63:
85:
content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about
67:
26:
40:, a forum on Knowledge for new editors to ask questions about editing Knowledge, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
71:
135:
111:
82:
75:
107:
100:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
150:
87:
158:
143:
139:
134:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
52:
70:
your contributions to
Knowledge, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
149:
For information on how to contribute to
Knowledge when you have a conflict of interest, please see
154:
37:
86:
that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by
48:
93:
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
47:
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have!
121:
25:
120:
to the
Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
162:
56:
114:, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
130:
so that you do not accidentally breach
Knowledge's content policies.
98:
Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating
74:
on
Knowledge, you may need to consider our guidance on
106:. Everyone is welcome to provide information about
81:
All editors are required to comply with
Knowledge's
151:our frequently asked questions for organizations
90:and writing with as little bias as possible.
17:Welcome to Knowledge: check out the Teahouse!
8:
104:Be cautious about deletion discussions
7:
14:
61:
24:
57:04:40, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
140:verifiability of information
163:15:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
178:
36:, you are invited to the
66:Hello, Rowangbrand. We
128:Exercise great caution
72:you have written about
136:neutral point of view
83:neutral point of view
76:conflicts of interest
112:deletion discussions
108:independent sources
45:
44:
169:
88:reliable sources
65:
64:
28:
21:
20:
177:
176:
172:
171:
170:
168:
167:
166:
144:autobiographies
62:
59:
41:
19:
12:
11:
5:
175:
173:
153:. Thank you.
132:
131:
125:
122:Knowledge:Spam
115:
101:
46:
43:
42:
31:
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
174:
165:
164:
160:
156:
155:duffbeerforme
152:
147:
145:
141:
137:
129:
126:
123:
119:
118:Avoid linking
116:
113:
109:
105:
102:
99:
96:
95:
94:
91:
89:
84:
79:
77:
73:
69:
58:
54:
50:
39:
35:
30:
27:
23:
22:
16:
148:
133:
127:
117:
103:
97:
92:
80:
60:
49:SarahStierch
33:
34:Rowangbrand
38:Teahouse
68:welcome
32:Hello!
142:, and
159:talk
53:talk
110:in
78:.
161:)
146:.
138:,
124:).
55:)
157:(
51:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
