). So if you get it from their database, they don't have the right to try and restrict usage. BC Archives is the worst for being misleading on this. The National Archives clearly marks which ones are copyright-expired, while VPL is somewhere in between. My favourite is the City of Vancouver Archives, which has actually contributed to Knowledge and donated images that aren't yet public domain ( 753:), the most supreme interpreter is Pastora Pavón", about tientos (another flamenco style): "From Manuel Torre, tientos passed to Pastora Pavón, whose eminently dynamic genius multiplied them and had the best out of them with spontaneous and infallible art"... etc, etc. etc. As I've said, I'll be adding more comments and sources. If I find any negative comment, OK, I'll add it... but it will be difficult to find one. I don't think that stating the (generally accepted) artistic value of a singer is lack of objectivity. As I say, nobody would discuss Shakespeare's importance to English literature. But I understand that English Knowledge readers may need more confirmation, if flamenco is not part of their culture.... Now it's 3:47 a.m. here, and I need a sleep, so good night. (By the way, 2675: 653:"Many people love and use open source software. Open source has made an impact in just about every place imaginable; education, hardware, coke, beer, cell phones, pharmaceuticals, search engines and encyclopedias. However, OpenHuman takes it one step further and invites you to open source yourself to experiment with the open human idea. This may sound crazy and rife with privacy concerns but as the author asks, do you still believe in Internet privacy in the age of blogs, MySpace, LinkedIn, Meetup, and Flickr?" 649:, so I figured that it could be notable enough for Knowledge. It's not that OpenHuman itself is any more notable than it really is, but that it is strongly related to the open-source movement in a way that few other sites are. Slashdot's actual post regarding OpenHuman accurately sums the significance that OpenHuman has to the open-source and social website movement, and how those two ideas, when combined, create privacy concerns: 2517: 2415: 2191: 2470: 1975: 2261: 2780: 2345: 2536:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2434:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2130: 732:, but doubting the importance of this singer is like doubting the importance of Shakespeare for English literature. If you have any concrete claims on any particular sentence, please specify, adding your sources, as I've done. In the meantime, I'll be adding more sources and information (the article is a start, so give me break). 322:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

2366:

is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us

828:

I'm not sure why RichMac feels that this article "does not assert the importance or significance of the subject." This is the officer that repeatedly tasered Mostafa Tabatabainejad at the UCLA library and has been in the news. There is also plenty of public information about his past investigations,

2277:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if

1357:

where the official coordinates are given and then explain in the body of the article where the aircraft dock, about 49 17 26N 123 07 09W. It is viewable in Google maps as well, both images show 6 planes docked. The Flight Supplement map shows the dock area as a "restricted area" and then says that

1327:

Sorry to take so long in answering, I was trying to find things based on the Google Earth and the rotten black and white maps in the Flight Supplements. This is easier to follow if you have Google Earth but is still be viewable with the Google maps, (satellite images). The 49" 16' 26.44 N 123" 07'

780:

Well, I think that now the claim of "most important blah, blah" is sufficiently substantiated in the article, especially in the section on "views" and by the sources. It would be cumbersome to give all these quotations in the introduction. I searched all my books on flamenco and several web pages,

824:

which has been making the news recently. This issue vitally important to police-community relations! I don't understand why you have me 30 seconds to defend the article before you deleted it! I hadn't even finished putting up information about it! This is what I originally wanted to write for a

2643:

experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a

1100:

Sorry, the writing you refer to wasn't me. There is a user called Jayden-something... It might have been his/hers. Either that, or someone is using my account without my knowledge. Unlikely, though, it was probably just a similarly named person. If you could direct me to the discussion in

950:

Why do you delete everything I write? I am still working with the changes you wanted me to make, but the text disappears all the time, and it stresses me. Why is the artist also deleted? She is a famous wellrenowned Swedish artist, WHY?? If you delete her I want you to delete: me as a member

1439:. That way, they can be used on other language projects (German Knowledge in particular has been adding Vancouver material). The other thing is just to mention the archival source (City of Vancouver Archives, BC Archives, etc) if it's from an online database/website. Cheers, 890:

hello! is it possible to take away the warnings now since the next is neutralized and just informative - we don't sell anything (not even on the art museum's or studio's home page. the text is completely informative from a cultural perspective.. Please let me know! Nike

886:

381:

You're right, a {{test}} is more appripriate, I thought your warning was old. Thanks for the heads up, I'll be removing the warning. Happy patrolling. Oh and by the way; use the substitution template for delivering warnings to vandals (for example: {{subst:test}}) --–

2716: 861:

The STUDIO L2 page has been CHANGED!! - I was actually working with and the changes was been performed at the same time as the warnings came up. Now it does not sound as an advert (it did first, since the next was copy pasted, then I CHANGED it)... OK? Nike

829:

as well as lots of information that NEEDS to be documented as the investigation of the incident continues. I will be adding more information on him, and I hope that others will also contribute. This is not a small matter as it has made national news.

657:

Therefore, I think it's important to have an OpenHuman article because it reveals how far we are willing to go with this open-source/social stuff, to the point where the creator of the site even suggests that users upload "naked pictures" :/

2706: 642:

already deleted it. I created the article because the site looked interesting and I was immensely bored. But now that I must defend myself, here's the best (subjective) defense of the article: "OpenHuman" was notable enough to be

2726: 1352:

and in Google Earth with the Panoramio setting on you can see where the float planes are and from there a little bit more west and you can see planes tied up. I think that it might be an idea to do something similar to

2721: 458:

indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

2586:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 920:

Hello even less text now....take away as much as you like. We just want to inform about the Studio L2, which is more like an institution than a commercial gallery. Please erase as much as u like! Thanks! Nike

792:

No need to apologize. I understand that for people who are not into traditional flamenco, any statement about the importance of a flamenco artist should be verifiable. Thanks for making me more aware of it.

450:. Knowledge gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an 566:, which you tagged for speedy deletion with the reason "it is patent nonsense", I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This article does not qualify for speedy deletion because 1408:

Just so you know, that was an actual screencap from the show. Not going to revert it, because it is a bad representation of Max and doesn't add anything to the article, but don't be so quick to judge.

2711: 2090:

Hi about this Image File:American Sholin DVD Cover.jpg I see that its pixalated and i was wondering if you could upload a image of more suitable quality image It might be three years late but any way

745:

She is called "Most important woman flamenco singer" by Álvarez Caballero in both his books in the sources list. "the most important singer of her time" by Ríos Ruiz (2002), Some quotations from

1885: