266:"injured party" behind that computer screen of his, I'm not going to communicate with him ever again. I really don't take this personal. If you don't like my matter-of-fact statements about the treachery displayed by others, but would like to prosecute my own impropriety of "political correctness", I do not care. You basically revealed that what bothered you the most, is the criticism of inappropriate behaviour. That comment I made to him, therefore now applies to you. This is not emotional for me, but you did in fact, "walk in" to that situation, not wanting to deal with the drama and think it will just go away, apparently taking this personally. You were already thinking that the disciplinary function of a block might have been too much. Well, isn't that the truth? I still don't request a lift of the block. If you don't like my attitude, you can go ahead and make it an indefinite block. There's really no difference and I have nothing to lose, with an Administration that does not take its own responsibilities seriously enough. I have read the guidelines and it is rare that they are enforced for all parties in an editorial dispute. No harm done, no feelings hurt. Well now, who cares about Knowledge anyways?
112:. I've already pointed out on Henry Stuart's talkpage, your other violations of Knowledge policy, but because of the controversial sensitivity of this sexuality topic, the Knowledge administration will go to great lengths to quiet legitimate complaint at your outrageousness. It is the politically correct thing to do. Like I said, exploit the loopholes and blind eyes of Knowledge. Run it into the ground. Who does it hurt? You've been hurt, you are convinced, by the Church and others unsympathetic to your issues. You may be a lapsed Catholic or have found Catholic support groups for your issue. The more you go about trying to "tell the REAL truth" about people such as Henry Stuart, or systematic problems about sexuality stereotypes, related to how really common it is, vis a vis, the conventional disavowal of your sexual orientation from the mainstream, the more you are engaging in pushing POV. Maybe you think that forcing the issue is the right thing, but it certainly is not the wisest approach. This coup d'medie or whatever, will only earn you more grief. I don't want the grief in your co-opting of legitimate, good faith projects such as free academia, to ruin it for others or myself, who may not expect your
117:
with what you may and I will not be the one around on
Judgment Day. Maybe you do not believe in this reciprocal freedom for others, even though you demand that others not place a "window into men's souls" or express criticism over your actions which negatively affect others. Like I said, it's your problem and like Pontius Pilate, I wash my hands of this issue. Good luck in making choices, because you have Free Will to do goodness or sin. Thanks for trying to "snipe" me out of the picture. It's worked and now you may defecate all over Henry Stuart, to displace your self-esteem problems, trying to normalise it through pretending everybody else is deviant as well, thus taking the heat off. You are still trying to make it seem that the ones most strident in condemnation of perversion, are closet perverts. You are a self-opinionated hypocrite. Don't worry. I'm not interested in coming by you again. You're just a "tattle-tale" if it's too hard for you to admit it. 'Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.' When did you forget that axiom? That's all I have to say.
103:
Stuart or his religion; I simply have an insight from a heavy study in the
Stuarts and the RCC. There are several claims which may be made about that dynasty and that Church, but what you are aiming at has nothing to do with them. It is almost as if some people who look at the data about historical topics, do not really have an affinity for the information and the true implications or importance of the details, nor the greater picture. I consider it to be extremely irresponsible to do what you have been doing and will continue to do. It is furthermore a problem of enabling this, that any frustration I show towards you, makes it seem that what you're doing is nothing and that I really have nothing legitimate to say. You may feel free to exploit this prejudice and continue your propagandisation about sexuality in the historical realm. Have a great time! Who's to take devil's advocate apologetics for the cause of truth seriously?
68:
level. I suspect you may be a
Catholic and have strong feelings on the issue. I have never sought to attack the Catholic church or clergyman per se, and you may want to note that personally I am actually a Roman Catholic by birth. Nor am I seeking to show hypocrisy (although there is doubtless loads of it) of clergymen. I am simply trying to make sure that the truth is reflected as far as possible - that may cause discomfort but we have to live with that.
403:
160:
362:
314:
28:
520:
The block was not for supporting Hitler. The block was for using the term heil heitler against another editor, in a way that supports incivility and was essentially meant as a personal attack, merely a week after being blocked for the same thing. Take a look at the context of his sentence and it will
67:
Thanks for your most recent posting on the discussion page of this article. I am now afraid I am going to have to report you for using consistently abusive language personally directed to me. You called me "diseased". I would rather engage constructively on the arguments and not attacks at a personal
102:
and his crowd. To present to you a personal statement about myself, in all fairness to your own willingness to reveal about yourself: I only look for fairness and conventional truth to be presented about religious and political figures in general. I'm not personally interested or invested in Henry
116:
to serve your selfish purposes. Others will resent you for doing what you do, knowingly and this con-artist, charlatanry will simply destroy the credibiliy of anything you push for. Be the professional POV-pusher, or not. Get away with it because you can, or not. It's your soul (and body) to do
107:
clearly desires to quietly disown Henry Stuart from the true ranks of
Catholicism, because the prospect of scandal hurts his confidence or self-perception, based upon your favoured accusations. To CarlosPn, it is better to turn the other cheek when it comes to these things, maybe go out of his way
97:
You might wish to change your editing associates on the
Knowledge, for it seems you've made an alliance with sexually-motivated editors who have nothing else to add to articles, but put anti-"mainstream", revisionist spin on historical possibilities/plausibilities/probabilities and totally bloat
265:
Like I said, there is nothing more to talk about with him. Even if he writes another faux self-composed, condescending and insolent reply, with a "shit-eating grin" about my situation and the fact that he is now free to do what he wants, sans-scrutiny from the
Knowledge Administration, as the
424:
Your "heil hitler" remark was completely out of line, especially given your recent block last week for personal attacks. You were warned, and you continued your attacks, therefore you are blocked for two weeks. If you even think of toeing the line again, the next block will be
108:
to seem agreeable for the old idea that "cut the root to save the tree" will remedy your blatant misappropriation of the media, such as
Knowledge or otherwise, as free for hate-mongering, propaganda-dispensing software. That's called
98:
minor, unsubstantiated claims of sexual behaviour or inclinations, beyond reason. So please, if you are serious about being taken at your word, broaden your edits to contribute on other than POV-pushing topics and avoid those such as
246:. Doesn't matter if you're "right" or "wrong," please comment on content and sources, not on editors. If you carry on making personal attacks after the block is done, the next block will be longer.
82:
You may now want to note that I have posted a complaint on the
Administrator's noticeboard asking them to investigate what I see as an unprovoked homophobic attack.
476:, others probably wouldn't take it as an offense or at least not incurred this long block just for saying "heil Hitler". For parallel, many users, such as
468:
I randomly came across this block on AN/I. I'm not sure this lengthy block is appropriate. For example, if he said something such as "Long live,
317:
Welcome to
Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
497:
436:
188:
322:
419:
410:
382:
176:
167:
338:
318:
493:
473:
330:
428:
370:
334:
184:
50:
38:
527:
449:
87:
73:
209:
I'm not requesting a removal of the block. Thanks for the wonderful "benefit of the doubt" offer.
374:
293:
251:
233:
200:
149:
267:
210:
118:
508:
389:
46:
45:
for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
42:
346:
522:
489:
480:, have blatant political statements on their userspace promoting brutal dictators such as
477:
444:
402:
326:
159:
83:
69:
289:
247:
229:
196:
145:
109:
58:
485:
137:
113:
104:
537:
481:
469:
459:
285:
337:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
342:
99:
361:
341:, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
54:
435:
after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may
33:
369:
you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to
313:
27:
541:
515:
501:
463:
396:
350:
297:
275:
255:
237:
218:
204:
153:
126:
91:
77:
62:
288:. If you do it again, the next block will be much longer. Cheers,
144:
to do anything like this again, I will unblock you straight off.
41:
has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
507:
Scroll up, he was blocked only weeks ago for the same thing.
401:
158:
133:
187:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
242:I'll let pass what you said to Contaldo80, above,
183:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
228:I meant it though and still do. All the best,
8:
492:. This seems a bit of a double-standard.--
140:if you have any questions. If you promise
138:Knowledge's policy about personal attacks
521:be perfectly clear why he was blocked.
329:, is not consistent with our policy of
7:
244:You are a self-opinionated hypocrite
427:. Please stop. You are welcome to
14:
360:
312:
181:making a blatant personal attack
132:I have blocked you 31 hours for
49:. You may also wish to read the
26:
286:Personal attacks aren't allowed
185:make constructive contributions
1:
511:weburiedoursecretsinthegarden
439:by adding the text {{unblock|
414:from editing for a period of
392:weburiedoursecretsinthegarden
387:Nazi references are a big no.
191:by adding the text {{unblock|
171:from editing for a period of
134:this blatant personal attack
542:10:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
516:10:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
502:10:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
464:10:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
420:Knowledge's blocking policy
397:10:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
351:23:11, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
298:01:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
276:23:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
256:22:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
238:22:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
219:22:35, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
205:16:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
177:Knowledge's blocking policy
154:16:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
127:22:35, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
92:16:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
78:16:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
560:
63:10:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
31:Welcome to Knowledge. The
339:Knowledge:Citing sources
271:
214:
122:
51:introduction to editing
406:
371:Talk:Holy Roman Empire
163:
405:
377:Knowledge again, you
333:. Take a look at the
162:
114:ownership of articles
39:Henry Benedict Stuart
22:Henry Benedict Stuart
474:Vive le Québec libre
418:in accordance with
175:in accordance with
437:contest this block
407:
164:
539:
494:Certified.Gangsta
461:
356:Holy Roman Empire
189:contest the block
551:
538:
535:
534:
531:
525:
513:
460:
457:
456:
453:
447:
441:your reason here
394:
364:
325:, as you did to
316:
193:your reason here
36:
30:
559:
558:
554:
553:
552:
550:
549:
548:
532:
529:
528:
523:
509:
490:Chiang Kai-shek
478:User:Blueshirts
466:
454:
451:
450:
445:
390:
385:from editing.
358:
327:New South Wales
323:reliable source
310:
308:New South Wales
207:
32:
24:
19:
12:
11:
5:
557:
555:
547:
546:
545:
544:
408:You have been
400:
357:
354:
309:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
240:
165:You have been
157:
130:
129:
110:cybersquatting
23:
20:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
556:
543:
540:
536:
526:
519:
518:
517:
514:
512:
506:
505:
504:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
486:Joseph Stalin
483:
479:
475:
471:
465:
462:
458:
448:
442:
438:
434:
433:contributions
432:
426:
421:
417:
413:
412:
404:
399:
398:
395:
393:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
355:
353:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:verifiability
328:
324:
320:
315:
307:
299:
295:
291:
287:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
239:
235:
231:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
169:
161:
156:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
136:. Please see
135:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
105:User:CarlosPn
101:
96:
95:
94:
93:
89:
85:
80:
79:
75:
71:
65:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
35:
29:
21:
16:
510:
482:Chairman Mao
470:Chairman Mao
467:
440:
430:
423:
415:
409:
391:
386:
378:
367:last warning
366:
365:This is the
359:
335:welcome page
311:
264:
243:
208:
192:
180:
172:
166:
141:
131:
81:
66:
47:edit summary
37:you made to
25:
100:User:Haiduc
53:. Thanks.
34:recent edit
17:August 2008
443:}} below.
425:permanent.
195:}} below.
84:Contaldo80
70:Contaldo80
375:vandalize
373:. If you
290:Gwen Gale
248:Gwen Gale
230:Gwen Gale
197:Gwen Gale
146:Gwen Gale
173:31 hours
416:2 weeks
411:blocked
383:blocked
268:Sceptik
211:Sceptik
168:blocked
119:Sceptik
43:sandbox
533:Jester
488:, and
472:!" or
455:Jester
431:useful
343:Bidgee
319:citing
429:make
142:never
530:SWAT
498:talk
452:SWAT
422:for
379:will
347:talk
294:talk
272:talk
252:talk
234:talk
215:talk
201:talk
179:for
150:talk
123:talk
88:talk
74:talk
59:talk
55:Rror
381:be
500:)
484:,
349:)
321:a
296:)
274:)
254:)
236:)
217:)
203:)
152:)
125:)
90:)
76:)
61:)
524:⇒
496:(
446:⇒
345:(
292:(
270:(
250:(
232:(
213:(
199:(
148:(
121:(
86:(
72:(
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
