User talk:Shanoman

2302:

too bold to add those items to the list? They seemed pretty accurate to me, albeit "Sexuality" is perhaps overly general, and "Technological Singularity" overly specific. But somehow I suspect that perhaps you are taking the broadest, most general view possible of the term "Techno-progressive" so as to exclude an over-emphasis on the transhumanist movement (which is itself divided between techno-progressives and "extropian libertarians"). I am sorry if I have the wrong impression, but I was under the assumption that nearly everyone who described themselves as a "techno-progressive" was also a "transhumanist", or at least very favorable towards the concept, am I grossly mistaken?

2090:

a better researcher I'd attempt to add those sections myself, but I'll take your word for it; it sounds reasonable (although it seems to me that I saw somewhere else---maybe on Facebook or MySpace---where someone was attempting to promote the electronic cigarette and was being thwarted, something in conjunction with somebody else trying to say they will still be illegal in places with smoking bans). Personally I think I'm all for it, because I am a relapsed smoker of regular cigarettes but would love to find a way to "do it" (intake nicotine) in a safer (healthier) and more socially-acceptable form. Keep up the good work!

1110:

his views, but I currently don't know of any. However, I do remember him referencing another work by Christian authors---I can't think of their names---but it seems to me like it was a husband/wife team who wrote something that was critical of ALL psychology (insisting that religion is absolutely incompatible with any psychology whatsoever). If I happen to stumble across their names, I'll post it here. If you want to use the article as a place to collect critiques of Nietzsche, Rand, Dawkins, et. al, I don't mind. In fact, I'd love to see more material regarding these figures.

942: 2345:

it as such but rather of what people have made of it, and perhaps a criticism of the term and what it denotes, but really, what Carrico does and what self-described "transhumanists" do covers almost the exact same area of research/inquiry---and I suspect that Carrico indeed shares many opinions with many "transhumanists" (even if he doesn't wish to identify as one himself, he is hardly an "anti-transhumanist"). That's just my take. Thanks for your time in replying to me, Loremaster.

442:". By what other means do you think us humans might use to achieve this, faith, prayer, or magick, perhaps (I'm not necessarily totally opposed to any or all of the above, though very wary of faith and prayer)? I'm really interested in hearing more about what you said, especially the mentality thing and how things are perceived differently in Europe. Yes, I am from the U.S., but I see myself as highly atypical for an "American" (U.S. citizen). Please tell me more. 1246: 1174: 1511:

I had trouble making multiple columns in a clean fashion. When I tried, I got a result like you have with your current version of your user page (with all due respect) -- boxes would not stay aligned and spaces popped up everywhere. Maybe I was writing the code incorrectly. I really don't know. Making multiple, neat columns is still a mystery to me. As you refine your user page, if you figure out any insights into this, please pass them along.

2372:. If you also take the time to browse the archives of his blog, you will quickly realize that Carrico has become an avowed "anti-transhumanist" who ridicules transhumanism as a “robot cult” that he wants to see shut down. More importantly, he considers the Singularity (and similar “areas of research/inquiry”) to be an irrational religious-like techno-utopian fantasy that smart people should not waste their time indulging in. -- 2407: 2780: 2563: 1684: 2625: 93:

noticed in the Knowledge article on the Republican Party, it is indeed asserted that a Sixth Party System began in 1980 (and it doesn't even note the controversy!). If that is the case, then it should be about time for a SEVENTH Party System (or at the very least, separate articles and links addressing these two subsequent, hypothetical Party Systems).Shanoman 23:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

2147: 1937: 1536: 1361: 2182: 2170: 1600: 2510: 2834: 101:

to speak of the New Deal Coalition in 2007 when almost all of the New Deal legislation itself was repealed by the end of the 1980s. Is it too much to allow on here even the speculation that it might be changing again, or is even drawing conclusions about what happened in the 1960s through the 1980s too rash to be acceptable for today's standards?

1707:. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable, and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles and content to quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated! 817:

of the Nazarene, and probably just about all other Baptists, Pentecostals, Fundamentalists, Evangelicals, nondenominationals, and just about all other conservative Christians, even those conservative individuals within the so-called liberal denominations I first mentioned (Presbyterians, Methodists, etc.). Back during the

2089:

No problem; I wasn't trying to be overly critical or negative; just thought I'd make some suggestions about what I'd like to see in the article (I know I can get carried away with some of my opinions, but all comments are SUPPOSED to be tied in to improving the article, so I gave it a shot). If I was

416:

unfortunately was just a Hollywood movie totally detached from the reality of physics). And certainly NOTHING can be done against the Sun's death when that huge fusion reactor is depleted of hydrogen, or the hypothetical thermal death of the Universe. Please. We lack the technology, the knowledge, in

92:

I would really appreciate it if someone would create a separate article on this hypothetical topic, for afterall, if all the previous systems only lasted 30-40 years, how rational is it to hold that the Fifth Party System, starting in the early 1930s, survives even today, over 70 years later? Also, I

1510:

userboxes. They belong to everyone. So use as many as you want. And feel free to "steal" from those on anyone else's page as well. Regarding my presentation of the boxes, I will forewarn you that I found it difficult to create a neat presentation. I was able to create clean column of user boxes, but

957:

Slurs? I take them as compliments! I don't find anything wrong with any of those activities listed, with the possible exception of the tax-raising, but that's probably because I used to be a libertarian (yikes!), and I still think like one sometimes, but basically, I'm a real regular kind of liberal

841:

are way more conservative than they used to be. It makes me angry; I wish I could go back to my childhood when things were more comfortable, and that I could just dismiss the rise of the fanatics as just a few crazies on the outer fringe, but unfortunately, they are now almost mainstream. Sorry if I

816:

Christian belief (Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox Catholic, and Protestant), since without it, why would Jesus-worshipers deem it necessary for Jesus to die for everyone's sins? It is most prominently preached today not only by Roman Catholics, but also by Southern Baptists, Assembly of God, Church

2367:

The tone of that two-part essay reflects the fact that Carrico was collaborating with a number of transhumanists on some projects. However, ever since he cut his professional and personal ties with these people, his critique of transhumanism and singularitarianism has become far more scathing. So I

2344:

Well I read the Carrico's article, and I didn't really see where he was very critical at all of transhumanism itself; just the label (and simplistically dividing up people into such categories). I also read Part One and found much more about transhumanism, but again, nothing so harshly critical of

205:

I watch the vhemt article and I noticed your little rant about it being anti-liberal. From your userpage, i noticed that this "liberal as selfish" thing is a topic you have a lot of passion about. i'm wondering, just, why? From the way I was taught, liberals were people who fought for the rights of

100:

Why is the existence of the Fifth Party System disputed (I thought only the ending dates were in dispute); and what is meant by saying that "the parties are now entrenched in primary legislation..."? Surely, sometime between 1960 and 2007, the alignment changed at least once; it makes little sense

2301:

Hi. I noticed you quickly undid the edits I made to the page, so I'll draw the conclusion that there's a good chance you are watching it (I must say: "Good choice! Are you for it or against it?). I don't want to get into an edit war here, but I would like to know the basis of your revert. Was I

1109:

I currently seem to have displaced my copy of the book. I'd hate to buy another one, since I am in profound disagreement with Paul Vitz's views, but I might cave-in if I see it at a discount or used book store. I wish I could tell you if there was anyone else who explicitly used the term or shared

2071:

Either your for, or against them, or came for the tag. Regardless, I appreciate you taking the time to help with input on how to improve the article. Regarding your issue with no laws posted on whether they are allowed in places that disallow smoking, there's simply not enough law on the books to

1098:

elaboration on this. The publisher looked like a spin-off of Zondervan, the leading religious publisher, so I assume that the readers wouldn't have needed too much of an argument to believe that selfishness is bad. If you still have the book or your notes, please expand on his views. Also who are

766:

By putting the citation template in tags, it'll automatically appear below when you add the reflist template. For wikilinks, you don't need the full url, just the wikilink. I would say that the wikilink itself isn't really for a prominent enough subject to have a direct link in the peristalsis

1093:

I stumbled across the selfism article. I didn't even think it was a word until I found it in Webster's 3rd. The article would be an interesting place to collect critiques of Nietzsche, Rand, "Selfist Psychologism", Dawkins, et al. I thought that the article needed a fuller presentation of Vitz's

375:

to impregnate themselves with female children only; so why now is a prominent group asking all of humanity to do this for the sake of the environment? The environment sustains our lives; this much I get; humanity is probably wise to preserve as much of it as possible, in as natural of a state as

881:

P.S. As to why I would do such a thing, it's just that I really want non-conservatives (or at least non-fundamentalists) to be educated and vigilant, not complacent or naive, because we are targets for religious extremists (fundamentalists/conservatives) everywhere! Survival depends on a simple

405:

is toxic for all life--not just us humans--what else could conceivably save the earth (and all its organisms) from a giant asteroid or comet; the sun's death; the universe's death? If someone says "Well it's not okay for anyone to interfere, because that would be against Nature's plan", it is

380:

302:

of conservatives (religious traditionalists). It disturbs me that VHEMT falls into the trap of saying that something nonhuman is so important that it is worth human annihilation; to a conservative Christian or Muslim, this would be God; to VHEMT, it is other species, the earth, nature itself,

96:

The existence of a Fifth Party System is disputed; the existence of a Sixth Party System is tenuous. Some of the sources on the subject remark on the surprising length of the FPS. One obvious suggestion is that the parties are now entrenched in primary legislation, and it is very difficult to

825:), from around the late 1800s (1870s-90s) until the 1970s, you would have been technically correct that at least the clergy of most churches that had the most members probably didn't believe in original sin---and perhaps from the 1920s to the 1970s---most church-goers didn't either. But the " 1023:

from Knowledge. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

812:": Unitarian, Presbyterian, Methodist, Lutheran, Disciples of Christ, United Church of Christ, American Baptist, Friends (Quaker), Congregationalist, and yes, Episcopalian (Anglican)) downplay the part of Original Sin or else deny it altogether, it is a very prominent part of traditional 771:

to see if the LatR page itself meets notability guidelines - it may not, or may not yet do so, and the policy will let you know what must be done to ensure the page will not be deleted. Also, when putting posts on the talk page, space them with a colon (:) to make reading easier.

980:

I still agree with what I posted above, except for that I now think that the vast majority of Americans probably are being taxed too much, because those who hold almost all of the wealth----the 0.01%-----don't pay squat or actually get hand-outs from the government.

381:

tantamount (or at least very similar) to saying "It's God's will". I refuse to give up or give in; I'm very proud, vain, selfish, hedonistic, anthropocentric, geocentric (worldly)--and I think it's all good; call me a satanist if you like----I'm really an agnostic

1055:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Knowledge guidelines.

2806:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2589:

371:. However, I don't think there was ever any significant movement, liberal or otherwise, that asked all non-blacks to sterilize themselves so that blacks can have the world all to themselves, or for men to do likewise so that women can use 290:, it is permissible, as in they are not forcing anything on anybody, but I wish to strongly persuade people against it, as I feel that it goes against the overall "spirit" of mainstream historical liberalism, which is tolerance, freedom, 2435: 2269: 2027:

article to at least B-class. All meaningful contributors will get barnstars. The article is in dire need of being developed. It is an important article in relation to the Islam in South Asia. Please help in developing the article.

474:

I was formerly a sort of "Randian" (objectivist), but have changed considerably over the past 8-11 years; I now am very interested in devising ways to show how it is both rational and selfish for most people to embrace and support

2264: 1997: 1472:

is your one-stop shop for all those answers and more. In a nutshell, internal links are made by double-bracketing the subject (eg - ]), external links by single bracketing a web address. Source citation is covered extensively at

2459: 2278: 1983: 2441: 2283: 2255: 1992: 2453: 2447: 2250: 1978: 2810:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2593:

1720:

WikiProject Article rescue squadron's (ARS) main aim is to help improve Knowledge articles and content. If someone seeks help, please try to assist if you are able. Likewise feel free to ask for help, advice and

281:

and capitalist, or at least very sympathetic to these two things. In most ways, I agree with my above definition, as I do not want to unduly limit what defines what a liberal can believe in. I suppose so long as

2735:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2479: 794:

Also, this section needs to state more explicitly that the concept of original sin is almost exclusivly Catholic (and maybe Anglican) dogma. Few other christian religions believe in the concept of original sin.

1340:, but didn't add a source. That section has been marked as needing sources for 14 months, so I've deleted it outright. If you have any sources for the material please feel free to restore what we can verify. 2177: 2173: 2644:

This seems to be an essay only. No references and my Google search for the title shows this article and one book with the expression in its subtitle, which did not seem to be making the same point as this

1734:

policies. If the article is not fixable we can help explain why and offer alternatives. Sometimes editors who are new to Knowledge may perceive the deletion of "their" article as discouraging. Encourage

1758:(AfD) discussion is where the concerns regarding each article are brought up and addressed. To be an effective member of the project you need to know how AfD works as well as how to improve articles. 872:, just like notions of moralism (chasity/virtue), vice, and sin. But I don't believe in being threatening, mean-spirited, or aggressively abrasive, so if that's how you interpeted it, I'm very sorry. 2473: 962:

liberal; I would much rather have the rich taxed at a higher rate all across the board than the current mainstream policy of higher fines for petty "crimes" (e.g. speeding, disorderly conduct, etc.)

864:

I'm sorry, please accept my apology. I was only trying to help. Perhaps I misunderstood where you were coming from; I interpreted your comments as being from one who is theologically liberal or even

2113:

because I couldn't see how they related to improving the article. If you have a point on how the article could be improved, could you please state it in such a way where it's more clear, following

1545:. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles from deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Knowledge. You can join 943:

Talking Right: How Conservatives Turned Liberalism into a Tax-Raising, Latte-Drinking, Sushi-Eating, Volvo-Driving, New York Times-Reading, Body-Piercing, Hollywood-Loving, Left-Wing Freak Show

2232: 2225: 2218: 2211: 412:

I sincerely doubt that anything could be done by humanity to prevent even a relatively "minor" disaster such as a asteroid impact, certainly not with the level of technology we have now (yes,

395:

Please do not tell me that you indeed entertain the notion that humanity through reason could save the Earth from a natural or cosmic disaster, as you seem to imply in the following passage:

494:

Why would we have an entry on a "proposed" study? How could that be notable? I have nothing against the idea but it just isn't encyclopedic or even remotely notable so why keep in here?

1152:

I've nominated the "Sex-negativity" page for deletion. Please see my arguments on the article's talk page. Just being courteous and letting you know, since you are the article creator.

2849: 2803: 1656:

A warm welcome. If there is anything I can do for you, sincerely, please let me know. I have been on wikipedia for 4 years, and have over 30,000 edits, so i know my way around :)

1479:

afterwards. Be sure there is a "References" section in the article with the {{reflist}} template below it. Finally, to be an all-star at citation, use the citation templates at

703:

Give me the raw links on this page and I'll let you know what the proper format is, it'll probably spare you a bunch of time :) I can explain what I did and why afterwards.

543:

during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -

2586: 1270:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also

1198:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also

154:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "

745:

Excellent signature. Unfortunately you can't use wikipedia as a reference, oddly enough it doesn't count as a reliable source. You can cite the book directly using a

1379:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 417:

my opinion even the common sense to prevent the death of the planet's biosphere - which will ultimately come not by way of cosmic cataclysms, but by our own actions.

1376: 532: 298:

of humanity; an uplifting of the human condition (rights, well-being, comfort, etc.), instead of the renunciation of all of the above, which was historically the

1772: 420:

But then, perhaps it's a mentality thing and here in Europe, the problem at hand is perceived differently from the U.S. (I take it that you are from the U.S.?)

2043:

Thank you for your kind consideration, but I really must decline. Sorry, but I really feel that I know very little about Sufism, apart from what I read by

886: 837:) since the late 1970s/early 1980s; even with the Roman Catholic church losing members in the United States, conservatives have been on the rise. Even the 1763: 1759: 631:

to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with

1121:

I believe I have finally rediscovered that elusive Christian husband/wife team who denounce all psychology (including Christian versions), they are:

615:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 170:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 2792: 2575: 1546: 787: 206:

blacks, women, etc. and care about the environment. The people in vhemt are definitely left-leaning, so why would they not be called liberals?--

2689: 1806: 1790: 1020: 620: 175: 72:

page for deletion because, as a resident of New Zealand, I can assure you that no such public/official holiday exists, or has ever existed. --

868:(as am I). Sorry if it offended you. As for the "Wiki etiquette", I don't care much for it, as I basically think most manners and rules are 2760: 54:

Looks like you actually know something about philosophy and philosophers. Maybe that's a better place to concentrate your efforts ;-) --

1094:

views. I assume that the emotional impact of his critique lies in simply calling his opponents "selfist" and "selfish". But he must have

2827: 1771:

Our primary work is improving Knowledge articles and content. A more dynamic list with article links and descriptions are located at

1918: 1697: 1542: 1341: 855:

My basic question is "Why would you post a comment on someone's main user page?" You may want to brush up on your Wiki etiquette.

596: 190: 1784:. Articles and sources that use non-English languages often need translation for those of us who cannot translate for ourselves. 1278:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge or discuss the relevant issues at 1206:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge or discuss the relevant issues at 1132:(sorry; I apparently do not currently have the ability to properly link this; try Google) tells all about them and their views. 829:" has open the flood gates to anti-modern, anti-humanistic beliefs, and American Christians have swung dramatically towards the 2756: 2693: 2532: 2519: 2498: 1781: 1704: 1293: 1271: 1221: 1199: 624: 600: 179: 155: 2312:

Putting aside the fact that “sexuality” is too vague a subject to add to list of techno-progressive subjects of interest, the

1402: 694: 1703:

We are a growing community of Knowledge editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles and content that have been

1060: 2320:

who has almost always been critical of transhumanism and singularitarianism. I therefore suggest you read his 2004 essay

846:; the last thing I want to do is to discourage you from using Knowledge. Please keep at it; we need more people like us! 746: 2747:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

167: 2752: 2681: 2636: 2614: 1440:

anytime. If you no longer wish to be adopted, please remove the adoptee's userbox from your userpage. Happy editing -

1267: 1195: 592: 183: 151: 2051:, but that over a decade ago for me, so sorry. Maybe I can talk one of my more knowledgeable friends into doing it. 678:

I am trying to link it to the source, which is another Knowledge article; please be patient; I'm still working on it.

2685: 1610:

Shanoman, a dynamic list of articles needing to be rescued, which changes with new updates, can be found here:

612: 147: 2816: 2796: 2579: 2369: 2024: 1372: 604: 159: 1122: 2787: 2771: 986: 804:

I wish you were correct, Padillah. Unfortunately, I believe you are mistaken. While it's true that most modern

1477:, but the simplest way is to write out your citation in the middle of the text and flank it with <ref: --> 993:

to the curb! (right after we get him "small" (weak? poor?) enough to theoretically "drown in the bathtub"!).

588: 531:). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 331:

perspective; I view conservatives as being primarily antihuman, since most believe that humans are guilty of

1731: 1048: 1047:

to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on

982: 894: 805: 732: 262: 1375:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 786:

This is in regard to you comment on the Talk page for the article on "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil" (

2668: 2316:

article is written from the perspective elaborated by the first self-described techno-progressive thinker

2020: 1433: 1414: 1028:, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 69: 1405:

in article pages. If, there is a reason to add it, please add it to the Talk page instead but first read

479:

views; if I could do likewise for the rich and powerful, then maybe all social problems would be solved (

2857: 2570: 2554: 2537: 1384: 1347: 1320: 562: 239: 1035:

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding

523:

satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "

438:

Yes, as a matter of fact, I do entertain that notion, albeit I now have a rather broad definition of "

2812: 2632: 2618: 2377: 2331: 2313: 1839: 1727: 1275: 1203: 1029: 682: 540: 520: 512: 505: 31: 2595: 2748: 2697: 2599: 1843: 1469: 1279: 1207: 1157: 910: 628: 97:

undermine or redefine the present parties. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 00:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

2044: 611:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

166:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

2878: 2841: 1736: 1076: 1016: 809: 635: 116: 2478:

ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the

1245: 1173: 294:, individualism (cultural, not necessarily economic), and a celebration of the body, mind, and 35: 2724: 2715: 2664: 2650:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

2019:

Hello Shanoman. I notice that you are interested in Sufism. I have put forth a request on the

1410: 1406: 1337: 1330: 1008: 425: 413: 2853: 2744: 2728: 2705: 2033: 1872: 1842:

again in edit mode you'll see how to achieve what you were trying to do. You have to use a

1817: 1743: 1516: 1488: 1460: 1445: 1437: 1380: 1344: 1316: 950: 938: 937:

Does the following sentence really add anything to the article? "The full title of linguist

902: 758: 570: 549: 207: 128: 2743:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 650:

This notice is a few days late. Sorry! Please let me know if I can be of any assistance. --

2887: 2373: 2327: 2048: 1480: 1368: 1301: 1229: 1040: 990: 913: 495: 439: 595:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's

1541:

Hello, Shanoman. Based on the templates on your talk page, please consider joining the

941:'s 2006 book on the use of slogans by conservatives to reshape the image of liberalism, 2740: 2732: 2322: 2122: 2114: 1661: 1640: 1557: 1535: 1474: 1263: 1239: 1191: 1167: 1153: 1072: 1068: 920:

Social Democracy, & Some Very-Soft Hints of very occasional Leftist rhetoric)": -->

768: 711: 707: 651: 642: 616: 171: 73: 2406: 277:

conservatives, etc.). In the United States, most people called conservatives are both

2736: 2651: 2346: 2303: 2155: 2132: 2091: 2052: 1945: 1906: 1888: 1607: 1586: 1286: 1256: 1214: 1184: 1133: 1111: 1100: 1064: 1059:

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

1025: 994: 963: 890: 873: 856: 847: 826: 796: 736: 686: 584: 536: 524: 516: 443: 386: 372: 336: 143: 104: 76: 55: 519:. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that 2317: 1075:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 834: 528: 421: 382: 348: 332: 312: 308: 304: 258: 1683: 1520: 1780:

If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to

1292:

template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to

1220:

template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to

2701: 2239: 2075: 2029: 1868: 1813: 1512: 1484: 1456: 1441: 946: 865: 731:

Or, if that isn't correct, maybe you can find it by simply going to the article

665: 566: 544: 468: 368: 360: 320: 316: 1506:

Regarding my user boxes, yes, you may use them. Of course, these aren't really

1360: 2181: 1297: 1225: 830: 818: 270: 2674:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

261:(I realize that there are several different senses of the word conservative: 2524: 2523:, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Knowledge's coverage of 2169: 2146: 2118: 1936: 1864:...if you start a line with a space, it creates these strange, shady boxes. 1657: 1636: 1553: 869: 838: 822: 724: 565:? You appear to be the primary author of the paragraphs I am questioning. - 476: 356: 287: 278: 124: 24:

To automatically redirect one wiki page to another use syntax of the form:

714:

for communication on talk pages - makes things easier for the rest of us.

1130: 898: 813: 773: 715: 669: 402: 377: 376:

possible, but why kill ourselves for it? My larger point is that extreme

352: 328: 299: 291: 2833: 1599: 483:)? I am surely not so vain nor naive, but hey, I think it's worth a try. 2509: 1087: 945:

is as an extended list of liberal slurs." I'm inclined to remove it… -

344: 311:

philosophy, I'm not sure what is. It seems to me that they may even be

254: 2861: 2820: 2764: 2709: 2603: 2540: 2381: 2354: 2335: 2306: 2126: 2099: 2083: 2060: 2037: 1896: 1876: 1821: 1682: 1665: 1644: 1561: 1492: 1464: 1449: 1418: 1388: 1350: 1324: 1305: 1233: 1161: 1141: 1114: 1103: 1081: 966: 876: 859: 776: 739: 718: 672: 654: 645: 573: 551: 498: 451: 429: 241: 192: 131: 107: 58: 38: 364: 324: 274: 266: 1726:

Sometimes we are asked to help rescue articles by people new to our

355:) fought for the liberation of blacks and women because it was the 1436:, and I'm in the market. If you're still interested, feel free to 406:

tantamount (or at least very similar) to saying "It's God's will".

283: 250: 198: 2731:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

2072:

answer that in detail. I'll look into providing a history. Thanks

127:? I reverted it, as I don't see why its not a legitimate page. 843: 295: 30:

on the page that you would like to be redirected. I've modified

1858:

Colons and asterisk can be combined to indent bullet points but

1296:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 1224:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 539:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

480: 2840:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

2503: 1749:

them if they have only been templated with deletion messages.

182:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 2832: 2623: 2508: 2405: 2203: 1972: 1598: 1394:

Date of birth missing should be placed in the talk page only

1359: 1244: 1172: 1051:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

1030:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

749:, but you will need to put in a section like the one below: 619:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 303:

anything else that exists besides humans. If this is not an

174:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 1401:

of yours, I would like to inform you that for we don't use

2067:

I assume you came to Electronic cigarettes for peer review

607:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the 343:

I realize that not all, or even most liberals will become

315:! I came to liberalism (for the second time) from a quasi 162:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the 1409:

and the instructions in the categories above. Thanks. --

82:

Fifth, Sixth, Seventh Party Systems of the United States?

2804:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Muesli belt malnutrition

1846:

to indent. Look at the following in edit mode as well:

1125:. I'm pretty sure I remember Vitz referring to them in 2785:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2692:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2568:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2472:

To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the

2111: 1794: 1789:

Many important discussions take place on the project's

1399: 347:

or egoistic, but I see no contradiction. Liberals (and

2657:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2110:

I removed your recent comments to Talk:Alkaline diet

790:), under the section of "Christian Interpretations": 2791:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

2574:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

2536:

the project, just add your name to the member list.

1635:I look forward to working with you in the future. 2587:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of leap years 1597: 1527:

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

599:, and the deletion notice explains why (see also " 2723:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1266:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 1194:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 985:need to infiltrate then take over the delusional 591:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 385:, who loves the earth, but I love humanity more. 150:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 2141: 1931: 1377:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Antimaterialism 725:http://en.wikipedia.org/The_Lotus_and_the_Robot 533:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Misanthropology 2392:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter 887:Talk:Modern "liberalism" in the United States 249:I suppose in the broadest sense of the word, 8: 2848:redirect, you might want to participate in 1315:Thanks, dude. That page was interesting. -- 2844:. Since you had some involvement with the 2323:The Trouble with “Transhumanism”: Part Two 1709: 1612: 1574: 989:and kick that rich Muslim-loving parasite 587:}} template has been added to the article 563:Talk:Radical_feminism#Sex-negative.3F_Etc. 2398: 2270:Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers 2140: 1930: 367:thing to do; likewise for protecting the 257:", if liberal means "anyone who is not a 2284:Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques 1993:Feature: Article rescue as a team effort 1805:If you have any questions, feel free to 1616:Articles tagged for deletion and rescue 2866: 2663:notice, but please explain why in your 1625:Articles tagged for deletion and rescue 1571:Welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! 788:Talk:Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil 2876: 2470: 1615: 1577: 1764:good advice for newcomers to deletion 1455:Great; what questions do you have? - 767:article. Also, you should look into 668:? I can't figure it out from diffs. 7: 1912: 1809:, and we will be happy to help you. 1338:Paleoconservatism#Individual liberty 1336:You recently added more material to 1331:Paleoconservatism#Individual liberty 2793:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 2576:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 2370:Condensed Critique of Transhumanism 1371:, an article that you created, for 561:Could you please see my remarks at 2852:if you have not already done so. 2652:deleted for any of several reasons 2639:because of the following concern: 2415:Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter 2133:Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter 782:Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil 14: 2802:The article will be discussed at 2749:review the candidates' statements 2585:The article will be discussed at 1919:Knowledge:Article Rescue Squadron 1782:the list of translators available 1713:Some points that may be helpful: 1356:AfD nomination of Antimaterialism 2778: 2561: 2180: 2168: 2145: 1998:Featured editor: MichaelQSchmidt 1935: 1853:Two colons indents a little more 1760:Introduction to deletion process 1534: 1530: 401:My larger point is that extreme 2395: 2023:for assistance in bringing the 1762:gives a good overview and some 1674: 1294:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1272:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 1222:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1200:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 909:-Soft Hints of very occasional 2862:21:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC) 2755:. For the Election committee, 2725:Arbitration Committee election 2716:ArbCom elections are now open! 1834:Very brief formatting tutorial 1678: 1403:Category:Date of birth missing 1252:Another editor has added the " 1180:Another editor has added the " 1115:20:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC) 1104:16:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 953:22:00, 22 December 2006 (UTC) 515:, an article you created, for 59:18:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 39:22:57, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 1: 2826:Atheistic religion listed at 2765:13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2265:Featured editor: Teeninvestor 2127:15:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC) 1793:; it is recommended that you 1696:Hi, Shanoman, welcome to the 1666:07:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 1645:07:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 1562:16:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 1521:01:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 1493:04:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC) 1465:20:22, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 1450:16:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 1325:18:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 1099:others who are anti-selfist? 1082:19:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 1007:Speedy Deletion Tag (for the 967:16:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 664:What are you trying to do on 627:, where it may be deleted if 123:Why did you redirect this to 2251:News items and announcements 2224: 2100:21:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC) 2084:10:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC) 1419:18:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 1389:09:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 1351:00:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 1306:14:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 1234:14:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 1162:05:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 1026:criteria for speedy deletion 850:20:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 148:The study of Misanthropology 146:}}" template to the article 138:The study of Misanthropology 108:00:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 77:23:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 63: 2751:and submit your choices on 2696:allows discussion to reach 2677:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2660:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2238: 2233:articles should be deleted. 2061:09:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 2038:06:38, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 1909:Newsletter (September 2009) 1850:One colon indents a little 1822:00:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 1582: 877:17:13, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 860:12:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 799:15:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 605:Knowledge's deletion policy 160:Knowledge's deletion policy 2908: 2757:MediaWiki message delivery 2688:exist. In particular, the 2604:23:18, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 2212:The community is currently 1897:19:56, 15 April 2009 (UTC) 1877:19:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC) 1812:And once again — Welcome! 1579: 1540: 1262:" template to the article 1190:" template to the article 1123:Martin & Deidre Bobgan 1001:) 18:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC) 983:Reality-minded individuals 777:19:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 740:19:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 719:19:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 673:19:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 339:19:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 2710:02:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 2682:proposed deletion process 2541:17:32, 6 April 2013 (UTC) 2144: 2025:Sufi Saints of South Asia 2015:Sufi Saints of South Asia 1955:Issue 1 (September 2009) 1934: 1677: 1500: 1142:23:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC) 1015:A tag has been placed on 655:23:45, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 646:23:45, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 617:proposed deletion process 574:22:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 529:Knowledge deletion policy 452:19:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 430:15:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 389:16:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 172:proposed deletion process 2828:Redirects for discussion 2821:15:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC) 2795:or whether it should be 2788:Muesli belt malnutrition 2772:Muesli belt malnutrition 2578:or whether it should be 2517:You are invited to join 2382:06:35, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 2355:06:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 2350: 2336:05:45, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 2326:to get a better idea. -- 2307:05:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 2095: 2056: 1892: 1478:before and </ref: --> 1137: 998: 987:National Taxpayers Union 901:, Extremely Ultra-Mild 882:maxim: Know your enemy! 621:speedy deletion criteria 552:03:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 499:01:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 455: 447: 242:23:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 193:02:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 176:speedy deletion criteria 2850:the redirect discussion 2669:the article's talk page 2165:Issue 2 (January 2010) 2156:Article Rescue Squadron 1946:Article Rescue Squadron 1907:Article Rescue Squadron 1698:Article Rescue Squadron 1608:Article Rescue Squadron 1543:Article Rescue Squadron 1049:the article's talk page 733:The Lotus and the Robot 706:Also, have a gander at 589:Hippie chick pie wagons 579:Hippie chick pie wagons 263:Christian conservatives 132:00:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 2837: 2628: 2513: 2448:News and announcements 2410: 1979:News and announcements 1705:nominated for deletion 1687: 1603: 1432:, I see you're up for 1364: 1249: 1177: 1127:Psychology as Religion 1019:requesting that it be 1004: 955: 934: 852: 806:mainline denominations 801: 597:criteria for inclusion 535:and please be sure to 392: 391: 341: 2836: 2729:Arbitration Committee 2694:articles for deletion 2637:proposed for deletion 2627: 2520:WikiProject Breakfast 2512: 2499:WikiProject Breakfast 2474:Newsletter draft page 2409: 2368:suggest you read his 1867:I hope this helps. -- 1756:Articles for deletion 1686: 1602: 1363: 1248: 1176: 972: 935: 930: 827:Postmodern Revolution 802: 792: 625:Articles for Deletion 623:or it can be sent to 601:What Knowledge is not 525:What Knowledge is not 247: 246: 245: 180:Articles for Deletion 178:or it can be sent to 156:What Knowledge is not 89:"Sixth Party System? 86:In response to this: 68:I have proposed your 2314:Techno-progressivism 1840:Invertebrate zoology 1807:ask on the talk page 1791:main discussion page 1588:Article Rescue Squad 1282:. If you remove the 1276:Knowledge:Notability 1210:. If you remove the 1204:Knowledge:Notability 70:Women's Suffrage Day 64:Women's Suffrage Day 32:Douglas B. Rasmussen 2733:arbitration process 2422:Volume I, Issue III 1844:Colon (punctuation) 1470:Help:Contents/Links 253:can be considered " 2846:Atheistic religion 2842:Atheistic religion 2838: 2745:arbitration policy 2686:deletion processes 2629: 2571:List of leap years 2555:List of leap years 2514: 2411: 2297:Techno-Progressive 2106:Talk:Alkaline diet 1688: 1604: 1501:Ask123's userboxes 1365: 1250: 1178: 1017:Silent generations 810:liberal Protestant 735:. Hope that helps. 537:sign your comments 504:AfD nomination of 186:Ungovernable Force 142:I have added a "{{ 117:Viennese Actionism 2615:Proposed deletion 2609:proposed deletion 2550: 2549: 2515:Hello, Shanoman. 2491: 2490: 2487: 2486: 2462: 2456: 2450: 2444: 2438: 2293: 2292: 2245: 2244: 2194: 2193: 2190: 2189: 2079: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2006: 1963: 1962: 1959: 1958: 1828: 1827: 1803: 1802: 1692: 1691: 1651: 1650: 1633: 1632: 1593: 1568: 1567: 1367:I have nominated 1268:proposed deletion 1196:proposed deletion 1009:Silent Generation 895:Global Capitalism 747:Citation template 699: 685:comment added by 593:proposed deletion 152:proposed deletion 2899: 2892: 2891: 2886:Empty citation ( 2884: 2882: 2874: 2871: 2782: 2781: 2679: 2678: 2662: 2661: 2626: 2565: 2564: 2538:Northamerica1000 2527:-related topics. 2504: 2458: 2452: 2446: 2440: 2434: 2417: 2400: 2399: 2396: 2219:deciding whether 2208: 2207: 2204: 2185: 2184: 2172: 2149: 2142: 2138: 2137: 2081: 2077: 1973: 1939: 1932: 1928: 1927: 1913: 1748: 1742: 1710: 1679: 1675: 1628: 1613: 1592: 1589: 1583: 1575: 1538: 1531: 1291: 1285: 1261: 1255: 1219: 1213: 1189: 1183: 1079: 1046: 1045: 1039: 1021:speedily deleted 939:Geoffrey Nunberg 928: 927: 923: 903:Social Democracy 763: 757: 698: 679: 640: 634: 610: 557:Radical feminism 490:Misanthropology? 237: 234: 231: 228: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 187: 165: 2907: 2906: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2885: 2875: 2873: 2872: 2868: 2831: 2813:Kintetsubuffalo 2783: 2779: 2776: 2753:the voting page 2719: 2690:speedy deletion 2676: 2675: 2659: 2658: 2633:Post-Protestant 2624: 2622: 2619:Post-Protestant 2611: 2566: 2562: 2559: 2546: 2502: 2480:recipients list 2466: 2465: 2464: 2430: 2428: 2413: 2394: 2299: 2294: 2200: 2167: 2136: 2108: 2074: 2069: 2049:Radical Honesty 2017: 2008: 1969: 1911: 1865: 1838:If you look at 1836: 1773:our rescue list 1746: 1740: 1739:and maybe even 1702: 1673: 1671:Welcome to ARS! 1629: 1622: 1587: 1585: 1573: 1529: 1503: 1426: 1398:Hi. Concerning 1396: 1369:Antimaterialism 1358: 1334: 1313: 1289: 1283: 1259: 1253: 1243: 1217: 1211: 1187: 1181: 1171: 1150: 1091: 1077: 1061:for biographies 1043: 1037: 1036: 1013: 991:Grover Norquist 929: 925: 921: 919: 918: 784: 761: 755: 752:==References== 680: 662: 638: 632: 608: 581: 559: 541:Misanthropology 521:Misanthropology 513:Misanthropology 511:I've nominated 509: 506:Misanthropology 492: 273:conservatives, 269:conservatives, 235: 232: 229: 226: 223: 220: 217: 214: 211: 208: 203: 185: 163: 140: 120: 102: 98: 84: 66: 52: 19: 12: 11: 5: 2905: 2903: 2894: 2893: 2865: 2830: 2824: 2777: 2775: 2770:Nomination of 2768: 2722: 2718: 2713: 2700:for deletion. 2680:will stop the 2648: 2647: 2621: 2612: 2610: 2607: 2560: 2558: 2553:Nomination of 2551: 2548: 2547: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2528: 2507: 2501: 2497:Invitation to 2495: 2493: 2489: 2488: 2485: 2484: 2477: 2468: 2467: 2432: 2431: 2424: 2420: 2404: 2403: 2393: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2339: 2338: 2298: 2295: 2291: 2290: 2287: 2286: 2281: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2267: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2253: 2246: 2243: 2242: 2236: 2235: 2229: 2228: 2222: 2221: 2215: 2214: 2202: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2188: 2187: 2174:Previous issue 2162: 2161: 2150: 2135: 2130: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2068: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2016: 2013: 2010: 2009: 2005: 2004: 2001: 2000: 1995: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1981: 1971: 1965: 1961: 1960: 1957: 1956: 1952: 1951: 1940: 1924: 1923: 1910: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1854: 1835: 1832: 1830: 1826: 1825: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1786: 1785: 1777: 1776: 1768: 1767: 1751: 1750: 1723: 1722: 1721:clarification. 1715: 1714: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1672: 1669: 1653: 1649: 1648: 1631: 1630: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1595: 1594: 1581: 1578: 1572: 1569: 1566: 1565: 1539: 1528: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1502: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1438:drop me a line 1425: 1422: 1395: 1392: 1357: 1354: 1333: 1328: 1312: 1309: 1264:Sex-negativity 1242: 1240:Sex-negativity 1237: 1192:Sex-negativity 1170: 1168:Sex-negativity 1165: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1118: 1117: 1090: 1085: 1012: 1005: 917: 884: 854: 783: 780: 743: 742: 728: 727: 701: 700: 661: 658: 609:{{dated prod}} 580: 577: 558: 555: 508: 502: 491: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 472: 462: 461: 460: 459: 433: 432: 418: 409: 408: 397: 396: 305:antihumanistic 286:is completely 202: 196: 164:{{dated prod}} 139: 136: 135: 134: 119: 114: 112: 99: 95: 83: 80: 65: 62: 51: 48: 46: 43: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2904: 2889: 2880: 2870: 2867: 2864: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2835: 2829: 2825: 2823: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2808: 2805: 2800: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2789: 2773: 2769: 2767: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2717: 2714: 2712: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2672: 2670: 2666: 2655: 2653: 2646: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2638: 2634: 2620: 2616: 2613: 2608: 2606: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2591: 2588: 2583: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2572: 2556: 2552: 2542: 2539: 2535: 2534: 2529: 2526: 2522: 2521: 2511: 2506: 2505: 2500: 2496: 2494: 2483: 2481: 2475: 2469: 2463: 2461: 2455: 2449: 2443: 2437: 2429: 2427: 2426:February 2012 2423: 2418: 2416: 2408: 2402: 2401: 2397: 2391: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2324: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2305: 2296: 2289: 2285: 2282: 2280: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2271: 2268: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2257: 2254: 2252: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2241: 2237: 2234: 2231: 2230: 2227: 2223: 2220: 2217: 2216: 2213: 2210: 2209: 2206: 2205: 2201: 2199: 2186: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2164: 2163: 2160: 2159: 2157: 2151: 2148: 2143: 2139: 2134: 2131: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2117:? Thanks! -- 2116: 2112: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2082: 2080: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2026: 2022: 2014: 2003: 1999: 1996: 1994: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1985: 1982: 1980: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1968: 1954: 1953: 1950: 1949: 1947: 1941: 1938: 1933: 1929: 1926: 1925: 1922: 1920: 1915: 1914: 1908: 1904: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1857: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1845: 1841: 1833: 1831: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1810: 1808: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1752: 1745: 1738: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1724: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1701: 1699: 1685: 1681: 1680: 1676: 1670: 1668: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1654: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1626: 1620: 1619: 1614: 1611: 1609: 1601: 1596: 1590: 1576: 1570: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1550: 1549:here << 1544: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1476: 1471: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1423: 1421: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1393: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1362: 1355: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1346: 1343: 1339: 1332: 1329: 1327: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1310: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1288: 1281: 1280:its talk page 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1258: 1247: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1216: 1209: 1208:its talk page 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1186: 1175: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1129:. Their site 1128: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1116: 1113: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1102: 1097: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1074: 1073:for companies 1070: 1066: 1065:for web sites 1062: 1057: 1054: 1050: 1042: 1033: 1031: 1027: 1022: 1018: 1010: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 976: 975: 971: 969: 968: 965: 964:User:Shanoman 961: 954: 952: 948: 944: 940: 933: 924: 915: 912: 908: 905:, & Some 904: 900: 896: 892: 891:Progressivism 888: 885: 883: 879: 878: 875: 871: 867: 862: 861: 858: 851: 849: 845: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 815: 811: 807: 800: 798: 791: 789: 781: 779: 778: 775: 770: 764: 760: 753: 750: 748: 741: 738: 734: 730: 729: 726: 723: 722: 721: 720: 717: 713: 709: 704: 696: 692: 688: 684: 677: 676: 675: 674: 671: 667: 659: 657: 656: 653: 648: 647: 644: 637: 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 613:its talk page 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 578: 576: 575: 572: 568: 564: 556: 554: 553: 550: 548: 547: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 507: 503: 501: 500: 497: 489: 482: 478: 473: 470: 466: 465: 464: 463: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 436: 435: 434: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 410: 407: 404: 399: 398: 394: 393: 390: 388: 384: 379: 374: 373:biotechnology 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 340: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 244: 243: 240: 238: 200: 197: 195: 194: 191: 189: 188: 181: 177: 173: 169: 168:its talk page 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 137: 133: 130: 126: 122: 121: 118: 115: 113: 110: 109: 106: 94: 90: 87: 81: 79: 78: 75: 71: 61: 60: 57: 49: 47: 44: 41: 40: 37: 33: 28: 25: 22: 16: 2869: 2845: 2839: 2809: 2801: 2786: 2784: 2774:for deletion 2720: 2684:, but other 2673: 2665:edit summary 2656: 2649: 2643: 2631:The article 2630: 2592: 2584: 2569: 2567: 2557:for deletion 2531: 2518: 2516: 2492: 2471: 2433: 2425: 2421: 2419: 2414: 2412: 2321: 2318:Dale Carrico 2300: 2288: 2197: 2195: 2166: 2153: 2152: 2109: 2073: 2070: 2047:in his book 2045:Brad Blanton 2021:Reward Board 2018: 2002: 1966: 1964: 1943: 1942: 1916: 1884: 1866: 1837: 1829: 1811: 1804: 1795:watchlist it 1755: 1700:WikiProject! 1695: 1693: 1655: 1652: 1634: 1624: 1605: 1552: 1507: 1429: 1427: 1411:Magioladitis 1397: 1366: 1335: 1314: 1251: 1179: 1151: 1126: 1095: 1092: 1058: 1052: 1034: 1014: 979: 977: 974: 973: 970: 959: 956: 936: 931: 906: 893:": Moderate 880: 863: 853: 835:conservatism 803: 793: 785: 765: 754: 751: 744: 705: 702: 690: 681:— Preceding 663: 649: 582: 560: 545: 510: 493: 400: 383:humanitarian 349:progressives 342: 333:original sin 313:sex-negative 309:misanthropic 259:conservative 248: 204: 184: 141: 111: 103: 91: 88: 85: 67: 53: 45: 42: 29: 27:#REDIRECT ] 26: 23: 20: 2854:K.e.coffman 2436:Front cover 1606:Welcome to 1381:Closedmouth 1345:Will Beback 1317:Juansidious 866:irreligious 666:Peristalsis 660:Peristalsis 469:post-script 369:environment 361:enlightened 321:libertarian 317:objectivist 129:Wickethewok 2741:topic bans 2374:Loremaster 2328:Loremaster 2240:background 2178:Next issue 2158:Newsletter 1948:Newsletter 1921:Newsletter 1728:notability 1428:Greetings 1407:WP:PRIVACY 831:right-wing 821:(see also 819:Modern Era 527:" and the 496:PelleSmith 414:Armageddon 271:capitalist 50:Your edits 2879:cite book 2737:site bans 2698:consensus 2635:has been 2596:Dricherby 2525:breakfast 2028:Regards-- 1627:not found 1623:Category 1154:Wuapinmon 1069:for bands 960:wholesale 897:, Strong 870:arbitrary 839:moderates 823:Modernity 652:Fang Aili 643:Fang Aili 636:db-author 629:consensus 477:left-wing 357:objective 288:voluntary 279:Christian 125:Actionism 74:Helenalex 34:for you. 17:Redirects 2645:article. 2460:Want ads 2347:Shanoman 2304:Shanoman 2279:Want ads 2092:Shanoman 2053:Shanoman 1984:Want ads 1889:Shanoman 1737:civility 1732:sourcing 1580:WELCOME 1481:WP:CITET 1434:adoption 1430:Shanoman 1424:Adoption 1373:deletion 1134:Shanoman 1112:Shanoman 1101:DCDuring 995:Shanoman 932:Nunberg 914:rhetoric 899:Centrism 874:Shanoman 857:Padillah 848:Shanoman 814:orthodox 797:Padillah 737:Shanoman 695:contribs 687:Shanoman 683:unsigned 517:deletion 444:Shanoman 403:altruism 387:Shanoman 378:altruism 353:leftists 337:Shanoman 329:hedonist 300:province 292:pleasure 105:Shanoman 56:Fan-1967 2797:deleted 2580:deleted 2442:Feature 2256:Contest 2198:Content 2115:WP:TALK 1967:Content 1885:Thanks! 1744:welcome 1584:from a 1475:WP:CITE 1088:Selfism 978:Update: 958:now; a 911:Leftist 769:WP:BOOK 759:reflist 712:WP:SIGN 708:WP:TALK 422:Vargher 345:selfist 255:liberal 201:article 2727:. The 2702:Borock 2667:or on 2226:60,000 2030:Shahab 1869:Boston 1814:Addbot 1591:member 1513:ask123 1485:Draeco 1457:Draeco 1442:Draeco 1311:Thanks 1053:speedy 1041:hangon 947:Jmabel 603:" and 567:Jmabel 467:P.S. ( 440:reason 365:humane 325:egoist 323:, and 275:Soviet 267:Muslim 158:" and 2454:Humor 2078:ELYZA 1548:: --> 1547:: --> 1298:BJBot 1226:BJBot 1071:, or 844:ranty 842:seem 808:(or " 284:VHEMT 251:VHEMT 199:VHEMT 2888:help 2858:talk 2817:talk 2761:talk 2706:talk 2600:talk 2533:join 2378:talk 2351:talk 2332:talk 2154:The 2123:talk 2119:Ronz 2096:talk 2057:talk 2034:talk 1944:The 1917:The 1905:The 1893:talk 1873:talk 1818:talk 1754:The 1730:and 1662:talk 1658:Ikip 1641:talk 1637:Ikip 1558:talk 1554:Ikip 1517:talk 1489:talk 1483:. - 1461:talk 1446:talk 1415:talk 1385:talk 1342:·:· 1321:talk 1302:talk 1287:prod 1274:and 1257:prod 1230:talk 1215:prod 1202:and 1185:prod 1158:talk 1138:talk 1096:some 1078:shoy 999:talk 951:Talk 922:edit 907:Very 710:and 691:talk 585:prod 583:A {{ 571:Talk 546:Nick 456:talk 448:talk 426:talk 363:and 351:and 296:self 144:prod 36:Dave 21:Hi, 2721:Hi, 2617:of 2530:To 1348:·:· 1148:FYI 1032:. 774:WLU 716:WLU 670:WLU 481:LOL 2883:: 2881:}} 2877:{{ 2860:) 2819:) 2799:. 2763:) 2739:, 2708:) 2671:. 2654:. 2602:) 2582:. 2482:. 2457:| 2451:| 2445:| 2439:| 2380:) 2353:) 2334:) 2176:| 2125:) 2098:) 2059:) 2036:) 1895:) 1887:-- 1875:) 1820:) 1747:}} 1741:{{ 1664:) 1643:) 1560:) 1551:. 1519:) 1508:my 1491:) 1463:) 1448:) 1417:) 1387:) 1323:) 1304:) 1290:}} 1284:{{ 1260:}} 1254:{{ 1232:) 1218:}} 1212:{{ 1188:}} 1182:{{ 1160:) 1140:) 1067:, 1063:, 1044:}} 1038:{{ 949:| 889:(" 762:}} 756:{{ 697:) 693:• 641:. 639:}} 633:{{ 569:| 450:) 428:) 359:, 307:, 265:, 230:ll 2890:) 2856:( 2815:( 2759:( 2704:( 2598:( 2476:. 2376:( 2349:( 2330:( 2121:( 2094:( 2076:F 2055:( 2032:( 1891:( 1871:( 1816:( 1797:. 1775:. 1766:. 1660:( 1639:( 1556:( 1515:( 1487:( 1459:( 1444:( 1413:( 1383:( 1319:( 1300:( 1228:( 1156:( 1136:( 1011:) 997:( 926:] 916:) 833:( 689:( 471:) 458:) 454:( 446:( 424:( 335:. 327:/ 319:- 236:3 233:2 227:a 224:b 221:w 218:e 215:r 212:c 209:S

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index