User talk:Scumbag - Knowledge (XXG)

1220:. You simply have to accept the fact that this isn't gameFAQs or gamewikis, this particular sites strives to be encyclopedic hence the guidelines along those of a real-world encyclopedia. In game, as far as I am aware, the origins of the name for Von Braun are never mentioned. Bearing in mind that these are game-developers we are talking about here, not actual rocket scientists, I somehow doubt that they would base any of the names used on rocket-ship pioneers. It's not impossible, but doesn't seem terribly likely either. It could have been inspired by one of their mother's maiden names for all we know. Again, you're not citing this for 1018:

who may be completely unfamiliar with the subject with some reference points and knowledge that the article wasn't just made up. Unless sources are found for those "facts" eventualy they will have to get removed. Look at any featured videogame article and the number of sources in it and things being sourced. Most of the time even things definitevly encountered in the game need to be sourced, let alone simple speculation such as tha name being based on certain something. I assure you, I am not trying to undermine your contributions, but this article has a lot of cruft which doesn't belong in an encyclopedia.

1909: 1819: 1173:

signle thing in the game that would point one way or another. The articles of any encyclopedia are written with the assumption that the reader does not know anything about the subject, hence why things need to be cited as to not appear as original research. I do know tha game and myself am a fan of it, but most people never played it and don't know anything about it, that's why we wrote the article. That's why any such claims in it need to be substantiated.

1571:

public" FAQ. Given that you freely admit to not caring about the VB/SS2 situation - and are obviously ill-equipped to know about the situation, why are you so quick to argue a topic you have absolutely no experience with? Feel free to remove the 'offending' facts if you're so offended, I'm sure someone who actually knows about System Shock 2'll stick it right back in. After all, that user knows System Shock 2 enough to properly deal with the piece.

927:

are not specifically Episode One/Two/Three, but use roman numerals as opposed to words. In addition, the titles are specifically known by their Episode number; in fact among fan members they are more known by their subtitles, i.e. The Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones, and Revenge of the Sith. Therefore, these cross-links are unneccesary, and should be removed/left off. If you still disagree you can always put it to a vote on the talk page.

587:, which states that content should be attributable to a reliable source. Although what is reliable is constantly under debate, it usually not good to simply cite the game as a source throughout an entire article; the game should only be cited itself in plot summary cases, and articles cannot be entirely plot summary unless they are a general subarticle (which Tiberium is not). Also, the "notable cards" section is 984:. My first take is that your choice of username is inappropriate, and I think it would be best for you to change it voluntarily. You say on your user page that it is your nickname outside Knowledge (XXG), but I think it nonetheless gives the wrong impression. Specifically, in scanning through the thread, I did a double take in thinking someone was writing an insult rather than simply mentioning your username. 2262: 2589: 2478: 1224:, you're citing this for other editors who for the most part strictly abide by wiki policies. If the article was ever to be peer-reviewed they would remove most anything from trivia that doesn't cite it's sources. And they have full authority to do so because this policy is established by the wikipedia's founder. While in Rome be Roman, as simple as that. No hard feelings. 2652: 1702:

to mention calling him "infamous" is yet another example of POV pushing. I also don't recall anyone seriously trying to force Bethesda into using 2D. As for me being an owner of Duck and Cover, you are simply wrong. I'd also like to see some proof of the alleged isolation of Fallout community, and it being to blame for the stuff you claim it is.

2157:

Hi, I am not particularly upset about TTN, I just think it's a shame sometimes when people like him who are trying to uphold the policy, are constantly being reported to administrators as if they had done something bad, it's the same for others such as betacommand. As for the nature of wikipedia the

1596:

Ah, I apologize for thinking you were mentioning the SS2 one. Regardless, it's not like anyone reading the Doom 3 article didn't know about all the "D3 sucks because it doesn't have the Gravity Gun" nonsense post-release. If someone actually needs someone to 'cite' that crap to believe it, then they

1269:

Why would I want to get this article peer-reviewed? I have a fairly strict no-vandallism rule for myself, and getting this article 'peer-reviewed' would be such a thing - you said it yourself, a lot of information would be deleted if such a thing would happen. Aside from the garish "cite this" bits,

1255:

I don't think you understood (or bothered to read for that matter) what the original research means. I also don't think you're familair enough with wikipedia to know that users sometimes get banned and articles can be protected from editing. You are not the Roman, people who wrote the policy are. If

1017:

I would like to point out that regardless of our difference of opinion on certain points, the first peer review that this article gets will most likely see all those so-called "facts" removed simply because thay are not properly sourced. The goal of sourcing things in articles is to provide a reader

936:

Your point fails; until I started editing redirecting pages, the only way to get to the Episode X articles were to type the entire "Half Life 2: Episode One/Two/Three" bit into the search engine - everything else redirected to the movies - an unacceptable situation. I'm just making the accessability

720:

Okay, I am willing to give you the opportunity to prove your point about editing an article to make it better, in spite of Knowledge (XXG)'s policies. The Children of Men (film) article has been essentially dominated by one editor (driving off two others). As you may recall, the end of the movie has

1701:

Your recent edits are clear POV pushing, like claiming that turn-based combat and isometric view are obsolete, while there are still many turn-based and isometric games around and in production. I also don't see how Roshambo's posts about Bethesda make him deserve a mention in Knowledge (XXG) - not

1448:

I see, so citing sources = messing things up? Yeah, I guess one way to look at it is that it really does mess things up for people who don't like substantiating their claims. Not that I care about them. Oh, and you think I was being insulting? I was merely pointing out a fact. Wait till you re-read

1308:

Btw, in case I haven't made it clear yet (judging by your last post) request for citing does not question your knowledge or intelligence, it's a way for others less familair with the subject to verify facts stated in the article. Would you want to read an article on subject you aren't familiar with

1235:

Given that Knowledge (XXG) is nothing more than a gameFAQs or Gamewiki - high-end idealistic statements being as worthless as citing the origins of the VB's name - anything that would be removed under a peer-review session would be inevitably added back into the article fairly quickly. Wikipedians,

1064:. Look at how many things are being sourced and what kinds of things are being sourced. I suppose you do know that Featured Article status implies that the article was heavily reviewed and selected as such by experienced editors? In an encyclopedia you don't take facts for granted, you source them. 958:

to allow users to choose between the films and the games. However you are making too wide of an assumption by putting a cross-link in the film articles just case a user should some how "wander in". I don't disagree with your wanting to making the HL games more accessible, but the cross-links in the

926:

states it, stubbornness is not vandalism. However, Wookieepedian is not being stubborn, I find it highly unlikely that a user would somehow wander into a Star Wars article when they are attempting to find the article for the game spin-offs to Half-Life 2. Especially in the case of the titles, which

904:

You're correct, the titles have little in common. One is a Half-Life product called Episode One/Two/Three, and one's a movie called Episode One/Two/Three. Since I already changed it so a user isn't immediately spat into the Star Wars movies when they punch in Episode One/Two/Three, I went the extra

515:

Here is a hypothetical situation for you. A movie about world without children closes with the first baby born in 20 years in a rowboat, waiting for rescue. The sounds of children's laughter and playing are heard in the background, and continue through the credits and soundtrack (but are not a part

1165:

Being a fan of the game does not empower you with the ability to read minds of the game developers the last time I checked. So your assumptions about things being named after something or other are groundless speculation and nothing but. If you're so certain about being right and such a big fan as

1140:

The lack of authority from diehard Wikipedians gives anyone with a serious and proper knowledge of the subject the relevent authority. When a Wikipedian comes in and adds a bunch of "cite this" crap onto a page, it's a clear sign of not having a modicum of understanding about the topic at hand. If

735:

policy. I haven't seen the movie, and know little about Hindi prayers. I know it looks like a cop-out - and lord knows I'd love to do it to prove my point - but I really don't have the requisite background to edit that information - a background that the one editor obviously has. If I had to, I'd

2235:

Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here

1570:

You're exactly right, I removed un-needed cite tags. The game's developers never sat down and wrote "yeah, we named our rocket ship after one of the father's of rocketry" on a "System Shock for Dummies and Wikipedians who'll read an article about it long after the game was forgotten by the gaming

1406:

It's easy to reconsile: People who originally wrote the relevent bits? Trustworthy. Those that've later messed it up later under the assumption that the people who originally wrote it didn't know what they were talking about? Vandalism, at best. If you want Knowledge (XXG) to be encyclopedic, the

1372:

If that's the way you see it then so be it. Although I have trouble reconciling your trust into articles on wikipedia with your earlier statements about the Featured Articles being written by a bunch of ignorants. After all, those articles make it to the front page, and they have plenty of things

1342:

side. No matter how many times an ignorant Wikipedian will vandalize an article requesting pointless citations, fans of (whatever topic) will inevitably set the record - and the article - on the correct path. I don't know if anyone'll cite the Von Braun thing, but I know it'll remain there in the

1125:

the starship link to the already existing disambig page, which listed the crater as well, so there goes your argument. As far as featured articles - let me get this straight. You're saying that featured articles are written and rewied by ignorant editors, and sourcing/citing things is completely

783:

Coming to Knowledge (XXG), flouting its basic principles, and having your work replaced with work that meets Knowledge (XXG)'s goals isn't going to be very rewarding. E2, on the other hand, is exactly what you're describing there, and, while it's never quite as informative, it's a damn sight more

1172:

As far as citations you seem to miss the whole point. I and others could care less for your claims about being knowledgable on the matter at hand if you're unable to substantiate said claims other with chest-thumping. I could claim that Von Braun is named after a lunar crater and there is not a

1094:

As for your examples - don't use articles you've worked on (which I will dismiss) or articles that haven't actually gotten manhandled by ignorant editors. Do you actually think everything on those HL2 articles is cited? Obviously, since you're trying to argue that the article is well-cited, you

721:

the sound of children laughing and playing, and there are the words "shantih shantih shantih" (a Hindi prayer) at the very end, after the credits. Except for a short sentence about the shantih thing, these elements appear nowhere else in the article. Show me how you would include them via edits.

1745:

If you'd like to see some alleged isolation of the Fallout community, I'd be happy to add that to the content that I've revived. I'll most likely link to examples of person(s) being treated poorly by those who disagree with the Fallout community, and I will likely be posting cashes of when the

531:

Well, the way I figure it, you could put it in there as long as its got that spoiler tag on it. If someone reads past the 'warning, this spoils shit' thing, and discovers it, its their problem. As for the second question, I don't know. I would guess that because anyone could watch the movie to

632:

I get what you're getting at with the MTG cards, and it's not strictly a bad idea (and is a very open-source way of looking at things). The problem...well, it's illustrated by your removal of the list at the Planeshift article. Someone, clearly, thought that those cards were notable enough to

1671:

Hi S... (do you really want to be called that??? ;-)), if you say it's from the Marathon game, I have to believe you; I don't know anything about such things, I'm afraid. The phrase is, however, poor Latin: manus is feminine (tribus, manus, porticus...), and the adjective then, should be

2421:

are still online, active and interested in helping the project. If you are no longer interested in the project all you need to do is...nothing! If you don't respond to this I'll take your name off the list and you'll never here from us again. If you're the proactive type you can

229:

I know, I've dealt with him before. What makes me mad personally is how he makes such changes to pages he has no knowledge of. What's more, with the Zeratul page, days ago I made a large overhaul to increase the quality of page, including making it in-universe, adding sources, etc.

780:? What you're describing is a more personal, more establish-your-credibility-based-on-the-quality-of-your-writing style, and that's E2's thing far more than it is WP's. E2 doesn't have NPOV, doesn't require references, and doesn't mandate writing style (other than "interesting"). 2312:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 881:

Excuse me? That was not vandalism. I reverted your edits because the cross-links are not needed. The titles have little in common other than the episode distictions. The only case where you would use cross-links is, for example, when have articles for the film called

704:

this information. Remember, many of the sections we're discussing are over 5 years old. If some of them weren't really Notable, wouldn't someone have already purged the Cards In Question from the Lists In Question? The answer is - of course - that they would have.

378: 1032:

than a rocket scientist, and other facts that were never flat-out stated because, unlike Wikipedians, the developers knew the player could put two and two together? Please provide an argument that actually convinces me that what I'm doing is wrong.

622:

I know its not the best fix to simply cite the game, but AMiB asked for me to cite sources, and I did to the best of my ability. I suppose I could have cited specific videos in the game... As for the Notable Card section... I guess I just disagree.

520:

part of the "movieworld," or should it be left out, as most reviewers consider it a part of the movie. Another question for you: why does the plot of a film not require citation? I know why, but cannot find a reference within WP to clarify it for

1716:

I never said turn based combat and isometric views are obsolete - I stated that these concepts have fallen into disuse among successful games. Looking back on it, I should have been clearer with that line, for those reasons you state: they

2455:(the table on the project page should take a few days to update) but we need to push to get the core articles in the project up to GA status. Thanks for all your help. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help the project along. 248:

Go do some research. The Blizzard devs were blabbermouths for years. There's probably plenty of critical reaction and developer conception to add to that article; it doesn't have to be 99% "I played the game and this is what happened!" -

1523:. If you have reliable sources for the statements I am challenging, please provide a link or a page number in a book that supports the claims; otherwise, the tags should stay until such time as the statements are sourced or are deleted. 937:

of the HL episodes as available as possible. Fortunately, I've made it so that Episode X searches go to a disambiguation page instead of simply going to the Star Wars movie links, so there's no need to revert Wookie's vandalism again.

1240:. And the source you can use is Knowledge (XXG). You're right - when in Rome do as the Romans do, and when it comes to a System Shock article, or a Doom 3 article, or an Afterlife article, or a Half-Life article... we're the Romans. 1633:

I saw the word "fixes" as relating to this viewpoint - a game mechanic is an opinion, not something that is subject to "fixing", as it is not broken unless coded incorrectly in relation to the original design. It can, however, be

476: 1050:. It is up to you to substantiate your claims, and not up to me to refute them. And yeah, unlike players, wikipedians do need proof and citations, that's what we have guidelines for. This is an encyclopedia, not a fan-site. 1537:

A link, or page number, for something the developers never cited because they knew their player base was intelligent enough to need not have everything spelled out for them? Hah! Tycho was right about Knowledge (XXG).

1580:

I was talking about the Doom3 article. Follow the first link. For that matter, while I haven't edited the System Shock 2 article, I am very familiar with the subject. But that's not the topic I was commenting on.

2711:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1551:. None of the statements in that sectino have reliable sources provided, which is especially important when discussing opinions. As for the Von Braun/System Shock 2 flap, I truly don't care, although adding 2437:

still interested in helping out the 40K project or otherwise still want to be listed there you can say so in response to this message on your talk page or on mine. Alternately you can add our new userbox

1629:

true that he does not take the view of those who call things "broken" seriously. I suspect this view is actually shared by most game designers, but I know Brad tends to be more vocal about it than others.

2286:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found 1803:

No problem on you editing my posts a little. My grammar and formating isn't perfect so I don't mind any changes as long as they don't alter the meaning of my post. Good on fixing some anonymous cowards

201:

that I did. Perhaps I should have just linked to your User Contribs instead of putting my own take on the situation, and for that I am a little sorry. I'm honored, though, that you think that something

2308:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

603:. If our policies are not followed by the bulk of a section of content, then editors may remove or consolidate that section unless it can be neutralized and attributed to a reliable source while avoid 1657:

for the purpose of helping people with game mechanics (as well as "other things", but that was the main objective). I don't think he would have done that if he didn't want people to know about them.

1095:

obviously don't. Of course, I'm not going to add the citing requests in the relevent sections, because the concept of using an un-cited article as if it's cited properly is just too damnably funny.

670:

needs the claims such as "notable" as it would be used in a card list to be cited. What you suggest boils down to Wiki acting as the arbiter of which cards are notable with the Project engaging in

2305:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

1078:

that the Von Braun is named for something. I've played System Shock 2. It's a space ship. The developers named it Von Braun. I can punch 'Von Braun' into Knowledge (XXG), and discover that until

946:

Again I'll state the Wookiepedian's edit were not vandalism. Please do not simply edit articles before a consensus in discussion is reached, keep talking; otherwise as you will be violating the

2667: 684:

Pfft. If doing as I propose is counter to Knowledge (XXG)'s polices and guildlines, it shows the failures of Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Remember, I see original research as

351:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any 2621:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1236:

as much as they don't want to admit it, will discover that the fans of the series are the ones who did the original research in the first place. We're not the ones who need to cite...

1287:

See, the thing is, if you won't, others will. Because generally people strive to improve the articles according to given standards. Just a matter of time. Good luck fighting that.

554:

is just mindboggling. Editors here follow Knowledge (XXG)'s policies, not their own made up ones. You are more than welcome to go elsewhere if you don't like the policies here. –

1728:

to the point of removing it entirely is simply uncalled for. Edit it to admit that these concepts have faltered in the face of differing ideas, fine, but removing it entirely?

497:

Those idiots are reverting your edits which are significant even though you correctly sourced them too. So I am moving one of the version of your edits on the tiberium page to

347:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2617:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

233:

But yeah, he rarely, if ever, listens to arguments against his edits, so I'm not worried. I'll rv him in a couple days and be done with it. There's no pleasing some people.

2138:

during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

2085:

during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

2032:

during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

2452: 2184: 1088:

developers didn't put down in a "This Game For Morons and Wikipedians" FAQ, allowing me to do what I've done to discover that the Von Braun was named after Von Braun!

2448:) to your userpage and I'll take that as a response. The userpage doesn't automatically include people in a category of members yet, but it might in the future. 564:

Fair enough; I had expected to be blocked for edit warring the previous night when AMiB and the other guy were. Hell, I suggested it. But I'll be cool from now on.

2610:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

2606:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 336:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 60: 1749:

Thanks for the feedback; I'm sure we can come to a mutually acceptable situation. If we don't, thats fine too - nothing on wikipedia can be deleted for long.

2201: 2021: 1449:

your posts in this discussion a couple years down the road (assming you are still editing), now that going to be a real insult. (Tansie didn't sign this -s)

2127: 1641:

I also moved the links to the references section, as I felt they broke up the text a little as inline links. Thanks for taking the time to research them!

1046:

Uh, in case you don't understand the wikipedia guidelines and rules of common sence let me break it down for you. You claim that Von Braun is named after

274:

If there's plenty of critical reaction, I'm sure you can find it fairly effectively. Of course, since the issue is really that there's a better source in

2442: 197:

I'm not 'poisoning any well', nor is it my intention to do so. All I've done is left messages for people that I fear would wind up experiencing the same

2283: 2074: 1965:

to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add

1875:

to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add

340:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see

1949:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 1859:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 2626: 2553: 2418: 2414: 2360: 2313: 2302: 2298: 2279: 1954: 1864: 1738:

as one of "your websites" leaded me to believe you were the owner. I apologize if pointing this out offended you or was misleading, but Wiki readers

471:

Hello, I'm a relatively new AMA member considering taking your case. It sounds like your difficulties involve a number of other articles besides the

356: 1153:

a fan site, because all the articles are written (and should be maintained) only by those who actually know what they are talking about - the fans.

1145:

And no, you didn't name the Lunar Crater. However, given that nobody wrote in the article says that the VB was named after the Lunar Crater, that's

1676:; however, that would make the phrase ambiguous, because celeris could go with dei as well. Any idea how "they" came up with the name? Greetings 1625:

making the suggestions. Realistically, it is likely that some people will not be satisfied with a game that is not exactly as they want it. It

1256:

you so strongly believe in your editing prowness then why not try to get this article peer-reviewed or better yet to get it to a higher class?

2317: 2645: 287:

Knowledge (XXG) is a compliation of facts that have been published. The opinion of every single person ever isn't needed as part of that. -

2736: 2119: 2066: 2013: 1934: 1844: 1141:

you think something is wrong, edit it or remove it. Someone who knows what he or she is doing will eventually come around and fix the mess.

842: 799: 648: 302: 264: 187: 134: 99: 1693:

Sounds like trivia to me from your description, but maybe you could make a /Triva link or something? Seems like it could be interesting.

17: 1930: 1840: 991: 2603: 2557: 2111: 2058: 2005: 1958: 1868: 110:

On the contrary, it is very appropriate to warn users of your deleting whole sections instead of trying to improve them yourself. --

1028:

Let me understand your argument - you want proof that a rocket-powered starship by the name of Von Braun was named after something

1597:

shouldn't be editing the article in the first place. Oh well, that's what you get when fools can mess with things they shouldn't.

1373:

cited, despite your belief about citing being a form of vandalizm. Reminds me of myself when I was 15, but hey, I could be wrong.

1343:

end. After all, the facts are only in dispute by those who don't know what they are editing. I think we can leave it at that, no?

84:

are not appropriate. Please do not warn off every user I come in contact with, especially when you aren't involved in any way. -

981: 2732: 1766: 1309:

and that does not back up any of its claims? Would you be inclined to believe anything wirtten in it? Just food for thought.

2545: 2489: 1926: 1836: 328:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 501:. When I checked in The C&C games I owned the information was CORRECT! So feel free to make an account and sign up. -- 2618: 2309: 985: 348: 2611: 2549: 1765:. It's the first Magic set article on wikipedia, and because you did such a fine job on it, it appears poised to survive 2723:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2123: 2070: 2017: 1938: 1848: 1002:

An understandable misconception... one that I've grown too fond of witnessing in my life, on the net and in real life.

438:, and currently gathering evidence of his bad behavior. Can you help me with links, diffs and so on. The page is here: 2728: 2598:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2371:

New material, including transwiki instructions and an organizational chart, has been added to the main project page.

890: 909:

wander into the Star Wars movie articles can find their way into something they could have been looking for - the

860:

I jumped to your user page from some edits you made on some Warhammer articles, and I must say, I quite like your

748:. I suspect that doing so wouldn't be against Knowledge (XXG)'s policies tho. I know, it's pretty much a cop-out. 2143: 2090: 2037: 1984: 1894: 172:

Oddly enough, I'm not thanking you for poisoning the well with every user I interact with. Don't do it again. -

2594: 1773: 1621:

While I do not disagree with the general thrust of your edit, I think that Brad's intent was not to demean the

1586: 1560: 1528: 1515:

Do not remove {{fact}} notices from articles without providing sources. All content on Knowledge (XXG) must be

838: 795: 770: 732: 697: 685: 674:. That's counter to Wiki's policies and guidelines, it's supposed to present the information, not create it. — 644: 551: 298: 260: 183: 130: 95: 2294: 2270: 2255: 1618:

your version of this article and thought I would explain why in a little more depth than the edit box allows.

16:

Hi. Great picture of your intermittent divergent squint! Can I use in a lecture at Royal Society of Medicine?

2126:). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 2073:). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 2020:). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 2526: 2118:

satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "

2065:

satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "

2012:

satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "

419:

I forgot to respond to this - thank you. It feels good that there's more than just me feeling the same way.

21: 1082:

changed it to go to a disambiguation page, the word Von Braun either was a spaceship in System Shock 2, or

1742:

be informed when it appears that someone is deleting content specifically to protect their own interests.

1057: 895: 480: 2724: 2561: 1962: 1872: 923: 2275: 2173: 1111:. Oh wait, that's an actual crater. You're saying because wikipedia had only two articles for the name 341: 1411:. And I'm dissapointed with the insult; I would have gone with a "hopeless loser and or nerd" insult. 1086:. Rocket ship named Von Braun, a guy who worked in rockets. I suspect I stumbled onto a fact that the 827:

Well, betting that things won't ever get cleaned up is generally a losing bet. It was just an idea. -

47:

I'm going to warn you that I'll delete it if its at the bottom, but I never really have the heart to.

2163: 2139: 2086: 2033: 1980: 1890: 583:

and the magic card pages, I've decided that I need to step in and comment. Please view the policy of

324: 2700: 2691: 475:

one. Could you identify a few other articles where you've experienced difficulties? Please reply on

2681: 2537: 2514: 2325: 1770: 1582: 1556: 1524: 913:

thing named Episode One/Two/Three. If there's no point in removing it, as you did, it's vandalism.

828: 785: 692:

the information that certain cards are notable. Nobody makes a research paper that proves that the

634: 612: 435: 406: 360: 288: 250: 234: 173: 120: 85: 2720: 2704: 2659: 1945:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

1855:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

1734:

Forgive me if I called you the owner of Duck N Cover - I took the mention of Duck N Cover on your

1731:

Calling Rosh infamous is hardly POV. He's a salient example of the topic you attempted to remove.

2485: 2205: 2188: 1969: 1879: 502: 439: 2404: 2348: 2339: 2029: 2009: 2001: 1995: 1929:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s

1908: 1839:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s

1818: 2571: 2522: 2460: 2384: 2244: 2158:

idea was that it would be an encyclopaedia, under the logo at the top left it says "the 💕".

1788: 1083: 960: 947: 928: 818:

don't have the requistite knowledge to do whatever pointless fix they would like to see done.

484: 2716: 2708: 2607: 2287: 1950: 1860: 1336:

anything that isn't correct would be removed quickly by those with the appropriate knowledge'

1203:. It's ok, I'll have a random TTLGer make the claim, and use it to cite the obvious for you. 588: 337: 1658: 1642: 2719:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2712: 2503: 2392: 2237: 2131: 2078: 2025: 1484:

Given that you seem to have nothing to say other than disrespect, I think we're done here.

604: 584: 56: 2634: 2159: 884: 2599: 1520: 671: 329: 1056:

edit: In case you haven't done so yet, please take a look at featured articles, such as

2671: 2502:

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

2321: 2282:

as to why its use in Knowledge (XXG) articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the

1856: 1805: 1651: 1374: 1310: 1288: 1257: 1225: 1174: 1131: 1065: 1019: 868: 609: 157: 64: 2261: 1516: 1217: 667: 333: 1917: 1827: 1166:

you claim then contact the former devs and ask them what the name is really based on.

1115:

it follows that the two are directly related? The logic astounds. Oh, and guess what.

555: 2477: 633:

include. You didn't. How would we resolve that issue if there was a disagreement? -

243:

Isn't in rather insulting to assume I know nothing about Starcraft? Give me a break.

2567: 2456: 2380: 2240: 2214: 1750: 1608: 1598: 1572: 1539: 1485: 1412: 1344: 1271: 1245: 1204: 1154: 1096: 1034: 1003: 938: 914: 819: 758: 749: 722: 706: 624: 565: 533: 522: 457: 420: 279: 207: 164: 2588: 700:, since only someone completely foreign to Magic would actually assume people are 595:

of card mechanisms; for example, explaining the storm ability would cite the card

1149:

clue to leave it to the ones who know what the VB was named for. Knowledge (XXG)

1677: 1061: 741: 675: 410: 393: 377: 278:

reaction, we simply see another problem with Knowledge (XXG)'s citing policies.

111: 156:

for explaining the situation to others. After all, an editor who realizes your

2630: 2532:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1946: 1735: 1703: 693: 144:

Even though I'm pretty sure you'll get upset by this line, it's too funny to

1886: 1832: 1792: 1183:

I'm not missing the point. The point you're missing is that the name is not

955: 951: 815: 811: 443: 2114:. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that 2061:. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that 2008:. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that 1270:

the article is of a sufficient class for a game overshadowed by Half-Life.

163:

is one less who won't violate 3RR trying to save the pages you purge, no?

2135: 2115: 2107: 2101: 1762: 1216:

What you're calling "critical thinking skills" wikipedia considers to be

894:. See what I mean? The actual titles aren't similar at all in your case. 580: 472: 402: 153: 2651: 2707:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2274:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under 2082: 2062: 2054: 2048: 1783: 1687: 950:

and starting an edit war. I agree with your changing the redirects for

737: 1769:

in spite of mild prejudice against such topics as "fancruft." Thanks.

2403: 2347: 2338: 2740: 2685: 2638: 2577: 2464: 2388: 2329: 2248: 2222: 2208: 2191: 2167: 2147: 2094: 2041: 1988: 1898: 1808: 1706: 1680: 1661: 1645: 1601: 1589: 1575: 1563: 1542: 1531: 1488: 1415: 1377: 1347: 1313: 1291: 1274: 1260: 1248: 1228: 1207: 1177: 1157: 1134: 1099: 1068: 1037: 1022: 1006: 996: 963: 941: 931: 917: 898: 871: 847: 822: 804: 761: 757:

Actually, it's already on the article - it's in the Themes section.

752: 725: 709: 696:

are notable. That happens naturally. I suppose this also tries into

678: 653: 627: 616: 568: 558: 536: 525: 505: 487: 460: 450: 423: 413: 363: 307: 282: 269: 237: 210: 192: 167: 139: 114: 104: 67: 39:

I know most people like it on the bottom, but I like it on the top.

25: 1197:

people either know, or people would be reading the article to learn

516:

of the latter). Should it be included in the synopsis, as it is an

1976: 1922: 1409:

would be the ones who would write an encyclopedia on that subject

1721:

exist, but they have not been quite as well received by users.

1712:

The trick is actually not to confirm what you're arguing against

1791:, where we're trying to make articles for every expansion set. 814:? The answer is, of course, because I know that the people who 2134:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

2081:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

2028:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

1338:. That's the glory of Knowledge (XXG). Regardless, time is on 810:

Why would I need to use E2, when much of what I do never gets

2658:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

1650:

Oh, and as for the obsfuscation - Brad asked me to setup the

777: 498: 2650: 2476: 2260: 1953:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 1907: 1863:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 1817: 1074:

See, this is the fundamental flaw in your argument. I'm not

2374:

Please help us get the Warhammer 40K project back on track!

2451:

We've assessed most of the articles in the project on the

2179:

You user name is inappropriate and offensive. I'll post a

1941:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 1851:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 1724:

But to deny that these concepts have fallen from grace so

1334:

Yes, I would believe a Knowledge (XXG) article, because '

61:

a matter that I feel will shape the future of the project

1933:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 1843:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 1238:

we're the ones who wrote the things that some need cited

2427: 2423: 2197: 2180: 1615: 1552: 1548: 1122: 1107:

I suppose I am also the one who named the lunar crater

81: 77: 2509:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2368:

Assessment tags have been added to the project banner.

736:

just slap it at the bottom of the plot synopsis, link

2185:

Knowledge (XXG):Usernames for administrator attention

2583:

Orphaned non-free media (File:Makron phase two.jpg)

2316:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 746:"its at the end of the film, and it's interesting." 2625:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 1130:Who exaclty made you the authority on the matter? 355:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 2699:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2110:, an article you created, has been nominated for 2057:, an article you created, has been nominated for 2004:, an article you created, has been nominated for 1925:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 1835:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 206:could do would cause people to turn against you. 148:use it: you should be going down on one knee and 59:I ask you to share your thoughts and opinions on 1199:. If you know the game as well as you claim, we 119:No, it's not, nor was that what he was doing. - 2556:can result in deletion without discussion, and 2202:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/User names 2022:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Sotha Sil 1555:renders the tone of the article unencyclpedic. 980:I happened across your name in a discussion at 688:, and this is a prime example of it. Nobody is 2128:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Numidium 1195:to understand connections and references that 456:Done, at least on most of my events with him. 2075:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Nerevar 1746:Fallout community overran Bethesda's forums. 8: 2303:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline 862:My beliefs about Knowledge (XXG) and editing 2666:redirect, you might want to participate in 2662:. Since you had some involvement with the 2413:This message is a test to check to see if 1511:Do not remove unsourced statement warnings 1126:unnecessasry because they seem obvious to 318:Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cybran.jpg) 2213:Fair enough. I'll think about it. Maybe. 375: 2268:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 1407:articles should be written by those who 550:You have been blocked for edit warring. 2521:notice, but please explain why in your 2473:Proposed deletion of Collapse (Deus Ex) 1921:template has been added to the article 1831:template has been added to the article 1547:You specifically removed the fact tags 434:Hello, I'm thinking of starting RfC on 31:Feel free to like... post stuff here. 1688:Putting Bungie Mythos into own article 812:modified to fit Knowledge (XXG) policy 591:; instead, it's best to cite cards as 7: 1638:, which is the word I used instead. 959:SW articles are simply unneccesary. 1201:would not be having this discussion 1189:reading the minds of the developers 982:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Citing sources 479:and/or feel free to drop a note on 2670:if you have not already done so. 2504:deleted for any of several reasons 2492:because of the following concern: 1787:too you may be interested to look 1767:Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion 733:Understand the Topic Or Don't Edit 698:Understand The Topic Or Don't Edit 332:. However, the image is currently 36:Post new stuff at the top, please. 14: 2725:review the candidates' statements 2443:User WikiProject Warhammer 40,000 2231:Centralized TV Episode Discussion 1939:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy 1849:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy 744:, and give the editing reason as 579:After looking at the issues with 2587: 2301:. Using one of the templates at 1711: 905:mile to ensure that someone who 599:, and suspend can be cited with 532:confirm it. But hell if I know. 376: 2124:Knowledge (XXG) deletion policy 2071:Knowledge (XXG) deletion policy 2018:Knowledge (XXG) deletion policy 2731:. For the Election committee, 2701:Arbitration Committee election 2692:ArbCom elections are now open! 2318:Media copyright questions page 467:Your advocacy request with AMA 1: 2741:12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2686:16:55, 24 November 2014 (UTC) 2612:our policy for non-free media 2361:Warhammer 40,000 project page 2335:Warhammer 40K Project updated 2284:boilerplate fair use template 2148:19:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2095:16:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2042:16:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 1989:02:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 1961:, where it may be deleted if 1899:02:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 1871:, where it may be deleted if 1799:Re: Editing my post and stuff 392:For fighting the good fight. 26:13:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC) 2627:criteria for speedy deletion 2453:Version 1.0 assessment scale 2330:16:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 2314:criteria for speedy deletion 2249:00:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 1681:21:24, 21 October 2005 (UTC) 872:22:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 357:criteria for speedy deletion 68:02:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 2727:and submit your choices on 2602:. However, it is currently 2560:allows discussion to reach 2465:21:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 2395:to all 40K project members. 2389:05:09, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 2223:04:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 2209:10:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 2192:10:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 2168:20:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 2120:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 2067:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 2014:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1935:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1845:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1602:02:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1590:02:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1576:02:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1564:02:33, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1543:02:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1532:20:31, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 1489:21:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1416:21:07, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1378:20:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1348:20:49, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1314:20:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1292:20:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1275:20:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1261:20:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1249:20:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1229:18:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1208:18:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1178:17:15, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1158:16:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1135:14:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1100:04:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1069:03:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1038:02:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1023:12:51, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 1007:20:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 997:19:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 964:01:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 942:00:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 932:00:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 918:21:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 899:21:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 816:request the things you wish 605:what Knowledge (XXG) is not 2756: 2733:MediaWiki message delivery 2295:the image description page 1753:01:51, May 11, 2005 (UTC) 1662:21:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 1646:21:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 537:04:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 526:03:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 506:07:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 488:02:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 461:17:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 451:21:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 414:19:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 2639:04:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC) 2595:File:Makron phase two.jpg 2578:06:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC) 2546:Proposed Deletion process 2428:talk to me and I'll do it 2297:and edit it to include a 2271:Image:Unhinged_poster.jpg 2256:Image:Unhinged_poster.jpg 1951:proposed deletion process 1861:proposed deletion process 1795:07:02, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1778:11:47, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC) 848:05:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 823:05:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 805:03:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 771:User:Scumbag/Scumpolicies 762:07:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 753:07:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 726:07:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 710:20:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 679:19:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 654:20:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 628:20:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 617:20:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 569:22:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 559:20:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 552:User:Scumbag/Scumpolicies 430:Gathering evidence on MiB 424:17:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 382: 2646:Redirects for discussion 2424:remove the name yourself 2280:explanation or rationale 2218: 1955:speedy deletion criteria 1865:speedy deletion criteria 1809:14:38, 12 May 2005 (UTC) 1707:20:40, 10 May 2005 (UTC) 1193:critical thinking skills 686:inevitable and valueable 364:03:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 308:05:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 283:18:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC) 270:20:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 238:02:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 211:23:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 193:20:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 168:19:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 140:22:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 115:16:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 105:05:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 2668:the redirect discussion 2644:Warthog Jump listed at 2554:Speedy Deletion process 2527:the article's talk page 2254:Fair use rationale for 1242:Obsequor, plebs plebis. 662:re:Citing notable cards 2655: 2497:Non-notable gamecruft. 2481: 2410: 2406:File:W40000 Symbol.png 2354: 2350:File:W40000 Symbol.png 2345: 2341:File:W40000 Symbol.png 2265: 2130:and please be sure to 2077:and please be sure to 2024:and please be sure to 1931:criteria for inclusion 1912: 1841:criteria for inclusion 1822: 1185:groundless speculation 1058:Shadow of the Colossus 976:Inappropriate username 888:and an episode called 864:section. Nicely said. 731:I have to abide by my 575:Knowledge (XXG) policy 511:Okay, Mister Tough Guy 499:The Encyclopedia Gamia 401:For your efforts with 55:Hello. As a member of 2705:Arbitration Committee 2654: 2592:Thanks for uploading 2558:Articles for Deletion 2490:proposed for deletion 2480: 2419:Warhammer 40K Project 2409: 2353: 2344: 2264: 1959:Articles for Deletion 1957:or it can be sent to 1911: 1869:Articles for Deletion 1867:or it can be sent to 1821: 1614:Hi there, Scumbag! I 386:The Original Barnstar 322:Thanks for uploading 152:my surprisingly-firm 2200:with suggestion of: 776:Have you considered 51:The Future of WP:40k 2709:arbitration process 2608:You may add it back 436:User:A Man In Black 407:User:A Man In Black 342:our fair use policy 338:You may add it back 2721:arbitration policy 2656: 2550:deletion processes 2486:Collapse (Deus Ex) 2482: 2411: 2355: 2346: 2299:fair use rationale 2266: 2132:sign your comments 2100:AfD nomination of 2079:sign your comments 2047:AfD nomination of 2026:sign your comments 1994:AfD nomination of 1913: 1823: 1781:Now, that you did 1090:. Give me a break. 877:Star Wars episodes 867:See you around! -- 440:User:Grue/workshop 44:Post it on the top 2600:claim of fair use 2575: 2396: 2393:Auto Wiki Browser 2364:has been updated! 1927:proposed deletion 1918:proposed deletion 1837:proposed deletion 1828:proposed deletion 1697:Fallout Community 1218:original research 1084:Wernher von Braun 948:three revert rule 896:The Wookieepedian 846: 803: 652: 399: 398: 330:claim of fair use 306: 268: 191: 138: 103: 2747: 2678: 2619:my contributions 2591: 2566: 2543: 2542: 2536: 2520: 2519: 2513: 2447: 2441: 2407: 2400:Project activity 2379: 2351: 2342: 2310:my contributions 2278:but there is no 2153:Re:Dumb Question 1974: 1968: 1944: 1884: 1878: 1854: 1776: 1521:reliable sources 994: 988: 836: 834: 793: 791: 642: 640: 448: 380: 373: 372: 349:my contributions 325:Image:Cybran.jpg 296: 294: 258: 256: 181: 179: 128: 126: 93: 91: 2755: 2754: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2729:the voting page 2695: 2672: 2649: 2585: 2576: 2540: 2534: 2533: 2517: 2511: 2510: 2475: 2445: 2439: 2405: 2402: 2377: 2349: 2340: 2337: 2259: 2233: 2204:. Up to you. -- 2177: 2155: 2140:Judgesurreal777 2105: 2087:Judgesurreal777 2052: 2034:Judgesurreal777 1999: 1981:Judgesurreal777 1972: 1966: 1942: 1906: 1891:Judgesurreal777 1882: 1876: 1852: 1816: 1801: 1774: 1759: 1714: 1699: 1691: 1669: 1667:manus celer dei 1612: 1513: 1015: 992: 986: 978: 879: 858: 830: 787: 784:entertaining - 774: 718: 716:Children of Men 664: 636: 577: 548: 513: 495: 469: 444: 432: 371: 320: 290: 252: 227: 175: 122: 87: 75: 53: 12: 11: 5: 2753: 2751: 2698: 2694: 2689: 2648: 2642: 2584: 2581: 2565: 2564:for deletion. 2544:will stop the 2500: 2499: 2474: 2471: 2469: 2401: 2398: 2376: 2375: 2372: 2369: 2356: 2336: 2333: 2258: 2252: 2232: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2176: 2171: 2154: 2151: 2104: 2098: 2051: 2045: 1998: 1992: 1975:to the top of 1943:{{dated prod}} 1905: 1902: 1885:to the top of 1853:{{dated prod}} 1815: 1812: 1800: 1797: 1758: 1755: 1713: 1710: 1698: 1695: 1690: 1684: 1668: 1665: 1611: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1583:Captainktainer 1568: 1567: 1566: 1557:Captainktainer 1525:Captainktainer 1512: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1264: 1263: 1252: 1251: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1211: 1210: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1143: 1142: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1092: 1091: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1041: 1040: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1009: 977: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 878: 875: 857: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 773: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 717: 714: 713: 712: 666:Unfortunately 663: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 576: 573: 572: 571: 547: 544: 542: 540: 539: 512: 509: 494: 493:Tiberium Edits 491: 468: 465: 464: 463: 431: 428: 427: 426: 397: 396: 389: 388: 383: 381: 370: 367: 361:BetacommandBot 319: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 245: 244: 235:The Clawed One 226: 223: 222: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 199:unpleasantness 158:modus operandi 74: 71: 52: 49: 30: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2752: 2743: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2693: 2690: 2688: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2677: 2676: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2653: 2647: 2643: 2641: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2629:. Thank you. 2628: 2624: 2620: 2615: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2596: 2590: 2582: 2580: 2579: 2573: 2569: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2539: 2530: 2528: 2524: 2516: 2507: 2505: 2498: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2491: 2487: 2479: 2472: 2470: 2467: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2449: 2444: 2436: 2431: 2429: 2425: 2420: 2416: 2408: 2399: 2397: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2373: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2362: 2359: 2352: 2343: 2334: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2320:. Thank you. 2319: 2315: 2311: 2306: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2293:Please go to 2291: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2272: 2263: 2257: 2253: 2251: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2230: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2207: 2206:Jack Merridew 2203: 2199: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2190: 2189:Jack Merridew 2186: 2182: 2175: 2172: 2170: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2152: 2150: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2103: 2099: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2050: 2046: 2044: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1997: 1993: 1991: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1971: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1947:its talk page 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1910: 1903: 1901: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1881: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1857:its talk page 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1829: 1820: 1813: 1811: 1810: 1807: 1798: 1796: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1779: 1777: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1761:Nice work on 1756: 1754: 1752: 1747: 1743: 1741: 1737: 1732: 1729: 1727: 1722: 1720: 1709: 1708: 1705: 1696: 1694: 1689: 1685: 1683: 1682: 1679: 1675: 1666: 1664: 1663: 1660: 1656: 1653: 1648: 1647: 1644: 1639: 1637: 1631: 1628: 1624: 1619: 1617: 1610: 1607: 1603: 1600: 1595: 1591: 1588: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1574: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1541: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1510: 1490: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1417: 1414: 1410: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1379: 1376: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1349: 1346: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1315: 1312: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1293: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1276: 1273: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1262: 1259: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1234: 1230: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1133: 1129: 1124: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1098: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1039: 1036: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1021: 1013:SS2 Citations 1012: 1008: 1005: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 995: 989: 983: 975: 965: 962: 957: 953: 949: 945: 944: 943: 940: 935: 934: 933: 930: 925: 922:Actually, as 921: 920: 919: 916: 912: 908: 903: 902: 901: 900: 897: 893: 892: 887: 886: 876: 874: 873: 870: 865: 863: 855: 849: 844: 840: 835: 833: 826: 825: 824: 821: 817: 813: 809: 808: 807: 806: 801: 797: 792: 790: 781: 779: 772: 769: 763: 760: 756: 755: 754: 751: 747: 743: 739: 734: 730: 729: 728: 727: 724: 715: 711: 708: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 682: 681: 680: 677: 673: 669: 661: 655: 650: 646: 641: 639: 631: 630: 629: 626: 621: 620: 619: 618: 615: 614: 611: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 574: 570: 567: 563: 562: 561: 560: 557: 553: 545: 543: 538: 535: 530: 529: 528: 527: 524: 519: 510: 508: 507: 504: 503:Cs california 500: 492: 490: 489: 486: 482: 478: 477:the case page 474: 466: 462: 459: 455: 454: 453: 452: 449: 447: 441: 437: 429: 425: 422: 418: 417: 416: 415: 412: 408: 404: 395: 391: 390: 387: 384: 379: 374: 368: 366: 365: 362: 359:. Thank you. 358: 354: 350: 345: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 317: 309: 304: 300: 295: 293: 286: 285: 284: 281: 277: 273: 272: 271: 266: 262: 257: 255: 247: 246: 242: 241: 240: 239: 236: 231: 224: 212: 209: 205: 200: 196: 195: 194: 189: 185: 180: 178: 171: 170: 169: 166: 162: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 142: 141: 136: 132: 127: 125: 118: 117: 116: 113: 109: 108: 107: 106: 101: 97: 92: 90: 83: 79: 72: 70: 69: 66: 62: 58: 50: 48: 46: 45: 40: 38: 37: 32: 28: 27: 23: 19: 18:185.58.166.44 2696: 2674: 2673: 2664:Warthog Jump 2663: 2660:Warthog Jump 2657: 2622: 2616: 2593: 2586: 2552:exist. The 2548:, but other 2531: 2523:edit summary 2508: 2501: 2496: 2484:The article 2483: 2468: 2450: 2434: 2432: 2412: 2378: 2363: 2357: 2307: 2292: 2269: 2267: 2234: 2178: 2156: 2106: 2053: 2000: 1916: 1914: 1826: 1824: 1804:vandalism.-- 1802: 1782: 1780: 1760: 1748: 1744: 1739: 1733: 1730: 1725: 1723: 1718: 1715: 1700: 1692: 1673: 1670: 1655:specifically 1654: 1649: 1640: 1635: 1632: 1626: 1622: 1620: 1613: 1609:Brad Wardell 1514: 1408: 1339: 1335: 1241: 1237: 1221: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1191:- I'm using 1188: 1184: 1171: 1150: 1146: 1144: 1127: 1120: 1112: 1108: 1093: 1087: 1079: 1075: 1055: 1047: 1029: 1016: 979: 961:The Filmaker 929:The Filmaker 924:WP:VANDALISM 910: 906: 889: 883: 880: 866: 861: 859: 831: 788: 782: 775: 745: 719: 701: 689: 665: 637: 608: 600: 596: 592: 578: 549: 541: 517: 514: 496: 485:Shirahadasha 481:my talk page 470: 445: 433: 400: 385: 352: 346: 323: 321: 291: 275: 253: 232: 228: 225:AMiB - Reply 203: 198: 176: 160: 149: 145: 123: 88: 76: 63:. Thanks. -- 54: 43: 42: 41: 35: 34: 33: 29: 15: 2174:WP:USERNAME 1659:GreenReaper 1652:GalCiv Wiki 1643:GreenReaper 1187:, nor am I 1062:Half-Life 2 856:Nicely said 778:Everything2 742:inner peace 601:lotus bloom 597:brainfreeze 585:attribution 2717:topic bans 2538:dated prod 2515:dated prod 2391:Sent with 2160:Jackaranga 2122:" and the 2069:" and the 2016:" and the 694:Power Nine 518:observable 483:. Best, -- 2713:site bans 2675:Steel1943 2562:consensus 2488:has been 2322:Rettetast 2030:Sotha Sil 2010:Sotha Sil 2002:Sotha Sil 1996:Sotha Sil 1970:db-author 1963:consensus 1887:Almalexia 1880:db-author 1873:consensus 1833:Almalexia 1814:Almalexia 1806:Lord Yaar 1771:Cool Hand 1736:user page 1553:obviously 1375:Tani unit 1311:Tani unit 1289:Tani unit 1258:Tani unit 1226:Tani unit 1175:Tani unit 1132:Tani unit 1113:Von Braun 1109:Von Braun 1066:Tani unit 1048:something 1020:Tani unit 956:Episode 2 952:Episode 1 869:Falcorian 829:A Man In 786:A Man In 635:A Man In 369:Barnstar! 289:A Man In 251:A Man In 174:A Man In 121:A Man In 86:A Man In 65:Falcorian 2623:articles 2604:orphaned 2276:fair use 2198:declined 2136:Numidium 2116:Numidium 2112:deletion 2108:Numidium 2102:Numidium 2059:deletion 2006:deletion 1763:Unhinged 1757:Unhinged 1517:verified 1076:claiming 891:Serenity 885:Serenity 843:past ops 839:conspire 800:past ops 796:conspire 702:creating 690:creating 649:past ops 645:conspire 593:examples 581:Tiberium 473:Tiberium 403:Tiberium 353:articles 334:orphaned 303:past ops 299:conspire 265:past ops 261:conspire 188:past ops 184:conspire 154:rear end 150:thanking 135:past ops 131:conspire 100:past ops 96:conspire 2568:ZXCVBNM 2457:Protonk 2433:If you 2417:of the 2415:members 2381:Protonk 2241:Maniwar 2215:Scumbag 2083:Nerevar 2063:Nerevar 2055:Nerevar 2049:Nerevar 1784:Unglued 1751:Scumbag 1636:changed 1599:Scumbag 1573:Scumbag 1540:Scumbag 1486:Scumbag 1413:Scumbag 1345:Scumbag 1272:Scumbag 1246:Scumbag 1205:Scumbag 1155:Scumbag 1097:Scumbag 1035:Scumbag 1004:Scumbag 939:Scumbag 915:Scumbag 820:Scumbag 759:Scumbag 750:Scumbag 738:shantih 723:Arcayne 707:Scumbag 625:Scumbag 610:Deckill 566:Scumbag 546:Blocked 534:Scumbag 523:Arcayne 458:Scumbag 421:Scumbag 280:Scumbag 208:Scumbag 165:Scumbag 2703:. The 2525:or on 1937:" and 1847:" and 1740:should 1726:deeply 1678:T.a.k. 1623:people 1616:edited 676:J Greb 411:GeeCee 394:GeeCee 112:Mjrmtg 73:Enough 57:WP:40K 2631:BJBot 1977:Vivec 1923:Vivec 1904:Vivec 1704:Ausir 1672:celer 1123:added 1030:other 987:LotLE 911:other 832:Bl♟ck 789:Bl♟ck 672:WP:OR 638:Bl♟ck 556:Steel 446:Grue 292:Bl♟ck 254:Bl♟ck 177:Bl♟ck 161:early 124:Bl♟ck 89:Bl♟ck 2737:talk 2682:talk 2635:talk 2572:TALK 2461:talk 2430:. 2385:talk 2358:The 2326:talk 2288:here 2245:talk 2239:. -- 2219:talk 2187:. -- 2181:note 2164:talk 2144:talk 2091:talk 2038:talk 1985:talk 1895:talk 1793:Grue 1789:here 1775:Luke 1686:Re: 1587:Talk 1561:Talk 1549:here 1529:Talk 1244:j/k 1147:your 1128:you? 993:talk 954:and 668:WP:V 607:. — 405:and 82:this 80:and 78:This 22:talk 2697:Hi, 2614:). 2435:are 2426:or 2183:at 1979:. 1889:. 1519:by 1080:you 1060:or 907:did 740:to 589:POV 521:me. 344:). 276:fan 146:not 2739:) 2715:, 2684:) 2637:) 2541:}} 2535:{{ 2529:. 2518:}} 2512:{{ 2506:. 2463:) 2446:}} 2440:{{ 2387:) 2328:) 2290:. 2247:) 2221:) 2166:) 2146:) 2093:) 2040:) 1987:) 1973:}} 1967:{{ 1915:A 1897:) 1883:}} 1877:{{ 1825:A 1719:do 1674:is 1627:is 1585:* 1559:* 1527:* 1340:my 1222:me 1151:is 1121:I 841:| 798:| 647:| 613:er 442:. 409:. 301:| 263:| 186:| 133:| 98:| 24:) 2735:( 2680:( 2633:( 2574:) 2570:( 2459:( 2438:( 2383:( 2324:( 2243:( 2217:( 2162:( 2142:( 2089:( 2036:( 1983:( 1893:( 990:× 845:) 837:( 802:) 794:( 651:) 643:( 305:) 297:( 267:) 259:( 204:I 190:) 182:( 137:) 129:( 102:) 94:( 20:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index