215:
many, many creationists have, frankly, used as fodder for lies (sometimes merely wishful but often enough wanton.) I have not reverted your change since the fact of "soft tissue" fossils is fairly old hat, and without controversy, UNTIL some idiot (no reference to yourself, as I've not read you claimimg this at all) starts interpreting "soft" to mean "fresh," or at least "unfossilized." I began work on Wiki with this article in looking up basics with my son, who shares with me a great fascination with fossils and dinsaurs, and found that what may possibly be an interesting discovery was being used to, no way to mince words here, lie by those with no interest in science or dinosaurs at all. Please follow the real intention of Wiki rules in NPOV, rather than tossing them at my feet. If I re-worked your articles in similar ways, I feel sure your umbrage would be impressive in its bombasticism.
434:
agree to "intentional" but you are lumping knitting-needle quickies and medically sanctioned or performed acts where full term would have led to a healthy child and a live mother together with cases - subject to possible error, of course, where the baby obviously would not have survived, or would have survived as a creature unable to function as a human, but confined to life support systems, and cases where the mother was likely to die. These issues are complex and understanding them is not assisted by assuming that all or most abortions are "intentional deaths" with the implication, still, despite the change from "deliberate" to "intentional" that the abortions occurred because a mother or mother to be, wed or unwed, simply did not want a child or one more child.
903:
legacy. The way to achieve NPOV is not to delete negative parts of his legacy, but to add. For example, you can add that some
Christians have disavowed anti-Semitic Christians - i.e. add informative content, rather than delete (it would help if you could name a few. I say this not at all because I doubt you, but only because it would add even more informative content). You are concerned about proportion. Well, for Jews Christian anti-Semitism is a very serious and major issue. Yes, this is one point of view. But I think the way to achieve NPOV is not to delete it, but again, to add balancing content. I actually tried to do this myself, stating that many Christians have sought to reconcile with Jews and foster mutual respect. If you want to
1651:, the passage that refers to James "the brother of Jesus the so-called Christ" is enough for many scholars to consider Josephus's account authentic." Is that acceptable to you? I'm sorry to be so verbose in my comments, but my editing articles such as this makes me worried about hurting feelings or misrepresenting my intentions or attitude. Harmony is so much better than dischord, yes? Also, please excuse the little edits to my comments here. I tend to be a bit pedantic at times, and the way I write things initially doesn't always sound as I'd like it to sound! :) Cheers! --
1346:
upon the comment you left on my talk page, you understand. As you remarked that you use
Firefox, I'd just like to add that the app is dependent upon IE components, and as such you'll need to have Internet Explorer installed (which, thanks to MS fascism, is standard on all Windows machines). Nonetheless, I know that AWB (which uses many of the same components my tool does) had problems with Firefox, and as such Firefox testers are definitely needed. By the way, I'll likely be making a download available within the next couple of hours, and I'll do my best to notify you.
36:
309:
833:(XXG) is not the place to post propaganda or polemics and is not even suitable for insinuating subtle messages intended to sway people's convictions. There are ample communication channels available for all of that. It's not a question of whether your views on abortion are right or wrong; rather that Knowledge (XXG) is the wrong place to keep pushing them.
1525:
559:
links to remove, its difficult, but only so many are not duplicate information to whats in the article(which is the point of external links other wise they should be referenced). If you have time could you provide some suggestions, no one has commented on which links to remove yet, on the peer reveiw or the talk page. Thanks and sorry for rambling.
128:
990:
I tried putting it inside nowiki braces etc but the page was locked until I deleted it. Maybe you might complain to the Wiki authorities if you like the link there - it sure messes up editing the page. And maybe somebody, even I, will have a more material comment to make in a reply to you. I assume others were blocked as well.
1171:
The goal is to have a knowledgebase on christianity from a distinctly "C(hristian)POV" rather than the NPOV. It is not meant to be a mere
Christian Encyclopedia, but to foster a real sense of community. I'd like to include things like current events, news, stories, and anything that would add to both
989:
Yes, sorry - I was fixing some typos on your talk page (probably not your bad spelling - do not remember - but it is distracting to read misspellings - and they could cause confusion). But even after many tries saving, Knowledge (XXG) kept saying that little link was a bad one and I could not save.
935:
Second, far more than three people hold these views. Hundreds of works over two hundred years hold this untenable position. It is a small cottage industry on the internet. We need to acknowledge this view, while pointing out that the position is rejected by nearly everyone in the field. By indicating
1759:
I am curious why you deleted the category
Polygamists from Abraham. Did he not have more than one wife? Is the category inappropriate? Someone has recently created this category and has been very proficient in labeling every LDS possible with the category. I assuem that what is good for the goose
1646:
I noticed I accidentally removed the whole paragraph (I wrote all this on the talk page too, but wanted to continue dialogue with you so we can reach agreement), which I left untouched, and I apologize for removing this part unnecessarily. I rewrote the passage to leave it without weasel language.
1243:
It doesn't seem too complicated a bit of
English - which is the only angle I have on that - that in the context of that paragraph it would be very easy to underestimate his importance. Perhaps he should simply be described as "important" (in the limited context of the subject) which would leave out
832:
you will see ample discussion and general agreement that abortion, government sanctioned execution and homicide in the context of warfare are not to be included within the definition of murder for the purposes of the encyclopedia article. The reasoning behind this is explained fairly well. Knowledge
247:
I'd say that was slightly iffy, but certainly in no way truly vandalism. What is far more worrying is why didn't you sign your name? Although I'll assume you were the person who "reverted" it. Hmm.. taken a look now at the "revert", that is very.... sneaky. Something I'd say is undoubtedly far worse
962:
I've added a section to the talk page to see if we can get a consensus on what the paragraph should say. If enough of us then are satisfied, we can avoid endless debates with proponents of one view or another, revert with a polite reference to the discussion and be done with it. Everyone is invited
952:
Dear Ross: We're up to at least five academics, most not historians, who maintain this view. (see the bios on the Jesus talk page) While we're within our rights not to mention it (only one of seven encyclopia articles I've read even talks about the minority view) we're going to see it over and over
558:
article but I have one note about external links. It was suggested that 15 links was prime for a FA in the peer review, now I don't think I'm going to get it there becasue no one wants to change the article but I would like to improve the article. I was wondering if you had any suggestions on which
210:
Ross: Your page here, as well as your earlier attempt at allowing the YEC "position" interpreting the NYT+ articles concerning the T.Rex "soft tissues" I believe allowed me to assume you to be a YEC. If not (on re-reading your post to me, I afraid I've noted that you actually don't deny the fact),
1275:
Thanks for sharing that critique of the DH myth... Yes, I call the DH a myth, because it is entirely fabricated from very weak premises, it is unattested, unprovable, entirely conjectural, and based on personal reconstructions that are all guesswork, but after repeating the same lines long enough
1247:
As to the case of god, there is an obvious oddity in having both God and god used in a single article. I favour the lower case, for various general and specific reasons, but I wonder if you'd like to look at it again and see whether it seems consistent in the state you set it to. As for the edit
754:
Looks like you found one (1) "geophysicist" to proffer, but he has no publications I can find other than in the house organ "International
Conferences on Creationism, Pittsburgh, PA, July 18-23, 1994:" and even that is a conference proceeding that is probably not refereed. But the passage (which I
468:
for example. I am afraid that Eric
Weisstein's "World of Physics" gets this one wrong, too, but I have never got him to fix anything. It just shows that there is a lot of nonsense out there, and apparently Stephan Schulz and I have identified a chap who is good at locating but failing to identify
433:
You wrote, in execrable
English (it's for its) and apparently saying the opposite of what you meant (by having omitted "discussion" before "page"): "Cause of death in the United States - how about intentional instead of deliberate. Further discussion of Abortion should kept for it's page." OK - I
214:
I still have, shall I say, suspicions about the value of your contributions to the "dinosaur" article. The new "Nature" link is clearly about an unusually detailed case of fossilization, and therefore a completely different (and undebated) matter from the TRex article at question; an article which
1345:
Sorry for taking so long to respond. I do believe you to be sincere in your intentions, and as such I will add you to the safe list. I just wanted to make clear that the tool is to be used for removing vandalism, and not for edit-warring or any other destructive purpose, which I do believe, based
1324:
controversial articles (something I wish I had more time to do myself), I fear that your only interest in this tool is the ability to make a point by monitoring your watchlist and immediately reverting any edit you don't like, which clearly is not what VP should be used for. As your edit wars and
1463:
feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some
902:
I responded to your comment on the Jesus Talk page. I just want to add two specific comments. First, whether those
Christians who were anti-Semitic were true Christians or Christians in name only is a matter for Christians to debate. I think anything done in Christ's name is part of Christ's
725:
a "proven fact". Not proven "beyond all doubt" certainly (but, then, nothing except
Descartes' 'cogito ergo sum' is beyond ALL doubt) but we're about as certain about evolution in the descriptive sense as we are about the earth being (approximately) spherical or the sky being blue. (we're not
1319:
vandalism, and while I do see several reversions in your contribs, the vast majority of them were content disputes rather than vandalism. I also see that you have been involved in several serious content disputes, have participated in edit warring (though not much recently), and have been
1425:
You should be aware that many people dislike having other people edit comments from other individuals even when one is correcting minor spelling errors. In any event, talk pages do not need to be polished and so it is a waste of time to correct other individual's trivial spelling errors.
755:
shall revert again) referred to "geologists" in the plural. I am looking for two geologists that you seem to think exist who have published in places like Journal of Geophysical Research, Geology, or Geosphere (both publ by Geological Society of America), one of the journals listed on
164:
Ross: I believe that Brian's use of Template:Test4 on this page is inappropriate. That said, it would do no harm to leave such text on your talk page. In my opinion, it reflects more on him than it does on you. And, while I am here, I think that you should engage in discussion at
464:
is nonsense (or gibberish) I might counter just one little misunderstanding there - the author says: "A looked-for diffraction pattern did not appear. " which is incorrect. The pattern appeared but did not shift as the Earth rotated - a significant result, even if a null one. See:
786:
Please don't call my removal of a link 'Censorship'. It is an editorial change, with which I posted my reasoning on the talk page. Calling it 'censorship' is knee-jerk reactionary that does not lead to a constructive environment for expression of ideas and discussion of articles.
1487:
If I understand your edit comment correctly, this is a suggestion and not yet fact, so I've removed it from the article. If you re-add it, please add a source. It also makes little sense without the derogatory comments by Cleese, so you should add some background material as
939:
Third, by forcing me to fight a battle with people I agree, you take the time I can invest in helping to make the rest of the article balanced. Since I work in a theological library, that time can be well spent, if you will examine the footnotes on this paragraph alone.
1086:
Please recognize that options 1 & 3 have nearly the same number of votes. While I understand your conviction, and personally agree, I think a vote for option 3 would help us acheive consensus and avoid the use of option 1--which you probably agree violates
1534:. I am thankful for your kind words and confidence in me. Even though it failed, constructive criticism was received. In the next few months, I intend to work on expanding my involvement in other namespaces and try a few different subjects than in the past. -
1047:
Just a reminder: do not respond to Rob at all if he repeats old arguments or gets abusive. If he changes a consensus paragraph, revert it. Keep track of your reverts and only do it twice. If we can do this, nothing will come of it except frustration for Rob.
1574:, such edits are hard to catch, and all you do is create additional strain on the already overworked RCP. In view of the warnings you received above I think it is necessary to remind you that you can and will be blocked from editing for repeated vandalism.
720:
Well, I'm not sure Gould's definition is "twisted", it reflects scientific and philosophical usage. The (technically) correct term for the sense in which you're using 'fact' is "doubtful proposition" but be that as it may, evolution in the descriptive sense
847:
Limitation might be a better word; if you want, you should start a discussion in the talk page. I must warn you though, that from the few days I've hung around the ID page, it seems like ID is more of a battle ground than an actual place of discourse and
1329:
use the tool, but rather that I would like for you to post a comment on my talk page explaining your intentions with the tool and answering my concerns here, so that I can reach a decision. Thanks. (Feel free to delete this comment after you've read it.)
953:
again, due to its popularity on the web. We blunt some of the edit enthusiasm if we acknowledge it and its status as a minority view. We also can all then set guard over it and not allow changes without any fear of serious grief for our actions. --
928:
I reverted the recent changes you made to the second paragraph. A lot of work and much discussion have gone into this and I'd appreciate the courtesy of a discussion before you erase hours of work and threaten to unleash venom from some editors.
768:
Evidence of animals trying to excape the flood. Brand, L.R. and Tang, T., 1991. Fossil vertebrate footprints in the Coconino Sandstone (Permian) of northern Arizona: Evidence for underwater origin. Geology, vol. 19,pp. 1201–1204. (mentioned here
585:
It looks like you've stirred up quite a fuss here on Knowledge (XXG). Your cause is all but illegitimate, but I encourage you to use a lot more tact, especially if you plan on sticking around for awhile longer. I would encourage you to read
1276:
over and over again without any shred proof, they begin to think they it is suddenly convincing enough to be indisputable... Have you seen the section I put at the top of my talk page where I explain another reason for doubting it? Regards,
169:
before making YEC-related edits. Indeed, it is a good plan to discuss such changes anywhere that you plan to introduce them. Many creationists have engaged in abusive POV-pushing at this encyclopedia and there is a widespread suspension of
174:
about the subject. I do not condone this prejudice among other editors, but the way to accommodate is to propose your changes on the talk page and argue the case for them there. It is not possible to hold useful discussions through edit
1314:
You recently requested permission to use VP, but after looking over your talk page and contributions I'd like to express a few reservations that I have in adding you to the allowed list. First of all, VP is intended to be used to revert
1240:"Marcion's influence on Christianity cannot be underestimated." Is there some theological argument that I am missing there - with another editor having also changed (someone else's correction) of understimated to overestimated?
1291:
I did look at the article briefly once, but decided not to get involved, as I was satisfied that it at least had a paragraph explaining that there was some disagreement... (buried way down deep in there, but at least it was
1258:
Sorry, did not mean to revert the Marcion thing, which I have no idea about. As for "god", I just assumed you were being provocative. I will have another look to see if "god" was used correctly anywhere in the article.
1032:
as a candidate for featured article. Since you've taken a recent interest in it, I thought you might like to have another look to see if there are any further tweaks you'd like to make to that end. Cheers
812:
to the "See also" section. I was kind of disappointed to see that you had done that. Listen, I wish there was a better way to say this, but all other considerations aside, to you realize how just-plain-old
189:
for that original act and for the subsequent blanking of his (admittedly clumsy) attempts to communicate with you. I think it is important that such an apology should be unconditional if it is to appear
1502:
Thanks for your note on my talk page. I presume you are the Hillcrest Drive resident with whom I had email correspondence in 2000. My daughter Annabel now lives in that city and is the "voice" of
907:
to this, for example with specific details, I think that would be great! In short, rather than delete, add. I think the ultimate affect would result in the balance both of us are committed to.
865:
But, I feel a bit of a longer discussion about the fetus debate stuff is needed on that page. We could go back to the footnote thing I had set-up before if the look really bothers you. Cheers,
693:
It is impossible to directly observe natural selection (how could this happen??), what we observe is organisms adapting to their environment (which is evolution, not natural selection). Regards,
185:
Ross: Upon further reflection, I feel that I should also say that I think that your characterisation of evolution as pseudoscience was inappropriate and that I think that you should apologise to
972:
I proposed a slightly different last sentence than the one currently proposed. Would you change back your vote if that sentence were used instead (removed the lack of contemporary BS phrasing).
1102:
I understand, but haven't decided what to do. Consensus should be 80% but it might be hard to get. (P.S. No need to remind me when new voting is required - I check at least once per day.)
590:
before you continue any further. It's good to know there's others out there who share one's convictions, but if we are to be listened to, we must do so in a much more strategic manner.
1248:
summary - "regularise case" is intended to describe making the case the same throughout, by all means suggest an alternative explanation, but "unexplained" is not a good description.
1175:
I know you are busy but I am actively seeking new sysops/admins to help me build this site up, and I would be positively thrilled if you could contribute in any capacity whatsoever.
211:
I'll take you at your word. I will be leaving the article as it stands until I feel up to doing the big work (who knows when or if?), since your link so far checks out as legit.
296:
and stop injecting crap into articles. Shouldn't you be out protesting at abortion clinics? What good is your work here? You're wasting everyone's time, especially your own. --
1455:
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at
506:- a simple quantity without direction. He confuses the two - so his "energy" has a direction to it - what do you do if it is thermal energy, or stored energy in a battery?
1593:
I apologize if my capacity to AGF didn't stretch quite far enough in this case; I agree of course that the Ussher reference is completely at home in the article. regards,
1617:
Adding the template doesn't actually semi-protect pages, only Administrators can do that, the template just serves to alert people after somebody has semi-protected :/.
758:, Journal of Petroleum Geology, Tellus, the Journal of Metamorphic Geology, Journal of Paleontology, Journal of Petrology, Geophysical Journal International or similar.
875:
To be in keeping with the rest of the list, it needs to be a one liner. If we can't get a suitable summary in one line, then make it shorter still and have a footnote.
502:
To see just one side of the absurdity of Mr. Novak's idea about energy, note that momentum is a vector - it has a direction - that of the velocity, while energy is a
819:
that is? I kind of have to take it as "I'm bored, so I guess I'll just waste a tiny bit of someone's time". Well, that someone was me, and I was less than pleased.
451:
had nothing to do with your edit (and, by the way, the article is nonsense and the author is a total kook who misunderstands even high school science). Thanks! --
1531:
1399:
I click it in. Listbox does not fill. I imported the admin Userlist Ok though. I will reset computer and try again (can be flakey at times). I am also logged in
200:
Ross: I admire the promptness with which you apologised and the complete absence of self-justification. I wish that more people could apologise so honourably.—
1717:
Read John 20:2 again. The "other disciple whom Jesus loved" is the "beloved Disciple". I read elsewhere that this disciple is "grammatically male". See also
936:
that they are mostly not scholars in this field, we achieve that. If we do not, we will have this fight all over again, even if the current crop go away.
1172:
an understanding of Christianity, but also its enjoyment. I'm looking for help to build a resource that could really enrich the lives of Christians.
1570:
I am not sure if this was bad faith vandalism or a good-natured joke, but please do not indulge in either. Especially on little-watched pages like
1193:
We mean to be interdenominational, but yeah, we're having trouble defining CPOV. So far the only real tension is between fundamentalist Protestant
331:
Stop purposely adding content that is not only contrary to discussion (discussion that you have not participated in) but factually incorrect. --
1183:
Christian POV. The Roman Catholics and Mormons probably call themselves Christians and will argue with born-again Christians over the content.
292:
Listen, I get it. You have opinions and you like sticking them into articles. The problem is that at Knowledge (XXG), POV is not allowed. Read
1320:
legitimately accused of vandalism and POV-pushing in the past. While I do appreciate that you've taken it upon yourself to contribute to some
1209:
1165:
I know you are interested in christianity, and I recently started a new wiki over at wikicities which is on the subject of christianity.
98:
656:
Oh, that was brilliantly witty! Thanks, I needed a dose of humor. And I appreciate the core message also - Best Wishes to you as well!
1140:
885:
Is this real wikipedia policy or just your own aesthetic sensibilities? Because I don't think wikipedia has a prettiness criteria...
94:
1403:
thu Firefox and VandalProof - is that OK? Maybe I'll move my entry on your page up to Installation problems, although it's not the
387:
448:
Hi Rossnixon, could you please stick to descriptive edit summaries, especially when editing contentious articles? Your link to
735:
Well I can put you right on one thing. The sky is a mixture of blue and violet. It's just that our eyes see the blue better.
1464:"vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at
519:
for more gems to share with us, Mr. Nixon. Yes, pseudoscience isn't confined to creationists. No one ever said that it was.
376:
Whoops! You are partly correct Brian. I removed a misspelt word "psuedoscientific; then changed the remaining weasel word.
124:
you've deleted my comments on your talk page. You can do that all you want on your user page, but not on your talk page.
76:
64:
1201:. (People tend to use their Knowledge (XXG) neames over there). Everyone else seems to get along okay...so far, anyway.
1549:
537:
325:
278:
232:
147:
1666:
You are incorrect, read variuos versions in various bibles and none stated what you say. Which version are you using?
1037:
932:
First of all, "tiny" and "fringe" are not very neutral terms, no matter how much you and I might think of it as so.
1669:
John 20:8 says Then the other disciple, who went to the tomb first, also went inside,and then he saw and believed.
1456:
1448:
1367:
1308:
1297:
1281:
351:
Stop leaving misleading edit summaries. You called your change of "pseudoscientific" to "scientific" a "typo fix",
43:
1557:
1648:
318:
216:
1465:
912:
482:
If you only look at the article itself, you are missing most of the goodies. Check the home page and then
1696:
John 20:2 states:Then she ran away and came to Simon Peter and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved...
1125:
282:
236:
139:
1764:
1293:
1277:
727:
694:
756:
308:
1507:
1227:
886:
866:
657:
640:
617:
520:
204:
194:
179:
1129:
828:
Ross, please stop wasting peoples' time with a reversion war. If you read through the Talk page for
687:
286:
248:
what you did. As such I think I should consider reverting it myself. Better check some stuff first.
240:
1724:
1631:
1598:
1579:
1553:
1473:
1439:
1410:
1390:
1375:
1351:
1335:
1262:
1186:
1105:
991:
878:
849:
759:
682:
491:
452:
398:
363:
339:
302:
260:
186:
156:
52:
17:
703:
OK. I have read those links. But most people understand the normal dictionary meaning of the word
791:
1092:
1652:
1571:
1489:
1205:
1133:
1121:
908:
507:
470:
435:
1088:
1008:
page and have asked if anyone else believes the tag should be removed. Feel free to comment.
293:
1761:
1012:
976:
820:
90:
1742:
171:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1618:
1535:
1198:
1194:
1077:
1063:
1049:
964:
954:
944:
591:
201:
191:
176:
1690:
John 20:1 state: Now on the first day of the week Mary Magdalene went to the tomb early.
1722:
1628:
1594:
1575:
1503:
1469:
1437:
1408:
1386:
1371:
1347:
1331:
1260:
1184:
1103:
876:
773:
736:
708:
667:
627:
587:
571:
560:
424:
393:
377:
358:
334:
297:
258:
151:
1430:
788:
166:
1766:
1749:
1726:
1711:
1684:
1655:
1634:
1621:
1606:
1587:
1559:
1548:
Just to let you know that a meetup is planned in Auckland for the 25th of June (see
1510:
1492:
1477:
1441:
1412:
1394:
1379:
1355:
1339:
1301:
1285:
1264:
1252:
1230:
1213:
1188:
1152:
1107:
1097:
1080:
1066:
1052:
1015:
994:
979:
967:
957:
947:
915:
889:
880:
869:
852:
837:
823:
794:
776:
762:
739:
730:
711:
697:
660:
643:
630:
620:
603:
594:
574:
563:
544:
523:
510:
494:
473:
455:
438:
427:
405:
380:
370:
346:
312:
262:
252:
219:
107:
1746:
1427:
1249:
1202:
834:
541:
413:
104:
569:
1029:
707:, meaning that the statement is a proven truth - not Gould's twisted definition.
466:
1009:
973:
600:
530:
257:
You better check, Mathmo. That edit was from July last year! And I always sign.
249:
51:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1459:. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new
1076:
We're approaching a consensus that I think can stick. Please come and vote. --
1034:
677:
1703:
14:51, 22 August 2006 (UTC) seems to be open to interpretation doesn't it--
943:
If you disagree with this, please come to the talk page and discuss it. --
490:
that kinetic energy is not (1/2)mv, but rather what we know as impulse. --
809:
1524:
1166:
1120:
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Knowledge (XXG), as you did to
127:
1718:
829:
805:
503:
516:
Wow, Mr. Novak is about as cranky as the come. You might check out
1738:
1005:
859:
555:
688:
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_fact-and-theory.html
1325:
vandalism were some time ago, I'm certainly not saying that you
639:
No, I thought you were being serious, were you being facetious?
423:
Your anti-intellectual assualt on reality is not welcome here.
89:
Would you care to comment on my suggested mass revision to the
1707:
14:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Or do they contradict each other?--
1676:
14:45, 22 August 2006 (UTC) I used KJV, NKJV and NAB. et al --
858:
I understand that the line break might look a little messy in
626:
Thanks - although I assume you thought I was being facetious.
536:
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be
324:
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be
30:
483:
1179:
It may be dificult to do a Christian POV without specifying
462:
449:
126:
412:
Thankyou Ross for all that you are doing. God bless you.
1436:
Sorry, I'm a bit of a pedant when it comes to spelling.
1565:
1552:
for more details), and that you are cordially invited.
1226:
Substantial is not strong enough, nearly all would do.
614:
517:
271:
225:
673:
Hi Rossnixon, if you haven't done so yet please read:
683:
Talk:Charles_Darwin#Evolution_is_a_fact_and_a_theory
99:
Talk:Creation science/Phantym rewrite proposal/talk
1672:Other does not translate into "beloved" does it?--
1366:I just wanted to let you know that a download of
1407:that has failed, just some aspects of the UI.
1020:
678:Evolution#Distinctions_between_theory_and_fact
461:In support of the fact that the cited article
95:Talk:Creation science/Phantym rewrite proposal
285:. If you want to experiment, please use the
239:. If you want to experiment, please use the
8:
554:I am grateful for you being involved in the
1721:which offers James as another possibility.
1468:and I will do my best to help you. Thanks.
1385:What's the problem with the update button?
1128:. If you would like to experiment, use the
1699:does this not imply two seperate people?--
1680:14:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC) Italics NKJV--
726:absolutely certain about those either...)
1647:I wrote: "Nonetheless, according to the
469:pseudoscientific nonsense. (guess who)
281:to Knowledge (XXG). It is considered
235:to Knowledge (XXG). It is considered
49:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1021:Noah's Ark featured article candidate
7:
1244:the question of which way is up.
1058:Fast One being pulled on Jesus talk
1719:http://jesusdynasty.com/blog/?p=15
1370:has recently been made available.
150:from editing Knowledge (XXG). --
24:
1236:your revert remains unclear to me
921:Second Paragraph of Jesus Article
804:Hi Ross. Say, I saw your edit at
1523:
307:
34:
1550:Knowledge (XXG):Meetup/Auckland
1530:Thank you for voting for me at
1421:Editing other peoples comment's
1222:Substantial versus overwhelming
800:...a little bit disappointed...
27:Archive 1 (May 2005 - Sep 2006)
1641:Regarding Historicity of Jesus
1062:Quorum call. Come and vote. --
1004:I've begun a discussion on he
545:09:13, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
540:from editing Knowledge (XXG).-
488:undeniable, mathematical proof
328:from editing Knowledge (XXG).
220:23:23, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
1767:01:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1662:Mary Magdalene as an apostle?
1451:is Now Available For Download
1108:09:18, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
1098:01:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
1081:14:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
1067:00:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
1053:20:16, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1038:12:27, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1016:20:10, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
995:17:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
980:16:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
968:14:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
958:12:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
948:02:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
661:00:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
644:18:19, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
631:09:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
621:01:09, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
604:09:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
97:page and is discussed on the
93:page? The revision is on the
916:13:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
890:00:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
881:09:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
870:03:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
853:03:51, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
838:22:30, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
824:20:24, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
795:10:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
777:11:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
763:07:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
740:06:25, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
731:21:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
712:00:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
698:12:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
599:Thanks for noticing, Ross --
595:17:48, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
575:01:05, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
564:01:58, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
1750:21:51, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1727:21:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1712:15:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1685:14:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1362:A Download Is Now Available
524:04:42, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
511:05:30, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
495:00:54, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
474:00:30, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
456:13:20, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
439:05:08, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
428:19:00, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
1782:
1560:00:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
1511:22:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
1493:09:08, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
1478:06:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
1461:Rollback All Contributions
1457:User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof
1442:20:44, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
1431:20:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
1265:10:46, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
1253:04:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
1231:02:23, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
1214:23:09, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
1189:01:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
263:22:18, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
253:17:54, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
1760:is good for the gander.
1656:04:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
1635:02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
1622:02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
1413:10:24, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
1395:10:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
1380:09:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
1356:07:41, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
1340:22:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
1302:02:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
1286:01:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
1153:14:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
406:23:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
381:23:59, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
371:23:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
347:23:26, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
313:13:08, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
1607:07:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
1588:15:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
207:3 July 2005 07:28 (UTC)
197:2 July 2005 21:28 (UTC)
182:2 July 2005 18:52 (UTC)
161:2 July 2005 16:30 (UTC)
108:21:38, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
1649:Anchor Bible Dictionary
1158:I would love your help.
1072:Jesus Talk Vote (again)
750:Baumgardner for example
613:Your edit summary here
609:Love your edit summary!
319:Creationist cosmologies
1466:User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs
1197:and Jehovah's Witness
131:
1741:, I suggest you read
1613:Semi-protect template
130:
47:of past discussions.
1089:WP:NPOV#Undue_weight
808:where you had added
138:. The next time you
85:Hi, care to comment?
1124:. It is considered
1028:I'd like to put up
277:Please stop adding
231:Please stop adding
18:User talk:Rossnixon
843:Intelligent Design
769:tinyurl.com/d8q22)
132:
1627:I'll do it. :-)
1605:
1586:
1572:5th millennium BC
1541:
1540:
1211:
1207:
1148:
1122:User:WAvegetarian
925:Dear Rossnixon,
486:, where he gives
484:Energy Misdefined
416:14th August 2005
403:
368:
344:
82:
81:
59:
58:
53:current talk page
1773:
1737:Ross, regarding
1597:
1578:
1527:
1520:
1519:
1498:Hello, relative!
1483:John Cleese Dump
1210:
1206:
1151:
1137:
1043:When Rob is Back
985:bad link removed
666:Fact/theory and
404:
401:
392:
369:
366:
357:
345:
342:
333:
311:
305:
300:
226:Creation science
217:TheCryingofLot49
159:
154:
116:Stop vandalizing
91:Creation Science
73:
61:
60:
38:
37:
31:
1781:
1780:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1757:
1735:
1697:
1691:
1670:
1664:
1643:
1615:
1568:
1546:
1544:Auckland meetup
1518:
1508:Robin Patterson
1500:
1485:
1453:
1449:VandalProof 1.1
1423:
1420:
1364:
1312:
1273:
1238:
1224:
1199:User:Inkybutton
1195:User:Homestarmy
1160:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1143:
1118:
1074:
1060:
1045:
1023:
1002:
987:
923:
900:
887:Citizen Premier
867:Citizen Premier
863:
845:
802:
784:
752:
671:
658:KillerChihuahua
654:
641:KillerChihuahua
618:KillerChihuahua
611:
583:
552:
534:
521:Joshuaschroeder
446:
399:
391:
388:personal attack
364:
356:
340:
332:
322:
303:
298:
275:
229:
222:
157:
152:
118:
87:
69:
35:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1779:
1777:
1756:
1753:
1734:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1695:
1689:
1668:
1663:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1642:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1614:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1567:
1563:
1554:GeorgeStepanek
1545:
1542:
1539:
1538:
1528:
1517:
1514:
1504:Arena Manawatu
1499:
1496:
1484:
1481:
1452:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1422:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1363:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1311:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1272:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1237:
1234:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1168:is the site.
1159:
1156:
1145:
1139:
1138:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1073:
1070:
1059:
1056:
1044:
1041:
1022:
1019:
1001:
998:
992:Carrionluggage
986:
983:
922:
919:
899:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
862:
856:
844:
841:
801:
798:
783:
780:
771:
770:
760:Carrionluggage
751:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
715:
714:
691:
690:
685:
680:
670:
668:Charles Darwin
664:
653:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
634:
633:
616:is priceless.
610:
607:
588:The Art of War
582:
579:
578:
577:
551:
550:External links
548:
533:
527:
515:
500:
499:
498:
497:
492:Stephan Schulz
477:
476:
453:Stephan Schulz
445:
444:Edit summaries
442:
431:
430:
419:
411:
384:
383:
321:
316:
289:. Thank you.
274:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
243:. Thank you.
228:
223:
213:
117:
114:
112:
86:
83:
80:
79:
74:
67:
57:
56:
39:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1778:
1769:
1768:
1765:
1763:
1754:
1752:
1751:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1694:
1688:
1686:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1667:
1661:
1657:
1654:
1650:
1645:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1633:
1630:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1620:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1602:
1596:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1585:
1583:
1577:
1573:
1566:
1564:
1562:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1551:
1543:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1526:
1522:
1521:
1515:
1513:
1512:
1509:
1505:
1497:
1495:
1494:
1491:
1482:
1480:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1462:
1458:
1450:
1447:
1443:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1429:
1414:
1411:
1409:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1328:
1323:
1318:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1251:
1245:
1241:
1235:
1233:
1232:
1229:
1221:
1215:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1173:
1169:
1167:
1163:
1157:
1155:
1154:
1142:
1141:CONTRIBUTIONS
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1115:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1090:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1079:
1071:
1069:
1068:
1065:
1057:
1055:
1054:
1051:
1042:
1040:
1039:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1011:
1007:
999:
997:
996:
993:
984:
982:
981:
978:
975:
970:
969:
966:
960:
959:
956:
950:
949:
946:
941:
937:
933:
930:
926:
920:
918:
917:
914:
910:
906:
897:
891:
888:
884:
883:
882:
879:
877:
874:
873:
872:
871:
868:
861:
857:
855:
854:
851:
842:
840:
839:
836:
831:
826:
825:
822:
818:
817:
811:
807:
799:
797:
796:
793:
790:
782:See Also link
781:
779:
778:
775:
767:
766:
765:
764:
761:
757:
749:
741:
738:
734:
733:
732:
729:
724:
719:
718:
717:
716:
713:
710:
706:
702:
701:
700:
699:
696:
689:
686:
684:
681:
679:
676:
675:
674:
669:
665:
663:
662:
659:
651:
645:
642:
638:
637:
636:
635:
632:
629:
625:
624:
623:
622:
619:
615:
608:
606:
605:
602:
597:
596:
593:
589:
580:
576:
573:
570:
568:
567:
566:
565:
562:
557:
549:
547:
546:
543:
539:
532:
529:Vandalism at
528:
526:
525:
522:
518:
513:
512:
509:
505:
496:
493:
489:
485:
481:
480:
479:
478:
475:
472:
467:
463:
460:
459:
458:
457:
454:
450:
443:
441:
440:
437:
429:
426:
422:
421:
420:
417:
415:
409:
407:
402:
397:
396:
389:
382:
379:
375:
374:
373:
372:
367:
362:
361:
354:
349:
348:
343:
338:
337:
329:
327:
320:
317:
315:
314:
310:
306:
301:
295:
290:
288:
284:
280:
273:
270:
264:
261:
259:
256:
255:
254:
251:
246:
245:
244:
242:
238:
234:
227:
224:
221:
218:
212:
208:
206:
203:
198:
196:
193:
188:
183:
181:
178:
173:
168:
167:Talk:Dinosaur
162:
160:
155:
149:
145:
141:
137:
134:This is your
129:
125:
123:
115:
113:
110:
109:
106:
102:
100:
96:
92:
84:
78:
75:
72:
68:
66:
63:
62:
54:
50:
46:
45:
40:
33:
32:
29:
28:
19:
1758:
1736:
1698:
1692:
1671:
1665:
1653:Chuchunezumi
1616:
1600:
1581:
1569:
1547:
1501:
1486:
1460:
1454:
1424:
1404:
1400:
1365:
1326:
1321:
1316:
1313:
1274:
1246:
1242:
1239:
1225:
1180:
1174:
1170:
1164:
1161:
1134:WAvegetarian
1119:
1116:Vandalizm :)
1093:
1075:
1061:
1046:
1027:
1024:
1003:
988:
971:
961:
951:
942:
938:
934:
931:
927:
924:
909:Slrubenstein
904:
901:
864:
846:
827:
815:
814:
803:
785:
772:
753:
728:Mikkerpikker
722:
704:
695:Mikkerpikker
692:
672:
655:
612:
598:
584:
553:
535:
514:
501:
487:
447:
432:
418:
410:
394:
385:
359:
352:
350:
335:
330:
323:
291:
276:
230:
209:
199:
184:
163:
143:
142:a page, you
136:last warning
135:
133:
121:
120:This is the
119:
111:
103:
88:
70:
48:
42:
26:
25:
1762:Storm Rider
1755:Polygamists
1506:. Kia ora!
1368:VandalProof
1309:VandalProof
963:to come. --
821:Herostratus
652:Best Wishes
531:New Zealand
175:summaries.—
41:This is an
1709:Tomtom9041
1705:Tomtom9041
1701:Tomtom9041
1693:and also
1682:Tomtom9041
1678:Tomtom9041
1674:Tomtom9041
1629:Antandrus
1619:Homestarmy
1536:CTSWyneken
1228:KimvdLinde
1203:Arch O. La
1078:CTSWyneken
1064:CTSWyneken
1050:CTSWyneken
1030:Noah's Ark
965:CTSWyneken
955:CTSWyneken
945:CTSWyneken
848:editing.--
592:MedCorpman
304:™
158:™
122:fifth time
1470:AmiDaniel
1387:AmiDaniel
1372:AmiDaniel
1348:AmiDaniel
1332:AmiDaniel
1126:vandalism
774:RossNixon
737:RossNixon
709:RossNixon
628:RossNixon
572:Newbie222
561:Newbie222
425:Aaarrrggh
386:(removed
378:RossNixon
299:brian0918
283:vandalism
237:vandalism
190:genuine.—
153:brian0918
140:vandalize
77:Archive 3
71:Archive 2
65:Archive 1
850:Rousseau
816:annoying
810:Abortion
789:Localzuk
581:Barnstar
279:nonsense
233:nonsense
1747:JoshuaZ
1490:gadfium
1428:JoshuaZ
1405:install
1317:obvious
1292:there!)
1250:Midgley
1130:sandbox
1000:POV tag
542:gadfium
538:blocked
414:Andycjp
326:blocked
294:WP:NPOV
287:sandbox
241:sandbox
148:blocked
105:Phantym
44:archive
1743:WP:3RR
1632:(talk)
1532:my RFA
1516:My RfA
1488:well.-
1327:cannot
1013:(talk)
977:(talk)
898:legacy
830:Murder
806:Murder
792:(talk)
601:JimWae
504:scalar
250:Mathmo
205:(Talk)
195:(Talk)
180:(Talk)
172:WP:AGF
101:page.
1739:Death
1687:AND
1181:which
1094:Aiden
1025:Ross
1010:Gator
1006:Jesus
974:Gator
860:death
835:Myron
556:Jesus
395:BRIAN
360:BRIAN
355:. --
353:twice
336:BRIAN
272:Death
202:Theo
192:Theo
187:Brian
177:Theo
16:<
1474:Talk
1401:both
1391:Talk
1376:Talk
1352:Talk
1336:Talk
1322:very
1298:ውይይት
1282:ውይይት
1162:Hi,
1035:PiCo
913:Talk
705:fact
400:0918
365:0918
341:0918
144:will
1733:3RR
1595:dab
1576:dab
1294:ፈቃደ
1278:ፈቃደ
1132:. —
1091:. —
911:|
905:add
508:Pdn
471:Pdn
436:Pdn
390:--
146:be
1745:.
1476:)
1393:)
1378:)
1354:)
1338:)
1300:)
1284:)
1271:DH
1146:•
1048:--
723:is
408:)
1603:)
1601:ᛏ
1599:(
1584:)
1582:ᛏ
1580:(
1556:\
1472:(
1389:(
1374:(
1350:(
1334:(
1296:(
1280:(
1150:•
1136:•
787:-
55:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
