1825:
the mistake myself of "responding to tone" because of the terseness of your post and my reaction to the pot calling the kettle "involved" and all that. And judging by the comments following mine, I'm apparently not the only one who made that mistake, if a mistake it was. I understand the bit about "due process" and I have the same sentiments myself, which is why I chose to comment in the first place. In my opinion, and this is just personal preference, "due process" would involve people coming to the noticeboard, stating their involvement - if any, and dispassionately stating their case, much the way Medeis did (though with a tad more evidence). It's totally fine, IMO, for "involved" editors to comment, as long as they state their involvement, which I believe Medeis did. Actually, I think a !vote from you would have been quite helpful if it had said something along the lines of
877:
occasion tried to rein in the excesses of MM, there is much to suggest that you are more of a facilitator for one of the more obvious pov-pushers on these types of articles (another one being CMDC). It would probably be best to let Hector make their own mind up, even though you are entitled to your opinion. Either way, MM is not going to be around here for much longer unless they dramatically change their attitude. Even allowing for newbie status & some spurious templating, it is a long time since I've seen someone's talk page contain quite so many warnings & advisories over such a short period without them being blocked, and still the suspicions seem to persist that this is a sock account. If you want to help MM then the best thing you can do is not blame everyone else & the system for MM's failings: you're kidding him and yourself. -
1377:
apologize for speaking in a way that could imply that. In truth my original comment (months ago) was aimed more at steeltrap who was attempting to redefine gun control to mean "only gun control implemented by democratic governments and applied in a non-discriminatory manner", and you may have gotten hit by wide aim. For that I apologize as well. We are not likely to agree on much politically I think, but I do hope to be able to work better with you in perhaps a friendly (or at least cold war) rivalry. I think that during my brief ban there have been some very positive suggestions on the GC talk page that might satisfy (or at least minimize dissatisfaction) on both sides of the argument, and I hope that we can collaborate on improving the article in a way that includes all POVs neutrally and appropriately.
2503:
facts, evaluate opinions, or sort out the references and histories behind messages such as yours. They can be damaging. I've posted about this in the past in other contexts, because I believe that it is a negative factor in any community or social system, online or not. It's not I who cares about "last word" -- that was Sitush's rather telling reaction. He's peevish and childish sometimes, way too involved in his self-image as a village elder here, and he projects his frustrations on others. Not always, but this is a clear example of his having done so and you stepped in the middle of it. "Give me pause"? I suspect you are too thoughtful in real life to think that Sitush's anger is my responsibility.
2074:- I don't know whether to interpret your tone as light-hearted, critical, or disparaging of my remarks. At any rate and more to the point, I don't understand what you're trying to say. It seems you agree with me that Hayek looked through but did not say that he'd read Block's book. What else are you trying to say? Please state it clearly and without the personal remarks and ironic (?) tone. I'm trying to discuss this matter with the assembled editors on that thread and I think that can only occur if we try to be clear and straightforward. No hard feelings but please don't make any further personal remarks, disparaging or otherwise. You can make those here or on your own talk page if you wish. Thanks.
2587:) is topic-banned from editing articles and other pages relating to the Ludwig von Mises Institute or persons associated with it, either living or deceased. This topic-ban does not extend to articles concerning Austrian economics but not related to the Ludwig von Mises Institute; however, should SPECIFICO edit problematically in the broader area, the topic-ban may be broadened if necessary through the discretionary sanctions. SPECIFICO may request the lifting or modification of this topic-ban not less than one year from the close of this case.
851:
have done it. Miles explained that to you. You chose to escalate and turn that simple dispute into a far-and-wide discussion of his behavior to which you recruited various editors who have complained to or about MilesMoney in the past. I didn't find most of your diffs very convincing. They omitted context. As an experienced editor, you might have realized that as with most ANI threads, almost any reference to a complex set of interactions can set off a free-for-all. I was sorry to see you do that. I don't believe it was constructive.
2499:
sometimes. I am far from the only editor who's pointed out to him when he strays in that way. That sort of talk page note is not uncommon. I'm sure you've gotten and left them from time to time. So have we all. Sitush's response was not in that collegial tone. My reply to him acknowledged that. There was nothing "passive aggressive" about it. I chose not to engage his specific testy reply and, having seen that he is "retired" and knowing from prior statements of his that he has real world challenges these days, I wished him well.
855:
happen to be one of the more knowledgeable and clear-thinking editors around some of these articles and so I hope you will consider what you might have done differently or could do better in the future to support him and his navigation of this unusual community on WP. Certainly your ANI was ill-conceived, ill-timed, ill-stated. It only served to promote the usual confused battleground chatter. I don't know whether the ANI is still open, but if it is I again urge you to withdraw it.
2871:. If you wish to submit evidence for the committee to consider in reaching its decision, please do so now. The evidence phase of the case ends soon, and evidence submitted after the deadline may not be considered. Further advice on submitting evidence, and what evidence the committee will accept, is linked at the top of the evidence page. Please contact me or the other drafting arbitrator if you require more time to submit evidence. Thank you. For the Arbitration Committee,
1230:
posts with lots of citations, page numbers, and italics marks (often copy and pasted without attribution from C.Vs) constitute strong evidence. They don't bother using whatever analytical skills they may have to determine the relevance of that paragraph to notability. Editing requires logical and analytical skills, but from reading the AfDs, you wouldn't know it involved anything other than knowing how to Google and use the "copy and paste" feature of the keyboard.
1211:
effectively as the next. It is Hoppe's "democracy the god that failed" in action. Life is not a democracy. Some editors are better equipped than others to deal with particular articles or kinds of content. The real problem however is the aggressive behavior with which some editors deny the problem. No essay will change that. It's up to the community to deal with disruptive behavior and personal attacks which prevent improvement of WP articles.
31:
2056:"We?" What? You made a disparaging personal reference which was not supporting any purpose of the thread. It would be to your credit to remove it but that's your choice to make. I notice that you're a regular contributor to RSN and it occurs to me you may not have been aware that these Austrian Economics articles are under Community Sanctions and are currently the subject of an Arbitration proceeding. 20:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
847:
helping him. I don't want to stick up for him. I don't recall ever having exhibited "friendliness" to him. What I have done is speak up for due process, fairness, truthtelling, and what I view as basic civil liberties which I expect to prevail on the web just as in real social or governmental processes. To be blunt, to suggest that my motivation or goal is anything else is to question my good faith and honest behavior on WP.
2416:
255:
2720:
at that, but if you feel that I've said something to express veiled displeasure with you, it's very unlikely I did that intentionally. You said something about us not being the best of friends, but I don't recall interacting with you much at all. As to indirectness, I tend to err on the other side. Just ask Srich, who's regularly calling "bullshit" when I post on his talk page. Anyway thanks for the visit.
2371:
2310:
2987:
1439:
582:
1827:"I consider myself involved, and have been on Miles's side of disputes many times...I believe he's improving because blah blah blah and he apologized for xyz here and hasn't done pdq in 2 months blah blah blah. I also believe that User:A, User:B, User:C, who have commented here, are involved and that the closing admin should weigh that in their decision."
3334:(at nearly every corner) which make the finest horchata (as I've never had horchata anywhere else, I cannot claim NPOV on the matter). I sometimes even take it to my weekend-dedicated co-workers as a treat (accompanied by a breakfast taco of course) during certain busy seasons of the year. Store-bought horchata simply does not compare. If you're ever in the
125:
3389:
1414:(and responsibilities) of citizenships. Insinuating that the Nazis were 'anti-gun' or 'pro-gun control' because they wanted to apply gun control (and all other) laws differently to one group of people is as misleading and muddle-headed as saying that Orthodox Jews are 'anti-carnivore' or 'pro-vegetarian' because they preach against eating pork.
2603:) is topic-banned from editing articles and other pages relating to the Austrian school of economics, the Ludwig von Mises Institute, or persons associated with them, either living or deceased. Carolmooredc may request the lifting or modification of this topic-ban not less than one year from the close of this case.
2719:
You know that I do neither of those things. As best I can recall we are on the same article/talk no more than once a month. Am I missing something? If so please don't hesitate to be explicit about it. When something is bothering me, I tend to be rather direct about it. Sometimes people take offence
1930:
There's no hounding going on. If you are unwilling or unable to behave according to site policy you're sooner or later going to blocked or worse. On WP, we discuss content not contributors. We provide specific policy-based reasoning to support our views, and we do not disparage or misrepresent our
1677:
Hi there Sitush, and welcome back to my talk page. I'm not knowledgeable about Arbcom, but I suspect you may be more worldly than I in such affairs. I took a quick look at the contributor counts for the article and talk histories for Gun
Control. In general, would those editors whose participation
895:
want to help MilesMoney. On that count, you don't seem to have understood my remarks at ANI or here, but that's OK too. You're welcome to read more closely or ignore. Let's call this thread closed. My post on the ANI was a direct response to a point mooted there by... Sitush. Follow the indents. On
846:
Hello, Hector. You did the right thing to move the conversation here and off the ANI. I have been a harsh critic of Miles and have instructed him repeatedly to tone down his manner of speech and to ignore various editors who troll newbies for blood on WP. He's not my friend. I have no interest in
816:
The bigger message I was getting at in my original comment is that if you really want to support a fellow editor, you need to help them see the ways in which they are unintentionally sabotaging themselves. So often, our natural human loyalties lead us to want to defend the people who have defended
372:
doesn't deserve it, my money is on Srich, since he's too brave to stay in the safe house, and will actively seek to try to seek information from/impersonate the killers.) Since Miles Money appears to be a zombie (he was topic-banned from ALL Austro-libertarian articles prior to 'rising from the dead'
2103:
Not only is it unhelpful but you refuse to state what it's based on, so that it cannot be anything other than empty disparagement which does not contain any seed of resolution. Be that as it may, I again ask you to state your content and policy based response, if any, to my message at RSN so that we
1995:
Hi, Specifico. I'm just speaking as an observer and occasional commenter at RS/N. So, whenever I see your name there, it's all about Hayek and the von Mises
Institute. And it always seems to go off into mild fantasy: Hayek's state of mind, deathbed confessions, etc. This stuff is clearly fascinating
1858:
which doesnāt have template and recommends dispute resolution before WP:ANI, I am bringing this warning about my concerns here. In the last month you have left the following six inaccurate and/or questionable warnings on my talk page, each of which I have debunked and/or labeled harassment. The are
924:
Hey
Specifico, glad to see you back. I hope all is well with you. As you have been one of the regular editors participating in articles related to Austrian Economics, and I was hoping I could convince you to participate in a small experiment on dispute resolution. It's formatted as a simple question
200:
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor, provided the editor has been previously informed as this message does. This notice does not necessarily mean your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited
184:
The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length, bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict, bans on any editing related to the topic, restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors, or any other measures that the imposing administrator believes
1376:
I have come to understand that I may be using a wider definition of holocaust than others generally do. If you interpreted my comment as implying that you were denying the final solution or any of the more widely recognized portions of the holocaust or nazi actions, that was not my intention, and I
1244:
What I don't understand is why the "Keep" editors have added nothing to the article. I've read all the sources. She's as plain as a popsickle. She's just an all
American ordinary person whose name happens to have been remembered by some of the wild and crazy guys from the sixties. Go to any bar
854:
A number of editors spoke up in support of MM and against your ANI. Good for them. I wrote a short post about the social structure of WP. I presume you've read and considered it. I have no interest in helping MM. You should reflect why you continue to be convinced I have such a motive. He does
820:
But there was a consensus of 6 editors who opposed an edit, and MM felt entitled overrruled them all. In essence, telling six people that he believes his opinions matters more than all of theirs combined. That trajectory, if continued, is an unpleasant one. The first six editors he offends will
651:
Upon reviewing the ANI thread, I have blocked you for 48 hours. I have no idea what your or Carol's position on
Austrian economics or any particular issue is. But it is plainly evident that your interpersonal behavior is not in the slightest helpful. Please take the next few days to reconsider your
1824:
I would have placed it somewhere between "attacks the characteristics or authority of the writer without addressing the substance of the argument" (ad-hominem) and "states the opposing case with little or no evidence" (contradiction). I realize that probably wasn't the intention, and probably made
1629:
Hey there Mr. Bink. Do you think those talk page edits will be controversial? You think that Arbcom will want to scrutinize those 6 edits. I returned there 6 months after leaving the article because Mr. Gaijin kindly invited me to an RfC that had been posted. Binksternet, your message is guite a
1229:
To be clear, my 'dull eyed elephants' remark was a metaphor that did not refer to any particular editors. But nonetheless, the AfD articles, particularly Sharon
Presley, provide good examples of the consequences of aggressive yet ignorant editing. It also appears that some editors assume that long
850:
As I understand it the issue on Rosen was a BLP issue and policy is very clear that we err on the side of caution and leave such disputed content out of the article until we can be sure that it would be no violation to include it. Your revert violated this principle. It was wrong. You should not
616:
The link specifically refers to this statement in
Carolmoordc's own words: "Note: If you see some resemblance to the wikipedia article on the Samson Option, I also worked on that and contributed many of the same facts from many of the same sources." -- Nothing to justify your behavior there. You
482:
In a sane world, some admin would require her to deal with the issues you raised instead of trying to create a circus environment by casting blame far and wide. We don't live in such a world, apparently, but I'm not interested in joining that circus so I'm ignoring her canvassing and avoiding that
456:
to avoid what will be a very nasty sanction is never to discuss the motives or actions of other contributors except at centralised noticeboards such as ANI. I've survived under a sanction situation for a long time now: if the people involved in this circus keep their noses clean then AEGS won't be
2498:
Look here, I have no problem with you. Go back and read the initial message I left on his page. It was cordial and direct. In my opinion, Sitush sometimes posts writings that do not advance the noticeboard discussions but rather express his personal dismay, annoyance, or worse. Not always, but
2483:
I think my tone is right for the occasion, and specifically that my header (possibly the harsh part) is. If you think that was a supportive note, or even that it expressed "no conflict", well, it doesn't look like the recipient took it that way. Doesn't that give you pause at all? But it's not my
2250:
Since you seem to have an interest in the rejection of evidence by scholars in the
Misesian tradition, I recommend you read more about "the split" that divided the early CATO Institute. An Austrian economist who DID use data was hired by CATO, and Rothbard was driven into a frenzy at the sight of
2022:
In the context of your RSN comment, I presume you were expressing annoyance at me (phrased as a remark about my words) or that you were denigrating my views, for whatever reason. In either case, your statement was out of place for two reasons. First, it did not contribute to the content/sourcing
1999:
The crucial thing seems to me to be this: when
Knowledge (XXG) is complete (!) neither your fascination with that Institute, nor my feeling of slight boredom on the subject, will matter. If enough people off Knowledge (XXG) have talked about it and written about it, it'll be mentioned. If there's
506:, you are a one-man mischief machine. Please keep on your new best behavior, or "behaviour" as you might say. Especially on my talk page. Sitush, you are welcome on my talk page so far as I know. Only Srich was uninvited, I think, but he posts here all the time anyway. Welcome to my talk page.
417:
I've said it before, but I'll say it again: WP:ANI is desperately random. You never know what a report is going to turn into, or whom it's going to turn against. This one is all about Carol, but she's trying to name everyone who has ever edited an
Austrian economics article, perhaps to spread the
2502:
I've seen you make many thoughtful contributions in the past. However in the current environment around the libertarian articles, the arbitration, and the current ANI, it's problematic to leave misleading notes such as yours in place without comment. Many users here do not take the time to check
2093:
I never disparage any Wikipedians, Specifico. As I've hinted above, I have the impression that your fascination with Hayek leads you to prolong discussions about him and continue to bring up his name in discussion at far greater length than is really useful to the encyclopedia -- perhaps even at
1210:
which are evident on the Austrian and recent AfD discussions, the inability of editors to form reasoned judgments and statements about abstract ideas may simply be insurmountable. There's a strange sense of entitlement, as if "everyman" who stumbles on these articles is equipped to edit them as
232:
I just noticed this and had a couple thoughts. Carol is unquestionably involved here, so I don't think you should take this notification as an indication that your behavior has been disruptive. That being said, it is good to be aware of the discretionary sanctions here so I'm not going to remove
876:
Specifico, I'm glad that I was sat down when I read this. Aside from pointless musings at ANI, which are totally off-topic and have (perhaps inevitably) drawn an equally off-topic response from Carol, I see that you are pontificating here in a similar style. Although it is true that you have on
2266:
What basis do you have for this tale? Please cite your source. Even thought MR is dead, this alleged dustup may have involved others who may still be among us. Most of the Cato fellows have PhD's from mainstream universities, so they would have had to demonstrate proficiency in mathematical
1662:
Let the clerks deal with it but if you see no removal of the striking then email them with a query. Being named in Arbcom proceedings is not really optional, as Mediation is. Of course, the named person may choose not to say anything. There is a tendency among a small group of people, of which
2936:
Don't you have anything more productive to do with your time? Caplan is not affiliated with vMI. QJAE is a refereed peer reviewed journal. Having published there, if in fact he has, does not make him an affiliate of vMI. If you knew anything about Caplan you would not believe there's any
2570:
from editing articles and other pages relating to the Austrian school of economics, the Ludwig von Mises Institute, or persons associated with them, either living or deceased. Steeletrap may request the lifting or modification of this topic-ban not less than one year from the close of this
2023:
discussion because it did not specify which of my statements you were referencing or in what way you felt they were flawed. For that reason, your comment could not have helped move the RSN conversation forward. Second, your remark was not Civil in WP terms, and that's not good WP behavior.
2464:
Hello. I don't consider myself to be in conflict with Sitush. The two of us have exchanged supportive notes on a sporadic and infrequent basis over the past 6-9 months. As he's stated, the Austrian business has at times caused him agitation and he sometimes expresses it in frustrated and
451:
I've forgotten whether I'm allowed here or not but if anyone is "trying to name everyone who has edited an Austrian economics article" then Steeletrap's opening comment here is a more complete example. And, Miles, while it was not a personal attack in my opinion, the safest way for
1829:
That, in my opinion, is more helpful, and more due process, than the threaded back-and-forth that seemed to be going on (not that you were the only guilty party, there, but you did seem most active when I read the section). Anyway, I've probably said too much...sorry for the tldr
435:
For some reason, Rich has decided that the above is a personal attack. As usual, he's a bit vague when it comes to backing up the accusation. For example, precisely how am I attacking her? By saying that she brought up the names of other editors? Rich's accusation rings false.
1996:
to you, but you need to consider your audience, and I don't think you've done that when making comments on RSN. That's really what I meant by "infantile". An inexact metaphor, of course: infants don't speak or write, and as to whether they fantasize, we may not be too sureĀ :)
3399:
regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is
2606:
Editors who have not previously been involved in editing the articles at issue in this case are urged to review these articles to ensure that they are in compliance with the applicable policies and best practices, including neutrality and the policies governing biographical
188:
Prior to any sanction being imposed, the editor shall be given a warning with a link to the community discussion and, when appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and
1819:
edit, but wasn't able to give a proper response until now, which I believe the comment deserves. I suppose "badgering" might have been a bit harsh, and not quite the right word, for which I apologize. As for Ad-hominem, that would be an interesting discussion. On
1513:
Like I said on my talk page, neither Rich nor Wolf are good communicators or cooperative editors. It would be great if either or both could explain their objection and maybe even point to relevant policy, but it may be too much to expect, given prior performance.
204:
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.
1271:- This is really what's needed. WP needs to exclude those who lack the competence or disdain the commitment to edit constructively. If an egalitarian wave of political correctness and kindness to animals overwhelms the editing process here, WP is doomed.
1462:
Agree. That editor in particular has long aroused misgivings among other editors who feel that he is quick to cite acronyms and wikilinks to various policies but refuses to explain under what theory the cited policies support his personal opinions.
479:, which is that I'm quite consciously avoiding the bait. You reported Carol for maligning the motives of others, and her response is... to malign the motives of others, such as myself. This has nothing to do with me and I want nothing to do with it.
3359:
Interesting, I've visited almost every border town in South Texas but surprisingly, we have a large Mexican population in the NY Metro area these days and there's fine fresh-made horchata to be had throughout the area at food trucks, taquerias and
735:
Carol, why are you harassing someone who is currently blocked and has remained silent on their own talk page? What possible benefit could your post bring to Knowledge (XXG)? Please reconsider your deeply hostile and counterproductive behavior.
1563:
Hi. Why list my name there? I've not edited the article for 6 months and I've made about 6 talk page edits over the past 6 months since I stopped editing. Please remove my name from the list. Calling me "core" is simply incorrect. Thank you.
2465:
unconstructive ways. "All's well" means something like "no need to reply, no conflict, just leaving a spontaneous reaction to your recent post." I think your tone is a bit harsh for the occasion. If you didn't mean it that way, no problem.
1190:
Seasons greetings, SPECIFICO. I encourage you to continue the discussion on WP:Competence regarding intelligence. The dull-eyed 'elephant(s) in the room' can no longer be ignored, especially as they haphazardly stampede throughout WP.
780:
Done, sorry (and confused!) that you found that offensive, but clearly, you deserve the right to characterize your relationship or lack thereof however you wish. My apologies for apparently implying something you didn't want
2776:
I have been known to say that more-or-less to show that my positions are based, as best I can, on factors other than "standing up for friends" which one does see at times around here. I make decisions based on facts, and
2267:
methods in order to graduate. I recall that Rothbard himself took maths as an undergraduate at Columbia, and it's surprising that anyone who endured a Math major would find formal thinking abhorrent, or even unsettling.
1098:
especially since this is the English language Knowledge (XXG). Please consider changing them to English so that we can keep Knowledge (XXG) devoid of such insensitivities. I'm still considering whether to report you for
1614:
It is quite a misrepresentation to say "about 6 talk page edits in the past 6 months" when five talk page edits can be observed in the month of December. Five in December shows an active editor, active in the last month.
824:
The point of going to ANI wasn't to say that MM is a bad person, or to say that he should be banned from the project. The point was to say that he needs to change his behavior in order to thrive in our community.
682:
Notification in lieu of official template that doesn't seem to exist for users - Re: your off topic and/or no evidence/diffs and/or manufactured evidence and/or trumped up allegations against me at two recent ANIS
2699:
grudge against anyone at all. My posts are, to the best of my ability, aimed in line with policies and guidelines (especially BLP), and never at personalities. Though I am aware of some editors whose sole
2146:
2138:
181:, if, despite being notified of these restrictions, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Knowledge (XXG), any expected standard of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
2868:
2207:
Saw your synth revert on Gary North. Not sure if that is actually Synth. I realize this is just an essay, but it is an indication that there may not be consensus for the way you are interpreting synth.
697:
2484:
business, I'm (obviously, I hope) not accusing you of anything in an admin capacity, or warning you. Just leaving you a spontaneous reaction. I'm done now. You're quite welcome to have the last word.
949:
Hello Adjwilley. Glad to participate. I am a bit preoccupied with some family matters but I will contribute -- perhaps piecemeal -- and should be able to get my thoughts up in the next week or so.
107:
Hi SPECIFICO, while there's no rule against mentioning warnings/notifications that an editor has received in the past, in the interest of minimizing drama, I hope you won't bring it up in the future.
3100:. Besides, even if he is a tangent subject to Mises, your ban has provisions to expand as necessary. I will be happy to refer this or future edits to the administrators noticeboard in the future. --
3079:
I've left a response on the Arbitration page. Molyneux is not associated with the Mises Institute, but if he were associated, the ban would also prohibit me from commenting on the article talk page.
1729:
Oh, I see. I'm so sorry that Sitush and the Bink might be disappointed. I really have nothing to contribute to the process, else I would have stayed there just to offer my views. Thanks, Collect.
1678:
has been more frequent or more recent than mine also be listed at an Arbcom or, if that's not the case, what criteria are generally applied to select the participants in such proceedings? Thanks.
3258:
Its not undue detail when the issue we're establishing is whether he is a philosopher. I am here on your talk page giving you personal feedback and making a personal request to revert yourself. --
1326:
It's true that WP is a covenant community, but the covenant currently is 'egalitarian' and 'politically correct' insofar as it does not exclude incompetents. Herr Hoppe would not stand for this.
1904:
1292:
As usual, you're both completely wrong. WP is already a covenant community of the sort HHH would embrace. That's precisely why its focused on excluding unwanted views (and those who bear them).
2009:
If this comment seems out of place and irrelevant to you, please, simply ignore it, as you would a friend who gives useless advice because he doesn't actually understand. Enjoy your editing.
3097:
I feel like I was being nice to give you just a simple notification, with no prejudice. The article has several references to Mises, and Molyneux has obviously been a frequent topic there
3063:
2527:
2134:
2126:
925:
and answer, with a hint of RfC/U, aimed at getting participants to talk with one another, recognize potential problems, and with any luck, commit to fixing those problems. The page is at
2666:
There is an RfC on the Gun politics in the U.S. talk page which may be of interest to editors who participated in "RfC: Remove Nazi gun control argument?" on the Gun control talk page.
2860:
1020:
has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Austrian economics". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation.
1764:
1496:
1025:
716:
If you truly believe there is an issue, bring it with actual evidence/diffs to the proper forum and I will be glad to debunk all of your false or extremely trumped up accusations.
2133:
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at
2026:
I hope you'll think about this and consider striking the personal incivility and stating a substantive objection to my view so that I can respond in the proper forum. Thanks.
828:
Really stop and think, in the long term, are you helping MM by supporting his actions? Or is your support, though well-intentioned, making it harder for him to find clarity?
813:
I really wasn't "implying" anything other than that, based on your friendliness towards MM, it was appropriate to list him as your friend. When you objected, I removed it.
3236:. He didn't "study debate" he was a member of the Debate Society, which is an extracurricular activity. Please make your article-related comments on the article talk page.
3062:
Writing to inform you that you should consider the Molyneux article as associated with the Mises Institute, and so falls under the provisions of your topic ban (detailed at
2420:
1959:
and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of useā
1542:
and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of useā
688:
684:
259:
418:
wealth. I guess her actions make sense, in a certain way, but I don't understand why admins put up with it. Don't they know that this makes a laughing stock out of them?
1024:
is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the
2330:
You know full well that editing another editor's talk page comments is unacceptable behavior. I can change my comments, and I did so before you responded. You may not.
1094:
Your use of the German and Russian language in the gun control article in reference to the Jewish and Russian Holocausts could be misconstrued as insensitive or a
703:
551:
My browser's spell-checker enforces American spellings, so I type "behaviour" and it turns into "behavior". If only it could automatically edit out my mischief!
2226:
I think that in this case the juxtaposition leads the reader to conclude that North correctly predicted the troubles at Bitcoin. If so, that would be SYNTH.
2150:
3401:
3396:
2044:
I don't think we need to, Specifico. Remember the exchange between Holmes and Moriarty: "'All that I have to say has already crossed your mind,' said he."
1118:
I disagree. Sentences were not posted. Single words which are typically understood by literate people. Insensitivity, harassment, hate speech? Nope. ā
2346:
I have no idea what you're talking about or why you are so upset. Please don't post here until you can express yourself calmly and clearly. Thanks.
1245:
in Berkeley and you'll find half a dozen relics of that era, now happily living ordinary lives in their million-dollar bungalows overlooking the Bay.
652:
actions and adopt a different approach once the block expires. If you wish, you may request a review of my block by following the procedure listed at
209:
1760:
1033:
817:
us, and to support the people who have supported us. That loyalty has kept our species alive, and I do respect that you want to stick up for MM.
2915:
1582:
I was attempting to make sure I included the correct opposition. I will attempt to remove your name, but I don't know what the policy is on that.
1029:
2670:
1956:
2995:
Message added 14:59, 14 May 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
1821:
2183:
that I have referred or linked to their contributions in the Evidence portion of this arbitration, which is now in the Workshop phase.
1880:
1869:
1863:
2534:
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
1756:
1040:
Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 22 December 2013.
896:
this page, I wasn't addressing you and it's not clear what purpose it serves for you to repeat your opinions in this context. Thanks.
2600:
177:
Any uninvolved administrator may, at his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working on a page within the topic of
1892:
1886:
1132:
Respectfully, I also disagree - while I certainly disagree with specifico's argument, I took his bilingual !vote as a bit of humor.
926:
1963:
1713:
belong in that ArbCom case. As for deciding "participants" - sometimes even Tarot cards won't help in predicting ArbCom <g: -->
1546:
1539:
2814:
And so I get "officially added" as a disputant in the ArbCom case of course -- you may recognize the cast of characters <g: -->
1648:
Do you think I should unstrike their addition to the case, or just let the clerks/coms deal with if he should be involved or not?
2563:
2816:
1801:
1768:
1055:
1017:
586:
2584:
1981:
1776:
2859:
Hi. You contributed to a recent RFC about this topic area. This message is to notify you that the arbitration proceedings at
2000:
endless talk about it on Knowledge (XXG) talk pages, it'll have maybe more exposure than it deserves. (I pointed this out in
1767:, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the
94:
2209:
1969:
1552:
166:
152:
86:
81:
69:
64:
59:
3112:
I see no basis for your claims. File a complaint at Arbcom if you wish, but do not post on my talk page again. Thanks.
2539:
2445:
Seriously. It's even worse than telling somebody to "calm down". And don't tell them "All's well", either. Who are you,
2758:
Hi. Not best friends, or something similar, on the Arbcom thread, no matter. It sounds as if we're on the same page.
2384:
2323:
590:
1206:
Well, unfortunately it is Catch-22 because competence is required to recognize incompetence. Aside from the issues of
2739:. Only that I can point to some who doĀ :( and with whom I do not correspond well. Email me for examples <g: -->
1308:
Bugger off my talk page MilesMoney. You are banned from my talk page until 26 December 04:00 hours UTC. Thus I say.
821:
over look it, but after awhile, the editors he's offended and hurt add up, until he is asked to leave the project.
3215:
is unfounded. The debate source is used to point out that he was in debate at Glendon, the rest of the details are
1146:
Ok, In good faith, I will take it as a bit of humor then. Cheers all. Sorry Specifico, just covering all the bases-
2543:
1977:
38:
2002:
3005:
641:
1444:
Thank you for the "thank you". The rampant bias on this site veiled by misguided use of "policy" is astounding.
986:
I appreciate your dedication to the thankless role of Admin at WP, and this seems like a promising initiative.
799:
was it that you were implying and please explain why you are confused that I would find it offensive? Thanks.
1772:
664:
162:
3098:
636:
Stop restoring the link to that blog please, it is a BLP vio, CMDC is a real person after all so BLP applies.
3350:
486:
Does her behavior make a mockery of ANI? I think it does. But if anyone is maligning the admins, it's Carol.
3211:
is a blanket source for the entire paragrah, for a lot of minor details like his areas of study at York, so
2937:
affiliation. I have no interest in sorting out whether you're misinformed or worse. This thread is closed.
2681:
2652:
2442:
SPECIFICO, please don't tell people you're in conflict with that you "hope they find peace with themselves".
2379:
1775:. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see
1151:
1108:
1072:
As you were involved in a previous discussion on this topic, I am notifying you of a new RFC on this topic.
2594:
2095:
2048:
2010:
1918:
1051:
836:
786:
723:
269:
220:
2626:
1021:
709:
Both allow reports regarding questionable or false accusations of bigotry in Knowledge (XXG) discussions.
2285:
I'm occupied over the next few days. However, I'll have this information to you by the end of the week.
2094:
greater length than his notability deserves! If you find this observation unhelpful, please forgive me.
1620:
1207:
1147:
1104:
762:
I consider it a Personal Attack for you to call MilesMoney my friend and you should strike that remark.
368:, at the bloodied hands of a callous, capricious, admin with many other murders to his name. (Though he
238:
112:
2567:
1406:
Also, I hope you finally get why I'm right. Gun control is about opposing (to some extent) gun rights i
457:
enforced. Alas, few of you are doing so and it says much for the admins that you malign here that they
2965:
3029:
2926:
2557:
2428:
2400:
2337:
2318:
2290:
2256:
1519:
1504:
1486:
1449:
1419:
1397:
1331:
1297:
1235:
1196:
1123:
741:
637:
606:
559:
542:
491:
441:
423:
378:
323:
290:
3216:
3372:
3305:
3278:
3262:
3244:
3223:
3191:
3172:
3147:
3120:
3104:
3087:
3070:
2972:
2945:
2804:
2766:
2728:
2578:
2511:
2473:
2354:
2275:
2234:
2191:
2112:
2082:
2034:
1939:
1838:
1737:
1686:
1638:
1604:
1572:
1471:
1352:
1316:
1279:
1253:
1219:
1170:
994:
975:
957:
937:
904:
866:
770:
657:
625:
514:
400:
308:
233:
this. And, as always, extra care should be taken when sourcing claims about living people. Thanks,
135:
47:
17:
1855:
3339:
3335:
3033:
2677:
2648:
2616:
2489:
2454:
2378:. The next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
2317:. The next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
2216:
2137:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at
1911:ā. I think the community is now more aware of this behavior than it was previously. Please stop.
1653:
1587:
1382:
1137:
1080:
389:
341:
178:
3233:
2547:
1497:
Knowledge (XXG):Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Talk:List_of_Asian_pornographic_actors
1763:. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the
1596:
Thanks. I hope you all get this under control so you can turn your energies to other pursuits.
300:
You GO, girl. No accident you are a daughter of Athena, goddess of knowledge and intelligence.
2831:
2787:
2749:
2709:
2590:
2178:
2066:
1914:
1797:
1719:
1047:
832:
782:
719:
349:
265:
215:
3298:
3138:
1392:
Well in that case, I deserve a apology too. I'll be waiting for one on my talk page, Mister!
596:
388:
You anthropologists are always one step ahead of the game, I'd say. Or, maybe it's just that
170:
2641:
2170:
1787:
1668:
1630:
misrepresentation, in my opinion. Happy New Year to you and Mrs. Bink and the Binklets.Ā :)
1616:
1073:
882:
691:), as well as in past talk page discussions which I should have reported to ANI previously.
466:
345:
234:
156:
108:
1955:
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at
1538:
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at
653:
476:
3066:. Feel free to raise concerns about future citations that are needed on the talk page. --
3025:
2922:
2553:
2424:
2396:
2333:
2286:
2252:
1515:
1500:
1482:
1445:
1415:
1393:
1327:
1293:
1231:
1192:
1119:
737:
602:
555:
538:
487:
437:
419:
374:
357:
353:
319:
286:
1043:
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
554:
So far, the extent of this mischief is that I refuse to be baited. Should I feel guilty?
193:
3405:
3365:
3302:
3271:
3259:
3237:
3220:
3184:
3165:
3161:
3140:
3113:
3101:
3080:
3067:
2969:
2938:
2797:
2759:
2721:
2574:
2504:
2466:
2347:
2268:
2227:
2184:
2105:
2075:
2027:
1932:
1908:
1833:
1730:
1679:
1631:
1597:
1565:
1464:
1345:
1309:
1272:
1246:
1212:
1163:
987:
970:
950:
932:
897:
859:
800:
763:
618:
507:
393:
301:
128:
2143:
Please add your evidence by February 8, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes.
192:
Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the appropriate
3159:
2911:
2879:
2819:
2612:
2485:
2450:
2212:
1649:
1583:
1378:
1133:
1076:
3410:
3377:
3353:
3308:
3283:
3265:
3249:
3226:
3196:
3177:
3152:
3125:
3107:
3092:
3073:
2975:
2950:
2930:
2881:
2835:
2809:
2791:
2771:
2753:
2733:
2713:
2685:
2656:
2620:
2516:
2492:
2478:
2457:
2446:
2432:
2404:
2359:
2341:
2294:
2280:
2260:
2239:
2220:
2196:
2161:
2117:
2098:
2087:
2051:
2039:
2013:
1985:
1944:
1924:
1844:
1791:
1742:
1723:
1691:
1672:
1657:
1643:
1624:
1609:
1591:
1577:
1523:
1508:
1490:
1476:
1453:
1423:
1401:
1386:
1357:
1335:
1321:
1301:
1284:
1258:
1239:
1224:
1200:
1175:
1155:
1141:
1127:
1112:
1084:
1059:
999:
981:
962:
943:
909:
886:
871:
840:
790:
775:
745:
729:
671:
645:
630:
610:
563:
546:
519:
495:
470:
445:
427:
405:
382:
327:
313:
294:
275:
242:
226:
140:
116:
3182:
3064:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics#SPECIFICO topic-banned
3015:
2919:
2827:
2783:
2745:
2705:
1715:
3297:
Molyneux, then The Corbett Report is a secondary source. I think you may need to
3163:
3157:
3136:
1038:
please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.
2704:
appears to be to track my every editĀ :( and make snide asides about me. Cheers.
3327:
3299:
read up on what constitutes the difference between primary and secondary sources
2744:
I made a comment about "friends"? If so, I meant no insult, for sure. Cheers.
2154:
1783:
1664:
1438:
878:
595:
Your posting of personal details about another editor, by linking the blogs, is
462:
361:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2370:
2309:
1903:
and after three more incidents in the following days was forced to take you to
1344:
should be read by every Wikipedian and applied to the our own activities here.
411:
340:
Today's cascade of notifications reminds me of a 90s slasher horror film like
1759:
concerning Austrian economics, to which you were listed as a party, has been
1663:
Specifico is a member, to try to force a shut down of drama board threads. -
2637:
There is an RfC in which your participation would be greatly appreciated:
2423:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ā
529:
Wait, did people seriously take offense at my above post? If I call admins
2019:
Andrew, "infantile" is not a metaphor. You know that. It's an adjective.
159:
BLP issues discussed at length on the talk page and now going to WP:BLPN.
3331:
3319:
2872:
537:(as opposed to supernatural serial killers) is this also offensive/a PA?
285:
It is pretty UGLY, but seeing your name next to it made it pretty. <3
185:
are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
3208:
262:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
534:
124:
3388:
2781:
on personalities, which annoys the heck out of some people <g: -->
2147:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics/Workshop
2139:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics/Evidence
1501:
Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
1483:
Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
1446:
Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
3395:
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
3361:
2695:
In my time n Knowledge (XXG), I have done my darndest not to hold
530:
2210:
Knowledge (XXG):What_SYNTH_is_not#SYNTH_is_not_mere_juxtaposition
1881:
User_talk:Carolmooredc/Archive_VIII#EW_on_Rothbard EW on Rothbard
678:
Israel-Palestine and Sexology arbitrations vs. false allegations
2826:, but lurkers are free to join in the exercise, to be sure.
2104:
can get on with our job of improving the article. Thank you.
756:
This was a little off topic for ANI, but I wanted address it:
410:
I strongly object to being called a zombie; I prefer the term
25:
1964:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests#Requests for arbitration
1547:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests#Requests for arbitration
617:
are not allowed to comment on this page, so no reply please.
3387:
2992:
Hello, SPECIFICO. Please check your email; you've got mail!
2985:
2550:. This sanction supersedes the existing community sanctions.
2528:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics
2135:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics
2127:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics
1957:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case#Austrian economics
2861:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics
2251:(speaking metaphorically) the equations on the blackboard.
1341:
1340:
Exactly right. In fact, the section of 4H's WP article on
461:
tend to overlook infractions unless they become serious. -
3046:
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
2894:
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
1870:
User_talk:Carolmooredc/Archive_VIII#Warning_--_Presley_AfD
1859:
all regarding libertarian or Austrian economics articles.
475:
There's a very good reason I'm commenting here and not on
2642:
Talk:Gun_control#RfC:_Remove_Nazi_gun_control_argument.3F
2006:: pages change, but talk pages are there for eternity.)
1893:
User_talk:Carolmooredc/Archive_IX#Warning_RE:_Murphy_talk
1875:
a separate Dec 30, 2013 warning regarding another article
373:
in a re-opened ANI), I don't see him being killed again.
3404:". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
3384:
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
3212:
2997:
2443:
2392:
2072:
1900:
1816:
336:
Mises Sanctions as a Horror movie plot: Anyone can die?
318:
Meh. I'd totally prefer being the goddess of spunk. :P
2145:
You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,
2691:
grudges are about the most useless thing in the world
2421:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1815:
Hi Specifico, I got the notification on my phone for
1074:
Talk:Gun_control#Authoritarianism_and_gun_control_RFC
260:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
2966:
I am notifying you of an ArbCom Enforcement request.
1907:
in a section named āDisruptive talk page notices by
711:
Please study them and cease your false allegations.
1887:
User_talk:Carolmooredc/Archive_IX#Please_use_WP:BRD
2865:all disruptive edits to articles within this topic
2796:I see. Thanks for the explanation. Makes sense.
2671:RfC: Replace existing Nazi gun control paragraphs?
2297:We instructors of sociology have it hard you know!
3232:The list of courses taken as an undergraduate is
2151:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Guide to arbitration
1540:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests#Gun Control
201:the topic of the existence of these sanctions.
3397:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard
2818:and the "evidence" on ,my evilness (shades of
2149:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see
1864:User_talk:Carolmooredc/Archive_VIII#Canvassing
2662:Notice of RfC 2 and request for participation
1090:Your use of German and Russian in Gun Control
344:. Anyone -- that means you and I, as well as
8:
151:Individual editor notice and logging in per
2633:Notice of RfC and request for participation
589:other editors. If you continue, you may be
153:Knowledge (XXG):General_sanctions#Community
3318:I noticed on your userpage that you enjoy
3293:When "The Corbett Report" posts something
3051:The following discussion has been closed.
3042:
2899:The following discussion has been closed.
2890:
1481:Heh, keep reading, now its laughable... --
929:and you are free to edit at your leisure.
2167:I am leaving this note to inform editors
831:Sincerely hoping this helps in some way,
3219:, which is fine. You should revert. --
2738:I did not assert that you did <g: -->
1850:Please be aware of possible Wikihounding
2916:Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
2047:I'll check the metaphor thing, though.
1901:June 23 I warned you about Wikihounding
2546:, broadly construed, are placed under
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3209:http://freedomainradio.com/About.aspx
1410:; Nazism was about depriving Jews of
7:
3330:I readily have access to ubiquitous
2996:
2914:. Also note he has published in the
2419:There is currently a discussion at
1856:Knowledge (XXG):Harass#Wikihounding
1010:Formal mediation has been requested
258:There is currently a discussion at
1777:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution
24:
2863:are underway, and evidence about
2153:. For the Arbitration Committee,
1970:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration guide
1553:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration guide
927:User:Adjwilley/Austrian_economics
2414:
2369:
2308:
1437:
580:
253:
123:
29:
3362:upscale joints such as this one
3338:, be sure to try some. Cheers,
3326:horchata, and as a resident of
3270:Don't post on this page again.
2822:). Naturally the addition was
2611:For the Arbitration Committee,
593:from editing Knowledge (XXG).
1749:Request for mediation rejected
858:Thanks again for stopping by.
208:This notice will be logged at
1:
2197:23:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
2003:The World and Knowledge (XXG)
1782:For the Mediation Committee,
1524:22:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
1509:21:09, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
1491:20:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
1477:19:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
1454:19:14, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
1424:07:25, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
1402:07:15, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
1387:22:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
1358:23:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
1336:23:01, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
1322:22:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
1302:21:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
1285:20:53, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
1259:19:26, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
1240:19:21, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
1225:19:18, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
1201:19:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
1176:19:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1156:17:59, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1142:17:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1128:17:47, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1113:17:09, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1085:16:32, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1060:18:47, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
795:Hector, please state exactly
695:Iād like you to be aware of
646:18:33, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
631:18:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
611:18:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
564:04:11, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
547:17:04, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
520:15:49, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
496:07:28, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
471:07:14, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
446:06:29, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
428:06:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
406:04:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
383:04:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
328:04:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
314:22:56, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
295:22:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
276:19:36, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
243:06:25, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
227:22:49, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
3001:at any time by removing the
2540:Austrian school of economics
2162:01:49, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
2118:00:08, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
2099:21:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
2088:20:59, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
2052:20:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
2040:13:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
2014:13:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
1986:19:26, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
1945:02:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
1925:02:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
1771:of the Committee, or to the
1757:request for formal mediation
1186:Ho, ho, doh! (WP:Competence)
1058:of the Mediation Committee.
1000:16:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
982:16:21, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
963:16:06, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
944:00:18, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
910:16:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
887:15:53, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
872:00:08, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
841:23:06, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
791:16:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
776:16:41, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
746:19:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
730:15:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
698:Israel-Palestine arbitration
672:00:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
165:, the community has enacted
141:21:36, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
122:Hi, Mark. Me too, thanks.
117:20:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
3134:Stuff I'm not banned from:
1845:06:46, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
1792:05:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
1743:23:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
1724:23:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
1692:22:58, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
1673:22:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
1658:22:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
1644:22:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
1625:22:24, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
1610:21:18, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
1592:20:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
1578:20:45, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
194:administrators' noticeboard
3426:
3402:fractional reserve banking
2980:
2824:just about at the deadline
2686:22:23, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
2657:14:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
2621:23:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
2544:Ludwig von Mises Institute
2405:05:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
2360:04:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
2342:03:58, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
2295:04:27, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
2281:22:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
2261:21:35, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
2203:synth revert on gary north
2961:Arb Enforcement requested
2517:11:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
2493:09:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
2479:00:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
2458:00:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
2433:19:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
2391:Specifically, this edit:
2240:16:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
2221:16:40, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
1804:the Mediation Committee.)
1034:guide to formal mediation
3411:08:43, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
3378:03:36, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
3354:23:26, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
3309:15:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
3284:20:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
3266:20:11, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
3250:19:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
3227:19:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
3054:Please do not modify it.
3034:14:59, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
2976:05:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
2951:23:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
2931:23:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
2902:Please do not modify it.
2882:14:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
2836:12:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
2740:. And might you tell me
1872:, Dec 28 which includes
3197:02:09, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
3178:01:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
3153:00:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
3126:23:55, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
3108:23:51, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
3093:21:37, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
3074:18:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
2810:23:43, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
2792:23:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
2772:23:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
2754:23:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
2734:22:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
2714:20:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
2548:discretionary sanctions
2380:Talk:Hans-Hermann Hoppe
1030:formal mediation policy
3392:
2990:
2869:the relevant case page
2387:without further notice
2326:without further notice
1765:mediation request page
752:The joys of friendship
360:, or even new Sheriff
3391:
2989:
2867:is being accepted at
2538:Pages related to the
2246:Quanitative economics
2071:Regarding this diff:
1978:A Quest For Knowledge
1495:Wow, unbelievable...
1208:personality pathology
1046:Message delivered by
42:of past discussions.
2855:arbitration evidence
2385:blocked from editing
2324:blocked from editing
2319:User talk:Srich32977
1342:covenant communities
704:Sexology arbitration
392:you were born with.
167:editing restrictions
163:community discussion
1408:n and of themselves
1018:Mediation Committee
18:User talk:SPECIFICO
3393:
2998:remove this notice
2991:
2438:Passive aggressive
1709:You definitely do
1269:Covenant Community
179:Austrian economics
103:Past notifications
3206:
3205:
2958:
2957:
2853:American politics
1931:fellow editors.
1923:
1899:Remember that on
1842:
1822:Graham's hiearchy
1805:
1459:
1458:
1430:A cookie for you!
1103:and harassment. -
1062:
979:
941:
728:
390:women's intuition
366:die at any moment
350:User:carolmooredc
274:
224:
161:As a result of a
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
3417:
3408:
3370:
3347:
3346:
3343:
3276:
3242:
3189:
3170:
3145:
3118:
3085:
3056:
3043:
3022:
3020:
3014:
3010:
3004:
3000:
2988:
2981:You've got mail!
2943:
2912:Mises.org/Caplan
2904:
2891:
2877:
2802:
2764:
2726:
2509:
2471:
2418:
2417:
2373:
2352:
2312:
2273:
2232:
2189:
2182:
2174:
2159:
2110:
2080:
2070:
2032:
1991:Response to ping
1937:
1912:
1843:
1836:
1795:
1735:
1684:
1636:
1602:
1570:
1469:
1441:
1434:
1433:
1350:
1314:
1277:
1251:
1217:
1168:
1045:
992:
980:
973:
955:
942:
935:
902:
864:
768:
717:
667:
623:
584:
583:
512:
414:. More seasonal.
398:
346:User:Binksternet
306:
281:Note on Barnstar
263:
257:
256:
249:FYI, ANI mention
218:
157:Thomas DiLorenzo
133:
127:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
3425:
3424:
3420:
3419:
3418:
3416:
3415:
3414:
3406:
3386:
3366:
3344:
3341:
3340:
3316:
3272:
3238:
3185:
3166:
3141:
3114:
3081:
3052:
3041:
3023:
3018:
3012:
3008:
3006:You've got mail
3002:
2994:
2986:
2983:
2963:
2939:
2910:Please look at
2900:
2889:
2873:
2857:
2798:
2760:
2722:
2693:
2664:
2635:
2532:
2505:
2467:
2447:Robert Browning
2440:
2415:
2412:
2367:
2348:
2306:
2269:
2248:
2228:
2205:
2185:
2176:
2168:
2155:
2131:
2106:
2076:
2064:
2028:
1993:
1953:
1933:
1852:
1831:
1813:
1808:
1807:
1780:
1751:
1731:
1680:
1632:
1598:
1566:
1536:
1465:
1432:
1374:
1346:
1310:
1273:
1247:
1213:
1188:
1164:
1092:
1070:
1068:gun control rfc
1065:
1064:
1041:
1012:
988:
968:
951:
930:
922:
898:
860:
764:
754:
680:
665:
638:Darkness Shines
619:
581:
578:
508:
394:
358:User:MilesMoney
354:User:Srich32977
338:
302:
283:
254:
251:
169:, described at
149:
129:
105:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3423:
3421:
3385:
3382:
3381:
3380:
3315:
3312:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3253:
3252:
3204:
3203:
3202:
3201:
3200:
3199:
3133:
3132:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3128:
3058:
3057:
3048:
3047:
3040:
3037:
2993:
2984:
2982:
2979:
2962:
2959:
2956:
2955:
2954:
2953:
2906:
2905:
2896:
2895:
2888:
2885:
2856:
2850:
2849:
2848:
2847:
2846:
2845:
2844:
2843:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2838:
2692:
2689:
2674:
2673:
2663:
2660:
2645:
2644:
2634:
2631:
2609:
2608:
2604:
2588:
2572:
2551:
2531:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2500:
2439:
2436:
2411:
2408:
2366:
2363:
2305:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2247:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2204:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2130:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2045:
2024:
2020:
1992:
1989:
1974:
1973:
1967:
1952:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1909:User:SPECIFICO
1897:
1896:
1895:, Jan 14, 2014
1890:
1889:, Jan 10, 2014
1884:
1883:, Dec 29, 2013
1878:
1877:
1876:
1867:
1866:, Dec 19, 2013
1851:
1848:
1812:
1809:
1796:(Delivered by
1794:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1750:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1646:
1557:
1556:
1550:
1535:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1493:
1457:
1456:
1442:
1431:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1404:
1373:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1324:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1130:
1091:
1088:
1069:
1066:
1044:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
921:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
856:
852:
848:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
801:User:SPECIFICO
778:
753:
750:
749:
748:
714:
713:
712:
679:
676:
675:
674:
634:
633:
587:stop attacking
577:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
552:
501:
500:
499:
498:
484:
480:
433:
432:
431:
430:
415:
337:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
282:
279:
250:
247:
246:
245:
213:
198:
197:
190:
186:
182:
160:
148:
147:WP:AEGS notice
145:
144:
143:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3422:
3413:
3412:
3409:
3403:
3398:
3390:
3383:
3379:
3376:
3375:
3371:
3369:
3363:
3358:
3357:
3356:
3355:
3352:
3348:
3337:
3333:
3329:
3325:
3321:
3313:
3311:
3310:
3307:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3285:
3282:
3281:
3277:
3275:
3269:
3268:
3267:
3264:
3261:
3257:
3256:
3255:
3254:
3251:
3248:
3247:
3243:
3241:
3235:
3231:
3230:
3229:
3228:
3225:
3222:
3218:
3214:
3210:
3198:
3195:
3194:
3190:
3188:
3183:
3181:
3180:
3179:
3176:
3175:
3171:
3169:
3164:
3162:
3160:
3158:
3156:
3155:
3154:
3151:
3150:
3146:
3144:
3139:
3137:
3135:
3127:
3124:
3123:
3119:
3117:
3111:
3110:
3109:
3106:
3103:
3099:
3096:
3095:
3094:
3091:
3090:
3086:
3084:
3078:
3077:
3076:
3075:
3072:
3069:
3065:
3060:
3059:
3055:
3050:
3049:
3045:
3044:
3038:
3036:
3035:
3031:
3027:
3017:
3007:
2999:
2978:
2977:
2974:
2971:
2967:
2960:
2952:
2949:
2948:
2944:
2942:
2935:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2928:
2924:
2920:
2917:
2913:
2908:
2907:
2903:
2898:
2897:
2893:
2892:
2886:
2884:
2883:
2880:
2878:
2876:
2870:
2866:
2862:
2854:
2851:
2837:
2833:
2829:
2825:
2821:
2820:Despicable Me
2817:
2813:
2812:
2811:
2808:
2807:
2803:
2801:
2795:
2794:
2793:
2789:
2785:
2780:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2770:
2769:
2765:
2763:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2732:
2731:
2727:
2725:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2711:
2707:
2703:
2702:raison d'ĆŖtre
2698:
2690:
2688:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2678:Lightbreather
2676:Thank you. --
2672:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2661:
2659:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2649:Lightbreather
2647:Thank you. --
2643:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2632:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2623:
2622:
2618:
2614:
2605:
2602:
2599:
2596:
2592:
2589:
2586:
2583:
2580:
2576:
2573:
2569:
2565:
2562:
2559:
2555:
2552:
2549:
2545:
2541:
2537:
2536:
2535:
2529:
2526:
2518:
2515:
2514:
2510:
2508:
2501:
2497:
2496:
2494:
2491:
2487:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2477:
2476:
2472:
2470:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2459:
2456:
2452:
2448:
2444:
2437:
2435:
2434:
2430:
2426:
2422:
2410:NOTICE of ANI
2409:
2407:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2394:
2393:
2388:
2386:
2382:, you may be
2381:
2377:
2374:This is your
2372:
2364:
2362:
2361:
2358:
2357:
2353:
2351:
2344:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2331:
2327:
2325:
2321:, you may be
2320:
2316:
2313:This is your
2311:
2303:
2296:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2279:
2278:
2274:
2272:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2258:
2254:
2245:
2241:
2238:
2237:
2233:
2231:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2211:
2202:
2198:
2195:
2194:
2190:
2188:
2180:
2172:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2128:
2125:
2119:
2116:
2115:
2111:
2109:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2097:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2086:
2085:
2081:
2079:
2073:
2068:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2050:
2046:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2038:
2037:
2033:
2031:
2025:
2021:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2012:
2007:
2005:
2004:
1997:
1990:
1988:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1971:
1968:
1965:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1958:
1951:Arbcom notice
1950:
1946:
1943:
1942:
1938:
1936:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1922:
1920:
1919:Talkie-Talkie
1916:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1894:
1891:
1888:
1885:
1882:
1879:
1874:
1873:
1871:
1868:
1865:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1857:
1849:
1847:
1846:
1840:
1835:
1828:
1823:
1818:
1810:
1806:
1803:
1799:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1748:
1744:
1741:
1740:
1736:
1734:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1712:
1693:
1690:
1689:
1685:
1683:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1645:
1642:
1641:
1637:
1635:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1601:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1571:
1569:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1554:
1551:
1548:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1541:
1533:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1475:
1474:
1470:
1468:
1461:
1460:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1440:
1436:
1435:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1371:
1359:
1356:
1355:
1351:
1349:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1323:
1320:
1319:
1315:
1313:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1278:
1276:
1270:
1260:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1250:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1216:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1185:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1167:
1162:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1148:Justanonymous
1145:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1105:Justanonymous
1102:
1101:hate speeches
1097:
1089:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1075:
1067:
1063:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1009:
1001:
998:
997:
993:
991:
985:
984:
983:
977:
972:
966:
965:
964:
961:
960:
956:
954:
948:
947:
946:
945:
939:
934:
928:
919:
911:
908:
907:
903:
901:
894:
891:Ah, but I do
890:
889:
888:
884:
880:
875:
874:
873:
870:
869:
865:
863:
857:
853:
849:
845:
844:
843:
842:
838:
834:
829:
826:
822:
818:
814:
811:
802:
798:
794:
793:
792:
788:
784:
779:
777:
774:
773:
769:
767:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
751:
747:
743:
739:
734:
733:
732:
731:
727:
725:
724:Talkie-Talkie
721:
710:
706:
705:
700:
699:
694:
693:
692:
690:
686:
677:
673:
670:
668:
661:
660:
655:
650:
649:
648:
647:
643:
639:
632:
629:
628:
624:
622:
615:
614:
613:
612:
608:
604:
600:
598:
592:
588:
576:November 2013
575:
565:
561:
557:
553:
550:
549:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
518:
517:
513:
511:
505:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
478:
474:
473:
472:
468:
464:
460:
455:
450:
449:
448:
447:
443:
439:
429:
425:
421:
416:
413:
409:
408:
407:
404:
403:
399:
397:
391:
387:
386:
385:
384:
380:
376:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
335:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
315:
312:
311:
307:
305:
299:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
280:
278:
277:
273:
271:
270:Talkie-Talkie
267:
261:
248:
244:
240:
236:
231:
230:
229:
228:
225:
222:
221:Talkie-Talkie
217:
211:
206:
202:
195:
191:
187:
183:
180:
176:
175:
174:
173:and below.
172:
168:
164:
158:
154:
146:
142:
139:
138:
134:
132:
126:
121:
120:
119:
118:
114:
110:
102:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3394:
3373:
3367:
3336:coastal bend
3323:
3317:
3294:
3292:
3279:
3273:
3245:
3239:
3207:
3192:
3186:
3173:
3167:
3148:
3142:
3121:
3115:
3088:
3082:
3061:
3053:
3024:
2964:
2946:
2940:
2909:
2901:
2874:
2864:
2858:
2852:
2823:
2805:
2799:
2778:
2767:
2761:
2741:
2729:
2723:
2701:
2696:
2694:
2675:
2665:
2646:
2636:
2627:Discuss this
2625:
2624:
2610:
2597:
2591:Carolmooredc
2581:
2568:topic-banned
2560:
2533:
2512:
2506:
2474:
2468:
2441:
2413:
2390:
2383:
2376:last warning
2375:
2368:
2355:
2349:
2345:
2329:
2322:
2315:last warning
2314:
2307:
2276:
2270:
2249:
2235:
2229:
2206:
2192:
2186:
2179:Lawrencekhoo
2156:
2142:
2132:
2113:
2107:
2096:Andrew Dalby
2083:
2077:
2067:Andrew Dalby
2063:
2049:Andrew Dalby
2035:
2029:
2011:Andrew Dalby
2008:
2001:
1998:
1994:
1975:
1954:
1940:
1934:
1915:Carolmooredc
1913:
1898:
1853:
1826:
1814:
1802:on behalf of
1798:MediationBot
1781:
1773:mailing list
1738:
1732:
1710:
1708:
1687:
1681:
1639:
1633:
1605:
1599:
1573:
1567:
1558:
1537:
1472:
1466:
1411:
1407:
1375:
1353:
1347:
1317:
1311:
1280:
1274:
1268:
1267:
1254:
1248:
1220:
1214:
1189:
1171:
1165:
1160:
1100:
1096:hate speech,
1095:
1093:
1071:
1048:MediationBot
1042:
1037:
1026:request page
995:
989:
958:
952:
923:
905:
899:
892:
867:
861:
833:HectorMoffet
830:
827:
823:
819:
815:
812:
809:
796:
783:HectorMoffet
771:
765:
755:
720:Carolmooredc
718:
715:
708:
702:
696:
681:
662:
658:
635:
626:
620:
594:
579:
515:
509:
503:
502:
458:
453:
434:
412:white walker
401:
395:
369:
365:
339:
309:
303:
284:
266:Carolmooredc
264:
252:
216:Carolmooredc
214:
207:
203:
199:
150:
136:
130:
106:
75:
43:
37:
3328:South Texas
2171:Stalwart111
1905:WP:ANI here
1617:Binksternet
810:Hey Spec,
483:ANI report.
362:User:Sitush
235:Mark Arsten
189:guidelines.
109:Mark Arsten
36:This is an
3217:WP:SELFPUB
3026:Nikkimaria
2782:. Cheers.
2554:Steeletrap
2365:March 2014
2304:March 2014
2287:Steeletrap
2253:Steeletrap
1516:MilesMoney
1416:Steeletrap
1412:all rights
1394:Steeletrap
1328:Steeletrap
1294:MilesMoney
1232:Steeletrap
1193:Steeletrap
1032:, and the
920:Invitation
738:MilesMoney
556:MilesMoney
539:Steeletrap
488:MilesMoney
438:MilesMoney
420:MilesMoney
375:Steeletrap
320:Steeletrap
287:Steeletrap
155:regarding
95:ArchiveĀ 10
3407:EarwigBot
3368:SPECIFICO
3332:taquerias
3303:Netoholic
3274:SPECIFICO
3260:Netoholic
3240:SPECIFICO
3221:Netoholic
3213:this edit
3187:SPECIFICO
3168:SPECIFICO
3143:SPECIFICO
3116:SPECIFICO
3102:Netoholic
3083:SPECIFICO
3068:Netoholic
3021:template.
2970:Netoholic
2941:SPECIFICO
2800:SPECIFICO
2762:SPECIFICO
2724:SPECIFICO
2575:SPECIFICO
2507:SPECIFICO
2469:SPECIFICO
2350:SPECIFICO
2271:SPECIFICO
2230:SPECIFICO
2187:SPECIFICO
2108:SPECIFICO
2078:SPECIFICO
2030:SPECIFICO
1935:SPECIFICO
1834:Adjwilley
1733:SPECIFICO
1682:SPECIFICO
1634:SPECIFICO
1600:SPECIFICO
1568:SPECIFICO
1467:SPECIFICO
1348:SPECIFICO
1312:SPECIFICO
1275:SPECIFICO
1249:SPECIFICO
1215:SPECIFICO
1166:SPECIFICO
1022:Mediation
990:SPECIFICO
971:Adjwilley
953:SPECIFICO
933:Adjwilley
900:SPECIFICO
862:SPECIFICO
766:SPECIFICO
621:SPECIFICO
510:SPECIFICO
396:SPECIFICO
304:SPECIFICO
131:SPECIFICO
87:ArchiveĀ 6
82:ArchiveĀ 5
76:ArchiveĀ 4
70:ArchiveĀ 3
65:ArchiveĀ 2
60:ArchiveĀ 1
3320:horchata
3314:Horchata
3234:WP:UNDUE
3039:Molyneux
2613:Rockfang
2607:content.
2601:contribs
2585:contribs
2564:contribs
2542:and the
2486:Bishonen
2451:Bishonen
2213:Gaijin42
1976:Thanks,
1769:Chairman
1761:declined
1650:Gaijin42
1584:Gaijin42
1559:Thanks,
1379:Gaijin42
1161:DziÄkujÄ
1134:Gaijin42
1077:Gaijin42
967:Thanks!
781:implied.
3345:Shandy`
2923:S. Rich
2921:). ā
2828:Collect
2784:Collect
2746:Collect
2706:Collect
2425:S. Rich
2397:S. Rich
2334:S. Rich
1716:Collect
1372:apology
1120:S. Rich
603:S. Rich
597:WP:TPNO
591:blocked
585:Please
535:dragons
370:totally
210:WP:AEGS
171:WP:AEGS
39:archive
2887:Caplan
2530:closed
2157:Ks0stm
2129:opened
1784:Sunray
1665:Sitush
1534:arbcom
1056:behalf
1028:, the
879:Sitush
654:WP:GAB
477:WP:ANI
463:Sitush
364:could
342:Scream
3295:about
2779:never
2742:where
2571:case.
2566:) is
1811:Reply
1054:) on
531:elves
504:Miles
16:<
3374:talk
3351:talk
3342:John
3324:love
3322:. I
3301:. --
3280:talk
3246:talk
3193:talk
3174:talk
3149:talk
3122:talk
3089:talk
3030:talk
2947:talk
2927:talk
2832:talk
2806:talk
2788:talk
2768:talk
2750:talk
2730:talk
2710:talk
2682:talk
2653:talk
2617:talk
2595:talk
2579:talk
2558:talk
2513:talk
2490:talk
2475:talk
2455:talk
2429:talk
2401:talk
2356:talk
2338:talk
2291:talk
2277:talk
2257:talk
2236:talk
2217:talk
2193:talk
2175:and
2114:talk
2084:talk
2036:talk
1982:talk
1941:talk
1854:Per
1839:talk
1817:this
1788:talk
1755:The
1739:talk
1720:talk
1688:talk
1669:talk
1654:talk
1640:talk
1621:talk
1606:talk
1588:talk
1574:talk
1520:talk
1505:talk
1487:talk
1473:talk
1450:talk
1420:talk
1398:talk
1383:talk
1354:talk
1332:talk
1318:talk
1298:talk
1281:talk
1255:talk
1236:talk
1221:talk
1197:talk
1172:talk
1152:talk
1138:talk
1124:talk
1109:talk
1081:talk
1052:talk
1016:The
996:talk
976:talk
959:talk
938:talk
906:talk
883:talk
868:talk
837:talk
797:what
787:talk
772:talk
742:talk
701:and
689:here
687:and
685:here
666:Talk
642:talk
627:talk
607:talk
560:talk
543:talk
516:talk
492:talk
467:talk
442:talk
424:talk
402:talk
379:talk
324:talk
310:talk
291:talk
239:talk
137:talk
113:talk
3364:.
3016:ygm
3011:or
2875:AGK
2815:.
2697:any
1711:not
893:not
707:.
533:or
454:you
212:.
3349:ā¢
3032:)
3019:}}
3013:{{
3009:}}
3003:{{
2968:--
2929:)
2834:)
2790:)
2752:)
2712:)
2684:)
2655:)
2619:)
2495:.
2488:|
2460:.
2453:|
2449:?
2431:)
2403:)
2395:ā
2389:.
2340:)
2332:ā
2328:.
2293:)
2259:)
2219:)
2141:.
1984:)
1800:,
1790:)
1779:.
1722:)
1714:.
1671:)
1656:)
1623:)
1590:)
1522:)
1507:)
1499:--
1489:)
1452:)
1422:)
1400:)
1385:)
1334:)
1300:)
1238:)
1199:)
1154:)
1140:)
1126:)
1111:)
1083:)
1036:,
885:)
839:)
789:)
744:)
659:NW
656:.
644:)
609:)
601:ā
562:)
545:)
494:)
469:)
459:do
444:)
426:)
381:)
356:,
352:,
348:,
326:)
293:)
241:)
115:)
91:ā
3400:"
3306:@
3263:@
3224:@
3105:@
3071:@
3028:(
2973:@
2925:(
2918:(
2830:(
2786:(
2748:(
2708:(
2680:(
2651:(
2615:(
2598:Ā·
2593:(
2582:Ā·
2577:(
2561:Ā·
2556:(
2427:(
2399:(
2336:(
2289:(
2255:(
2215:(
2181::
2177:@
2173::
2169:@
2069::
2065:@
1980:(
1972:.
1966:;
1921:)
1917:(
1841:)
1837:(
1832:~
1786:(
1718:(
1667:(
1652:(
1619:(
1586:(
1555:.
1549:;
1518:(
1503:(
1485:(
1448:(
1418:(
1396:(
1381:(
1330:(
1296:(
1234:(
1195:(
1150:(
1136:(
1122:(
1107:(
1079:(
1050:(
978:)
974:(
969:~
940:)
936:(
931:~
881:(
835:(
785:(
740:(
726:)
722:(
683:(
669:)
663:(
640:(
605:(
599:.
558:(
541:(
490:(
465:(
440:(
422:(
377:(
322:(
289:(
272:)
268:(
237:(
223:)
219:(
196:.
111:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
