468:
for example, but not quite what was in the article. But instead, there is nothing that links
Armenians with either belief; one is linked to another ethnic group, and one is not mentioned. (Having read the source, I wouldn't be too terribly surprised if it turned out one or both were true about old Armenian beliefs too, but they are not in the source provided.) If this was a one-off, I could easily chalk it up to misreading the source, but coming as it does in the middle of cries of "I win", and general problematic behavior across multiple articles, I am going to re-block RonaldMerchant indef for intentionally misrepresenting sources in an article to win an argument with a perceived enemy.
349:
274:
426:
406:
to your motives but I undid all of your deletions myself because I do not believe you have researched anything. It looks to me like you are using your own best judgement and unfortunately I strongly disagree with that. So unless you can provide some sort of rationale, kindly leave the information in place or gain a consensus for removal since your edits have now been challenged twice. Regards -
379:
501:, both references to Stein's paper misrepresent the source, the view attributed (without page number) to Jeffries is the opposite of his view, the quotation of Congreve is stolen together with its citation from a book of Norman Rose and maliciously truncated, and the reference to Wilson is entirely invented.
467:
is the claim. I have read the referenced source, and Sarek is correct that there is nothing in there about
Armenians or Armenian Americans believing either of those two things. I think I misunderstood Sarek above, I was worried that there might be something in there about Armenians and broken charms,
405:
I reverted your edits for a couple of reasons. As a proud southerner from
Memphis, TN as well as being Scotch Irish myself I happen to know for a fact that Elvis Presley was indeed at least part Scotch-Irish. Then I looked to the Elvis article and this fact is mentioned. I do not wish to suggest as
509:, who was blocked for socking a few days before this username was created. That user also lied about sources, including the same ones, and had remarkably similar characteristics. Given this history, I expect this user to resurface under another name and resume dishonest editing.
474:
Since this is a significant change from a 60 hour block, I have reinstated your ability to edit your talk page, in case you want to make an honest, well-reasoned, drama-free unblock request. But at the first whiff of trolling or flaming, it will get
242:
174:
Users are allowed to remove items from their talk page, and by removing it they acknowledge that they read the item, so please stop undoing his edit.
368:. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked due to misuse while blocked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the
369:
314:
252:
Look, if he doesn't want conflict, why does he keep prolonging it? And bringing everything to admin? Leave me alone, and I'll leave him alone
31:
131:
Hi, regardless of the merit of your edit which I disagreed with and undid, you should definitely not mark such edits as minor. Cheers, --
320:
209:
Reviewing your recent contributions, while I don't necessarily disagree with the material being added, I think you should review
112:
56:
328:
61:
497:
some admin is tempted to moderate this block, I'll note here that this user repeatedly lied about sources. For example, in
298:
213:. Typically, when you insert material and another user reverts that addition, you discuss it on the relevant talk page.
356:
332:
281:
146:
I see you have removed this a third time. At least you didn't flag it as minor this time, thanks for that. Rather than
71:
65:
365:
294:
290:
42:
27:
78:
336:
82:
324:
94:
485:
86:
47:
411:
179:
117:
98:
505:
is also fake. This block has saved me the trouble of filing an SPI to ask for a comparison against
253:
228:
190:
425:
441:
433:
391:
38:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
93:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
506:
481:
304:
246:
456:
210:
183:
407:
215:
175:
107:
147:
159:
136:
510:
437:
387:
52:
151:
513:
489:
445:
415:
395:
341:
261:
236:
221:
198:
163:
140:
121:
155:
132:
364:
for gross incivility. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
35:
90:
245:
was a mandatory note, not harassment. Tune it down a little.
424:
347:
272:
327:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
502:
498:
464:
331:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
101:, or ask your question on this page and then place
293:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
297:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
8:
372:, then contact the unblock mailing list at
154:and see if you can justify this removal? --
319:During a dispute, you should first try to
77:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
105:before the question. Again, welcome!
432:Thanks for your support at the Afd on
170:Re-adding stuff to people's talk pages
7:
43:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
30:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
150:, why not join the discussion at
127:London and use of minor edit flag
377:
62:How to create your first article
34:, especially what you did for
1:
503:The source given in this edit
321:discuss controversial changes
285:from editing for a period of
455:Quoting what I just said at
421:A Palestinian rabbi for you!
514:08:10, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
490:20:18, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
446:14:25, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
416:04:14, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
396:03:13, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
342:03:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
262:02:34, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
237:02:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
222:02:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
199:01:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
184:01:21, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
164:07:25, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
141:07:11, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
26:Hello, RonaldMerchant, and
529:
313:, but you should read the
169:
122:16:18, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
378:
370:guide to appealing blocks
366:make useful contributions
315:guide to appealing blocks
295:make useful contributions
95:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
257:
247:Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556
232:
194:
57:How to develop articles
429:
354:I have increased your
352:
277:
428:
401:Scotch-Irish American
351:
309:Your reason here ~~~~
276:
338:SarekOfVulcan (talk)
383:lists.wikimedia.org
301:by adding the text
434:Palestinian rabbis
430:
353:
329:dispute resolution
278:
53:How to edit a page
32:your contributions
507:User:JerryDavid89
479:
299:appeal this block
85:your messages on
520:
477:
384:
382:
381:
380:
350:
339:
312:
275:
218:
115:
110:
104:
87:discussion pages
528:
527:
523:
522:
521:
519:
518:
517:
453:
423:
403:
398:
376:
374:
348:
345:
337:
333:page protection
302:
273:
270:
216:
207:
172:
129:
113:
108:
102:
72:Manual of Style
19:
12:
11:
5:
526:
524:
471:
470:
452:
449:
422:
419:
402:
399:
346:
279:You have been
271:
269:
266:
265:
264:
254:RonaldMerchant
240:
239:
229:RonaldMerchant
206:
203:
202:
201:
191:RonaldMerchant
171:
168:
167:
166:
128:
125:
75:
74:
69:
66:Article Wizard
59:
50:
45:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
525:
516:
515:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:
487:
483:
476:
475:re-protected.
469:
466:
462:
461:
460:
458:
450:
448:
447:
443:
439:
435:
427:
420:
418:
417:
413:
409:
400:
397:
393:
389:
385:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
344:
343:
340:
334:
330:
326:
322:
316:
310:
306:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
238:
234:
230:
226:
225:
224:
223:
220:
219:
212:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
187:
186:
185:
181:
177:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
144:
143:
142:
138:
134:
126:
124:
123:
120:
119:
116:
111:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
73:
70:
67:
63:
60:
58:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
39:
37:
33:
29:
24:
23:
16:
495:Just in case
494:
493:
473:
472:
463:
454:
431:
404:
375:unblock-en-l
373:
361:
355:
318:
308:
291:edit warring
286:
280:
241:
214:
208:
205:Edit warring
173:
148:edit-warring
130:
118:(yada, yada)
106:
99:my talk page
97:, ask me on
76:
68:if you wish)
25:
21:
20:
482:Floquenbeam
478:(Nevermind)
451:Indef block
268:August 2011
152:Talk:London
103:{{help me}}
89:using four
64:(using the
408:4twenty42o
217:Falcon8765
176:ZamorakO o
79:Wikipedian
499:this edit
325:consensus
323:and seek
81:! Please
438:Chesdovi
388:Qwyrxian
362:60 hours
307:|reason=
287:31 hours
48:Tutorial
22:Welcome!
305:unblock
282:blocked
28:welcome
17:Welcome
457:WP:ANI
317:first.
211:WP:BRD
114:crewer
91:tildes
36:Hebron
357:block
511:Zero
486:talk
465:Here
442:talk
412:talk
392:talk
289:for
258:talk
243:This
233:talk
227:Ok.
195:talk
189:Ok.
180:talk
160:talk
156:John
137:talk
133:John
109:brew
83:sign
55:and
360:to
488:)
480:--
459::
444:)
436:.
414:)
394:)
386:.
335:.
311:}}
303:{{
260:)
235:)
197:)
182:)
162:)
139:)
484:(
440:(
410:(
390:(
256:(
231:(
193:(
178:(
158:(
135:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.