User talk:Rossnixon - Knowledge (XXG)

442:]. You had put the language which fails to treat this from a neutral voice (e.g. talking from within the religion rather than as a neutral party). The article is about more than just the ark, it's about the story surrounding the ark (which you've put it back to). You also removed the quote with the geological viewpoint (referenced), the mention of sacrifice, the period of the deluge, put back the amateurish sentence structure and also re-inserted the spelling mistake "reappeares". I'm sorry if I've treated your edit as unhelpful: but if you've got something more to add perhaps we can discuss how best to incorporate that into it. But drive-by reverting with an obvious ignorance of the fixes isn't real helpful. Thanks, 2489:

the article better, on a small scale obviously. Do you find any difficulty approaching religious topics dispassionately; that is, would you edit out parts of an article that were examples of obvious evangelism or articles slanted toward the creationist viewpoint? As a source of information, we all obviously must do our best to try to be neutral - and to know in which cases we cannot. I too know that it is impossible for any of us to check all our opinions at the door, which is why I am asking you about this. I look forward to a cogent, productive, and polite conversation on this topic. Thanks again for your time!

3939: 687:, disambiguation pages are intended to help readers to navigate through Knowledge (XXG) articles, which was the main reason I made the change. It was an additional benefit that some of the stuff removed was unreferenced nonsense (the "ghosting sexual position" crap, Halloween pranks etc). I know the Hamish & Andy part wasn't nonsense, but it was tagged as unreferenced since June, and belongs in their main article anyway. As an aside, I'm looking forward to Hamish & Andy's 649:. I said that the Genesis chronology (A begat B in his nth year, and B begat C in his nth year, and so on) places the flood 1600 (approx) years after Creation, which I believe is pretty correct. But then I say that Creationists, taking the biblical chronology as their basis, date Creation to the 3rd millenium. But this may not be correct, as I gather that many date it to about 10,000 BC. Why do they do that, and what's the range of opinion in creationist circles? Thanks 3766:"bi-roshiit". Made up of a preposition, "bi" (or "be" if you like", meaning, "in" or "at", and a second word the root of which is the consonants r-sh, meaning "head". No definite article. Therefore it means "at (or in) head." The full phrase can be transliterated "At head making (or forming, or creating) Elohim the heavens and the earth". (Note that there are definite articles for "heavens" and "earth", and that "heavens" is plural). 2509: 2911: 2214: 2602: 2408: 866: 3868: 21: 3456: 1577: 1603: 182: 1670: 1457: 1132:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 1049:. It concerns a table comparing the accounts of Matthew and Luke. There are concerns over the use of primary sources, OR, novel synthesis, lack of explanation/context which would be afforded by prose, and even its necessity, given the section "The nativity as myth". The table can be seen at this version of the page: 1212:

must have been a single author - was trying to build a chain of generations, but why this structure? And for that matter, why is it only visible if you include Chronicles and Ruth - or at least the last parts from Judah on to the Destruction. The bible is full of mysteries, which is what makes it so fascinating.

1023:" of the 19th century. There was no reason to examine whether the view was valid - no one had produced a convincing alternative, and still haven't IMHO. The so-called fundamentalist revival was just a fight to reclaim ground lost to higher criticism once it became obvious that it's claims were largely invalid. 3569:

As I understand it, among many writers who have contened that Jesus did not exist, there are two widely read ones today, Robert Price and Earl Doherty. While relatively few historians believe this, Price remains a respected scholar while for a variety of reasons, Doherty is not. There is a difference

3429:

However, I do challenge the first sentence which asserts that creation science attempts to disprove scientific facts when I have cited the president of the Institute for Creation Research which gives proof that all creation scientists do not disprove facts, therefore the implication they they do is a

2006:

Being a latecomer to the article, I'm unclear exactly who is committed to the article and what they are committed to. I've heard a good deal from those in favor of the "myth" title, but not so much from those opposed. Eactly WHAT would be needed for a consensus title before you would be comfortable

1837:

Hey RossNixon, thanks for deciding to help contribute to the Jesus page! As you can imagine, this page is highly contentious and requires much deliberation. You may not have noticed that the section which you removed material from is actually the topic of an ongoing collaboration. Please feel free

1211:

The pattern of generations is also interesting, though God knows what it means: there are ten generations from Adam to Noah, another ten to Abraham, then a group of 3 (Abraham, Isaac, Jacob), then ten again from Judah to David, and ten from David to the fall of the Temple. Clearly the author - and it

526:

Abortion debate. You mention that the right to life accrues at something like the pro-nucleus stage (?). Your very interesting biology reference, however, (which I read in full) makes no reference whatsoever to right to life or personhood, so I must conclude that such is your opinion. My opinion is

273:

By 'project', do you mean the Knowledge (XXG) page? Or the Discovery Institute's ideas? I stopped looking at the WP page long ago, as I don't really keep up with the subject. I'm more into creationism of the YEC variety. You can't be banned for merely disagreeing with people, if you were following WP

3530:

You will find that Knowledge (XXG) guidelines state that fringe views should rarely be included. In encyclopedias, we give scholarly views. It is like 'Evolution'. You won't find the first section stating that 40% of people don't believe it explains our origins. (P.S. I regret that you felt insulted

2488:

I just now noticed the post above mine on this page about a supposed edit war on a page on creationism. I haven't read any more details, but the NPOV policy is very clear. My own personal views on religion and christianity in particular played no role in my editing - I was motivated purely to make

1262:

The only thing that changed with the "confirmed" numbers between the two sources is that they realised one person hadn't come from the US, so the number decreased from 14 to 13. But the main point is that "confirmed" here doesn't mean confirmed by laboratory tests, which is what goes in that column.

1203:

Note how the text carefully says that YHWH Elohim is the god "of Shem", but omits anything like this for Japheth. This is an ongoing theme in the OT - with each generation, Yahweh becomes more and more closely identified with a narrower and narrower group: first with the descendants of Shem (Japheth

664:

Creation is dated at 4000 to 4100 BC using very conservative/literalist reasoning, but to avoid being quite so dogmatic, we generally say the earth is 6-10 thousand years old (i.e. 4000 to 8000 BC). This allows for nearly any "unknown" factors. Note than this does not pull the flood back to 6400 BC,

3012:

Why would you think that the comment would be any more persuasive the second time around? Why would you think that reverting was better than discussing? If you wish to participate in editing controversial articles, you're going to need to learn to get consensus for your changes instead of trying to

2326:

of all Christians. This is because apostasy means departure (translated so in the first seven English translations)" applies only to the "apostasy" mentioned in 2 Thessalonians 2:3, and none of the other passages. I think you were aware of this but it is not reflected in your comment. Therefore, I

2472:

I felt the change warranted because the word "few" is imprecise and slanted to marginalize a group of people holding the views under discussion there. The word "some" communicates the same information, but without the slant. I'd truly like to hear your argument as to why "few" makes the article

1412:

Hi. I believe the category Critics of NATO bombing of Yugoslavia is a legitimate one. All of the individuals on the list have expressed through written works or public statement their opposition or concerns for the legitimacy of the bombing. So I don't see why it should be deleted. I believe this

3514:

I find your revert and comment about my edits insulting and naive. To dismiss a rather large segment of humanity (in many countries, the majority opinion) as "fringe" and pretend that their views on Jesus are unimportant is both repulsive and intolerant. And as far as the "scholarly" comment, in

1207:

Something else that intrigues me is the pattern of reversals you find in this chain. Usually the eldest son is favoured, but at key points it's often the youngest who is favoured over his brothers. David himself is the most notable example, but there's also Judah (the youngest son of his mother,

967:

Depends on the method used to calculate the best proportions. Do we go by the current beliefs of the english-speaking general public? Or by the current beliefs of English-speaking scholars in that area of expertise? If a belief is widespread but only introduced recently, do we shrink a long-held

1712:

Hi, thanks for your correction of my understanding. Clearly the issue of how to quote such texts is more complex than I appreciate. Perhaps you could explain why the translation you chose differs both from the translation at the cited reference, and the translation of the NIV in the boxed quote

995:

Yes, the answer isn't easy.It's interesting though that the literalist view is comparatively recent - it emerged in the early 20th century. Before that, the literal truth of the Genesis story had been accepted rather than examined. It was only in the early 20th century that a whole intellectual

2120:

I appreciate your enthusiasm for what appears to be a consensus forming around the new title. However, I think it would be wise to wait for the process to conclude and for the actual page move to be completed before jumping the gun on the lead sentence. Further, I think you'll find it's not

472:

about YEC being considered pseudoscience. Your reasoning was perfectly valid, in that scientific concensus has no bearing on pseudoscience. However the statement was also perfectly true, in that going against concencus is the reason that YEC is considered pseudoscience. I.e. because the

2550:

You added "Some modern critical scholars, however claim the 15th century." I would think you are experienced enough to know that the lead summarises the article and this unsourced statement does not do that. This seems to be part of an attempt of yours to add this sort of claim to articles.

784:

Apart from the spelling mistake, I'm wondering about the reference to the seven animals. I sort of recall a long discussion about this on the Noah's Ark article a long time ago, and I sort of remember we came to the conclusion that it actually meant 14 animals - the Hebrew says, literally,

307:

Ross, my objective is only to produce a reference for stating the doctrine is complex due to the editor that stated it was POV. I think the request is absurd; I did a quick search and took the third one that I checked. It stated the doctrine was complex and I did not look at anything else.

157:

I checked it again as you suggested. It said "When an admin or rollbacker sees an unworthy change to an article (usually vandalism)". It was "unworthy" as there was no consensus to change it. It then became vandalism when the editor in question kept reverting without adequate discussion.

3880:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2822:. When someone reverts your contributions and asked you to discuss on the talk page, the appropriate course of action is not to re-revert. You need to go to the talk page and summarize your objections. As I stated very clearly to you above, this behavior will get you reported on 2143:

Hey Ross, I reverted your edit which added Global Warming to List of Hoaxes. As I said in my edit summary, Global Warming is a fact. Some of the evidence used to support GW may have been hoaxed, but Global Warming remains a fact. If you disagree, you would need to delete our

616:

Look, I get your sense of humor. Unfortunately, a lot of admins have none. And again, placing humorous edits does qualify as vandalism, and you're not a vandal. And of course, maybe it's one of the funny things that hits just a bit too close to home. Just a thought.

1237:. However the figures in your edit were wrong; if you read the source cited, you'll see that only four cases have been confirmed through laboratory tests, which is the count that should be given in the first column of the table. I've reverted to the correct figures. -- 2327:

thought that it was more appropriate to place your comments in footnote #37 in line with what is mentioned about 2 Thess. 2:3. This makes more sense since, from my research, this view is not well received from the vast majority of scholars and commentators. Blessings,

3487:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 1075:

FWIW, I found it interesting...Nazirite and Nazarite are actually different words, says the OED. Nazirites are the people such as Samson and John the Baptist, and Nazarites are persons from Nazareth, or Christians. Just thought you might be interested too. Cheers.

1204:

and Ham are ruled out), then of the descendants of Abraham (but the Covenant is exclusively with Abraham's descendants through Isaac and Israel), and then finally with one family, that of David (ruling out the royal dynasties of the northern kingdom of Israel).

1199:

There's no definite article in the Hebrew - it doesn't say "Blessed be the Lord God of Shem", it says "Blessed be YHWH Elohim of Shem", with YHWH as a personal name - it doesn't mean "Lord". So a better translation would be, "Blessed be YHWH (the) God of Shem".

720:

I know! I tend to forget that it's on, which isn't even a good excuse. I expect the disambig page will be expanded again after the Regifted special airs, but we can move whatever's useful to their main article, perhaps just leaving "A game described by

403:? You did not make this clear. Remsburg is published and therefore seems to not fit your definition of WP:OR. Your claim of 'unreliable' is puzzling when sat next to the clearly Christian apologist references and quotes that litter this page. 2566:

You've also been slowly edit warring this information into other entries when you know this is not a view held by scholars. Please stop doing this. At the very least try to get consensus on the talk page before making any edits that might be

1838:

to contribute any ideas you may have, but because you removed cited material that is relevant to the section I am going to revert it. If you really feel that the article will be better without that text then please jump in and explain! Thanks

881:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the

3578:

However, a lack of consideration or acceptance does not necessarily imply rejection, either; ideas should not be portrayed as rejected or labeled with pejoratives such as pseudoscience unless such claims can be documented in reliable sources.

376:

I apologize, not because the edit is wrong, but because I thought about it further and realized that it would need a citation to explain or back-up the "inconsequential" nature of the temperature change. It was a "good faith" "bold edit".

3354: 3750:

article's first paragraph used to say "Hebrew: בְּרֵאשִׁית‎, Bereʾšyt, "In THE beginning")" this was changed to "Hebrew: בְּרֵאשִׁית‎, Bereʾšyt, "In A beginning")" The first version was referenced but the change wasn't, what are your

3601:

Other scholars that have contended Jesus did not exist include George Wells (a professor of German), who was desribed by the more mainstream Graham Stanton as the most thoroughgoing and sophisticated claimant of Jesus' non-existence.

3054:

go against common sense, the rules and consensus. Please stop changing the article without first getting buy-in on the Discussion page. You won't get this buy-in, of course, which may be why you're bordering on edit-warring instead.

2619:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the

2425:

2764:

tends to apply to any statement which involves the word "some". The appropriate question to ask is "who"? Fixing such problems involves either the removal of the "some" statement, or replacing it with a specific person/group and a

565:

It was done as a joke. The un-photoshopped, more realistic image is in widespread use. She has denigrated herself by her actions, a photo is going to make little or no difference. Why is a false image of her acceptable anyway?

799:

Unfortunately, there is no way to know for sure. Bible commentators are evenly divided about whether the Hebrew means ‘seven’ or ‘seven pairs’ of each type of clean animal. www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i2/animals.asp

114: 473:

conclusions of YEC are philosophically unacceptable, the methods are non-specifically dismissed as unscientific. If anti-YECs want to hang the illogic of this conclusion out there for the world to see, I say let them.

2581:

The original statement was also unsourced. My expansion of the date range is affirmed by conservative (but non-fringe) scholars. My edit should stand, although I do agree that a ref/citation would be an improvement.

3908: 976:

was followed for the next 150 years by 80%, the remaining 20% still go with "X". An 8:2 proportion to represent current views would belittle/ignore the literature and cultural impact of the more long-standing view.

785:"seven-seven, man-woman" meaning seven male and seven female (it actually uses the words for "man" and "woman"). I don't want to go to all the trouble of researching it again. Do you happen to know what's correct? 198: 95: 3582:

Ideas that have been rejected, are widely considered to be absurd or pseudoscientific, only of historical interest, or primarily the realm of science fiction, should be documented as such, using reliable sources.

3433:

Also, Creation Science is not the same as scientific creationism - scientific creationism, as with theistic evolution and other models, is a subset of Creation Science, which is in itself a subset of Creationism.

1281:

I see your point. I had assumed the newspaper meant "laboratory confirmed" when it said "confirmed". I think that was a bad choice of word by the newspaper - the virus can *only* be confirmed by laboratory tests.

948:

A further thought: So you trimmed the Islamic section bcse it was too large (and I agree): and what happens when I try to trim the literalist section of Noah's ark because it's too large? All hell breaks loose...

3826:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2473:

more encylopedic and from a more neutral point of view than the word "some" - especially in the case in question. Thanks for taking a little time to consider this; we share the same goals, I'm rather certain!

308:

Regardless, I think the reference is reputable, but would be happier if there was another one. Do you know of one? If so, please use it. If not, it should stay because it is both reputable and verifiable. --

406:

Hopefully you are interested in providing a balanced article and not simply defending Christian beliefs and desires to suppress any information that demonstrates Jesus is a mythological construct? Thanks.

3152:

Ross, you've reverted three times in quick succession, which is edit-warring. But you haven't said a thing on the talk page about why you did this. I'm very disappointed; you know better than to do this..

3008:

to make this very same change and were reverted with a request that you come to Talk and explain your change. Instead, you edit-warred, ignoring the request and simply repeating your earlier edit comment.

1101:

There is a problem on the article. I could not identify the problem in the article, so I requested help on the discussion page. It's clear vandalism. Please do not revert my comments without explanation.

258:

You seem to be a longtime user here, who supports Intelligent Design. What do you make of that project? I've been banned twice for disagreeing with people there, and I'm pretty much fed up with wikipedia.

3483:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3892:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3690:? I'm having a hard time seeing a good faith reason for such a change... and I'm really trying. You should know better than this. If there's a legitimate reason I'm missing, please let me know. — 3204:. Dylan and another editor are trying to push a POV that they say represents the "mainstream", which just so happens to be a pretty liberal POV. I can tell you more about this if you are interested. 917:

Thank you. I am aware of the rule. I trust that you will not revert me again. My version appears to be long-standing, therefore you should seek consensus on the talk page for your suggested change.

3594:. In the first case, Very few physicists believe David Bohm's theories on quantum physics- nonetheless David Bohm remains a highly respected physicist. In the second case, the ideas promoted in 1591:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 192: 1472:

prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for

491:

I fixed up and moved the sentence. And actually the 'pseudoscience' is mentioned already in the Criticism section, so now it is mentioned twice and my previous edit summary was correct.

2975:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge (XXG). 3957:. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them. 1730:

All I have done is substituted the modern english terms 'you' and 'from' for the archaic versions 'thee' and obscure usage of 'of'. It would be pedantic to call that a retranslation.

1602:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

1682: 1647: 3016:

I'm going to leave your erroneous edit in place to give you a chance to justify or revert it. If you don't do the former, I expect that the latter will occur, one way or another.

145:

again, if you haven't already. It's also shameful that you used rollback to get up to your 3RR limit as well. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks for your consideration.-

4014: 1267:

for more. I'm happy to try to explain further if you're still not recognising the distinction after reading that, but it might be best if we carry on the conversation there. --

1208:

although not of his father). The position with Abraham and Shem is unclear, but these four are the four crucial flexion points in the narrative of God's favour towards Israel.

58:

You can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the

4009: 3426:

You are correct, there should be no change in the quote. This is my first time editing content, I didn't realize I was editing the quotation from the original source. Sorry.

1805:

I'm just looking for a good compromise, trying various more neutral sounding versions. If anything it is you that is edit warring. I don't recall you looking for alternatives.

2697:(with or without 4 edits in 24 hours) and could end up getting you in trouble. As a note, there are legitimate concerns with the proposed text, not the least of which is 2529: 1588: 1570: 1125: 2781:

lead to a report at AN3. It's very much advisable that you don't perform any more than ~ 1 revert on an article to avoid getting caught in a war. Anyway, good luck.

1929:

Yes, absolutely! You will find, if you do a little research (Google is your friend), that this is quite a common belief. See answersingenesis.org & creation.com

3605:

It is true that this claim has been made by wholly unreliable historians as well, but in general it should be counted as a small minority view, not a fringe view.

1527:

Greetings Rossnixon, I haven't been active here at WP for quite some time but I do recall that we seem to have common areas of interest. You may be interested in

2243:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 3125:

If this was the edit I think it was, it was introduced without citations and is clearly wrong in places, such as stating that Genesis pronounces a "flat earth".

2525: 3477: 2926:

editor, we need to be careful to uphold the integrity and principles of Knowledge (XXG), even while trying to improve the secular bias on important articles.--

1056:, in the threads "The two narratives compared", "The two narratives compared, part 2", and at "Task List (January 15, 2009)". Your input on the issue would be 3616:. I thought it would help to resolve the tag. (I actually made the change on behalf of a friend who is a convinced Jesus-mythicist, which however I am not.)-- 2150:"Global warming is the increase in the average temperature of Earth's near-surface air and oceans since the mid-20th century and its projected continuation. " 1159:

removed two other editors' comments and Stephan's replies. I'm sure he is aware of your previous edit and did not object when it was removed. Let him decide.

2101:

concerning the contentious Gallup poll issue. I didn't revert your edit but figured it'd be better to work it out on the Talk page than in edit summaries.

2129:

skeptics) who are comfortable with the label of "creation myth". There is mainstream scholarly support for the term, even among some groups of Christians.

2533: 422:

I will take a closer look. I spotted some "leading weasel" phrases. I will check to see if the source authors have qualifications in the relevant fields.

2288:

I have started a mediation page as a last resort effort on the conflict between pro-literal (or YEC) and pro-secular (or evolution) bias in the articles

547: 2358: 2297: 1495:

Please, in regards to the thing you keep editing take it to talk and develop a consensus, repeated edit warring with others about this is not helpful.

1129: 3488: 2354: 2322:

You comments from Thomas Ice that "Some pre-tribulation adherents in Protestantism believe that apostasy can be interpreted as the pre-tribulation

2175:

page. While any scientific claim may be strictly said to be a hypothesis, the age of the earth is among the best supported ones you could name.

1371:, most especially for mass date format changes, which is controversial enough. You managed to raise, among other things, the question of "whether 2130: 3954: 3492: 2979: 2515: 1174:

Oh dear, that was not intended, sorry. Please note however that it is vandalism to remove comments from a user talk page other than your own.

357:, etc). Please stop. At the next occurrence, I will request advice on handling the matter from other administrators by initiating a thread at 1673:

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,

3233:

ARE YOU OPPOSED TO CANVASSING, DYLAN? - then explain your call on the Evolution talk page for "more eyes" for the Creation Science article!

2968: 247: 3922: 3851: 1083: 1067: 1713:

above? If this is covered in relatively understandable guidelines, a link would be fine; I don't want to take up too much of your time. --

1133: 2947: 1604:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (3rd nomination)

3472:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to

2350: 476:

I was very tempted to remove the sentence myself when it was first added, but on further consideration I came to the above conclusion.

188: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 1388: 2361:(which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Queries on the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the 1566: 1292:

In fairness to the Herald, the Ministry of Health has often glossed over the distinction between probable and confirmed cases; e.g.

874: 2964: 2625: 2431: 507:

regarding a statement in the lead of the article. I don't know if you watchlist this article, but your input would be appreciated.

817:

If you wish to display a seasonal greeting, please do so on your user page, but absolutely do not vandalize an article to do so.

1264: 996:

structure to support this view was thought necessary. It's all very interesting as part of the intellectual history of the West.

2919: 2867:

Repeatedly re-reverting content is edit warring, and is very clearly not (by its very nature) uncontroversial. Please read over

2394: 2390: 2362: 2061: 241: 237: 27: 3918: 3847: 3698: 3586:

Ideas that are of borderline or minimal notability may be mentioned in Knowledge (XXG), but should not be given undue weight.

3484: 546:

How Christian of you to replace the image of Helen Clark with something that might be considered to denigrate her. Try reading

3901: 2633: 2439: 899: 2739:

and can't see any problem, but thanks for the advice. Looks like this will have to continue on the talk page of the article.

1654: 2637: 2443: 2259: 1678: 1477: 1469: 1234: 883: 878: 3716: 1783: 361:. You will of course be free to present your perspective there, but it would be best if matters did not reach that point. 82: 76: 70: 1584: 1345:- click on regions or "NZ Total". Don't know how often it is updated, but will be interesting to check every day or two. 2077: 1293: 645:

Ross, I just added a para about flood chronology (meaning when the flood occurred in terms of modern chronology) to the

3838:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2643: 2449: 2263: 2229: 1693:. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. 1465: 889: 3913: 3843: 3720: 3636: 1977: 3590:

It's a bit (IMO) like the difference between David Bohm's theories on quantum physics and those promoted by the film

3031:

I've already discussed your poor behavior, but I don't want to overlook the meat: your date is wrong. Take a look at

1646:

Can't be bothered to find the right template, but be aware the GW (and any number of other articles) are covered by

1311: 3473: 3464: 2293: 2357:. An explanation of why it has not been possible to allow this dispute to proceed to mediation is provided at the 2236: 1685:. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages. 2987: 1650: 842:

Yes, vandalism, and you should know better. You should also be aware that your incivility has also been noted.

2621: 2616: 2607: 2427: 2422: 2413: 1436:

without even noting where it came from, I've put a link with my reply so people can read it where you found it.

894:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a 63: 3328: 3314: 3300: 3286: 3281:

for an example of the POV pushing Dylan is doing. He deletes the sources because he considers them "sectarian".

3266: 3224: 3209: 3183: 3158: 3140: 3115: 3110:

Please consider discussing some of your bolder changes in Talk and gaining consensus, instead of just editing.

3091: 3060: 3040: 3021: 3004:

was highly counterproductive, more for the way it was made than for the content, which is simply an error. You

2366: 1756: 1252:

The first source is older. Look at the newer second source: 13 confirmed, 96 suspected. I will change it back.

1156: 1080: 1064: 366: 3889: 3309:

Rossnixon, as you probably noticed elsewhere, Dylan defines everything that is not atheistic as "apologetic".

2853:

When I do a trivial, uncontroversial edit and provide a clear edit summary... I don't call that an edit war.

1413:

category is similar to that the categories of critics of feminism, American anti-Iraq War activists, ect.. --

3938: 3788: 3756: 3323:

Secular is non-religious, not atheistic. I would have thought by now that you'd be aware of the difference.

2418: 2289: 1919: 1786:

you will be reported for doing so. Please note that spacing edits so that they're not technically violating

555: 263: 1592: 585:

edit would be considered vandalism if it were from an IP editor. You are a much better editor than that.

3570:

between a small minority view and a view that is considered outright silly by the scholarly community. As

3357:

in joining this WikiProject? We are short on editors and it would be nice to have another guy onboard...--

2972: 2960: 2693:, when a change you make is reverted, the next step is to discuss on talk. Re-reverting is a violation of 2244: 1944: 1864: 1815:

The introduction is currently sourced and perfectly neutral, so why would I go and look for alternatives?

1696: 1418: 1392: 1053: 710:

Sure, fair enough. Whaddya mean "you missed some Rove episodes"? How can a true blue Ozzie do that?!? ;-)

462: 3839: 3347: 2629: 2435: 2225: 895: 322:

I think we need a more neutral POV, see my comments on talk:Christianity. OK, I see your answer already.

3520: 3364: 2520:? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage on 1999: 1900: 1820: 1795: 1196:

27God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

1108: 763: 312: 3469: 3423:(previous version is more accurate. I don't see any obvious quote problem; let me know if I missed it) 2675:

No. My edit is not controversial, as such. It merely makes an uncited statement into a true statement.

2228:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a

1690: 1627:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 1473: 1414: 870: 665:

it only pulls back the earlier genealogies. The flood is still thought to have been circa 2300-2500 BC.

142: 1896: 1816: 1791: 759: 3669: 3664:

similarIt has similarities to several " which stated "fix bad English". This was clearly misleading.

3555: 2983: 2556: 2494: 2478: 2274: 2016: 2008: 1632: 1500: 1485: 1441: 1384: 389: 3876: 3815: 3806: 3437: 3405: 3252: 2963:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge (XXG) uses a set of 2269:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

832:

Not vandalism actually, just a two word addition (a temporary 'decoration' as per my edit comment).

3989: 3979: 3965: 3701: 3621: 3613: 3500: 3441: 3409: 3395: 3324: 3310: 3296: 3282: 3262: 3220: 3205: 3179: 3154: 3136: 3111: 3087: 3056: 3036: 3017: 2884: 2835: 2790: 2710: 2657: 2572: 2240: 1843: 1752: 1718: 1077: 1061: 532: 447: 362: 216: 3885: 3835: 3819: 3571: 2761: 2736: 2698: 1343: 684: 438:

Hi there, In the interests of avoiding further reverts, I've put back my changes that you removed

3969: 3950: 3752: 2386: 2332: 2195: 2180: 2106: 1962: 1915: 1433: 1141: 907: 847: 822: 551: 504: 469: 294: 259: 233: 149: 3390:

I think you've finally nailed down a stable intro. Thanks for doing better than I could do ;-)

3168:

You have missed some of my comments perhaps? Some are in 'edit summaries', some are on 'talk'.

3035:, which is a fair summary, well-cited. It shows that the date you suggested is a fringe view. 2890: 2841: 2796: 2716: 2701:. I'd suggest addressing those on the talk page, since they're undoubtedly what will come up. 2663: 2157: 2039: 1046: 618: 586: 412: 3897: 3831: 3823: 2251: 59: 3771:

This is nonsensical in English, but "In A beginning" is even more so. Stick with the source.

3660:

Consider this a formal warning about your recent edit at Genesis creation narrative, " As a

3516: 3359: 3258:

Step 4: Retract your accusation. No apology needed, though one would be graciously accepted.

3255:. You will learn that a neutrally-phrased and untargeted call for editors is not canvassing. 3051: 2931: 2305: 2199: 2194:

Nice to meet a fellow YEC editor. You can debate with me or leave a note on my talk page.--

2098: 2072: 1966: 1613:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1555: 1536: 1327: 1310:

Someone has upped confirmed to 16. Want to change it back to 3 for me? Suspected is now 111

1301: 1272: 1242: 1164: 1103: 1020: 755: 751: 744: 722: 512: 481: 309: 290:

Are you sure that is a book you added to the Sarfati article? No sign of it on Amazon yet.

121: 102: 3949:

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in

3900:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3893: 3834:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3827: 2823: 2690: 2532:

for ideas on where to get started. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the

2255: 1787: 1624: 1614: 1607: 1596: 683:

Hey Rossnixon, just letting you know I reverted back the change to the above page. Per the

358: 3747: 3740: 3665: 3551: 2552: 2543: 2508: 2490: 2474: 2270: 2012: 1628: 1509:

Actually, I took it to the talk page, but no one in a week or so has bothered to comment.

1496: 1481: 1437: 730: 700: 600: 527:

that any such lines you draw have no basis in science and are therefore purely political.

2967:

to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

2915: 2868: 2774: 2766: 2694: 1296:. So virtually all the media reports about NZ get this wrong, or at best do the same. -- 399:

as 'WP:OR and unreliable source'. I assume you were referring to reference and quote of

354: 3984: 3961: 3942: 3796: 3778: 3691: 3680: 3617: 3565:

Entirely different section on Jesus Fringe Views- Fringe vs. Small Minority of Scholars

3532: 3496: 3391: 3375: 3234: 3201: 3169: 3126: 3077: 2877: 2854: 2828: 2783: 2740: 2703: 2676: 2650: 2583: 2568: 2145: 2083: 2050: 1958: 1930: 1876: 1839: 1806: 1767: 1731: 1714: 1674: 1510: 1346: 1313: 1283: 1253: 1219: 1175: 1024: 1001: 978: 954: 938: 918: 833: 801: 790: 711: 666: 654: 607: 567: 528: 492: 443: 423: 378: 346: 336: 323: 275: 211: 159: 3547:

It's polite to look at the talk page before telling me I need to go to the talk page.

3076:

edit to talk, sorry. I thought my edit summaries would have been sufficient. Will do.

2601: 2407: 1583:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

865: 350: 4003: 3791:

has some interesting material that you might like (pertains to giants like Goliath).

3661: 3598:

are universally viewed as junk pseudo-science by the entire community of physicists.

2978:

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on

2770: 2521: 2373: 2353:

concerning Genesis Creation Narrative, to which you were listed as a party, has been

2328: 2176: 2102: 1863:. Never appropriate in articlespace unless as part of a direct written quotation. -- 1617:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

1137: 903: 843: 818: 646: 400: 291: 146: 2910: 1322:

Nil Einne‎ beat me to it. I did update the suspected count - thanks for the tip. --

780:

Noah saves his family and represenatives of all animals in groups of two or seven...

2153: 2035: 1860: 1547: 1052:

at section 1.3, "The narratives compared". Discussion on the issue can be found at

408: 3867: 2213: 1589:

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

1571:

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

1193:

26And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

1019:

I think the literalist view was the only one until the attacks from the European "

1402:

Controversial edits that drastically change the content of an article (like your

1145: 1121: 3455: 2172: 1551: 1532: 1376: 1323: 1297: 1268: 1238: 1160: 508: 477: 181: 118: 99: 2258:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 1576: 3719:? This project section has a lot of potential, but currently lacks direction. 2612: 2456: 726: 696: 550:

which says material (including images) requires a high degree of sensitivity.

20: 3515:

academia, almost all professors outside the field of religion feel that way.

2239:

to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only

805: 794: 767: 451: 3792: 3774: 3032: 1380: 1372: 1215: 997: 950: 934: 811: 786: 650: 1681:. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at 2777:. This may sound harsh, but I'm letting you know because things like this 2632:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

2438:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

2049:

Ummm... I believe I put it under "possible hoaxes", not "proven hoaxes".

1546:

Okay, maybe you are not interested, but could you possibly look over our

677: 3904:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1669: 1460:

Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in

1456: 1060:

appreciated, as very few persons have commented on it. Thank you, Ross.

396: 199:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Abortion-breast cancer hypothesis

3995: 3926: 3855: 3822:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

3800: 3782: 3760: 3734: 3705: 3673: 3650: 3625: 3559: 3536: 3524: 3504: 3445: 3413: 3399: 3379: 3368: 3332: 3318: 3304: 3290: 3270: 3238: 3228: 3213: 3187: 3173: 3162: 3144: 3130: 3119: 3095: 3081: 3064: 3044: 3025: 2991: 2935: 2896: 2858: 2847: 2815: 2802: 2744: 2722: 2680: 2669: 2587: 2576: 2560: 2498: 2482: 2462: 2380: 2336: 2323: 2309: 2278: 2203: 2184: 2161: 2133: 2110: 2097:

Hey Rossnixon, I've started a new section on the Creationism talk page

2087: 2054: 2043: 2020: 1991: 1970: 1949: 1934: 1923: 1914:

You believe in Creationism??? Is it possible? Could you explain why? --

1904: 1880: 1869: 1847: 1824: 1810: 1799: 1771: 1760: 1735: 1722: 1706: 1699: 1658: 1636: 1559: 1540: 1514: 1504: 1489: 1445: 1422: 1383:". I don't know about you, but I don't plan to ADlebrate a darn thing. 1350: 1331: 1317: 1305: 1287: 1276: 1257: 1246: 1223: 1179: 1168: 1110: 1086: 1070: 1028: 982: 958: 942: 922: 911: 851: 837: 826: 734: 715: 704: 670: 658: 632: 611: 571: 559: 536: 516: 496: 485: 427: 416: 382: 370: 327: 314: 297: 279: 267: 220: 163: 151: 126: 107: 3975:

we are offering attendees a $ 200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

3468:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 2875:

get you blocked, so it would benefit you to be familiar with policy.

2871:

as you've been instructed to do in the past. Repeatedly edit warring

1528: 3635:

Are you a YEC or an OEC? Please leave me a message on my talk page.

754:, this is just a courtesy note to let you know a RFC has been filed 3612:

that such a view exists (it is not my view, BTW) in the article on

1976:

I'm a Creationist and I don't even live in the western hemisphere.

3073: 2819: 1461: 138: 3982:

if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics.

2298:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Genesis Creation Narrative

2250:

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

2914:

I advise you (as one who has bitterly tasted my own tendency to

773: 3907:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

1748:

Please refrain from pointless (and wrong) name-calling such as

2923: 2624:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 2503: 2430:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 695:

appearances and this will be a great opportunity to catch up.

113:

The mediator would like another agree to him mediating on the

15: 3968:

uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to

3454: 3178:

Edit comments aren't sufficient, and I saw nothing in Talk.

2212: 1575: 2262:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found 1128:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 606:

I know. It was a bold, if somewhat 'cheeky' edit that one!

3295:

Actually, it's because they're apologetic, not scholarly.

1683:

Knowledge (XXG):General sanctions/Climate change probation

1648:

Knowledge (XXG):General sanctions/Climate change probation

397:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Historicity_of_Jesus#Jesus_as_myth

141:

were not simply reverting vandalism. You may want to read

2536:. We look forward to working with you in the future! ~~~~ 2524:. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the 2082:

05:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC) No. No personal attacks there.

2007:

making improvements to the article? Please let me know

1045:

Ross, would you mind commenting on a content dispute at

3934:

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

3888:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3687: 3548: 3374:

Sorry, probably not. Don't really have the spare time.

3278: 3005: 3001: 2068: 2031: 1892: 1857: 1749: 1368: 1096: 1050: 972:

was believed for 2000 years by 95% of people. New view

582: 439: 343: 137:

Please don't abuse the rollback feature. Your edits to

51: 1887:

Failing to adhere to WP:Words_to_avoid#Myth_and_legend

3430:

logical fallacy (hasty generalization) and is false.

2636:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 2442:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 2235:

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

1790:'s 24-hour rule will unlikely gain you any lenience. 750:

Since you've contributed to the recent discussion at

3451:

Fair use rationale for File:Isobel (Izzy) Cooper.jpg

2315:

Pre-Trib comment in Apostasy in Christianity Article

1751:, especially at articles under probation. Thanks. -- 3491:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 2773:too, and warring over there is covered by the same 1766:It was a harmless 'dig'. Don't be hyper-sensitive. 197:You can find more information on the case subpage, 3200:I invite you to come offer your two cents over on 3814:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2628:to work towards wording and content that gains a 2434:to work towards wording and content that gains a 2071:to raise the level of discourse a bit? Thanks, - 1432:I've deleted some copyvio material you placed on 468:I reverted your deletion of the the statement in 2769:. In any case, I have to point out that I watch 2546:- addition of text in lead not backed by article 1358: 3945:are holding some seats for us until 21 November 3576: 3248:Step 2: Repeat step 1, avoiding SCREAMING CAPS. 1233:Hi, I see you tried to improve the NZ entry in 1190:It's at Genesis 9:26-27, the Blessing of Noah: 691:show this week, because I missed some of their 465:when I reinstated this sentence the last time. 349:violates several Knowledge (XXG) policies (see 1476:, even if they do not technically violate the 2689:It doesn't matter if it's controversial. Per 2296:. Please participate by following this link 548:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons 246:If you have questions about this bot, please 8: 4015:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 4010:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 2148:article, the first sentence of which reads 1359:They don't make a warning template for this 31:. Rossnixon has not edited Knowledge (XXG) 2948:Wikiproject Young Earth Creationism invite 2611:according to the reverts you have made on 2417:according to the reverts you have made on 2220:Hello. Your account has been granted the " 933:Good work on editing the Islamic section. 873:according to the reverts you have made on 725:" as the last entry in the disambig page? 176: 2980:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 2605:You currently appear to be engaged in an 2411:You currently appear to be engaged in an 1186:Yahweh the god of Shem but not of Japheth 968:opposing view way down in size? Example: 869:You currently appear to be engaged in an 3937: 3746:I'm no language or religion expert but 3462:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 2955:License tagging for File:Izzy Cooper.jpg 2468:Historicity of Christ page - few vs some 248:contact the Mediation Committee directly 3050:In the same vein, your recent edits to 1623:This is an automatic notification by a 1408:Adding politically motivated categories 191:to which you were are a party has been 28:This user may have left Knowledge (XXG) 3013:forcefully ram them down our throats. 1235:Template:2009 swine flu outbreak table 457:Scientific Concensus and Pseudoscience 2982:. Thank you for your cooperation. -- 7: 3877:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 3608:It seems to be OK to simply mention 1367:use "search and replace" as you did 898:among editors. If necessary, pursue 342:Your persistent low-level disruption 3890:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2062:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks 3861:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 3072:I missed your request to take the 2034:here. It's still a controversy. -- 1468:from editing Knowledge (XXG). The 390:Historicity of Jesus#Jesus as myth 14: 3960:Golden Bay is hard to get to and 3840:review the candidates' statements 2814:You're currently edit warring on 2640:. If the edit warring continues, 2446:. If the edit warring continues, 2260:Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing process 2232:scheduled to end 15 August 2010. 1451:Edit Warring - September 29, 2009 875:Internal consistency of the Bible 395:You quickly dismissed my edit to 3874:Hello, Rossnixon. Voting in the 3866: 2909: 2600: 2507: 2406: 1668: 1455: 864: 577: 180: 19: 3911:and submit your choices on the 3656:Misleading edit summary warning 3245:Step 1: Calm down and be civil. 1782:If you continue to edit war on 461:This is exactly what I said to 3846:. For the Election committee, 3816:Arbitration Committee election 3807:ArbCom elections are now open! 3493:Media copyright questions page 2992:11:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 2826:, which will lead to a block. 2345:Request for mediation rejected 1490:21:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 1398:Re your edit to Global Warming 633:02:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 612:01:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 601:01:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 572:02:43, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 560:03:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 537:21:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 517:02:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 173:Request for mediation accepted 1: 3996:09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC) 3927:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 3856:08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 3801:09:54, 15 November 2011 (UTC) 3706:05:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 3531:- there was no such intent.) 3465:File:Isobel (Izzy) Cooper.jpg 3446:03:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 3414:03:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 2626:discuss controversial changes 2432:discuss controversial changes 2372:For the Mediation Committee, 2224:" userright, allowing you to 2055:01:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC) 2044:03:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2021:12:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 1950:03:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 1935:01:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 1924:18:42, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 1784:creation according to genesis 1087:20:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 1071:20:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 827:03:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC) 806:01:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 795:07:59, 17 December 2008 (UTC) 768:22:38, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 735:11:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 716:01:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 705:10:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 578:I know you're a better editor 298:03:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 3783:05:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC) 3761:13:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 3537:01:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC) 3525:12:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 3505:01:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 3489:criteria for speedy deletion 3400:14:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 3380:01:52, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 3369:06:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3333:04:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3319:04:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3305:04:13, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3291:04:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3271:01:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 3239:01:48, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 3229:04:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3214:04:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3188:02:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3174:02:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3163:02:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3145:02:15, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3131:02:15, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3120:02:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 3096:06:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 3082:01:59, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 3065:12:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 3045:04:26, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 3026:04:18, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 2514:Have you considered joining 2397:to perform case management.) 2301: 2171:I reverted your edit on the 1905:22:45, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1881:01:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 1870:05:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1848:02:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1825:02:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1811:01:40, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1800:09:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 1772:01:27, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 1761:07:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 1736:01:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 1723:01:38, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 1700:22:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1659:08:29, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1637:01:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC) 1560:13:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC) 1550:and make a few suggestions? 1515:01:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 1342:There is a nice NZ map here 1126:featured article review here 1029:01:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 983:01:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 959:11:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 943:09:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 923:02:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 912:02:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 671:01:15, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 659:07:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 542:Very christian of you -- NOT 280:05:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 268:08:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 221:15:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 208:For the Mediation Committee, 164:08:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 152:03:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 127:23:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 108:03:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 3842:and submit your choices on 3735:11:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC) 3674:04:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 2936:10:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC) 2897:02:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 2859:02:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 2848:03:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 2803:03:09, 12 August 2010 (UTC) 2745:02:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC) 2723:02:45, 12 August 2010 (UTC) 2681:02:35, 12 August 2010 (UTC) 2670:02:30, 12 August 2010 (UTC) 2454:without further notice. — 2389:, an automated bot account 2385:(This message delivered by 2067:Would you mind refactoring 1597:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1587:. The nominated article is 1541:03:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 1505:08:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC) 1446:17:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 1423:17:54, 15 August 2009 (UTC) 852:02:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 838:01:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 497:11:12, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 486:02:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 452:06:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 303:references on being complex 244:to perform case management. 236:, an automated bot account 4031: 3919:MediaWiki message delivery 3848:MediaWiki message delivery 3626:21:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC) 3596:What the Bleep Do we Know? 3592:What the Bleep Do we Know? 3560:11:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC) 3277:Rossnixon, take a look at 2588:02:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 2577:02:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 2561:04:52, 4 August 2010 (UTC) 2294:Genesis creation narrative 2241:a small number of articles 2134:03:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC) 1593:Knowledge (XXG):Notability 1375:ought to be ADlebrated on 1332:12:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 1318:08:56, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 1306:03:03, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 1288:01:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 1277:00:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 1258:23:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 1247:21:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 1224:08:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1180:01:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1169:02:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 1146:15:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1111:02:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 428:02:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 417:17:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 383:01:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 371:01:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 328:01:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 315:01:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 254:Just stumbled on your page 232:This message delivered by 3686:Could you please explain 3476:and edit it to include a 3474:the file description page 2648:without further notice. 2517:WikiProject Cryptozoology 2499:03:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC) 2483:03:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC) 2463:03:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC) 2381:22:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC) 2337:13:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC) 2310:03:23, 12 July 2010 (UTC) 2279:18:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 2226:review other users' edits 2204:02:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC) 2111:04:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 2088:01:20, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 1971:02:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC) 1957:Something wrong with the 1744:Pointless name-calling... 1610:with four tildes (~~~~). 1393:22:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 1157:User talk:Stephan Schulz‎ 1130:featured article criteria 62:or add a question to the 48:To leave me a new message 3715:Think you might want to 3651:14:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 2997:Counterproductive edits. 2245:Special:OldReviewedPages 2185:02:46, 14 May 2010 (UTC) 1998:Needed Consensus on the 1992:07:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 1523:Other wiki encyclopaedia 641:Flood geology/chronology 143:Knowledge (XXG):ROLLBACK 94:I opened up a mediation 3510:"Fringe views" on Jesus 2419:Young Earth creationism 2290:Objections to evolution 2162:03:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC) 1351:01:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 1115: 3946: 3588: 3459: 2920:WP:Conflict resolution 2367:mediation mailing list 2359:mediation request page 2217: 2209:You are now a Reviewer 1941:in the American south, 1875:Thanks for that info. 1580: 1054:Talk:Nativity of Jesus 69:Archived Discussions: 3953:! Details are on the 3941: 3886:Arbitration Committee 3820:Arbitration Committee 3458: 3419:Creation Science edit 2959:Thanks for uploading 2363:Committee chairperson 2351:Request for mediation 2216: 2116:Genesis creation myth 2000:Genesis creation myth 1615:articles for deletion 1579: 1548:flood geology article 189:Request for Mediation 2965:image copyright tags 2961:File:Izzy Cooper.jpg 2526:list of participants 1651:William M. Connolley 1606:. Please be sure to 1263:See my last post in 1155:Your recent edit to 1097:The meaning of this? 434:Revert on Noah's Ark 3824:arbitration process 3614:Chronology of Jesus 2395:Mediation Committee 2365:or e-mailed to the 1943:and only there. -- 1705:Quoting Genesis in 886:. If you continue, 742: 433: 242:Mediation Committee 3951:Golden Bay / Mohua 3947: 3902:arbitration policy 3836:arbitration policy 3478:fair use rationale 3460: 2634:dispute resolution 2530:list of open tasks 2440:dispute resolution 2218: 2125:skeptics (or even 1893:non-neutral edits. 1608:sign your comments 1581: 1529:this encyclopaedia 1434:Talk:Flood geology 1229:NZ swine flu cases 900:dispute resolution 505:Talk:Flood geology 503:There is a RfC on 470:Answers in Genesis 90:ABC hypothesis FYI 3978:Be in touch with 3733: 3728:reven i susej eht 3649: 3644:reven i susej eht 3353:Hi! Would you be 3219:More canvassing. 2622:three-revert rule 2617:three-revert rule 2540: 2539: 2534:project talk page 2528:. Please see our 2428:three-revert rule 2423:three-revert rule 2190:Fellow YEC Editor 2081: 2030:Sorry, you can't 1990: 1985:reven i susej eht 1691:templated message 1679:article probation 1642:Sanctions warning 1470:three-revert rule 1391: 1120:I have nominated 1047:Nativity of Jesus 1041:Nativity of Jesus 884:three-revert rule 879:three-revert rule 723:Hamish & Andy 631: 599: 463:Christian Skeptic 230: 229: 39: 38: 4022: 3992: 3987: 3870: 3732: 3730: 3725: 3704: 3648: 3646: 3641: 3485:my contributions 3367: 3362: 3052:Creation science 2951: 2929: 2913: 2895: 2894: 2846: 2845: 2801: 2800: 2735:OK, I've checked 2721: 2720: 2668: 2667: 2615:. Note that the 2604: 2511: 2504: 2421:. Note that the 2410: 2398: 2378: 2303: 2223: 2167:Age of the earth 2075: 1989: 1987: 1982: 1947: 1867: 1672: 1464:, or you may be 1459: 1404: 1403: 1387: 1151:Please take care 1021:higher criticism 877:. Note that the 868: 630: 628: 623: 598: 596: 591: 219: 184: 177: 23: 16: 4030: 4029: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4000: 3999: 3990: 3985: 3936: 3931: 3930: 3871: 3863: 3844:the voting page 3810: 3748:Book of Genesis 3744: 3741:Book of Genesis 3726: 3721: 3713: 3696: 3684: 3658: 3642: 3637: 3633: 3567: 3545: 3512: 3453: 3421: 3392:SkyWriter (Tim) 3388: 3363: 3358: 3351: 3198: 3108: 2999: 2984:ImageTaggingBot 2957: 2945: 2927: 2893: 2887: 2882: 2876: 2844: 2838: 2833: 2827: 2799: 2793: 2788: 2782: 2767:reliable source 2719: 2713: 2708: 2702: 2666: 2660: 2655: 2649: 2638:page protection 2598: 2548: 2544:Book of Genesis 2470: 2444:page protection 2404: 2384: 2374: 2347: 2317: 2286: 2230:two-month trial 2221: 2211: 2192: 2169: 2141: 2118: 2095: 2065: 2028: 2009:on my talk page 2004: 1983: 1978: 1945: 1912: 1891:Again with the 1889: 1865: 1855: 1835: 1780: 1746: 1710: 1689:The above is a 1666: 1644: 1574: 1525: 1480:. Thank you. - 1453: 1430: 1410: 1400: 1385:KillerChihuahua 1361: 1231: 1188: 1153: 1118: 1094: 1084:(contributions) 1068:(contributions) 1043: 931: 862: 815: 752:Talk:Noah's Ark 748: 745:Talk:Noah's Ark 685:manual of style 681: 643: 624: 619: 592: 587: 580: 544: 524: 522:Abortion debate 474: 459: 436: 393: 340: 305: 288: 256: 251: 210: 175: 135: 92: 12: 11: 5: 4028: 4026: 4018: 4017: 4012: 4002: 4001: 3943:Golden Bay Air 3935: 3932: 3909:the candidates 3872: 3865: 3864: 3862: 3859: 3813: 3809: 3804: 3786: 3785: 3772: 3768: 3767: 3743: 3738: 3712: 3709: 3683: 3681:Global Warming 3677: 3657: 3654: 3632: 3629: 3566: 3563: 3544: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3511: 3508: 3452: 3449: 3420: 3417: 3404:see next post 3387: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3350: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3325:Dylan Flaherty 3311:RomanHistorian 3297:Dylan Flaherty 3283:RomanHistorian 3275: 3274: 3273: 3263:Dylan Flaherty 3259: 3256: 3249: 3246: 3231: 3221:Dylan Flaherty 3206:RomanHistorian 3202:Gospel of Luke 3197: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3180:Dylan Flaherty 3155:Dylan Flaherty 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3137:Dylan Flaherty 3135:Four corners. 3112:Dylan Flaherty 3107: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3088:Dylan Flaherty 3057:Dylan Flaherty 3048: 3047: 3037:Dylan Flaherty 3018:Dylan Flaherty 3006:recently tried 2998: 2995: 2956: 2953: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2922:. As a fellow 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2889: 2883: 2862: 2861: 2840: 2834: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2795: 2789: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2715: 2709: 2684: 2683: 2662: 2656: 2597: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2567:controversial. 2547: 2541: 2538: 2537: 2512: 2502: 2501: 2469: 2466: 2403: 2400: 2383: 2346: 2343: 2341: 2316: 2313: 2285: 2282: 2256:BLP violations 2210: 2207: 2191: 2188: 2168: 2165: 2146:Global Warming 2140: 2139:Global warming 2137: 2117: 2114: 2094: 2091: 2064: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2032:call it a hoax 2027: 2024: 2003: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1959:American South 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1911: 1908: 1888: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1854: 1851: 1834: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1779: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1753:Stephan Schulz 1745: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1709: 1703: 1687: 1686: 1675:Global warming 1665: 1664:Global warming 1662: 1643: 1640: 1573: 1569:nomination of 1564: 1563: 1562: 1524: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1452: 1449: 1429: 1426: 1409: 1406: 1399: 1396: 1360: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1279: 1230: 1227: 1187: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1152: 1149: 1117: 1116:Noah's Ark FAR 1114: 1093: 1090: 1078:carl bunderson 1062:carl bunderson 1042: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 988: 987: 986: 985: 962: 961: 930: 927: 926: 925: 861: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 814: 809: 747: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 680: 675: 674: 673: 642: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 579: 576: 575: 574: 543: 540: 523: 520: 502: 500: 499: 467: 458: 455: 435: 432: 431: 430: 392: 387: 386: 385: 363:Raymond Arritt 347:global warming 339: 337:Global warming 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 304: 301: 287: 284: 283: 282: 255: 252: 245: 231: 228: 227: 226: 225: 224: 223: 202: 196: 185: 174: 171: 169: 167: 166: 134: 131: 130: 129: 91: 88: 56: 55: 37: 36: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4027: 4016: 4013: 4011: 4008: 4007: 4005: 3998: 3997: 3994: 3993: 3988: 3981: 3976: 3974: 3971: 3967: 3963: 3958: 3956: 3952: 3944: 3940: 3933: 3929: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3916: 3915: 3910: 3905: 3903: 3899: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3882: 3879: 3878: 3869: 3860: 3858: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3808: 3805: 3803: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3773: 3770: 3769: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3753:Theroadislong 3749: 3742: 3739: 3737: 3736: 3731: 3729: 3724: 3718: 3710: 3708: 3707: 3703: 3700: 3695: 3694: 3689: 3682: 3678: 3676: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3662:creation myth 3655: 3653: 3652: 3647: 3645: 3640: 3630: 3628: 3627: 3623: 3619: 3615: 3611: 3606: 3603: 3599: 3597: 3593: 3587: 3584: 3580: 3575: 3573: 3564: 3562: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3542: 3538: 3535: 3533: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3509: 3507: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3495:. Thank you. 3494: 3490: 3486: 3481: 3479: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3466: 3457: 3450: 3448: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3424: 3418: 3416: 3415: 3411: 3407: 3402: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3386:Rapture Intro 3385: 3381: 3378: 3376: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3366: 3361: 3356: 3349: 3346: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3257: 3254: 3251:Step 3: Read 3250: 3247: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3237: 3235: 3232: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3195: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3172: 3170: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3129: 3127: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3105: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3080: 3078: 3075: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3053: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3014: 3010: 3007: 3003: 2996: 2994: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2976: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2954: 2952: 2949: 2937: 2933: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2912: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2898: 2892: 2886: 2881: 2880: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2860: 2857: 2855: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2843: 2837: 2832: 2831: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2804: 2798: 2792: 2787: 2786: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2771:Flood geology 2768: 2763: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2746: 2743: 2741: 2738: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2724: 2718: 2712: 2707: 2706: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2677: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2665: 2659: 2654: 2653: 2647: 2645: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2609: 2603: 2595: 2589: 2586: 2584: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2545: 2542: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2522:cryptozoology 2519: 2518: 2513: 2510: 2506: 2505: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2467: 2465: 2464: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2453: 2451: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2415: 2409: 2401: 2399: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2382: 2379: 2377: 2370: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2344: 2342: 2339: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2325: 2320: 2314: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2283: 2281: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2267: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2248: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2237:autoconfirmed 2233: 2231: 2227: 2215: 2208: 2206: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2189: 2187: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2166: 2164: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2138: 2136: 2135: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2115: 2113: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2092: 2090: 2089: 2086: 2084: 2079: 2074: 2070: 2063: 2060: 2056: 2053: 2051: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2025: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1988: 1986: 1981: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1951: 1948: 1942: 1939:Quite common 1938: 1937: 1936: 1933: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1916:Little sawyer 1909: 1907: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1886: 1882: 1879: 1877: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1868: 1862: 1861:Scare quotes 1858: 1852: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1832: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1809: 1807: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1777: 1773: 1770: 1768: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1743: 1737: 1734: 1732: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1708: 1704: 1702: 1701: 1698: 1694: 1692: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1671: 1663: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1649: 1641: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1616: 1611: 1609: 1605: 1600: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1578: 1572: 1568: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1522: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1458: 1450: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1427: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1407: 1405: 1397: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1344: 1341: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1314: 1312: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1280: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1256: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1228: 1226: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1185: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1150: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1106: 1099: 1098: 1091: 1089: 1088: 1085: 1082: 1079: 1073: 1072: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1048: 1040: 1030: 1027: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1003: 999: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 984: 981: 979: 975: 971: 966: 965: 964: 963: 960: 956: 952: 947: 946: 945: 944: 940: 936: 928: 924: 921: 919: 916: 915: 914: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 891: 885: 880: 876: 872: 867: 859: 853: 849: 845: 841: 840: 839: 836: 834: 831: 830: 829: 828: 824: 820: 813: 810: 808: 807: 804: 802: 797: 796: 792: 788: 782: 781: 777: 775: 772:The lede for 770: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 746: 736: 732: 728: 724: 719: 718: 717: 714: 712: 709: 708: 707: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 679: 676: 672: 669: 667: 663: 662: 661: 660: 656: 652: 648: 647:Flood geology 640: 634: 629: 627: 622: 615: 614: 613: 610: 608: 605: 604: 603: 602: 597: 595: 590: 584: 573: 570: 568: 564: 563: 562: 561: 557: 553: 552:Kaiwhakahaere 549: 541: 539: 538: 534: 530: 521: 519: 518: 514: 510: 506: 498: 495: 493: 490: 489: 488: 487: 483: 479: 471: 466: 464: 456: 454: 453: 449: 445: 441: 429: 426: 424: 421: 420: 419: 418: 414: 410: 404: 402: 401:John Remsburg 398: 391: 388: 384: 381: 379: 375: 374: 373: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 338: 335: 329: 326: 324: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 313: 311: 302: 300: 299: 296: 293: 286:sarfati book? 285: 281: 278: 276: 272: 271: 270: 269: 265: 261: 260:GusChiggins21 253: 249: 243: 239: 235: 222: 218: 215: 214: 209: 206: 205: 204: 203: 200: 194: 190: 186: 183: 179: 178: 172: 170: 165: 162: 160: 156: 155: 154: 153: 150: 148: 144: 140: 132: 128: 125: 124: 120: 116: 112: 111: 110: 109: 106: 105: 101: 97: 89: 87: 86: 85: 80: 79: 74: 73: 67: 65: 61: 53: 49: 46: 45: 44: 43: 34: 30: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 3983: 3977: 3972: 3964:flying into 3959: 3948: 3912: 3906: 3883: 3875: 3873: 3811: 3787: 3745: 3727: 3722: 3714: 3711:Project: YEC 3692: 3685: 3659: 3643: 3638: 3634: 3610:tangentially 3609: 3607: 3604: 3600: 3595: 3591: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3568: 3546: 3534: 3513: 3482: 3463: 3461: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3425: 3422: 3403: 3389: 3377: 3352: 3236: 3199: 3171: 3151: 3128: 3109: 3079: 3049: 3015: 3011: 3000: 2977: 2958: 2944: 2878: 2872: 2856: 2829: 2813: 2784: 2778: 2742: 2704: 2678: 2651: 2646:from editing 2641: 2606: 2599: 2585: 2549: 2516: 2471: 2457: 2455: 2452:from editing 2447: 2412: 2405: 2387:MediationBot 2375: 2371: 2348: 2340: 2321: 2318: 2287: 2268: 2249: 2234: 2219: 2193: 2170: 2149: 2142: 2126: 2122: 2119: 2096: 2085: 2066: 2052: 2029: 2005: 1984: 1979: 1956: 1940: 1932: 1913: 1890: 1878: 1859:- see also, 1856: 1836: 1808: 1781: 1778:Edit warring 1769: 1747: 1733: 1711: 1688: 1667: 1645: 1621:Please note: 1620: 1619: 1612: 1601: 1582: 1526: 1512: 1474:edit warring 1454: 1431: 1415:Happywith006 1411: 1401: 1364: 1362: 1348: 1315: 1285: 1265:this section 1255: 1232: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1195: 1192: 1189: 1177: 1154: 1119: 1104: 1100: 1095: 1074: 1057: 1044: 1026: 980: 973: 969: 932: 920: 892:from editing 887: 863: 860:January 2009 835: 816: 803: 798: 783: 779: 778: 771: 749: 713: 692: 688: 682: 668: 644: 625: 620: 609: 593: 588: 581: 569: 545: 525: 501: 494: 475: 460: 437: 425: 405: 394: 380: 341: 325: 306: 289: 277: 274:guidelines. 257: 234:MediationBot 212: 207: 168: 161: 136: 122: 103: 93: 83: 77: 71: 68: 64:village pump 57: 47: 41: 40: 32: 26: 3962:the airline 3955:meetup page 3914:voting page 3517:Jason Quinn 3086:Thank you. 2971:, click on 2642:you may be 2596:August 2010 2448:you may be 2319:Rossnixon, 2173:Creationism 2093:Creationism 1910:Creationism 1377:December 25 1105:Hojimachong 888:you may be 776:says this: 310:Storm Rider 4004:Categories 3970:Wellington 3898:topic bans 3832:topic bans 3666:Dougweller 3631:YEC or OEC 3552:GDallimore 3355:interested 3253:WP:CANVASS 2918:) to seek 2779:invariably 2613:Flood myth 2553:Dougweller 2491:Spiral5800 2475:Spiral5800 2271:Courcelles 2026:AGW Theory 2013:EGMichaels 2011:. Thanks. 1946:King Öomie 1866:King Öomie 1629:Erwin85Bot 1497:Peter Deer 1482:Peter Deer 1438:Dougweller 1122:Noah's Ark 758:. Thanks, 60:help pages 52:click here 33:since 2017 3980:Schwede66 3894:site bans 3828:site bans 3789:This blog 3751:thoughts? 3688:this edit 3679:Edits to 3618:WickerGuy 3572:WP:FRINGE 3497:J Milburn 3438:Gwilenius 3406:Gwilenius 3279:this edit 3106:Too bold? 3002:This edit 2973:this link 2969:this list 2762:WP:Weasel 2737:WP:Weasel 2699:WP:Weasel 2630:consensus 2569:Griswaldo 2436:consensus 2402:July 2010 2284:Mediation 2252:vandalism 2127:primarily 1895:Quit it. 1840:Jstanierm 1715:MegaSloth 1381:January 6 1373:Christmas 1092:Excuse me 896:consensus 812:Christmas 689:Re-Gifted 529:Korky Day 444:NathanLee 115:talk page 3574:puts it 3470:fair use 3261:Got it? 2775:policies 2608:edit war 2414:edit war 2391:operated 2355:declined 2329:ClassArm 2222:reviewer 2177:Agathman 2103:SQGibbon 2036:Uncle Ed 1677:, is on 1585:deletion 1138:Vassyana 904:Eeekster 871:edit war 844:Rklawton 819:Rklawton 678:Ghosting 292:David D. 238:operated 193:accepted 147:Andrew c 133:Rollback 42:Welcome! 3986:Schwede 3543:Talking 2816:Rapture 2644:blocked 2450:blocked 2393:by the 2324:Rapture 2154:Moriori 2131:Ἀλήθεια 1707:Abraham 1466:blocked 1428:Copyvio 1363:But do 1058:greatly 890:blocked 743:RFC at 409:MonoApe 240:by the 3966:Tākaka 3818:. The 3365:Orator 3348:WP:YEC 2928:Gniniv 2824:WP:AN3 2691:WP:BRD 2302:Gniniv 2196:Gniniv 1963:Gniniv 1788:WP:3RR 1552:LowKey 1533:LowKey 1389:Advice 1324:Avenue 1298:Avenue 1269:Avenue 1239:Avenue 1161:Vsmith 1124:for a 1081:(talk) 1065:(talk) 626:Marlin 621:Orange 594:Marlin 589:Orange 509:LowKey 478:LowKey 359:WP:ANI 295:(Talk) 217:scribe 72:page 1 3723:Wekn 3360:Novus 3074:Jesus 2916:WP:TE 2891:edits 2869:WP:EW 2842:edits 2820:Jesus 2797:edits 2717:edits 2695:WP:EW 2664:edits 2458:raeky 2078:cont. 1980:Wekn 1833:Jesus 1595:and " 1462:Jesus 727:Somno 697:Somno 355:WP:TE 139:Jesus 3923:talk 3884:The 3852:talk 3797:talk 3793:PiCo 3779:talk 3775:PiCo 3757:talk 3717:join 3693:Jess 3670:talk 3639:Wekn 3622:talk 3556:Talk 3521:talk 3501:talk 3442:talk 3410:talk 3396:talk 3329:talk 3315:talk 3301:talk 3287:talk 3267:talk 3225:talk 3210:talk 3196:Luke 3184:talk 3159:talk 3141:talk 3116:talk 3092:talk 3061:talk 3041:talk 3033:this 3022:talk 2988:talk 2932:talk 2885:talk 2879:Jess 2873:will 2836:talk 2830:Jess 2818:and 2791:talk 2785:Jess 2711:talk 2705:Jess 2658:talk 2652:Jess 2573:talk 2557:talk 2495:talk 2479:talk 2349:The 2333:talk 2306:talk 2292:and 2275:talk 2264:here 2200:talk 2181:talk 2158:talk 2123:just 2107:talk 2099:here 2069:this 2040:talk 2017:talk 2002:page 1967:talk 1961:??-- 1920:talk 1901:talk 1853:Edit 1844:talk 1821:talk 1796:talk 1757:talk 1719:talk 1655:talk 1633:talk 1599:"). 1556:talk 1537:talk 1501:talk 1486:talk 1442:talk 1419:talk 1369:here 1328:talk 1302:talk 1294:here 1273:talk 1243:talk 1220:talk 1216:PiCo 1165:talk 1142:talk 1136:. -- 1134:here 1002:talk 998:PiCo 955:talk 951:PiCo 939:talk 935:PiCo 929:Noah 908:talk 848:talk 823:talk 791:talk 787:PiCo 774:Noah 764:talk 756:here 731:talk 701:talk 693:Rove 655:talk 651:PiCo 583:This 556:talk 533:talk 513:talk 482:talk 448:talk 440:here 413:talk 367:talk 351:WP:V 264:talk 117:. - 98:. - 96:here 3973:and 3812:Hi, 2934:) 2924:YEC 2376:AGK 2308:) 2300:.-- 2254:or 2073:2/0 1897:Ben 1817:Ben 1792:Ben 1625:bot 1567:AfD 1478:3RR 1379:or 1365:not 902:. 760:Ben 345:at 213:WjB 123:Boy 119:Roy 104:Boy 100:Roy 50:, 4006:: 3991:66 3925:) 3917:. 3896:, 3854:) 3830:, 3799:) 3781:) 3759:) 3697:· 3672:) 3624:) 3558:) 3550:. 3523:) 3503:) 3480:. 3444:) 3412:) 3398:) 3331:) 3317:) 3303:) 3289:) 3269:) 3227:) 3212:) 3186:) 3161:) 3143:) 3118:) 3094:) 3063:) 3043:) 3024:) 2990:) 2950:}} 2946:{{ 2575:) 2559:) 2497:) 2481:) 2335:) 2277:) 2266:. 2247:. 2202:) 2183:) 2160:) 2152:. 2109:) 2042:) 2019:) 1969:) 1922:) 1903:) 1846:) 1823:) 1798:) 1759:) 1721:) 1697:TS 1695:-- 1657:) 1635:) 1558:) 1539:) 1531:. 1503:) 1488:) 1444:) 1421:) 1330:) 1304:) 1275:) 1245:) 1222:) 1167:) 1144:) 1102:-- 957:) 941:) 910:) 850:) 825:) 793:) 766:) 733:) 703:) 657:) 558:) 535:) 515:) 484:) 450:) 415:) 369:) 353:, 266:) 187:A 84:p3 81:, 78:p2 75:, 66:. 3921:( 3850:( 3795:( 3777:( 3755:( 3702:♥ 3699:Δ 3668:( 3620:( 3554:( 3519:( 3499:( 3440:( 3408:( 3394:( 3327:( 3313:( 3299:( 3285:( 3265:( 3223:( 3208:( 3182:( 3157:( 3139:( 3114:( 3090:( 3059:( 3039:( 3020:( 2986:( 2930:( 2888:| 2839:| 2794:| 2714:| 2661:| 2571:( 2555:( 2493:( 2477:( 2369:. 2331:( 2304:( 2273:( 2198:( 2179:( 2156:( 2105:( 2080:) 2076:( 2038:( 2015:( 1965:( 1918:( 1899:( 1842:( 1819:( 1794:( 1755:( 1717:( 1653:( 1631:( 1554:( 1535:( 1499:( 1484:( 1440:( 1417:( 1326:( 1300:( 1271:( 1241:( 1218:( 1163:( 1140:( 1004:) 1000:( 974:Y 970:X 953:( 937:( 906:( 846:( 821:( 789:( 762:( 729:( 699:( 653:( 554:( 531:( 511:( 480:( 446:( 411:( 365:( 262:( 250:. 201:. 195:. 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index