Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:SchutteGod

Source 📝

475:
sourced by a variety of Knowledge (XXG) articles, including the article on the United Stars and the article on List of Countries by Population. The source for the estimate is the official US population clock. So honestly, fuck you for lauding a false allegation against me. There's count one. Count two, you don't dictate what is relevant, period. People can decide for themselves what is relevant and what is not. You said that me quoting that number and pointing out that only 39.1% of the US populace decided the elections is incorrect because that number includes children. Well so what? Are you suggesting that over 60% of the US population is made up of persons under the age of 18? That's not true, the 60% I was pointing out, the majority that had no say in the elections are not made up mostly of children. Otherwise that would leave the adult population at about 40%, which is absurd. Grow up, your editorial style sucks.
367: 424: 124: 678: 590: 261: 474:
So you removed a statistic I placed in the 2012 US Presidential Election article, you called my edit 'irrelevant' and 'original research'. It's neither. The information I provided is not original research, the 314,756,000 number I gave as an estimate for the US population does not come from me. It is
394:
I've started a discussion about the changes on the talk page. I think I understand where you're coming from, and looking back, you were right that there was too much weight on certain points. I don't think all of the information warranted removal and explained why on the talk page. I'd appreciate
183:
Also on the side: Some felt the need to include Powell's "remark/quote" about Palin which was rightfully rejected. I was part of it; Where you? I don't know and I don't feel like searching for it but assuming your point of view I guess it was in your spirit. The point? It could be a lot "worse" but
38:
The 2010 mid-term elections was a remarkable event in the history of the Republican party, and politics in general. To not record that is to ignore a bright spot in it's history. It was factual, and pertaining to the "history" part of the article. With the democrats control of the majority of the
450:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
135:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
87:
I have no idea what your prejudice against the word "female" might be - because yuo have not bothered to explain or discuss it. Please feel free to begin a discussion on the talk page of the list to see if there is support for moving the page.
174:
to confirm your claim I'll gladly retract any further action regarding this matter, (reverting myself again and leaving your edit as it stands now). Besides that, I would like to point out that bringing up "notability" in different edit
180:
the most notable Republican political figure on the conservative side. As for Frum, if you would like to leave him out I don't have strong feelings about it, yet, I'm not the only editor and you have to "fight" this with whoever pops
454:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
723: 633: 97:
SchutteGod is disruptive and silly. The word “female” is a completely acceptable adjective. The word “woman” makes a better noun. For example: first female president, or, first woman to serve as president etc.
565:
article page. Another user wanted to challenge and contradict his historical first. However, you were able to point that out and dispute that person's claim. Thank you once again for your contribution.
707:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 617:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 447: 39:
legislative seats in the past 100 years, it stands out with historic proportion. Perhaps keeping the number of gained seats in this election and the last time it's occurred can be a compromise.
692: 603: 388: 209:
Believe it or not SchutteGod, many universities, including Princeton, give A.B. degrees. Sometimes it helps to do a tad bit of research before impulsively reverting. Check out
67: 32: 16:
Welcome to my talk page. Just leave your comments with my underlings, who will with some cajoling, pass them along to me, or at least give me the gist of it.
436: 340: 163:. If you still fell strongly about this you might want to consider to bring it up at the talk page, revealing sources that confirm your last edit 189: 380: 746: 656: 538: 508: 571: 344: 185: 522: 742: 652: 716: 626: 153: 332: 272: 250: 137: 132: 567: 373: 366: 336: 440: 143: 728: 638: 431: 415: 70:, it is first appropriate to gain consensus on the article's talk page instead of just going for it like you did. 148:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a 704: 614: 510: 499: 460: 50: 348: 149: 549: 128: 480: 476: 402: 240: 89: 686: 597: 324: 313: 301: 229: 106: 700: 610: 178:(in about the same time frame) makes me wonder why you blanked Collin Powell as he is pretty sure 503: 456: 218: 184:
it's in the spirit and guidelines of WP and will be again after my edit. Cheer up; Don't mourn.--
356: 309: 712: 622: 735: 645: 542: 170:
and seems to be based only on your personal opinion about conservatism). If you can provide
77: 44: 715:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 708: 625:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 618: 290: 160: 396: 236: 17: 171: 167: 562: 289:
While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be
268: 254: 210: 102: 123: 281: 214: 260: 533: 352: 677: 589: 116: 72: 40: 319:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
750: 719:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
660: 629:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
575: 556: 516: 484: 464: 408: 360: 244: 222: 193: 110: 92: 82: 54: 25: 696:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
607:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
448:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Ryan Pierce (The West Wing)
732:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 642:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 722:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
690:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
632:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
601:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
383:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
365: 259: 537:, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a 435:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
280:
Unremarkable person known solely for a few appearances on
703:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
613:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
496: 429:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
176: 164: 66:
Before making significant page moves like you did with
389:
United States Virgin Islands Republican caucuses, 2012
296:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
541:
for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-
68:
List of female state governors in the United States
561:Hi, I wanted to thank you for contributing to the 379:Message added 15:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC). You can 343:can result in deletion without discussion, and 372:Hello, SchutteGod. You have new messages at 235:Why did you change the title of my article?-- 33:History of the United States Republican Party 8: 584: 437:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 127:You currently appear to be engaged in an 308:notice, but please explain why in your 166:(that I'm about to revert since it is 7: 687:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 598:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 152:among editors. If necessary, pursue 705:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 671:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 615:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 581:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 291:deleted for any of several reasons 275:because of the following concern: 204:what the heck is an "A.B." degree? 14: 446:The article will be discussed at 676: 588: 422: 122: 101:Please knock it off SchutteGod. 726:and submit your choices on the 636:and submit your choices on the 395:your thoughts on it. Thanks! 523:Category:Wikipedians who like 465:21:42, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 1: 751:00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 661:00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 557:05:51, 16 December 2017 (UTC) 485:04:04, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 374:Template talk:Same-sex unions 194:01:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 159:Remember you're already past 55:00:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 576:08:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 531:Hey! Based on your edits to 361:03:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 186:The Magnificent Clean-keeper 517:13:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC) 432:Ryan Pierce (The West Wing) 416:Ryan Pierce (The West Wing) 347:allows discussion to reach 111:07:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 93:17:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 83:17:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 26:18:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 769: 743:MediaWiki message delivery 653:MediaWiki message delivery 409:16:34, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 223:20:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 333:proposed deletion process 245:22:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 740:to your user talk page. 650:to your user talk page. 568:Welcometothenewmillenium 495:Seems we gots ourselves 439:or whether it should be 21: 341:speedy deletion process 314:the article's talk page 370: 264: 701:Arbitration Committee 684:Hello! Voting in the 611:Arbitration Committee 595:Hello! Voting in the 369: 345:articles for deletion 273:proposed for deletion 263: 539:series of userboxes 470:Attacking me is fun 230:History of Fox News 211:Princeton's website 140:. If you continue, 717:arbitration policy 627:arbitration policy 381:remove this notice 371: 337:deletion processes 265: 154:dispute resolution 753: 668: 667: 663: 251:Proposed deletion 138:three-revert rule 133:three-revert rule 760: 741: 739: 680: 651: 649: 592: 585: 555: 552: 545: 513: 506: 491:Sorry about that 426: 425: 405: 384: 330: 329: 323: 307: 306: 300: 131:. Note that the 126: 75: 58: 768: 767: 763: 762: 761: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 733: 681: 673: 643: 583: 550: 547: 543: 529: 511: 504: 500:over at Comcast 493: 472: 427: 423: 420: 403: 392: 385: 378: 327: 321: 320: 304: 298: 297: 258: 233: 201: 120: 90:KillerChihuahua 73: 64: 48: 36: 12: 11: 5: 766: 764: 724:the candidates 693:eligible users 682: 675: 674: 672: 669: 666: 665: 634:the candidates 604:eligible users 593: 582: 579: 563:Pete Buttigieg 528: 520: 492: 489: 471: 468: 421: 419: 414:Nomination of 412: 391: 386: 377: 364: 351:for deletion. 331:will stop the 287: 286: 269:Robert Marcato 257: 255:Robert Marcato 248: 232: 227: 226: 225: 200: 199:Michelle Obama 197: 119: 114: 63: 60: 53:comment added 35: 29: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 765: 754: 752: 748: 744: 737: 731: 730: 725: 720: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 697: 695: 694: 689: 688: 679: 670: 664: 662: 658: 654: 647: 641: 640: 635: 630: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 606: 605: 600: 599: 594: 591: 587: 586: 580: 578: 577: 573: 569: 564: 559: 558: 553: 546: 544:🐦Do☭torWho42 540: 536: 535: 527: 526: 521: 519: 518: 515: 514: 509: 507: 501: 498: 490: 488: 486: 482: 478: 469: 467: 466: 462: 458: 457:Go Phightins! 452: 449: 444: 442: 438: 434: 433: 417: 413: 411: 410: 406: 400: 399: 390: 387: 382: 375: 368: 363: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 326: 317: 315: 311: 303: 294: 292: 285: 283: 282:The Osbournes 278: 277: 276: 274: 270: 262: 256: 252: 249: 247: 246: 242: 238: 231: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 207: 206: 205: 198: 196: 195: 191: 187: 182: 177: 173: 169: 165: 162: 157: 155: 151: 147: 145: 139: 134: 130: 125: 118: 115: 113: 112: 108: 104: 99: 95: 94: 91: 85: 84: 81: 80: 79: 76: 69: 61: 59: 56: 52: 46: 42: 34: 30: 28: 27: 23: 19: 727: 721: 698: 691: 685: 683: 637: 631: 608: 602: 596: 560: 534:NationStates 532: 530: 525:NationStates 524: 502: 494: 473: 453: 445: 430: 428: 418:for deletion 397: 393: 339:exist. The 335:, but other 318: 310:edit summary 295: 288: 279: 267:The article 266: 234: 203: 202: 179: 158: 146:from editing 141: 121: 100: 96: 86: 78: 71: 65: 37: 31:My Edit To: 15: 729:voting page 639:voting page 487:DarkApollo 142:you may be 117:Sarah Palin 49:—Preceding 713:topic bans 623:topic bans 477:DarkApollo 398:Ravensfire 325:dated prod 302:dated prod 237:Jerzeykydd 62:Page moves 18:SchutteGod 709:site bans 619:site bans 349:consensus 271:has been 150:consensus 103:Hello4321 215:Ward3001 129:edit war 736:NoACEMM 646:NoACEMM 505:Serendi 497:vandals 441:deleted 353:magnius 144:blocked 51:undated 312:or on 172:WP:RSs 161:WP:3RR 41:jjrj24 168:WP:OR 747:talk 699:The 657:talk 609:The 572:talk 481:talk 461:talk 404:talk 357:talk 241:talk 219:talk 190:talk 107:talk 74:Grsz 45:talk 22:talk 512:ous 253:of 181:up. 156:. 47:} 749:) 738:}} 734:{{ 711:, 659:) 648:}} 644:{{ 621:, 574:) 483:) 463:) 443:. 407:) 359:) 328:}} 322:{{ 316:. 305:}} 299:{{ 293:. 243:) 221:) 213:. 192:) 109:) 24:) 745:( 655:( 570:( 554:) 551:⭐ 548:( 479:( 459:( 401:( 376:. 355:( 284:. 239:( 217:( 188:( 105:( 57:. 43:{ 20:(

Index

SchutteGod
talk
18:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
History of the United States Republican Party
jjrj24
talk
undated
00:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
List of female state governors in the United States
Grsz

17:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
KillerChihuahua
17:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello4321
talk
07:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Sarah Palin

edit war
three-revert rule
three-revert rule
blocked
consensus
dispute resolution
WP:3RR

WP:OR
WP:RSs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.