830:, while I was under the impression that those images were fair use instead of non-free contents. In case they were removed due to excessive use, non-free or not, I pray you rescind the removal since not a single one of them was uploaded for any purpose outside pictorially demonstrating the contents of those articles, which was not uncalled for by any means. In case it was due to being non-free, please cite what notes I should include in my fair use rationale. Please reply ASAP.
31:
288:...I'm beginning to see why Jimbo (in his statement of principles) says that meta-discussions shouldn't take place here. We're here for one purpose only. The rules, by nature and the foundations of this encyclopedia, are secondary. We really are building the bike while riding it, and the funny thing is, it's worked out quite well.
1379:
Hey there - actually I'm not really much of an image patroller, but I came across it today and noticed it was uploaded and placed there by a user who has been warned about images in the past, so I removed it. Then of course I got distracted with something else and haven't made it over to WP:PUI yet.
1104:
First off, I removed the images because they were in violation of policy. Plain and simple. Now, in terms of WP:IAR, Knowledge's policy for ignoring all rules means that you do not have to learn every minute detail of the rules before editing, not that you can do whatever you feel like doing and then
966:
Willybr; putting in URLs to images is, in my experience, unprecedented. If you want to put a ref tag on the character, and in the ref tag put a reference to an external website with detailed information on the character, perhaps including a picture, that would be fine. But, putting a link directly to
1301:
It's gained consensus due to the fact that it's been sitting up on the project page change-free for months now. You can't just go and change it without serious discussion first. I'm open to changing the wording, but a blind revert back to the old version (and yes, it's the "old version" now) is just
1137:
I really don't know if you're an admin or not, but you have no right to suddenly appear and delete every image there is. At least try to discuss the matter like I did. We can't give articles to every character because, even though they are notable enough for one, they lack proper information, except
917:
I'll do that. I'm not concerned so much with the images of characters that already have their own articles as much as I am with those that don't merit having individual articles made about them...seems to me that having a bunch of stub- or Start-class articles with one image apiece isn't any better
530:
When you say that IAR is used to justify anti-consensus and unilateral action, what you might actually mean is that IAR is used to justify being a *********. You might be disappointed to learn that people can use "consensus" to be a *********. Ever been reverted to the "consensus version"? My memory
1195:
before you act and actually discuss with the people working on the article before deleting all the images, as not all images should be deleted. It is for that that they are angry, which you and Durin have yet to realize. To further prove my point, it is through not talking things through (or rather
1550:
Template messages are used to alert a user about an issue, not to promote conversation. The purpose of an archive is to serve as a useful reference tool for previous discussions. Because template messages do not by definition facilitate discussion, there is no need to reference them in the future.
1200:
article is going to be deleted. Before you try anything anymore, at least talk things through with the editors on that page and come to a comprimise. Knowledge says that three images non-free is permitted on an article somewhere (new, don't know every policy yet), yet he deleted an image when only
635:
Hi
Rockstar. Just wanted to say that I agree with your views, and I wanted to encourage you not to be put off by one awkward editor. I'd like to get this article in good shape, and it would be helpful if you could continue to voice your thoughts and opinions on how to best do that. Cheers.
1105:
use IAR as an excuse for your actions. In short, edit warring against consensus and policy will result in a block. Oh, and I was being serious about you having a great day; it was not some semi-dickish means to annoy you. So thanks, and have a great day -- life's too short to be angry.
244:-- we don't want to have potentially libelous material on Knowledge. In any case, I can definitely help with any questions, but judging from your edit history, you're already doing an amazing job! In case you don't have my talk page watched, I'll go ahead and post this on yours. :)
580:
hey did u talk to the record producers? if u didnt tell my name is Tamie or tell em my stage name T. Valentine. i have all my songs written do u know any local recording studios i can record em at? i live in the Miami, Miramar area could look for some for me 2?..=]..thankies!!..=]
1160:
for why images like these are to be removed, but I highly suggest you familiarize yourself with the policies before reverting. And I'm not an admin, but per
Knowledge's policies, I absolutely have the right to remove anything in an article that is a flagrant violation of policy.
1287:
and I don't see where you've even commented in that section. Obviously, many people object strongly enough to the added words to be willing to revert- so I don't think it's remotely accurate to assert that this has already gained consensus.
646:
Thanks for the note -- I was just getting tired of the constant back-and-forth and belligerent attitude. Hopefully we might start seeing some positive changes now. But thanks for jumping in -- I really do appreciate it.
129:
Alright, whatever. It's not like IAR is going anywhere anyway. I'm just disappointed that I'm being accused of violating WP:POINT and trolling. AGF has gone out the window, apparently. I'm voting for Kim
Bruning, then.
1302:
as unacceptable as someone changing it back to the "nervous and depressed" version without consensus. And just because it's being discussed on the talk page doesn't mean it has community consensus to change.
393:
278:...the reason why I changed the tag on the page was not to create some POV fork ... but rather (and apparently naively) in the hopes that it would bring the two parties to some mutual agreement...
1191:
He actually hasn't, and in my opinion that explanation of his is more along the lines of a collection of information for an excuse to do what he is doing as freely as he wishes. Look, at least
548:
often used as a tool to act unilaterally, and yes, I've been reverted to the "consensus version." Man, all of these masks are making me start to feel like I'm in an 16th century court.
1012:
I suggest that you link to Durin's fair use overuse explanation when pulling such images from article space, it'll help explain in more detail the reasons for the removals.
936:
I'm not going to disagree with that, and I totally understand the frustration and concern. Unfortunately, though, in the end, when the
Foundation speaks, we must adhere.
750:
He has messed up my user page, images on them, and my plans for making my user page messed up!He constantly picks on me! Starting from now, I never want here the name "
456:
Heya David, I just wanted to drop a note saying I'm glad we can get along in respect to IAR. :) Also, sorry for being an ass a few weeks ago (I was having a bad week).
1071:
840:
Profet, fair use IS non-free. "Fair use" doesn't mean we get to use it anywhere we like. Fair use materials are still copyrighted, and not available under a
535:
300:
216:
I agree with your reversion. I'd appreciate any resources to help me determine when good faith ends, so that I can become a better editor. Thanks! -
1201:
one was there (I don't count the ones in the corner, it is required that they exist so that would limit the number to a rather strict two) on the
1206:
1139:
1093:
1400:, and I'm going to take it on board as per comments made in the AfD. It would be good, if you have time, to keep an eye on it. Regards, --
1411:
237:
1566:
1525:
1478:
1436:
1355:
1317:
1258:
1176:
1120:
1046:
951:
906:
805:
733:
662:
615:
563:
511:
471:
421:
375:
323:
259:
193:
145:
118:
1397:
1284:
1153:
849:
685:
587:
64:
59:
1157:
1080:
4.) "Please do not revert the edit again as it will eventually result in your editing privileges being revoked." whatever.
1453:
Don't know why you have your aim set on Josh Gotti, but if Tracy Foster is one of his socks, Teddy Bairz probably is too.
993:
927:
878:
1243:
Simple formatting issues -- it should be fixed now. Sorry I didn't get to it sooner, but I was out of town last week. :)
887:
That's actually an interesting question. I don't see why not, though the person who will be able to tell you for sure is
1083:
You have caught me in a bad mood. I do not think I will understand what your doing. You removed image from a GA article
1074:. I could have sworn it was tagged as just beeing an essay. Your assuming I will use ignoring rule it in any situation.
848:
for a sampling of this work. The
Wikimedia Foundation has taken a stance against overuse of fair use images. Please see
790:. Durin was acting within policy, and his actions were completely justified. Sorry, but that's that. End of discussion.
629:
680:
600:
Yep, and unfortunately neither Warner nor Virgin is looking to sign right now (which isn't surprising, I suppose).
582:
38:
350:. I can't find where the Help desk archive page for that day has gone, so I can't update the original question. --
845:
1197:
918:
in terms of
Knowledge content than having one concise article with an image for each character, but that's me.
844:. Overuse of fair use images is being cleaned up across a broad variety of articles on the project. Please see
156:
No, if AGF had gone out of the window it would have been indefinite. Like I said, I'm giving people a break.
1407:
1148:
I understand the issue at hand. That said, the images are still in violation both of
Knowledge's policy for
856:
strongly encourages minimal use of such images. If you have questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. --
1541:
1500:
1088:
231:
534:
Now I'm not sure what the moral of the story is, but I think it involves always wearing pants. Cheers, --
47:
17:
1202:
227:
103:
This is perhaps the most boring application of a block I've seen thus far. And from you, Guy? Please.
981:
637:
397:
1402:
869:
In place of non-free images, can the URLs of the source images be placed in articles as links?
1463:
Thanks for this! I'm in the process of compiling a case against Josh for ongoing vandalism. :)
1214:
There's no policy that suggests that three fair use images per article is acceptable. Sorry. --
1537:
1496:
1013:
989:
923:
874:
1552:
1511:
1464:
1422:
1341:
1332:
1303:
1292:
1244:
1162:
1106:
1032:
937:
892:
791:
756:
719:
648:
601:
549:
497:
457:
407:
361:
309:
245:
217:
179:
131:
104:
1234:
831:
707:
488:
439:
351:
347:
483:
No worries! I'm glad that we're able to work together, and I hope that the situation at
1067:
support just removing alot images. I do not they will do anything good in the long run.
1572:
1545:
1531:
1504:
1484:
1457:
1442:
1415:
1390:
1384:
1381:
1361:
1335:
1323:
1295:
1264:
1237:
1218:
1209:
1182:
1149:
1142:
1126:
1098:
1052:
1025:
971:
957:
931:
912:
882:
860:
853:
834:
827:
811:
759:
739:
712:
691:
668:
640:
621:
593:
569:
538:
517:
491:
477:
446:
427:
400:
381:
354:
329:
303:
265:
220:
199:
169:
151:
124:
97:
718:
No problem! I didn't know about it either until I saw it used on the BDJ arb case. :)
787:
783:
484:
241:
164:
158:
92:
86:
1328:
Unchanged for months? That is not remotely what I see when I look at the history.
985:
919:
870:
841:
1329:
1289:
1084:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
438:
I don't think they can. If you let me know which article, I can check for you.
178:. You should know this block was unjustified, as what I did was not vandalism.
1215:
968:
888:
857:
751:
704:
1077:
3.) Please do not use "Thanks, and have a great day". Those things annoy me.
1285:
Wikipedia_talk:Ignore_all_rules#New_version_about_.22working_with_others.22
978:
Hmmmm...alright, I'll see what I can do about working with this. Thanks!
703:
I didn't know we had a template for that. Thanks for picking up my slack.
1454:
406:
Thanks for the note -- I'll give my opinion in the next couple of days!
1380:
But thanks for reminding me, I'll go and report the thing. See ya! -
226:
Thanks for the note! It's not that I assumed bad faith on the part of
823:
1495:
Please archive your talk page rather than delete stuff, okay? --
1031:
Good call -- I'll definitely start doing that in the future. :)
531:
is muddy (what's this river that I'm in) but I think you have.
1070:
2.) I just followed what
Ignoring rules says; I tend to ignore
396:. If you could drop by and give your opinion that'd be great.--
822:
Yester day August 27th, you have removed image links from all
174:
What from? You have edited the IAR talk page in the same way,
84:
I've given everyone a day off from your ridiculous behaviour.
25:
1087:. What was the point of that? It still reached GA class.
1551:
Therefore, they are often not archived. Hope that helps.
1138:
mabye Diana, Halloween, Peta, Ian, Rolan, Ash, and Loco.
240:), but rather that what he/she added was in violation of
1233:
Why did you undo my addition to the Do or Die page? BT--
1276:
779:
775:
772:
769:
766:
343:
290:
175:
967:
an image is unusual and would probably be removed. --
283:
Oh, was that it? Hmm. Was I invited to either party?
496:Amen. That would sure be nice... (crosses fingers)
1510:Most Wikipedians don't archive template messages.
1396:A came across the AfD for this while writing up
487:is resolved via community-wide consensus. :) —
544:Crap, you've got another good point. Consensus
8:
1491:Please use archive not delete on talk page
1008:Justification for fair use image removals
1072:Knowledge:What "Ignore all rules" means
679:thanks anyways u were a big help!!..=]
850:Foundation:Resolution:Licensing policy
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
826:-related article in accordance with
754:" ever again! And that's final : -->
630:Talk:Jocelyne Couture-Nowak#Clean-up
584:me + ma sis luv us sum Pretty Ricky!
767:"tyrannical policy-obssesed idiot,"
536:Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri
301:Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri
1156:. I know you've been told to read
818:Excessive use of fair use images ?
765:By attacks I mean calling Durin a
682:u cant stop me + ma sis we genius!
24:
1207:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares
1140:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares
694:ps i am a little dissapointed now
1421:I'll put it on my watchlist! :)
392:I've nominated him for deletion
29:
1398:There is Some Fun Going Forward
852:. Also, our fair use policy at
1385:19:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
1362:22:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
1336:20:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
1324:20:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
1296:16:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
996:) 12:33, August 29, 2007 (UTC)
782:You were flagrantly violating
1:
1546:02:14, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
1532:17:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
1505:04:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
1265:05:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
1158:Durin's excellent explanation
1573:07:07, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
1485:21:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1458:21:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1443:00:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
1416:22:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
1238:14:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
1219:21:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
1210:21:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
1183:21:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
1143:21:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
1127:21:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
1099:20:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
1053:19:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
1026:19:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
972:12:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
958:19:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
932:19:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
913:19:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
883:19:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
861:13:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
846:User:Durin/Fair Use Overuse
835:09:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
812:21:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
760:21:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
740:18:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
713:18:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
692:02:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
1593:
1196:not soon enough) that the
746:What do you mean attacks!?
669:16:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
641:12:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
622:18:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
594:02:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
570:17:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
539:16:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
518:22:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
492:21:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
478:18:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
447:18:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
428:00:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
401:00:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
382:16:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
355:16:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
330:16:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
304:16:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
200:22:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
170:22:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
152:18:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
125:17:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
98:17:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
1340:Close to two months. :)
1198:List of Akatsuki members
266:00:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
221:00:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
1154:Foundation's principles
780:hope he sits on a tack.
344:your Help desk question
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Rockstar915
1283:being discussed at
1235:Can-eh-dian Redhead
1375:re: Quick question
1203:Chess Pieces (MÄR)
1095:JUSTICE IS SERVED!
1570:
1529:
1482:
1440:
1359:
1321:
1262:
1180:
1124:
1050:
997:
984:comment added by
955:
910:
809:
737:
699:Courtesy blanking
666:
619:
567:
526:IAR and consensus
515:
475:
445:
425:
379:
360:Woo hoo! Thanks!
327:
263:
197:
168:
149:
122:
96:
77:
76:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1584:
1563:
1560:
1557:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1475:
1472:
1469:
1433:
1430:
1427:
1352:
1349:
1346:
1314:
1311:
1308:
1279:was wise. This
1255:
1252:
1249:
1173:
1170:
1167:
1150:non-free content
1117:
1114:
1111:
1096:
1091:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1023:
1018:
979:
948:
945:
942:
903:
900:
897:
802:
799:
796:
730:
727:
724:
710:
688:
683:
659:
656:
653:
612:
609:
606:
590:
585:
560:
557:
554:
508:
505:
502:
468:
465:
462:
444:
442:
418:
415:
412:
372:
369:
366:
342:In reference to
320:
317:
314:
256:
253:
250:
190:
187:
184:
162:
142:
139:
136:
115:
112:
109:
90:
73:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1569:
1558:
1553:
1528:
1517:
1512:
1493:
1481:
1470:
1465:
1451:
1439:
1428:
1423:
1394:
1377:
1358:
1347:
1342:
1320:
1309:
1304:
1273:
1261:
1250:
1245:
1231:
1179:
1168:
1163:
1135:
1123:
1112:
1107:
1094:
1089:
1061:
1049:
1038:
1033:
1019:
1014:
1010:
954:
943:
938:
909:
898:
893:
820:
808:
797:
792:
778:and saying you
748:
736:
725:
720:
708:
701:
686:
681:
677:
665:
654:
649:
638:gorgan_almighty
633:
618:
607:
602:
588:
583:
578:
566:
555:
550:
528:
514:
503:
498:
474:
463:
458:
454:
440:
436:
424:
413:
408:
390:
378:
367:
362:
340:
338:Main HTML color
326:
315:
310:
274:
262:
251:
246:
214:
196:
185:
180:
148:
137:
132:
121:
110:
105:
82:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1590:
1588:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1565:
1524:
1492:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1477:
1450:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1435:
1393:
1391:Tractor (band)
1388:
1376:
1373:
1371:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1354:
1316:
1272:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1257:
1230:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1186:
1185:
1175:
1134:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1119:
1060:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1045:
1009:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
975:
974:
963:
962:
961:
960:
950:
905:
864:
863:
819:
816:
815:
814:
804:
747:
744:
743:
742:
732:
700:
697:
687:(wat waz dat?)
676:
673:
672:
671:
661:
632:
626:
625:
624:
614:
589:(wat waz dat?)
577:
574:
573:
572:
562:
527:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
510:
470:
453:
450:
435:
432:
431:
430:
420:
398:CyberGhostface
389:
386:
385:
384:
374:
339:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
322:
293:
292:
281:
280:
273:
270:
269:
268:
258:
213:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
192:
144:
117:
81:
78:
75:
74:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1589:
1574:
1568:
1561:
1556:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1527:
1520:
1515:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1490:
1486:
1480:
1473:
1468:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1456:
1448:
1444:
1438:
1431:
1426:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1404:
1403:Rodhullandemu
1399:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1386:
1383:
1374:
1372:
1363:
1357:
1350:
1345:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1334:
1331:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1319:
1312:
1307:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1294:
1291:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1275:I'm not sure
1270:
1266:
1260:
1253:
1248:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1228:
1220:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1208:
1204:
1199:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1184:
1178:
1171:
1166:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1141:
1132:
1128:
1122:
1115:
1110:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1097:
1092:
1086:
1081:
1078:
1075:
1073:
1068:
1066:
1058:
1054:
1048:
1041:
1036:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1017:
1007:
995:
991:
987:
983:
977:
976:
973:
970:
965:
964:
959:
953:
946:
941:
935:
934:
933:
929:
925:
921:
916:
915:
914:
908:
901:
896:
890:
886:
885:
884:
880:
876:
872:
868:
867:
866:
865:
862:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
838:
837:
836:
833:
829:
825:
817:
813:
807:
800:
795:
789:
785:
781:
777:
776:"wiki-bully,"
774:
771:
768:
764:
763:
762:
761:
758:
753:
745:
741:
735:
728:
723:
717:
716:
715:
714:
711:
706:
698:
696:
695:
693:
689:
684:
674:
670:
664:
657:
652:
645:
644:
643:
642:
639:
631:
627:
623:
617:
610:
605:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
591:
586:
575:
571:
565:
558:
553:
547:
543:
542:
541:
540:
537:
532:
525:
519:
513:
506:
501:
495:
494:
493:
490:
486:
482:
481:
480:
479:
473:
466:
461:
451:
449:
448:
443:
433:
429:
423:
416:
411:
405:
404:
403:
402:
399:
395:
387:
383:
377:
370:
365:
359:
358:
357:
356:
353:
349:
345:
337:
331:
325:
318:
313:
307:
306:
305:
302:
298:
295:
294:
291:
289:
286:
285:
284:
279:
276:
275:
271:
267:
261:
254:
249:
243:
239:
236:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
211:
201:
195:
188:
183:
177:
173:
172:
171:
166:
161:
160:
155:
154:
153:
147:
140:
135:
128:
127:
126:
120:
113:
108:
102:
101:
100:
99:
94:
89:
88:
79:
72:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1554:
1538:Busy Stubber
1513:
1497:Busy Stubber
1494:
1466:
1452:
1424:
1401:
1395:
1378:
1370:
1343:
1305:
1280:
1274:
1246:
1232:
1192:
1164:
1136:
1133:Chess Pieces
1108:
1090:THROUGH FIRE
1082:
1079:
1076:
1069:
1064:
1062:
1034:
1020:
1015:
1011:
939:
894:
842:free license
821:
793:
749:
721:
702:
690:
678:
650:
634:
603:
592:
579:
551:
545:
533:
529:
499:
459:
455:
437:
409:
391:
388:Nick Palumbo
363:
341:
311:
296:
287:
282:
277:
247:
234:
228:Punk krunk14
215:
181:
176:if not worse
157:
133:
106:
85:
83:
70:
43:
37:
1536:Why not? --
1085:Sailor Moon
980:—Preceding
757:Angel David
755:___<! --
218:Superbeecat
212:Corbin Bleu
36:This is an
1449:Josh Gotti
1271:IAR revert
832:Profet 666
628:Regarding
489:David Levy
452:IAR and me
441:SlimVirgin
434:Your query
352:Teratornis
308:Woo hoo!!
1229:Do or Die
1205:article.
773:"vandal,"
71:Archive 3
65:Archive 2
60:Archive 1
1412:contribs
1152:and the
994:contribs
982:unsigned
928:contribs
879:contribs
348:WP:COLOR
238:contribs
80:Time out
986:Willbyr
920:Willbyr
871:Willbyr
854:WP:NFCC
828:WP:NFCC
770:"flea,"
346:, see:
297:Support
272:Mwahaha
39:archive
1333:(talk)
1330:Friday
1293:(talk)
1290:Friday
1065:do not
1063:1.) I
1021:Sphere
1016:Broken
788:WP:CIV
784:WP:NPA
485:WP:IAR
242:WP:BLP
1216:Durin
1193:THINK
969:Durin
891:. :)
889:Durin
858:Durin
752:Durin
675:oh ok
165:Help!
93:Help!
16:<
1559:star
1555:Rock
1542:talk
1518:star
1514:Rock
1501:talk
1471:star
1467:Rock
1429:star
1425:Rock
1408:talk
1348:star
1344:Rock
1310:star
1306:Rock
1277:this
1251:star
1247:Rock
1169:star
1165:Rock
1113:star
1109:Rock
1039:star
1035:Rock
990:talk
944:star
940:Rock
924:talk
899:star
895:Rock
875:talk
798:star
794:Rock
786:and
726:star
722:Rock
705:Wily
655:star
651:Rock
608:star
604:Rock
556:star
552:Rock
504:star
500:Rock
464:star
460:Rock
414:star
410:Rock
394:here
368:star
364:Rock
316:star
312:Rock
252:star
248:Rock
232:talk
186:star
182:Rock
138:star
134:Rock
111:star
107:Rock
1455:Kww
1059:RE:
824:MÄR
576:Hey
159:Guy
87:Guy
1571:)
1544:)
1530:)
1503:)
1483:)
1441:)
1414:)
1410:-
1382:eo
1360:)
1322:)
1281:is
1263:)
1181:)
1125:)
1051:)
992:•
956:)
930:)
926:|
911:)
881:)
877:|
810:)
738:)
667:)
620:)
568:)
546:is
516:)
476:)
426:)
380:)
328:)
299:--
264:)
198:)
150:)
123:)
1567:C
1564:/
1562:(
1540:(
1526:C
1523:/
1521:(
1499:(
1479:C
1476:/
1474:(
1437:C
1434:/
1432:(
1406:(
1356:C
1353:/
1351:(
1318:C
1315:/
1313:(
1259:C
1256:/
1254:(
1177:C
1174:/
1172:(
1121:C
1118:/
1116:(
1047:C
1044:/
1042:(
988:(
952:C
949:/
947:(
922:(
907:C
904:/
902:(
873:(
806:C
803:/
801:(
734:C
731:/
729:(
709:D
663:C
660:/
658:(
636:—
616:C
613:/
611:(
564:C
561:/
559:(
512:C
509:/
507:(
472:C
469:/
467:(
422:C
419:/
417:(
376:C
373:/
371:(
324:C
321:/
319:(
260:C
257:/
255:(
235:·
230:(
194:C
191:/
189:(
167:)
163:(
146:C
143:/
141:(
119:C
116:/
114:(
95:)
91:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.