73:
128:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
162:
In this day in age it is the done thing. Not having wi-fi is unprecetented. They have it in airports, McDonald's, BK, Pizza Hut, hotels, shops, railways stations etc. so to be frank, OK there may be the odd place not to have it but it is now as common as all people having two eyes.
87:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's
203:
provide free wifi. Also you asked a good question on the article's talk page, why were you removing the source and adding content without a source? --
96:
146:
I have reverted your edit. It appears to be that you are putting your original research into the article. Is there any source that says
42:
22:
88:
104:
108:
116:
38:
121:
100:
99:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
84:
150:
provide free wifi? Discuss the edits on the article's talk page, do not continue to edit war. --
92:
181:. You cannot introduce your comparison into the article unless you can provide a reliable source (
190:
164:
53:
207:
154:
137:
125:
199:
It might be unprecedented, but you will need to provide a very good ssource that says
34:
133:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --
186:
182:
178:
204:
177:
Even if you are correct, that is *still* your own reasoning and is forbidden by
151:
134:
95:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
72:
210:
194:
172:
157:
140:
61:
46:
80:
124:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
201:"all other coffee chains and rival independent coffee shops"
148:"all other coffee chains and rival independent coffee shops"
71:
115:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
107:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
91:to work toward making a version that represents
131:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule
8:
52:Harry the Dirty Dog is a stalker, tell him.
83:shows that you are currently engaged in an
33:Please cut out the editwarring now. Read
7:
14:
23:User talk:Shookenlover/Archive 1
120:—especially if you violate the
79:Your recent editing history at
1:
231:
211:21:19, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
195:21:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
185:) saying the same thing.
173:21:08, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
158:20:47, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
141:20:21, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
62:20:20, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
47:20:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
168:
57:
76:
75:
117:blocked from editing
105:dispute resolution
77:
122:three-revert rule
222:
230:
229:
225:
224:
223:
221:
220:
219:
109:page protection
70:
31:
19:
12:
11:
5:
228:
226:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
197:
69:
66:
65:
64:
30:
27:
26:
25:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
227:
212:
209:
206:
202:
198:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
175:
174:
170:
166:
161:
160:
159:
156:
153:
149:
145:
144:
143:
142:
139:
136:
132:
127:
123:
119:
118:
112:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
74:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
50:
49:
48:
44:
40:
36:
28:
24:
21:
20:
16:
200:
165:Shookenlover
147:
130:
114:
113:
78:
54:Shookenlover
32:
101:noticeboard
68:March 2015
93:consensus
89:talk page
129:warring—
103:or seek
85:edit war
81:Coffee 1
29:Coffee 1
17:See also
187:Squinge
126:reverts
39:!BSGT!
35:WP:3RR
183:WP:RS
179:WP:OR
191:talk
169:talk
58:talk
43:talk
37:. --
208:fan
155:fan
138:fan
111:.
97:BRD
205:GB
193:)
171:)
163:--
152:GB
135:GB
60:)
45:)
189:(
167:(
56:(
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
