107:
68:
129:
content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about
111:
26:
40:, a forum on Knowledge for new editors to ask questions about editing Knowledge, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
76:
179:
155:
126:
119:
84:
151:
144:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
194:
115:
131:
80:
187:
183:
178:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
52:
114:
your contributions to
Knowledge, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
193:
For information on how to contribute to
Knowledge when you have a conflict of interest, please see
37:
130:
that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by
212:
Of concern is a history of unsourced contributions, and the likelihood of self-citing. Thanks,
48:
137:
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
47:
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have!
165:
217:
202:
96:
88:
25:
83:
and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
164:
to the
Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
75:. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a
87:
tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
213:
198:
92:
72:
106:
67:
158:, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
174:
so that you do not accidentally breach
Knowledge's content policies.
221:
206:
100:
56:
142:
Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating
125:
All editors are required to comply with
Knowledge's
150:. Everyone is welcome to provide information about
79:. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
195:our frequently asked questions for organizations
134:and writing with as little bias as possible.
17:Welcome to Knowledge: check out the Teahouse!
8:
148:Be cautious about deletion discussions
7:
122:or close connection to the subject.
14:
105:
66:
24:
1:
118:on Knowledge, you may have a
222:15:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
207:15:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
184:verifiability of information
101:15:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
238:
85:referencing for beginners
57:17:40, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
36:, you are invited to the
172:Exercise great caution
116:you have written about
180:neutral point of view
127:neutral point of view
156:deletion discussions
120:conflict of interest
152:independent sources
81:include a citation
110:Hello, Rjw99. We
45:
44:
229:
132:reliable sources
109:
70:
28:
21:
20:
237:
236:
232:
231:
230:
228:
227:
226:
188:autobiographies
77:reliable source
64:
59:
41:
19:
12:
11:
5:
235:
233:
225:
224:
176:
175:
169:
166:Knowledge:Spam
159:
145:
91:. Thank you.
63:
60:
46:
43:
42:
31:
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
234:
223:
219:
215:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
197:. Thank you.
196:
191:
189:
185:
181:
173:
170:
167:
163:
162:Avoid linking
160:
157:
153:
149:
146:
143:
140:
139:
138:
135:
133:
128:
123:
121:
117:
113:
108:
103:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
69:
62:February 2014
61:
58:
54:
50:
39:
35:
30:
27:
23:
22:
16:
192:
177:
171:
161:
147:
141:
136:
124:
104:
89:my talk page
65:
33:
71:Hello, I'm
38:Teahouse
112:welcome
32:Hello!
186:, and
49:Sarah
34:Rjw99
218:talk
203:talk
97:talk
53:talk
214:JNW
199:JNW
154:in
93:JNW
73:JNW
220:)
205:)
190:.
182:,
168:).
99:)
55:)
216:(
201:(
95:(
51:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
