Knowledge

User talk:Selvydra

Source 📝

22: 216:
Furthermore, I didn't refuse to accept WP:BRD, I've always accepted it, I was asking questions on VP to see if I made a mistake in interpretation. I've been trying my best and for you keep trying singling me out and making up claims that are not true. I've addressed complaints on the page, but I'm sorry if I went about it the wrong way, like I stated on other pages that wasn't my intention.
28: 162: 369:
In case it isn't clear, my edit (which was restored to) was to update the pre-deletion content with undisputed stuff. I then reverted it again, because I too didn't want to be seen as edit-warring. I did this to take those the citations, MOS etc. out of the equation in the hopes that this would allow
230:
Why then won't you revert your mass restoration of disputed content? Even content that was added days ago? No edit or fixes can be made to the enormous amounts of content that you decided on your own to mass restore in violation of BRD because no one wants to violate Knowledge policy and be seen as
172:
regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to
215:
You really seem to have a problem with me. As mentioned in other discussions, I didn't edit war, I restored Selvydra's edit, which as I stated on VP may have been a misunderstanding of policy on my part due to the conflicting information that was shared with me and due to my interpretation.
532:
Yes unfortunately it won't be a quick and simple button-press, but a thing to do over time, maybe bit by bit, and perhaps with less radical solutions then those two propose. I'll try to help when I have some time, but I don't really have that much at the moment. Still, I can pitch in. 🌿
127:
Hi Selvydra, I just wanted to let you know that in the future you should only click the minor edit button if the edits you're making are actually minor (e.g. fixing a typo or formatting), and shouldn't be used for larger changes (especially considering the controversial nature of
312:, go ahead. I agreed with like 90% of your edits. I just got policy wrong, once again, I'm so sorry about that. Are we fine? I also think some of the subsequent edits by other editors and I were solving some issues, but we can work on those later. There's no rush like you said. 141:
Hello – fair enough. I figured if it's something that doesn't meaningfully change the content (additional context to 1 sentence + grammar fixes), it would qualify as minor. But, it may have changed the tone somewhat. I'll err on the side of not using it in the future.
496:
is much too long, but also think the entry has potential. Streamlining so as not to drown the reader would be the best thing to do. You saw the reaction at the Village Pump, etc. Would you consider going back and undoing any part of your mass restoration,
431:– Alright. Just for your information, there was such a process ongoing already re: MrX's removals, so expect to see some of those returned if/when consensus has been achieved. New discussions will be started for disputed removals not addressed by him. 387:
How do you want to go about the consensus process? It looked like MrX's edits at least partially overlapped with yours. Should we start by resolving those and then move on to the content you deleted before him?
294:
If I have your permission to undo your big edit and fix the subsequent edits, I can do it. That said, there's no time pressure. They key was just getting everyone on the same page regarding how consensus works.
501:? Can we work on paring this page down to what is really strongly sourced and historical? I think there is likely to be a there there, worth an entry, the more I look back into it. 🌿 34: 248:, sure, I'll do it later, you should have asked earlier. If you did, sorry that I missed it. I'll have to do it later though, since I'm busy with real life stuff atm. 169: 380:
You probably already know this, but absent the ability to edit fixes into the live article, you could have pulled the inactive version into your
196:
that the days-old content that this user edit-warred back into the article should be removed ASAP? Because that editor refuses to accept that
410:
Each piece of information that you or others want included should be discussed on the talk page and/or external boards to achieve consensus.
374:
disputed, whether or not the edit war continued. I didn't mean to encourage it with that action, if that's what I was being alleged of doing.
360:. I forgot to give my cat his supper yesterday because of round 1; suffice to say he wasn't happy. (Don't worry – he got it eventually.) 493: 129: 104:
using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
97: 38: 85: 132:). This isn't really a big thing but I just wanted to remind you. Thank you for helping improve the article! Cheers. — 90: 415: 331: 300: 236: 205: 178: 45:
and I have been editing Knowledge for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
519: 317: 285: 267: 253: 221: 70: 65: 428: 411: 363: 327: 309: 296: 245: 232: 201: 174: 105: 200:
is a thing and is under the wrong impression that multiple editors share his view of Knowledge policy.
381: 113: 101: 46: 384:
and drafted the changes there. Another option is to do what I did – revert, edit and then undo that.
50: 515: 498: 313: 281: 263: 249: 217: 193: 133: 514:, don't worry. I agreed with them. I just wasn't sure what to make of the subsequent edits. 56: 534: 511: 502: 109: 42: 462:
I think so. Consensus-building should be next, following Snoogans' removals and edits.
21: 463: 453: 432: 389: 197: 143: 80: 357: 75: 366:– It seems like the situation is clearing up. I just wanted to make a few notes. 61:
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
450: 449:
I was pinged, but it looks like the issue at hand has resolved itself? -
277: 27: 537: 523: 505: 471: 457: 440: 419: 397: 335: 321: 304: 289: 271: 257: 240: 225: 209: 182: 161: 151: 136: 117: 168:
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
492:
I'm sorry but I agree with snoog & the x that the entry on
378:
No edit or fixes can be made to the enormous amounts of content
262:
Although, what do I do about the edits that came after though?
160: 157:
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
91:
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
8: 280:as well since their answer would help too. 356:Whoa, okay; hi and welcome to round 2 of 170:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 20: 377: 7: 173:help form a consensus. Thank you!. 14: 494:Media coverage of Bernie Sanders 370:us to hone in on the parts that 192:Are you going to communicate to 26: 1: 538:20:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 524:20:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 506:19:57, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 472:23:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 458:23:11, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 441:20:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 420:20:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 398:20:13, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 336:20:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 322:20:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 305:19:58, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 290:19:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 272:19:16, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 258:19:16, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 241:17:24, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 226:17:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 210:16:56, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 183:18:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC) 152:05:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC) 137:01:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC) 118:00:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC) 71:The five pillars of Knowledge 25:Some cookies to welcome you! 86:How to write a great article 556: 37:, Selvydra! Thank you for 49:. You can also check out 467: 436: 393: 188:Talking to MikkelJSmith2 147: 96:Also, when you post on 165: 31: 164: 24: 35:Welcome to Knowledge 130:the article's topic 51:Knowledge:Questions 326:Yes, we are fine. 166: 76:How to edit a page 39:your contributions 32: 547: 488:On media matters 429:Snooganssnoogans 412:Snooganssnoogans 364:Snooganssnoogans 328:Snooganssnoogans 310:Snooganssnoogans 297:Snooganssnoogans 246:Snooganssnoogans 233:Snooganssnoogans 202:Snooganssnoogans 175:Snooganssnoogans 60: 30: 555: 554: 550: 549: 548: 546: 545: 544: 490: 190: 159: 125: 54: 19: 12: 11: 5: 553: 551: 543: 542: 541: 540: 527: 526: 489: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 444: 443: 423: 422: 403: 402: 401: 400: 385: 375: 361: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 231:edit-warring. 189: 186: 158: 155: 124: 121: 102:sign your name 94: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 552: 539: 536: 531: 530: 529: 528: 525: 521: 517: 513: 510: 509: 508: 507: 504: 500: 495: 487: 473: 469: 465: 461: 460: 459: 455: 452: 448: 447: 446: 445: 442: 438: 434: 430: 427: 426: 425: 424: 421: 417: 413: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 399: 395: 391: 386: 383: 379: 376: 373: 368: 367: 365: 362: 359: 355: 354: 337: 333: 329: 325: 324: 323: 319: 315: 311: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 293: 292: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 274: 273: 269: 265: 261: 260: 259: 255: 251: 247: 244: 243: 242: 238: 234: 229: 228: 227: 223: 219: 214: 213: 212: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 194:MikkelJSmith2 187: 185: 184: 180: 176: 171: 163: 156: 154: 153: 149: 145: 139: 138: 135: 131: 122: 120: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 92: 89: 87: 84: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 62: 58: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 29: 23: 16: 516:MikkelJSmith 499:MikkelJSmith 491: 371: 314:MikkelJSmith 282:MikkelJSmith 264:MikkelJSmith 250:MikkelJSmith 218:MikkelJSmith 191: 167: 140: 126: 95: 66:Introduction 47:my talk page 33: 123:Minor edits 100:you should 535:SashiRolls 512:SashiRolls 503:SashiRolls 110:HopsonRoad 106:Wikipedian 98:talk pages 81:Help pages 43:HopsonRoad 382:userspace 464:Selvydra 433:Selvydra 390:Selvydra 276:tagging 144:Selvydra 53:or type 17:Welcome! 134:Chevvin 57:help me 41:. I am 198:WP:BRD 358:WP:DR 520:talk 468:talk 437:talk 416:talk 394:talk 372:were 332:talk 318:talk 301:talk 286:talk 268:talk 254:talk 237:talk 222:talk 206:talk 179:talk 148:talk 114:talk 456:🖋 278:MrX 108:! 522:) 470:) 451:Mr 439:) 418:) 396:) 334:) 320:) 303:) 288:) 270:) 256:) 239:) 224:) 208:) 181:) 150:) 116:) 59:}} 55:{{ 518:( 466:( 454:X 435:( 414:( 392:( 330:( 316:( 299:( 284:( 266:( 252:( 235:( 220:( 204:( 177:( 146:( 112:(

Index



Welcome to Knowledge
your contributions
HopsonRoad
my talk page
Knowledge:Questions
help me
Introduction
The five pillars of Knowledge
How to edit a page
Help pages
How to write a great article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
talk pages
sign your name
Wikipedian
HopsonRoad
talk
00:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
the article's topic
Chevvin
01:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Selvydra
talk
05:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard
Snooganssnoogans
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.