Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Robin99

Source 📝

87:
is one from the BBC. There are hundreds of reputable sources for this subject which even a two minute Google search turns up. Please explain why you appear to be targeting articles on this subject for deletion. Thanks,
16:
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Knowledge (XXG) without a valid reason, which you should specify in the
37:
I have replied to your message on the talk page of this article. Please note that you haven't (as I write this) completed the AfD nomination process yet. Please read and follow
105:
article since the AfD itself remains incomplete. You can replace it if you complete the AfD process for this article, but I will ask you to first read our policy on
75:
notable. Coud you explain why are you trying to have articles related to the railway preservation movement deleted when they are obviously notable?
76: 45:
multiple ] that show its notability. I agree with you that it requires proper citation, but the way to achieve that is to put a {{
80: 41:
for listing an article at AfD if you haven't already. I'm afraid this article is clearly notable and it is easy to
102: 68: 64: 60: 26: 63:. Please do so, or I will remove the AfD notice from the article. I will point out that just like 109:. I don't see what justification there would be for proposing that article for deletion. Thanks, 106: 18: 46: 38: 84: 42: 22: 110: 89: 50: 113: 92: 53: 29:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
71:
is extremely unlikely to be deleted since the subject matter is
49:}} tag on the article, not try to have it deleted. Thanks, 101:
I have gone ahead and removed the AfD notice from the
79:is a New York Times article on a railroad museum, 107:not disrupting Knowledge (XXG) to prove a point 83:is another from the San Francisco Chronicle, 8: 59:You still haven't completed the AfD for 7: 14: 1: 114:00:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 93:23:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 54:22:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 132: 103:List of heritage railways 69:List of heritage railways 65:List of transport museums 61:List of heritage railways 33:List of heritage railways 25:. Take a look at our 21:or on the article's 123: 39:the instructions 131: 130: 126: 125: 124: 122: 121: 120: 35: 12: 11: 5: 129: 127: 119: 118: 117: 116: 96: 95: 34: 31: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 128: 115: 112: 108: 104: 100: 99: 98: 97: 94: 91: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 58: 57: 56: 55: 52: 48: 44: 40: 32: 30: 28: 24: 20: 72: 36: 27:welcome page 19:edit summary 15: 23:talk page 111:Gwernol 90:Gwernol 73:clearly 51:Gwernol 47:sources 67:, the 85:here 81:here 77:Here 43:cite

Index

edit summary
talk page
welcome page
the instructions
cite
sources
Gwernol
22:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
List of heritage railways
List of transport museums
List of heritage railways
Here
here
here
Gwernol
23:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
List of heritage railways
not disrupting Knowledge (XXG) to prove a point
Gwernol
00:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.