425:
should leave a note explaining why this was done… If the material must be addressed urgently (for example, unambiguous copyright, attack, defamation, or BLP reasons, etc.), the user appears inactive, the edit appears unlikely to cause problems, and you are quite sure the material is inappropriate, then remove or fix the problem material minimally and leave a note explaining what you have done, why you have done so, and inviting the user to discuss if needed.
195:
620:
545:
472:
250:
111:
extremely seriously. As such, your depiction of
Sannacott's edits are conspicuous and will be included in any vandalism alert if I make one. That said, Sannacott has since made a compromise edit more in keeping with Knowledge (XXG)'s ethos of collegiality, so we have stepped back from the brink for the time being. -
129:
true spirit of
Knowledge (XXG). The ownership bit I am sure could be verified but appears rather unbalanced in the opening paragraph. Bringing it "up to date" is a reference to Sannacott's changes of year/event which had been removed in the reversions. Hopefully everyone is happy with what appears now.
228:
Having looked at your contributions over several years, it does seem that you would benefit from having a try at editing other articles. You'd gain a broader range of experience of writing about talking about issues. Also, I recommend, where possible, making your points more concise. Busier editors
128:
Hi again. You have still lost me. Is it the bit about ownership of
Waterperry or the bit about volunteers and charging entrance? These are the only bits I can see that you could be objecting to. As I see it, the charging bit placed where it was looked like opinion/inuendo rather than facts in the
424:
The best option if there is a concern with a user's page is to draw their attention to the matter via their talk page and let them edit it themselves, if they are agreeable. In some cases a more experienced editor may make non-trivial edits to another user's user space, in which case that editor
370:, editors are not allowed to edit others' messages to e.g. correct spelling mistakes or change the meaning of the messages, without the user's permission. However, they, and other edits, are allowed to remove part of a message if it that particular part constitutes a clear personal attack or
110:
You know perfectly well that the paragraph in question, and its verifiable reference, was unilaterally ripped out by
Sannacott more than once without discussion. That does not characterise bringing something "up to date" as you describe it. That characterizes vandalism, which Wikiepdia takes
557:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
427:
The message
Travelmite left you seemed problematic, as it appeared that since you have collaborated in the past s/he left it out of bias in hopes you would take his/her side. I removed it in good faith, but neglected to explain why to you. Sorry about that.
484:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
92:
Hi
Roberthall7 I have seen your reversions of Sannacott's edits and your note to him. Please justify this and explain what in particular you are objecting to. As far as I can see, Sannacott was bringing this page up to date.
365:
regarding active blocks, editors may remove messages (in whole) from their own talk pages. This is usually an indication the message has been read, and the removed message will still remain in the talk page's history. Per
663:
585:
512:
382:}}. Examples of messages that can be removed in whole by uninvolved editors, as a courtesy, include clear vandalism, trolling and personal attacks. If said messages have already been replied to, they can be e.g.
150:
Hi
Roberthall7, I've made a comment on the talk page. Skyring/Pete should not be deleting sourced content. Feel free to ping me on my talk page and remind me to join the discussion if I forget. Thanks,
647:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
569:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
496:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
633:
174:
Hi
Roberthall7, thanks for your feedback on my edits. Could you message me with your with any objections before reverting anything. I'm more than happy to address any objections. Thanks.
409:
343:
199:
342:
Greetings, Roberthall7. Apologies for the delay, I’ve been busy with other things recently and I’ve also not been well. In response to your message at
274:
685:
599:
526:
26:
203:
398:
only list some examples of appropriate message refactoring and inappropriate talk page behaviour respectively. They don't mention
48:
681:
595:
522:
656:
578:
505:
43:
346:, here is a general outline of Knowledge (XXG)'s talk page guidelines on removal and refactoring of user talk page messages:
53:
668:
590:
517:
88:
266:
207:
144:
419:
33:
22:
179:
644:
566:
493:
60:
408:
User Pete/Skring has come off his block & has made some ridiculous but serious accusations against me at
350:
64:
309:
76:
68:
354:
38:
328:
234:
214:
627:
553:
480:
462:
439:
and should be blocked, but looking at the situation again, it seems both parties have been uncivil.
436:
362:
358:
349:
In general, the only people who should remove user talk page messages are the person who made them (
435:
in the past, and while I fear I may have been too quick to jump in and suggest that the former was
175:
640:
562:
489:
162:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
75:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
379:
305:
254:
134:
98:
652:
574:
501:
395:
371:
675:
440:
112:
655:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
648:
577:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
570:
504:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
497:
399:
391:
367:
261:
that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
403:
324:
279:
230:
210:
415:
323:
Please note that comments on this page were recently reverted. Check your edit history!
297:
154:
432:
375:
130:
94:
619:
544:
471:
198:
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
414:, letting you know about the discussion at ANI), but canvassing is regarded as
206:
incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.. The matter concerns the
296:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
79:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
689:
603:
530:
456:
332:
313:
238:
218:
183:
169:
138:
120:
102:
659:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
581:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
508:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
637:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
431:
To answer your other question, I haven’t interacted with Travelmite or
72:
353:) and the person whose talk page the message was written on. Per
672:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
662:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
584:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
511:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
344:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Stalking
631:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
361:
is preferred, and with some exceptions such as declined
643:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
565:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
492:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
301:
289:
285:
270:
410:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
189:
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
338:Removal and refactoring of user talk page messages
412:. That's my thanks for trying to be even-handed!
402:(which is what happened in this situation, when
374:. They may replace it with a template such as {{
200:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest/Noticeboard
8:
614:
59:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
449:If you reply here, please ping me (type
423:
407:
83:before the question. Again, welcome!
7:
628:2019 Arbitration Committee elections
554:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
481:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
645:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
567:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
494:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
34:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
611:ArbCom 2019 election voter message
551:Hello, Roberthall7. Voting in the
538:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
478:Hello, Roberthall7. Voting in the
25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
618:
543:
470:
248:
193:
666:and submit your choices on the
588:and submit your choices on the
1:
690:00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
531:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
170:16:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
604:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
372:clearly unacceptable conduct
184:10:20, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
49:How to write a great article
515:and submit your choices on
457:12:43, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
333:06:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
244:Reference errors on 28 July
229:will skip over long texts.
709:
682:MediaWiki message delivery
596:MediaWiki message delivery
523:MediaWiki message delivery
513:the candidates' statements
267:School of Economic Science
208:School of Economic Science
145:School of Economic Science
314:00:19, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
239:15:53, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
219:19:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
139:13:09, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
121:11:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
103:13:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
77:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
680:to your user talk page.
302:report it to my operator
116:
21:Hello, Roberthall7, and
275:unnamed parameter error
406:left you the message,
259:automatically detected
641:Arbitration Committee
625:Hello! Voting in the
563:Arbitration Committee
490:Arbitration Committee
463:ArbCom Elections 2016
453:before your message).
202:regarding a possible
451:{{ping|Linguist111}}
319:Reverts on this page
204:conflict of interest
386:(syntax: <s: -->
224:Two recommendations
657:arbitration policy
579:arbitration policy
506:arbitration policy
465:: Voting now open!
44:How to edit a page
27:your contributions
696:
695:
454:
283:
67:your messages on
700:
679:
622:
615:
547:
474:
455:
448:
445:
363:unblock requests
277:
252:
251:
197:
196:
168:
165:
82:
69:discussion pages
708:
707:
703:
702:
701:
699:
698:
697:
673:
613:
608:
607:
548:
540:
535:
534:
518:the voting page
475:
467:
447:
441:
420:WP:USERTALKBLOG
387:text</s: -->
340:
321:
249:
246:
226:
194:
191:
163:
152:
148:
80:
54:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
706:
704:
694:
693:
664:the candidates
634:eligible users
623:
612:
609:
586:the candidates
549:
542:
541:
539:
536:
476:
469:
468:
466:
460:
351:self-reverting
339:
336:
320:
317:
298:false positive
294:
293:
245:
242:
225:
222:
190:
187:
176:Concentrado343
147:
142:
126:
125:
124:
123:
86:
57:
56:
51:
46:
41:
36:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
705:
692:
691:
687:
683:
677:
671:
670:
665:
660:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
636:
635:
630:
629:
624:
621:
617:
616:
610:
606:
605:
601:
597:
593:
592:
587:
582:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
559:
556:
555:
546:
537:
533:
532:
528:
524:
520:
519:
514:
509:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
486:
483:
482:
473:
464:
461:
459:
458:
452:
446:
444:
438:
434:
429:
426:
421:
417:
413:
411:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
364:
360:
356:
352:
347:
345:
337:
335:
334:
330:
326:
318:
316:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
291:
287:
281:
276:
272:
268:
264:
263:
262:
260:
256:
243:
241:
240:
236:
232:
223:
221:
220:
216:
212:
209:
205:
201:
188:
186:
185:
181:
177:
172:
171:
166:
160:
159:
158:
146:
143:
141:
140:
136:
132:
122:
118:
114:
109:
108:
107:
106:
105:
104:
100:
96:
91:
90:
89:Art in Action
84:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
19:
18:
667:
661:
638:
632:
626:
589:
583:
560:
552:
550:
516:
510:
487:
479:
477:
450:
443:Linguist 111
442:
430:
390:
383:
348:
341:
322:
306:ReferenceBot
295:
290:Ask for help
258:
255:ReferenceBot
247:
227:
192:
173:
156:
155:
149:
127:
87:
85:
58:
20:
16:
15:
669:voting page
591:voting page
357:, although
355:WP:BLANKING
253:Hello, I'm
113:Roberthall7
71:using four
653:topic bans
575:topic bans
502:topic bans
437:WP:NOTHERE
416:disruptive
404:Travelmite
400:canvassing
325:Travelmite
304:. Thanks,
300:, you can
273:caused an
231:Travelmite
211:Travelmite
81:{{helpme}}
61:Wikipedian
649:site bans
571:site bans
498:site bans
359:archiving
271:your edit
257:. I have
63:! Please
380:Redacted
378:}} or {{
157:Keithbob
39:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
676:NoACEMM
433:Skyring
396:WP:TPNO
265:On the
131:wikirpg
95:wikirpg
23:welcome
422:says,
392:WP:TPO
384:struck
368:WP:TPO
269:page,
73:tildes
686:talk
639:The
600:talk
561:The
527:talk
488:The
394:and
329:talk
310:talk
280:help
235:talk
215:talk
180:talk
164:Talk
135:talk
117:talk
99:talk
65:sign
388:).
376:RPA
286:Fix
284:. (
688:)
678:}}
674:{{
651:,
602:)
594:.
573:,
529:)
521:.
500:,
418:.
331:)
312:)
288:|
237:)
217:)
182:)
167:•
161:•
153:—
151:--
137:)
119:)
101:)
684:(
598:(
525:(
327:(
308:(
292:)
282:)
278:(
233:(
213:(
178:(
133:(
115:(
97:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.