User talk:Schwalker

514:) which restates the same idea: "The Nazis wanted to return to what they saw as the original, natural state of human life and society. On the other hand, Nazi medical authorities also wanted to breed a better human, and this induced them to entertain radical measures to alter and 'improve' the course of human biological history." These ideas are said to have a "strong anti-Semitic element": "Jews were blamed for having suppressed more natural German healing practices...Judaism itself was blamed for an ethic that sanctioned animal abuse..." The connection between Nazi Germany and animal protection and environmentalism is described in Rudacille's summary, leading to Nazi legislation: "Laws against vivisection and kosher slaughter were followed by wildlife legislation in 1934 and 1934." Rudacille's book quotes the following from Goebbel's diary: "Meat-eating is a perversion of our human nature. When we reach a higher level of civilization, we shall doubtless overcome it." Proctor quotes an even more revealing passage from Goebbel: "The Fuhrer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race...Both have no point of contact to the animal element, and thus, in the end, they will be destroyed. The Fuhrer is a convinced vegetarian, on principle." — 872:

influential...The human race, Nazis argued, had become contaminated and impure through a mixing of the races and the eating of animal flesh. "Regeneration of the human race" was linked to animal protection and vegetarianism. Wagner's principal concern was with the biological purification of Germany and its political future. He believed that socialists had to ally with vegetarians, animal protectionists, and friends of temperance to save mankind from Jewish aggression...In an essay, entitled "Heldentum und Christenheit" (Heroism and Christianity), Wagner articulated an anti-Semitic theory of history, which linked vegetarianism to Germany's future... (Arluke, Sanders. 1996.

786:, Rudacille writes, "Wagner...believed that civilization could be regenerated through vegetarianism". Hitler's "civilization" was not concerned with "spiritually renewing" Jews, and according to Rudacille, "of course the Jews, and all forms of unnatural "Jewish" though, must be purged." What is this civilization, then? Obviously, one composed of Aryans. Reminding you again of Proctor's thesis which concludes, "...that the Nazis' forward-looking health activism ultimately came from...the ideal of a sanitary racial utopia reserved exclusively for pure and healthy Germans." So we have consensus across the board. Not Wagner's "humanity", not "civilization", but a 696:. Several of his biographers point to the influence of the nationalist antisemitic composer, Richard Wagner. In an 1881 essay, Wagner had claimed that the human race had become contaminated and impure through racial mixing and the eating of animal flesh (the original human diet in his viewe, too, was vegetarian); a new kind of socialism was needed to purify Germany of these twin evilsm calling upon "true and hearty fellowship with the vegetarians, the protectors of animals, and the friends if temperance" to save the German people from Jewish aggression. Wagner claimed that abstaining from a fleshy diet would allow 494:

was true for alochol use. Concerns about alcohol's effect upon genetic health were raised, and chronic alcoholics were sterilized under the Sterilization Law to protect the "German germ plasm". In the same vein, Hitler believed that a vegetarian diet could, according to the racial policy of Nazi Germany, spiritually renew the Aryan race. Hitler attributed the origins of his beliefs to Wagner's ideas about racial purity which influenced the ideas behind

563:". I think the article should not confuse things which in deed may be interconnected, but in a different way. Vegetarianism and environmentalism were according to some scholars a part of Nazi ideology. Most scholars agree that H. himself practiced or pretended some form of vegetarianism. But this alone does not imply that we should ascribe a belief to H. that vegetarianism would be an effective means to "protect" or "spiritually renew" an Aryan race. -- 1789: 741:. Proctor argues throughout the book that "...cancer prevention also fit with the Nazi emphasis on natural modes of living. Hitler, we should recall, was a vegetarian and did not smoke or drink...Vegetarian peoples seems to have very low cancer rates, a view endorsed by Liek and one that grew in popularity in the Nazi era.." If you had actually read the biographies that Proctor refers to, you would understand 1016:), but not "far right". You say "I'm not sure how problems can be solved by silencing important facts". The onus is upon you to show how the group is important and hence if their award deserves mention - do they have an article? A useful and typical cut-off point for whether awards should be included on an English Knowledge biography is whether the awarding group has an article. 08:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 1441: 1155:

students on an emotional level and motivate them to start thinking on their own. However, I've readded a more accurate version of the critique of de Z.' alleged revisionism with two additional citations of H-Net reviews, one calling de Z. a revisionist, and the other describes the reviewed book as nearly frankly revisionist, and in particular critisizes a chapter written by Z.

750:. Proctor does not question the Wagner explanation in any way, but in fact supports it throughout his book. According to Proctor's publisher, "...he also concludes that the Nazis' forward-looking health activism ultimately came from the same twisted root as their medical crimes: the ideal of a sanitary racial utopia reserved exclusively for pure and healthy Germans." 754:

publisher goes to great lengths to support: "Proctor shows that cancer also became an important social metaphor, as the Nazis portrayed Jews and other "enemies of the Volk" as tumors that must be eliminated from the German body politic." Proctor argues that Hitler's reasons are not entirely clear for one reason: in order to support Proctor's idea that

1702:. I am certain that the vast majority in the lists are politicians, there may be a number who have got mixed in for being party members and not much else. Either way these srtubs are a start, and whether Claussen is a sociologist or not, it leaves the gateway open to editors such as yourself who know who they are and can expand them accordingly. 498:. In an 1881 essay, Wagner claimed that the human race had become contaminated and impure through racial mixing and the eating of animal flesh. Wagner believed that the original diet was vegetarian. Proctor describes Wagner's call for a "a new kind of socialism..to purify Germany" from "the eating of animal flesh" and "Jewish aggression". 770:. I don't understand then, why you have replied with "Wagner's position was that vegetarianism would allow human, not just "Aryan" redemption, and Hitler seems to have taken part of the message to heart, which is not necessarily the whole of Wagner's concept." Please explain. I will add the disputed material to this section, again: 207:, I see no edits to any talk pages. Initially, when I removed your report, I had not checked that user's contributions, and just looked at the talk page and saw no warnings for the supposed insults. My apologies if this incident has caused you any incovenience. On a side note, articles that are currently being 657:

We seem to have a communication problem. I just finished explaining to you that it is known, and the article explicitly mentions that Hitler became a vegetarian because of Wagner's beliefs. These beliefs are directly linked to the racial policy of the Nazi's. What part of this do you disagree with

488:

The original text was correct and covers far more than just p. 88; Read the chapter and the other sources. The racial policies of Nazi Germany were based on achieving racial purity of the Aryan race. These racial policies were directly related to Nazi beliefs about the environment and what they put

283:

If you were aware of the controversy, but have deliberately not reflected that in the article, then it would a form of intellectual dishonesty and against the spirit of cooperative and consensual editing of Knowledge. So I will assume that you are not aware of the controversy, and therefore encourage

155:

I have removed the report to AIV as there was only one minor warning given to the ip. Furthermore, it appears that this might be a content dispute since the ip is substituting text. I have commented at their talkpage that this is inappropriate and that changes should be discussed and consensus gained

1206:

Oh, there are more sources. I think more factual work is crucial, because we have here a classical situation, where a living person is interested in the manipulation of the article about him. I can understand that, but he is a public person and he can not avoid that also critical content of reliable

1154:

1998 is not on politices but on philosophical logic. Since I don't have access to the text, I would guess that the author doesn't really claim that Bill Clinton was a crook, but that he only uses the sentence as a hypothetical example. Teachers often use such examples in their class to address their

1565:

I'm of the opinion that every leading and most influential Marxist theorist of each era does belong into the template. I don't know if later Marxists were less or more smart than Marx and Engels themselves. But the younger theorists always know what has happened in history until now, so they have a

390:

Regarding the title "Classical Marxism" thats the term that was used in my sociology theory subjects and I just assumed it was widely used so I didn't bother with references (and yes it did just look at Marx and Engels) but when I get a chance I'll go and find my uni notes and try and find a proper

120:

article into the Category: Anti-Judaism. I guess the reason is that Marx's essay is considered to take a standpoint hostile to Judaism. I've removed the article from that category again. Please note that the article gives the sourced information that most critical scholars reject the argument that

1571:

For the Encyclopaedia, it is the knowledge and opinion of the experts in a field which is important, not how prominent someone is for a broad audience. Our task is to educate the broad audience, not to reinforce their prejudice. Besides, we have to keep in mind that for certain decades ago, and in

830:

The concept of the "human race" is used differently by Hitler and the Nazis. Using the term "Aryan race" to make this distinction clear is a form of disambiguation. Unless you can actually address this issue, I'm going to add it back into the article as it was originally supported by Proctor and

493:

notes how the Nazi officials on racial policy were concerned with the weakening of the genetic profile of Germans from radium and X-rays; tobacco use is described by Nazi racial hygienists as an "obstacle to racial policy" and linked by Nazi's to the "corruption of the German germ plasm"; the same

131:

Actually, this category is totally appropriate considering Marx offers a radical critique of Judaism throughout the essay, coming to some fairly negative conclusions about Jews and Judaism. I'm not saying that Marx was an anti-Semite, only that this particular tract is very much against Judaism --

745:

Proctor writes "though the reasons behind his decision...are not entirely clear". There are two simple reasons: 1) Hitler's vegetarianism was attributed to Wagner and several other reasons, such as Hitler's concern for his personal health, and 2) this leads right into Proctor's thesis, Hitler's

1503:

The others--- Most people don't know of them, they are not prominent, either popularly, or theoretically, on the level of Marx and Engels- which is the defining issue when you put M&E into a list like this. Why can't they all be resigned to the "More Marxists" section? You say "You Can't Get

1301:

imprint. I'm not familiar with it. Could you please post on my Talk page a more precise citation so I could research that imprint? It interests me very much. The other matter is opening up a WP article like so: "On the Jewish question" which may address your concerns (I hope). I would certainly

1499:

contributors, period. Most people would include Trotsky (though he is despised in some quarters despite being probably more famous than Lenin historically by his own actions/writing), and I think its justified to include Luxemburg and Kautsky. Especially Gramsci and Bertstein in a way are real

806:

Only the "pure-blooded" Aryan type, the highest, was essential to the organic whole....Non-Aryan types were sub-human and degenerate accretions which were ranked biologically between human beings and chimpanzees. They were described by the S.S. Main Office as "a creation of nature, apparently

753:

In fact, Hitler's reasons for vegetarianism are as clear as they need to be. Proctor's rationale for stating that they weren't, was in order to buttress his cancer argument; Proctor does not cast doubt on the reasons for Hitler's vegetarianism in any way, nor the Wagner explanation which the

712:

To summarize: For Procter, Hitlers reasons for vegetarianism are not entirely clear, Wagner's position was that vegetarianism would allow human, not just "Aryan" redemption, and Hitler seems to have taken part of the message to heart, which is not necessarily the whole of Wagner's concept.

412:

I am not the author of this material, nor do I care much for its inclusion, but Devi isn't being used as a reliable source - Devi's position is being represented in relation to her beliefs about Hitler's vegetarianism. If there is a question about the accuracy of these statements, or their

871:

The vision of the future was a world where animals would not be unnecessarily harmed...meat-eating became a symbol of the decay of other civilizations; and vegetarianism became a symbol of the new, pure civilization that was to be Germany's future....Wagner's thinking was particularly

306:

is clever. However, if I'm not mistaken, in the last instance it seems to depend on the existence of a scholary controversy which till now has only been claimed in wikipedia user-space. So I won't guarantee not to revert the article back to the well sourced version again in the next

1012:

This is also, I believe, why you want the award from the Ingolstadt Research Institute for Contemporary History included, and to describe them as a "far-right revisionist group". I can't find any evidence of this being the case. I find evidence of their being revisionist (eg

346:

Hi, just wanted to let you know that in the interest of resolving this discussion I have taken the liberty of transferring your reasoning from the various edit summaries and put them into a discussion on the talk page so that others may also contribute to this debate. Cheers,

1572:

their own countries, some of these pepople, for example Bernstein, Luxemburg or Gramsci were much better known then they are today, or then they are in other countries. But encyclopeadic relevance is an universal concept, not a question of time and place of the reader.

1350:. There is no centralized area for discussion and if anything it appears the consensus may be against your position after a brief skimming of the page. Please complete the process properly, listed under today's date, and in 5 days we will see if consensus has emerged. 380:

Hi Scwalker, I don't know if that is how things are meant to work on Knowledge - I'm not sure how else you are meant to get a resolution of this issue if people can't participate in the discussion. However its really neither here nor there to me as long as it does get

1037:

article from diffierent sources, all of which describe it as an online forum or messageboard. While it is indeed a reputable forum, with a great deal of interest and subscription, it's also less subject to scrutiny or peer review than a journal or even a major

1756:"Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Knowledge. ... Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism." 1504:

Around" some of the obscure individuals who are unknown outside of their currents, but to a non-Marxist who is most likely to come upon this box, your diluting the truly famous Marxists with scores of relative unknowns, which is very anti-social, you know.

1187:

Yes, I had asked for new ideas, and I do agree that listing the sources could be a step towards a more factual work on the article. I did not know before that there are so many seemingly independent sources for de Z.'s birthdates. Greeting

807:

completely similar biologically to the human with hands, feet, and a sort of brain, with eyes and mouth, which is, however, completely different, a horrible creature who is only an attempt at being human..." It was the value of a people (

235:

Elaborating on this; when I used the term "received no warnings" in my edit summary, I was not referring to the IP address' supposed homophobic comments, but rather, for the insults you said that a similar IP had placed on your talk page.

963:. Well, this is very doubtfull. Rather, the Nazi's goal was to keep what they believed to be the Arayn race pure, and apart from other people. But this does not rule out to acknowledge other civilizations, for example on other continents. 1760:

Please do not throw accusations of "vandalism" around lightly, even in edit summaries. This is especially true when an editor provides information supporting the validity of the edit quoted directly from Knowledge policies, such as

1649:

No problem, I do not feel offended personally. I hope you don't mind my revert too much. I'm aiming to support the sober work on the article as far as I can. The name on the picture of the gravestone reads "Helena Demuth", which is

532:

Thank you for your long explanation nad please excuse me that I'm not able at the moment to address each source that you've presented. I still can't see that they would sufficiently support the sentence in the wikipedia article:

585:

But that's exactly what it was, what Wagner said, (according to Proctor) and what Hitler believed after reading Wagner. In fact, the quote from Hitler is a paraphrase from Wagner! I'll simply find more references for you.

255:

Okay, I think I understand now, but a single attack on a talk page does not warrant a block. If protection is necessary in content disputes no matter who is involved, full protection will be used, and not semi-protection.

911:) further supports the idea that Wagner was concerned with spiritually renewing the Aryan race, not the human race. I've added a small portion of the material to a footnote. The full text reveals a great deal more. — 408:

You removed material from this article with the edit summary, "Hitler as a vegetarian -removed sentence which did not contribute to the article's topic; neither savitridevi.org nor S. Devi herself are a reliable

1852:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1654:. It seems that other relatives of Karl like his children and grandchildren have been burried there, too. I'm not sure whether Helene and Karl had a relationship or children. Greetings, -- 1033:

article is wrong, then find a number of reliable references describing it as anything more than an online discussion forum and change it. There are seven fairly solid references in the

1725:"A curtain had fallen, my holy of holies was rent asunder, and new gods had to be installed." Karl Marx, Letter to his father, 10 November 1837, MEGA I (i) 2, pp.213-221 paragraph 14-- 1628:

My apologies for any offence. I understand Marx had a relationship with his housekeeper and I believe she is buried in the grave (with his wife). You can see her name on the headstone

790:

reserved for pure Germans: the so-called "Aryan race". But you have ignored this distinction, changing it to the "human race" as Wagner used it, but not as Hitler used it. What

1082:, then I do not think it should be used. If there were plenty of sources accusing de Zayas of being revisionist, then it would be a different issue. But one? It's not enough - 1682:

but we can't be held accountable for the several who may not be and are just party members and may be sociologists or whatever. We run by categories and picked up weiss through

1492:

The Frankford School, I'd point out right away and as a side note, is not an individual, and if it was, its mother must have hated it, what would it call itself - T.F. School?

776:

Hitler believed that a vegetarian diet could both alleviate his personal health problems and according to the racial policy of Nazi Germany, spiritually renew the Aryan race.

969:

Hitler ... believed that (only) a civilization composed of Aryans could be regenerated through vegetarianism, and this according to the racial policy of Nazi Germany.

1302:

support that. I think the current "Big T" article is merely one school of Marxism's review of Marx's work by that title. Trotsky has another view. Have a nice day. --

413:

interpretation, please raise that issue on the talk page, but claiming the source isn't reliable when it is used to represent the proponent, isn't a valid argument. —

581:

But this alone does not imply that we should ascribe a belief to H. that vegetarianism would be an effective means to "protect" or "spiritually renew" an Aryan race.

811:), of a living race, that was the basic unit of measurement of worth for Hitler. The members of the Aryan race were considered fully human. (Walter et al. 1990. 611:

No, please don't find references for me, I'm not important here. Rather the article has to be well sourced. When editing Knowledge, we also must keep in mind the

1585:

at Frankfurt. Since they are very important and influential for Marxism, I think it is justified to use this umbrealla term "Frankfurt School" in this template.

831:

other authors. The very notion is even supported by Proctor's publisher. It seems like you are arguing against an idea that the text does not even express. —

1052:

Re the addendum - I just picked a link at random describing them as "far right" - there weren't many. I couldn't find any describing them as revisionist.

555:

I don't know of a clear statement by H. himself or a scholar ascribing to him that the had such a belief. For example, vegetarianism was not a part of the

121:

Marx would be an anti-Semit (I have not checked that source myself). So there must be a good reason to put the article into the category "anti-judaism".

1078:" in the article, as it is a very loaded term (almost an epithet when used to describe a historian). As the sole source for this term is one review on 1207:

sources are mentioned. It seems that he has a strong and agressive acting Lobby. I do not think that wikipedia will tolerate that any longer. Regards--

971:

But we don't have a direct quote to support this conclusion, and to construct such a synthesis on our own is prohibited for an author of Knowledge. --

948:

This is what several scholars say, while it is still unclear how, and to what extent. For example, the young H. possibly also had been influenced by

312:

To read about a subject before I edit an article is what I've tried so far on en.wikipedia. Thank you for encouragement to continue this practice.

65: 1599: 25:

to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

996:. The birth date will not be re-added to the article, and if that's the reason for the neutrality template, it really should not be there. 1877: 196: 203:) for "insulting me on their talk-page after a warning". I'm not sure which IP you are talking about here, but looking through this IP's 156:

for such changes. If the ip continues to ignore discussion then warn them, and if they ignore the warnings bring it back to AIV. Thanks.

1401:

As far as I can see you are not an Knowledge-administrator, or would have rights to close processes which other users have started. --

284:

you to read more widely before you contribute to the article in question. In the meantime, I will endeavour to find you a reference.

1261: 1242: 1023:

The birthday - nope, if it's being removed, even by anonymous IPs, then it can stay out. A birthday adds very little to an article.

1674:

This is exactly why editors like you Schwalker are needed who have the knowledge to expand these stubs. The point is that Claussen

766:

believed that a vegetarian diet could...according to the racial policy of Nazi Germany, spiritually renew the Aryan race", it said

1006:. Such a notable figure's being a revisionist would not be confined to one cherry-picked review from an online discussion forum ( 1873: 1528: 1415:

One doesn't need to be an administrator to see consensus (or a lack thereof) nor to understand and follow through with policy.

1118:

You have made a good case for the birthdate to be included given it is available in the public domain, so okay. I do wonder

908: 876: 815: 1122:

IP addresses are constantly trying to remove it - are we sure 31 May 1947 is correct? Is there more than one source for it?

68:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

1582: 560: 543: 49: 1254: 1235: 1046: 428: 34: 22: 1864:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1322:

Translated by H. J. Stenning. (New York: International Publishers. 1926. Pp. 208. ... "On the Jewish question"

1105:, and is from a reputable source. Does this mean we should then include in the Bill Cinton article the statement that 933:

I'm afraid you still carry out original research by combining facts and asumptions in order to arrive at a new theory:

1869: 1461: 640:. But as far as I know, it is unknown what Hitler had read, and who exactly had influenced his opinions and attitudes. 212: 1373:. Now you won't expect me to file the same request a third time and start the process from the begining. Greeting, -- 1172:

Hi, I started today listing the reliable sources for all disputed issues. Perhaps you like to add your sources too?--

1495:

Anyway, couldn't help myself there, when we speak of prominent Marxists its Marx, Engels and Lenin. They are the

1387:

Then, as you yourself stated on my talk page, there is no consensus to support the move and the issue is closed.

1103: 54: 1738: 1730: 190: 1770: 986: 684:, p. 136. He writes (with additional boldface emphasize by me on passages which seem to support my doubts): 1094:

that describes de Zayas as "revisionist" (or siding with the revisionists)?Perhaps an example would help.

1002:) is telling - you seem to want de Zayas labeled as a revisionist. Any such claim will need multiple very 1489:

I noticed you restored the Prominent Marxist list on the Marxist sidebar as a large collection of names.

1457: 1453: 1272: 848:

rewrite the material in question to meet my objections. That way, we will not have to edit war over it. —

117: 29: 1131:

You are right - the IHR described the Ingolstadt institute as revisionist, and not far right. My error.

186: 1007: 61: 1026:

That quote says he "sided with the revisionists" on one occasion. It does not call him a revisionist.

1814: 1516: 1150:

As far as I can see, the paper "The ‘Practical Turn’and the Convergence of Traditions" by M Luntley,

133: 1520: 1865: 1749: 1734: 1726: 1524: 1039: 953: 916: 892: 853: 836: 663: 591: 519: 436: 418: 361: 360:

Hallo Grant65 and JenLouise, I've removed edit summaries from the talk page again, and answered on

167: 157: 69: 1766: 1639: 1331: 1307: 1283: 1230: 794:

the Nazi's mean by the "human race"? Who was going to get "spiritually renewed" in Nazi Germany?

103: 77: 44: 1629: 1841: 1832: 905: 873: 812: 633: 303: 291: 204: 503: 1861: 1845: 1800: 1703: 1578: 1469: 1420: 1392: 1355: 1860:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1788: 1807: 1678:

and most of the time implies that they are a politician. Most of the articles started are

1212: 1177: 1083: 637: 495: 267: 247: 226: 1460:. As an editor previously involved in a similar discussion, you are invited to weigh in 1857: 1849: 1762: 1655: 1606: 1536: 1402: 1374: 1346:

In order to get proper consensus for a move, you need to properly list this request at

1189: 1159: 1137: 1058: 972: 912: 888: 849: 832: 717: 659: 644: 587: 564: 556: 515: 475: 432: 414: 392: 365: 348: 331: 171: 122: 91: 1686:. Please do not scold ALbert in the way that you did when most of the article started 500:

Wagner claimed that abstaining from a fleshy diet would allow a human moral redemption

1853: 1651: 1635: 1327: 1303: 1279: 1278:

I've commenced a discussion there, on the Talk page, on the issue. Please join in. --

993: 961:

for Hitler, the term "civilization" can only mean "a civilization composed of Aryans"

612: 144: 95: 39: 1347: 1099: 1091: 1014: 1003: 285: 208: 1095: 1794:

Good Luck! I know in your heart you're a great person. And never loose faith in

1465: 1416: 1388: 1351: 1075: 949: 451: 99: 1698:

is taken from german wikipedia where the articles are organised by party under

939:

Wagner...believed that civilization could be regenerated through vegetarianism.

1208: 1173: 751: 547: 259: 239: 218: 1581:

is a whole group of social scientists who colaborated since the 1920s at the

1132: 1053: 708:

to heart: "I don't touch meat largely of what Wagner says on the subject."

1690:

politicians and is obvious from German wikipedia. Most of his and my stubs

613:

Knowledge:SYN#Synthesis_of_published_material_serving_to_advance_a_position

758:

was Hitler's primary motivation for a vegetarian diet. This does not say

148: 1803:

once said, “Think like a man of action, and act like a man of thought.”

427:

I've removed the content for a completely different reason. Please see

1881: 1822: 1774: 1742: 1714: 1663: 1643: 1614: 1544: 1473: 1424: 1410: 1396: 1382: 1359: 1335: 1311: 1287: 1265: 1246: 1216: 1197: 1181: 1167: 1142: 1063: 980: 919: 895: 856: 839: 725: 666: 652: 594: 572: 522: 483: 465: 439: 421: 395: 368: 351: 334: 296: 270: 250: 229: 174: 160: 136: 125: 106: 80: 1558:

two edits of mine. And perhaps you agree with, or are responsible for

317:

Please let me repeat, that I don't demand you to find a reference for

1596:

strongly recommend an actual page for listing all recognized Marxists

692:

behind his decision (if reasons are to be expected in such matters)

90:

My apologies for the delay, the article has now been restored as a

1087: 1079: 1034: 1030: 170:, on the IP's talk-page. However, thanks for your notification. -- 166:

Actually I thought there had already been two warnings, by me and

1848:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

762:

to detract from Hitler's position. The article did not say that

1765:. In my opinion, your user page is in violation of this policy. 1297:

discussion. I have 2 issues of concern to me. You mentioned the

211:

over are not semi-protected, but rather are full protected (see

1435: 72:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place 1630:

http://www.plnewsforum.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/37865/

992:

Hi Schwalker. Okay. Firstly, the neutrality template. See

1045:

I've addressed your point about the Ingolstadt institute on

132:

thus it belongs in the category. Have you ever read it? --

1683: 1252:

Oops, they sourced from Hitler.org. I did not notice it.

76:

after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -

1591: 1559: 1555: 1507:

So-hopefully you'll mull that over, all I'm saying is:

1370: 1366: 1102:

as a crook. The piece is available via Google Scholar

1000: 632:

H. was interested in Wagner's operas, and attended the

447: 410: 200: 1562:

removal of some names and the addition of Bernstein's.

1369:and, after it had been changed by another user, on 967:However, now you combine these points to conclude: 94:. Note that the article may still be liable for an 429:Talk:Vegetarianism_of_Adolf_Hitler#Content_removed 98:discussion. Please improve on the article and add 1840:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1684:his article being categorized as a CDU politician 941:This is Rudacille's paraphrase of Wagner's ideas. 1510:"Think of the children, think of the children!" 782:There is nothing about Wagner in the above. In 636:and was befriend with Richard's daughter in law 506:) Rudacille summarizes Proctor's position from 698:a human redemption - possibly even for the Jews 688:Hitler appears to have given up meat in 1931, 8: 1020:In response to your points on my talk page: 538:Hitler believed that a vegetarian diet could 1074:I would like to avoid any use of the term " 1107:Bill Clinton has been described as a crook 60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 1598:" and reinstalled the more comprehensive 1086:may be of interest. Is this review from 737:is the relationship between Nazi's, and 508:Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis 844:On second thought, I would like to see 1600:List of contributors to Marxist theory 1009:), unless the claim was a nonsense. 1318:Never mind. I've identified the work: 1293:Thanks for your notice regarding the 302:Your reasoning why I should not edit 7: 325:should be supported with references. 1365:No, I've filed the same request on 863:simply find more references for you 680:Now I've looked up Robert Procter: 1733:) 05:10, 16 December 2009 (UTC) -- 994:Knowledge:BLP#Privacy_of_birthdays 904:(2002 Cambridge University Press; 489:in their bodies. Proctor's book, 14: 1866:review the candidates' statements 1590:I have also followed the (your?) 1787: 1439: 946:Hitler was influenced by Wagner. 733:The central thesis of Proctor's 450:the revert, sorry about that. -- 902:Nietzsche, Biology and Metaphor 1872:. For the Election committee, 1842:Arbitration Committee election 1833:ArbCom elections are now open! 1566:different point to start from. 1: 1882:16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 1743:02:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 1583:Institute for Social Research 1448:On The Jewish Question -: --> 981:19:58, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 920:09:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC) 861:And to revisit my promise to 784:The Scalpel and the Butterfly 561:Racial policy of Nazi Germany 544:racial policy of Nazi Germany 474:Thanks MPerel, no problem. -- 396:02:42, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 107:23:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 102:to reduce such likelihood. - 81:23:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 30:The five pillars of Knowledge 1700:German politicians by party' 1047:Talk:Alfred-Maurice de Zayas 896:12:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC) 857:10:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC) 840:10:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC) 726:11:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 667:03:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 653:21:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 595:04:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 573:19:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 523:01:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 484:21:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 466:20:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 440:08:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 422:08:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 369:20:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 352:13:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 335:22:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 297:17:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 271:12:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC) 251:11:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC) 230:11:28, 14 October 2007 (UTC) 116:Hallo, I see you've put the 50:How to write a great article 1868:and submit your choices on 1664:12:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 1644:12:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 1554:I think you are writing of 559:, and is not mentioned in " 213:Knowledge:Protection policy 175:16:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 161:11:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 1897: 1874:MediaWiki message delivery 1823:06:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 1775:17:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 1452:It has been proposed that 1266:21:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC) 1247:21:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC) 1217:07:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC) 1198:13:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 1182:14:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 1168:08:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1152:Philosophical Explorations 1143:13:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 1064:10:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 1798:! Keep up the good work. 1715:10:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC) 1670:German "politician" stubs 1615:19:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC) 1545:19:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC) 1500:stretches, though, IMO. 1098:scholarly work describes 137:07:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 126:08:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1659: 1610: 1540: 1456:be renamed and moved to 1406: 1378: 1193: 1163: 976: 721: 648: 568: 546:, spiritually renew the 479: 1474:23:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 1425:06:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 1411:06:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 1397:06:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 1383:06:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 1360:06:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 1336:09:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 1312:09:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 1288:18:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 1256:Otolemur crassicaudatus 1237:Otolemur crassicaudatus 987:Alfred-Maurice de Zayas 704:to have taken at least 404:Vegetarianism of Hitler 1676:is a member of the SPD 1458:On the Jewish Question 1454:On The Jewish Question 1449:On the Jewish Question 1273:On The Jewish Question 882: 881: 821: 820: 779: 778: 735:The Nazi War on Cancer 710: 694:are not entirely clear 682:The Nazi War on Cancer 512:The Nazi War on Cancer 491:The Nazi War on Cancer 118:On the Jewish Question 112:On the Jewish Question 21:Hello, Schwalker, and 1846:Arbitration Committee 1780:A cup of tea for you! 1531:) 18:34, 29 July 2008 869: 868: 804: 803: 774: 773: 686: 96:articles for deletion 86:Re : Poole - HAL 9000 510:(also duplicated in 1850:arbitration process 1326:Have a nice day. -- 1040:newspaper of record 954:Lanz von Liebenfels 706:part of the message 362:User talk:JenLouise 185:Okay, you reported 168:User:ConfuciusOrnis 70:Knowledge:Questions 1862:arbitration policy 1535:Signature added -- 1482:Prominent Marxists 756:concern for cancer 690:though the reasons 634:Bayreuth festivals 391:reference for it. 35:How to edit a page 1829: 1828: 1547: 1533: 1519:comment added by 1486:Dear Schwalker, 1479: 1478: 1109:? Of course not. 542:according to the 323:wikipedia-article 304:Classical Marxism 1888: 1821: 1819: 1812: 1801:Henri L. Bergson 1791: 1784: 1783: 1712: 1711: 1694:make sense. The 1579:Frankfurt school 1551:Hallo Samboring, 1534: 1532: 1513: 1443: 1442: 1436: 1257: 1238: 1004:reliable sources 900:Gregory Moore's 502:... (See also: 463: 460: 457: 454: 294: 288: 262: 242: 221: 100:reliable sources 75: 1896: 1895: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1870:the voting page 1836: 1815: 1808: 1806: 1782: 1753: 1722: 1705: 1704: 1672: 1626: 1514: 1484: 1451: 1440: 1344: 1323: 1276: 1255: 1236: 1227: 1092:reliable source 990: 638:Winifred Wagner 496:Nazism and race 461: 458: 455: 452: 406: 321:. Instead, the 292: 286: 281: 269: 260: 249: 240: 228: 219: 199:) on the page ( 183: 153: 114: 88: 73: 55:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 1894: 1892: 1839: 1835: 1830: 1827: 1826: 1804: 1792: 1781: 1778: 1763:WP:USER#NOTOWN 1752: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1735:Oracleofottawa 1727:Oracleofottawa 1721: 1718: 1671: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1625: 1622: 1620: 1618: 1617: 1603: 1587: 1586: 1574: 1573: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1552: 1483: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1446: 1444: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1343: 1342:Requested move 1340: 1339: 1338: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1314: 1275: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1226: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1201: 1200: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1050: 1043: 1027: 1024: 989: 984: 965: 964: 957: 942: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 885: 884: 883: 825: 824: 823: 822: 798: 797: 796: 795: 780: 771: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 641: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 557:Nuremberg laws 553: 552: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 504:Wagner's essay 469: 468: 443: 442: 405: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 385: 384: 383: 382: 374: 372: 371: 357: 356: 355: 354: 340: 338: 337: 327: 326: 314: 313: 309: 308: 280: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 266: 246: 225: 187:172.163.27.244 182: 179: 178: 177: 158:LessHeard vanU 152: 141: 140: 139: 113: 110: 92:contested prod 87: 84: 66:sign your name 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 32: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1893: 1884: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1834: 1831: 1825: 1824: 1820: 1818: 1813: 1811: 1802: 1797: 1793: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1779: 1777: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1767:Beyond My Ken 1764: 1758: 1757: 1751: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1719: 1717: 1716: 1713: 1710: 1709: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1652:Helene Demuth 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1632: 1631: 1623: 1621: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1605:Greetings, -- 1604: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1570: 1569: 1564: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1511: 1508: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1493: 1490: 1487: 1481: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1438: 1437: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1371:30 April 2008 1368: 1367:29 April 2008 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1300: 1299:Stenning 1926 1296: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1274: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1232: 1224: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1156: 1153: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1108: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1065: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1056: 1051: 1048: 1044: 1041: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1021: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1015: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1001: 997: 995: 988: 985: 983: 982: 978: 974: 970: 962: 958: 955: 951: 947: 943: 940: 936: 935: 934: 921: 918: 914: 910: 907: 903: 899: 898: 897: 894: 890: 886: 880: 878: 875: 867: 866: 864: 860: 859: 858: 855: 851: 847: 843: 842: 841: 838: 834: 829: 828: 827: 826: 819: 817: 814: 810: 802: 801: 800: 799: 793: 789: 788:racial utopia 785: 781: 777: 772: 769: 765: 761: 757: 752: 749: 744: 740: 736: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 723: 719: 716:Greetings, -- 714: 709: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 685: 683: 668: 665: 661: 656: 655: 654: 650: 646: 642: 639: 635: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 614: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 596: 593: 589: 584: 583: 582: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 551: 549: 545: 539: 536: 535: 534: 524: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 492: 487: 486: 485: 481: 477: 473: 472: 471: 470: 467: 464: 449: 445: 444: 441: 438: 434: 430: 426: 425: 424: 423: 420: 416: 411: 403: 397: 394: 389: 388: 387: 386: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 370: 367: 363: 359: 358: 353: 350: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 336: 333: 329: 328: 324: 320: 316: 315: 311: 310: 305: 301: 300: 299: 298: 295: 289: 278: 272: 268: 265: 264: 263: 254: 253: 252: 248: 245: 244: 243: 234: 233: 232: 231: 227: 224: 223: 222: 214: 210: 206: 205:contributions 202: 198: 195: 192: 188: 180: 176: 173: 169: 165: 164: 163: 162: 159: 151:vandalisation 150: 146: 143:re report to 142: 138: 135: 130: 129: 128: 127: 124: 119: 111: 109: 108: 105: 104:Mailer Diablo 101: 97: 93: 85: 83: 82: 79: 78:Mailer Diablo 71: 67: 63: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 31: 28: 27: 26: 24: 19: 18: 1837: 1816: 1809: 1799: 1795: 1759: 1755: 1754: 1750:WP:VANDALISM 1707: 1706: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1679: 1675: 1673: 1633: 1627: 1624:Bad Language 1619: 1595: 1515:— Preceding 1512: 1509: 1506: 1502: 1496: 1494: 1491: 1488: 1485: 1447: 1345: 1298: 1294: 1277: 1253: 1234: 1228: 1171: 1158:Greeting, -- 1157: 1151: 1149: 1138: 1133: 1119: 1106: 1100:Bill Clinton 1059: 1054: 1011: 998: 991: 968: 966: 960: 945: 938: 932: 901: 870: 862: 845: 808: 805: 791: 787: 783: 775: 767: 763: 759: 755: 747: 746:concern for 742: 738: 734: 715: 711: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 687: 681: 679: 643:Greeting, -- 580: 554: 541: 537: 531: 511: 507: 499: 490: 407: 373: 364:. Cheers, -- 339: 330:Greetings -- 322: 318: 282: 258: 257: 238: 237: 217: 216: 193: 184: 154: 115: 89: 59: 20: 16: 15: 1708:Dr. Blofeld 1680:politicians 1076:revisionist 999:This edit ( 950:Karl Lueger 431:. Thanks. — 279:Marx/Engels 209:edit-warred 1858:topic bans 1810:Brendon is 1464:. Thanks. 909:0521812305 877:1566394414 816:0809131919 658:and why? — 548:Aryan race 181:AIV report 147:regarding 134:Wassermann 74:{{helpme}} 62:Wikipedian 40:Help pages 1854:site bans 1656:Schwalker 1634:jonathan 1607:Schwalker 1537:Schwalker 1521:Samboring 1403:Schwalker 1375:Schwalker 1190:Schwalker 1160:Schwalker 1090:the sole 973:Schwalker 913:Viriditas 889:Viriditas 850:Viriditas 833:Viriditas 809:Volkswert 718:Schwalker 700:. Hitler 660:Viriditas 645:Schwalker 588:Viriditas 565:Schwalker 516:Viriditas 476:Schwalker 433:Viriditas 415:Viriditas 409:source)". 393:JenLouise 381:resolved. 366:Schwalker 349:JenLouise 332:Schwalker 172:Schwalker 123:Schwalker 64:! Please 1796:yourself 1636:Telaviv1 1592:proposal 1529:contribs 1517:unsigned 1328:Ludvikus 1304:Ludvikus 1280:Ludvikus 1084:WP:UNDUE 760:anything 197:contribs 149:Eugenics 45:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 1720:Well... 1029:If the 615:policy. 23:welcome 1844:. The 1696:system 1466:JPG-GR 1417:JPG-GR 1389:JPG-GR 1352:JPG-GR 768:Hitler 764:Wagner 748:cancer 739:cancer 540:(...) 145:WP:AIV 1497:major 1348:WP:RM 1209:KarlV 1174:KarlV 1088:H-Net 1080:H-Net 1035:H-net 1031:H-net 702:seems 448:fixed 307:time. 287:Grant 1878:talk 1817:here 1771:talk 1739:talk 1731:talk 1660:talk 1640:talk 1611:talk 1577:The 1560:this 1556:this 1541:talk 1525:talk 1470:talk 1462:here 1421:talk 1407:talk 1393:talk 1379:talk 1356:talk 1332:talk 1308:talk 1284:talk 1262:talk 1243:talk 1233:RS? 1231:this 1213:talk 1194:talk 1178:talk 1164:talk 1134:Neıl 1096:This 1055:Neıl 977:talk 917:Talk 906:ISBN 893:Talk 874:ISBN 854:Talk 837:Talk 813:ISBN 722:talk 664:Talk 649:talk 592:Talk 569:talk 520:Talk 480:talk 437:Talk 419:Talk 293:Talk 261:Sebi 241:Sebi 220:Sebi 215:) ~ 201:diff 191:talk 1838:Hi, 1805::) 1688:are 1295:T/t 1229:Is 1120:why 952:or 944:2. 937:1. 846:you 792:did 743:why 462:el 1880:) 1856:, 1773:) 1741:) 1692:do 1662:) 1642:) 1613:) 1543:) 1527:• 1472:) 1423:) 1409:) 1395:) 1381:) 1358:) 1334:) 1310:) 1286:) 1264:) 1245:) 1225:RS 1215:) 1196:) 1188:-- 1180:) 1166:) 979:) 959:3. 915:| 891:| 865:: 852:| 835:| 724:) 662:| 651:) 590:| 571:) 518:| 482:) 459:er 446:I 435:| 417:| 319:me 290:| 256:~ 236:~ 1876:( 1769:( 1737:( 1729:( 1658:( 1638:( 1609:( 1602:. 1594:" 1539:( 1523:( 1468:( 1419:( 1405:( 1391:( 1377:( 1354:( 1330:( 1306:( 1282:( 1260:( 1241:( 1211:( 1192:( 1176:( 1162:( 1139:☎ 1060:☎ 1049:. 1042:. 975:( 956:. 887:— 879:) 818:) 720:( 647:( 586:— 567:( 550:. 478:( 456:P 453:M 194:· 189:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index