497:
expert opinion on it. Knowledge (XXG) is not owned by the two of you CliffC and
Ohnoitsjamie. Use of the talkpage was only pointed out after I was banned from editing. And Yes I do endorse the third world clinics especially Sri Lanka as I have had FUE hairtransplant work done there and it was excellent. They are cheaper than in the west by about x10 and do a lot of research that is over looked here. But more importantly on a personal level I was turned away from FUE in preferance of Strip surgery by 3 leading western clinic because of the so called fox test which is only there for the convenience of clinics not the client. I can see no reason why the mention of specific manufacturers of mechanised FUE machines such as neograft recur in these pages (see stub on FUE) without you lot removing it. Conflict of interest anyone?
425:
comment otherwise ensure that you educate yourselves about it before passing judgement. Feel free to ask questions. Also I have made other edits to the text as it is clearly written by people who have a limited understanding of the topic of hair transplants and most if not all the content is without citation. Additionally the stub linking to the section on FUE mentions neograft which is blatant product placement if I ever so an example of it. I would suggest that you proof read these too.
361:
removal of FUE grafts. The basis is economics. I assume that because the research came from Sri Lanka it was removed. My final edit made no mention of Sri Lanka or a source of the information and only the need for reconsidering the fox biopsy. I believe that this administrator has a vested interest in this subject and does not wish to further the debate. The administrator who blocked me should have their priviledges revoked.
123:
275:
160:
23:
220:
529:
118:
easiest cases for FUE. FUT has many draw backs and therefore people should be allowed a choice. There is published data from Sri Lanka to show that with enough training and a strict extraction protocol it is possible to perform FUE on all clients. This is vital information and should be included. Thanks for removing the neograft insert.
476:"It take about 4.5 months for the hair to start to grow after a hair transplant. Also £30000 is way too much to pay for surgery. In some places it costs as low as $ 1.5 a graft and thats for the newer FUE not what looks like FUT done here. Try Sri Lanka for instance. I know as Ive had it done there and the results are excellent."
496:
Perhaps instead of acting like bullies and threatening banning and getting peoples back up you lot should explain where any issue should be raised on this forum if it is to be debated. I think it is rude to just remove anothers comments especially if you are not infromed about the subject and hold no
428:
I assume that because the research came from Sri Lanka it was removed. My final edit made no mention of Sri Lanka or a source of the information and only the need for reconsidering the fox biopsy. I believe that this administrator has a vested interest in this subject and does not wish to further the
424:
The debate over FUE vs FUT is an important one. The fox biopsy is at the heart of the issue as many western clinics turn clients away on the basis of the ease of removal of FUE grafts. The basis is economics as it is both time consuming and technically difficult. If you are aware of the topic please
117:
The paragraph mentions Sri Lanka only. There are many clinics there and does not specifically mention any single one. The fox biopsy is a process of selecting people for FUE based on ease of extraction. This benefits the clinics only as they are able to do many more surgeries if they select only the
360:
The entire article save for a few lines is unsourced. My edit was removed on the basis that it is unsourced. This in its self is unfair. The debate over FUE vs FUT is an important one. The fox biopsy is at the heart of the issue as many western clinics turn clients away on the basis of the ease of
550:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
93:? I agree with you on Neograft, it is unsourced and doesn't belong for that reason, so I have removed the entire unsourced paragraph, both Neograft and the Sri Lanka clinic. Do not reinstate any of it without citing a
60:
Stop advertising
Neograft there are many other manufacturers of such equipment. These articles are meant to be non biased and free from soapboxing, promotion or advertising. You will be banned if you continue
372:
You were given sufficient warning about the consequences of your actions, but still persisted. Instead, you should have discussed the matter on the article's talk page to gain consensus. —
155:
If it is correct to remove all unsourced material this entire article except for a few lines must be deleted. You must do so the next time you remove the referance to the fox biopsy test.
194:
I assume you work for the pro FUT hair transplant lobby. If freedom of speach is an issue for you look elsewhere than wikipedia. You should be ashamed of your self.
315:
414:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
254:
89:
Do you look at the results of your edits? Why are you continuing to add promotional mention of a hair clinic in Sri Lanka, a subject first removed
445:
310:
77:
470:
399:
31:
234:
546:
461:
without strong evidence. The editor you accuse of a COI has contributed tens of thousands of edits across hundreds of subject areas.
250:
385:
547:
246:
329:
288:
238:
228:
173:
135:
40:
282:
127:
287:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
131:
503:
If you continue to make unfounded and ridiculous accusations, you will be blocked for a longer period of time.
471:
So was it worth the trouble (and the £30,000) Gordon? Ramsay doesn't look too different after hair transplant
566:
473:, where someone who signs as "sam jones, newcastle, England" endorses FUE and the Sri Lankan hair industry:
437:
293:
69:
537:
433:
65:
511:
265:
210:
186:
146:
533:
168:
381:
202:, you'll realize that is a ridiculous accusation. And you are blocked for ignoring repeated warnings.
465:
have contributed 15 edits, on a single subject. That's not counting the first reader comment at the
35:
556:
505:
259:
204:
180:
140:
242:
486:
408:
373:
102:
50:
458:
231:
from editing
Knowledge (XXG) for a period of 31 hours as a result of your disruptive edits.
199:
233:
You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that
94:
552:
574:
560:
544:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
514:
490:
389:
268:
213:
189:
149:
106:
54:
482:
98:
46:
429:
debate. The administrator who blocked me should have their priviledges revoked.
219:
541:
536:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
249:; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning
273:
218:
32:
use
Knowledge (XXG) for soapboxing, promotion or advertising
396:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
532:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
416:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
481:
This editor has an agenda and I endorse this block. --
343:
339:
333:
324:
320:
306:
302:
298:
90:
130:
content. This contravenes
Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on
281:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
245:, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations,
421:Right then please provide a consensus opinion.
8:
457:- please don't accuse other editors of a
237:(including page blanking or addition of
134:. If you continue to do so, you may be
7:
176:from editing without further notice
14:
545:
527:
158:
121:
21:
565:Thanks will do so in future. --
138:from editing Knowledge (XXG).
1:
575:17:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
561:17:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
515:16:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
255:biographies of living persons
491:13:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
455:Comment to Samjonesnewcastle
390:06:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
269:02:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
214:02:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
190:01:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
171:Knowledge (XXG), you may be
150:17:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
107:02:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
55:19:12, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
285:, who declined the request.
590:
400:guide to appealing blocks
570:
257:will not be tolerated.
278:
223:
43:without further notice
330:change block settings
277:
251:neutral point of view
222:
34:again, as you did at
459:conflict of interest
167:; the next time you
41:blocked from editing
36:Hair transplantation
279:
224:
198:If you look at my
126:Please do not add
70:Samjonesnewcastle
567:Samjonesnewcastle
523:Your recent edits
450:
438:Samjonesnewcastle
436:comment added by
294:Samjonesnewcastle
82:
68:comment added by
581:
549:
531:
530:
509:
449:
430:
413:
407:
378:
349:
347:
336:
318:
316:deleted contribs
276:
263:
247:personal attacks
208:
184:
162:
161:
144:
125:
124:
81:
62:
25:
24:
589:
588:
584:
583:
582:
580:
579:
578:
540:by typing four
538:sign your posts
528:
525:
507:
431:
419:
411:
405:
404:, then use the
393:
374:
363:
337:
327:
313:
296:
289:blocking policy
274:
261:
227:You have been
206:
182:
159:
142:
122:
95:reliable source
63:
22:
19:
12:
11:
5:
587:
585:
524:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
494:
493:
479:
478:
477:
394:
370:
366:Decline reason
358:
354:Request reason
351:
272:
217:
216:
154:
114:
112:
111:
110:
109:
84:
83:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
586:
577:
576:
572:
568:
563:
562:
558:
554:
548:
543:
539:
535:
522:
516:
513:
512:
510:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
492:
488:
484:
480:
475:
474:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
452:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
426:
422:
418:
417:
410:
403:
401:
392:
391:
387:
383:
379:
377:
369:
367:
362:
357:
355:
350:
345:
341:
335:
331:
326:
322:
317:
312:
308:
307:global blocks
304:
303:active blocks
300:
295:
290:
286:
284:
283:administrator
271:
270:
267:
266:
264:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
230:
221:
215:
212:
211:
209:
201:
197:
196:
195:
192:
191:
188:
187:
185:
177:
175:
170:
166:
163:This is your
156:
152:
151:
148:
147:
145:
137:
133:
132:verifiability
129:
119:
115:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
87:
86:
85:
79:
75:
71:
67:
59:
58:
57:
56:
52:
48:
44:
42:
38:, you may be
37:
33:
29:
26:This is your
17:February 2011
16:
564:
526:
504:
495:
466:
462:
454:
441:
432:— Preceding
427:
423:
420:
415:
397:
395:
376:Tivedshambo
375:
371:
365:
364:
359:
353:
352:
325:creation log
292:
280:
258:
226:
225:
203:
200:edit history
193:
179:
172:
165:last warning
164:
157:
153:
139:
120:
116:
113:
73:
64:— Preceding
39:
28:only warning
27:
20:
239:random text
534:talk pages
467:Daily Mail
321:filter log
398:read the
340:checkuser
299:block log
235:vandalism
169:vandalize
128:unsourced
30:; if you
508:itsJamie
469:article
446:contribs
434:unsigned
311:contribs
262:itsJamie
207:itsJamie
183:itsJamie
143:itsJamie
78:contribs
66:unsigned
553:SineBot
409:unblock
334:unblock
229:blocked
174:blocked
136:blocked
542:tildes
483:CliffC
99:CliffC
47:CliffC
402:first
61:thus.
571:talk
557:talk
506:OhNo
487:talk
442:talk
260:OhNo
253:and
243:spam
205:OhNo
181:OhNo
141:OhNo
103:talk
97:. --
91:here
74:talk
51:talk
463:You
344:log
291:).
241:),
178:.
45:.
573:)
559:)
551:--
489:)
448:)
444:•
412:}}
406:{{
388:)
368::
356::
338:•
332:•
328:•
323:•
319:•
314:•
309:•
305:•
301:•
105:)
80:)
76:•
53:)
569:(
555:(
485:(
440:(
386:c
384:/
382:t
380:(
348:)
346:)
342:(
297:(
101:(
72:(
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.