User talk:RogerK - Knowledge (XXG)

1460:

are no longer interested in Knowledge (XXG). This place takes really thick skin I know, people are so incredibly rude. No matter how much work I put into an article I always get told by some one that it is worthless.But, taking on the the enormous task of trying to please everyone has helped my writing abilities in leaps and bounds. I can churn out a good ten page paper for my classes in three hours tops now. I also see that over time the new rules of Knowledge (XXG) are helping it become a more legitimate and recognized reference source. Even the demands they are making on Dogpatch USA seem pretty legit to me. Most of it did come from only one source and articles need multiple sources and to be well cited to be representable of the best of the best of Knowledge (XXG). If you ever want to come back and help me on any articles, I promise civility. Thanks again.

1354:". It is clear to me that as long as "pioneer", for example, is briefly defined in the Franz article by his full-time evangelizing, it fits this guideline. Incase a reader found even these brief descriptions insufficient, I included links to the organizational structure article where they are defined. But to broadly avoid any JW-specific terms, we could not include the term "Governing Body" but would always have to refer to some "cardinal-like council of men similar to Roman Catholicism", where I prefer to keep the former because it is verbosely explained in another Wiki, whereas the later would require a reader to cite "cardinal", "council", "Roman Catholics" etc. So, if we editors abstract JW articles to a kind of meta-religious nomenclature, then our readers could, I believe, be confused about what is specific to JW's versus any other religion. 154:. Most (although not all) of the editors who commented agreed, some very strongly, that the article would be improved by converting this paragraph to the simple past. Armed with the knowledge that other editors agreed with me, I made the changes. I want to make it clear that I do not believe that this grammatical construction to be incorrect, only that in this case, the article would be improved by describing the events in a simpler grammatical construction. I understand that it is accepted in journalistic and literary circles. We are working on an encyclopedia, however. 1022:? You're taking things a little bit too hard... I have already cited the policy, it says to generally use thumbnail images. Of course, it also says that setting it is acceptable. Therefore, none of the positions are "wrong" or "unacceptable", as it is general practice here to use thumbnail images instead of setting the pixel size. Might I suggest you a little break from this issue until you're not stressed anymore? Also, is the only discussion going on at 367:. It's just a waste: instead of contributing to the encyclopedia, we're running around after one another with this notification or the other. That really frustrates me, so I just try my best to stay away from jobs like that. I like to help other editors become enthusiastic about WP though; that's why I answer Qs on the help desk - to try and short circuit that inevitable newbie frustration. Too many editors here have forgotten what it was like, I think. 1598: 1508: 1363:

to be vague about who compiled these articles by passively saying they went to the book; your version places the collection of articles on Knorr. So to be a cited statement, I think we should replace the terminology "collected" with "assigned" and only mention the 'head of the Writing Department' as giving the assignments. Otherwise it's our opinion, especially in regards the structure of the organzation (which the

2647: 2539: 2479: 2423: 2367: 2120: 2060: 1957: 1854: 1751: 1689: 859:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 353:, I would say that they intend to use that when an editor has uploaded an image without any copyright information at all, someone else has wandered across it, checked it for basic copyvios (like, it's not a logo, or obviously copyrighted), and they think that the editor took/created the image themselves, but didn't understand enough about the process to state that. 2498:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2442:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2386:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2139:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2079:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1385:, sounds great! I feel it should be pasted into the article. (Hint, hint) Finally, about the 'editors who want it done their way': I am more of a writer than an editor, so I am not too disturbed by some Wikipedians preferring Raymond over Ray or other disputes of form. To get in fights of form and style would be the wrong battle, for me at least. 771:

realize that you had also left a message. Anyway, I'm honored that you asked. It's a little late tonight, but I will make it a priority tomorrow. I did take a quick glance and, content-wise, it looks like a very-well developed and formatted article. If I have anything else to add tomorrow, I will leave a message on the talk page there.--

1338:

a religion? The Dominican case would be a good citation, if anyone could find whether the Watchtower corporations were banned or any person professing to be a JW were banned, or, as I feel (but have no evidence) the Catholic Church convinced the Dominican government to ban JW's, both members and incorporations, as a competing

363:- placing templates, contacting uploaders - a lot of these niceties, that would always be carried out if the workload wasn't so big, fall by the wayside. And goodfaith editors such as yourself are left totally perplexed. One thing that makes me angry is how much manual labour is carried out by editors when I just think, 493:

is going to be introduced sometime, I don't know when. You'll be able to give "ratings" to each version of an article. So it is likely that FAs would have a lot of high ratings. Then, if the article was later edited and became messier, it would get lower ratings. I guess it means people would be able

185:

More generally, there was a lot of wordy and grandiolquent language in the article that other editors and I had removed and you have added back in, such as "unforeseen events transform the high hopes of investors into a financial roller coaster ride which eventually ended in the park's demise." This,

1357:

Secondly, I am concerned about edits to cited statements, specifically edits that are more than grammatical. For example, I originally wrote that Franz "submitted a great number of biblical topics to the encyclopedia" and you revised this as "submitted a great number of biblical topics to Knorr for

1345:

Later, your revisions removed "publisher", "pioneer", and "branch overseer" and, although I see your point on terminology, I only included them so readers could watch Franz's progression through the hierachial organization. Also, I included a brief description of what these terms meant or how Franz

1337:

replacing my use of the word "religion" with "religious group". I find this latter term awkward because it sounds like a politically correct way to say "sect". I am not certain whether JW's are listed by the U.S. or other governments as a sect or cult, so why not call simply call Franz a member of

1329:

My first concern is nomenclature. I want the article to be readable by non-JW's so, generally, I thought it best to write "religion" for anything not specific to JW's and "organization" for anything specific to Watchtower things. An anonymous user applied my general rule when they edited "was born

1114:

It's true that a lot of FAs use fixed pixel images. If you think setting it is the best way, I think the primary way to solving this would be to step back and let you fix it, as the policy is not defined, but we still should continue the discussion before unilaterally changing it. Leave a message at

165:

Knowledge (XXG) is an international encyclopedia. The people who read it have different backgrounds, education and worldview from you. Try to make your article accessible to as many of them as possible. The reader is probably reading the article to learn. It's quite possible the reader knows nothing

1380:

Sorry for the delay; I took a small vacation :) In response to your suggestions from 29 June 2006 (UTC), "religion" sounds preferable to "religious group", and I will just drop JW specific terms from now on (although I disagree). Missionary, luckily, is generic enough for the Franz article. And,

1362:

again but cannot find Franz attributing the collection or compilation to anyone, although he does say, in footnote 22 of Ch. 2 "The five of us recieved our assignments of subjects through Karl Adams, then the head of the Writing Department." So both our versions are incorrect: my version attempted

959:

Hi RogerK! I saw your case at the Mediation Cabal and I'd be willing to mediate it, but first I'd like you to at least contact Mel and say (in a complete list) what you disagree with, to give a chance for him to give you a detailed explanation and (hopefully) solve the conflict before we get to the

1459:

Hi, thanks for responding. I didn't realize that you had tried to communicate and I never responded. My life as a college student is usually very hectic and I tend to let things go a long time without dealing with them quite often. That's probably what happened. I'm really sorry. Sorry to hear you

145:

But back to my copyediting. A day or two ago you reverted a bunch of changes that I and others had made, without paying much attention, it seemed to me, to whether or not those edits improved the article. For example, you put "Dogpatch USA" back in italics in several instances (but not all). I can

1480:

Thanks a lot for complements on my writing, I'm glad you like it. Most of the complaints on citation seem to stem from the organization. I've done my best to learn the style of foot notes but it's still not good enough for FA apparently. Also, the article just needs some new eyes to proofread and

1442:

Hey Roger, haven't heard from you in a while. Anyway, I've been notified that Dogpatch might be in trouble of loosing FA status because "standards have risen" since it was promoted. There seems to be a problem with the way the citations are done. I'm really terrible with that part, but I remember

1035:

Also, admins here are not like admins on other sites. I mean, normally, on the other sites, admins are a few (three/two max) hand-picked users who take over the site. At WP, adminshp is just about having handy tools. Next time you see an admin, just ignore that fact. He can't abuse his authority,

320:

understand where you are coming from. Being lost in gibberish seems to be an integral part of immersing oneself in WP. There are many, many issues where I have just gone around in circles, pleaded on Talk pages for explanations, mostly to no avail. What do I do? Usually, let it go, and get myself

737:

It seems quite good, but I am not at all familiar with FA or peer review, so I can't say what its chances might be. I would move the lead image to the right (looks more standard) and there's a couple of footnotes that appear in the text rather than as footnotes, so they need fixing. And this has

141:

in order to help improve. Most of my copyediting was relatively minor -- punctuation, simplifying wording, etc. All in all, I think it is an excellenet article, and I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. As an aside, that is one of the joys of Knowledge (XXG): being exposed to information that one is

770:

Please accept my sincere apologies, Roger. I never noticed your first invitation. To make a long story short, on that day I was having a "discussion" with another user who likes to use vulgar profanities in talk pages and when I logged on that day, I only noticed his return message and didn't

149:

Most importantly, you restored the use of "would" to express past events. This was an issue on which I tread more carefully because I know that it is acceptable and preferable in some circumstances to use this construction. I canvassed other editors by posting a question on the Knowledge (XXG)

705:

Clearly I have been unable to communicate my intentions to you. A hastily written post to a talk page should not cloud your judgement though, as a non-professional writer I find tone very hard to convey in writing. Believe it or not, I contribute in good faith as well. As I said though,

146:

see no reason why this would be italicized since it is not the title of a book, movie, etc. You also reverted the change from "negative income" to "loss". I restored this because I think that the business terminology would be unclear to many readers, and a simpler term is available.

296:, which will explain what further information you should put on the image description page, to explain why the image is fair use. Lots of editors don't put this rationale, although strictly they should. If you put it, it will maximise the chances of your image not being deleted. :) 694:

Roger, hi, how are you. Nice to meet you. Please don't pull out the arbitration card right away. Arbitration is a last resort once all other options are exhausted. You do what you like, of course. But let's start out on a better footing. Look forward to hearing from you.

186:

to me, is no encyclopedic in tone. I left most of it in, however, because you clearly feel very strongly about it. I made the tense change, however, because I fell very strongly that it makes the article clearer to the reader, and there was no need for it here.

1330:

and raised into the Jehovah's Witness religion". Obviously, that's awkward wordin ; I prefer your reversion "was born in 1922 and raised as a third-generation Jehovah's Witness". So it seems my general rule is flawed and wonder what should be our guide.

896:

Generally you should not assume an image is under a free license or available for free use, unless you see an explicit notice from the copyright-holder stating as much. Copyrighted images can still be used under the fair use rationale. You'll have to read

652:

Hi Roger. I see you spell Loung Ung's mother's name with "Chourng" as opposed to "Choung". It says "Choung" in the book, doesn't it? Oh, and I don't really care what the caption says, but I do think that it's, perhaps, a tad wordy at this point.

338:, but I still think the explanations are not very clear and the process is misguided - how many users come back to see the answers to their questions? not too many, I think); trying to find out which bugs are features and which features are bugs... 343:

I often think that the WP namespace should not be editable by just anyone. They should just form a committee, and have them be responsible, and just overhaul the whole fricking thing. Or the Help/tutorial pages at least. They're just dense and

1481:

rearrange prose. I have tried getting people to read it but it is very hard. The reason even I put it in FA was to try and get people interested. Some people have actually done some editing, it isn't as hopeless as when I was working on the

525:

Hi. It's my pleasure to talk to you again. It's a one-way street, though. Apologies? I doubt it. You certainly owe me one. But I don't expect to get it, 'cause I don't think you care about "little people" here on Knowledge (XXG), the

202:

Roger, please accept my apologies. have been rude in not responding to you. An election has been called in Canada, and I have been spending most of my time on issues related to that. Let me respond to a few of your comments:

592:

Looks like you've got it sussed now. Images from commons don't need to be "imported" - you can treat them as if they were uploaded locally. That's the beauty of the commons! If you need any more specifci help let me know.

358:

Man, don't even get me started on deletions. Like the image that you uploaded that got deleted. Had the admin contacted you, this could have been sorted a week ago. But because all these stupid processes are carried out

221:

I restored "negative income" because I felt that "loss" was very ambiguous; loss of what? I would prefer "financial loss" or some such phrase if it must be changed to accomodate those less likely to understand business

807:. Knowledge (XXG) gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge (XXG), the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an 815:

indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

609:

Hm, having not seen the film, I'm not sure how well I can comment. :) Before nominating for FAC, I would compare it to some articles on films that have already been featured, so you have an idea of the standard.

2325:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1619:

in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1529:

1658:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on

1568:

229:

Hmmm... I see you point about "loss" being ambiguous. The problem that I have with "negative income" is that it is an oxymoron, and sounds very much like business jargon. "Financial loss" would be a clearer

334:

Some circles I have travelled in: Trying to find the right noticeboard to contact an admin (there are at least three); trying to find the right Help page to ask for help on (I guess I have settled on

244:

And I think "grandiloquence" was an unfair characterization on my part. There probably should be room for more creative language in Knowledge (XXG), especially in an article about an amusement park.

151: 1721:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1420: 953: 432:

Are you sure? I can see three images! And the page history shows that you are the only person to have edited the page since 28 December. Maybe the images didn't load the first time?

1181:. The images do seem to me not to be aesthetically pleasing, and they're much larger than the recommended max of 250px. However, you have to solve this issue with Mel, not with me. 498:. There have been a few proposals for various ways to "freeze" articles once they reach featured status, but so far none of them have captured the collective imagination, it seems. 1326:'s page. We were editing on top of each other yesterday, aye? ;) I had a few concerns about reverting my edits and decided your Talk page would be a good place to discuss them. 1717:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1026:? Could you cite the reasons why you want to use fixed px images? I thought mediation was premature when you first requested it, and arbitration would be even more premature. 663:

This is sad. It is nice to meet you also... thanks for some of your user templates on ur user page... I have incorporated them into my 'template archive' on my user page.

394:

If you ever have any other WP Qs, you are welcome of course to leave a note on my Talk page. There are lots of things I still have no clue about, but I will always try...

1443:

that you were really good at it. Was wondering if you are not still on hiatus, if you would take a look at it. Also, if you wouldn't mind checking out my latest article

2252: 2219: 2186: 1423:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 2285: 1984:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1881:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1778:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

372:

I think I have a reasonable grasp on the image issues now, though. That's after several weeks of intensive reading, re-reading and re-re-reading the relevant pages.

1710:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1980:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1877:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1774:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1706:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 466:. At any rate, I will add a Non-free fair use in tag to the book cover image, and then they will all be perfect and should not have any excuse to be deleted. :) 178:

Reduce every sentence to its essentials. Wordiness has no place in Knowledge (XXG). Conciseness, however, does not justify removing information from an article.

1347: 567: 171: 158: 1652: 1562: 1077:(on 800x600 resolution). The left one is the thumb, the right one is the fixed size image. Can this get the biggest point on using thumb images through? 300: 96: 1631: 1541: 2708: 2600: 2510: 2454: 2398: 2290:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2257:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2224:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2191:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2151: 2091: 1726: 80: 495: 1670: 1580: 882: 839: 56:

to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

721:

That article is locked down to payed subsribers of the paper but, that is the link to the article and it does include the quotes I cited. --

2350: 1665:. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our 1575:. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our 738:

nothing much to do with the article, but try and link some longer phrases to more specific articles rather than really generic links like

100: 17: 812: 293: 28:

article, and your willingness to go above and beyond for the sake of free knowledge and correct grammer and punctiuation. On behalf of

635:

I see you've added the information that Loung Ung "is contemplating a third ". How did you come across this information, may I ask?

462:

tag means the image should only be used on an article on the book (rather than on the author). But this is also not followed strictly

1703: 2712: 2604: 871: 828: 808: 442:

BTW, good job on tagging the images. I added the "fair use rationale" for the two pictures of her (which is necessary whenever the

540:

I'm afraid that I have no idea what this is about, nor what you want. You seem to be concerned with some long-ago reference to

137:

Roger, I see that you are a relatively new editor, so let me add my welcome. Some time ago I did a fairly extensive copyedit to

2346: 919: 760: 620: 2281: 2248: 2215: 2182: 65: 53: 838:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at 321:

lost in a different corner of the 'pedia. There are so many facets to editing here. I have become pretty heavily involved in

2700: 2658: 2636: 2592: 2550: 2528: 2494:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2438:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2382:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2135:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2075:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1972:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1869:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1766:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1616: 1526: 1370:

So on these two points, namely, editing cited statements and nomenclature, I hope to reach some agreement. Kindest regard,

470: 99:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

530:

like me, as you so aptly put it. At any rate, thank you for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG). Your fellow Wikipedian,

936:

Thanks for your message. I had a look at the article, and made a few minor changes, but generally it looks fine to me. --

904: 446: 280: 2704: 2687: 2596: 2499: 2443: 2387: 2140: 2080: 1985: 1882: 1779: 1711: 866: 823: 1718: 214:

Apology accepted. We all make mistakes, especially when just starting out in Knowledge (XXG). I certainly made mistakes.

2337:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

85: 2342: 182:

Using the simple past here is less confusing for readers, especially for those for whom English is a second language.

1698:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 677:)! After reading the book I was planning to locate the places on my own, but then found the page and then the image. 2654: 2640: 1651:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,

1561:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,

1597: 1507: 1074: 207:"I did this by pasting and editing excerpts from my archived copies of the article.... My apologies for that :)), 60: 490: 92: 2579: 2490: 2434: 1554: 785:

I posted my peer review five days ago, as soon as I saw your note. In fact it was: 01:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

1644: 386:(especially helpful when you can't locate that useful page you know you've seen, but forget the name of...) 2295: 2262: 2229: 2196: 541: 2716: 2608: 2338: 1350:

guide as instances of the line: "Avoid phrases that are unique to Jehovah's Witnesses that haven't been

1286: 1237: 1188: 1143: 1084: 1047: 997: 967: 754:. Google can help you find such articles by including the search term "site:en.wikipedia.org". Regards, 614:

might be a good one. It is significantly longer, that is one thing that will probably be brought up...

255: 194: 2546: 2532: 2277: 2244: 2211: 2178: 2131: 2071: 1968: 1762: 1612: 1535: 1522: 1517: 898: 855: 847: 269: 75: 2378: 1694: 1625: 1607: 1416: 804: 2734: 2626: 2161: 2101: 1227: 941: 549: 389:

When it gets too frustrating, drop it, leave it, go find another unrelated corner to poke around in .

2314: 2305: 1398:

but I am checking it out again to continue the article. Thanks for responding ... faster than me

1178: 772: 2334: 2318: 1977: 1874: 1771: 645:

Hi Roger. Thanks for the prompt response. I am a registered member. My user talk page is here:

790: 707: 696: 688: 456: 112: 107:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --

2724: 2683: 2616: 2575: 2291: 2258: 2225: 2192: 2043: 2030: 1940: 1927: 1837: 1824: 1482: 914: 755: 674: 615: 611: 594: 506: 474: 433: 413: 400: 307: 2330: 2322: 1981: 1878: 1775: 1707: 1037: 189:

I hope that my explanation of my changes enables you to understand why I made them. Regards,

1956: 1865: 1853: 1750: 326: 251: 190: 2670: 2562: 2333:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2326: 1998: 1895: 1792: 1666: 1653:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license

1576: 1563:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license

502: 350: 274:

Under U.S. copyright law, almost all work published after 1922 may have an active copyright

2730: 2622: 2518: 2462: 2406: 2155: 2095: 2026: 1923: 1820: 1734: 1494: 1467: 1448: 1399: 1371: 937: 722: 545: 124: 33: 2495: 2439: 2383: 2136: 2076: 1973: 1870: 1767: 1699: 335: 325:. I find it is generally a lot clearer, probably because it hasn't had time to build up 123:

Thanks for fixing my user page up to so I don't look so much like an illiterate dummy.--

1674: 1584: 1279:

OK, we can wait for his reply. My suggestion for a break is still valid, for instance.

1116: 1023: 987: 878: 835: 2669:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

2561:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

1323: 751: 747: 706:

ultimately, you do what you like, whatever that might encompass, goes with saying. --

108: 70: 2004:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

1901:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

1798:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

2039: 1936: 1833: 1364: 731: 664: 654: 636: 603: 571: 425: 382:

WP search is useless. Use google search restricted to WP by including this phrase:

237:

And finally, my use of grandiloquence in the introduction was not intended as such.

138: 25: 1688: 250:

Again, please forgive my tardiness in responding. Keep up the good work. Regards,

29: 793: 452:

tag is used; this is not very strictly followed, though). Strictly speaking, the

1425: 1293: 1281: 1244: 1232: 1195: 1183: 1150: 1138: 1091: 1079: 1054: 1042: 1004: 992: 974: 962: 579: 531: 527: 16: 2514: 2458: 2402: 1730: 1036:

because he doesn't have none, except for being able to block you. If he does,

575: 501:

Anyway, have a good weekend, be sure to let me know if you ever put it up at

494:

to look in the history and pick out the highest rated version. There is also

930: 544:, which you've taken personally. I'd let it go, really — it's healthier. -- 746:. I mean those links are fine but there are also articles on (for example) 1611:. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under 1521:. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under 1444: 678: 673:

Finding a map with the locations already marked was a pleasant surprise (

21: 2723:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

2615:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

2321:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

743: 739: 268:

Upload the image again, giving all the information you can about it.

646: 2738: 2630: 2522: 2466: 2410: 2354: 2299: 2266: 2233: 2200: 2167: 2107: 2047: 1944: 1841: 1738: 1677: 1587: 1497: 1470: 1451: 1429: 1402: 1299: 1250: 1201: 1156: 1097: 1060: 1010: 980: 947: 924: 886: 775: 765: 725: 710: 699: 681: 667: 657: 639: 625: 597: 582: 555: 534: 509: 477: 436: 416: 403: 322: 310: 258: 197: 127: 36: 166:

at all about the subject: the article needs to explain it to them.

15: 574:

edits as the reason I originally thought there was a call for an

299:

Have you considered looking through PD resources for images? See

2011:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

1908:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

1805:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

862:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

819:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2025:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

1922:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

1819:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

2645: 2537: 2477: 2421: 2365: 2118: 2058: 1955: 1852: 1749: 1647:, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. 1596: 1557:, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. 1506: 1638:

without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template

1548:

without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template

2001:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. 1898:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. 1795:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. 377:

So, to round out this essay ;) here are a couple of tips:

294:

Knowledge (XXG):Image_description_page#Fair_use_rationale

2711:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2693:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

2603:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2585:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

2012: 1909: 1806: 1661: 1571: 786: 2676:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2568:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2150:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

2090:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

1415:

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

1346:

personified them. So, I believe these terms fit the

1226:

I meant that it is you that has to post a message in

901:

for the full details, but change the license tags to

1669:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1615:, but its use in Knowledge (XXG) articles fails our 1579:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1525:, but its use in Knowledge (XXG) articles fails our 1333:I similary am concerned about your revision of the 412:Thanks a lot - it's a pleasure to meet you too. :) 157:I believe that there is support for my view in the 2509:will be deleted after seven days, as described in 2453:will be deleted after seven days, as described in 2397:will be deleted after seven days, as described in 1725:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 329:(and also because it strives for multilinguality). 2313:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 568:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/In the red 159:Knowledge (XXG):Guide to writing better articles 1177:Not to disappoint you, but I agree with Mel at 881:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 2511:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 2505:Note that any non-free images not used in any 2472:Orphaned non-free image File:UngInThailand.jpg 2455:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 2449:Note that any non-free images not used in any 2416:Orphaned non-free image File:UngInCambodia.jpg 2399:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 2393:Note that any non-free images not used in any 2146:Note that any non-free images not used in any 2086:Note that any non-free images not used in any 365:surely there must be some way to automate this 1421:Knowledge (XXG):Images and media for deletion 301:Knowledge (XXG):Public domain image resources 8: 1447:, it also suffers from citation problems. -- 781:Oh, Roger, I did respond, didn't you see it? 142:otherwise very unlikely ever to encounter. 1683:Orphaned non-free media (File:ADAVIS2.jpg) 1485:, but still needs more work. Thanks again. 990:has progressed. I'll see how things go... 496:Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team 276:so, 1925, we are out of luck. Tag it with 91:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 2113:Orphaned non-free image File:DavisLER.jpg 2053:Orphaned non-free image File:LHHdavis.jpg 1950:Orphaned non-free image File:LHHdavis.jpg 1744:Orphaned non-free image File:DavisLER.jpg 1655:, or by taking a picture of it yourself. 1565:, or by taking a picture of it yourself. 883:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 840:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 647:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Syosset 349:OK, as for the "Presumed Free images" at 2360:Orphaned non-free image File:Sem Ung.jpg 1847:Orphaned non-free image File:ADAVIS1.jpg 1136:P.S: No, I don't want to say my name :P 2682:notice, but please explain why in your 2574:notice, but please explain why in your 1503:Replaceable fair use Image:LOUNG21A.jpg 101:Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question 2018:To opt out of these bot messages, add 1915:To opt out of these bot messages, add 1812:To opt out of these bot messages, add 1593:Replaceable fair use Image:Loung10.jpg 2276:A file that you uploaded or altered, 2272:File:UNG-CAM9.jpg listed for deletion 2243:A file that you uploaded or altered, 2239:File:Ung-Cam2.jpg listed for deletion 2210:A file that you uploaded or altered, 2206:File:Ung-Cam2.jpg listed for deletion 2177:A file that you uploaded or altered, 2173:File:UNG-CAM1.jpg listed for deletion 1411:Image:Ace88a3.jpg listed for deletion 799:License tagging for Image:Ace88a3.jpg 7: 2727:of each individual file for details. 2619:of each individual file for details. 872:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 829:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 115:03:03, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC) I Love It. 1381:the blurb in your response, citing 103:, ask me on my talk page, or place 61:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 2671:deleted for any of several reasons 2661:because of the following concern: 2563:deleted for any of several reasons 2553:because of the following concern: 2282:Knowledge (XXG):Files for deletion 2249:Knowledge (XXG):Files for deletion 2216:Knowledge (XXG):Files for deletion 2183:Knowledge (XXG):Files for deletion 1976:. However, the image is currently 1873:. However, the image is currently 1770:. However, the image is currently 1119:and try to restart the discussion. 24:for your tireless efforts, on the 14: 2696:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 2679:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 2588:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 2571:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 2339:review the candidates' statements 1374:01:04, 29 and 30 June 2006 (UTC) 578:article. Feel free to join in. -- 1687: 1632:di-replaceable fair use disputed 1542:di-replaceable fair use disputed 1322:Hi Roger! Vap0rtranz here, from 867:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy 824:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy 2665:unused, low-res, no obvious use 2557:unused, low-res, no obvious use 877:This is an automated notice by 834:This is an automated notice by 787:Click here and you'll see it... 469:(PS. Are you working towards a 2655:File:Loung at Temple Ruins.jpg 2641:File:Loung at Temple Ruins.jpg 2345:. For the Election committee, 2315:Arbitration Committee election 2306:ArbCom elections are now open! 2267:21:39, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 2234:21:39, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 2201:21:39, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 1671:Media copyright questions page 1581:Media copyright questions page 570:, I've just cited one of your 128:19:33, 16 September 2005 (UTC) 37:18:55, 16 September 2005 (UTC) 1: 2500:our policy for non-free media 2444:our policy for non-free media 2388:our policy for non-free media 2355:13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2300:20:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 2141:our policy for non-free media 2081:our policy for non-free media 2015:to file an un-delete request. 1986:our policy for non-free media 1912:to file an un-delete request. 1883:our policy for non-free media 1809:to file an un-delete request. 1780:our policy for non-free media 1712:our policy for non-free media 954:Your MedCab case at Loung Ung 626:00:05, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 598:04:04, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 198:02:54, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 2152:criteria for speedy deletion 2092:criteria for speedy deletion 1727:criteria for speedy deletion 1367:article already discusses). 1075:Image:Wikiscreenshot_ung.jpg 986:Oh, I see the discussion at 682:15:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 583:05:41, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 556:11:24, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 535:05:05, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 510:04:13, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 491:m:Article validation feature 478:06:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC) 437:06:27, 13 January 2006 (UTC) 303:. You never know your luck! 81:How to write a great article 2715:allows discussion to reach 2607:allows discussion to reach 2341:and submit your choices on 2007:If you receive this notice 1904:If you receive this notice 1801:If you receive this notice 1702:. However, it is currently 1678:15:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1588:15:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1394:I had to return my copy of 842:. 05:04, 18 May 2006 (UTC) 780: 417:10:14, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 404:14:01, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 311:03:43, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 289:{{Fairusein|Adelle Davis}} 259:18:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 2754: 2739:01:02, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 2707:exist. In particular, the 2631:01:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 2599:exist. In particular, the 2523:21:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC) 2467:21:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC) 2411:20:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC) 2347:MediaWiki message delivery 1626:the image description page 1536:the image description page 1452:13:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1430:07:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 1358:approval". I looked over 1352:defined within the article 726:01:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 2701:proposed deletion process 2593:proposed deletion process 2478: 2422: 2366: 2119: 2059: 1739:05:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 1645:the image discussion page 1555:the image discussion page 1403:01:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC) 1300:11:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 1251:16:13, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 1202:19:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 711:06:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 700:07:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC) 668:12:50, 8 April 2006 (UTC) 658:02:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 640:18:59, 2 March 2006 (UTC) 542:greengrocers' apostrophes 486:Hey now, take it easy ;). 20:RogerK, I award you this 2168:02:54, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 2108:02:51, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 2048:06:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC) 1945:06:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC) 1842:06:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC) 1617:first fair use criterion 1527:first fair use criterion 1498:18:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 1471:14:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 1157:13:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 1098:12:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1061:12:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1011:13:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC) 981:20:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC) 948:10:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 925:01:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC) 899:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use 887:17:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC) 794:14:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 776:05:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 399:Yours in the WP spirit, 270:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use 150:Language Reference Desk 2029:and leave a message on 1926:and leave a message on 1823:and leave a message on 766:05:33, 7 May 2006 (UTC) 2667: 2650: 2559: 2542: 2491:File:UngInThailand.jpg 2483: 2435:File:UngInCambodia.jpg 2427: 2371: 2124: 2064: 1961: 1858: 1755: 1602: 1512: 813:image description page 39: 2663: 2659:proposed for deletion 2649: 2555: 2551:proposed for deletion 2541: 2488:Thanks for uploading 2481: 2432:Thanks for uploading 2425: 2376:Thanks for uploading 2369: 2319:Arbitration Committee 2280:, has been listed at 2247:, has been listed at 2214:, has been listed at 2181:, has been listed at 2129:Thanks for uploading 2122: 2069:Thanks for uploading 2062: 2020:{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} 1966:Thanks for uploading 1959: 1917:{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} 1863:Thanks for uploading 1856: 1814:{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} 1760:Thanks for uploading 1753: 1692:Thanks for uploading 1605:Thanks for uploading 1600: 1515:Thanks for uploading 1510: 1419:, has been listed at 853:Thanks for uploading 803:Thanks for uploading 384:site:en.wikipedia.org 316:Roger, let me say, I 19: 2713:files for discussion 2688:the file's talk page 2605:files for discussion 2580:the file's talk page 2031:my owner's talk page 1928:my owner's talk page 1825:my owner's talk page 1601:Replaceable fair use 1511:Replaceable fair use 1360:Crisis of Conscience 1230:so we can continue. 1228:User talk:Mel Etitis 905:Non-free fair use in 447:Non-free fair use in 281:Non-free fair use in 2323:arbitration process 1982:You may add it back 1879:You may add it back 1776:You may add it back 1708:You may add it back 1628:and edit it to add 1538:and edit it to add 1179:The Lady of Shalott 789:. :) Take care, -- 327:m:instruction creep 52:Hello, RogerK, and 2705:deletion processes 2651: 2597:deletion processes 2543: 2484: 2428: 2372: 2335:arbitration policy 2125: 2065: 2022:to your talk page. 1962: 1919:to your talk page. 1859: 1816:to your talk page. 1756: 1603: 1518:Image:LOUNG21A.jpg 1513: 960:actual mediation. 856:Image:LOUNG21A.jpg 848:Image:LOUNG21A.jpg 846:Image Tagging for 675:Image:UNG-CAM4.jpg 665:David P. A. Hunter 133:Dogpatch USA edits 66:How to edit a page 40: 2637:Proposed deletion 2547:File:LOUNG003.jpg 2533:File:LOUNG003.jpg 2529:Proposed deletion 2496:claim of fair use 2440:claim of fair use 2384:claim of fair use 2284:. Please see the 2278:File:UNG-CAM9.jpg 2251:. Please see the 2245:File:Ung-Cam2.jpg 2218:. Please see the 2212:File:Ung-Cam2.jpg 2185:. Please see the 2179:File:UNG-CAM1.jpg 2137:claim of fair use 2132:File:DavisLER.jpg 2077:claim of fair use 2072:File:LHHdavis.jpg 1974:claim of fair use 1969:File:LHHdavis.jpg 1871:claim of fair use 1768:claim of fair use 1763:File:DavisLER.jpg 1700:claim of fair use 1608:Image:Loung10.jpg 1483:Brooks-Baxter War 1438:Dogpatch/Monte Ne 1417:Image:Ace88a3.jpg 1383:Christian Freedom 923: 805:Image:Ace88a3.jpg 764: 624: 612:Casablanca (film) 32:, I thank you. -- 2745: 2728: 2698: 2697: 2681: 2680: 2648: 2620: 2590: 2589: 2573: 2572: 2540: 2486: 2480: 2430: 2424: 2379:File:Sem Ung.jpg 2374: 2368: 2164: 2158: 2127: 2121: 2104: 2098: 2067: 2061: 2021: 1964: 1918: 1866:File:ADAVIS1.jpg 1861: 1815: 1758: 1719:my contributions 1695:File:ADAVIS2.jpg 1691: 1664: 1635: 1574: 1545: 1296: 1291: 1284: 1247: 1242: 1235: 1198: 1193: 1186: 1153: 1148: 1141: 1094: 1089: 1082: 1057: 1052: 1045: 1040:is your friend. 1007: 1002: 995: 977: 972: 965: 944: 917: 912: 758: 618: 552: 471:featured article 461: 455: 451: 445: 385: 285: 279: 106: 2753: 2752: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2722: 2709:speedy deletion 2695: 2694: 2678: 2677: 2646: 2644: 2614: 2601:speedy deletion 2587: 2586: 2570: 2569: 2538: 2536: 2513:. Thank you. -- 2475: 2474: 2457:. Thank you. -- 2419: 2418: 2401:. Thank you. -- 2363: 2362: 2343:the voting page 2309: 2274: 2241: 2208: 2175: 2162: 2156: 2116: 2115: 2102: 2096: 2056: 2055: 2019: 1953: 1952: 1916: 1850: 1849: 1813: 1747: 1746: 1685: 1667:Fair Use policy 1660: 1629: 1595: 1577:Fair Use policy 1570: 1539: 1505: 1440: 1413: 1320: 1294: 1287: 1282: 1245: 1238: 1233: 1196: 1189: 1184: 1151: 1144: 1139: 1092: 1085: 1080: 1055: 1048: 1043: 1005: 998: 993: 975: 968: 963: 957: 942: 934: 902: 894: 851: 811:applied to the 801: 783: 735: 719: 717:Dogpatch Quotes 692: 633: 607: 590: 564: 550: 523: 459: 453: 449: 443: 430: 383: 290: 283: 277: 266: 264:Fair use images 135: 121: 104: 86:Manual of Style 45: 30:Knowledge (XXG) 12: 11: 5: 2751: 2749: 2719:for deletion. 2699:will stop the 2643: 2634: 2611:for deletion. 2591:will stop the 2535: 2526: 2473: 2470: 2417: 2414: 2361: 2358: 2312: 2308: 2303: 2273: 2270: 2240: 2237: 2207: 2204: 2174: 2171: 2114: 2111: 2054: 2051: 2037: 2035: 2034: 2023: 2016: 2005: 2002: 1951: 1948: 1934: 1932: 1931: 1920: 1913: 1902: 1899: 1848: 1845: 1831: 1829: 1828: 1817: 1810: 1799: 1796: 1745: 1742: 1684: 1681: 1673:. Thank you. — 1649: 1648: 1641: 1594: 1591: 1583:. Thank you. — 1559: 1558: 1551: 1504: 1501: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1412: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1319: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1117:Talk:Loung Ung 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1024:Talk:Loung Ung 1014: 1013: 988:Talk:Loung Ung 956: 951: 933: 928: 893: 890: 875: 874: 869: 850: 844: 832: 831: 826: 800: 797: 782: 779: 773:WilliamThweatt 748:Food additives 734: 729: 718: 715: 714: 713: 691: 687:Response from 685: 671: 670: 650: 649: 632: 629: 606: 601: 589: 586: 563: 560: 559: 558: 522: 519: 517: 515: 514: 513: 512: 499: 487: 481: 480: 467: 429: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 407: 406: 396: 395: 391: 390: 387: 379: 378: 374: 373: 369: 368: 355: 354: 346: 345: 340: 339: 331: 330: 288: 265: 262: 248: 247: 246: 245: 239: 238: 234: 233: 232: 231: 224: 223: 218: 217: 216: 215: 209: 208: 180: 179: 168: 167: 134: 131: 120: 117: 97:sign your name 89: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 63: 44: 41: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2750: 2741: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2726: 2720: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2691: 2689: 2685: 2674: 2672: 2666: 2662: 2660: 2656: 2642: 2638: 2635: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2618: 2612: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2583: 2581: 2577: 2566: 2564: 2558: 2554: 2552: 2548: 2534: 2530: 2527: 2525: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2503: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2492: 2485: 2471: 2469: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2447: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2436: 2429: 2415: 2413: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2391: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2380: 2373: 2359: 2357: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2307: 2304: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2288: 2283: 2279: 2271: 2269: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2255: 2250: 2246: 2238: 2236: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2222: 2217: 2213: 2205: 2203: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2189: 2184: 2180: 2172: 2170: 2169: 2165: 2159: 2154:. Thank you. 2153: 2149: 2144: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2133: 2126: 2112: 2110: 2109: 2105: 2099: 2094:. Thank you. 2093: 2089: 2084: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2073: 2066: 2052: 2050: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2017: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2003: 2000: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1963: 1958: 1949: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1914: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1900: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1860: 1855: 1846: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1811: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1797: 1794: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1783: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1764: 1757: 1752: 1743: 1741: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1729:. Thank you. 1728: 1724: 1720: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1690: 1682: 1680: 1679: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1663: 1656: 1654: 1646: 1642: 1639: 1633: 1627: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1599: 1592: 1590: 1589: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1573: 1566: 1564: 1556: 1552: 1549: 1543: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1509: 1502: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1484: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1469: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1450: 1446: 1437: 1435: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1427: 1422: 1418: 1410: 1404: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1373: 1368: 1366: 1361: 1355: 1353: 1349: 1343: 1341: 1336: 1331: 1327: 1325: 1324:Raymond Franz 1317: 1301: 1298: 1297: 1292: 1290: 1285: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1252: 1249: 1248: 1243: 1241: 1236: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1194: 1192: 1187: 1180: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1158: 1155: 1154: 1149: 1147: 1142: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1118: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1099: 1096: 1095: 1090: 1088: 1083: 1076: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1053: 1051: 1046: 1039: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1003: 1001: 996: 989: 985: 984: 983: 982: 979: 978: 973: 971: 966: 955: 952: 950: 949: 945: 939: 932: 929: 927: 926: 921: 916: 910: 906: 900: 891: 889: 888: 884: 880: 873: 870: 868: 865: 864: 863: 860: 858: 857: 849: 845: 843: 841: 837: 830: 827: 825: 822: 821: 820: 817: 814: 810: 806: 798: 796: 795: 792: 791:Easter Monkey 788: 778: 777: 774: 768: 767: 762: 757: 753: 752:food industry 749: 745: 741: 733: 730: 728: 727: 724: 716: 712: 709: 708:Easter Monkey 704: 703: 702: 701: 698: 697:Easter Monkey 690: 689:Easter Monkey 686: 684: 683: 680: 676: 669: 666: 662: 661: 660: 659: 656: 648: 644: 643: 642: 641: 638: 630: 628: 627: 622: 617: 613: 605: 602: 600: 599: 596: 587: 585: 584: 581: 577: 573: 569: 562:(passes buck) 561: 557: 553: 547: 543: 539: 538: 537: 536: 533: 529: 520: 518: 511: 508: 504: 500: 497: 492: 488: 485: 484: 483: 482: 479: 476: 472: 468: 465: 458: 448: 441: 440: 439: 438: 435: 427: 424: 418: 415: 411: 410: 409: 408: 405: 402: 398: 397: 393: 392: 388: 381: 380: 376: 375: 371: 370: 366: 362: 357: 356: 352: 348: 347: 344:impenetrable. 342: 341: 337: 333: 332: 328: 324: 319: 315: 314: 313: 312: 309: 304: 302: 297: 295: 287: 286:, like this: 282: 275: 271: 263: 261: 260: 257: 253: 243: 242: 241: 240: 236: 235: 228: 227: 226: 225: 220: 219: 213: 212: 211: 210: 206: 205: 204: 200: 199: 196: 192: 187: 183: 177: 176: 175: 173: 164: 163: 162: 160: 155: 153: 147: 143: 140: 132: 130: 129: 126: 118: 116: 114: 110: 102: 98: 94: 87: 84: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 62: 59: 58: 57: 55: 50: 49: 42: 38: 35: 31: 27: 23: 18: 2725:page history 2721: 2703:, but other 2692: 2684:edit summary 2675: 2668: 2664: 2652: 2617:page history 2613: 2595:, but other 2584: 2576:edit summary 2567: 2560: 2556: 2544: 2506: 2504: 2489: 2487: 2476: 2450: 2448: 2433: 2431: 2420: 2394: 2392: 2377: 2375: 2364: 2310: 2292:Calliopejen1 2286: 2275: 2259:Calliopejen1 2253: 2242: 2226:Calliopejen1 2220: 2209: 2193:Calliopejen1 2187: 2176: 2147: 2145: 2130: 2128: 2117: 2087: 2085: 2070: 2068: 2057: 2038:Thank you. 2036: 2008: 1992:PLEASE NOTE: 1991: 1990: 1967: 1965: 1954: 1935:Thank you. 1933: 1905: 1889:PLEASE NOTE: 1888: 1887: 1864: 1862: 1851: 1832:Thank you. 1830: 1802: 1786:PLEASE NOTE: 1785: 1784: 1761: 1759: 1748: 1722: 1716: 1693: 1686: 1657: 1650: 1637: 1606: 1604: 1567: 1560: 1547: 1516: 1514: 1492: 1465: 1441: 1433: 1424: 1414: 1395: 1382: 1369: 1365:Nathan Knorr 1359: 1356: 1351: 1344: 1339: 1334: 1332: 1328: 1321: 1318:JW and Franz 1288: 1280: 1239: 1231: 1190: 1182: 1145: 1137: 1086: 1078: 1049: 1041: 1019: 999: 991: 969: 961: 958: 935: 915:pfctdayelise 909:article name 908: 895: 876: 861: 854: 852: 833: 818: 802: 784: 769: 756:pfctdayelise 736: 732:Adelle Davis 720: 693: 672: 651: 634: 616:pfctdayelise 608: 604:12 Angry Men 595:pfctdayelise 591: 572:Dogpatch USA 565: 528:greengrocers 524: 516: 507:pfctdayelise 475:pfctdayelise 463: 434:pfctdayelise 431: 426:Adelle Davis 414:pfctdayelise 401:pfctdayelise 364: 360: 317: 308:pfctdayelise 305: 298: 291: 273: 267: 249: 222:terminology. 201: 188: 184: 181: 169: 156: 148: 144: 139:Dogpatch USA 136: 122: 90: 51: 47: 46: 26:Dogpatch USA 1073:Roger, see 1020:Arbitration 252:Ground Zero 191:Ground Zero 2731:FastilyBot 2623:FastilyBot 2331:topic bans 2287:discussion 2254:discussion 2221:discussion 2188:discussion 2157:Skier Dude 2097:Skier Dude 1495:The_stuart 1468:The_stuart 1449:The_stuart 1348:JW Project 943:Μελ Ετητης 938:Mel Etitis 920:translate? 761:translate? 723:The_stuart 621:translate? 576:in the red 551:Μελ Ετητης 546:Mel Etitis 521:Apologies? 125:The_stuart 105:{{helpme}} 93:Wikipedian 71:Help pages 34:The_stuart 2717:consensus 2657:has been 2653:The file 2609:consensus 2549:has been 2545:The file 2327:site bans 1662:this link 1572:this link 931:Loung Ung 879:OrphanBot 836:OrphanBot 809:image tag 631:Loung Ung 588:Userboxes 457:bookcover 292:Then see 95:! Please 2729:Thanks, 2621:Thanks, 2507:articles 2451:articles 2395:articles 2148:articles 2088:articles 1978:orphaned 1875:orphaned 1772:orphaned 1723:articles 1704:orphaned 1613:fair use 1523:fair use 1445:Monte Ne 1340:religion 361:manually 323:commons: 306:cheers, 109:Longhair 76:Tutorial 48:Welcome! 22:barnstar 2040:DASHBot 1997:I am a 1937:DASHBot 1894:I am a 1834:DASHBot 1791:I am a 1038:WP:RfAr 655:Syosset 637:Syosset 318:totally 54:welcome 43:Welcome 2686:or on 2578:or on 2317:. The 1624:Go to 1534:Go to 1426:Selket 1400:Justin 1396:Crisis 1372:Justin 892:Images 744:author 740:health 580:Paul A 532:RogerK 503:WP:FAC 464:at all 428:images 351:WP:ICT 119:Thanks 2515:B-bot 2459:B-bot 2403:B-bot 2009:after 1906:after 1803:after 1731:BJBot 1335:Intro 336:WP:HD 272:says 230:term. 2735:talk 2627:talk 2519:talk 2463:talk 2407:talk 2351:talk 2296:talk 2263:talk 2230:talk 2197:talk 2163:talk 2103:talk 2044:talk 2027:here 2013:here 1941:talk 1924:here 1910:here 1838:talk 1821:here 1807:here 1735:talk 1675:Angr 1585:Angr 1295:tofs 1246:tofs 1197:tofs 1152:tofs 1093:tofs 1056:tofs 1006:tofs 976:tofs 750:and 172:here 170:And 152:here 113:Talk 2639:of 2531:of 2502:). 2446:). 2390:). 2311:Hi, 2143:). 2083:). 1999:bot 1988:). 1896:bot 1885:). 1793:bot 1782:). 1714:). 1643:On 1553:On 679:Jay 566:At 489:An 473:?) 2737:) 2690:. 2673:. 2629:) 2582:. 2565:. 2521:) 2465:) 2409:) 2353:) 2329:, 2298:) 2265:) 2232:) 2199:) 2166:) 2106:) 2046:) 1943:) 1840:) 1737:) 1636:, 1634:}} 1630:{{ 1546:, 1544:}} 1540:{{ 1493:-- 1466:-- 1342:. 946:) 913:. 911:}} 903:{{ 885:. 742:, 695:-- 554:) 505:! 460:}} 454:{{ 450:}} 444:{{ 284:}} 278:{{ 254:| 193:| 174:: 161:: 111:| 2733:( 2625:( 2517:( 2482:⚠ 2461:( 2426:⚠ 2405:( 2370:⚠ 2349:( 2294:( 2261:( 2228:( 2195:( 2160:( 2123:⚠ 2100:( 2063:⚠ 2042:( 2033:. 1960:⚠ 1939:( 1930:. 1857:⚠ 1836:( 1827:. 1754:⚠ 1733:( 1640:. 1550:. 1289:e 1283:f 1240:e 1234:f 1191:e 1185:f 1146:e 1140:f 1087:e 1081:f 1050:e 1044:f 1000:e 994:f 970:e 964:f 940:( 922:) 918:( 907:| 763:) 759:( 623:) 619:( 548:( 256:t 195:t

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index