1792:
1727:
1662:
1597:
1532:
1467:
1363:"a page unto itself". :-D That's not what I meant but I can see how it was interpreted that way. I meant that in the McConaughey example the behind-the-camera credits on a film are included in the *Film* Notes field. Sometime in the future, when her history becomes extensive, I predict an editor will merge her *Other works* credits regarding films with the *Film* section. Ciao!
1093:
1020:
645:'s body of work that includes film, TV and video games is in a section called "filmography". But they ain't all films! I preferred your edit. It looked much tidier, in my opinion. The only error was having "films" as the table header. Aside from that, I think it was fine. I think the word "filmography" is misused in numerous articles.
267:
This is not the first time you have been asked not to instill your own ideas on filmography tables (as witnessed in above section). There are standards for a reason, please use them. The new heading code is much simplified, hiding the hard-code markup from editors. And again, blue is the preferred color. Please see
615:
tables, and I put forward a suggestion for including a "medium" column in the general filmography, which could serve the purpose of presenting the credits in chronological order, but which could be made sortable and therefore allow TV or film credits to be looked at individually. The discussion is at
324:
I did wonder why no one responded (though that might just be because I just figured out how to use those :'s)! I'm not sure, though - I think it looks better with something to differentiate the headers from the titles, etc., and having the years, etc. all separated when some are the same (like: 1991,
1822:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
1757:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
1692:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
1627:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
1562:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
1497:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
943:
Hi -- thanks for the recent improvements to the filmography table on Colin's biography. Looks good and your peers approve! Can I find out from you the evidence that Colin played John Leary in 2009 Nan's
Christmas Carol? Is this only from IMDB or do you have personal or other conclusive facts to back
449:
noticed I had a new message, I didn't do it on purpose. I decided to stop editing filmographies, it seems to be a lot more complicated than I thought and I don't want to cause trouble. :) Thanks for taking the time to correct me, and I like your name (sounds vaguely familiar). ♪Your
Opheliac♫ 08:02,
1235:
correctly. And you're still removing "Episode(s):" from the 'Notes column without consensus. Please at least properly learn the first two MOS guidelines when applying your edits, and please consider halting the latter practice to save the rest of editors a lot of extra work having to clean up after
507:
I do review before saving. The message bar tends to blend in for me, though; apparently I'm not too observant, heh. I've actually never read Lord of the Flies (though I've heard of it, of course), but I did just read the part on Jack
Merridew - he sounds a bit brutal! ♪Your Opheliac♫ 18:12, 31 July
469:
I saw that the posts were only four minutes apart. I've certainly hit save and then seen a message bar; it shows that you were reviewing the edit before saving. I'd not seen your edit when making the above post; I'm sure I took more than four minutes on it. This area has been a bit contentious, but
298:
Oh, I'm sorry =\ I didn't know I was doing that - I just thought it was kind of a case of "pick the one you like best", though I did try to use the one I thought was more 'recent'. I'm confused now though; is the above right, or did I miss something..? I did read through the links, but I think Jack
161:
says that red links are fine. Basically, you're creating the link so that once there is an article, it automatically becomes a blue link. If you don't link it, and an article is eventually created, then the creator of that article has to go around to each article that could conceivably link to it
594:
I notice you've been adding sortable film tables, and I thought you may be interested in this. By adding a sort key, you can sort titles to avoid sorting by "A", "An" or "The". By also adding a "no link" to those that titles that are not linked, you can also sort the title without creating a red
266:
It is not clear why you are reverting the coding on tables to older versions, and changing the heading color. Some of what the code you are using is very outdated, from several versions prior, and you are only setting
Knowledge (XXG) backwards. The blue heading has been preferred for some time.
111:
Hello! I noticed that you're doing quite a bit of work on filmographies. I felt that I should point out a couple things to you. First, filmographies (or any list of works) should be in reverse chronological order. Therefore, 2009 would be at the bottom and not the top. Second, using "XXXX in
798:
If you look at the diff, it appears that under 2001, "Web Girl" changes to "Virtually Casey"; "Work" changes to "Worked"; 14 episodes (2002-2003) changes to 15; "Jackie Chan
Adventures" changes to "Teen Titans" and "Everwood" changes to "The Robinsons: Lost in Space". Did you mean to make those
614:
Well thank you. I try to be the friendly sort. To answer your question, there's no rule and there's nothing to even suggest that one format is used more often than an other. There's a discussion you may be interested in reading, and commenting on which started about the use of seperate awards
411:
page to use more rowspans; on things like "TV movies". This is a major impediment to accessibility and I'm asking you to cease the practice, immediately. Ultimately, this is all going to have to be reworked and I hope the above example is enough to convince you that this is not a matter of mere
923:
if that subject interests you. We hope this channel can serve as a safe haven to hang out, talk about Wiki, brainstorming, increasing women's participation in
Wikimedia, article alerts and foster friendships. I hope you join us! (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there!
1266:
536:. I just looked at RexxS' page, and was very surprised to find myself mentioned over there! I don't know if you still look at my talk page, but I don't "love" rowspans, inappropiate or otherwise, and I did try to do it correctly. ♪Your Opheliac♫ 00:16, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
700:
303:
Hi. I missed the above reply. You would be best off listening to me on this issue. Teh blue is non-standard and really only a fistful of folks ever pushed for it. I'm cleaning up all sort of messes in filmographies and welcome your help. I just
1341:
Thank you for restoring the above-referenced credits. I think the McConaughey example reduces page usage but ... nevertheless ... it's important to provide Ms. Barrell's film history both in front of and behind the camera. :-)
1390:
299:
there is telling me that it's not been agreed upon?? I didn't know filmography tables could be so complicated, heh. Is there anyone I could ask about the questions I have? ♪Your
Opheliac♫ 15:33, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
845:, they only changed because they were no longer listed with rowspans - otherwise they're still the same. And it's 15 episodes on Everwood instead of 14 because I didn't list the episode from 2004 separately.
182:
Yet another thing. Please don't add episode names in the same line as television show titles. This content belongs in the "Notes" section, in quote marks, not in the title. There is a standard format at
1559:
1223:
I just figured out / remembered how to respond to these... hopefully I'm doing it right. Anyway, thank you! :) These things change so often it's hard to keep up. I'll do better in the future, though!
667:
I forgot to mention that the rowspans broke the sortability. Even if the other editor doesn't personally like the tables to be merged, the removal of rowspans was an improvement in terms of
362:, you can now click the little controls in the header to sort by, say, title. Sorting flat-out requires that all the years be there. Imaging a person with a vision disability who uses a
201:
Hello. While your creation of filmography tables is appreciated, please note that items in the "Notes" section are not followed by periods. It is not a sentence. For example, in
616:
241:
1818:
1689:
1494:
1117:
1826:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
1806:
1761:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
1753:
1741:
1696:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
1678:
1631:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
1613:
1566:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
1548:
1501:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
1483:
1624:
244:
regarding changes. Please use the current guidelines/coding for filmographies if you want to update tables or create new ones, which is very simplified:
620:
263:{| border="2" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" |- bgcolor="#CCCCCC" align="center" |- bgcolor="#CCCCCC" align="center" ! Year ! Title ! Role ! Notes |-
1198:
as well...) Also, your removal of the "Episode:" from
Filmography 'Notes' column will be considered controversial by some (and is not necessary under
340:
I just forgot about this thread. I see you've less then 600 edits in the last year and a half... while I've made more than that in the last ten days.
1357:
You're welcome! :) Her
Filmography isn't as extensive as the above-named actors, so I didn't feel it quite deserved a page unto itself. Thank you! ~
1202:), so you can expect to be reverted in some cases when you do that... Just so you know. If you have any questions, just shoot me a line. Thanks! --
979:", but that page of the MoS says nothing about preferring tabled lists of works over bulleted lists (a bulleted list which was in compliance with
671:. I always link to that in edit summaries. At least it gives other editors a chance to read it, and hopefully discourage them from reverting.
205:, items such as: TV series. TV movie. 5 episodes. These should not be followed by a period. I have removed them from the article. Thanks. --
224:
Hello. Thank you for your work on creating actor filmography tables. Regarding your work where you are changing the headings, for example:
31:
1322:
804:
765:
563:
Well, they're inappropriate in the contexts we've seen you using them, and you've done this to at least a hundred articles. You
325:
1991, 1991) looks a little repetitive. Thank you, though. :) I did wonder when I saw I had a new message what I was doing wrong
53:
1318:
236:, you are reverting filmographies to old (outdated) coding. Please note (again!) that there are guidelines for the tables at
187:
for filmographies. If you have worked on filmographies that incorporate episodes under the title, please fix them. Thank you.
165:
On the other hand, if the film was a short or something that isn't going to have an article, it's likely best left unlinked.
48:
421:
366:; these tools enable them to access out content, but it gets all confused, for them, if things like the years are omitted.
1802:
1313:
Thank you for creating the table. Please restore the director, producer, writer credits you deleted in the process. See
1242:
1208:
1810:
1745:
1682:
1674:
1617:
1552:
1487:
157:
If you know that the film or TV show is notable enough for an article but it just doesn't have one yet, then link it.
58:
1827:
1762:
1697:
1632:
1567:
1502:
1479:
800:
761:
1180:
dateranges in a format like "2012-2015" are not correct, and should instead be "2012–15" (notice the use also of an
1544:
1199:
976:
757:
417:
1737:
1444:
668:
38:
27:
1609:
1398:
1368:
1347:
1330:
391:
1314:
1191:
919:
channel for "countering systemic bias one new editor at a time", aka closing the gender gap! Come hang out at
329:, I'm starting to think it's something no one will ever agree on. =\ ♪Your Opheliac♫ 06:02, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
65:
1044:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
192:
286:
69:
1152:
929:
276:
210:
81:
73:
358:
The explicit years on each row are also about accessibility as well as being able to sort the table. On
97:
85:
43:
351:. This is about accessibility for those using variety of browsers; some use monochrome hand-phones or
1798:
1783:
1077:
1001:
980:
945:
158:
1837:
1772:
1707:
1642:
1577:
1512:
1417:
1394:
1364:
1343:
1326:
1289:
949:
984:
420:, and I'll be raising this issue there. I'm asking a few editors to have an initial discussion at
1425:
1358:
1058:
ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Jan+30%2C+1994&author=HILARY+de+VRIES&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+
885:
846:
776:
734:
727:
My very first
Barnstar! I'm so proud. :D Thank you! ♪Your Opheliac♫ 10:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
715:
568:
479:
425:
370:
312:
290:
188:
34:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
1265:
413:
268:
237:
184:
1733:
1718:
80:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
1604:
1588:
1382:
1306:
1148:
1097:
925:
471:
272:
206:
920:
1246:
1212:
1184:
1122:
829:
is correct, but the 7th Heaven Work/Worked was a mistake - I probably read it wrong. As for
676:
650:
628:
604:
172:
150:
123:
93:
1177:
1169:
1104:
that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
988:
113:
1073:
1069:
1033:
1024:
993:
408:
396:
972:
139:
are reserved for titles of television shows, films, books, and music albums. Basically,
1832:
1767:
1702:
1669:
1653:
1637:
1572:
1507:
1413:
1285:
1140:
968:
355:; some use displays a metre wide. It's also about consistency across the whole project.
1474:
1458:
1421:
1228:
1173:
1162:
475:
363:
567:
help fix them, now. See the Delpy example, and others that Rossrs and I have fixed.
202:
1539:
1523:
1237:
1203:
1109:
699:
672:
646:
642:
624:
600:
359:
308:
167:
145:
118:
112:
film" links where the year of the film is linked should be avoided. Please see
1068:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
1064:
pre-1997+Fulltext "The Trip to Bankable",] '']'', January 30, 1994</ref: -->
369:
There's be a ton of talk about this and the consensus is pretty clear. Cheers,
1139:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
746:
1841:
1776:
1711:
1646:
1581:
1516:
1451:
1429:
1402:
1372:
1351:
1334:
1292:
1251:
1217:
1156:
1081:
1008:
953:
933:
898:
859:
808:
789:
769:
737:
718:
680:
654:
632:
608:
571:
482:
428:
373:
315:
293:
280:
214:
196:
174:
152:
125:
101:
1284:
to convert filmographies to tables. Thank you for taking the time to do it
1232:
1195:
1391:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Katherine Barrell (2nd nomination)
311:, for example; that's the sort of form you should be following. Cheers,
285:
Youropheliac, all of the examples above lack consensus, as the RFC on
162:
and put the links in himself. So it's simpler to just have red links.
1037:
352:
1560:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Myndy Crist (2nd nomination)
1172:
filmographies. A couple of things – First, you may want to review
1168:
Hello Satinandsteel. I notice that you've been doing some work on
271:
for more information. Click on edit to see the coding. Thanks! --
77:
1190:
rather than a "regular" dash...). (You may also want to review
253:{|class="wikitable" |- ! | Year ! | Film ! | Role ! | Notes |-
131:
Oh! And episode titles should only be in "double quotes", not
1439:
Hi. You've removed some of the acting credits of the actress
617:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers#Awards
599:. I'm glad you're working on updating these filmographies.
1805:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
1740:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
1677:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
1612:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
1547:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
1482:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
775:
It did? How so? All I did was 'fix' the Filmography table.
983:). So if the article was already in compliance with both
1797:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1732:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1667:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1602:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1537:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1472:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1440:
1144:
1132:
1128:
1113:
1045:
1041:
1029:
964:
753:
596:
404:
305:
233:
229:
225:
714:
For your work cleaning-up filmography tables. Cheers,
1819:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Anastasia Horne
1389:
Just thought you'd be interested in what's going on:
1040:
by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
959:
changes to article already in compliance with the MoS
915:
Hi! I wanted to let you know that we have created an
289:
found. Ping me and I'll fill you in further. Cheers,
1690:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Isabel Glasser
760:but introduced significant changes to the content.
1495:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Francie Swift
88:, or ask your question on this page and then place
1416:, you may or may not wish to join a discussion at
916:
911:You should come hang out with us on the internetz!
1317:for guidance and go one step further: review the
347:differentiated from the data cells, although not
247:{{Filmography table begin|Year|Title|Role|Notes}}
1053:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
143:for larger works, "double quotes" for smaller.
1754:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Una Damon
1625:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Lori Rom
8:
621:User:Rossrs/Sandbox/filmography and awards
250:This replaces the last preferred version:
64:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1807:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
1742:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
1679:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
1614:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
1549:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
1484:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
697:
623:. Your thoughts would be most welcome.
412:preference. The relevant guidelines are
1418:Talk:Lyndsy Fonseca#Request for comment
92:before the question. Again, welcome!
1027:. I have automatically detected that
7:
590:Title sorting in filmography tables
470:it's sorted-out. You probably read
39:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
1816:The discussion will take place at
1751:The discussion will take place at
1688:The discussion will take place at
1623:The discussion will take place at
1558:The discussion will take place at
1493:The discussion will take place at
1323:Morgan Freeman on screen and stage
30:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
1274:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
1790:
1725:
1660:
1595:
1530:
1465:
1264:
1091:
1018:
939:Hello -- changes to Colin Morgan
698:
619:and I also started a sandbox at
1319:Matthew McConaughey filmography
1009:08:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
394:and the related discussion at:
260:version you have been adding:
1:
1403:06:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
1227:I see you're still not doing
1082:20:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
991:, why did you change it? —
422:User talk:RexxS/Accessibility
215:15:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
175:14:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
1430:17:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
738:10:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
719:08:53, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
681:12:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
655:12:29, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
633:08:17, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
197:02:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
116:for these points and more.
54:How to write a great article
1373:01:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
1352:10:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
1335:06:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
1252:00:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
1087:Reference errors on 16 June
934:22:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
880:was the original title for
609:13:59, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
445:Hi. I changed the page and
269:WP:ACTOR#Filmography_tables
153:22:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
126:22:05, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
1857:
1452:07:48, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
1412:As someone who has edited
1176:: under Knowledge (XXG)'s
1070:these opt-out instructions
954:10:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
899:23:33, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
860:23:32, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
809:06:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
790:01:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
770:06:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
572:01:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
102:08:01, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
26:Hello, Satinandsteel, and
1842:01:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
1803:significantly contributed
1777:01:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
1738:significantly contributed
1712:01:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
1675:significantly contributed
1610:significantly contributed
1582:01:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
1545:significantly contributed
1480:significantly contributed
1270:
1263:
1236:your edits. Thank you. --
1218:20:27, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
1157:00:24, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
730:enjoy... and keep it up.
704:
483:16:25, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
429:04:33, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
374:06:53, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
316:03:29, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
82:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
1647:01:05, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
1443:. Please add them back.
1293:22:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
1145:report it to my operator
821:Not quite sure which of
595:link. An example is at
397:User talk:RexxS#rowspans
392:User:RexxS/Accessibility
294:16:34, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
281:14:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
1517:01:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
1046:my operator's talk page
388:Hi, again. Please see:
220:Filmographies June 2010
1828:the configuration page
1763:the configuration page
1698:the configuration page
1633:the configuration page
1568:the configuration page
1503:the configuration page
1102:automatically detected
801:Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus
762:Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus
1381:Editor has nominated
708:The Original Barnstar
240:. There was also a
1801:, to which you have
1736:, to which you have
1673:, to which you have
1608:, to which you have
1543:, to which you have
1478:, to which you have
1036:may have broken the
989:WP:LOW#Filmographies
921:#wikimedia-gendergap
1809:or if it should be
1744:or if it should be
1681:or if it should be
1616:or if it should be
1551:or if it should be
1486:or if it should be
1325:examples provided.
963:I don't understand
474:a while back; see:
403:The other day, you
756:was summarised as
450:31 July 2010 (UTC)
242:lengthy discussion
49:How to edit a page
32:your contributions
1448:
1383:Katherine Barrell
1307:Katherine Barrell
1298:
1297:
1250:
1216:
1126:
975:said it was "per
944:this up? Thanks!
892:
853:
783:
724:
723:
472:Lord of the Flies
72:your messages on
1848:
1794:
1793:
1729:
1728:
1664:
1663:
1599:
1598:
1534:
1533:
1469:
1468:
1449:
1446:
1268:
1261:
1260:
1257:For your efforts
1240:
1206:
1200:WP:ACCESSIBILITY
1189:
1183:
1120:
1095:
1094:
1063:
1049:
1022:
1021:
1006:
1000:
996:
977:WP:ACCESSIBILITY
896:
890:
857:
851:
787:
781:
758:WP:ACCESSIBILITY
702:
695:
694:
597:Frances O'Connor
418:WP:ACCESSIBILITY
170:
148:
121:
91:
74:discussion pages
1856:
1855:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1830:. Delivered by
1799:Anastasia Horne
1795:
1791:
1788:
1784:Anastasia Horne
1765:. Delivered by
1730:
1726:
1723:
1700:. Delivered by
1665:
1661:
1658:
1635:. Delivered by
1600:
1596:
1593:
1570:. Delivered by
1535:
1531:
1528:
1505:. Delivered by
1470:
1466:
1463:
1447:−αΣn=1NDi+Fexti
1445:
1437:
1410:
1387:
1311:
1259:
1187:
1181:
1166:
1092:
1089:
1059:
1034:Madeleine Stowe
1028:
1019:
1016:
1004:
998:
994:
967:to the article
961:
941:
913:
886:
882:Virtually Casey
847:
827:Virtually Casey
777:
750:
693:
669:WP:ACCESSIBILTY
592:
409:Zachary Bennett
264:
256:as well as the
254:
248:
222:
166:
144:
117:
109:
89:
59:Manual of Style
19:
12:
11:
5:
1854:
1852:
1789:
1787:
1782:Nomination of
1780:
1724:
1722:
1717:Nomination of
1715:
1670:Isabel Glasser
1659:
1657:
1654:Isabel Glasser
1652:Nomination of
1650:
1594:
1592:
1587:Nomination of
1585:
1529:
1527:
1522:Nomination of
1520:
1464:
1462:
1457:Nomination of
1455:
1436:
1433:
1414:Lyndsy Fonseca
1409:
1408:Neutral notice
1406:
1395:Pyxis Solitary
1386:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1365:Pyxis Solitary
1344:Pyxis Solitary
1327:Pyxis Solitary
1315:WP:FILMOGRAPHY
1310:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1296:
1295:
1277:
1276:
1271:
1269:
1258:
1255:
1225:
1224:
1192:WP:FILMOGRAPHY
1165:
1160:
1141:false positive
1137:
1136:
1088:
1085:
1066:
1065:
1055:
1054:
1015:
1014:September 2014
1012:
969:Noley Thornton
960:
957:
940:
937:
912:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
814:
813:
812:
811:
793:
792:
749:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
722:
721:
711:
710:
705:
703:
692:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
660:
659:
658:
657:
636:
635:
591:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
401:
400:
399:
395:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
367:
356:
341:
333:
332:
331:
330:
319:
318:
262:
252:
246:
221:
218:
180:
179:
178:
177:
163:
108:
105:
62:
61:
56:
51:
46:
41:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1853:
1844:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1834:
1829:
1824:
1823:the article.
1821:
1820:
1814:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1785:
1781:
1779:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1769:
1764:
1759:
1758:the article.
1756:
1755:
1749:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1720:
1716:
1714:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1704:
1699:
1694:
1693:the article.
1691:
1686:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1671:
1655:
1651:
1649:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1639:
1634:
1629:
1628:the article.
1626:
1621:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1606:
1590:
1586:
1584:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1574:
1569:
1564:
1563:the article.
1561:
1556:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1541:
1525:
1521:
1519:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1498:the article.
1496:
1491:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1476:
1475:Francie Swift
1460:
1459:Francie Swift
1456:
1454:
1453:
1450:
1442:
1434:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1407:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1384:
1380:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:SatinandSteel
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1308:
1305:
1301:Thank you! :)
1300:
1299:
1294:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1278:
1275:
1272:
1267:
1262:
1256:
1254:
1253:
1248:
1244:
1239:
1234:
1230:
1229:MOS:DATERANGE
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1214:
1210:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1186:
1179:
1175:
1174:MOS:DATERANGE
1171:
1164:
1163:MOS:DATERANGE
1161:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1134:
1130:
1124:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1103:
1099:
1086:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1062:
1057:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1047:
1043:
1042:edit the page
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1013:
1011:
1010:
1007:
1003:
997:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
958:
956:
955:
951:
947:
938:
936:
935:
931:
927:
922:
918:
910:
900:
897:
895:
889:
883:
879:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
861:
858:
856:
850:
844:
843:The Robinsons
840:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
810:
806:
802:
797:
796:
795:
794:
791:
788:
786:
780:
774:
773:
772:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
748:
745:
739:
736:
735:Jack Merridew
733:
732:terima kasih.
729:
728:
726:
725:
720:
717:
716:Jack Merridew
713:
712:
709:
706:
701:
696:
690:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
639:
638:
637:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
613:
612:
611:
610:
606:
602:
598:
589:
573:
570:
569:Jack Merridew
566:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
535:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
484:
481:
480:Jack Merridew
477:
476:Jack Merridew
473:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
448:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
430:
427:
426:Jack Merridew
424:. Sincerely,
423:
419:
415:
410:
406:
402:
398:
393:
390:
389:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
375:
372:
371:Jack Merridew
368:
365:
364:screen reader
361:
357:
354:
350:
346:
342:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
328:
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
314:
313:Jack Merridew
310:
307:
302:
301:
300:
296:
295:
292:
291:Jack Merridew
288:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
261:
259:
258:very outdated
251:
245:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
219:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
199:
198:
194:
190:
189:Wildhartlivie
186:
176:
173:
169:
164:
160:
156:
155:
154:
151:
147:
142:
138:
134:
130:
129:
128:
127:
124:
120:
115:
107:Filmographies
106:
104:
103:
99:
95:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
60:
57:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
36:
35:
33:
29:
24:
23:
16:
1831:
1825:
1817:
1815:
1796:
1786:for deletion
1766:
1760:
1752:
1750:
1731:
1721:for deletion
1701:
1695:
1687:
1668:
1666:
1656:for deletion
1636:
1630:
1622:
1603:
1601:
1591:for deletion
1571:
1565:
1557:
1538:
1536:
1526:for deletion
1506:
1500:
1492:
1473:
1471:
1461:for deletion
1438:
1411:
1388:
1385:for deletion
1338:
1312:
1281:
1273:
1226:
1167:
1149:ReferenceBot
1138:
1133:Ask for help
1101:
1098:ReferenceBot
1090:
1067:
1060:
1017:
992:
973:edit summary
965:your changes
962:
942:
926:SarahStierch
914:
893:
887:
881:
877:
854:
848:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
784:
778:
752:Your recent
751:
731:
707:
691:good work ;)
593:
564:
533:
446:
349:dramatically
348:
344:
343:The headers
326:
297:
284:
273:Logical Fuzz
265:
257:
255:
249:
223:
207:Logical Fuzz
203:Brooke Nevin
200:
181:
140:
136:
132:
110:
86:my talk page
84:, ask me on
63:
25:
21:
20:
1540:Myndy Crist
1524:Myndy Crist
1435:Filmography
1309:Filmography
1282:lot of work
1110:Dena Kaplan
1096:Hello, I'm
1023:Hello, I'm
835:Teen Titans
831:Jackie Chan
643:Summer Glau
360:Julie Delpy
309:Julie Delpy
94:Aboutmovies
76:using four
1147:. Thanks,
1143:, you can
1118:cite error
1074:BracketBot
1072:. Thanks,
1025:BracketBot
995:fourthords
981:WP:LISTGAP
799:changes?
747:Mike Erwin
508:2010 (UTC)
478:. Cheers,
159:WP:REDLINK
90:{{helpme}}
66:Wikipedian
1833:SDZeroBot
1768:SDZeroBot
1734:Una Damon
1719:Una Damon
1703:SDZeroBot
1638:SDZeroBot
1573:SDZeroBot
1508:SDZeroBot
1286:MarnetteD
1116:caused a
1114:your edit
1100:. I have
1030:your edit
985:WP:ACCESS
946:Panpantom
68:! Please
1605:Lori Rom
1589:Lori Rom
1422:Tenebrae
1280:It is a
1243:contribs
1233:MOS:DASH
1209:contribs
1196:MOS:DASH
971:. Your
878:Web Girl
839:Everwood
823:Web Girl
641:And yet
414:WP:TABLE
306:wikified
287:WT:ACTOR
238:WP:ACTOR
185:WP:ACTOR
44:Tutorial
22:Welcome!
1811:deleted
1746:deleted
1683:deleted
1618:deleted
1553:deleted
1488:deleted
1185:en dash
1108:On the
405:changed
353:Kindles
141:italics
137:Italics
133:italics
28:welcome
17:Welcome
1339:-: -->
1238:IJBall
1204:IJBall
1194:, and
1178:WP:MOS
1170:WP:BLP
1112:page,
1038:syntax
841:, and
673:Rossrs
647:Rossrs
625:Rossrs
601:Rossrs
232:, and
168:Dismas
146:Dismas
119:Dismas
114:WP:LOW
78:tildes
1340:: -->
894:Steel
888:Satin
855:Steel
849:Satin
785:Steel
779:Satin
565:could
1838:talk
1773:talk
1708:talk
1643:talk
1578:talk
1513:talk
1441:here
1426:talk
1420:. --
1399:talk
1369:talk
1348:talk
1331:talk
1321:and
1290:Talk
1247:talk
1231:and
1213:talk
1153:talk
1123:help
1078:talk
987:and
950:talk
930:talk
876:Ah,
805:talk
766:talk
754:edit
677:talk
651:talk
629:talk
605:talk
447:then
416:and
407:the
277:talk
234:here
230:here
226:here
211:talk
193:talk
98:talk
70:sign
1129:Fix
1127:. (
1032:to
1002:=Λ=
917:IRC
891:and
852:and
825:or
782:and
534:Wow
345:are
327:now
135:.
1840:)
1813:.
1775:)
1748:.
1710:)
1685:.
1645:)
1620:.
1580:)
1555:.
1515:)
1490:.
1428:)
1401:)
1393:.
1371:)
1350:)
1333:)
1245:•
1211:•
1188:}}
1182:{{
1155:)
1131:|
1080:)
952:)
932:)
884:.
837:,
833:,
807:)
768:)
679:)
653:)
631:)
607:)
279:)
228:,
213:)
195:)
100:)
1836:(
1771:(
1706:(
1641:(
1576:(
1511:(
1424:(
1397:(
1367:(
1346:(
1329:(
1288:|
1249:)
1241:(
1215:)
1207:(
1151:(
1135:)
1125:)
1121:(
1076:(
1061:(
1048:.
1005:|
999:|
948:(
928:(
803:(
764:(
675:(
649:(
627:(
603:(
275:(
209:(
191:(
171:|
149:|
122:|
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.